OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
CITY OF CHICAGO
RAHM EMANUEL
MAYOR
September 24, 2015
TO THE HONORABLE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Ladies and Gentlemen:
At the request ofthe Commissioner of Planning and Development, I transmit herewith ordinances authorizing amendments to various TIF Districts.
Your favorable consideration of these ordinances will be appreciated.
Mayor
Very truly yours,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS APPROVING
AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 TO THE BELMONT/CENTRAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT FOR THE
BELMONT/CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
WHEREAS, under ordinances adopted on January 12, 2000, and published in the Journal of Proceedings of the City Council of the City of Chicago (the "Journal") for such date at pages 22590 to 22740, and under the provisions of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4.1 et seq., as amended (the "Act"), the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Chicago (the "City"): (i) approved the "Belmont/Central Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project" (the "Belmont/Central Plan") for a portion of the City known as the "Belmont/Central Redevelopment Project Area" (the "Original Area") (the "Original Plan Ordinance"); (ii) designated the Original Area as a "redevelopment project area" within the requirements of the Act (the "Designation Ordinance"); and (iii) adopted tax increment financing for the Original Area (the "Adoption Ordinance") (the Original Plan Ordinance, the Designation Ordinance, and the Adoption Ordinance are collectively referred to herein as the "TIF Ordinances"); and
WHEREAS, the Belmont/Central Plan underwent certain revisions prior to the adoption ofthe TIF Ordinances (collectively, "Revision Number 1"), the substance of Revision Number 1 having been approved and adopted by the City Council by virtue of the inclusion of said revisions in the Belmont/Central Plan and the approval and adoption by the City Council of the TIF Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to an ordinance adopted on May 17, 2000, and published in the Journal for such date at pages 32103 to 32222, the City Council determined that an amendment to the Belmont/Central Plan was necessary in order to incorporate the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("E.A.V.") ofthe Original Area, such incorporation being required pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(n)(F) ("Revision Number 2") (the Belmont/Central Plan, as amended by Revision Number 2, is hereinafter referred to as the "Belmont/Central Plan Number 2"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to an ordinance adopted on July 6, 2011, and published in the Journal for such date at pages 2231 to 2357, the City Council determined that an additional amendment (referred to in the Journal as "Amendment Number 1 to Belmont/Central Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project," hereafter referred to as "Amendment Number 1") was necessary in order to increase the total estimated redevelopment project costs as set forth in the Belmont/Central Plan Number 2 (the Belmont/Central Plan Number 2, as amended by Amendment Number 1, is hereafter referred to as the "Original Plan"); and
WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens of the City for the City to encourage development of areas located adjacent to the Original Area by adding certain additional contiguous parcels (the "Added Area") to the Original Area and designating such expanded project area as a redevelopment project area under the Act to be known as the "Belmont/Central Redevelopment Amendment Number 2 Project Area" (the "Area"); and
|1010|WHEREAS, the City desires further to supplement and amend the Original Plan for the Original Area to provide for the redevelopment of the Area; and
WHEREAS, the City has caused to be prepared an eligibility study entitled "Added Area Eligibility Study" (the "Eligibility Study") of the proposed Added Area, which Eligibility Study confirms the existence within the Added Area of various conservation factors and vacant blighted factors as set forth in the Act, and supports a finding of eligibility of the Added Area for designation as a combination Conservation/Blighted Area under the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City has caused to be prepared a housing impact study entitled "Belmont Central Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Financing Program Housing Impact Study" (the "Housing Study") of the Area, which Housing Study fulfills the legislative requirements for a Housing Impact Study, as set forth in Section 5/11-74.4-1 et seq. ofthe Act; and
WHEREAS, the Original Plan and the "Belmont/Central Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment Number 2: May 1, 2015" ("Amendment Number 2" and, together with the Original Plan, the "Amended Plan"), provides new total estimated redevelopment project costs for the Area; and
WHEREAS, a copy of Amendment Number 2 is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens of the City for the City to implement Tax Increment Allocation Financing pursuant to the Act for the Area described in Section 2 ofthis ordinance, to be redeveloped pursuant to the Amended Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission (the "Commission") of the City has heretofore been appointed by the Mayor of the City with the approval of its City Council (the City Council, referred to herein collectively with the Mayor as the "Corporate Authorities") (as codified in Section 2-124 ofthe City's Municipal Code) pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) ofthe Act; and
WHEREAS, the Commission is empowered by the Corporate Authorities to exercise certain powers enumerated in Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) ofthe Act, including the holding of certain public hearings required by the Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 5/11-74.4-4 and 5/11-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission, by authority of the Corporate Authorities, called a public hearing (the "Hearing") on July 14, 2015, concerning approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area pursuant to the Act; and
WHEREAS, Amendment Number 2 (including the Eligibility Study and Housing Study) was made available for public inspection and review pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act since May 1, 2015, being a date not less than 10 days before the meeting of the Commission at which the Commission adopted Resolution 15-CDC-13 on May 12, 2015, accepting the Amended Plan for review and fixing the time and place for a public hearing
|1010|
("Hearing"), at the offices of the City Clerk and the City's Department of Planning and Development; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) ofthe Act, notice ofthe availability ofthe Amendment Number 2 (including the related Eligibility Study and the Housing Study) was sent by mail on May 19, 2015, which is within a reasonable time after the adoption by the Commission of Resolution 15-CDC-13 to: (a) all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, were determined to be (i) located within the Area and (ii) located within 750 feet of the boundaries of the Area (or, if applicable, were determined to be the 750 residential addresses that were closest to the boundaries of the Area); and (b) organizations and residents that were registered interested parties for such Area; and
WHEREAS, due notice of the Hearing was given pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-6 of the Act, said notice being given to all taxing districts having property within the Area, to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity of the State of Illinois by certified mail on April 15, 2015, by publication in the Chicago Sun-Times or Chicago Tribune on June 16, 2015 and June 23, 2015, and by certified mail to taxpayers within the Area on June 16, 2015; and
WHEREAS, a meeting of the joint review board established pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(b) of the Act (the "Board") was convened upon the provision of due notice on June 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., to review the matters properly coming before the Board and to allow it to provide its advisory recommendation regarding the approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act, adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area, and other matters, if any, properly before it; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 5/11-74.4-4 and 5/11-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission held the Hearing concerning approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act, and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area pursuant to the Act, on July 14, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has forwarded to the City Council a copy of its Resolution 15-CDC-19 attached hereto as Exhibit B, adopted on July 14, 2015, recommending to the City Council approval ofthe Amended Plan, among other related matters; and
WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the Amended Plan (including the related Eligibility Study and the Housing Study), testimony from the Public Meeting and the Hearing, if any, the recommendation of the Board, if any, the recommendation of the Commission and such other matters or studies as the Corporate Authorities have deemed necessary or appropriate to make the findings set forth herein, and are generally informed ofthe conditions existing in the Area; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO:
Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
Section 2. The Area. The Area is legally described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein. The street locations (as near as practicable) for the Area are described in
|1010|
Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein. The map ofthe Area is depicted in Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 3. Findings. The Corporate Authorities hereby make the following findings as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(n) of the Act:
The Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be expected to be developed without the adoption ofthe Amended Plan;
The Amended Plan:
conforms to the comprehensive plan for the development of the City as a whole; or
either (A) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the Chicago Plan Commission or (B) includes land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission; and
The Amended Plan meets all of the requirements of a redevelopment plan as defined in the Act and, as set forth in the Amended Plan, the estimated date of completion of the projects described therein and retirement of all obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs is not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in subsection (b) of Section 11-74.4-8 of the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year after the year in which the ordinance approving the Original Area was adopted, and, as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-7 ofthe Act, no such obligation shall have a maturity date greater than 20 years; and
Within the Amended Plan, if applicable:
as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(5) of the Act, the housing impact study: a) includes data on residential unit type, room type, unit occupancy, and racial and ethnic composition ofthe residents; and b) identifies the number and location of inhabited residential units in the Area that are to be or may be removed, if any, the City's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the Area whose residences are to be removed, the availability of replacement housing for such residents and the type, location, and cost of the replacement housing, and the type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided; and
as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(7) ofthe Act, there is a statement that households of low-income and very low-income persons living in residential units that are to be removed from the Area shall be provided affordable housing and relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations under that Act, including the eligibility criteria.
|1010|
Section 4. Approval ofthe Amended Plan. The City hereby approves the Amended Plan pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-4 of the Act.
Section 5. Powers of Eminent Domain. In compliance with Section 5/11-74.4-4(c) ofthe Act and with the Amended Plan, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to negotiate for the acquisition by the City of parcels contained within the Area. In the event the Corporation Counsel is unable to acquire any of said parcels through negotiation, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings to acquire such parcels. Nothing herein shall be in derogation of any proper authority.
Section 6. Invalidity of Any Section. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any ofthe remaining provisions ofthis ordinance.
Section 7. Superseder. All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage.
|1010|
List of Attachments
Exhibit A: Amendment Number 2
Exhibit B: CDC Resolution recommending to City Council approval of the Amended Plan, designation ofthe Area and adoption of tax increment allocation financing
Exhibit C: Legal description of the Area
Exhibit D: Street locations of the Area
Exhibit E: Map of the Area
|1010|
EXHIBIT A Amendment Number 2
|1010|
' 13 j
&* [ -' V'^_^ ' - 20I5HAYHI AH# 18
^ The Belmont/Central -n '>' u;
Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project
September 1, Revised as of October 29, 1999 Revised as of January 6, 2000 Amendment No. 1 as of May 5, 20.11
Amendment No. 2 May 1,2015
City of Chicago Rahm Emanuel, Mayor
Department of Planning and.Development Andrew J. Mooney, Commissioner
PGAVplanners
BclmonlVCeiitral T1K Redevelopment Plan and Project ; Amendment No. 2
Amendment No. 2 Table of Gontents
Amendment No. 2 Summary
Section 1.^ -Introduction and|Exeicutive Su
Section II. Legal Description and Project Boundary Sectioft iM ^Statutory Basis for Tax Increment Section IV. Redevelopment Goals and Objectives
Section V. Basis for Eligibility of the Area & Findings
Section VI. Redevelopment Plan and Project
Section VII. Statutory Compliance and Implementation Strategy
Plan Amendment (April 2015) Page 1
'Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and/Project j i:^sf\l »•!>,.:„v*..'dssl£Gity/of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 ... " ... . -?V
Amendment No. 2 Summary
Tax Increment Financing ("TIF") is permitted by the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation
RecTeyelpprrjept Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74:4-1 ret seq., as amended (me fT^ct"). The Act provides a
;mechanism:fo>munra a'fferTrrieetjng;^ for establishing a
redeYelopifient project area and •a^d.§Yelbprnent plan,; to: mitigate- 'blighting-^inflOences, encourage local growth and: development, and attract" newi phvate development to; the redevelopment area.
The Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan (the "Original Plan") and Project Area (the
"Original Area") was approved in September of 1999, revised in October of 1999, revised in
January pt^QdQ.^and subsequently amended by Amendment No. 1 in July spf; 2Q11; The
Original Plan included a (egal description of the Origihaf'Are^^assessment o¥ TIF "eligibility;;;
factors,.goals andjpbjectives, prqject-cp'sts^.sources of funds, yajuatjpnof parcels,,impaicts on
surrounding, ar^ irhpac^ahalysis1.
•~r V- . ^¦'."?«-; ¦ . \.\> ' . fh:rA
The Original Plan, inclusive of revisions 1 and 2 and Amendment No. 1, is being amended to
extend the boundaries, provide a Housing Impact Study ("HIS") on the entire Belmont/Central
Redevelopment Area, update the cost budgets and increment projections, and bring the Original
Plan up to current:City ordinance and policy standards. This Amendment No. 2 document (the
"Amendment") will provide information on the area proposed to be added and qualified (the
"Added Area") to the Original Area and other changes to the Original Plan. „.,=>.,. i J;;„.
For this Amendment, the Added Area, when considered with the Original Area will create the new boundary for the Belmont/Central TIF. Redevelopment Area.(the "Area").
As the Original Area does not require a new Eligibility Study, references to "Eligibility Study" in this Amendment shall mean the eligibility study required to qualify the Added Area (the "Added Area Eligibility Study"). Any references in the Added Area Eligibility Study are specific to the Added Area Eligibility Study document only and not this Amendment. References to the "Project Area" in the Added Area Eligibility Study are meant to mean only the Added Area for that Study and not the Project Area as indicated in this Redevelopment Plan.
The exhibits included with this Amendment are to be added to existing exhibits and are:
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit A - Boundary Map (A map of the
boundaries of the Project Area)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit B - Existing Land Use (the existing land uses of the Project Area)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibits C1 and C2 - General Land Use Plan (The Project Area Land Use Plan divided into north and south maps)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit D - Existing Zoning (Existing zoning classifications regarding the Project Area)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit E - Sub Area Key (the Added Area as divided into 13 sub areas)
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PCj^VPLANNERS
Page 2
10
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project \ i City of Chicago^
Amendment No. 2 ; ¦»> h
• Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibits G1 through G6 - Existing Conditions
(The existing conditions in the Added Area only)
• ^ PianiAppendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit H - Adja'cbnt TIE / Redeye[ORment Areas
Plan Appendix, Attachment Three - Legal Description (The Project Area)
Plan Appendix. Attachmerit#Qur ^ Parcel Listing (A Parc$lfld6ntification NOrnber
("PIN'XIisting ofthe-Adde^A^)^ ^'V ' ¦ V t ' ¦ s
? • PlamAppendfx^ Attachment Five - Added'1At^Eligibilitx^;$tudy^Th=
• Plan Appendix, Attachment Six - Housing Impact Study (A Housing Impact Study
The ehan'g^slp/ovided by -this Amendment are outlined in the followingtsections that conform to !:the-forrnat'6l|he:Origih A-JL
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 3
11
Belmont/Central Til1' Redevelopment Plan and Project ^ i-\.Z:; , City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 _ : ;ij
Section I. Introduction and Executive Summary ;
y Before Subsection A. Area Location an introductory paragraph is to be added as follows:
The Belmont/Central TIRRedevelopment Plan (the "Plan") and Project Area, (the "Area")
was approved*inrSeptember of 1999; revised invOctober of 1999, revised in January^of
, 2000, and subsequently^amended by Amendment No. 1 in July of 2011 and by this
Amendment No. 2 in May of 2015. This AimendmenfeNb: 2 (the "Amendment"), was
approved to extend the boundaries of the AreaH update the Plan cost budgets and
increment projections,? and-bring the Plan^up to*"current City of ChicagpV(th^"City")
ordinance and'policy standards. ' " Cf' '-.v
Subsection A. Area Location is deleted' and replaced with the following: ,
¦ ., f^TheProject Area is located in the City approximately 9 miles northwest of the central business district. The Area consists of the original BelmonUCentrakRedevelopment Area as approved, revised, and previously amended by Amendment No. 1 (the "Original Area") and the .additional', areaxonsidered byithis Amendment (the "Added Area"). The Area is located within the Portage Park' and Belmont"?Cragin neighborhoods. The Area covers 325.8 acres in an estimated 1,386;parcels^repre^
Parcel Identification Numbers ("PINS"). The Areals'/irregularlysshaped with 'boundaries1 that follow the commercial corridors along several major streets that include:
Central Avenue from Berenice Avenue on the north to Fullerton Avenue op the
south; j:; _ ¦ "~."
Belmont Avenue from Meade Avenue on the west to LeClaire Avenue on the east; Diversey Avenue" from Merrimac Avenue on the west to an alley just west of Cicero Avenue on the east;
Laramie Avenue from Belmont Avenue on the north generally to Fullerton Avenue on the south, excepting blocks between Wellington Avenue and George Street and between Wrightwpod Avenue and Deming Place; and
Fullerton Avenue from Melvina Avenue on the west to Lamon Avenue on the east.
Within these corridors, the block face on both sides of the street (to the respective parallel alley) is generally included. The Area includes the^Qbmmunity'First'^Medical-Center (formerly Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center) site, Chopin Park, Blackhawk Park, and Cragin Park. There are eight school uses in the Project Area. The boundaries of the Area are described in the Plan .Appendix on. Attachment Three -Legal Description and are geographically shown iri the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two on Exhibit A - Boundary Map.
Subsection B. Existing Conditions is deleted and replaced with the following:
The Area consists primarily of older commercial properties located along the commercial corridors formed by the streets noted above (See the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit B, Existing Land Use). Many structures in the Area are in need of repair due to depreciation of physical maintenance and other conditions. Declining public and private investment is also evidenced by deterioration and depreciation of maintenance of some of the public infrastructure components (principally streets and sidewalks) and
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PGs^VPLANNERS
Page 4
12
Belmont/Central TIF,Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
deterioration of private properties as documented in the Eligibility Study included as
Attachment'. "One of the Appendix' for the; Original Area;1and .as^fojuindainathe^ Plan
Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study, for the Added. Area.
Eighty-four percent (84%) of the buildings in the Original Area, and ninety-foufepercent
(94%) of the buildings in the Added Area are 35 years of age or older. Zoning
j -classifications;^ and residential categories as
shown in-the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two ExhibitT) - Existing Zoning map;
The Original Area was characterized by the following conditions: *
the predominance (84%) of structures that are 35 years old or older;
.r obsoies'ceto^ " '* ... .„ :"•''¦. :• "
excessiye land coverage (66% of buildings or site improvements);
depreciation of physical maintenance (80% of buildings or site improvements);
lack of community, planning (67% of buildings or parcels).
In addition, the Original Area exhibited other characteristics to a lesser extent which are ""i ^^t.iortfifihtthe^. Eligibility Study inc|udihg^
lighting requiring repair arid maintenance. :„. A:$®tz \ „ :%m?;-.
The improved portions ofthe Added Area are characterized by the following conditions:
the predominance of buildings that are 35 years of age or oldor. (94% of buildings);
deteriorated buildings (65% of buildings); ;M
deteriorated site improvements (36% of parcels);
y'&-.*> deteriorated street and/or sidewalk pavement (92% of sub-areas);
¦M'- • excessive land coverage (66% of improved parcels); , "Ift. sf:?
^r^^inadequakutilities (100% of suD-a"reas')';- ¦ - . ¦¦'.La,- -I.^i
•s deterioration of structures or site improvements areas neighboring vacant parcels
- ; ¦'(ibo%^arg,.;/-;: .
demonstrates declining and subpar equalized assessed valuation growth (meets all
thresholds). ¦ <^m,. . . ^
In addition, the Added Area exhibits other characteristics to a1esser:extent;whi^ forth in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study. These lesser characteristics ^include obsolete buildings, primary buildings with excessive vacancies, tax delinquencies, and deleterious land use or layout.
Subsection C. Business and Industry Trends, firstj^nd: secoiid^paragraphs am and replaced with the following:
The age of many of the buildings and the inability of properties in the Project Area to provide contemporary commercial building sites and buildings has contributed to a gradual decline of the commercial corridors in the; Area.,irSome buildings are vacant and/or in need of maintenance and repair to deteriorating portions of the structures. There are 22 parcels of vacant land, some building vacancies, and several deteriorated buildings in the Added Area. The possibility exists that some businesses jn the Area may need to relocate if they are unable to expand at their current location. Some
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^iS/pLANNERS
Page 5
13
Belmont/Cpntral TIE Redevelopment Plan and Project ;,s City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 . „ . u:
... l-The Area' represents the commercial core of a neighborhood tthakexhibits, .strbngj ^residentialjviability. Because the contemporary commerciahm
. ^and-strip *ma|l! development, older commercial corridors suffer:due to an inability to; provide 'appropriately sized'lots for new construction and limited space for-existing businesses'to expand! However, recently-the Area has attracted,some moderately-sized retail uses such as grocery stores and pharmacies that have been, able to assemble larger lots for :new development. >The inability of the Area to provide contemporary development1 sites has been: enhanced through the use of development incentives and can be further strengthened to attract more redevelopment opportunities.
;^!Htip, m>'
_ 1"^:;^'': ¦ ** ':*
Sub^e0ti6hib:iRedevelopment Plan Purpo ^a^^fc
¦ ¦¦'fc ¦ l '-y; ¦ 'v tr-".: . . Ssj ,-l§#:;?l^pr''
^Subsection F. Redevelopment Plan ana" Project Activities and Costs, the last sentence is deleted and replaced with ihejollowing: *. y'; ^*Iiii; S- „
The total estimated costs for the activities listed in Table Three are $95,000,000:
Sup1see//pn^ & Conclusions, second paragraph, delete theSrd sentence and
replace with the following: : .
This Plan and the supporting documentation contained in the Eligibility Study included
as Attachment One of the Appendix for the Original Area and as found in.the Plan
Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study, for the Added Area,
indicate that"vthe Project Area on the:; whole has hbt' been subject to growth arid.
- development through investment by private enterprise, and would not reasonably be
anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the Plan. ';.
Section sIlJ * iSegal Description and Project Boundary -
The second sentence of the first paragraph is deleted and replaced withlthe following:
, Since the boundaries of the Area include approximately 326 acres of land, the statutory minimum of 1.5 acres is exceeded.
The first bulleted sentence after the first paragraph is deleted and replaced with the
following: : ;*
o the corridors along Belmont, Central, Fullerton, and Diyersey Avenues^represent a commercial core for the adjacent residential neighborhoods; ¦-¦->¦¦
The second and third paragraphs are deleted and replaced with-the following: '
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 6
14
Bclmbnt/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project . ¦ ¦ ; City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 .. 1 *»*
"" Tfie'co in that together they provide a
^'^pmpjlt^rahge-of shopping alternatives: for residents. The :;Belrriont^Ayenue^ntraj
^-•^l^eriue^^ The TemainderipffBelrnont; *£en"ti$|-
^Fujiertbn,"and Diyersey Avenues'is^ai mix of neighborhqboycbm seryice*uses.
^ ^ifjaramie^ bu^ismbre^myltHfam
!:51 ;in ihalfr^ these^'cprridorsiand '.jseryW-^la^
:'¦¦ >pbp)^brf.i^Bbcaulle^the^ areJn;close: proximity.to one:anpjther^an^ '
each other, ail of-.the ;.c©mddre: jo^etfier act as a cphesiye commercial f; :mixedruse'.
environment providihg .services to residents. Each corridor and; therefore all property in
'""''x the Area will-benefit from a strategy that?addresses the deteriorating,streetscapes arid
" ?';'Wilding^ ;i" % \m^j^i
a The boundaries of the Area are described in the Plan Appendix on Attachment Three «i -;il§galHp§iSi:ipttojn^and are geographically showhcirt the;Plan^Appendixy^ttachmeni
a^^Tw%Ex!^ ;.r:::- :'!sMz ¦¦ " .-fjip^'!3
A listing of the permanent index numbers and the 1998 equalized assessed value (the "EAV") for all properties in the Original Area are provided as 1998 Estimated EAV by Tax Parcel included as Attachment Four of the Appendix. A listing of the PINS and the 2013 EAV for all properties in the Added Area are also provided in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Four - Parcel Listing.
Section III: Statutory Basis for Tax Increment Financing
^Subsections "
In January 1977, TIF was made possible by the Illinois General Assembly through
passage of the Act: The Act provides a means for municipalities, after theiapprbval of a:
redevelopment plan and project, to redevelop blighted, conservation, or:industrial park
conservation areas and to finance "eligible ."redevelopment- project ^costs''" with
incremental property tax revenues. "Incremental property tax" or"iricremental property
taxes" are derived from the increase in the current equalized assessed value ("EAV") of
real property within the redevelopment project area, over, and above the certified initial
EAV of such real property. Any increase in EAV is then multiplied by the current tax
rate;,^ property- taxes^Atfecline in current EAV does, not
result' jh af negative incremental property tax. ^f ;;
To finance redevelopment project costs, a municipality may issue obligations secured by incremental property taxes to be generated within the project*:areaj:^ftinv addition, a municipality may pledge towards payment of such obligations any part or any .combination of the following:
net revenues of all or part of any redevelopment project;
taxes levied and collected on any or all property in the municipality; :' : h
the full faith and credit of the municipality; z^.
a mortgage on part or all ofthe redevelopment project; or
any other taxes or anticipated receipts that the municipality may lawfully pledge.
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PCi^VPLANNERS
Page 7
15
Belmont/Ceritral'.TIF Redevelopment 'Plan and Project'' ™ *¦ City of Chicago'
Amendment No. 2 ""'
TIF does not generate tax revenues by increasing tax rates. It generates revenues by
allowing the municipality to-capture, for a specified period, the new.revenues produced
by the enhanced valuation of properties resulting from the municipality's redevelopment
!pfpgraW^improvements „arid-. activities'^ and1 the
reassessment of ^properties: Ofthis": increase/i^^
? "rebteyelb^ as,; JanrJ-^cquisitibn, siteyiciearance, building
reHabllitatibhr qf-pjjbte^ permitted by
¦'¦ the Act. 4*'^ rr- ¦; jj| -A ;". ' \A iyr, .: .'': ' ^ ; :/r "
Under the Act, all taxing districts continue to-^ the initial
valuation of properties within the redevelopment; project^arefaV: '.'Additionally, taxing districts can receive distributions of excess incremental property taxes when annual, incremental' prbp^^taxesjj^ceived exceed?pnrjci^
year and redevelopment^;project costs neces|ary»tb;jmplemenitpe plah|r|ave' been paid/
Taxing districts also benefit from the increased property tax base after redevelopment
project-costs and:obligatjong^ 'paid. 1 J
As used herein and in the Act, the term "Redevelopment Project^C'Prqject"^ means any
public and private development project in furtherance of the objectives of a
v redevelopment plan. The term "Area" means an area designated by the municipality,
which is not less in the aggregate than T-.1/2 acres and. .in respect to which the
municipality has made a finding that there exist/conditions which cause the area to be
classified as an industrial park conservation area, a blighted area, or a conservation
area, or a combination of both blighted area andi-conservation area. The term "Plan"
means the comprehensive program of the municipality for development or
redevelopment intended by the payment of redevelopment project costs to reduce or
eliminate.' 'those .condition^ of which qualified • the2 redevelopment project
area for utilization of TIF. .-. :¦""¦'¦'"
\ The lllinois-Generaj Assembly madb various findings in adoplting|the' Aj|cts^
1. That there exists in many municipalities within the State of Illinois (the "State") rm:.j:;„. blighted and conservation areas; and :
-.2* That the eradication of blighted areas and the treatment and improvement of conservation areas by redevelopment projects are essential to the public interest and welfare. :::'-'-"
These findings were made on the basis that the presence of blight, or conditions which lead to blight, are detrimental to the safety, health, welfare and morals of the public:
To ensure that the exercise of these powers is proper and in the public interest, the Act specifies certain requirements that must be met before ^municipality can proceed with implementing a .redevelopment plan. One of these: requirements is that the municipality must demonstrate that a redevelopment project area qualifies for designation. With certain exceptions, an area must qualify generally either as:
a blighted area (both "improved" and "vacant" or a combination of both); or a conservation area; or
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PCs^/pLANNERS
Page 8
16
"Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project. City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 '''"y^'k,'¦""'" %:
.Ji r .tf icpnibinatipn ;pt both.: blighted areas: and' conservation areas within the
:S 'V * Jdefihitions for eacfrset'forth in the Act. : \ I- -
¦¦'.?£.>. st l!p~"^ i;;¦ ¦ :;'„. ¦¦ -:-;ii;iS ^ yi;.:.: . ¦ . • • .'
The Act offers detailed definitions of the blighting factors used "to qualify areas. These
definitions^ as the basis for preparing the. Eligibility Study. ^
Subsection B. The Redevelopment Plan and Project for the Belmont/Central Tax Increment Financing' Redevelopment Project Area, fourth paragraph is deleted and replaced' with the following: , t.
This Plan specifically describes the Area ^and; summarizes,the factors identified in, the.
Eligibility Study included as Attachment One of the Appendix for the Original Area
;;--^;*a^^ Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study,
" ; for^^ AdBeai^ea^which qualify the area as a conservation jand/or; blighted area as ; defined by the Act:: >%,,
Section IV. Redevelopment Goals and Objectives
--. Subsection A. General Goals for Belmont/Central Redevelopment Area add the following
r, J&th&lisk:'':'''' .. . """ - • -:. "
' • '-9\'¦«¦'•'' Provide for improved recreatibnalamenities for neighborhpodjresidents.
\SubjsegtionyB . ''¦Redevelopment dbjecth/es,-,item::i. is deleted and replaced with the
:foHowing:::v:^i,:m^ -: ¦ <¦•¦¦¦¦. . ¦,¦ .^^ = ¦'
yt.,r ':0A; Reduce or eliminate Jhqse;s conditions that qualify the Area as a conservation : yy and/or blighted area. These conditions are described in detail in the Eligibility x : r" MgniSjtudy. included asAttachment One of the Appendix for the Original Area and in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study, for the
Added Area. ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ ^i;,,/ ¦:.;<"¦ v
.-Add the following to the list: • *'
Improve building and site conditions at recreational facilities within the Area.
Construction of public recreational facilities. Subsection C. Development and Design Objectives, - ho changes.
Section V. Basis for Eligibility of the Area & Findings
Subsection A. Introduction, the first paragraph is deleted and replaced with the following:
The Eligibility Study included as Attachment One of the Appendix for the Original Area and in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study, for the Added Area provide a comprehensive report that
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^VPLANNERS
Page 9
17
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan ami Project 1 " H City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 ¦ •' -¦: ,...„ .„„,., _ . :.,-^ .»»w^.-^^:.-<-:;. •¦ . '' . ¦,
documents air factors required by the Act to make a.determination that the Area
is eligible under'the; Act, A brief synopsis of these factors is included in this
section. , ; .; '¦¦
Heading Subsection B. Area Background:
1: Location and Size of the Area, is deleted and replaced with the following:'" '
The Project Area is located nine, miles .northwest of downtown Chicago. The northern limits of the Area .along Central Avenue are approximately two miles
" south of the.Kennedy Expressway. The Area consists"of the-Original Area and;
the Added Area and is located within the Portage^ Park and Belmont Cragin?1
¦ ' ' neighborhoods. The Area covers 325.8 acres'in* an .estimated 1,386 parcels:
represented by approximately 1,554 PINS in tax year 2013. The Area is
irregularly shaped with boundaries that follow the commercial corridors along
several major streets. ¦ -*r ¦ ;i" ¦¦ ¦ ¦- lk
,,|; ' .
The boundaries ofdhe Area are described in.the Plan Appendix, Attachment Three - Legal Description and are provided as a map in the Plan Appendix, / Attachment Two, Exhibit A - Boundary Map.*Existin'g.:la|^ses as of the year 2014 are identified in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit B -Existing Land,Use.,
2. Description of Current Conditions, is deleted and replaced with the following:
The Original Arealconsisted} of Ml (full arid:partial)-c%bl^ buildings and
864 parcels covering 189.9 acres. The Added Area consists of 75 (full and
;-™;.;; partial) cjty blocks, 598 buildings on 670 parcels;fcpyering^t35.9 acres. The land use percentage breakdown of the existing uses in the Project Area is provided on Table 1 - Tabulation of Existing Land Use as found below and in the Plan Appendix, Attachments One and Five. Please note that the "Project Area" for the Added Area Eligibility Study is the Added Area referenced in this Plan and r the "Amended Area" in the Added Area Eligibility Study is the Project Area.
Plan Amendment (April 2015) Page 10
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project!' "J,". ' o! City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 .
Tabic 1. Tabulation of Existing Land Use Belmonl/Contrai Amendment No?
¦-<- -rr ¦ .¦ , J'-" « Project Area •• % of Pro ect Onginal Area % ol Onginal Total Amended % ot Totd -. Easing Land Use ¦,¦¦'¦¦'¦>" ;" f . -.i s 3 (acres). Area (acres) Area Area (acres) Amended Area ,
Single^Family Residential 2.5 1.8%' 1 3 0 7% " 3.8 1.2% *'
Multi-Family Residential 12.7 C : 9 3% 35 ¦•:y-.'.i.8%'-.:' '16.2 Yr 5.0%
Mixed-Use (Residential / Commercial) 113 8 3% 13,6 .' 7.2%.^;, ;. ". . " :24.9 ;:;r~ :.' 7.6%
Commercial (Retail/Service / Office) 31.0 22.8% 63 0 :r 33.2%;-S ¦ 94.0 " ' ' ¦ 28.9%
Industrial P;4 ': 0.3% 0.7 0 4% 0.3%
Public y Semi-Public / Institutional 10-8 iU:- 7.9% ¦ 21.4 . ' • :;ii.:3%::.s;» f i3?32:2-. :-
Park / Open Space..... j; >¦ "¦, i:.:s: 11.1 . 8.2% " 6.2 ,::::S. , 3.3% . 5.3%
Public Parking Lot " --.....» :"'"¦ 10 8 *¦ /' 7.9% :¦¦ ¦ 1.1 0.6% ' :~ f:"::"ii;9'' : 3.7%'
utility ¦", ... ¦ -r;'0.4 - ,.- 0.3% 0.2 „, . 0.1% . " 0.6 0.2%
Vacant /.Undeveloped Land '-?'.> ¦V, 1.3% .U 'm 'i.7:::'" :' 0.9% - V 1.1%
Right-of-Way ,-f jss&sw^A \S^*.!43.Tm4;« • 31.7% 772 . ,...i;4b:7:%^; .36.9%
Sj^£'j , TOTAL ..... .. |>. 135.9 189.9 325.8'. . ¦"""; iqb;p%Xe''
• Tit* Prxfact Araa In ths E&'gtbttity Study a' thai Added Area In the neiihnlopaient Plan. 7 Ttij Amended Area hi this EGgibffty Study n tho Project Area or Aims in tho Redevelopment Plan ;:£ftoto::Pvrc*n{affe antoamaga figures arm approximated dua to rounding., „¦ ;
Much of the Project Area is in need of redevelopment, rehabilitation; and revitalization and is characterized by certain existing conservation and/or blighting factors that qualify the Area under the Actr" Factors that were found in both the Original and Added Areas to a major extent are listed below:
Obsolescence - ,|J{S3:;;
In the Original Area, 66% of buildings or parcels exhibited evidence of obsolescence. . Examplesllihclude: -'8tru(^urMk^nJ^i|igi.'^vacant. .space, ¦'• ¦'structures witWdesi their current use, parcels of'limited and narrow size and configuration and obsolete site improvements^
In the Added Area, 3% of buildings exhibited evidence of obsolescence; therefore the factor was only present to a minor extent. *-.
Deterioration
In the Added Area, deteriorating, building conditionsr'were?!qbserved*.on 65% of buildings, deteriorated site improvements found on 36% of parcels, and deteriorated public improvements found on 92% of the sub-areas. Deterioration refers to physical deficiencies or disrepair in, buildings,; site improvements, and public improvements that are not easily correctable in the course of normal maintenance. Examples include: damaged doors and door frames, broken windows, window frames and muntins, dented or damaged metal siding, gutters and downspouts damaged or missing, weathered fascia materials, cracks in masonry walls, spalling; masonry surfaces, cracking on paved surfaces, potholes, depressions, loose paving materials, weeds protruding through the surface, etc.
Plan Amendment (April 2015) Page 11
19
Hclmont/'Cciitral TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project : . City of Chicago (
Amendment No. 2
In the Original Area, this factor was present on 9% of buildings and site
improvements; therefore the factor Was- ohly;prSsint>to a minor extent.
¦ . ¦¦¦ :J -^py-
Excessive Land'Coverage,
In the Original Area, 66% of buildings or site improvements exhibited ^evidence of excessive: land coverage.* Examples of excessive land coveragesidentified in the Area:*included: building or isite improvements exhibiting nearlyy100% lot coverage sanddack; of required off-street parking and loading or service aVeas; ;
In the Added Area, 66% of improved parcels^exhibited evidence of excessive land coverage,,with similar examples as provided above.
Inadequate Utilities ^ . ,-;s^.ftr ., . '".".;
In the Added Area, 100% of the.^sjujbrareas^^^exhibiting sections^of^water
and/or sewer lines that are over 90 years old, according to City records.
^Inadequate; utilities refers to deficiencies|ih^ the,capacity or condition of utilities
, iwhich service /a property or area, including, but 'not* limited 'to, storm water
¦¦:ydjainage|water supply, electrical power^safiita and electricity.
In the Original Area, this factor was not considered.
! bepreciatioh of Physical Maintenance Depreciation of physical maintenance was identified on 80% of buildings and site improvements in the Original Area. Examples observed" included: unpainted or unfinished surfaces, peeling paint, loose or missing materials, cracks in masonry construction, broken -windows, loose gutters and - downspouts, and damaged building areas stiH in disrepair:^ Trashjai^debris was also observed on several sites and several parking lots and paved areas exhibited cracks and potholes in need of repair.
This factor, or the terminology used to describe the conditions related to this factor, has changed in the Act since the establishment of the Original Area, Therei is no finding for this factor in the Added Area. :,
Lack of Community Planning
The-presence of a lack of community planning was observed on 67% of the parcels in the Original Area. This factor is primarily associated with' commercial properties that are located on lots that, are ¦¦¦ too . small to adequately accommodate appropriate off-street parking and loading requirements.
The Added Area has benefited from recent community planning efforts. While there are some conditions that may have been the result of original
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^^PLANNERS
Page 12
20
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
development without the benefitof community planning, overall the Added Area no longer demonstrates this factor for such, a dense-urban environment.
In addition to the above factors, eighty-four percent (84%) of the buildings in the Original Area, and ninety-four percent (94%) of the buildings in the Added Area are 35 years of age or older. Both areas demonstrate other factors found to exist b^bS^vIto a minor extent in each study area as found in the Eligibility Study included as Attachment One of the Appendix for the Original Area and in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study, for the Added i;;.::^...; Area. "r r^.-* %,-, ...... .¦¦:-,„¦¦
¦¦ i"- ~~mm C:; ^ ; ,.'' -,- . ¦ ' . '"'
, The Project Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development " ; through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of this Plan. Age and the requirements of contemporary commercial tenants have caused portions of the Area and its building stock to become obsolete and deteriorated and may result in further disinvestment in the Area.
Revitalization efforts have been initiated for streetscape improvements along Belmont and Central Avenues. The recent sale of the non-profit Our Lady of the Resurrection Hospital campus to the Community First Medical Center benefit corporation is evidence of investment in the Area. This sale will place a significant amount of parcel valuation onto the tax rolls. As of the fall of 2014, there were relatively few vacancies, but building conditions have suffered. These efforts and investment have not been wide-spread enough to raise property values and rents that will encourage building improvement and beneficial use of vacant sites and large buildings.
The City and the State of Illinois ("State") have designated a portion of this section of the community as Enterprise Zone 5 (Exhibit F, Enterprise Zone Map included in Attachment Two of the Appendix). This initiative may bo responsible, in part, for creating some stabilized""pockets" in^a portion of the Area, but has not eliminated further decline. Additionally, the Enterprise Zone designation only covers a small portion of the Area along Fullerton Avenue and is currently in the process of being re-established. The majority of the Project Area does not benefit from the Enterprise Zone program.
-From 1994 through 1998, the City of Chicago EAV increased from $30.1 billion to $33.9 billion according to Cook County records. This represents a gain of $3.8 billion (annual average of 2.7%) during this five-year period In 1994 the EAV of Cook County was $67.8 billion and grew to $78.5 billion in 1998. This represents a gain of $10.7 billion (annual average of 2.8%) during this five-year period. In 1998, the EAV of the Original Area was $81.4 million. This represents an
Plan Amendment (April 20] 5)
Page 13
21
lielmont/CcntralfTIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No: 2'
average annual growth rate of approximately 1.7% during the five-year-period
between 1994 and 1998. therefore, the Original Area grew approximately 39%
slower than Cook County and the City Of,Chicago between 1994 & 1998; The
EAV for the Original Area was also reviewed for the Amendment and found to
have grown to $105:5%iiliion^ million base iri 2001 when
¦ the Original Plah was'appro
shown a decline in 4 of the past 5 years (2009 to 2013) and is demonstrating an
average annual decline of 2:6%. : ^ n; ;
fhj|^I^bJi.iisv,3ls;q^fKpWfi bh ithe 'following page and demonstrates that the AddeldiAr^^
The Added Area EAV has demonstrated a decline from $83.5 million in 2008 to $60.5 million in 2013. In the Plan Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study, the historical EAV data for the Added Area is provided in Table
:2 -. Equalized Assessed: Value Trends.
following page and demonstrates that the Ad ^thelhree thresholds for sub-par EAV growthias^definedMn?the Act^
Table 2
Equalized Assessed Value Trends
: Belmont Central Amendment No 2 PrbjedfArea .
;t
¦¦L
-2008 383,513,633 $80,894,029,387
'2009 $92,854,471 11.2% $84,493,953,218 . 4.5% NO
2010 $86,139,001 -7.2% $82,001,031,062: ;,.».-3.0%: ¦ YES .—
2011 $74,370,268 -13.7% $75,048,543,642 -8.5% YES '
2012 $64,831^405 -12.8% $65,185,555,862 ;;;-i3:iV K
2013 $60,481,662 -6.7% $62,303,394,002 "4.4% : YES .
'Cook County Assessor data compiled by ERSE. 2014.
1 Citywido EAV loss the Project (Added) Area EAV. Source is'Cook County Clerks Agency Tax Hate Hcports tor City &Chicego;,
' " Comparison to Consumer Price Index
• •%CPj-Uchafifle.tor:- ,isM^^nB^ t «;VJ?p»J^'(Addea')change from. CPl-U for CJWcagc^ary.fchir^o^Ga'fy-'^tton thWpM^r'CrtjSl^laryt
2008 $83,513,633 215:303, '¦ .s:<-
2009 $92,854,471 11.2% 214.537 : -0.4% NO
2010 $86,139,001 -7.2% 218.056 1.6% : YES
2011 $74,370,268 -13.7% . 224.939 3.2% YES
2012 $64,831,405 -12.8% 229.594 2.1% YES .......
2013 $60,481,662 -6.7% 232.957 _ 1.5% YES
' Cook County Assessor data compiled by ERSE, 2014
3 Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-Uy source is U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 14
22
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project; "6-Amendment No. 2
" The1Added''Area EAV is demonstrating-that: .: ssi^i1 :
In at least 3 of the past 5 years (four), EAV growth of the Added Area
has declined; " 'u^' w ' ¦ v\jft,—
In at least 3 ofthe past 5 years (three), EAV growth of the'Added Area has been less than the EAV growth of the remainder of the City; and,
'^mh-xayji^ ;;:l: ;.: -...;&/¦ . ' 0/ ' L... . '
3) In at least 3 of the past 5 years (four), EAV growth of the Added Area
f*m: has been less than the CPI-U of the Chicagp-Gary-Kenosha Metropolitan
"¦ ^¦Statistical Area (MSA). ^
The;main factor limiting development in the Project Area is the lack of,sites
; ? :¦ i;ieapab1^^ space and site requirements of contemporary
s:retaiiJdevel6pm
' """" the Area on large site that provide adequate parking and large building footprints more suited for contemporary retail use. Retail-demand for large building footprints rand on-site parking may be causjng some of the Properties in the :Project Area to be less desirable for commercial, uses For many Area properties, building size, building layout and' limited on-site parking is riot suited for large contemporary commerciahtenants. Theiresult iSithatjahnarrower mix?oft commercial uses will seek to occupy the existing4com^e'reiat''bujldings--:in the Area and thereby limit demand for someproperties.: ~ ¦. ; V !
Many buildings are now occupied by "startup'^businesses.i^Asibujldings become available, other such businesses move in.; As. might be expected, some. oHhe .businesses faihthereby creating an ongoing level of turnover in the Area. Once
-•%*^tjrs*5f^e^:pUijdingsLare vacated, it may be extremely,difficulUo.att^
tenants that generate economic activityiComp^rable.witn,--.theicommercial, uses, that were lost. This adds significantly to the view that private market acceptance
i ; i^' of portions of the Project Area is not favorable. - ;;-"Ms:
The documentation provided in this Plan indicates that private investment in revitalization and redevelopment has not occurred. These'cpnditiohs.may-cause the Area to become.blighted in the future. In addition, the Area is riot reasonably expected to have increased stability and be redeveloped without the aggressive efforts and leadership ofthe City, including the adoption ofthis Plan. The City is developing this Redevelopment Plan in an attempt to attract new growth and development by implementing additional capita! improvements/:, in the Project Area. The City will continue street and alley, repairs, repaving, and streetscape improvements along the major commercial corridors, work to: improve building facades and conditions through its existing Small Business Improvement Fund,
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PO^^PLANNERS
Page 15
23
BelmbrityGentrai nniF Redevelopment Plan and Project City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 .„ ,
-and will Improve other publiGally-owned.buildings^ recreational opportunities for area residents;
iSuosection'^yArea-Data and Profile, - no'enang^s^'' *' *;;2i^ls,,'*
¦¦ • ~ - ¦¦ - ¦¦ - mm^m,.-^
Subsection D. Existing Land Use andfZphihgK&haracteffsWs; and replaced
'¦ 'with the following: '¦ "^^M€^miih:^€- '
As noted in Table 1 - Tabulation of Existing Land Use, in Subsection B.,
eS;S Item 2., the largest land use by land percentage in the Project Area (noted-as
P - "Amended Area" on the table) is Right-of-Way (36.9%), followed by Commercial
uses (28*9%), Public/Semi-Public/Institutional (9.9%), f Mixed-use (7.6%),
Residential uses (6.2% total multi-family and single-family), and Park/Open
Space (5.3%). All other uses in the Project Area" account forjless than 6% pf the
v '-"nU.'.; total. The Area includes the recreational uses of Chopin Park, Cragin Park, and
¦ 1 -- Blackhawk Park along with eight school: properties. The majority of property
within the Area is zoned in commerciajlpibu.^ sfiowh'in the
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two* Exhib|tfDj^Exis|ing;Zonin
' There are'some mid-sized^retail ^ and
'; 4 ¦'- ¦¦' grocery stores. The pockets of residential! usaexjsting; in the/Area contain single-
; ;¦/<.;:family and multi-family buildings^br m^ containing
:':;upper-floop;reside'nc^S.- These residential -areas are typically small and are
adjacent to commercial land uses located along the commercial corridors of the
Area. Approximately 6.2% of the total gross land area, not including the mixed-
" ^; ./use structures, is residential. The boundary separating adjacent residential and
;J : ''—;:'• commercial uses is usually an alley. ¦¦ ::m ;:5? :m'
The land use survey and map are intended to focus on the uses at street level which usually are the predominant use of the property. Many of the multi-story 1 buildings throughout the Project Area are mixed-use structures. The upper floors of these buildings are often intended for multi-family use, constructed so that the business owner could live above his shop and maximize the rental income ; *':'-?- potential ofthe building. In the overwhelming majority of these instances, these i ! ,; upper floors experience high rates of occupancy even if the street level 1 commercial space is vacant. The focus on ground floor uses is not intended to minimize the importance of upper-floor uses. Maximum use and occupancy of these mixed-use buildings is, and should be, encouraged. ,
Most arterial streets have parking restrictions that limit on-street parking during peak periods. In addition, the City has created several residential parking zones within and adjacent to the Area to limit on street parking in residential areas through a parking permit program. Within the commercial corridors, limited on-street parking is available. Individual businesses along these streets have narrow
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^WPLANNERS
Page .10
24
Kclmont/Ccntral TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
;!L...-'¦=% street frontage and many buildings cover 100% of their loti, thereby"¦preventing any on-site parkingsor loadirigt ^The*exceptiqn to the condition of limited parking is in the area of the Belmont Avenue and Central Avenue intersection; In this ti i " ;' portion of the Area,"' •a>ypublic^;pawing':-gaVage. is located dh iCentral Avenue immediately south of Belmont Avenue. The garage is located for customers of businesses located near the Belmont Avenue and Central Avenue intersection and contains adequate capacity to accommodate increased business activity in the central portion of the Area; With the exception ofthe parking garage at the Belmont/Central intersection, much of the Area's residents, employees' and / i^<^ "patrohs of Area businesses must park on adjacent streets to access the Area.
Subsection E. Investigation and Analysis of Conservation Factors, an introductory
WW ^paragraphMaddedifc , ...: .r;.
tsiE'aS j iilll The-infqrmation in^hiSjSUbsert^
to the Original Area only. The facbrs- used in qualify
hpted ancl'found in the Eligibility Study included as Attachment"Ofteidf Ihe ¦'f'p -t.- ' i&Appendix fbrlhe OriginaI.:Area:i The following subsections G and H will provide information regarding the qualification factors of the Added Area.
Subsection F. Summary of Findings/Area Qualification, no changes.
- . '. f&yim . ¦¦¦
New Subsection G. Added Area Investigation and Analysis of Factors, is added after
Subsection F. as follows:
G. Added Area Investigation and Analysis of Qualifying Factors
In determining whether the Added Area meets the eligibility requirements of the Act, the same general methods of research were used, along with.the field survey, as were used to qualify the Original Area. Changes in the Act since the Original Area was qualified have occurred. The Act sets forth 13. separate ,, factors that are to be used to determine if an improved area qualifies as a ¦\ ^cqnseryation area" and 10 separate factors (in two tiers) to consider if '^vacant : ¦',. area qualifies ,'as;a "blighted area". Ah area'may'be qualified as a' combination' conservation/blighted area. Additionally, for qualification under, the Act as a conservation area, 50% or more of the structures in an area must have an age of 35 years or more.
For a conservation area, a combination of 3 or more of the, 13 factors must be found to exist such that although the area is not yet a blighted area, it is detrimental to the public safety, health, morals or welfare and may become a blighted area. For a blighted area, 2 Tier One factors or 1 Tier Two factors must be present in the vacant portion of the area. The Plan Appendix, Attachment
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^VpLANNERS
Pago 17
25
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
JFive - Added Area Eligibility Study provides detail on the Act's qualification
^ ;f^i requirements for conservation and/or blighted areas. ? -
New Subsection H. Summary of Added Area Findings/Area Qualification, is added after Subsection G. as follows:
H. " Added Area Summary of Findings/Area Qualification
It was determined in the investigation and analysis of conditions in the Added , Area that the Added Area qualifies as a combination conservation/blighted area under the Act.
' '' " " ' " " ''
As* noted, 94% of structures in the improved portions of the Added Area are 35 -.year^Cofjlage^or older., Having met the age criteria requirement, th&improyed^ portions of the Added Area qualify as a conservation area due to the following 'four conditions: ;-~
pet|riOr|tibn as found in deteriorated buildingsv(65% of buildings), deteriorated site improvements (36% of parcels), and deteriorated street and/or sidewalk pavement (92% of sub-areas);
Excessive land coverage (66% of improved parcels);
Inadequate utilities (100% of sub-areas); and,
: Declining and subpar EAV growth (meets all thresholds). ];
The vacant portion of the Added Area consists of 3.5 acres (1.1% of land area), located on 22 parcels. Although a very small portion of the Added Area, this vacant land is characterized by the following statutory qualifying factors for a "blighted area" under Section 5/11-74.4-3(b) of the Act:
• deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring areas
;:" (100% of vacant parcels); and, v ^ ?^"^/
. ; S • demonstrates declining or subpar EAV growth (meets all thresholds).
Qualification factors for the improved portions of the Added Area, by sub area, are shown in Table 3-1 - Conservation Factors Matrix for Improved Land. Factors for vacant land in the Added Area, by sub area, are found in Table 3-2 -Blighting Factors Matrix for Vacant Land.
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 18
26
Bcimont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and. Project Amendment No. 2
Table 3-1
Conservation Factors Matrix for Improved Land
"•'5, - Belmont / Central Amendment No. ilPtoject Area • <9^*
msKfmSiiMX-y-:S,i' ^I--;!":;*W'. Sub-Aroa ¦ '•A B c tr. DM '-.G V :K' <•»;;; isiasTQTALL:,:;;?;
No. of improved parcels "- ¦; :: * 49 16 23 ' :-s52 Hi: 51 56 56 71 ¦ 85 :¦¦ .51 30 58 - 49 647 97%
No. of vacant parcels j. . 0 0 49 0 "0 2 " 0 . ...0 0 52 52 37|99|0 .0|99999 9| ..3|99|22: 3%
Parcels In R.O.W. |9 9| |9 9 9 99 9 9 9|A I 0%
Total parcels (net R.O.W. parcels) f '¦ 16 25 ;57 "" 57" 56 60 72 88 52 30 61 . .51 669 100%
.Total Parcels 49 16 25 '"" 2.1 56 60 72 45 88 53 30 61 51 670 100%
No. Of primary buildingsT|99|15 46 26 39 52 40 26 38 43 434 7Mt
No. ot secondary buildings|99|13 12 14 :¦. 23 i'Si'B 12 ;;? ?.3 -:si6 ,-' 16 17 12 hdl6 "' 164 ri,;27%
Total Buildings|99|28 33 51 69 :34 61 48 68 ~"'i'56 43 ;i 50 ' " 59 698 : 100%
No.-of buildings 35 years or older y\^:--=;;':ai.; ...,,"6 ~i 25 .:. 30 79 48 . 6SI !32 , 4B 47 66 56 43 46 '"". 52 663 94%
Housing units 30 95 -."86 :" ;53 23 66 , 107 ;216 91 _81 107 ,1,036, , 100%
Occupied housing unKt ^f-it^ri. ~."y~r,!':':y- ;.' >. . 30 79 "' 95 ...82 ' ;.^9 ''66 " 107 1 216 y 91 i:^76 ¦fe-,106 i;c2i, 99%
Sub-Area count.l'!.?'S:*s#:i*>' ¦¦¦?*' " "¦ yy. |999|, ..-.'I ¦ --VS1 ¦ y 1|99|¦;>¦ '.-1 fS:.':1 :?X.A , 13, ,100%
¦i ».:.».' 3No! of deteriorated buildings.|99|15 24 : -31 :-';47 •¦ -1B 35 ... 34 ... -'41 41 32 ¦ 29 13:35 , 66%
No! of parcels wilh sile improvements that are deteriorated . 19|999| 21 1 ¦*23 '20 19 39 34 11 . ".9 e™.;25 C'J 7 "' :2M 36%
Deteriorated street and/or sidewalk pavement (by sub-area)|9999| |99|¦ '.1|99999 9|:..„ *1 ,:";'.1 A2 82%
No. of dilapidated buildingsi : : «|9 9 9 9 9|q d »_„ 0 :0|9 9 9 9 9 9|"Y'O y. 0 ---ii ¦ 0%
No. of obsolete buildings *";'--™-" ¦' '*¦¦¦¦' ' 0|9 9 99| |9 9|, 2|9 999|- ~}Q TIT. 3%
No. of structures below minimum code Not Documented
No. of buildings lacking ventilation, light or sanitation facilities 0] ol 0|9 9|L... sL_j> o| 0 mentei : 0 o|' "-oj j o| - ,| 0%
No. of building with illegal uses . jy Not Docu i . ¦ '¦¦ ms , ¦ ¦
No. of primary buildings wilh excessive vacancies 0 ¦ 7 0 3|99|2 31 ¦-._? 31 . 6 35 5 . ,35|9999|, ,._3 24 ' 4 f '6 61 12%
No. of parcels with excessive land coverage or overcrowding of structures:. . ¦ .... 21 57 62 43 43 ; 36 428 66%
Inadequate utilities (by sub-area) ...|99999|,1|999|.1|999|. .1|99|Jr A '¦¦: - 13, 100%
Deleterious land use or layout (by sub-area)- -" * :: ' '¦ ,'¦-1 ;£;¦-• 0 . 0|9 99 9 99 9 9 9|. i ;:i ¦:4 " 31%
Environmental Clean-up ™ ..|9 9 9|iO|9 9 9|. 0 ,0|9 9 9 9 9|. 0 0%
Lack of communityplanning (by sub-area): „i , .|9 9 9 9| ~ ™ 0 - .0|9 9 9|' -;0|9 9|. 0|9 9|w 0 !? 0%
Declining or Sub-par EAV Growth ': .....™"...-«-is-.'. j: , YES| Are* meets ell thresholds - ":1*J ~~-¦'::."¦"
Table 3-2
Blighting Factors Matrix for Vacant Land
Belmont / Central Amendment No. 2 Project Area
,'.¦.¦*; '.' ... -¦¦ ...y ' Sub-Aroa A B c D E F G H I*' J ¦' K *M ? i TOTAL
No. of improved parcels . - ¦ . 49 16 23 52 51 56 ' i56 :7i 85 51 - 30 9""5B 49 647 37%
No: of vacant parcels|9 9 99 99 9999|:...J :- ¦¦ -,o v:: 2 22 3%
Parcels in R.O.W. v.-; ^ :• f : ' ¦|9 9 9 99|d|9 9|- 0|9 9|: 0|99|. 0 0|9 9|i- 1 - : 0%
Proportion of parcels vacant 0% 0% 8% 0% 11% 57 0% 56 .7% " "eb 1% 3% - s 2% ¦ ¦ 0% • 5% 4% ;* --.'...¦,¦
Total parcels (net R.O.W. parcels) 49 16 25 52 72 88 52 30 61 -.-51 669 100%
Sub-Area count |9999|, 1|99999999|'¦¦': 1 '¦ 1 i.;.->-.;13 -100%
>. 7. wm|9 9 9 9|: :¦;: 0|9 9|;;;.-:o v.; 0
Obsolete Platting (by'parcel) ¦.¦--|9 9 9 9 9|? 0 - 0 ';.' ' 0%
Diversity of Ownership (by sub-area)|9 9 9 9 9|* 0|9 9 9 9 9|; 0|9 9| W 0 0%
Tax Delinquencies|9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 99 99|¦,.::¦ 0 ¦:: -3'4; 1%
Tax Delinquencies (% of vacant parcels) 0% 100% 67% 18%
Deterioration of Struct. Or Site Improvements in Neighboring Areas|9 9 99 99 99999 999|22 100%
Environmental Clean-up NoOetcnnlnatlon -h" ' -
Declining or Sub-par EAV Growth YES, Area meets all thresholds , . . ;
VACANT£^D.f^ORS:fli6r:Mdre)P. 1 ¦ ¦ - $m ^.^^^.^^^
Unused Quarry, Mines, Rail, etc.|9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9|i 0|9 9|: ¦ 0 0%
Blighted Before Vacant|9 9 9|0 0|9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9|0%
Chronic Flooding|9 9 9| |9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9|.0|9 9|0%
Unused or Illegal Disposal Site|9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9|. 0|9 9|. 0 ¦¦• 0 0%
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 19
27
Kclmont/Central TIFRedevelopment Plan andProject City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 - - ... . ¦:.lJ'^'^lSi:.Fi
The number, degree, and distribution -.of ^eligibility factors in the Added Area ^warrant:- i) the-designation of the. improved portion?,pf^the AddedtArea as a conservation: area, and .ii)^the designation of the vacant portion ofrthe-'Added Area as a blighted area as set forth in the Act. Below is a table summarizing the conservationqualifying factors that are found to exist in the Added Area.
[Conservation Area: Statutory Factors - f
";v" ; . Table1 Four :
. : . < Conservation Qualifying/Factors in Added Area
. .EXISTING IN PROJECT.AREA^ - . i: k*vY3J; •* :'.v l'«i:'.r*
Age3 '-. 94% of bldgs. exceed 35, yrs. of age |109|Dilapidation |109|Obsolescence . : Minor extent (3% of buildings) |109|Deterioration --".t*""' ;-: Major extent (65% of buildings; 92% of sub-areas)
Presence of structures below minimum code standards ."" ' ; Z, , ... .,vi-&. |109|Illegal use of individual structures
Excessivevacancies ,'; ... ;V Minor extent (12% of buildings) . „ ;. "•> |109|Lack'of yentilatibh.'iight or sanitary facilities ' "'
Inadequate utilities Major extent (100% of-sub-areas)1*' '.is?: |10 9|Excessive land coverage or overcrowding of structures. Majorextent (66% of buildings) 7
,,ib Deleterious land use or layout Minor extent (31 % of sub-areas)
ii" Environmental clean-up
12 Lack of Community Planning
13 Declining or subpar E.A.V. growth - YES
Notes: r|109|Not including Age as a factor, only three (3)factors are required by the Act to be present for eligibility as a Conservation Area. Seven (7)
factors are verified.present in the Project Area. " , . ...
Except for EAV growth, qualifying factors can be identified as being found to a major extent by their existence on more than 50% of the : structures or sub-areas lri the Area. Three (3) factors were found to exist to a major extent and three (3) other factors were found to
exist to a minor extent: ~ ; * .> ¦ ¦ : ' :J .'k: f ;-
Age, although not a blighting factor for designation, is a threshold that must be present for an area to qualify as a Conservation Area: :¦¦
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 20
Belmont/CentralTIF Redevelopment Plan and Project City of Chicago
Amendment: No. 2 „...,
Below is .actable- summarizing the blighted, qualifying factors that are; found to
exist in the Added Area. ¦ - -':^.LJ-^ '?
B. i , Blighting Factors for Vacant Areas ! ; ; :; " "'-
¦¦ IZ'^J ' . . :i ' TablC FlVC "' .''
Blighting Qualifying Factors in Added Areas
i . FACTOR _ *;, • • _ _ ¦ ' - ' EXISTING IN VACANT/ •: i . UNIMPROVED PORTION/OF AREA.
1, Two'(2) or more of the followin'q factors: i. Obsolete platting - no finding ii: - Diversity of ownership - no finding :. iii.„Tax-ahd assessment delinquencies - minor (Present for 1% of vacant parcels) iv. Deterioration of Structures in Neighboring Areas - YES (Present on 100% of vacant parcels) v. Environmental Remediation - not present K;yj|Beclinin^;prSubpa^^ ¦ ¦ or yes Two (2) factors required, Two (2) are present |109|Area immediately prior to becoming vacant qualified as a blighted improved area; '•* : ' or /. fc > :yr,- |109|Area consists of unused quarry or quarries; or . ¦ "¦¦" ::...:¦ ":7z |109|Area consists of unused rail,yards, rail tracks or railroad right-of-way; . ';. . ,, ,"s or |109|Area prior to designation is subject to chronic flooding or contributes to downstream flooding; or ^ " ' r~
Area consists of unused dr illegal disposal site containing earth, stone. building debris or similar materials; or |109|Area is not less than 50 nor more than 100 acres and 75% is vacant;
Note' The Added Area qualifies per statutory requirements. Only one (1) above the above seven ("/) situations is required, by the Act.:
Although it may be concluded that the mere presence of the stated eligibility factors noted above may be sufficient to make a finding of qualification as a conservation area or a vacant blighted area, this evaluation was made on the basis that the factors must be present to an extent that would lead reasonable
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 21
BelmqntyCeiitral TIE Redevelopment '.PlanI and Project ,City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 ¦ ' ¦ .; . :Hi;- || ;.td . ;:,,,y^',y./-./;^yaA
reasonably distributed throughout the Added, Area. The presence of factors
indicated by the Act include deteriorated, obsolete structures; inadequate utilities;
land usenncompatibilities; deteriorated streets.and sidewalks; declining or subpar
EAV growth; and the predominance of parcels with .excessive land coverage or
overcrowding and may result .in continued disinvestment that" will hot
pvercome^without action by the City. All properties within the Project Area will
.benMitlftOm-the TIF program-... ; - _ :
The conclusions presented in this Plan are those of the Consultant. The local governing body should review this Plan and, if satisfied with'thetsummary of; findings contained herein, adopt8 a* resolution making a finding;of a^cbnservation area for the improved portion of the Added Area and a finding of a blighted area : for the^yacant portion of^ the.Adde^Area and making this Plan a patftpf the public. recp|dtThei ;Added Eiigibility;^udy*anNd survey of the Added Area indicate the requirements'necessary for-designation as a cprnbjnatipn. cons6n^atiph aficl! . blighted;aro|,.are present. Therefore^ the Added Afeaiquaiifies'asi a comblnatioh",,. conservation area and a vacant blighted area, to be included with the Original Area) and?the Amended Area designated; as a rede
eligibleVfo^ under the Act';% \-
',. " ' ' ' ¦ i ¦
Section VI. Redevelopment Plan and Project f ¦ !
Subsection A. Introduction, - no changes. ^^1^
:; Subsection B. Proposed Generalized Land Use^Plari^ihe first pdr^rapJMs deleted and
replacedwith thefollowing: -H i'
The generalized land use plan for the Project Area is presented in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibits C1 and C2. The generalized land use plan is presented in two maps (north and south) to help clearly present the land
,'r'^^f ¦./ use:data.v-
Subsection B. Proposed Generalized Land Use Plan, the numbered list in -the fourth
paragraph is deleted and replaced with the following: ™ - ¦. '
Residential • I
MixedrUse (Commercial / Residential) 71
Commercial °':':X;:r ¦).¦/ f
Institutional
Park / Open Space
Subsection B. Proposed Generalized Land Use Plan, the fifth paragraph is deleted and replaced with the following:
These five categories, and their location on the maps found in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibits C1 and C2, were developed from several factors including: existing land use, the existing underlying zoning classifications,
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 22
30
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
and the land uses anticipated in the future. Of particular consideration, is the transition of . single-family residential units to more intense uses such as multi-family, mixed-use, or commercial use. While the existing land use is the predominant factor regarding the generalized land use plan, it is expected that the conversion of uses that has been occurring will continue.
Subsection C. Redevelopment Projects, Item 2. Public Redevelopment Investment, is deleted and replaced-with the following:
> 2. v Public^ projects and support'- ae^
complement private investment:.; These; may include, but"-'are^'notjiimifed
j to: street•"• improvements;.''* pubjic^Buiiqirig'^ .re^abilitaiibftw(such;\,ras the
r" construction of the Cragin Park Fieldhouse); property assembly and site
preparation; street work; transportation improvement programs and , facilities; public utilities (water, sanitary and storm sewer facilities);
environmental clean-up; park improvements; school improvements;
landscaping; traffic signalization; promotional^
signage and lighting, as well as other programs as may be provided by 1he0ity;and permitted-b^th^
j^ii The; estimated costs associated with ihe eIig|ble,public . redeyelppmieht.
* Investment are "presented in Table .fftree,-. .Estimated ':Rede^ijbpmehi
& Project^Costs' shp.wr(; pry.the:/next':;pageKK Tiiese, Cost^cafegpnes; or
« descriptions have also changeddue to changes in the Act frdm whenithe
Original Plan was approved. The categories and projects presented are . 'necessary to carryf out the capital improvements and to address ihe' additional needs identified in preparing this Plan. This estimate includes reasonable or necessary costs incurred or estimated to be incurred in the implementation of this Plan according to the Act.
¦ ....
The City proposes to achieve its redevelopment goals and objectives for
the Project Area5through the use of,public financing techniquesyincludingg
but not limited to tax increment financing. The City also reserves the right
to undertake additional activities and improvements authorized under the
. .Act "
Plan Amendment (April 2010)
Page 23
31
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project City of Chicago
Amendment No.-2 . . - .
' Table Six '''
- :-rEstimated Redevelopment Project Costs , ,^L,S^A
Activity - Cost
1. AhalysisVAothini^ $ 2,200,000
Demolition'^ and*Environmental Remediation.: $15,600,000
3., • ¦ Rehabilitationtof Existing Buildings;tFixtures and .
, .^Ueasehoidhlmpnovemenhirahp^Rehabilitation costs $ 19,000,000
4. ]' Affordable Housing' ' $ 7,400,000
PublicWorks & Improvement's including Streets and
- Utilities, Parks and.Open Space, and Public Facilities
and Other Public Buildings1'2 $ 37,400,000
Job Training, Retraining, & Welfare to Work %\. $ 3,700,000
Day Care Services ' $ 750,000
:/^pft;^^ocation Costs ¦ ,. ':n h- '' -y$- 750,000
r' 9. Interest Subsidy i -,, j,,Krn-:\:-. $ 8,200,000
Total Redevelopment Project Costs3'4'56,7 $ 95,000,0008
'This category may also include^paying-for or. reimbursing (i) an elementary, secondary or unit schodi'district's increased costs attributed to assisted housing units, -arid (ii) capital costs of taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the Project Area. As permitted by the Act,'to the extentthe City, by,written agreement accepts and approves the same, the City may pay, or reimburse all or a portion of a taxing disfrict'scapital costs resulting from a redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in'furtherance ofthe objectives of this Redevelopment Plan.
2Public improvements may also include capital costs of taxing, districts. Specifically, public improvements as in the Redevelopment Plan and as allowable under the Act may be made to property and facilities owned or operated by the City or other, public entities, as provided in the Act, to the extent the City by written agreement accepts and approves the same, all or a portion of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from the redevelopment projectnecessarily incurred or to be incurred within "a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan:
3The Total Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs provides an upper limit on expenditures and adjustments may be made in line items without amendments to this Redevelopment Plan.
4Total Redevelopment Project Costs exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense, capitalized interest and costs associated with optional redemptions These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total Redevelopment Project Costs.
sThe amount of the Total Redevelopment Project Costs that can be incurred in the Project Area will be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated from the Project Area only by a public right-of-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in the Project Area, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in the Project Area which are paid from incremental property taxes generated in contiguous redevelopment project areas or those separated from the Project Area only by a public right-of-way
If a special service area has been established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act or Special Service Area Tax Law, then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act or
Plan Amendment. (April 2015)
Page 24
Bclniqnt/Ccntral TIF RedevelopmcntPlan arid Project City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 ¦ ' ' ¦¦ ¦ ' ,:--J-1- -'¦'' . % :-'iTi- 'V ;;: ^
¦ All costs are in 2014 dollarssand may be increased by five percent (5%) after adjusting for inflation reflected in the Consumer Price Index 'for All.lUrbankConsumersi.for-: All Items for the Chicago-Gary.Kenosha, IL-IN-WI_ CMSA as published by the U.S: Department of.Labor; or'some_similar index. '/
:K . "These costs are dependent upon the sale of (he-former Our- Lady of the Resurrection Hospital to an entity, such as the
proposed benefitcorporation, that will not be exempt from paying property taxes to the City„as assessed and collected by
Cook County,* Illinois. - ¦ - .
Additional funding from other sources such as federal, state, county, or local grant funds may be utilized to supplement the City's ability to finance Redevelopment Project Costs identified above.
Subsection C. Redevelopment Projects, Item 3. Property. Assembly After the last
paragraph, the following is added: ,ry„ v ¦
n!f ^r^-=— ^hevMousiog Impsict Stucly:("MIS") foUnci in the PlamAppendix; Attachment Six - Housing Impact Study, contains further detail regarding! the location and number of-residential units that may require relocation and the relocation plan for any residents displaced as a result of this Plan. As set forth in the Act, if the redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project area would result in the ; ; displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited residential units and a municipality is unable to certify that,no displacement will occur, the municipality must prepare a housing impact study and incorporate the study in the redevelopment project plan.
The Area contains a total of 1,491 residential units; 456 in the Original Area and ^': v^;,i::i^b35 in the Adde'd ^ea: -Overall, 1,415 :unit^^
Area and 1,021 in the Added Area. The Plan; prQVicles^or|the:development^ redevelopment of several portions of the Area that may contain occupied! residential units. As a result, it is possible that by implementation of this Plan, the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units could
In the eveWihat the implementation of the Plan, results in the removal of residential housing units in the Project Area occupied by low-income households or very low-income households, or the displacement of low-income households or very low-income households from such residential housing units, such -f households shall be provided affordable housing and relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations thereunder, including the eligibility criteria. Affordable housing may be either existing or. newly constructed housing. The City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that this affordable housing is located in or near the Project Area.
As used in the above paragraph "low-income households", "very low-income households" and "affordable housing" shall have the meanings as set forth in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act, 310 ILCS 64/3. As of the date of this Plan, these statutory terms are defined as follows: (i) "low-income household" means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 50 percent but less than 80; percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such adjusted income and median income are determined from time to time by the
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^Vplanners
Page 25
33
IJelrriont/Central.TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project .'City of Chicago;
Amendment N672""-¦„,., •*> s ¦¦¦ .^:,„,, ¦ .... ... ¦¦ .-v,.^,,, >-,,
median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such
adjusted income and median income are determined from time to time by the
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") for
purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937; (ii) "very low-
income household" means a single person/ family or unrelated;perso'ns living;
together whose adjusted income is*.not more than 50 percent of the median
inCdme>pf :th"e .area of residence, adjusted;for family size, as determiried'byj.HUD;^
and :(i^ housing that, so Jong.asihe same"
is bbeupieldibyjpw-income hpuseholds^oriVery-low-income households^requires"
payment of monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, of no
more than 30 percent of the maximum allowable income for such households, as
applicable. - . ^v ;m & ¦
; Subsection^D. Assessment ofFinancial Impact on Taxing Districts:
Remove the paragraphs regarding the Chicago School Finance Authority and the
Cook County Health^Facility;' ' *i yi . yrnqm-
Subsection E. Prior Efforts, - no changes. ; . .
¦ ,,.'¦' ' ¦, , .
Section VII. Statutory Compliance and Implementation Strategy, is deleted and replaced with the following: k
A. Implementation Strategy ^ 1 f! ¦«
The development. and follow-through of an implementation strategy is an essential
element in achieving the success of this Plan. In order to maximize program efficiency
!i7^ : and to interest in the Area, and with full
consideration of available funds, a phased implementation strategy will be employed.
The City may enter into agreements with public entities or private developers, where
deemed appropriate by the City, to facilitate public or private projects. The City may also
contract with others to accomplish certain public projects and activities as contained in
this Plan. , ...
Costs that may be incurred by the City in implementing this Plan may include, without limitation, project costs and expenses that may be eligible under the Act, as amended from time to tjme, including those costs that are necessary and related or incidental to those listed below as currently permitted by the Act.
The various redevelopment expenditures that are eligible for payment or reimbursement under the Act are reviewed below. A list of estimated redevelopment project costs that are deemed to be necessary to implement this Plan were previously provided in Section VI, Table Six Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs.
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 26
Rclmorit/Cchtral TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project
.Amendment Noi! 2 ""' "
In the event the Act is amended after the date of the approvaf^p| this Plan hy the City Council of the City of Chicago to (a) include new eligible redevelopment project costs, or (b) expand the scope or increase the amount of existing eligible redevelopment project r%. costs (such as, for example, by increasing the amount of incurred interest costs that may be paid under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(11)), this Plan-shall be deemed to incorporate rajg; f;v's'uph additional, expanded or increased eligible/Costs;as Redevelopment-Project Costs1 under the Plan, to the extent permitted by the Act. ln the event of such amendment(s) to the Act, the City may add any new eligible redevelopment'prpject costs as a line item in •ym stable ;Six - Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs or otherwise adjust the line ^.^v.Jtem'SjipltabJe.;Six witho^ut^amendment to this Plan; to;the::exteht permittedfb^lhe Act. In •no instance, however, shall such additions or adjustments result;in'Jany increase in the total Redevelopment Project Costs without a further^amendment id this?Plan.
1. Engible^Redeyelopment Costs
Redevelopment project costs include the sum total of all reasonable or necessary costs
$m incurred, estimated to-be incurred, oNncidental to this Plan pursuant to the Act. Such
iLfiy., ^V';(; a) Costs of.= studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, -;implementation,!and administration of the Plan, including but not limited to, staff and professional service costs for architectural, • engineering, legal, financial, planning^ or other services (excludin'giobbying expenses), provided : that^no charges.for professional services are based on a percentage of the tax increment collected; V
b) Costs of marketing sites within the Area to prospective businesses,
- ! ; . - s . developers, and investors;
c) Property assembly costs, including but not limited to, acquisition of land and
. . other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of
buildings, site preparation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground level or below ground environmental. contamination, including, but not limited to, parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, and the clearing and grading of land;
d) Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, or repair or remodeling of existing
public or private buildings, fixtures, and leasehold improvements; the costs of
replacing an existing public building if pursuant, to the implementation of a
redevelopment project the existing public building is to be demolished to use
the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private
investment; including any direct or indirect costs relating to Green Globes or
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^^PLANNERS
PaBc 27
35
Belmorit/Ceritral TIF Redevelopment Flan and Project Amendment-No. 2
LEED certified construction elements or construction elements with an equivalent certification. i
.,;. e),CcSs'of the construction :of public works or improvements; including, any „'direcr or indirect costs; relating to Green Globes3 or LEEDr certified construction .elements or construction elements with an equivalent certification, except that on and after November 1, 1999, redevelopment project costs shall not include the cost of constructing a new municipal public building principally used to provide; offices, storage space, or conference facilities or vehicle storage, maintenance! or repair.;for administrative^ public safety, or publicrworks personnel and that is not intended to replace an existing public building as provided in Section 74.4-3(q) of the. Act unless
." either
(i) The construction of the new municipal-building implemerits-a redevelopment .project that was included* in-a* redevelopment plan that was adopted by the municipality prior to November 1, 1999 or
(ii) The municipality^ ^ a reasonable determination in the redevelopment*plan*'supported by information that provides the basis for that determination, that the new municipal building is required to meet an increase in the need for public safety purposes anticipated to result from the implementation of the redevelopment plan; ! ^> - - -
Costs of job training and retraining projects.ihcludingihei^
work" programs implemented by businesses located within the Area and such
proposals feature a community-based training program which ensures
maximum reasonable opportunities for residents of the'HumDoldtVPar^
Garfield Park, and East Garfield Park Community Areas with particular
attention to the needs of those residents who have previously experienced
inadequate employment opportunities and development of job-related skills
including residents of public and other subsidized housing, and people-with
disabilities; : n
Financing costs, including but not limited to, all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and which' may include payment of interest on any obligations issued hereunder, including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and for not exceeding thirty-six (36) months following completion and including reasonable reserves related thereto.
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^MPLANNERS
Page 28
36
Helmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and,Project Amendment No. 2
?" ¦ h) To the extent the City, by written agreement, accepts and approves the ;! same, all or-a-portioh€of?aj taxing district's -capital costs resulting: from the redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to bejneurred (consistent with ' Statutory requirements) within the] taxing district in furtherance of the ' H ; objectives of the Plan;"and!Rrpject.
:i:^i- ¦ .'ill/-' ¦'. ; . ilX^ * ¦ ¦¦ ¦ ¦ \ ¦•¦ v¦', ;p: ¦¦'. ¦ . ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
sf-i) Relocation costs,™to?the^ exJ;ehtethM^he;City determines that relocation costs iKE S- shall be paid pr is^required to;make*payment of relocation costs-by federal or state law or by Section 74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act (see "Relocation" section);
j) Payments in lieu of taxes, as defined in the Act;
¦¦i;,"":": ¦ ¦ -:- ^;:-
:si3sii id; L&y. Costs of job trainingretrainirigfMadvanced voeatibnar education or^career
education', jncludihg; •bWnpt^iirnited;-;-toi •.courses' iri occupatipnalir semi-
technical or technical fields leading directly to employment, incurred by one or
::i?tpii#^ li-fFmore taxing*'d^stric^ (i) :afe • related :1o>the,
^; establishment and maintenance • of additional job training, advanced
vocational education or career education programs for persons employed or
¦)>M* to be employed by employers located in the Area; (ii) when incurred by a
^; : taxing district or taxing districts other than the City, are set forth in a written
agreement by or among the City and the taxing district or taxing districts,
which agreement describes the program to be undertaken, including but not
* limited to, the number of employees :td;6e trained, a description of the training
and services to be provided, the number and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program and sources of funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the payment by community college districts of costs pursuant to the Public Community College Act 110 ILCS 805/3-37, 805/3-38, 805/3-40 and 8051/3-40.1 and by school districts of costs pursuant to 105 ILCS 5/10-22.20a and ' . 5/10-23.3a; ; " ¦ ' ' * •" - .
1I) Interest costs incurred by a redeveloper related to the construction, renovation, or rehabilitation of aTedevelopment project provided that:
•'; v; i3- . ¦ (i) such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation
fund established pursuant to the Act;
(ii) such payments in any one year may not exceed 30% of the
- annual interest costs incurred by the redeveloper with regard to
the "redevelopment project during that year;
(iii) if there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax
allocation fund to make the payment pursuant to this provision
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^^PLANNERS
Page 29
37
'.Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project -Amendment No. 2
KiH ;theh ?the amounts so due shall: accrue: and be payable when
""*V f" ¦ ' r, sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund;
(iv) the total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may
not, exceed 30%#fttrie; total: (i) Cost5 paid or incurred by the
redeveloper for the redevelopment project plus (ii) redevelopment
^ - project costs excluding any property assembly costs and any
wT^ C relocation costs incurred by the City pursuant to the Act; and
(v) The 30%. interest cost limitation may be-increased to up to 75% of the^ihterest cost incurredjby^redeve^p^^ori'the;:financing of rehabilitated or new housing for low-income households and very ¦ **Affordable Housing Act. .^iaeg&ir :;i^j|j£:;: : - .,., .
m) Unless explicitly provided in the Act, the cost of construction of new privately-owned buildings shall not be an eligible redevelopment project-cost;
n) An elementary, secondary, or unit school district's increased costs
!1" "attributable to assisted housing units will be reimbursed as provided in the
Act; ." ¦ , fpm:-. -
.„;s Qj (jp to 50% of the cost of construction, renovation and/or rehabilitation of all
1 low- and very low-income housing units (for ownership or rental) as defined in
; x ii! ;- Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. If the units are part of a
«^ "s v residential redevelopment project that includes units not affordable to low-
^'rf&fand very low-income .households, only, the lowland very :low-income units shall be eligible for this benefit under the Act; >
p) The cost of daycare services for children of employees from low-income families working for businesses located within the Area and all or a portion of >y ¦:Hz-v?-m<\ the cost of operation of day care Centers establishedby-Area businesses to ¦^fl V-Jr serve employees from low-income families working in businesses located in the Area. For the purposes of this paragraph, "low-income families" means families whose annuar income does not exceed 80% of the City, county or regional median income as determined from .time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
If a special service area has been established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act, 35ILCS 235/0:01 et seq., then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act may be used within the Area for the purposes permitted by the Special Service Area Tax Act as well as the purposes permitted by the Act;
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^/PLANNERS
Page 30
38
Belnibht/Central TIP Redevelopment Plan and Project -ww Amendment No. 2
Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation r,.
the purpose of identifying the most recent EAV of the Area is5 to provide an: estimate of the initial EAV which the Cook County Clerk will certify ifcrijthe; purpose of annually . calculating the incremental EAV and incremental property taxes';of the Area.
The 1998 EAV of all taxable parcels in the Original Area was approximately $81.4 million. This EAV amount, by PIN, is summarized in 1998 EAV by tax Parcel included as Attachment Four of the Appendix. :
' ' - 'Amendment No. 1 in" 2011 . . estimated the 2023 EAV^/ bf ihegOriginal Area at $193i741«}600. Asof 2013;Uhe~EAVoftheiOriginalAreajsJlO^/lj^^
Amendment No. 2 in 2015, provides an added 2013 EAV estimate of the Added Area;
¦:'v $60,900,805. This EAV amount, by PIN, is summarized in the Plan Appendix,
Attachment Four - Parcel Listing. The Added Area is estimated to grow to a 2023
EAV of $158,383,048. Most of the increase in the Added Area EAV is due to the impact
of the former Our Lady of the Resurrection hospital site and improvements; an overall
$113,000,000 fair market value investment in the area. The' estimated EAV is based
upon the sale of the hospital to a property tax paying entity and a valuation by the Cook
Xoun^ as discussed in Ihe^Assissspr's 200& report on.
V' ^ ^Exempt Hospitalsjf If or is instead-made!byia;tax-eXempt entity,
W1$!>prf^the-Asse§slbf«fus^^ estimate for the
^„ *sAdded;Srea, and therefore; the
The EAV is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk, and shall become the Certified Initial EAV from which all incremental property taxes in the Added Area will be calculated by Cook County. |f the 2014 EAV shall become available prior to the date of the adoption of the Plan by the City Council, the City may update the Plan by replacing the 2013 EAV with the 2014 EAV without further City Council action.
Redevelopment Valuation
The 2023 EAV of the Belmont/Central Redevelopment Project Area is estimated at $352,124,648 with an entire-cost budget of,$95,000,000. It is important to note that approximately $32,707,543 of the entire cost budget has already been received from the Original Area, as of 2014. As noted, these estimates are dependent on the details of the former Our Lady of the Resurrection hospital sale, but also include key assumptions including an inflation factor of 1.9%, a state equalization factor of 2.6621, an assumed tax rate of 6.832, and a moderate amount ($3 million residential, $3 million commercial) of redevelopment activity in the Area over the remaining term of the TIF district. Other
Plan Amendment (April 2015) PG^/PLANNERS
Page 31
39
BclmoYii^Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
hew projects, rehabilitation'.- o#exlsj^ rvaluessmay-result^n^sapstantial changes in EAV'ifprJnte/ATea*."'
*^^DJ S Sources of FundsAF= ¦¦ ' ¦ *c*4 fei *irf^ " "'• -
¦|i:tfir; ISf'1'-.j ¦¦¦ ' j ;i'T] ',:u... 4";;;-':, j ;;.{.¦¦.¦";¦
Funds necessary jtP pay for Redevelopment; Project Costs ^and secure municipal
t* ^obligationsissued for such costs are to be derivediprimarilyifromllhcremental Property
;i^;W^ax^r*0ther sources' of "funds-which,; may. be used to pay for Redevelopment|Project
Costs or secure municipal obligations are land disposition proceeds, state and federal
grants, investment income, private financing and other legally permissible funds the City
may deem appropriate. The City may incur redevelopment project costs which are paid
for from funds of the City other than ?in'crei^elita! ;'|aj^g"^nd the City may then be
reimbursed from such costs from incremental taxes. Also, the City may permit the
utilization of guarantees, deposits and other forrnsiOfiSe^ available by private
sector developers. Additionally, the City may utilize revenues, other than State sales tax
• increment-revenues/ received under 'the-'Act from one redevelopment prpjeetgarea for
•' eligible costs in another redevelopment project area that is either contiguous to, or is
•separated only by a public;right-of-way frompthelredevelppmentiprojectarea from which
• "revenue is received.1 - ".".<*
"' '-" Portions of the Redevelopment Area *are •contained: in the /Belmont Gentral^Special Service Area (SSA) #2, which was established Jn^i^^G^'sjitb'e:sjecpnd^SA in the City of - ; -Chicago. Belmont Central SSA funds are useds*tb;^h^ improvement programs, maintain the commercial district, and to provide free parking in the neighborhood for customers of neighborhood businesses. In 2011, the SSA had a budget of $613,850 and is managed by the Belmont Central Chamber of Commerce.
The Project Area is presently contiguous to five Redevelopment Project Areas:
the Belmont/Cicero Redevelopment Project Area (T-82); a vl
the Northwest Industrial Corridor RedevelopmentfRroject Area (T-64);
the Diversey/Narragansett Redevelopment Area. (T-129);
the Galewood/Armitage Redevelopment Area (T-71); andf^l;/:
the West Irving Park Redevelopment Area (T-83).
¦° ' ¦ rM
The Area is currently, and may in the future, be contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, other redevelopment .project areas created under the Act. The City may utilize net incremental property taxes received
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 32
40
l'Jclniont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project ¦
Amendment No. 2 , .1 ™
withirj the Area, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in this Plan.
The Area may become contiguous to, or be separated only by aVpublic-right-of-way from, redevelopment project areas created under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law (65 ILCS 5/11-74.6.1-1, et: seq.). If the City finds that the goals, objectives, and financial success of such contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, are interdependent with those of the Area, the City may determine that it is in the best interests of the City an^JnJ^ftHerahce" of the purposes of theJ Plan that net revenues from the Area be made available to support "any'spch 'redevelopment project areas, and vice versa. The City thereToreipropos utilize net incremental revenues received from the Area to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs (which are eligible under,the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law referred to above) in any such areas, and;vice versa. Such revenues may be transferred or loaned between the Area and such areas. The amount of revenue from the Area so made available, when added to all amounts used to pay eligibte.^development/P^e^|.;Costs within the/Area-br other areas as described in the preceding paragraph, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in Table Six of this Plan.
.Hs E.,, Nature and Term of Obligation and Completion of the Redevelopment Plan
The City may issue^ obligations ^secured by Incremental , Property Taxes pursuant to Section 11-74.4-7 of the Act. To enhance the security of a municipal obligation, the City may pledge its full faith and credit through theiissuance of general obligations, bonds. Additionally, the City may provide other legally permissible credit enhancements to any obligations issued pursuant to the Act.
The redevelopment project shall be completed, and all obligations issued to finance
redevelopment costs shall be retired, no later than December 31 of the-year in which the
payment to the City treasurer as provided in the Act is tp/be made with respect to ad
valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year following the year in which the
ordinance approving the Redevelopment Area is adopted (by December 31, 2024). Also
the final maturity date of any such obligations which are issued may not be later than 20
years from their respective dates of issue. One or more series of obligations may be
sold at one or more times ih^oTder to jmplement this Plan. - Obligations may be issued on
a parity or subordinated basis. - ^ ^ , ¦<*¦¦,?. -,
In addition to paying Redevelopment Project Costs, Incremental Property Taxes may be used for the scheduled retirement of obligations, mandatory or optional redemptions, establishment of debt service reserves and bond sinking funds: To the extent that Incremental Property Taxes are not needed for these purposes, and are not otherwise required, pledged, earmarked or otherwise designated for the payment of Redevelopment Project Costs, any excess Incremental Property Taxes shall then
Plan Amendment (April 2015)
Page 33
Belmont/CeritraLTIE Redevelopment Plan and Project City of Chicago
Amendment No. 2 " "¦¦ >: :' ¦ ¦¦¦ R, h^-^'h.
5 become.available for distribution annually to taxing districts having jurisdiction over the Areaiih^thermahher provided by the.Act! "" : , ¦ - ""-«
F., . .Commitment To Fair Employment Practices and'Affirmative Action-Plan
; < /The; Gjty^is ,committed will affirmatively.^implement the fbllpwingl-principles withv
"¦¦ . :resp9d4oit)aiSi.Rlahr«j ' , -f - ¦
lM; l^.^the<.assuranceipfj.ec|ual-.opportunitytin,:all. personnel and employment actions»with ,¦:•. " respectto.the'Redevelopment Rroject, including-but not limited;to-hiring; training^ .'transfer, . promotion; discipline, fringe s-benefits, salary,- employment working * COnditions*j termination, etc., without regard to race, color, religion,; sex, age, disability, .national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, military discharge status, source of income, or housing status! -
, 2. „ Redevelopers must meet City of Chicago standards for participation of the . currently, required;, percentage of . Minority-owned Business Enterprises and Woman-owned Business Enterprises and the City Resident Construction Worker Employment Requirement as required in redevelopment agreements.
; 3;- This commitment to affirmative action and nondiscrimination will ensure; that all
members of the protected groups are sought out to compete for all job openings
and promotional opportunities. ¦ > ;
. 4^-" ,;Redeveloperswill meet City standards forany applicable prevailing wage rate as -ascertained by the Illinois Department of Labor to all project employees.
: ;jnie^Gity^shaJ[-;haye the;-;iight-in'its sole discretion to exempt certain; small'businesses, '.'. jesider^iajfpro
;,G.;, Amending the Redevelopment Plan
This Plan may be amended in accordance with the provisions of the Act. ry
¦< :i.t
H. Conformity of the Plan for the Area To Land Uses Approved by the Planning Commission of the City
This Plan and the Project described herein include the generalized.land uses set forth on the Generalized Land Use Plan, as approved by the Chicago Plan Commission prior to . the adoption of the Plan by the City of Chicago.
Plan Amendment (April 2015) Page 34
42
Amendment No. 2
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project City of Chicago
t"
I. . City Policies : -
The City may incur redevelopment project costs which are paid for from funds of
the City other than incremental taxes and the City may then be reimbursed for*,
such costs from incremental taxes. \.r: ¦.
The City requires that developers who receive TIF assistance for market rate housing set aside 20% of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Planning sah'd Development. Generally, this means the affordable for-sale units should be priced at a level that is affordable to persons earning no more than 120% of the area median income, and affordable rental units should be affordable to persons earning no more than 80% of the area
¦ ai; 'median income. ¦ ¦ .
The City may enter into redevelopment agreements or intergovernmental agreements with private entities or public entities to construct, rehabilitate, renovate or restore'private or public improvements on one or several parcels (collectively referredito as''Redevelopment Projects").
The City will pursue their overall goal of employment of residents within and
surrounding the Area in jobs in the Area and in adjacent redevelopment project
areas. In this regard, the following objectives are established to meet the goals
of the Plan and Project: f s> ;::%
Establish job readiness and job training programs to provide residents within and surrounding the Area with the skills necessary to securejentry level and permanent jobs in the Area and in adjoining Areas.
Secure commitments from employers in the Area and adjacent Areas to interview graduates of the Area's job readiness and job training programs.
The above includes taking appropriate actions to work with Area employers, local
community organizations, and residents to provide job readiness and job training
programs that meet employers hiring needs. - , r
Plan Amendment (April 2015).
Pag'' 35
43
Attachment Two, Exhibit A Boundary Map
Belmont / Central Amendment No. 2 Cily of Chicago, Illinois
44
45
46
47
48
49
W Henderson St
Attachment Two, Exhibit Gl Existing Conditions
Belmont / Central Amendment No. 2 City of Chicago, Illinois
Attachment Two, Exhibit G2 Existing Conditions
Belmont / Central Amendment No. 2 City of Chicago, Illinois
51
O
X
LU -
> .t:
c o
4) U
E at
_c c
u —
O v>
< UJ
If;
o
Z
E ; c
E o < J
1 g> (3 5
- u
CD (J
52
53
Attachment Two, Exhibit G5 Existing Conditions
Belmont / Central Amendment No. 2 City of Chicago, Illinois
54
X
LU
o Z c £
13
III
U y \ In - U o o
_§ >.
QJ
^1
c o
u
?
<
o U E
55
56
PLAN APPENDIX " ::V-r ¦¦¦ -
Attachment Three - Legal Description . . > ¦ .
: ; -:r- ~. : .¦¦ ¦ v- ¦ ' : -
^ BELMONT/CENTRAL TIF REDEVELOPMENT AREAC,, i,/ ^
^ ¦ ' ¦ ;M;; - ' :'. yyHW£iSS f-:-¦ ¦^ ¦¦h;V.~-
, ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 20, 21, 28, 29, 32 AND 33TOWNSHIP 40 N0RTH, RANGEi£3 EAST OFiTHE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF
CENTRAL AVENUE WITH THE NORTH LINE OF BERENICE AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH.ALONG SAID WEST, LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE
TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 18 IN BLOCK 1 IN FRED BUCK'S SUBDIVISION IN THE NORTH X OF
THE WEST % OFTHE NORTHWEST )*OF SECTION 2VAFdRESAlb~;SAID,NORTH UNE OF LOT 18 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE ALLEY NORTH OF GRACE AVENUE; THENCE EAST/A^ THE NORTHtGlNE OF LOTi,18JN;.
BLOCK;^IN SAlb'FRED BUCK'S SUBDI^
CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE^SOUTHlM ^ LINE OF LOT 18
BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OFTHE ALLEY fjlQRTH frfcWAVE^
¦'ALL'EY NORmp EAST LINE^OF.'LOT lS'lN^ ;.
;BUCK^SUBDrvlsiOr>S; THENCE SOUjtf/XUDlffe^ AND THE EAST. LINE;OF Lbti^lN SAIp.BLOCK;3:iN
FRED/BUGkis SUBbiiv'isiON TO THE NORTH UNCQF^WAVl^D-AVENpErTHENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF,,' ,i;
WAVeLAnD^AVENUE NORTHERLY:EXTEN^ON OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 39 IN KOESTER AND ZANDER'S NORTH
CENTRAL AVENUE SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH % OF THE WEST % OF THE NORTHWEST 34 OF SECTION 21 AFORESAID, SAID
WEST UNE OF LOT 39 BEING ALSO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE
EAST UNE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF NEWPORT AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF NEWPORT AVENUE TO THE WEST UNE OF UNDER AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF UNDER
AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF CORNELIA AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF CORNELIA AVENUE TO THE
EAST LINE OF LONG AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LONG AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF ROSCOE
STREET; THENCE WEST; ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF ROSCOE STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF UNDER AVENUE; THENCE NORTH
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF UNDER AVENUE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 6 IN FRED BUCK'S PORTAGE PARK
SUBDIVISION OF LOTS,B;&:C:OF PARTITION OF THE WEST;)4 :OF THE SW;>4 OFSECTION 21 AFORESAID;?HENCE WEST ALONG
THE SOUTH.LINE OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 6 IN FRED BUCK'S PORTAGE PARK SUBDIVISION AFORESAID TO.THE WEST LINE OF SAID • „
LOT 4 BEINGAN ALLEY LYING WEST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF AN
•ALLTiY LYING; WEST OF^ LOT;9;IN BLcSck 6 IN FRED BUCK'S .
.PORTA(3&pMk SUBrjM OF AN ALLEY.LYING NORTH-OF ROSCOE STREET; - ;
THENCE WEST ALONG AN EASTERLY EXTENSI6NibFiTHE N0RJH LlN E 0 F LOT 9 BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING -NORTH OF ROSCOE STREET TO THE NORTHWEST'oORNER OF LOT 27 li\i BLOCK 4 IN RESUBDIVISION OFJ.E. WHITE'S ADDISON GARDENS, BEING ALSO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THFNCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF ROSCOE STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF ROSCOE STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 7 IN STOLTZNER'S CENTRAL AVENUE SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN THE SUBDIVISION OF LOTS D, E AND F IN THE PARTITION OF THE WEST 54 OF THE SOUTHWEST 54 OF SECTION 21 AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH t ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 7 IN STOLTZNER'S CENTRAL AVENUE SUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 14 AND 15 IN SAID STOLTZNER'S CENTRAL AVENUE SUBDIVISION, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOTS 14 AND 15 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OR THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF ROSCOE STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OFTHE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF ROSCOE STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 11 IN SAID STOLTZNER'S CENTRAL AVENUE SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 11 IN STOLTZNER'S CENTRAL AVENUE SUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 30 AND 31 IN SAID STOLTZNER'S CENTRAL AVENUE SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH UNE OF SCHOOL STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SCHOOL STREET TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT1 IN WM. S. FRISBY'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 1 IN HIELD AND MARTIN'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS b AND 6 IN THE SUBDIVISION OF LOTS D, E AND F IN PARTITION OF THE WEST )4 OF THE SW /« OF SLCI ION 21 AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND.THE EASTLINE OF LOT 1 IN WM. S. FRISBY'S SUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OFTHE^WEST 150.75 FEET OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 1 IN HIELD AND MARTIN'S SUBDIVISION AFORESAID;5AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST 150.75 FEET OF LOT 2 IN BLOCKil IN HIELD AND MARTIN'S SUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 150.75 FEET OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID HIELD AND MARTIN'S SUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 INj. BLOCK 2, SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF BELMONT AVENUE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 68 IN R.A. CEPEK'-S SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHWEST U OF THE SOUTHWEST % OF THE SOUTHEAST % OF SECTION 21 AFORESAID;
Attachment Three, Page 1
57
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAJD NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 68 IN R.A. CEPEK'S SUBDIVISION TO THE -
NORTH LINE OF BELMONT;AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF BELMONT AVENUE TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 71
IN SAID R.A. CEPEK'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 71 IN R.A. CEPEK'S SUBDIVISION AND
ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOFTOTHE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 51 IN SAID R.A. CEPEK'S SUBDIVISION, SAID SOUTH •
LINE OF LOT 51 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH
LINE OF THE ALl"EY;'nORTH OF.BELMONT AVENUE TOTHEWEST LINE'OFiEGLAIR.VkVjN^ ALONG! SAID/WEST
LINE OF LECLAIRE:Av|nUE TOTHE NORTH LINE OF LOT 44;iN,STEVEN'S BELMONT S-LARAMiE AVENUE SUBDIVISION OFiBLOCK
16 IN FALCONERfs'^Dl jfo j CAGO; A SUBDIVlSlO N CFTHE NORTH H OFiTHEiNORTHEAST Y. OF SECTIO^-2£gAF^ESAIp; ;
SAID NOr^TH UNE ^
ALONG5AID SOUTHiuj^^FiTHE ALLEY LYING SOUTH:OF BELMONT AVENUE ToShEjWESJ-:LINE OF;LARAMIE AVE^EglHENCEEH, !
SOUTH ALONG THE^TlfedF LARAMIE AVENUE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF. LOT 11 IN THE HULBERT FuJ^RTON .' .
AVENUE HIGHIANpS^SpBDiVlSION #27 BEING' A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THElAST^fOgTHE NW )4 OF SECTION;^|^;:
AFORESAID; tHENG£V?EST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 11 IN THE HULBERT;FULL|RT^^VENUE HIGHLANDSS%j5iviSlt%
#27 AFORESAID TOLjHE;WEST; LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING WEST OF LARAMIE AVENUE-^ENCiNqRJH ALONG THE w|||lINE 0%fi
AN ALLEY LYING WEST OF LARAMIE AVENUE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT l"IN;THE^^^ AVENUE• '
HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION #32 BEING A SUBDIVISION INTHE EAST K OF-THENWX OF:SAID;SECTION!28^ BEING ALSO^ifH^yTH^- — LINE OF tH|ME^LVlNG;SOUTH OF BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE-WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHsUNEiO^^
0EiBElIvIONTAVENUE'TOTHESO.ln>jERLY.CXTENiypWiO^^Ej^^^UNE'OFLOT22 INTHEfHULBERT FULLERTONA^NUE/™
HTGHLANDS SUBDIVISIONNOrgHWEST^;pF^eT|0N:28 AFORESAID^^NjE^ m.
••:N6RTH;AtpNG;^0.M%^ERljYEXTENSION AN D TH E"EAST-Li NE OF LoJ&p^
SUBDiyiSl6N-M&33TO fHE SbUTH LINE OF BELMONT^AVENUE; THENCEWEStALONG SAID SOUW W. BELMONT- . ¦¦Z—l
AVENUE TOTHE EAST LINE OF LOCKWOOD AVENUE; THENCESQUTH ALO^SAID EAST-LlNE OF LOCKWOOD AVENUETOTHE *™ ^
NORTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN THE HULBERT FULLERTON AVENUE HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION NO. 32> A SUBDIVISION IN THE:EAST J4«
OF THE NORTHWEST.!*pFtsECTIo1Ii28 AFORESAID, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 15 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY ? J
LYING SOUTH OF BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE WESF ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF BELMONT AVENUE TO
THE WEST LINE OF LOT43 IN BLOCK 1 IN KENDALL'S BELMONT & 56™ AVENUE SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST K OFTHE }i -
NORTHWEST % OF SECTION 28 AFORESAID, SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 43 BEING ALSO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF
CENTRAL AVENUE;^ENCE SOUTH :„.-...
OFIOT15 IN;BJ,bC^3;W^ t -: _
ACRES OFfHE^Esf;>4ibFTHE-N^
NORTH LINE OFTHE ALLEY;LYIN THENCE EAST ALONG S^ LINE OFJHE JlLEYjLYINGt
NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE!'TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST U^OFjS^lJlj^SAJD BLOCK 3 IN J^WrtiTE'sl FIRST DIVERSEY PARK ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE WEST LINE OF LOTION BLOCK 3 IN J.E.WHITE'S FIRST DIVERSEY PARK ADDITION TOTHE NORTH LINE OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF DIVERSEY AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF LOTUS AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOTUS .; AVENUE TO THE NORTH©NE^OEAN;ALLEY LYING NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG^TFIEjNORTH UNEjpFAN ALLEY LYING NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 60 IN THE HULBERT FULLERTON AVENUE HIGHLANDS *n-SUBDIVISION #22 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST Y> 01 I HE NW Ya OF SECTION 28 AFORESAID, ALSO BEING THE , - ^ WEST LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING WEST OF LARAMIE AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING-WEST. :i -OF LARAMIE AVENUE TOTHE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 36JN THE HULBERT FULLERTON AVENUE HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION #27 AFORESAID; THENCE EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT36 fN THE^ULBERf FULLERTON AVENUE HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION #27 AFORESAID AND CONTINUING ^.v -T EAST ALONG,THE:EASTERLY EXTENSION OF SAID NORTH UNE OF LOT 36 TO THE EAST LINE OF LARAMIE AVENUE; THENCE^W ' NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LARAMIE AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 20 IN BLOCK 14 IN FALCONER'S SECOND Q ' ADDITION TO CHICAGO BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTH V, OF THE NE V. OF SECTION 28 AFORESAID, BEING ALSO THE . NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING NORTH OF WOLFRAM STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF WOLFRAM STREET TO THE NORTIIFRI.Y EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK 14 IN FALCONER'S ,.a SECOND ADDITION TO CHICAGO AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK 14 IN FALCONER'S.SECOND ADDITION TO CHICAGO TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WOLFRAM STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF WOLFRAM STREET TO THE EAST-LINE OF LARAMIE AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LARAMIE AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 21 FEET OF LOT 36 IN BLOCK 13 IN FALCONER'S SECOND ADDITION TO CHICAGO AFORESAID; THENCE < SOUTH ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 21 FEET OF LOT 36 AFORESAID TO THE NORTH LINE OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DIVERSEY AVENUE-TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 28 IN BLOCK 12 IN FALCONER'S SECOND ADDITION TO CHICAGO AFORESAID; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 28 TO THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING-NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE
Attachment Three, Pago 2
58
VACATED ALLEY LYING WEST OF CICERO AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG Till- NORTHERLY EXTENSION OFTHE CENTER LINE.OF
THE VACATED ALLEY LYING WEST OF CICERO AVFNUE TO THE NORTH LINC OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG THE, . . , . :
NORTH.LINE OF DIVERSEY AVENUE TO THE.INTERSECTION W EAST LINE OF AN;ALl|Yi:tjk-A
LYING WEST'OF-cTcERO AVENUE; THENCE SOU^ OF.THEEA^TaiNE OF AN ALLEYLW^5;
WEST OF CICERO: AVENUE TO THE EASTERLYEXTENSlbtfOFOfHE;SOUTH LINE OF AN ALLEY; LYING .NORTH OF PARKER/AVENU.E;¦Zt
THENCE WEST;ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OFjME SOjIJTHaiNE ALLEY LYING N0r\A.iOF PARKER AVENUE TOTHE : v.nyr-y
EAST-LINE OF ANrALsLEY,LYING EAST OF LARAMIE%AVENUE;OT THE EAST LINeJoF AN,ALLEY LYING EASt|oF: ,,. :¦ ;- •¦-
IARAMIE AVENUE TO THE SOUl H LINE OF WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE TOTHE WEST LINE OF LARAMIE AVENUE;:THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LARAMIE AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 36 IN THE HULBERT FULLERTON AVENUE HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION #20 IN THE EAST Y, OF THE SW Ya OF SECTION 28 AFORESAID; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 36 IN THE HULBERT FULLERTON AVENUE HIGHLANDS '.-lyr SUBDIVISION #20 AFORESAID TO THE WEST LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING WEST OF LARAMIE AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING.WEST OF LARAMIE AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINEpF.WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE; THENCE WEST -ALONG THE -SOUTH LINE'OF WRIGHtWOOD AVENUE TO THE WEST.LINE OF LOCKWOOtf AVENUE; TH ENCE NORTH ALONG THE ., . WEST LlNE°OE; LpCKWOjOD AVENUE TO THE N0RTH LINE ORDRUMMOND PLACE;:THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTHILINE OF ', " ;,!3 ™" DR^MMpND" P*LACE TOiTHE WEST LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING^SToSlARAMIE AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG JHE^WEST .. LlNE OF AN ALLEY LYING TH'iriiaE;^
AVr^UE;THENCE SOUTH AL p; I] j
ALONG.SAlb NpRT^ OFTHE WEST- Ll N E QF LOT 6 IN^EE r^Y^S J; ¦ y
RESUBpiyisTo^ OF BLOCK 7 IN C.N.:COUCjCS*R¥sU SOUTH[ ALONG SAlp-NORTHERLY*,.; ^ X
EXTENSION AND THE;WEST LINE O^ EXTENSIONTHEREb ¦
THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 30 IN BLOCK 7 IN AFORESAID C.n! LOUCK;S.RESUBDIVISION, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 30'BEING ALSO ] ] THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEYLYING NpRTH'OF SCHUBERTAVENUE; THENCEiWEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY ; LYING NORTH OF SCHUBERT AVENUE TOTHE EAST;UNE;OF cIn^
CENTRAL AVENUE,TO THE NORTH LINE OF SeHUBrrRTAVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH^U'NeJo^SCKUBER^V^UE ~
TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 19 IN FOREMAN AND LANNING'S RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK^ifV
WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE ADDITION TO CHICAGO IN THE WEST 54 OF THE SOUTHWEST 54 OF SECTION 28 AFORESAID; THENCE
SOUTH ALONG^^ AND THE WEST LINE OF LOT 19 IN FOREMAN AND LANNlNG?S;RJESUBDIVISION;:f„
AND ALONG^THESOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN THE „»_ -
RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 25 TO 32 IN FOREMAN AND LANNING'S RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 6 IN WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE
ADDITION TO CHICAGO, SAID NORTH UNE OF LOT1 ;BE)nG^LSQJHE SpLTHH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF SCHUBERT
AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND'TH^ OF LOT 1 IN THE RESUBDIVISIONOF LOTS 25 ¦¦:
TO 32 IN FOREMAN AND LANNING'S RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 6 IN WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE ADDITION TO CHICAGO TO THE EAST LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF. CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 25 TO 32 IN FOREMAN AND LANNING'S RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 6 IN WRIGHTWOOD'AVENUE ... , ADDITION TO CHICAGO; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF 10 THE WEST LINE OF LOT 6 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION, SAID WFST LINE OF LOT 6 BEING ALSO THE EAST -', LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF
CENTRAL AVENUE AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SOUTH LINE OF DRUMMOND PLACE; THENCE L., .,. ,:
WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF DRUMMOND PLACE TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 23 IN BLOCK 5 IN WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE r
ADDITION TO CHICAGO, A SUBDIVISION OFTHE NORTHWEST Ya OF THE SOUTHWEST X OF SECTION 28 AFORESAID; THENCE
SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 23JN BLOCK 5 IN WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE ADDITION TO CHICAGO, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 23, SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 23 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY.LYING NORTH OF: WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE TO T.HE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 26 IN SAID BLOCK 5 IN WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE ADDITION TO CHICAGO; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE EAST LINE OF LOT 26 IN SAID BLOCK 5 IN WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE ADDITION TO CHICAGO TO THE NORTH LINE OF WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE . TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 4 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHWEST-54 OF . . THE SOUTHWEST Ya OF SECTION 28 AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE EAST LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 4 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION , OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 11 IN SAID BLOCK 4 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 11 BEING ALSO THE \s SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY f LYING SOUTH OF WRIGHTWOOD AVENUE TO THE EAST LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF N. CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 18 IN SAID BLOCK 4 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID , SOUTH LINE OF LOT 18 IN BLOCK 4 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 38 AND 39 IN SAID BLOCK 4 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION, SAID WEST LINE OF LOTS 38 AND 39 BEING ALSO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST
Attachment Three, Page 3
59
OF CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF ALTGELD^ LINE OF aLtGELD STREET TO
THE EAST LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID FAST LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF, LOT
14 IN BLOCK 5 IN SAID HOWSCR'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE. OF 101 44 IN BLOCK 5.IN SAID
HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION AND ALONG f HE EASTERLY EXTENSj^ LINE OF LOTS 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 5
IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION, SAID WEST LINE OF LOTS 3 AND 4 BEING ALSO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF 1
CENTRAL AVENUE;-THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAIDtAsfM'NE^^ EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE EASTERLY
EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 40 IN SAlbBLOCK^fN^ THENCE WEST ALONG SAIDEASTERLY
EXTENSION AND THE SOUTH LINE OF.LOT 40 IN SAID BLOCK 5 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF CENTRAL
AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH; ALOI^G SAID EAST LINE OF N. CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT35 IN SAID 8LOCK 5 IN
HOWSER'tfSU'^ EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE'6r|^IP35 IN BLOCK 5 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION AND
ALONGTHE- EASTER& ExflNliONTH.EREOFTO THE WEST Ll NE -QF ^OTS!*i2 AND 13 IN5AID BLOCK 5 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION; SAID WEST LINE OF: LO^
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF/CENTRAlAVENUE TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE
SOUTH LINE OF LOT 33 IN SAID BLOCK 5 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND
THE SOUTH IINE OF LOT 33 IN SAID BLOCK 5 IN HOWSER'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE
gSOUTH'ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE.TO jte IN SAID BLOCK 5 IN HOWSER'S .
SUBbl^ OF LOT 29 BEING"A^p^Ji'O^UNE O^THE' ALEEY LYING NORTH OF FULLERTONjAVENUE; --.„
'THENa-EASTrALp^ LINE OF THE ALL|fLY£N^%'ORf HTC)^ FpLLERTON AVENUE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY;. ...
EXJENsfeN TH EREOF=TO*tHE^EAST LINE OF LONGiA%NU(^pjjE SAID EAST^INE OF. LONG*AVENUETp'THE:^¦
• NORTHUNEYo'f^^^ THENCE EAST ALpNG^SAlp^NORW AVENUET.O THE WEST LINE OF/-; '}
LQRE'L^AVENUE;THENffi^
OFlLOp23 INjBLbcp'lN*DJCk1y BAKER'S AppiTiONltO OF THE SOUTHWEST Jl OF THE " . ¦
SOUTHEAST >* OFT^
.' SOUTH LlNE 0F LOT 23 INsBLdCK-l IN P!CKEYsAND^BAkE^ LINE OF SAID LOTt23; SAID EAST
LINE OF LOT 23 BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE'bF^TH^EALLEY LYIN&WEp^^^ NORTH ALONG SAID
WEST LINE OFTHE ALLEY LYING WESTpF^LpCkwOOD AVENUE TO THE WESTERLYsE^ENSION OF THE SOUTH Ll NE Of 'LOT 16 IN
SAID BLOCK 1 IN DICKEY AND BAKER'S ADDITION TO CRAGIN; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND THE
SOUTH LINE OF LOT 16 IN SAID BLOCK 1 IN DICKEY AND BAKER'S ADDITION TO CRAGIN, TO THE WEST LINE OF LOCKWOOD
AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOCKWOOD AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE U
OF LOT 16 IN THE HULBERT, FULLERTON AVENUE HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION NO. 12, A SUBDIVISION IN THE EAST Ki OF THE
SOUTHWEST % OF SECTION 28,;SAID SOUTH LINE OF^Ltri^^lNCfALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF
FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE-EAST ALONG SAID NbRWLlNEfOJTHE^LLEY LYING NORTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE TO THE EAST
LINEOF LOT 30 IN SAID HULBERT FULLERTON AVENUE NO. 12, SAID EAST LINE OF LOT-30;BE!NGALSO
THE WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST-OFiLARAiyilE AVENU^THENaVb LINE OF ANALLEY LYING
WEST OF lARAMIE AVENUE TO THE NORTHTiNE OF DEMING PLACE; THENCE EAST'ALONGTFiE: NORTH LINE OF DEMING PLACE TO THE 'WEST¦LINElpFiLOT 35 IN THE HULBERT'fULLERTON AyENUE;HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION #4 IN TH E WEST JVOFTHE SE Jl OF SECTIpN 28 AFORESAID, BEING ALSO THE EAST LINE OF ANALLEY LYING EAST OF LARAMIE AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG I HE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF LARAMIE AVENUE TOTHE SOUTH LINE Of SAID LOT 36 IN HULBERT FULLERTON AVENUE HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION NO. 2, A SUBDIVISION IN THE WEST V, OF THE SOUTHEAST Jl OF SECTION 28 AFORESAID, :-¦ SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 36 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE EAST -ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 15 IN E.F. KENNEDY'S RESUBDIVISION OF PAUL STENSLAND'S SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST J4 OF THE . SOUTHEAST /. OF SECTIONi28 AFORESAID; THENCEs6u™VALp'NdTsAib'NORTHERLY EXTENSION ANDTHE EAST LINE OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 15 IN E.F. KENNEDY'S RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH LINE OF FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF FULLERTON AVENUE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 10 FEET OF LOT 28 IN SAID BLOCK 15 IN E.F. KENNEDY'S RESUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST 10 FEET OF LOT 28 IN SAID BLOCK 15 IN E.F. KENNEDY'S RESUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 21.IN SAID BLOCK 15 IN E.F. KENNEDY'S RESUBDIVISION, SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 21 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE TO THE EAST LINE OF LAMON AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LAMON AVENUE TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 25 IN BLOCK 1 IN McAULEY AND ELLIOTS SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTH 34 OF THENORTHEAST Jl OF THE NORTHEAST Jl OF SECTION 33 AFORESAID, SAID NORTH LINEOF LOT 25 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OFTHE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE TO THE EAST LINE OF LAVERGNE AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LAVERGNE AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF BELDEN AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF BELDEN AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF LECLAIRE AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LECLAIRE AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 48 IN BLOCK 2 IN CHICAGO HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTH J4 OF THE NORTHWEST Jl OF THE NORTHEAST /. OF SECTION 33 AFORESAID, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 48 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF FULLERTON
Attachment Three, Page 4
60
avenue; jhenge west along said south line of the alley lying south of fullerton avenue to the west line of
lot.l in the resubdivision of lots 29 to 46 in block 8 in foss & noble's subdivision of part of the east /, of east
y,of the nj.orthwes^ said west line of lot-rbeing also the east line of the alley lying
east'^
;THE NOR™Xw^ n'oRTFRINE OF/BEjpEN;AVENyEi"LATROBf AVEN&E;vTH Of LATROBE AVENUE TpTHE-SOUTH LINE.OF PALMER STREET;
:THENCE;WESTiALp STREET TO THE WEST.LlNE OF LOCKWOOD AVENUE; THENCE NORTH
ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOCKWOOD AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN PULASKIS SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 29 TO 46 IN :
"BLOCK l!iNjpiCkEY & OF PART OF THE WESTKr OFTH^ 33 pt (
AFORESAIp/SAlblNORtHllNEO}^T;i'BElNG AisOTHE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE; 5
;THENCE^WEST ALONG SAip SOUTfl'UNE/OFTHE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF FULLERTON^AVENUE TO THE EAST LINE"OF: LONG,
AVENUE; THENCE NO'RTH;ALp^_G*¥Aib'EAST;LINE-6F LONG AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE ^
WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF FULLERTON AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID
WEST LINE 0F CENTRAL^AVENU E TO THE:NORTH LINEOF LOT 43 iN CEPEK'S SUBbiVfSjbW;0^8LpCK 1 IN COMMISSIONER'S „
SUBDIVISION OF THAT PARTO^ THE NORTHEAST % OF S ECTI ON :3 2 AFOR ES Al rX'SAj D NORTH UNEOF LOT 43
BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF
THE ALLEY LYING-SOUTH OF FULLERTON^AVENUETO THE WEST LINE OF PAR'K&6J£aV^ NORTH ALONG SAID WEST
LINE OF PARK^ AVENUEjTHENCE^ESTs^ I
FULLERTON.AvfNyE^TO^ 1 IN BLOCK 1 IN GRAND AVENOfes^BOiyiSION OF:BLOCKS 2, 3 AND 4 IN
COMMISSjbN^l^luBbivisiON OF%AT PAMPf'THE EAST X OF THE NORTHEAST; 54^
SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 1 IN GRAND AVENUE SUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION
THEREOF TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 46 IN SAID BLOCK 1 IN GRAND AVENUE SUBDIVISION, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 46 BEING
iALSbT.Hl-S^^^ OF FULLERTON AVENUE;THENCE WEST ALONGI SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE
AL'LEY-LY(nG^ LINE OR MELVINA,AyENUE;;fHENCENORTH;ALONGTHE WEST LINE
OFMELVINAAvE^^
VWENUE-T.O^ THENCE NORTH ALONG THE. EAST LINEOF MEADE AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE
/)F'SECTION 29.AVbRlSAiD^f LOT 15 ALSO BEING THE NORTH:LlNE OF AN ALLEY LYI NG NORTH;OFU.
; FUaERTPN^AVENU^
LlNEpF:MENARP^ ' -AV^NUE^THENCE^ASTALONG THE'nORTH LINE OF FULLERTON AVENUETpTHE WEST LINE OF-MANGO AVENUE; THENCE . NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF MANGO AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY* EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 245 IN THE SECOND^ADWibN TO FULLERTON CEN^
AFORESAID, SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 245 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF PARKSIDE AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF PARKSIDE AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 51 IN FULLERTON CENTRAL MANOR, A SUBDIVISION IN THE EAST Yi OF THE SOUTHEAST Y. OF SECTION 29 AFORESAID, SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 51 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF FULLERTON AVENUE; THENCE EAST . ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 51 IN FULLERTON CENTRAL MANOR TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF, SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 51 BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING-WEST OF CENTRAL AVENUE; ,* : THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST OF CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 6IN BLOCK 1 IN DIVERSEY HIGH1ANDS, A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTH Y, OF THE NORTH Yx OF THE NORTHEAST Ya OF THE . SOUTHEAST Ya OF SECTION 29 AFORESAID; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE:6jF.LOT 6 IN:>K U BLOCK 1 IN DIVERSEY HIGHLANDS TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 6 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF MERRIMAC AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF MERRIMAC AVENUE TOTHE NORTH LINE OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DIVERSEY AVENUE TO THE WEST LINEOF MELVINA AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF MELVINA AVENUE TO THE SOUTHiLINE OF LOT 44 IN -GILDERSLEVE'S SUBDI VISION OF BLOCKS 6 AND 10 TO 13 IN OLIVER L. WATSON'S 5 ACRE ADDITION TO CHICAGO A SUBDIVISION OFTHE SOUTH Yi OF THE NW Ya OF SECTION 29 AFORESAID; THENCE EAST TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 36 IN GllbERSLEVE'S SUBDIVISION AFORESAID; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 36 IN GILDERSLEVE'S -SUBDIVISION AFORESAID TO I HI. I AS I' LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING EAST OF MELVINA AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING EAST OF MELVINA AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 4 IN ANTHONY P. ROSS' RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 34 (EXCEPT THE NORTH 96 FEET THEREOF) AND ALL OF LOT 35 IN GILDERSLEVE'S SUBDIVISION AFORESAID; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 4 IN ANTHONY P. ROSS' RESUBDIVISION AFORESAID TO THE WEST LINE OF MOODY-AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF MOODY AVENUE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 117 IN COLLINS & GAUNTLETr'S DIVERSEY SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4 TO 6, 8, 9, 12 TO 19, 22 TO 29, 33, 39 TO 43 AND 45 TO 50 IN GILDERSLEVE'S SUBDIVISION AFORESAID, ALSO OF BLOCK 5 IN OLIVER L. WATSON'S 5 ACRE ADDITION TO
Attachment Three, Page 5
61
CHICAGO, A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH A 01" THE NW % OF SECTION 29 AFORESAID; THENCE EAST TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 117 IN COLLINS & GAUNTLETT'S DIVERSEY SUBDIVISION AFORESAID; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF '
LOT 117 IN COLLINS & GAUNTLETT'S DIVERSEY SUBpjVlsYo^ TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT.72 IN COLLINS &
GAUNTLETT'S DIVERSEY SUBDIVISION AFORESAID BEING AL^ LINE OF McVICKER AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF McVICKER AVENUE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 26
IN WALTER E. GOGOLINSKI'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 9 OF OLIVER L. WATSON'S S ACRE ADDITION TO CHICAGO AFORESAID,
SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 26 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVENUE; THENCE EAST
ALtiNGTj^ WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF^|^Yj&|NG;NORTH OF DIVERSEY AVEN^ETO THE EAST LINE OF
L0TT27 IN SUBDIVJSIONhgJ^^ SUBpi^ipN OF THE NE Ya OF
SECTION .29.AFORESAlj^^ CENTRAL AyENIJE;:THENCE NORTH;ALONG
SAID WEST LINE^OFsTHEJALL LINE OF THE N0RT>H^16; FEET 8 INCHES OF LOT
.17ijN BLOCK 1 IN SCHE^ENbI^G'S sM , .
SECTION 29 AFORESAID; THE^ SOUTH OF THE NORTH 16 FEET 8 INCHES OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 1 IN
SCHERENBERG'S SUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WEST LINE OF PARKSIDE AVENUE; THFNCF. NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF PARKSIDE AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 30 IN REGAN'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 11 TO 46 IN BLOCK 2.jN SCHERENBERG'S SUBDIVISION AFORESAID, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 30 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE* OF THE ALLEY.LYING SOUTH OF BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OFiBELMONT AVENUETOTHE WEST LINE OF MARMORA AVENUE; THENCE*N0 RTH'ALONG'SAID WEST LINEXIF MARMORA/* ' AVENUE TO f H||0UTH LfNE.OF, BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUT^^HiLlNEpF BELMONfeAVENUE TOnTHE"
^EASTjLINE.pFMA^ONAyE^ .
THE;n6rTH LlNE^^ OF BLOCKS iA^^^ .:
DYjyiEWieZSUBD'M^ AFORESAID,' SAip;NO.RTHlLINEpF LOT 4p;.BEING ALSO THE SOUTO LINEOFT^
; ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH 01 BELMONT AVENUE TOTHE EAST LINE OF AUSTIN AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF AUSTIN AVENUE TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 3 FEET OF LOT 40 IN BLOCK 1 IN JAVORAS AND JOHNSON'S WESTFIELD MANOR SUBDIVISION
- OF THE EAST K» OF THE NORTHEAST Ya OF THE NORTHWEST Y. OF SECTION 29 AFORESAID; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY
EXTENSION TO THE TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 36 IN BLOCrtjIjN SAipMvORAS AND JOHNSON'S WESTFIELD MANOR
SUBDIVISION, SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 36 BEING!ALSo'tfHE.yv£Si^p6F^HE ALLEY LYING WEST OF AUSTIN AVENUE; THENCE
NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 36 WBLOCKIl^ WESTFIELD MANOR SUBDIVISION TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 36, SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 36 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF • BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINEOJJTHE^EY^LYING SOUTH OF BELMpNTNAyENUETpTHE WEST ' LINE OF MEADE AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF MEADE AVENUfc TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 76 IN CHARLES BOOTH'S BELMONT AVENUE ADDITION TO CHICAGO, A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE'NORTHri ^
OF SECTION 20 AFORESAID, SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 76 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF BELMONT AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF AUSTIN AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF AUSTIN AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 2 IN JOHNSON BROTHERS FIRST ADDITION TO WESTFIELD MANOR, A SUBDIVISION IN THE WEST 1/3 OF THE WEST Y> OF THE SOUTHWEST X OF THE SOUTHEAST Ya OF SECTION 20 AFORESAID; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF. LOT 6 IN BLOCK 2 IN JOHNSON BROTHERS FIRST ADDITION TO WESTFIELD MANOR TO THE EAST LINE Or SAID LOT 6, SAID EAST UNI. OF LOT 6 BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF AUSTIN AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF AUSTIN AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 IN SAID BLOCK 2 IN .; JOHNSON BROTHERS FIRST ADDITION TO WESTFIEID MANOR, SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE ,OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF SCHOOL STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH Or SCHOOL / STREET TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OFTHE WEST LINE OF LOT 16 IN THE SUBDIVISION OF LOT 7 IN OWNER'S PARTITION OF LOTS 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 IN VOSS PARTITION OF THE 80 ACRES WEST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST 40 ACRES OF THE SOUTHEAST Ya OF SECTION 20 AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY. EXTENSION AND THE WEST LINE OF LOT 16 IN THE SUBDIVISION OF LOT 7 IN OWNER'S PARTITION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 16 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF MELROSE STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF MELROSE STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 17!IN SAID SUBDIVISION OF LOT7 IN'OWNER'S PARTITION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 17 IN THE SUBDIVISION OF LOT 7 IN OWNER'S PARTITION TO THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF, SAID SOUTH LINE OF. LOT 17 BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF BELMONT AVENUE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF BELMONT AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF MAJOR AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF N. MAJOR AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF MELROSE STREET,
Attachment Three, Page 6
62
THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF MELROSE STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT: 15 IN THE SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH A Of THE NORTH /, OF THE SOUTH 10 ACRES OF THE EAST 40 ACRES IN THE SOUTHEAST % OF SECTION 20 AFORESAID, SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 15 BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THEIa1lEY,LYING WEST OF CENTRAL AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OF HENDERSON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAiD NORTH^InE OF HENDERSON STREET TO Thil WEST LINE OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCE NORTHALONG SAID WEST LINE OF CENTRAL AVE N U1 TQiTHE SOUTH LINE OF RpSCOESTREET; THENCEWEST ALONG^ipjSp^TH UNE-OF ROSCOE STREET TO THE WEST UNE OF MAJOR AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WE
NEWPORT AVENUErfTHiN^ AV EN U EiTp TH E € AST; LINE OF: LOT 7TN!BRlflGAN:S
RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS^Tol? ANKiotb^8ANp}3i?TO ANt>HANSEN;S ADDITION TO CHICAGO^
SUBDIVISION IN THEiEASTk OF THE;NE X OFj^ WEST LINE OF, AN ALLEY'
LYING WEST OF CENTRaTaVENUE; THENCE NORTH .ALUNG^WEsfjLJNE OF AN ALLEY.LYING WEST OF CENTRAL AVENUETO THE SOUTH LINE OF EDDY STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF EDDY STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF MAJOR/J AVENUE; THENC^.I^pRTHJALONG THE WEST LINE OF MAJOR-AVENUE TO THE SOUTH EAST CORNER 6f LOT 11N H E R M AN; L J MAGNUSON'S RESUBDIVISION OFTHE EAST 60 FEET OF LOT 142 IN KOESTER & ZANDER'S ADDITION TO WEST IRVING PARK, A SUBDIVISION OFTHE SOUTH X OF THE NEX OF SECTION 20 AFORESAID, ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING ™~ NORTH OF ADDISON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG THE. NO RTH LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING NORTH OF ADDISON STREET TO THE: EAST LINE OF LOT 137 IN KOESTER & ZANDER'S ADDITION TO WEST IRVING PARK AFORESAID, BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF AN ALLEY LYING WEST OF CENTRAL AVENUE; THENCEFORTH ALONG THE WEST Ll N E, OFTHE ALLEY, LYI NG WESTOF^lNTRAL AVENUE TO THE NORTH LINE OEBERENiCE AVENUE,"THENCEEAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINEOF BERENICE AVENUE TOTHE i POINT OF BEGINNING AT THe" WEST LINE OF CENTRAL-AVENUE; ALL IN THE CITY OF CHK^GO, COOK COUNW^UNpiS.' ™s J
¦ *" . . ¦ • " ¦ . . " |_ 5
- ''I r . v.; 'i':J;. I
Vis - . *
Attachmont Three, Page 7
63
^ if. .: ¦¦ s imtKM h ¦ ¦ 5
PLAN APPENDIX
Attachment Four - Parcel Listing
|1010|ZZCZ!
Z'ZZI
T"2
ZIZZ ZIZZ
Z19ZZ
ZIEZ
ziez
";i3 J ........
ZIIZI
ZiiEZ
ZIEZ
"":18"
""20
.13^23103^ 13202^
?i?2^403Q«H6o'$" ""'":'$"
7 T ''$'
"$"'
¦?i.;..™?;^^0.?024rj^oaz
^3 zrz^??p^^^^^^9'"z^-
MZZIIEI^
"261320403^
JLZZiI?^2l9lS?5?£Z]L
IfCZZ-ill^ JZIIIp20403033^^
!liZZZ^il9^ip^^^?ZZl"
"32 "'13264636386606 $"
"33 "132046703^
JlZZZIl?^^^ 'IIZIIII?9^9Z9l?9999ZIE J^IZII??9i9Z9^9999Z IlfZZlIi-!^
"38r"p204070360
„......„„^^
JUZZIZ?204070380^ "41132646763900
3^ZZ1^^^E?^§2§IIE. 431326411632660 4413264116336666]'
'"4513264116340660$"
Attachment Four, Page 1
13204110350000 ; "l320iS^
!B2i3i2oiibooor^
46
"47:
48 49 "|6-'Jl
III JI
'"54" '55
2013-EAV
r^;»>63,933
zrzii>iziz
49J9SIS
IIZilE
^76706"
^ZiilllllliiS^ ^ ZZZI!?ZZZ"i52i^
*ii' 59 j;.1321312018bbW~$ jlff^T
ZI"jlZZIIIII0^ ZZiEZIilIII^^^
!-: ^6T^~1321312b33p(ki^~!$ 99t'573"
m0jl78
"6M64
66 ¦.-13,28iP5035.0QQ0->^ 1»B28T6?0370^!7JI
JEZIjfl^ ZIZZZ^
'7!132ilOT^10^
IzIZZj^I^^^^^
!!MZ!IZi^^i9zi?li5]?^ZZj["
¦^™" "13281070^
jIEIJMii^M^EIE,
'76™™[l32m
._„^........._
"78™"'"" 1328113^ Z75ZZZZil281X30340'^
JjELZZIII^M^^^
"8l"132811303^ 8413281156326666 $
"WZZJWiE^i9iE§9^Zlt
8613281156340006"
JZII"i?I?Ii|9^
88i32Ei?6'3ob'bbb$
8913"28Ti'56'37bb'bb $
"90i3"28i2'i'63T $
' IIjEZZIIIIIIi^ 't;.is?"isailiib^bWnr^
146,841
ZIIil9E Z'zmiE
.....„.„„.„.„...
Z'lil?L ~-50|402"
ZlOlii-Z'H-izE
25^074'
"ZjEME ^iSZll
116$§E.
'|&9;304'
ZMjil.,
ZMEEZ
""^86?' "Z54.370™ Jf^234" '"'33,182'"
64
Index Parcel ID No. •¦'¦« No. a ;; (PIN) J
""''91"''
ZlEZZ^^li^iiSMZ
Zi^IZZi?IiIi?iIi92lZ'
Zio^LZil?!^
"!;^IIZ^PlIiI^iIl32l™^ ZiuE.IiP^
Zi°E21IIiiBi9iIi9iIZ'
^iMi'Zi^liiiip^IEiZZ
ZMiIZ^iIliI§lMiZ! ZS^E}§?1hI^I^Z Zi3ZZl?l^i^^8i§II ¦^lsZiP??i0l9llMi"I
I^ZI!P??i?^iilMIII ,...^„.__^__^™..
Zili!!ZI?IIi?l^^Ii92LZ
"' W]ZiPIIIli^ii9?IZ]
"ii8'"'"""i'32
ZHLZIilli^
ZOIZZIOl^^^
Z^Z]IPI?^29l?9999'Z:
I ^^ZZZ^?9^7029^00 ^
Zip™ Z:'^I?il79?9^99Z"
IIPZZZE?^^ "T^
""l28^13291270336^
13013291276356666 .13113291276366666 T^ZZZ^29128031OT ' 133'" Z132912803200^ 13413291286336666 "l35132?1280340006
Att.'ichim.'nt Four, i'li^i; 2
2013EAV
~~T.J^Ml"¦V1 ..
ziziiiziisi
i^.i?...fe;«4'
36,668-J ., i.
...;!:l...lCIII^ •
35,781
36,047 : 35T869"!.'- I
""¦"™"36"688™^^,'
36,135.
36,135 1
—-
35,869 •'
""46310"].'. .¦¦ ¦
ijp3Tt^i
":{36i580}^|r 37,911 l
38^356 LV;ii
36,047 ...¦_^t^.^.
""36AQqZ'> '¦<'.; "123,668 ;. ' ;
27^422""1^,',4
Ziyi!?-1
"l6p0£};;^( ¦ 22p'70"''': .:>
'"223)676 82,988'
Zll'Il?-32'520
''''4l"891 41.734
i'4'3,'563' 69774'™
65
Index No.
J.3(p
"l™3™ J39J
Ji9~Z-"l41J
"142~:
"143;"'
jii.Z
"145""" Tir!
]l50J
"isTl
~152JZ
154~"" '1550 1567'"
IIIZ
15? "
159'"':
16C™] 16l"T
163™'" 164 165"""'
167""h 168 ' 16?" 170™)'
17™'™ 17™ '173'"''' 174-'" ™7™"7
177'
179 180
2013EAV
Parcel ID No;. V (PIN)
•1-329123P350000 $ 75,723^, ^379T2803766o6""r$""367785
¦,,1329i280410000--:'- '$.243,178»:'
.13292240340Q00_
"l329"^f032'6Ni)q6: r-$T. 63^456" '.13292^
!?5i:.92'2.Z?.,
$•
"'$' .......
.;:_44i474
Zl^iIZ
"™7'ZI^55™'
13292240360000
108,805; 3"™^22™'
Zl^^-E
™i|™877v '™3"™™6d'
Z!I£§Zl"
ZH-Z^:" ii4™866"'
'"'6|'225"
ZIf™:™f
Z'45,012"
Zi^Z9Zl Z48j9T
ZIf™l£iZ
ZII'IZC
'"'36™S™'"
i32H2i95Z9.9-9.9... •••£329^246^600''
,13292250^^^ l3292|5li2™p61™gV
13292250^|i0^
"l3™:92™:™|™^^ Ji32922™f™i™i™^
"l3292™3™4^
"I32llil^l?MIiZZ"
lIi^l9339MZ IZZ:
Z|2?|26™350q6™2 '¦' $""" ;1329226™i66c^™"$ 71329^260370^
Zl^22iii^99Z "IZZ
^132922603
;^29i^^dj™§7]TZZ
Zllllll^Ii^ZI!!""" "^li?^i^l^E:ZfZZ
Ilp92™ld3^pl7Z$Z^ Z32i2|70^4^a™J™"""
9^834. '"|™666"
Ziijir
261,401"'
3637736" •~-2"jg"
"p2j2l7P4B)0C«"7iTZ 'l329p8041p^ '
•1329™|™^ 'l329228638"66bb
IIi^2l93l9^Z" TZZ
7132^2280466666'$"
"1329229037
"l329229P38^ [
1329229^$
Index No.
Parcel ID No.
ASiPIN) ...
181 ^is^^^^o.om^
'lE'"''""'l3292290^
183 . •,1329.2230360000'
185 _1322230029£qoq_ 186
189 ^^^§30000^ "191lM9W60350boo"
192 132923.00360000
19313792316166666"
194 13292310170000 19513'2'923ib43''6ob'6''
196 ^.^32:9S9229
198_ 13292310400000
292^13M^M93M929 ¦¦ii^ZIiII^ilil^PPL ''202ZlIIIIIIIIll^PP"
204 ; 13292310340000 •2^"J-^2g23^0330Q0^"
206 _ 13292310480000_; '267-13792316470666"
208132923104600pq_
210 .1.3292.319440000
"211 13293636480060'
214 ;13293030030000; "215i'32"93030640006";
2013EAV
' ;"'69,42"b™'j'
$ ' 71,768. ¦1""T'259,'320'
$ : 125,744 >
$
.......
.......
"$"'
78,214
1_40^26
$
"$"
'™45™546"' 'l69™437"
$
"$"
''130,983
:245,366
-131,476 ~™"ji™""™
131,476
']:131™7|
'™?"™™80~
ZJl9l$Ll 110,384"'
th
$ lip.384 "$'110,384
fr.
_ 1^665 '$'""l39,3™i'3™
r
^.;,,.^:;;69,345j $69,'96'b"
61,355;
>136,845-: ,,„._.„.„...
Index No.
2013 EAV
"e"~~f
1Q0,394 '330,034
Parcel ID No. (PIN)
226. 13293050p_20000 "227132¥3W2:3b"6ro6"'
228 ' 1329305,024'OOOQ $
"229™l379W6b4db6o""T$"
230 1329Jpj029QPgq $ "231132930™^^
232 1329307034000a $ 9M81 "233"B2¥30763500b0$147,765™
234 _!3293^
237;
'238™
J^IZliI11^02^IZ-"236"l3793lib3lbbbo'™T
465,863
¦;132?107033000_q_
"i3794b'6bbibbbb''
378,252 797235"!
239 .is^ooop^pooa:-^
,91,598;,
241 13294P0O050000,- $
"242ri32WdBob^oaoo $"
.243 .13^9jQlpfrjjOOO^ $
63,834,
121v682| "™™U26™ "''l7,'2'93"'
JMZIMMi9i92l922£ZL
2^ZZM^^^9^^2l][.
"247 "13794016050000 '$"
,;i7i4.§Z;. 216I566''
248 13294pi0ppppa0 $ '24913''29^
250 1329402001^
_49,275
"252J^^woMSME^'
253 „ •-13294020040000 '$ . 60,939 "2541329402?^•-V--VV"-
255 ,13294020060000 "256^3294^^
$
76,285 ''51,743™
"25813294b3"!D020bob'$"""97382
259 13^94030030000
49,636 ''99,735"
'260i'3794b3bb4"bbbb"
99,235 88,273
261; 13294030050000. "26213794036060006"'
263 . 13294030070000 264T^k^WmM
26,674
265 13294040430000 $ 146,815 "266'l72946'^46™297'
267 13294040461002 ' 26813294b'4046ib03
16,256
269 13294040461004 '276132946^6T6i005
At.tnchment Four, Page 3
index Parcel ID No. No. (PIN)
273 ... 13294040461008
276-;> f 1329,4040.0.800,00
J78 3ll329^0l0000q>
279 '''¦yWM^E^iW^'
2JriL....'':^
...?.§±......132.?A9^°95.9.9.9.9
•286:;j^l329A0j§Pj3!7j^0J3jp • 287i'32'94060'6'80^^
...28§l„33??.4960.°^99;. __....„^™^g™
290 132812704300PQ?
"l2^"'^l^^Q3^o6o<^
292 l^]^?0340000n 2§313'28'm
2947.....„l328i2Z.936.9.9.9.9
'295^"':;"328i27b3TObbb''
296^ •.•13281270400000* "297"7132^300200000"
298„.;„i328i3£q2ioqqq
''29'^
300 i^sisoq^TOoq.
"'.^EEiEf^^iE^t.
JoT"' 1328i3p044™ii^ 304'13T8i*3bp8*&0™b7
"305i'328'i"366'2'9bbbb''
30613281300300000
"307"r3'2"8i3bo3"ibbbb"
308 13281300320qop
369"i328i36b45bb'6a'
310 13281300370000;; 111''i3'2"8T3*6o38666o''
31213281300460000 313l'328i3'6647666'6"
314 13281300410000 "315i'3'281366'426666"
$
.......
$
.......
$
.......
.......
"$"'
$
"$"
$
.......
¦j:
2013 EAV
26.556 ™:76™916 ""'"11,758
'i t\:
11,758 "'."'9,565
12,368 '"67b,565
i1.15,737i
"l66™i25
106,125 '¦106,125
...62'.?.3.2 '"66,18*1
^ 128,303;
^i^sbs'
::56J6i65; ".73,157"
68,992
_342,7J0l
"E§IEiMi....
: 13,369
ft
:ibl96ir'S^ EEEE>1
104,325 ,„_.
95,006 8"734: 13l66"
Index No.
2013 EAV
:-:;";"Y5g"39"3";
Parcel ID No. (PIN)
.....,._„.„_
316. 132813004.3P00q. "3171328T3lbHbo"6b™
.47,460;;-''47V46b7
$v
318 1328_13102?P£90 Tl9 '' 13^i3^237)b7jb"
^53J)85;;; '™53"*985™
"32b"r328lHb24obb"a"
...i3.2li.3192.5.9.9.9.P li378i"3Tb2¥pb'6b~:
¦ 13281310430000 $;.;106,867^-
93}5^ip
'i3]ibp!
'i328mo29bo"w$ri53^8oT;!
i.32?.i.3i.939.9.0.90 ^28li3lb3ib~ibT
173,734
132,413. „_„„..
„1328131034000q. '"l328"l3ib'35bbb'6'''
...i.32?ili9fi9.99° 'T328E164T6600'
^3.28232q36qqqo-.
'"l32^
.$
$ : .144,919 '$199^60"
$
J328131O38O09O'.
...i32?.i3i.9.i9.9.9.9.9... "i3T8T3ib4ibbo"b"
123,04a '"205,064"
87,501.
$ ¦
291,165 T6"6,966'
,1„.1„„185,413.
"$' "'136,'6'9'i"
,13281315200000
;131,699. 793,730."
339 i328mo42qqqo^ '34 b"W2^u9^3Tomi"
163,597
13281290360090 ^i3i8T2T63T6W6"
;;343- 13282240210000 'M4T"73m8^86Jio6o6"
345- ' ••13282280220000 $ .....35,063V
.liCl..!^ ;347;'™
80,885,
"348: 132822^
.349 13282280460000
$
351.! 13282290280000 '3527'""^
.35.3:.;.i3.2§22903009.00
"35413282290316666'
58,329
35513282290320000 ''356-13282296330066'
359 "360
357 13282290340000 $ 58,329 "358" "13282296350^ $91-578'"
$ 224,255
1328225)0360000 "i378229U4l661)b''
Attachment Four, Page 4
Parcel ID No.
.:.2.lM!^hz.-
¦•¦£32g229^3"9"Q0"QQ"'
Index No.
362 iM3282290400000
''l^Ejlllill2^
i" '$"
$
T .......
91,669 "92,098
19L....B3.93M9M29991.
372'-' -132823004,60000
.$ "$"'
"$"' .......
":373132¥2¥063lW6'6;"'
J741328230032000q_
"375i37823obW6oob"
376 13282300340000--
"377" ""IHsilidoasoQo^
380 "381"
378 13282300360000 '379'"'" "B
138,626
.i3.28239.9.3.8„9.9.9.9 L
112,813
3_82 "383"
EMME3M§§§9E.E:
384
"385.
^54,212
7~6™56i
•13282300410000 _$ 14,799 '''i'3"2"873W
386-"387"
34,732
.}3182?191I.9.929... "i378"23ibi¥bbob"
388
...i32..823i'.9.i.9.9.9.9.9.
84,942 "96",'475
"l3"2823lb2bbobb"
39 a;
13282310210000 "i'3"28737b'22"bbbo"
392 "'393'
1328231023000q_^ •^32823i54iogoo'":$r"~~4l~32i
394 "395"'
1328231039$198,?15 "13283000560006'"$53,893'
80,969 ... .„.„
396 "397"
31,304 ''51,991
13283000 5.70000 'l'3'2830bb230bb'd''
398 "399""
1328301047^
"'i'3"28'36i'64"8'6666''
400 "4'6'i"'
54,990
13283010030000 $ 114,345 "i32830r60406b0$43',62'8
402 "463''
13283010050000
"i3283"brbb'6obob"
404 "465
13283010070000 $ 43,398
132830^ \64,37b'
'i37837)'ibb9obbb$"b7'i7™'
Attachment Four. I'age 5
2013 EAV ..........................
Parcel ID No. (PIN)
66,427
l?3.8.i91919.9.9.9.9L ¦i3283bi6m
133M919.M9.9.9.9.:. "ij2W6ioi4ooo6"
;$;^; .56,145; '?'""96™78™™
133^.9191^.9.9.9.9...
'T3T8T616160660"
3_44,806:: "206,731"
JiFEiE. '143,695""
.1^^9.^.999°. '132836164^
71,818 '34,333"
I32829i9229.99.9. "JE3E°l9^999l I^3283929ll9?9E
:™1328^^^
34,333 ''70,024'
$: ......
......
......
13283020070000; "137830200800^
.543,931
"™b7'™64
i32l3l?£43.9.9.9.9... "i3783b2047b6bb'"
;dL33;294 "iTi"™"™
'i"53™85l"
.1?2$3.92.9129S>9.9 "13787626260000"
...l32819.29.2i.9-9.9.9...
'4378302027bbbb*'
149,083
i3"28303bbrbb"6b"'
48,267 1~~™389~
$
.......
......
132819.3£9299.99. 139'3.i.0:. "i37^3W6b'3bbobrT~To7,53f*
139>055-
'731,666™ '137,606™
13283030040000 '13783030050000'":
I32819.?9.9.§.9.9.9.9... "i3j8T63r'o67li66o
132830300_800q0 'l3'2'83"6'3"6'69'6'6'6"67
13„28.3£3.9I9.9.9.9.9 "13783036110000":
132819.3.9.L2.9.9.9.9
144,949; 'l4™l,'949"
' 13783030i3'o6od;
13283030140000 "'l"2830'3'6357bo'b
; 57,732
255,311
.i^s^osoieoooO; '''i'3783^
13283030180000
35346 Ill-Ill."
'li™™789"
"i3W63br9db~6™
1328.3.93.9?.9999.9. 'r378"3"b3b2Tb6b'6'''
33,151
13283030220000 i3'283'0304'6^^
"T378"3'b'36S'T6'6'r'
2013EAV
I'zzzzziizir
"$'; 'ibi'648'
Index No.
ZIEl ZS?!!
ZlUZi
'"458 "
Index Parcel ID No. No. (PIN)
."™CCCZ5M^ii9i^i9£
''4'9"7i'':'"
;l3-95.2.ii '17,405"''
y| 49813283150010000'
l9lZZ'i32^Ii9ili^ ¦ll2Z".ZI3283ll9l3^
$
506 13283150131007 $
-29,009
459k 13283030411010^-- $:. ¦ :v33,148 jfe^i.504;: 13283150131005. $ : '26,107; '760''F''^
¦¦.2,?,009_ ZZ29Z?IZ
MiE§E.
'Z^ImzE 'IM'ilL
1^409™
;il2|l907,
'¦'. -"'
461 "13283030411012 16,092
508;13283150131009 'j99ZZZi32^
!1l9ZZZh^^^
''511;"''^
''513'™
ZilZZZi3283150120^^ ¦|jLZ!Zi3283210^ 1516137830303^600'"
462..., 13283030411013"--I""0--- .33,148 '507. 132831-50131008-¦ $, ' 22,009
$
"'$" .......
"$"" ......
"'$""
T
463 13283030380000_ $. JL?3n,13£. "'^TJ'l3
SSH^^^^^^ZZSZIi^^
,_...'f
ZiiiZZ: 7i32jB30703"^
Z4i£ZZ!i32839Z93
&|517;; .1328412.0^ $ ;ZjZ?j*21. I#"''518i'3'2'8^'$"""'33S970''
Z#z?ZZZZi??§IZ^Z9
"ifEZI:!^
519 13284120070000.$
35,970
"47j'ZZ"i3283^ ZZ^lill '474'"!i328307b44i603 38,276
_ 14,672 f'
l3„2.8i.l2„9.9.5„9.9.9.° L
\i 61,09,%$;
Z^lllZ:
i'3',1'66'''
475 13283070430000 $ - « •?» r.520.13284120060000 $
"!M 522:
^.....^^MPZ?43^!.^...!.
^mMi^oosqoqo ;.$;
132^412002^066'$"
523; J24Z
'477'""l3283.6704¥i6^
.478. 13283070431003 ' $ .• 21,672 I;
I32l4i29.919.9.9.° A.
73'28408^
.„
526,
90,908. "ibb'24'7"
.4.8£;l..-f32839Z943I995.:;::.^ .....2.i>6„7.2...
527
13284080380000 $ .;¦
I328l6m640666'$'
l&ZZillli^^
52,845
528
" ZZI2E 'ZZI3?Z 531
'•T!ZI32Z' 533"
; ZI34Z
5357
536"
¦":'"ZI3zZ
,-.<538'
ZZ$3IZ
546"
"^^EEEMi^^M^EE^EEE^l^i
13284080030000 $ 132^
'"4837""^
.179,481?
13284080410000 $
"i328T68obibb"bb"'^
484 - 132830704310q9;7$^---'21,672
141,879.
13284040360000 $ '1328464635
21,672 '21,369'
486 13283070431011 $ 21,672 '487™B'28367043l6'i2;"" '21,672'
$
Wl,108« 73,67"2"'' 'Tib',564"'
13284040030000 $
'"i3784o'4762bdbb"'"'$"
488 13283070431013 "489i'32'8'3'67643'161'4'
490v--;vvl3283ll0310000 $ 135,059
13284040010000 $
'''^3284666226666$
'491'i3283ii6326'6'66" $"""72,85b
122,142 '"''42,846' "'"47846"'
.i3^.819.9.9.2i.9.9.9.u L '13184666206666'$"
492 _13283110330000 $ ,76,762.; ''493'"i'3283'il63'4bobb$69,497
494 13283110420000 $ .83,213 '495'13283110430000$63'43'i'''
Attachment Four, Page (>
69
Index No.
2013 EAV, 734™68b":
Parcel ID Nb.igs5-.; (PIN)
$ 96,600 ; -:
"$""79,82'bi *r
34,0803 ...„.„_„™g.^
175"§6F: 17573667i
L™.;£.;74^°Z6J; j
'¦"$ "'1777736']
T'^Tl7.55"9V ;] 1—q^5Ty . |"
I'""86''233''M''
•586 ; 13284020050000 $
588 13284020070000,:^ $ "589"l32^2lp^b73p
''590''"'i'328¥6'276'976bo''7'$''"
fig
59l^.>^•13284020100^000^^y^^l75^366tf 592"''"'"' 13284b75l 1^^ '^5^66.t}
593 ¦ 13284j020120jpp $f;-; ;v f36,388 _ '594''1328*5201300^^ '787345"
!>?.5'7i7^ $ 112122
;|
B
598. _'
12EII}3^^Ei20^$84,02l7
""5'9'7''r:" i™ -jj:~"q{Jq2 '
64,467
p13284020170000 $
71,583Sfc 14l725i| 'i'37,373"
600;.
3pi: "g02"
"603"'
"i32^^p^o^orT_
7:T
7i328402p796o"oO$"
13284020420000-$
$
:,...Zi^Z6iii
81,953''
"r3'287b'3"bb76bbb77$
.604 11328403p40pj0£0_
G29^.\.A3?2^93.9.}29.900- 298\r4Z
..199,658 P:-: Zi9M8f)
Z'Z7Zi82IP' ZIpI'iI?!'
'"6b87""i329lS
610 :.1329319p340O0a^ 92,276 bli'r3793li'835bo'6'6W$'97,276'
,612 • •13293190$6.0.0.00.-:^$',: .;' 29,073;
::6i3''''132935^
614 1329.3^90380000 $ 29,973
^l|ZII32IE99399^ "*61677^i32j932
^^...^—^^^^^.^
38,752
^iEr"."i3i93266'^ r 3Ezi.2!
$
13293200441005
'i'379'376'6'44"i'6'b'6'"
622, 13293200441007 $ 24,671 '"623""'i'379"320M^
624 13293299441009 .$; 18,492. 62513293266336006$li'i,373
65,727 111,531
628 '629' "630
626 13292200340000 $ 54,636 '62713293266356060$'73"'453''
13293200360000 'l329326'63'7"6'6'6'6"'
"T329376b'38b"bbb"
70
Parcel ID No. ] v ? (PIN) 'l3™™p00390™5o] ]'™3'™9pq04^0™|F
E^si°"ZE9§M. E^ZEiEZE§§Z EEEEEEEEEEE
2^329«5™370™™™|
ll3!!!2!?3?^!?!!
EEEEEEEEEEE. 11329I1^?322?M-] ii3lM2l93329ME
H3™™4260™5™OP™]] ]™™2942603600™|]] ^l™™!™™™™™"™^™]]
332IIIl9l?P)^?Z 71329^
]l™2™42™"|™|Q™'5'"]
"MMiiEi3l?99P]I
IEEEEEEEEEEZ. IjlIII2Z9l^i99']] ii32942Z94!9^9Z
7™3"9«8031™™™™]]'
]i32?i289329^SI
Z^ZE^M^EZ,
]l329428™340^0]]]
EE§sE3§2929.Z.
1329'^
EEEEEEiEEEE.
LEEEiEiEpEZ. IMEip^EEME.
]i33210400™(™0™^
EEEEEEEEEEI.
''i'33'^
EEEEEEEEEE1. EEEEEEEEEEZ.
1332104Q560TO iEE^EEEP'EE.
EEZEEZE°"EI.
133'^
13321<^^
'i332i656o™6b6'6
'l'3321056™5™6™b'
13321656666666
13321656676666
Parcel ID No. (PIN)
j;1332j£50
]l3321™™6™0™'^ ]™33™™"™6™l6™^'$"
E§E}§i9E§9§EEL .EMEEE9EE229"~"i.
EMEZ^E^FEE^M. EEE^EiE^^ EE.
EEEE9^E929$ "7
E^EZEiME^p'EEZ E^^^MEMiFEEE. J^PPM§M9E§m°-WW:-EMEEEtFE^EEEE
]p32'i™7o466™qb'$""7
EM^M^E^EZEZ '^^^636666'$™
EEEl999EZE^E^E
^MEFEiMMZSEZ
]™™32]™'™6™™6™(™™^ ]l33™2™666^
]]i|™22~6'6]6'^
EEEEEEEEEEZ
"1332261050'^ ]$]]]]
EEMEMEi^FTEZ EEEEEEEE EE
Il3322010501^ ']™3322qib]5]6l006$ 11332201050^ $]]]-"
]Ii^22™™6]5qiqo8"]$]]]]'
]l3322™l6™6l™^ 'JEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEE
[l33229J^^ '''123^616^6666^"'$:
] 133220ip4
]l3™22™iq6™6^$'"]]" ]l3322™lb'6'™6]6TO
13322616696666 $™™
]i3322™ioi™6b(™'™]]]'
i'3322"6'2]66i666b$ ''i"3"'32T6"2"oo26"o66"'$
13322626636666 $
]l3322026q4™0™b
i33™2™266™66™6$'
Parcel ID No.
¦:;:,; t,::i!|l»iN| : _
EMMMEiMZEi!
EEZEZ9Z1992Z EEEEEiEEEEE
7i332|b|^3^oa'
:sE33M?M^9E".
EMZEEEEEl ZEEEEEEEEEE1.
EEEEZZEZE1
"'i'3'3^
~^^§^E^^^!
WEEEEEEEEE. .EIEMEEZZE. EEE2EEE2E. ZEEEEEEEEEl. EEM2EE99E! EZZZZ9E9Z992E. EZEZ9Z99I992E. "EiE^EZEZZE.
ll3322S40||™™007 '"1328330039^
iEEEEEEEEEZ.
"1328330037^^ EEEEEZEZE.
LEEEEEEEEEE. JEZM99E992E.
'132^ 7328323031™)^
"lslhEZZZZZZZEl 132^
Zl&EEEEEE.
ZEEEEEEEEE.
'7l3283^033^ 13283236326666
7l32]832303^
'l'3283236'3''6w 13284266616666 13284266426666
'l328'426643'6666"''
13284266456666
91,299
--------
-------
"86,285"
Parcel ID No. (PIN)
;i32842^ 'l328426o^ "'i'32^ '"132^
ZEEEEEEEEE. ZEEEEEEEEE.
EEEEEEEEEE ''l32842406'70^
ZEEEEEEEEEt
132M2400976"6a"
TOTAL: $ 60,4817662
STATE OF.ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OFCOOK )
^ CERTIFICATE OF INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION ,:a
I,, DAVID D. ORR, do hereby certify that t arn the duIy-quali^Iea'ianl|:4cdng^C!crk of the County of
Cook in the State of Illinois. As such Clerk and-Rursuantito the Real Property Tax
Increment Allpcat|on /Redevelopment Act (Iliinois^Revised-Sta^ further:
CERTlF^HATjon May 9,2002 the\Off|ce oifthe Cook Cbun^^e^fereceived certified copijes-of the following Ordinances adopted by the City of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois on May 17,2000:
1. An Ordinance Approving and Adopting A Tax Increment
Redevelopment Plan and Project for the Belmont/Central
• Redevelopment Project Area; . r '
*2;i , An Ordinance Designating the Belmont/Central Redevelopment ; Project Area as a Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to the ,.: Tax[Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act; and ¦' ¦
Si I A An Ordinance Adopting Tax Increment Allocation Financing for the Belmont/Central Redevelopment Project Area. .
CERTIFY THAT the area constituting the Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area subject to
Tax, Increment Financing in the Ci^iOf^GhlcagO; Cook County, Illiribis/is legally described tjn ' said,
Ordinances. t ¦ I ;:i[*u~f 11"! H * g ; ?'i
CERTIFY THAT the initial equalized assessed value of each lot/block, and parcel ofreal/property within the said City of Chicago Project Area as of May 17,2000 as set forth in the document attached^
f'i f y - y' ' ' ., .
CERTIFY THAT the total initial equalized assessed value of all taxable real property situated within the said City of Chicago Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area is:
TAX CODE AREA 71077 $46,146; 076
TAX CODE AREA 71078 ~ > $27,954,236 ?
TAX CODE AREA 71079 . $70,057
TAX CODE AREA 71080 $804,576
for a total of :
SEVENTY-FOUR MILLION, NINE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND, NINE HUNDRED FORTY -FIVE -DOLLARS AND NO CENTS
($74,974,945)
such total initial equalized assessed value as of May 17, 2000, having been computed and ascertained from the official records on file in my office and as set forth in document attached.
(SEAL)
County Clerk
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature and the corporate seal of COOK COUNTY this 2nd day of April 2015.
U.\TIFS\2001\TlF2001-24.doc
CLRTM369
DATE 04/02/2015
PAGE NO.
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OP CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL REAL, ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL :WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
13-20-215-035-0000
13-20-215-036-0000
13-20-215-037-0000-
13-20-215-038-000;0
13-20-215-039-0000
13-20-215-040-0000
13-20-21b-041-0000
¦ ¦ ¦ *iv#ty; .
13-20-215-042-0000 13-20-219-027-0000 13-20-219-028-0000 13-20-219-037-1001 13-20-219-037-1002 13-20-219-037-1003 13-20-219-037-I004 13-20-219-037-1005 13-20-219-037-1006 '13-20-219-037-1007 13-20-219-037-1008 13-20-219-037-1009 13-20-219-037-1010 13-20-219-037-1011 13-20-219-037-1012 13-20-219-037-1013 13-20--219-037-1014 13-20-219-037-1015 13-20-219-037-1016 13-20-219-037-1017
117,427 153,937 60,745 ;64,165 60,187 45,487 43,214 52,661 163,013 90,666 13,698 11,056 10,408 18,198 11,198 10,408 5,219 •V 7,293 7, 771 9,208 11,056 -7,771 7, 771 11,056 11,708 14,308 18,198
74
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04/02/20.15
PAGE NO. K,
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF: CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRALi
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER OF EACH LOT; BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL REAL-ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA: "
13-20-219-037-1018
13-20-219.-037-1019
13-20-219-037-10 2 0
13-20-2i;9-037-1021
13-20-;219"-037-1022
13-20-219-03 7-1023-
13-20-219-037-1024
13-20-223-026-0000
13-20-223-028-0000
13-20-223-029-0000
13-20-223-032-0000
13-20-223-033-0000
13-20-227-026-0000
13-20-227-027-0000
13-20-227-028-0000
13-20-227-029-0000
13-20-227-030-0000
13-20-227-031-0000
13-20-231-023-0000
13-20-231-024-0000
13-20-231-025-0000
13-20-231-026-0000
13-20-231-027-0000
13-20-331-015-0000
13-20-331-019-0000
13-20-331-020-0000
13-20-331-021-0000
1998 EQUALI-ZEDj: ASSESSED^VALUATION' OF .EACH LOTu.fBLOCK, TRACT-OR PARCEL WITHIN SUCH "PROJECT AREA: .
: 8, 556 v 10,408 - <18,198
m>1981
10,408 .5 ¦ 15, 556 ¦'• Jt3,'698;; 227,405 57,353 : ^6,^:3:3, . 83,941 ; ¦ % 163,952 m 182,523 •% 62,445 : 17,2 08 114,706 : 197, 841 105, 592: 44,747 37,614 0 0
1,205,576 223,658 107,264 76,148 165,720
75
CLRTM3 69
DATE" 04/02/2015
.PAGE NO.
AGENCY::;• 03-0210-526 TIF CI^-OF^HI^^ ,
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER :¦ OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH . PROJECT AREA-:" '"
" 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION &OFl?EACH; LOT, BLOCK, TRACTaOR: PARCEL : WITHIN SUCH PROJECTiiAREA:m.
13-20-331-030-0000 13-20-415-001-0000 13-20-425.-007-0000 13-20 V42;5^ 08;-:Q 000 13-20-425-017-0000 13-20-425-047-0000 13-20-425-048-0000 13-20-430-^3^000.0 13-20-430-014-0000 13-20-4 3 0-02.3-0000 13-20-43 0-030-0000 13-20-430-031-0000 13-20-430-032-0000 13-20-430-033-0000 13-20-431-004-0000 13-21-124-041-0000 13-21-124-042-0000: 13-21-300-001-0000 13-21-300-002-0000 1)3-21-300-003-0000 13-21-300-004-0000 13-21-300-005-0000 13-21-300-006-0000 13-21-300-0.07-0000 13-21-300-008-0000 13-21-300-009-0000 13-21-300-010-0000|10 10|. 0: 0
¦ o
o
-or
Or 0
>0-10-
, . 0 0 '
¦4 0|10 10|1,459^074 3 2 0 , 94-5 64,776 48,241 48,243 48,239 24,635 20,794 20,794 112,786 117,154 58,199
76
CLRTM3 69 PAGE NG 4
PATE 04/02/2015 AGENCY: 03-0210 -526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO- BEI.MONT/CENTRAL • !>
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER 1998; EQUALIZED (ASSESSED VALUATION .
OF EACH LOT, BLOCK,-TRACT OR PARCEL- OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL ::ESTATE:4P^0PERTY WITHIN SUCH ; -WITrMN^UlCH:'PROJECT AREA".:*;]'
PROJECT AREA: ' ... ^ #«tT =
13-21-304-004-0000 104,571
|3^-2i;-:3:0v4-005-0000. - - -,,87,545
13-21-304-006-0000 - 94,390
13-21-304-007-0000. lEJ^ ¦ 93,230
13-21-304-037-1001 J-a ' »n . 30,555
13-21-304-037-1002 ni?17,171
13-21-304-037-1003 18,312
13-21-304-037-1004 r^S ., 19,110
13-21-304-037-1005 ~ v-^- ™>-. 1« 18,686
r¥3&2 $-304-037-1006 .:- : :23 , 797
13-21-304-037-1007 'n^ I- .a i-.4-f.958
'13-21-304-037-1008 r"":" « v r 23,091
13-21-304-037-1009 ?S H r y20?,341
13-21-304-037-1010 ¦">¦ -•¦-"¦» ": ¦ 19,211
13-21-304-037-1011 25,671
13-21-304-037-1012 18,036
13-21-304-037-1024 s :r ^r. 1,067
13-21-304-037-1025 1,067
13-21-304-037-1026 1,067
13-21-304-037-1027 ' ; .1,067
13-21-304-037-1028 ¦ ' ¦ ': * ... .1,067
13-21-304-037-1029 - 1,067
13-21-304-037-1030 854
13-21-304 037-1031. 1,067
13-21-304-037-1032 -1,067
13-21-304-037-1033 1,068
13-21-308-001-0000 27,717
77
CLRTM369 *, PAGE NO. b
DA'J'K 04/02/2015 AGENCY: 03-.0210-526 TTF CITY OF. CH l.CAGO-BELMONT./CENTRAL , . :
5 . PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER "1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL ¦ OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL ESTATE PROPERTYiWITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA':."" ' ¦ 1 p^;-.^. ¦
13-21^3.0B4b'0^6.0aoi , . m-y-i,,^*,. 28,877
13-21-308-004-0000 rv: ' 0
13^-21-308^005-0000. ,;¦::q . • .¦¦ 0-
13-21-308-006-0000 ztW.-->- l'" ¦ t -*0."
13-21-308-007-0000 . ! ' . 70,753 ,¦
13-21-308-008-0000 , ;~ 69,593'
13-21-312-004-0000 '"' s:- 41i/3;#
13-21-3127b3o¥-boi6cr^"' . ^-73,656'
13-21-312-006-0000 . 372, 153
13-21-312-007-0000 o vo^S^ 303.-.
13-21-312-008-0000 ¦ ¦ . 22,041t
13-21-312-038-0000 \ y% ... 58,360
13-21-312-039-0000 82,241
13-21.-315-020-0000 93,516
13-21-315-040-0000 „Vvp„:. 223:, 627
13:-2i^;32f-S21-.0000 ,;: 436,259
13-21-329-022-0000 152,517
13-21-329-023-0000 141,467
13-21-329-026-0000 104,548
13-21-329-027-0000 85;, 138
13-21-329-028-0000 i 18,592
13-21-329-029-0000 18,592
1-3-21-329-030-0000 483,630
13-21-329-031-0000 19,56-7
13-21-329-032-0000 22,895
13-21-329-033-0000 29,743
13-21-329-034-0000 96,447
78
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04/0-2/2 015'-
PAGE NO.
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OR-CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER-"
OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL-
REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH ^
PROJECT "AREA:- ' " "
13X2-1-330-010-0000
13-21-336-019-0000
13-21-330-020-0000
13-21-330-021-0000
1.3-21-330-022-0000
13-21-330-025-0000
13-21-33 0;- 026-0000
13-21-330-027-0000
13-21-330-028-0000
13-21-330-029 -.00 00
13-21-330-030-0000
13-21-330-031-0000
13-21-330-032-0000
13-21-330-033-0000
13-21-330-034-0000
13-21-330-035-0000
13-21-330-036-0000
13-21-330-037-0000
13-21-330-038-0000
.13-21-417-025-0000
13-21-417-026-0000
13-21-417-027-0000
13-21-417-028-0000
13-2.1-417-032-0000
13-21-417-033-0000
13-21-417-041-0000
13-21-417-042-0000
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION "0E4EAGH. LOT, . BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
" f.W f, ^ I 25,208
% ;-' ;i 38, 233
143,052
'¦ 23,035
: . t ¦¦: ¦ 26, 514
¦:; ' 125, 573
98,906
105,772
120,503
'J i-4.J i 80,037
iMr^i g i ; 99,249
-"Ph 32, 583
i* 28, 788
117,307 122,316
-i;.;' ; 52,895
¦vr? 71,431.
" ¦ 71,852 217,678 55,317 16,077 95,680 95,680 72,174 88,327 0
311,394
79
CLRTM3 69 . PAGE MO. 7
DATE 04/02/2015 AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF. CITY OF CHICAGO- BELMONT/CF.NTRAL ¦
^1 ;s:^ERMANENT5REA^;|e1STATE INDEX NUMBER 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
lite 1 lfo'F EACH.iLOTSbLOCK; TRACT OR PARCEL OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL ESTATE"PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH . WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
PROJECT AREA: ' ' M...,.^ -Jr
13-21-417 046-0000 . y ^,331.
13-21-417-047-0000 . ?n„.^K#7 ;-54; 4;
13-21-417-048-0000 --hW$ MZi Zf1 0
13-28-104-001- 0000 ^5,. 272, 688
13:^28^104r00.2-0000 002
13-28-104-007.-00-00 80J53.4:
1/3^28S;104-008-0000 , :Sta 82,784
" "l5l^2.^0^7bt)9-0000, '" .. ^'7^-^1^03,460 ~"¦
13-28-104-010-0000 ' i49:y\2:3;0
13-28-104-011-00.00' f,; . ... 3%113 , 5 6 6>-
13-28-104-012-0000 I?75:v6i5
13-28-104-013-0000 ;v . ii: |^ 44, 471.
13-28-104-017.-0.000 ... ¦ ,i#l;2:4;, 117
13-28T104-018-0000 ::--i-J|>;; ' , . .18, 913
13-28-.10 4-019-0000 .; ifc^ ¦>¦ ¦ ¦/.,; 22, 638
13-28-104-040-0000 :;¥: ¦.'. 172, 049
13-28-104-041-0000 -.Mi 110,707
13-28.-104-042-0000 59,968
13-28-105-0.02-0000 .90, 575
13- 28-105 003-0000 „.vk . 67,097
13-28-105-004-0000 V: 248,670
13-28-105-005 0000 - 75,688
13-28-105-009-0000 85,003
13-28-105-010-0000 115,652
13-28-105-011-0000 - 91,979
13-28-105-012-0000 171,100
13-28-105-013-0000 69,404
80
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04/0272 015
PAGE NO.
AGENCY: 03- 0210-526 TIF-CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRA!,
'PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, . TRACT OR^ PARCEL REAL ESTATE' PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH PROJECT'AREA:
13-28-105-014-0000
13-28-105-015-0000
13-28-105-016-0000
13-28-105-019-0000
13-28-105-038-0000
13-28-105-039-0000
13-28-124-009-0000
13-28-124-017-0000
13-28-124-047-0000
13-28-124-048-0000
13-28-124-049-0000
13-28-124-050-0000
13-28-124-053-0000 -
13-28-124-054-0000
13-28-200-001-0000
13-28-200-002-0000
13-28-200-041-0000
13-28-200-042-0000
13-28-200-043-0000
13-28-200-044-0.000
13-28-300-019-0000
13-28-300-058-0000
13-28-300-059-0000
13-28-304-001-0000
13-28-304-002-0000
13-28-304-003-0000
13-28-304-004-0000
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION JOFSEACH: LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
86,357
- 56,058
; 56,871
511,771
¦; 56,132
ii? 39,561
:r. ' 100,707
; 95,179
¦ ^ s:. 79,296
IL '104,707
O hi ^B150,;019
i ;j •-; -^:-47-;-97.7
1 T" '¦ :: 278,803
r ¦ 377,128
* , ¦ 186,767
. -.^,.,;.112, 640
. , f; .: 120, 668
122,973 r 64,545 631,260 147,012 332,280 596,756 48>795 48,527 48,527 48,527
81
(2L'RTM36y-' '• PAGE NOj^j 9
DATE b.:4/-b2/2 015 AGENCY : : 03-.02T0-526vTI;Fi''CITY OF CHICAGO^BELMONT/CENTRA ± >: n y
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE: INDEX NUMBER 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
" OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
-REAL" ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH " |W' WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
PROJECT AREA: ' ^
13-28-304-005-0000 (*.¦ ? m. ' 48,527
13-28-308-024-0000 M^:, i5fe6,02"
13-28-308-025-0000 - v 134,395
13-28-308-050-0000 ^ «i \2;&6?p2&JIi
13-28-312-00.1-0000 ¦ fv.:.^ . ' ¦ ;7",;697.
13-28-312-022-0000 LyJj- ' 130;,18;8
13-28-316-001-000:0 ¦ :. ^62,132
13-28-316-002-0000 k 18,387
13-28.-316-615-0000 •'v^-i-V%.:. • 16,-41'X?
13-28-316-016-0000 ; 16,192
13-28-316-017-0000 lwT-"M^«::p 16,192
13-28-316-018-0000 '%m^ ; 45,039
13-28-316-019-0000 4b,039
13-28-316-020-0000 , 45,957
13-28-316-021-0000 . :' 45,327
13-28-316-051-0000 ' 49,468
13-28-316-052-0000 90,758
13-28-324-004-0000 48,140
13-28-324-006-0000 - 5,258
13-28-324-007-0000 25,932
13^28-324-013-0000 5,258
13-28-324-035-0000 * 253,640
13-28-324-036-0000 : 47,768
13-28-324-037-0000 47,768
13-28-324-045-0000 111,829
13-28-324-046-0000 89,751
13-28-324-048-0000 11,233
82
CLRTM369 PACK NO 10
DATE 04/02/2015 AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CfllCAGO BELMONT/CENTRAL h •*¦*"¦
:, /' ¦ PERMANENT READ ESTATE INDEX NUMBER1 :" 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED .VALUATION
V; OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACTOR PARCEL OK EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
PROJECT AREA: ' "7
13-28-324-049-0000 : ; 55,274
13-28-325-q3/-.0p00 110,623
13-28-325-032-0000 - 80,076
13-28-325-033-0000 ^ 13,066
i3i-28^325VP34-pOOb - 54,997
f3:-28-3:25Hp.35^ff0lD0' ¦' ¦ 76,761
13-28-325-036-0000 ' i: i • 7*4,550
13-28-325-037-0000 7,021
13-28-325-038-0000 49,968
13-28-325-039-0000 ^l/lli:
1-3-28-326-030-0000 ' ' 142,688
13-28-326-031.-0000 67,261"
13-28-326-032-0000 - 65,816
13-28-326-033-0000 f 65,737
13-28-326-034-0000 ¦ ¦¦¦¦ 29,786
13-28-326-037-0000 59,758
13-28-326-038-0000 1 79,765
13-28-327-031-0000 122,831
13-28-327-032-0000 57,710
13-28-327-033-0000 74,095
13-28-327-034-0000 39,190
13-28-327-035-0000 70,908
13-28-327-036-0000 129,589
13-28-327-037-0000 173,884
13-28-329-019-0000 70,308
13-28-329-020-0000 30,207
13-28-329-037-0000 64,122
83
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04/02/2015
PAGE NO.
AGENC¥.r\,q3>.02i0-52'6^ ¦ .
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX- NUMBER OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL REAL ESTATE PROPERTY.WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
13-28-329-038-0000 13-28-329-039-0000 13-28-331-020-0000 13-28-331-021-0000 13-28-331-022-0000 13-28-331-023-0000 13-28-331-024-0000 13-28-331-025-0000 13-28-331-026-0000 13-28-331-027-0000 13-28-331-028-0000 13-28-331-043-0000 13-28-331-047-0000 13-28-428-018-0000 13-28-428-019-0000 13-28-428-020-0000 13-28-428-021-0000 13-28-428-022-0000 13-28-428-023-0000 13-28-428-028-0000 13-28-428-029-0000 13-28-428-030-0000 13-28-428-031-0000 13-28-428-034-0000 13-28-428-035-0000 13-28-428-036-0000 13-28-429-021-0000
86,117 131,792 206,480 79,185 ' ¦ 82,315 . 107,312 ;-- 92,299 7,793 179,744
;::^.63,p73'2
104,853 72/972 :jj|7l, 451|384 si;;.-:. 78,228 58,962 :: 14,806 13,862 14,666 43,147 257,091 : 133,440 65,802 68,434 189,553 149,314 174,819 103,016
84
CLRTM3 69 PAGE NO. 1.2
DATE 04/027-2015' AGENCY: .03^2(10^526 TA'FACWY^QF CHICAGO-^ELftONT/CENTRAI,
" PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER 19.98 EQUALIZEDASSESS:ED}|VALUATION;„
ft ¦ OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL .-vOFqEACH .LOT:77:BLOCK,' TRACT"OR PARCEL
REAL / ESTATE ^PROPERTY. WITHIN SUCH iWITHilSl iSUCH PROJECT AREA:
PROJECT AREA: ' - ^
13-28-429-022-0000 ?j 82,976
13-28-429-023-0000 , ; ;¦¦ 69,576
13-28-429-024-0000 J ¦ ^82 ,350
13-28-429-025-0000; lrR8,668:
13/-28-4 29:-026-0000; b» , i5j56;:-414.
f3^28"-42^-027-000I); v . \ 67,904
13-28-429-028-0000 13,585
13-28-429-029-0000 s . ' 13,585
13-28-429-030-0000 ¦» » 13,585
13-28-429-031-0000 C 13,585
13-28-429-032-0000 . -34,974
13-28-429-033-0000 .it 35,672
13-28-429-034-0000 , ^ 34,974
13-28-429-035-0000 ¦ ; ¦" 130,583
13-28-429-036-0000 : 1-i. 13,829
13-28-429-037-0000 13,829
13-28-429-038-0000 42,822
13-28-429-039-0000 - 35,929
13-28-429-040-0000 73,619
13-28-429-041-0000 61,419
13-28-429-042-0000|9 10|13-28-430-020-0000 63,688
13-28-430-021-0000 63,688'
13-28-430-027-0000 261,926
13-28-430-028-0000 55,457
13-28-430-029-0000 6,851
13-28-430-030-0000 6,851
85
CLRTM3 69
'DATE 04/02/2015
PAGE" NO .
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO- BELMONT/CENTRAL
.PERMANENT REAL - ESTATE INDEX; NUMBER OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL •
JREAL^ESTATE PROPERTY -WITHIN^SUCH""" t!I PROJECT1: AREA:
13-28-430-031-0000
1 3 - 2.8-430-032-000 0.
13-28-430-033-0000
13-28-430-034-0000
13-28-430-035-0000
13-28-430-040-0000
13-28-430-041-0000' i'
13-29-103-001-0000* ¦
13-29-103-002-0000
13-29-103-003-0000
13-29-103-004-0000
13-29-103-005-0000
13-29-103-006-0000
13-29-103-007-0000•
13-29-103-008-0000
13-29-103-009-0000
13-29-103-010-0000
13-29-103-011-0000
13-29-103-014-0000
13-29-103-015-0000
13-29-103-016-0000
13-29-103-017-0000
13-29-103-018-0000
13-29-103-019-0000
13-29-103-020-0000
13-29-103-021-0000
13-29-103-037-0000
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
63,12 6 29,714 29,714 20,461 :i49;869 207,853
i3^:p53;
rr72v$5~3 70,306
112,407 99,403 86,060 86,060 18,832
112,581 62,597 81,916 60,754 33,300 33,300 9, 910 69,623
'68,835 61,774 61,774
11.9, 118
109,274
86
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04/0272015
PAGE: NO.
AGENtYT,03-0'210,-52 6 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL;
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX' NUMBER OF EACH LOT^BLOCKv TRACT OR PARCEL. REAL ESTATE'PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH. PROJECT AREA:
13-29-103-038-0000
13-29-103-041-0000
13-29-103-042-0000
13-29-407-001-0000
13-29-40 7-002-0000
13-2 9-407-003-0000
13-2 9-407-0 0.4 - 0000
13-29-407-005-0000
13-29-407-006-0000
i3-2:9-40J7-041-0000
13-29-407-042-0000
13-29-407-043-0000
13-29-415-021-0000
13*- 29-415 - 022 -0 0.0 0'
13-29-415-023-0000
13-29-415-024-0000
13-29-415-025-0000
13-29-415-026-0000
'13^29-415-027-0000
13-29-415-028-0000
13-29-415-029-0000
13-29-415-030-0000
13-29-415-043-0000
13-29-424-045-0000
13-29-429-045-0000
13-29-430-039-0000
13-29-431-013-0000
19 98 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION OF EACH LOT,:BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL, WITHTN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
111, 565" 131,678 ^::9"lv579 E47;,N2-69: k3;8V242 20,975 11,089 t 11,089 174,978 ' 62,341 134,771 480,021 18,603 18,664 18,610 18,664 138,201 42,285 42,285 40: 052 40,052 103,702 355,801 704,095 308,371 289,739 136,684
87
CLRTM3 69.¦
DATE 04/02/2015¦,
PAGE NO.
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL .
PEIMMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER !j- OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
13-29-431-014-0000
13-29-431-015-0000
13-29-431-016-0.000
13-29-431-017-0000
13-29-431-018-0000
13-29-431-019-0000
13-29-431-020-0000
13-29-431-021-0000
1.3-29-431-022-0000
13-29-431-023-0000
13-29-431-024-0000
13-29.-431-025-0000
13-29-431-026-0000 13-29-431-028-0000 13-29-431-029-0000 13-32-205-001-0000 13-32-205-002-0000 13-32-205-003-0000 13-32-205-008-0000 13-32-205-009-0000 13-32-205-010-0000 13-32-205-045-0000 13-32-205-046-0000 13-32-205-047-0000 13-32-206-001-0000 13-32-206-002-0000 13-32-206-003-0000
1998. EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL :WI3?H§N:iSUCH PRpjJECT„;AREA:
fm : ¦ ¦s ir337,874
: 337,874
I 337, 874
337,874
;i33J^874-268,668 16,260 ¦i ;wj:17,-4T0'4 28,668 28,668 . . . 15,743 l^'|l^i5;|7:96 ^ ^3If438 861,821 118,013 7,2 90 45,329 35,659 i 35, 659 39,417 75,83 9 7,128 41,957 133,081 104,337 77,578
88
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04/02/2015
PAGE NO. f.v*i;6;
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIE CITY OF :CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
PERMANENT 'REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED^VALUATION OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL -WITHIN SUCH; PROJECT AREA:¦,
13-32-206-007-0000 13-32-206-008-0000 13-32-206-009-0000 13-32-206-041-1001 13-32-206-041-1002 ,13 r 3 2-20 6-041-1003 lf3^ 3 2-206-041-100 4' 13-32-207-001-0000 13-32-207-002-0000 13/73 2-207-0 03-0000 13-32-207-004-0000 13r32-207-005-0d00 13-32-207-006-0000 13-32-207-007-0000 13-32-2107-008-0000 13-33-101-010-0000 13-33-101-022-0000 13-33-102-001-0000 13-33-102-003-0000 13-33-102-004^-0000 13-33-102-005-0000 13-33-102-006-0000 13-33-102-007-0000 13-33-102-008-0000 13-33-102-009-0000 13-33-103-001-0000 13-33-103-002-0000
i 48,637
131, 424
:" V 131, 424
¦ ¦-. 4, 976 2,870 . ¦ 4,775 i j 2,499 ; 129,115
14, 987
-14 =SQ 1;
U „ e 63,987
. 63, 987
, 63,987
1151 " . 63,987
¦ J .: - : - 63 , 987
159,074
606,888
,146,785
. 67,691
rh.-; 31, 917
57,335 74,502 123,256 91,120 97,697 184,735 157,583
89
CLRTM369
DATE 04/02/2015
"¦ " PAGE .NO. . 17
AGENGY::-{03-02:10^526 TIF CITY 6F$CHICAGO^BELMONT/C ENTRALi r 1 *V £ ^
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX'NUMBER : OF EACH LOT;,; •BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL REAL ESTATE:'PROPERTY ¦ WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
13-33-103-003-0000
13-33-103-004-0000
13-33-103-005-0000
13-33-103-006-0000
13-33-103-007-0000
13-33-104-041-0000
; 13-33-107-002-0000
13-33-107-003-0000
13-33-20*0-001-0000 '
13-33-200-002-0000
13-33-200,-003,-0000
13-33-200-008-0000
13-33-200-013-0000
13-33-200-014-0000
13-33-200-015-0000
13-33-200-016-0000
13-33-200-017-0000
13-33-200-018-0000
" 13-33-200-019-0000
13-33-200-020-0000
13-33-200-021-0000
1.3-33-200-022-0000
13-33-200-023-0000
13-33-200-024-0000
13-33-200-046-0000
13-33-200-047-0000
13-33-202-001-0000
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
41,197
• s;' 41, 197 ^2 6,-54^7.
€m:£2 , 814 837,289 0
:i=:o,
:s103,748
':'- 7,717
51,750
. ''"ilv"687 .¦¦ 4i; 874
13,827 : 15,083 16,842
;J, 16, 622 14,536
-yflA,536 14,536 61,074
¦ ¦¦• 90,562 61,074 61,074 349,309 74,330 78,391
90
CLRTM369 PAGE NO. 3.8
DATE 04/02/2015 AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
PERMANENT REAI, ESTATE INDEX NUMBER 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
' REAL/ ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH ; WITHIN SUCH:? PROJECT AREA:/,^
PROJECT AREA: * ;;>;;i;. . ¦
13-33-202-002-0000 W I 104,676
1^4a3-202-0:03S-0000 - i 65,093
13-33>2*0"2--.ClO;4-0000 f'~" ™ i . 328,491
13-33-202-005-0000 *" — 12,251
13-33-202-006-0000 12,251
13-33-202-007-0000 12,251
13-33-202-008-0000 a '-¦ 147,145
13-33-202-009-0000 \\ ' 147,145
J3f3 3-2.02-010-0000 , 51,637
:i3"-%3;-202-011-0000 ; , 69,053
13-33-202-012-0000 • - : 95,105
13-33-202-013-0000 < \- ^Z.'¦ 92f3^
13-33-202-014-0000 ' I ^'i '-.-l 29/622
;l3k33"-202i-015-0000 65,299
13-33-202-01.6-0000 70,627
13-33-202-017-0000 33,698
13-33-202-018-0000 1 33, 698
13-33-202 -019-OOCO 38,698
13-33-202-020-0000 38,698
13-33-202-021-0000|9 10|13-33-202-022-0000|9 10|13-33-203-003-0000 13,655
13-33-203-004-0000 13;655
13-33-203-005-0000 59,511
13-33-203-006-0000 59,511
13-33-203-007-0000 38,126
13-33-203-008-0000 56,329
91
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04/02/2015
PAGE NO. 19
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHT-GAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL : :
\. - -^PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX . 'NUMBER , . ^^E^EAGH; iOTv BLOCK, TRACT'.OR PARCEL j REALS; ESTATE ¦'¦" PROPERTY \ WITH IN SUCH' ":: -PROJECT AREA:
13-33-203-009-0000
13-33-203-010-0000
13-33-203~011~0000':
13-33-203-012-0000
k ¦¦ ¦
13-33-203-013-0000
13-33-203-014-0000
" ~- ; 13 - 33-203-015 - 6tOi 0
13-33-203-016-0000 13-33-203-017-0000 13-33-203-018-0000 ,13-33-203-019-0000 . 13-33-203-020-OOpo: 13-33-203-021-0000 13-33-203-041-0000 13-33-203-042-0000
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED:VALUATION OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL .WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
¦¦¦*3B£-
¦ 65,428 65,428 11,828 , 11,828 142,574 54,454 54,454 ¦\ 30*117 34,650 ; 34,650 147^228 79,307 79,307 91,660 127,191
TOTAL INITIAL EAV FOR TAXCODE: 71077 TOTAL PRINTED: 501
92
CLRTM3 69 PAGE NO. 1
DATE 04/02/2015 AGENCY;: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO-;BE LMONT/GENTRAL
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER" 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
OF, EACH LOT/ BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL OF EACH LOT", BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL 'ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
PROJECT AREA: . •
13-20-424-034-0000 i.% . 132,252
13-20-424-035-0000 117,913
13-20-424-036-0000 146,415
13 - 2 0 - 424 -037 - 00 0 0, 2 70,2 6 0.
13j--2;0-429-027:r;g00P: : ^ !' 36, 025
13-20-429-028 00.00 52,764
13-20-429-029-0000 i 85,605
13-20-429-030-0000 69,166
13-20-429-031-0000 26,152
13-20-429-032-006o 26,152
13-20-429-036-1001 ' £ 4,822
13-20-429--'0-3;6^10'pZ ¦'"" ss ftf * ¦: 4f822
13-20-429-036-1003 :ll \ 4,822
13-20-429-036-1004 4,822
13-20-429-036-1005 2,489
13-20-429-036-1006 2,489
13-20-429-036-1007 ;; ; ; 2,608
13-20-429-036-1008 2,742
13-20-429-036-1009 2,545
13-20-429-036-1010 ^ 2,508
13-20-429-036-1011 ; 2,489
13-20-429-036-1012 2;508
13-20-429-036-1013 2,582
13-20-429-036-1014 2,742
13-20-429-036-1015 2,590
13-20-429-036-1016 2,546
13-20-430-009-0000 88,465
93
CLRTM3 69--. "~ : PAGE" NO,:
DATE 04/.02:/;2015 • AGENCY: 03-0210-(5;26/TIE ,CITY OF";CH IgAjSO-'BELMONT/CENTRAL.;. $
. PERMANENT REAL ESTATE1 INDEX,NUMBER . 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
...^Mla ,£:QE EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH J'^WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
PROJECT AREA: ' ' " . "¦
' 13-20^-430-010-0000 ;yi. ¦¦; ; j y / -39 927
13.-20-430-011-0000 ' . ( |L. " 96,336
-13-20-430-012-0000 .r- ¦¦ if ,a,-
: 1^20^43.0-034-0000 " / .'"" ,¦„".¦'' :0,
13-20-431-026-0000 fy ,. 252,382
,13-20-431-028-0000 Ia,..., . : 0
.13-2 0'-.431-030-a6"]3*0, f U»-^''^3^9,821*
13-20-431-031-0000 , 499,106
13-20-431-032-0000 ^yyf 499,106
13-20-431-034-0000. r . . ,^ 0
13-20-432.-025-0000 i 78,542
13-20-432-026-0000' i^: 79,268
13-20-432-028-0000 rfy 82,738
13-20-432-029-0000 ;y, 231,340
13-20-432-030-0000 316,814
13-20-432-038-0000/ 106,730
13-20-432-039-0000 135,801
13-20-432-040-0000 195,890
13-20-432-041-0000 259,51.7
13-20-432-042-0000 61,42-3
13-20-432-043-0000 59,886
13-20-433-011-0000 559,160
13t20-433-015-0000 349,002
13-20-433-018-0000 289,271
13-20-433-019-0000 192,594
13-20-433-020-0000 455,597
13-20-433-021-0000 266,196
94
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04/02/201;5;
PAGE.NO.
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER OF EACH LOT, BLOCK,, TRACT OR PARCEL REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH „? PROJECT AREA:
1998-- EQUALIZED ASSESSED/VALUATION OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
13-20-433-022-0000>
13-21-319-001-0000
13-21-319-021-0000
13-21-323-001-0000
13-21-323-016-0000
13-21.-327-001-0000
13-21-3 2.7-017-0000
-13f 2lS 327-018-0000
13-21-327-019-0000
13-21-327-020-0000
13-21-327-023-0000
13-21-327-024-0000
!$f2JS3.27---0 25-0000
13-21-327-026-0000
13-21-327-027-0000
13-21-327-028-0000
13-21-327-029-0000
13-21-327-032-0000
13-21.-327-033-0000
13-21-327-034-0000
13-21-327-036-0000
13-21-327-037-0000
13-21-328-022-0000
13-21-328-023-0000
13-21-328-024-0000
13-21-328-025-0000
13-21-328-026-0000
458,838 80,133 106,761 286,962 309,520 316,083 s'3*3-9;;7b5 174,370 125,556 182,813 104,807 174,16.3 223,444 168,1.81 61,122 61,122
62,777
150,005 68,994 49,030 67,473 41,914 58,999 29,540 29,-540 52,318 52,318
95
CLRTM3 69,:: " ~ PAGENOA <
DATE 04702/201'5'-:'-. C'AG^gY,-::^03-.0.2:l'0^52.6- TIP/CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/GENTRAL:;
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
• <:: ' OF each lot, block, tract or parcel of each lot, block,: TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH WiTHIN>;SUGHi? PROJECT tAREA: .
PROJECT. AREA: ' "" "" ....... .. .j^,^
13-21 -328-030-0000 : / ' :.;:" 25,367
•i:3-2.1^328-031-0'b'6"0-' &j13-21-328-032-0000 51,341
13-21-328-033-0000 , - *, ¦¦¦¦ ¦ ¦ 51,341
13-21-328-034-0000 ,?,.;,,,f:. ^72ji72;|
13-21-328-035-0000 f \\...- ;v - 372,728.
; i^;--?!.'^? 2 8 - 0 3 6 - 0.0.00' ssf.3 ¦ rt,f» *C. 57,458
13-21-328-037-0000 ; :' riv57,r458'
13-21-328-038-0000 27,526
13-21-328-039-0000 c:.#!f~U,; ¦ ¦. 82,091
13-21-328-040-0000 rvk\.\ pp*^, 82, 091 ¦
13-21-328-041-0000 : 28,038
13-21-328- 042-0000 198,807
13-21-328-043-0000 114,698
13-28-100-001-0000 . 137,323
13-28-100-002-0000 : . ;;./>.;^ 81,060
13-28-100-003- 0000 p 105,862
13-28-100-008-0000 56, .196
13-28-100-009-0000 56,196
13-28-100-012-0000 :ivj-^ 84, 896
13-28-100-013-0000 84,896
13-28-100-014-0000 "152,591
13-28-1.00-01.5-0000 152,591
13-28-100-016-0000 65,656
13-28-100-017-0000 65,656
13-28-100-018-0000 77,796
13-28-100-019-0000 77,796
96
CLRTM369 " f* i DATE 04/02/2015
PAGE NO.
AGENCY:-03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER OF'EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL REALIeSTATE/pROPERTY WITH IN SUCH PROJECT AREA: "'
13-28-100-041 -0000
13-28-100-042-0000
13-28-100-043-0000
13-28-100-046-0000
13-28-100-047-0000
13-28-100-048-0000
13-28-100-049-0000
13-28-101-004-0000
13-28-101-0 0 5-0 0 0 0
13-28-101 - 006 -' 00 0 0
13-28-101-007-0000
13-28-101-008-0000
13-28-101-039-0000
1'3- 28-102-001.-0000
13-28-102-006-0000
13-28-102-042;-0000
13-28-102-044-0000
13-28-103-007-0000
13-28-103-008-0000
13-28-103-009-0000
13-28-103-042-0000
13-28-103-043-0000
13-28-108-011-0000
13-28-108-016-0000
13-28-108-017-0000
13-28-108-018-0000
13-28-108-019-0000
1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION &'6F'\EACH LOT, ; BLOCKV fPRACT/OR PARCEL
¦-¦
.61 a V. 117,893
1 ( 204,765
v- s 242,427
.104,970
106,247
, 342, 157
H II. 215,900
:: S: ;||156.,5.41
r:V;.- : °- 179,334
— hy 67,097
- Jiy ¦ 67, 097
O^UM., -^;.3;2.7-;"-62'o-
|- 215, 370
.ii; 221,879
121,580
842 ,791
' 97, 873
> :w ¦ 77,452 ¦ 77,452 226,1.43 198,609 106,996 126,870 80,349 . 54,290 67,246 59,167
97
CLRTM369 : '.PAGE NO. ,6.
DATE 6.47 02/2 015 AGENCY: 03-021 0-526 TIF CITY OF CHI C AGO - BELMONT / C ENTRAL
is L, PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
HAJS OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL OF ;:EACHV^LOT:,fCBLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA: a
PROJECT AREA: " ¦ ¦ ¦-j ^
13-28-108-042-0000 ' 134,073
73;-28^^8-b44-0pO0 " ...232,384
' 13-28-108-045-0000': ih,,.,; ; . ' 231,941 ¦
353J%8/jL;Q8,-04 6-0000 212,109
I'f3-28::i#l-6-OOl-0000 ' . :. ^™**273,399
13-28-116-002-0000|9 10|13-28-116-003-0000 1 •mi^- 0
13-28-116-004-0000 /ji.-, m . ¦' /.':v-: ¦ fii 0
13-28-116-005-0000 HI^MSO
13-28-116-008-0000 ¦ A;;^ , 25,163
13-28-116-009 -0000 85,596
13-28-116-017-0000 35^:, .141,883
13-28-116-018-0000 V%\ 5 p^rf ? 2,517
13-28-116-042-0000 49,989
13-28-116-044-0000 " 123,112
13-28-116-045-0000 . H, 0
13-28-116-046-Oppq -^,,,:if.: ; 128,932
13-28-116-047-0000 <'"> --"'U;. ¦-.-k<24 , 591
13-29-200-005-0000 ¦¦¦7fi^87V220
13-29-200-006-0000 123,227
13-29-200-007-0000 34,793
13-29-200-008-0000 73,096
13-29-200-039-0000 ' ' 149,883
13-29-202-006-0000 27,179
13-29-202-007-0000 59,051
13-29-202-008-0000 101,718
13-29-202-009-0000 126,566
98
CLRTM3 69
DATE 04 /0272015 ^AGENGYT:;i -"0.3- 0210-526 TIF CITY
:PERMANENT;«REAL {ESTATE INDEX NUMBER,,
OF' EACH LOT,----BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL : REAL"ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH ? PROJECT AREA:
13-29-202-038-0000
13-29-203-0 01-0 000
13_29-203-002-0000
13-29-203-004-0000
13-29-2C3-0O5-00OQ iL 13^2-9^2.03-006-pOOO:
13-293203-035-0000
13-29-203-036-0000
13-29-204-008-0000
13-29-204-046-0000
13-29-204-047-0000
13-29-204-048-0:000
13-29-204-049-0000
13-29-204-050-0000
13-29-204-051-0000 A- 13-29-204-052-0000
13-29-205-006-0000
13-29-205-007-0000
13-29-205-008-0000
13-29-205-009-0000
13-29-205-010-0000-
13-29-205-039-0000
13-29-205-040-0000
13-29-205-041-0000
13-29-206-006-0000
13-29-206-007-0000
13-29-206-008-0000
PAGE NO. —7
OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL,
-1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION OF .EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL WITHIN'; SUCH PROJECT AREA ip- ' ' "
24,-03 8 295,435 104 , 87.1 *5.1.151 51,151 ... 61,750 287,592 211,350 247,931 1,840 1,840 1,840 1,399 1, 840 1,840 2,455 53,700 :" 53,700 54;i97 65,665 98,318 100,668 165,675 136,765 137,177 137,177 137,177
99
CLRTM3 69 ' :'V DATE 04/02/2015
PAGE NO.
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 'TIF 'CITY OF'CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
' PERMANENT REAL "ESTATE INDEX NUMBER -
OF.• EACH LOT, BLOCK, .TRACT OR* PARCEL
REAL -ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH ¦ .
PROJECT AREA:
1998 EQUAL!ZED ASSESSED VALUATION OF EACH '. LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL 'WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA: :
13-29-206-009-0000^ 13-29-206-010-0000 13-29-206-041-0000 13-29-206-042-0000 13-29-207-004-0000 13-29-207-005-0000 .13-29-207-006-0000 13-29-207-007-0000 13-29-207-012-0000 13-29-207-021-0000 13-29-207-022-0000 13-29-207-023-0000 13-29-207-024-0000 13-29-207-025-0000 13-29-207-026-0000 13-29-207-027-0000 13-29-207-028-0000 13-29-207-029-0000 13-29*207-030-0000 13-29-207-031-0000 13-29-207-032-0000 13-29-207-033-0000 13-29-207-034-0000 13-29-207-040-0000 13-29-207-044-0000 13-29-207-045-0000 13-29-207-046-0000
137,177 :150,106 343,875 250,791 109,621 125,028 #122 j:82 6 ¦¦>462559j4 0
"0 0 0
• • 0 191,323 90,721 90,721 231,078 103,785 68,392 82,932 47,971 48,675 270,475 0 0 0
100
CLRTM3 69 PAGE NO. 9"
DATE 04/02/2015 AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL L
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER- 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION?
OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL ; OF EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL
REAL "ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH ,WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA: ^
PROJECT AREA:
13-29-215-023-0000 .TV 13,108
13-29-215-024-0000 69,964
13-29-215-025-0000 83,968
13-29-215-026-0000 -iJ- .83,968
13-29-215-027-0000 111,942
: 13-29-215-029-0000 35,620
13-29-215-030-0000 35,620
13-29-215-031-000O 108,027
13-29-215-032-0000 94,272
13-29-215-033-0000 86,150
13 -29-215-034-0000 2 6,076
13-29-215-035-0000 24,598
13-29-215-036-0000 99,436
1.3-29-215-037-0000 99,436
13-29-215-040-0000 13,108
13-29-215-041-0000 13,108
13-29-215-042-0000 286,847
13-29-215-043-0000 180,779
13-29-215-044-0000 212,368
13-29-223-033-0000 115,118
13-29-223-038-0000 174,392
13-29-223-039-0000 174,392
13-29-223-041-0000|9 10|13-29-223-042-0000 207,644
13-29-223-043-0000 503,941
TOTAL INITIAL EAV FOR TAXCODE: 71078 27,954,236
TOTAL PRINTED: 241
101
PAGE NO/A; >pi
AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER OF EACH EOT,: BLOCK, TRACT-feOR PARCEL REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH • PROJECT AREA:
13-20-431-033-0000'
13-29-215-028-0WW
; .-1998 EQUALIZED^ASSESSE.D VALUATION
OF EACH sLOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL t WITHIN SUCH PROJECT AREA:
0 35,646
34, 411
TOTAL INITIAL EAV FOR TAXCODE: 71079 TOTAL: .PRINTED:4 2
dir70, 057
*s sis '|10 *|*:rs™ ! .
urn?-
102
CLRTM3 6% PAGE.NO. "1
DATE 04/02/2015 AGENCY: 03-0210-526 TIF CITY. OF CHICAGO-BELMONT/CENTRAL
PERMANENT REAL ESTATE INDEX NUMBER 1998 EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION
OF .EACH LOT, BLOCK, TRACT OR PARCEL OF EACH LOT; BLOCK, TRACT .OR PARCEL
REAL ESTATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH WITHIN SUCH /PROJECT AREA:'
PROJECT AREA:
13-21-120-019-0000 28,659
13-21-304-003-0000 76,475
13-21-308-003-0000- 28,783
13-28-124-055-0000 -¦ 74,143
13-28-324-00 5-0000 24,273
13-28-324-012-0000 25,/ 297
13-28-326-035-0000 29,385
13-28-32 6-0 3 6-0000 30,173
13-29-20.7-013-0000 29,701
13-32-2 06-006-0000 5 8,659
13-33-102-002-0000 13,750
13-33-103-008-0000 34,113
13-33-103-009-00005 22,577
13-33-103-010-0000 31,360,
13-33-103-011-0000 28,637
13-33-103-012-0000 34,970
13-33-103-013-0000 14,973
13-33-103-014-0000 21,751
13-33-103-015-0000 18,570
13-33-103-016-0000 15,039
13-33-103-017-0000 10,239
13-33-103-018-0000 21,764
13-33-103-019-0000 31,776
13-33-103-020-0000 23,050
13-33-103-021-0000 27,368
13-33-103-022-0000 17,901
13-33-103-023-0000 31,190
TOTAL INITIAL EAV FOR TAXCODE: 71080
103
TOTAL PRINTED:
104
PLAN APPENDIX
Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study
;¦ M : !. MS : ?A ifi
¦¦¦¦¦f--. i« " .j ;:.* :¦:¦; m ; r^, ;„.. ,.:,m:; f ia
Added Area ELIGIBILITY STUDY
—1 March1
105
Belmont/Central TIF Rcdevciopment;'Plan and Project
Amendment No. 2 City of Chicago
I. Introduction
PGAV . PJLANNERS (the "Consultant" op "PGAV") in conjunction withy Ernest ;R, Sawyer
E'nte^ «^Sn<. retained by the^City; pf/^ to aVnerVd lhe •
Belmont/Sentfal Tax,Increment Financing ("TIF") Redevelopment Plan ("Plan") and Project Area
(the '"priginal Area"), as approved in January of 2000, revised in May of 2000, and as amended
by AiMhdment^ 2011. AjTiepd.mejTt\Np;;2 .(tfie. "Arriendrtient") provides ;a plan
amendment document and adds additional area ("Project Area") to the Original Area to create the new area (the "Amended Area"). These references apply only to this Eligibility Study.
For purposes of the Amendment, this Eligibility Study considers only the Project Area and this
Eligibility Study is referred to in the Amendment as the "Added Area Eligibility Study." Prior to
the preparation of the Amendment, the Consultant undertook various surveys and investigations
of the Project Area, containing approximately 670 parcels, to determine whether the Project
Area'jg^ijfie's^r; designation as a tax increment financihgl'distric^^ Illinois'"Tax
Increment^fpcati Act, ,65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq as amended (the "Act")"
¦ Thefexh'ibits: included swith the Amendment andthisfAdded-Area E|j^0il|ty/Study are^
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit A - Boundary Map (A map of the
boundaries of the Amended Area) ' .
v Plan Ap^njdix/Attachment Two.ExhibTtj'B}^ Existing Land Use (The existing land
uses of the Amended Area) _ _ , . .
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibits C1 and C2 - General Land Use Plan (The Amended Area Land Use Plan divided into north and south maps)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit D - Existing Zoning (Existing zoning classifications regarding the Amended Area)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit E - Sub Area Key (The Project Area as divided into 13 sub areas)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibits G1 through G6 - Existing Conditions
(The existing conditions in the Project Area only)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit H - Adjacent TIF / Redevelopment Areas
(Redevelopment Areas adjacent to the Amended Area)
o Plan Appendix, Attachment Three - Legal Description (The Amended Area)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Four - Parcel Listing (A Parcel Identification Number ("PIN") listing of the Project Area)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Five - Added Area Eligibility Study (This Eligibility Study regarding the Project Area only)
Plan Appendix, Attachment Six - Housing Impact Study (A Housing Impact Study ("HIS") regarding the Amended Area)
This Eligibility Study includes the analyses and findings of the Consultant's work and is the responsibility of PGAV which has prepared this Eligibility Study with the understanding that the City would rely: 1) on the findings and conclusions ofthis Eligibility Study in proceeding with the
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment Five, Page .1
POjGVplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
designation of the Project Area as a redevelopment project area under the Act, and 2) on the fact that PGAV has obtained the necessary information to conclude that the Project Area can be designated as a redevelopment project area in compliance with the Act.
Following this introduction, Section II presents background information of the Amended Area .including thev-didgraphic location, description of current conditions, and other"data; Section III provides the building and infrastructure conditions assessment arid qualification documentation as>tp the qualifications of the Project Area as a.conservation and/or blighted area as defined in the Act; and Section IV, Summary and Conclusions, summarizes the findings of this Eligibility Study regarding the Project Area.
"This Eligibility Study is to become a part of the Redevelopment Plan for the Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Area. * Other" portions of the Redevelopment Plan contain information and documentation as required by the Act for a redevelopment plan.
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) Attachment Five, Page 2
PGErnest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Helmotit/Ccntral T1K Redevelopment Plan and Project: ' . :-| ¦ ¦'¦
Amendment No: 2 City of Chicago
II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION . + ¦-
Location and Size of Project Area
The Belmont/Central Redevelopment Project Area is located approximately nine (9) miles
northwest of Downtown Chicago, located in the Portage Park and Belmont gragia
neighborhoods. ¦ ^ : . :y
The • Original Area ^ is ; irregularly shaped and the.: boundaries ;genera|lyi|folipw;.commercial corridors, along several major streets. The Original Area'includes property, that flanks Central Avenue from Berenice Avenue to Fullerton Avenue, Belmont Avenue from Meade Avenue to Leclaire Avenue, and Fullerton Avenue from Mango Avenue to Lamon Avenue.
The Project Area for thejAmendme^ along the west side of sCentral Avenue frorry 1
!Newpq|1;Av(em First \^X^\'C&x%ir (formerly-
"6ur"'t;ady ;6f the Resurrection Medical Center^ east ajqhg'the south sideYofrNewpo^^^^ from Central to and incjudjng Chopin Park; south along the west side of Laramie Avenue from the Original Area near Belmont Avenue to Wellington Avenue, along Laramie Avenue from roughly George Street to the Original Area at Fullerton Avenue and including Cragin Park, east and west along Diversey Avenue from Merrimac Avenue to an alley just west of Cicero, and west along Fullerton from Mango Avenue to^Melvina Avenue. The Project Area contains 135.9 acres in 670 parcels; with 43.1 acres for public rights-of-way for streets, alleyways, rail lines, and highways. The Project Area contains 92.8 acres (68%) of improved land that is either presently developed or vacant.
The Amended Area will comprise the Original *and Project Areas^and will generally include the block face to the respective parallel alley on both sides of the streets listed above.
Description of Current Conditions Area Characteristics
The Project Area is located partly within fourteen (14) 2010 U.S. Census Tracts: 1506, 1511, 1512, 1902, .1903, 1904.01, 1904.02, 1906.01, 1906.02, 1907.01, 1907.02, 1908, 1913.01, and 1913.02. These tracts, along with tracts 1507, 1510.01, 1711, 1911, and 1912 ofthe Original Area, comprise the Amended Area.
The Project Area is located partly within in three (3) City wards: 30, 31, and 36- A small portion of the Original Area is also in Ward 38.
There are five (5) TIF redevelopment areas that are adjacent to the Amended Project Area: the Belmont/Cicero TIF, the Diversey/Narragansett TIF, the Galewood/Armitage TIF, the Northwest Industrial Corridor TIF, and the West Irving Park TIF. Only the Belmont/Cicero and Diversey/Narragansett TIF's are adjacent to.the Project Area.
The Amended Area is described in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Three - Legal Description and is also provided as a map in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two Exhibit A - Boundary Map.
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment Five, Page 3
PQ^Vplanners
Ernest. R. Sawyer Enterprises
Gity of Chicago
Existing Land Use Mf^yh. ¦. ¦ & r- v--:v ??•?-~-.-y.--q ;
A tabulation of land area by land Use category is provided below iri Table 1 - Tabulation of
Existing L'andf.Use, The Project Area consists primarily of commercial uses, followed^by
ygjsictehtia^ of the Belmont/Central TIF, it is borderediby >
'derTselresideritiai uses^ typicallyllocated,aeross^a rear aH the-main commercial¦ corridors'^
There) are Ittr^^ and Cragin Parkin the Projjct;
Area and Blackhawk Park in the Original Area. There- are six school uses in the Original Area and two such uses in the Project Area.
. Table 1 - ' ,
Tabulationfof Existing Land Use . .''.r-";^;''"'" "'f^l'ifi-";
»,Belmont/Central Amendment No; 2 , ." , -¦; j-,,--.^¦ .,- ;„::':,.¦¦"+i"
* ::^v Project Area' % of Project OrigihalArea % of Original Total Amended % of Total fcxisung Land use • (acres) Area (acres) Area Area2 (acres) Amended Area
Single-Family Residential ¦ ,j y.,i- 2.5 18% 1.3 0.7% " ; 3.8 - : - 1.2% .
Multi-rFamiiyResidential fe - »..(-: I 9.3% .3.5 i.8%- : 16.2 5.0%
Mixed-Use (Residential / Commercial) ' rr,. '1-3 ""Is V isl3:6;:;".;; ': 7.2% , 24 9 7.6% "'"
Corhmeraal,(Retail/Service / Office) ,J . 31.0 "'¦": "' 22.8% "'' 63.0 " 33.2% " 94.0' " 28.9%
Industrial "".¦¦¦¦'"(' "'7ox., ¦": 0.3% . r 0.7 "' 0.4% '. 1.1 ¦¦¦¦¦¦ 0.3%
Public / Semi-Public / Institutional 10.8 7.9% 21.4 " 11.3% ' 32.2 9.9%
Park / Open Space >¦ 11.1 8.2% 6.2 3.3% 17:3 5.3%
Public Parking Lot „, ^ , 10.8 -1 7.9% .;',;/ i= 0 6%. ' , ' , . 11.9 ., 3.7%",v;
Utility ¦¦ ~ 04 0 3% . .. . 0.2 0.1% " ' 0.6 " ! 0.2% '
Vacant / Undeveloped Land ? ' . 1.8 ' ' 1.3% 1.7 0.9% 3.5 1.1%
Right-of-Way , 43.1 31.7% 77 2 40.7% 120.3 38.9%
TOTAL * 135.9 189.9 325.8 100.0% -
1The Prefect Area In tnls Eligibility Study Is tho Added Area In the Redevelopment Plan- ay,-: .<.'¦ * The Amended Area in this Eligibility Study is tho Project Areo or Area In the Redevelopment Plan, fjoto- Percentage and acreage figures ore approximated due to rounding
The existing land uses in the Amended Area are identified in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit B - ExistingjLknd^yse; Land use data for the Project Area was compiled as part; of the TIF eligibility fieldwork, along with, the Original Area to determine the overall Amended Area land use characteristics' to be used for the Amendment. This fieldwork was conducted in the fall of 2014. ;,
¦ " " ;yJ "";™ if '
In classifying land use for this TIF eligibility report, it is important to clarify the use of the term
"vacant land". The. Act establishes one (1) set of eligibility criteria for designation of improved
land and a separate set of criteria for designation of vacant land. The full definition of "vacant
land" and the full set of criteria are provided in Section III of this study. In short, under the Act
all parcels without buildings are considered "vacant". 'Only 1.8 acres (1.3%) of the Project Area
is vacant land. The vacant property in the. Project Area is on 22 of the overall 670 parcels and
represents a small opportunity for in-fill development and devitalization. - yi:
As shown in Table 1 - Tabulation of Existing Land Use, above, the largest land use by land percentage in the Project Area is Right-of-Way (31.7%), followed by Commercial uses (22.8%), Residential uses (11.1% total multi-family and single-family), Mixed-use (8.3%), Park/Open. Space (8.2%), Public/Semi-Public/lnstitutional (7.9%) and Public Parking/Lot (7.9%): All other uses in the Project Area account for less than 4% of the total. The majority of the net Project Area (without the Right-of-Way, utilities, vacant land, and park / open space), is commercial/mixed-use or residential. The residential density is generally greater away from the primary commercial corridors.
PGQVplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Central T;IE Redevelopment Plan and PrpjecC^* ;^ Amendment No. 2
£?:*' ..' ¦ ¦ ¦' 'City of Chicago,:
A total of 598 structures'are located on the 135.9 acres of improved land in the Project Area. Of
these structures, 154 are accessory buildings, such as garages, outbuildings or other secondary
structures. The improved portions of the Project Area comprise about 50% of net land area.:
According to field 6b^r^i6nfl94%iOf buildih^!i(563;6Mh6 598j=|otal) were judged to be more
than 35 years old, which^m^ Area may qualify as a
"conservation ,area" ifia;com^^ fa'do^ar^f^ present such thaVtHe'p^ safety^healtb.^oralsr or welfare arid the" area- ma^ lipele!!^ III. Qualification ofthe project Areaj. "
'The types of residentiaLuses wrt^^
and lands usessuwey conducted; as .part completed in
'20i4*and! revealedMh^^^ 1,035 housing units, „
1,021 of which'.were occupied-~ BecaUseVthe Project Area contains more than 75 inhabited
residential united is required to perform a
Housing Impact Study ("HIS") as part of the feasibility report (see Subsection 11.74.4-3(n)(5) of
the Act). The HIS; includesuthe^Orjginal Are^^^ for the entire
Belmont/Gentral ^TIF ¦Redevelopment ;Area. Tne .HIS is found in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Six- Housing Impactf Study;^ .
Development Activity and Assessed Value Trends n ,
Historic data regarding the Equalized Assessed Value (the "EAV") for each parcel in the Project Area, the rate of EAV growth for the City, and the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (the "CPI-U") in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha MSA for the period between 2008 and 2013 are considered to identify development activity and determine assessed value trends in the Project Area. Table 2 - Equalized Assessed Value Trends, on the following page, illustrates the comparison of the Project Area's EAV'growth to both the remainder of the City's EAV and the CPI-U. ~*
The upper half of Table 2 demonstrates that between 2008 and 2013, the EAV of the Project Area decreased from $83.5 million to $60.5 million. The table also demonstrates that: ; ^
In at least: 3 of the past 5 years (four years; demonstrated), EAV growth ofthe Project Area has declined;
In at;|i^pt^oftH^past 5 years (three years demonstrated); EAV growth of the Project Area has'been less than the EAV growth of the remainder of the City; and,
in the bottorrf half of Table 2; > - ^
In at least 3 ofthe past 5 years (four years demonstrated), EAV growth of the Project Area has been less than the CPI-U of the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha Metropolitan
• Statistical Area (MSA). -yx
Additionally, it is important to consider the ability of the Project Area to generate tax revenue. Of the 670 parcels in the Project Area, 95 are owned by an entity that is exempt from property tax and 4 parcels are found to have been delinquent for the 2013 taxpayers; listing;-neither of these factors significantly impacts the Project Area's ability to generate tax revenue.
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) PCAVPLANNERS
Attachment Five, Page 5 110 Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
BelmontyCcritral -TIF'Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
Table 2 . ;,:if?. Equalized Assessed Value Trends
iyl • ' ' f^<^ri*=rt^;^Hfl^^fe-'¦ Is ^e^'^EAV growth^fate ¦ tower
. ;VfRroied (Added) % Change from • \ ' '^p^C^am^^":^ «ton jhij Mam»;of thVCttjr*>^
:'.;;< j/:|l;.'AreaEAV^,t-' Pre'viqus.Year ,. Bajafoceftf City ^v^lPnsvio^y|ah;' . ;, 'EAVi'growth rate5?.;;.'". '
Belmont Central Amendment No. 2 Project Area Comparison of EAV Growth Rate's
: 2008 . $83,513,633- $80,894,029,387 - '¦ '• ..
2009 $92,854,471 11.2% $84,493,953,218 4.5% 1NO
2010 $86,139,001 ' -7.2% $82,001,031,062 -3.0% ,, YES
2011 :i$74,370;268; -13.7% $75,048,543,642. - -8.5%. ¦ yes
2012 ' : $64,831,405. -12.8% $65,185,555,862 r -13.1% ...
2013:' $60,481,662 -6.7% $62,303,394,002 -4.4% ":7_T_"" yes .
1 Cooiff County Assessor data-compiled by ERSE, 2014. -Citywide EAV less the Project (Added) Area EAV. Source'is Cook County Clerk's Agency.Tax Rate Reports for City of .Chicago;
Comparison to Consumer Price Index
¦J'^Jt.',f,(l5
2008.
215.303
$00 ;"f|||Project {Added)>^, % Chahge-from; $ |*l]§*:r V .;.<^iiAteayear^,
.$831513,633
$92,854,471
2010:
2011
2012"
2013
;$86,139,0Q1
$74,370,268
$64,831,405 $60,481,662
-7.2%
-13.7% -12.8%
¦¦•6.7%|109|Cook County Assessor data compiled by ERSE. 2014. , 1|109|Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U): source is U.S.'Bureau oriiaborStatistics. ¦¦^s
Prior Redevelopment Efforts
As noted, five (5) existing TIF redevelopment project areas are adjacent to the>Amehded Project Area. However, only the Belmont/Cicero TIF (City index number T-82) to the east and the Diversey/Narragansett TIF (T-129) to the southwest border the Project Area. The boundaries of all of these TIF redevelopment project areas are identified in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibit H - Adjacent TIF / Redevelopment Areas.
Chicago Enterprise Zone #5 overlaps the Project Area-to the south-along Fullerton Avenue; with
only the property on the south side of Fullerton Avenue in both the Enterprise Zone and the
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Area. :--'V:''-:R:--:- . - ^ .
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment Five, Page (i
POAVplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Beimpiit/Gentral XIK Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendmcht No. 2
III. QUALIFICATION OFTHE P RO j ECT/, Aj$E A
A. Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act
The Act authorizes Illinois-municipalities to redevelop locally designated deteriorated areas through tax increment financing. In-order for an area"tO'iqualify^a'sia- tax irterement-financing^ district, it must first'^be designated as a blighted area, a conservation area (or a combination of the two), or an industrial park conservation area as,defined at 5/1.1-74.4r3(a) of the Act.
Based on the criteria set forth in the Act, the improved portion of the Project Area is determined a
to qualify as a conservation area, and the vacarifeportion of the Area is determined to qualify as
a blighted area. y ;;: f
: ^. j{ -^Cjp^JSH* " ¦' *~f-i ;y '¦' .' ¦ :a : .silt, ¦, ^ ¦.
As set^oTth' in thel^cra cons^rvatibn area is: ' '
"conservation area means any improved area withinr-the boundaries of a redevelopment project area located within the territorial limits of the municipality in
&i^wtiicffi$ areaihave aifage of'35^y0ars.-6r;moreW:wrH
~"-%uc^aH^atea-is not yet a blighted area-but because of a combination of three (3) or^---" more of the following factors is detrimental to the public safety, health, morals or
r ^^-We/fare:an'^;swc/j>h:area maybecome.a.blighted'area: / "
Dilapidation. An advanced state of"disrepair or neglect of necessary repairs to the primary structural components .of buildings or {trip™
" combination; fflai ''^rdocurhented building1.conditiphfanalyl^
major repair is required or the defects are so^serious "arid 'sa:ex^0psi\r6':thaT 'the
buildings must be removed. ' :„, ¦„,,:
Obsolescence. The condition or-process•qfJallin6'jnto''disase'l- Siructures'have become ill-s'uiiW/fprth'e'6nginal use. •¦'
Deterioration. With respect to buildings, defects including, but not limited to, major defects in the secondary building components .such as doors, windows, porches, gutters and downspouts, and fascia. With respect to surface improvements, that the condition of roadways, alleys, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking, and surface storage areas evidence deterioration, including, but not limited to, surface^ crackiijg)i§cry loose
ii -j- paving "material, and weeds pmtmdirigythrougn pavedssurfaces.
Presence of structures below minimum code standards. All structures thai do
not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire, and other
governmental codes applicable to-property, but not including housing and
property maintenance codes. ; ,
Illegal use of individual structures: The use of structures in violation of applicable federal, State, or local laws, exclusive of those applicable to the presence of structures below minimum code standards.
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) PG^VpLANNERS
Attachment Five, Page 7 Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment'No.,2. ....
Excessive vacancies. The presence of buildings that are unoccupied or tinder-utilized and that represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent, or duration ofthe vacancies
Lack of ventilation, light, or sanitary facilities. The absence of adequate ventilation for light or air circulation in spaces or rooms without windows, or that require the removal of dust, odor, gas;smoke;-or other noxious airborne materials. Inadequate natural light and ventilation' means the absence or inadequacy'of^skylights or windows for interior spaces or rooms and improper window sizes and amounts by room area to window area ratios. Inadequate sanitary facilities refers to the absence or inadequacy of garbage storage and enclosure, bathroom facilities, hot water and kitchens, and structural
m'm inadequacies preventing ingress and egress to and from all rooms and units
within a building. ''¦ ' ' .... .
(8) " Inadequate utilities. Underground and overhead utilities such as storm sewers
nimt&nti"storm drainage, sanitary sewers, electrical services that are shown to be: inadequate. Inadequate utilities are
;?^~ih6se that are: - - - • . 1 =
of insufficient capacity to serve the uses in the redevelopment project area,
deteriorated, antiquated; obsolete, or in disrepair, or
lacking within the redevelopment project area. - ¦
faciiitiesViTjj^o]^ ;^6cessl§ry:facliiU designation of:an.area: aV' 6W^
presence of buildings^eiihem on parcels
of inadequate size antf ^tia^^ standards of
development for health and safety and the presence of multiple buildings on a
single parcel, or :^r&^d^b^;'finding of excessive land coverage, these
parcels-must^exhibit; more of the) following; insufficient
provision. ^ or around:buii8ings^ihcrea^ed^hreai of spread
of 'finWd&U f^c/ose proximity of buildings^lack^ access
to a< $bli& off-street sparking, or-
inadequate provtslbW^^ seryice:^]'¦'¦%'* ¦ — v.
Deleterious land use or layout. The existence of incompatible land-use relationships, buildings occupied by inappropriate mixed-uses, or uses considered to be noxious, offensive, or unsuitable for the surrounding area.
Lack of community planning. The proposed redevelopment project area was developed'•prior to or without the benefit or guidance of a community plan. This means that the development occurred prior to the adoption by the municipality of a comprehensive or other community plan or that the plan was not followed at the time of the area's development. This factor must be documented by evidence of adverse or incompatible land-use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels of inadequate shape and size to meet
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment Five, Page 8
PG^Vplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Beliiiont/Cenlral Til"'KcHbvclopmc^ :;.T"
Amendment No. 2 * City of Chicago
contemporary development standards, or other evidence demonstrating an
k'jMserice^6fieffhdive-c^ -as s*
(12) The area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection. Agency-or. United' States
) rEnvironmehiahPro for, or a study conducted by
an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or federal law, . provided' that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment tb.the development or redovelopmenVof the redeveldpmentfprbject: area.
(13) The total equalized assessed value ofthe proposed redevelopment project area.
"ir£as;Mc//rietf last five (5) calendar^
^available, or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the , >?i:: -:^ ¦ ^m0ihip]a^ty for%ree (3)cofthe4astfivei(5) calendar years fon which information, is available or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by^he United States Department pf L'abor or, successor agency for three (3) of the last five (5)>calendar*yearsKfor. which information is available."
..... ~ ¦¦y . ¦ ;.
As set forth in the Act ai blighted area is: u'u™
"any improved, or vacant area}within the boundaries of^
located within the territorial limits ofthe municipality where: * j-*?^
(2) If vacant, the sound growth of the^mdeyeloprhent^ areaJs^impaired^bya
: combination of two (2) or more of the following factors, each of which is (i)
^present^ithfthat presence documented, tq^^meanin^ful^e^nf: so that a
municipality may ¦rea^dnablyi^nq^ within the
intent of the Act and (ii) mas^a^ the vacant part of the
redevelopment project area to which it pertains:
Obsolete platting of .vacant land that results in parcels of limited or narrow size or configurations of parcels. of irregular size or shape that would be difficult to develop on a planned basis and in. a manner compatible with
« contemporary standards and requirements, or platting that failed to create ¦ rights-qfjway, for streets^ alleys, or that. crated inadequate right-of-way' ¦wtiihssforsireets, -aiieys^qr^ptherfpublic rights-of-way of^that omitted easement for public utilities.
Diversity of ownership of parcels of vacant land sufficient in number to retard or impede the ability to assemble the land for development.
Tax and special assessment delinquencies exist or the property has been the subject of tax sales under the Property fax Code within the last five (5)
years. ;. ,,v ¦ :. . f, r
Deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring areas adjacent to the vacant land: -
The area, has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United State Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) PG^VPLANNERS
At tachment Five, Page 9 114 Ernest JR. Sawyer Enterprises
City of Chicago
hazardous waste; hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks
required by State or federal Jaw, provided that the remediation costs
constitute: a: material impediment, to':thO- development. or redevelopment pi|jp
the redevelopmentprojecUarp^A; p.f. „:j.wk% ^djifc'i
Thyjotal equalized assess^ area~rias;dOc!ined for three (3) oTiheJa0>five;(5):6^ year in which, the redevelopment project area is designated or isjncregsing': at>arfannual rate that ISiless'jhanJhe balance of thefrnuhicipalitylfor^thieer^: (3) 'of:thejast five (5) caleridar^pafsjfprywhich informationthe year in which the redevelopment project area is desighjated^ j v^.^t-->
(3) ilf Vacant, the sound growth ofthe redevelopment project area is impaired by one - of the following factors that (i) is present, with that presence documented, to a meaningful-extentso that a municipality may reasonably find, that the factor is-clearly present .within the intent of the Act and (ii) is reasonably distributed ; throughout the vacant part ofthe redevelopment project area to which it pertains:;
The area consists of one or more unused quarries, mines, or strip mine
ponds. "'""* #KS -' ¦ ¦ ¦ , ¦>,
The area consists of unused rail yards; rail tracks, or railroad rights-of-way.
The area, prior to its designation, is subject to chronic flooding that adversely¦ impactsS>ri;real property in the ar0a;as^ertified;^ professional engineer or appropriate regulatory agency. ;
The:area consist sof/an unused or illegardisposal sitestontairiing, earth, stone, building debris, or similar Ztiateri^Mia\ were? removed front construction, ¦. demolition, excavation, or dredge sites.
Prior to the effective date Of this amendatory Act of the 91st General; Assembly, the area is not less than 50 nor more than 100 acres and. 75% of ¦which, -f/s •'yadant-- (notwithstanding ihaiythe^ a&awhaMbeeh^oserf^.f!^;,...;;-^ [commercial agricultural purposes .withiri0yerA(5);' years -priors, to the^.-i designation of the redevelopment project area), and the area meets at least one (1) ofthe factors itemized in paragraph (1) ofthis subsection, the area has been designated as a town or village, center byr.;:ordinance or comprehensive plan adopted prior to January"-1-, 4982,i: and: the^ area has
not been developed for that designated purpose. ;. ;....y
The-area qualified as a blighted improved area immediately prior to becoming vacant, unless there has been substantial private investment in the immediately surrounding area."
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment Five, Page 10
PG^Vplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and, Project Amendment No. 2,
-^Survey, Analysis and Distribution of Eligibility «^ ^
A parcel-by^parcej analysis4ofvt|Vefcp^
eligibility-factors: * The condition'- ofiieach parcelMi^rstructure, in IheJ Project Area was-documerited using a tablet computer?^|H^!S: softv^ire^Field survey data'was compiledVand analyzed to investigate the presence and distribution of each of the TIF eligibility factors.
¦ Lsl ¦Y'" -„:::i:i>-";-3 ^-::;.j' is^JV — -¦¦¦'<>¦ " . Jlv'. / i.; :
Eligibility factor .data/wascoll^cfed forJjn'd 13 sub-areas for
analysis andT presentatipmynlftwo ^ablep?#able;."3|1W—' Consle'ivatipn^jr-aictors Matrix for
Improved Land^andpable 3-2 - Blighting Factors Matrix for Vacant Land. The conditions
recorded in these^^bstare.depicted graphicallyirifthe PlanfAppendix, Attachment Two,
Exhibits G1 through G6 ^ExistingVQpndtt^ the Existing
Conditions'\Maps: proyidejhe Project Area'divideijiHhtp^3^sections; and shown on six maps).
The improved portion of the Project Area contains 598 structures on 647 parcels and constitutes
68% offthe land^felf The" improved portions of thejPrpjectfArea areicharacterized'by the
foiiowihg-conditiphs!^ "' ' iv
>* the predominance of buildings that are 35 years of age or older (94% of buildings)1;
.deteriorated,buildingsE'(65% of:bu^
: : - deteriorated site ;impr6v'ements; (36% of parcels); ' \.,. : r^%:mfu
deteriorated street and/or sidewalk pavement (92% of sub-areas); ¦ obsolete buildings (3% of buildings);
•l'jprimary buildings wit^ , y.y-l ¦¦
excessive land coverage (66% of improved.parcels); . ^cmC.-..j
inadequate utilities (10ti%'Pf subrareas); ,. "
deleterious land use or layout (31% of sub-areas); and, f demonstrates declining and subpar EAV growth (meets all thresholds).
' ;¦ • ' " . ' ' -
The vacant portion of the Project Area constitutes 3.5 acres (1.1% of land^area), located on 22
parcels for this Eligibility Study. Although a very small portion of the Project Area, this vacant
land is characterized by the following statutory qualifying factors for a "blighted area" under
Section 5/11-74.4-3(b) of the Act: '^.^r^^pf*;-^ ¦
• deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring areas (100% of ¦u vacant parcels); and, \ in**.,, vf- ::P^;~ : ' :'::"'rSy,'::
demonstrates declining or subpar EAV growth (meets all thresholds).
Evaluation Procedure tw-
The Consultant conducted exterior surveys of observable conditions on all properties, buildings, and public and private improvements located in the Project Area. The Consultant's inspectors have been trained in TIF survey techniques and have extensive experience in similar undertakings. The surveys examined not only the condition and use of buildings, but also included surveys of streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, lighting, vacant land, underutilized land, parking facilities, landscaping, fences and walls, and general maintenance. Additionally, an analysis was conducted on existing site coverage, parking and land uses, and their relationship
1 This is 44% greater than the statutory requirement. Under the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, for designation of an area as a Conservation Area, 50% or more of the buildings must bo 35 years of age or older.
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) PG^VpLANNERS
Attachment Five, Page 11 116 Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Central TIF,Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2 _
to the surrounding area. The boundary and qualification of the Project Area was determined by the field investigations, eligibility requirements described in the Act, and the needs and deficiencies of the.overall Belmontj^ntral RedevelopmentiRroject Area;y p s;;
D. Investigation and Analysis of Factors
In determining whether or not the Project Area meets the eligibility requirerne Act. various methods of research were used in addition to the field surveys, Data was assembled from methods and sources including:™
1. Contacts .with local individuals knowledgeable as to the Project Area conditions,
structures, .history, site improvements, methods of. construction, real estate records
and rejated"items,- and -other information-related^ |n
addi^oh- jierial photographs," Sidwell=;blpc^
permitting data, etc. were also. used. ^TuW ' t**v< ¦-'
t i yj * " ¦! -:
. .¦ E|U -: >M=1E.:. v":T;3r y::SP;'V:?;.: r--- . ,
Inspection and research as to the condition of local buildings, streets, utilities, etc.,
including interior inspection ofthe Chopin Park Fieldhouse. r - %;On-site field inspection ^ of the Project Area conditions by experienced property
inspectors of the Consultant and others as previously noted. Personnel of the
.:GpjsUltaht- are drained 'H'h^tecHniq'ues and prqeedures ofvdeterminir^i:sicp^itipns of;
properties, utilities, streets, etc. and determination of eligibility of areas for tax
incrementfinancing. ;y:'':f!'^Mh%r^-^ ' '»¦-
Use of accepted definitions as provided for in the Act. ?
Adherence to findings of need as established by the Illinois General Assembly in establishing tax increment financing which became effective on January 10, 1977.
;thesie;!re:?fl ¦ ;¦
i . :' ¦. ' - *
L There exists in many Illinois municipalities, areas that are conservation) or j., blighted areas, within the meaning of the TIF statute. k
The, eradication of blighted areas and the treatment of conservation areas by :.redevelopment projects are essential to the public interest.
These findings are made on the basis that the presence of blight ,
or conditions which lead to blight, is detrimental to the safety, health, welfare and morals of the public.
PCAVplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Ceiitral TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2
Table 3-1 - Conservation Factors Matrix for Improved Land, below, summarizes the existing
conditions in the Project Area. ^; ,;- ^
is
a
I
<5
UJ
2. £
O [ o
d 6: 6 Z ; Z; z
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) Attachment Five, Page 13
PG^Vplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Central:TIF Redevelopment Plan,and Project -' j s - ¦ ~
Amendment No. 2 _ City of Chicago
E. Eligibility Factors^ Improved Area '
In making the determination of eligibility, each and every property or building iri; the Project Area, is not required to be blighted or otherwise qualify. It is the Prqject^rea;as:a;v^ple that must be ; 'determined to be eligible. The report stated below details conditions that cause the improved portion of the Project Area to qualify as a conservation area under the Act and as per surveys and research undertaken by the Consultant {o^TOyAV'^^f^,- . :...-«¦¦ . -i;
Age of Structures :jMi'-:.~ ";.:¦
s JL^gi^althqugh^no^one of the 13 factors used to establish;a conservatipn.area under the , Act Is used as a threshold that an area must meet in order to qualify^-
1 Age presumes the existence of problems or limiting conditions resulting from normal and cdntinubds use of structures and exposure to the elements over a period of many years, it *«$isa|nj|e^ blderBuildihgs typically/exhjbit more probjemsitt^ in; ?s^^later;years: becaus'ejbf longer periods'oTactive usag^^ impactbf ,- \\ifie- . temperature^and^oisture^A
for meeting modern-day space and development standards. These typical problematic
conditions in older buildings can be the initial indicators that the factors used to qualify
¦ maybepresent:*-'1-5* :;'- ;- ¦">**."
¦ -0^ '¦'•-j ¦ ¦ ,... 0:L,c ¦. .
Summary of Findings Regarding Age: ,
¦ ;¦<¦¦-.-¦¦¦¦ -. '¦ . '-'¦¦¦ 1 -^^.-;.'-'- ". ./i;< . ¦¦ -wj<*.
'.t-M There are 598 buildings inithe Project ;ArB0includin as-
garages and accessory buildings). OfithesOjbuM^ of age\pr
older as determined by field surveys and local research, in many instances, buildings
"¦''¦f--;are significantly older than 35 years of age. The Project Area meets the threshold
.../ requirement for a conservation area in that more than 50% of the structures exceed 35
years of age. :•.'.-. ' ¦
Dilapidation
Dilapidation as a factor is based upon the documented presence and reasonable distribution of buildings in an advanced state of disrepair. In order for a building to be classified as dilapidated, as the term is defined in the Act, major defects to the primary structural components, such as leaning or bowing load-bearing walls,,severely sagging roofs, damaged floor structures, or foundations exhibiting major cracks or displacement, of the building must be evident, or evident structural defects must be so extensive that -;¦ ¦ the buildings must be removed. : ;;V> •. f--*^»'l?x.:r -:M;-: -y^.l
Summary of Findings Regarding Dilapidation:
Although several of the 598 buildings in the Project Area show evidence of disrepair, no structures were found to exhibit major critical defects to primary structural components.
Obsolescence
An obsolete building or improvement is one which no longer serves its intended use. The Act defines obsolescence as "the condition or process of falling into disuse. Structures have become ill-suited for the original use." Obsolescence, as-a factor, is
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment Five, Page 14
PQAVplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
City of Chicago
based upon the documented presence and reasonable distribution of buildings and other ;site improvements^evidencing such obsolescence. Examples include:'.
a. " Functional' Obsolescence: Structures are typically, built'for specific uses or .
"•" purposes,-and their design, location, height and space arrangement/are each
'..intended ''for a specific occupancy at a given time.; BuHdings are obsolete whien ¦<¦
they contain characteristics or deficiencies that limit the use and marketability of such- buildings; The; characteristics may include , loss in value to a property resulting from an inherent deficiency existing from poor design or layout, ) improper orientation of the building on site, etc:; which detracts from the overall ; - - :*F^usefulhess «br desirability of a property. Obsolescence in;such buildings is typically difficult and expensive to correct. :
Economic Obsolescence: Economic obsolescence is normally a result of adverse conditions that cause some degree of market rejection, and hence, depreciation in market values. Typically, buildingssclassified asidilapidated and buildings that contain vacant space are characterized by problem conditions,
;¦¦'¦¦¦/ which may not be economically curable, resulting in net rental losses and/or depreciation in market value. I
Obsolete site improvements: Site improvements, including sewer and water lines, public utility lines (gas, electric and telephone), roadways, parking areas,
; parking structures, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighting, etc., may also evidence obsolescence in terms of their relationship to contemporary development ~ r standards for such improvements. Factbrs*ofi;thiS:.obsolescence may include "-;- - :¦ inadequate utility capacities, outdated designs, etc.*^-^ i;: :;; vy» w^gy,fy:
There are a few buildings in the Project Area that have a size, layout, or construction type that are*, indicative of ;• obsolescence. Vacant storefronts^ vacant, ;;upper)stories,-underutilized properties, undersized commercial^;buildings, jack of parking-or:loadirig space, deteriorated buildings, and inadequate site improvements are all found in the Project Area and are indicators of obsolescence! j Some structures :are:clearly-nqw:used for purposes other than the building's designed and original use.
¦ Summary of Findings Regarding Obsolescence: 'm, k( % \>
/¦'The:"Tieibvsuryey of buildings in the Project Area found that certain buildings exhibit
characteristics^of obsolescence. Obsolete buildings comprised approximately 3% or 17
of the 598 buildings in the Project Area: Although this percentage is very low, the City of
Chicago Department of Planning and Development providea[ electronic\:data-pn building
permits for the Project Area by address. A review of these records revealed that only
one permit for new construction has been issued)in the Project Area between 2010 and
2014, indicating that many buildings in the Project Area may be in danger of becoming
obsolete. ¦ , f-,
Examples of existing obsolete buildings in the Project Area include:
An obsolete filling station used as storage at 5800 W. Diversey Avenue.
A mobile home converted into a restaurant at 5940 W. Diversey Avenue.
» Long-term vacancies may be an indication of economic obsolescence, such as 5026, 5211, and 5247 W. Diversey Avenue.
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) Attachment Five, Page 15
PGAVplanners
Ernest K. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and ^Project" r;i7? Amendment No. 2 ~ City of Chicago
¦•- Residential buildings that have been converted to another use or that house: more
' - " dwelling unitsi th an originally -:: ,
Obsolete site improvements' also exist iri the1 Project Area and are generally associated iv///? the commercial buildings. Examplesiqfi^
include poor sidewalk conditions and deteriorated fencing. ^y
Deterioration
Deterioration refers tcrphysical deficiericies=or disrepair in;bu|ldings or site improvements requiring.; treatment or repair: Conditions that are not easily, correctable ih'the'^ursi|:o'f normal maintenance^were^classifled as>
as deteriorating or in an advanced stage of deterioration, depending upon the degree or
extent of the defects.* Buildings with major defects in -.the: secondaiyKbuildmg
components (e.g., damaged doors and door frames, broken;windows, window frames
and muntins, dented or damaged metal,siding, gutters and downspouts damaged or
missing, weathered; fascia materials, cracks in masonry' walls, spalling. masonry
surfaeesfetc;) were observed in the Project-Area. Additionally, roadways, off-street
" parking and surface::st6fage! areas alsofdernonstrated deterioration such as3crackihg on
paved surfaces, potholes, depressions, loose paving materials, weeds protruding
through the surface, etc. s* -
Summary of Findings Regarding Deterioration: ;sm^y.
'' "¦ . ... ¦',", :;- -;;-«**s" '
Throughout the Project Area? deteriorating were recorded on 388 (65%) ofthe
598; buildings. The field survey of buildings in the Project Area found major defects in secondary building components, including(windows^doo {siding, fascia materials, parapet walls, etc. 234 (36%) of the improved parcels in thie Project Area demonstrated deteriorated site improvements. Deteriorated public improvements (street pavement, curb and gutter, and sidewalk) were observed on 12 (92%) ofthe 13 sub-areas in the Project Area.
¦ ¦ :; -i ¦¦ ... . ... ¦ ^
Specific examples of deterioration in the Project Area include:.
The parking garage for Community First Medical Center (formerly Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center) at Addison Street and Central Avenue.
Sidewalks at 5646 W. Addison Street.
The Chopin Park Fieldhouse at 3420 N. Long Avenue.
Parking lots at 6121 - 6137 W. Diversey Avenue.
A light post with exposed wiring around 5137-5141 W. Diversey Avenue.
6115 W. Fullerton Street includes 4 buildings that all require some amount of tuck-pointing and awhihg^epairT'^ ;
Deteriorated window on the rear of .5858 W. Fullerton Avenue.
Deteriorated street pavement along the 2400 Block of Monitor Avenue.
Presence of Structures Below Minimum Code Standards
Structures below minimum code standards include all structures that do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, State building laws and regulations. The principal purposes of such codes are to require buildings to be constructed in such a way as to sustain safety of loads expected from various types of occupancy, to be safe for
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment. Five. Page 1(5
PGQVplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
City of Chicago
occupancy against fire and similar hazards, and/or to establish minimum standards essential. *for r.safe«an'd-.- sahitary^habjtatipn. ^StweJ^res^below^ are characterized by defects or deficiencies that presume to threaten health and safety.
Summary of Findings Regarding Presence of Structures Below Minimum Code
Standards: ?$!;¦¦ -c^k:--. -^
Considering the age of buildings in the Project Area, it is likely that many of the buildings are ibjtfowjjhe mtn^ium coBey"standards currently jmforce by the City of Chicago, t'iHdwerv%tfffhlio^0'toisubstMMjfelthese. conditions -bothiinterior and exterior inspections |- yibMhe ptpperjies^
s an evaluation, ¦iHe;'C^'^0nTr^jied onCitydat&on
. City of Chicago Dep^Hmeht-pfPlanning and Development provided el^tronicSdata On f::mainienanceyinsp^ipns documented fYw ¦Z ^'system: between 201$ and:j20l4. Failed code^:ih0ectioris:'were .repprded§ for•¦ five ^ separate addresses for buildings in the Project Area. However, because the data are based on property address rather than PIN, code violation data is not presented at the ¦ •,. -^sub-area fleyehin-*-Table}j3- - ffrpgnseiyap^ It >;/: ¦ should also be reedgnizpd that the code violaiibhs(documented, through the C'^
system are only'afraction of ihe> unreported code deficiencies in the Project Area. The predominance of structures tip excess of 60 years of age indicates that most of the buildings in the Project Area likely have some characteristics that do notmpet the City's current building or zoning requirements. • However, due to this unsubstantiated data, this factor cannot be verified as present for this Eligibility Study.
Illegal Use of Individual Structures ¦ .<-.
this factor applies to the use of structures in violation of applicable, national, State or local laws. Examples of illegal uses may include, but not be limited to, the following:
¦=a. illegal home occupations;
' b. conduct of any illegal vice activities such as gambling or drug manufacture; .;,:>•$••
c. " uses not ih conformant codes and not previously grand
fathered in as legal nonconforming uses;
d. uses involving manufacture, sale, storage or use of dangerous explosives
and firearms. ¦ ¦¦y -'-' VR-.-- . lf;.
Summary of Findings Regarding Illegal Use of Individual Structures:
This factor was not documented in the Project Area.
Excessive Vacancies
Establishing the presence of this factor requires documenting unoccupied or underutilized buildings that represent an adverse influence on the Project Area because of the frequency, extent, or duration of such vacancies. It includes properties which
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
At tachment Five, Page 1.7
PGGYplanmers
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
'.Bclmont/Centrat TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project i : ;-
Amendment No. 2 City of Chicago
evidence no apparent effort directed toward /occupancy or utilization: .and partial
vacancies. ¦' - ' \ ,p <>%' ;
Summary of Findings Regarding , ^ „,
: ." ' ' ' - P^ f' ¦ ' ¦ j- .. . ......
During the field investigation ofthe Project Area a tqfai of51 (12%) primary buildings
were observed to contain vacant floor space. Based on the condition of some of the
vacant buildingsMi(bq'arded-up or broken-out winfo of
lighting, outdafed'tsignage, etc.) it is evident that some of these
been vacant for an^ of time: The'^appearance .ofvtt
, the, ProjectyAr^ a. W~ ^tendencyrof vacancies to spread quickly throughout the Project Area. ' '{m^,, ^ :, j!^
The residential and commercial vacancies are generally distributed throughout the i~-**--Project Area.; However, the distribuiidnffarti^quantity of vacancies;:js j not gehSraily resulting in a significant,blighting effect on surrounding properties. ~f 1
¦ siiydiack of Ventilation, Light or Sanitary Facilities
E?;> ^« Many older structures faiOto provide adequate ventilation, light or sanitary facilities. This, . * is also a characteristic-often: found in illegal on improper, building conversions and'in ?is /commercial buildings?converted to residents
H£< ji.ifacilities are presumedr to= adversely; ;affect sthe - health; iOf; building occupants/1 (i.e.,
¦3 fy'^ j;residents, employees or visitors). • . ' . ¦
™ Summary of Findings Regarding Lack of Ventilation, Light or Sanitary Facilities:
The exterior field survey of main buildings. in the Project Area did 'not Jesuit in
documentation1 of structures without adequate mechanical ventilation, naturafjight and;
proper window area ratios. 5* - ^f ^ -f^-.
8. Inadequate Utilities ^-\...
¦ Inadequate utilities refers to deficiencies in the capacity or condition of utilities which, service a property or area, including, but not limited to, storm water drainage, water supply, electrical power, sanitary sewers, gas and electricity.
: ¦ ""^ ''- ^: ' ¦¦.*/ /;*!::¦¦¦:: '^ . . , ^
Summary of Findings Regarding Inadequate Utilities:
The Bureau of Engineering Services in the City's Department of Water Management provided the Consultant with data on the condition of sanitary sewer mains and water lines in the Project Area. Many of the water and,sewer mains serving the Project Area are deficient in terms of either age or size.
According to the City's Bureau of Engineering Services, all 6-inch cast iron water mains are obsolete and in need of replacement with ductile iron mains of at least eight (8) inches in diameter. The projected service life of ductile iron water mains as well as sewer lines is approximately 100 years. For sewer lines, conditions may exist that severely decrease their service life, perhaps as much as half. However, it is possible to re-line sewer pipes of sufficient diameter to extend service life (a less costly alternative
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) PG^VPLANNERS
Attachment Five, Page 18 Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
123
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plah aiid Project C " ^ ^; : J,f!
Amendment No. 2 City of/Chicago y
to replacement). Regardless of methods used to extend service life, water and sewer ihes may, be judged to be inadequate a fter 90% of their service life has expired.
'Water lineyand sanitary sewer line'- ¦dataswas^reyjewedi^by^the':'Consultant'. While
undersizedwater lines are found?in only 1 of.the Project Area's; sub-areas, water lines
. • - over 90 years old are found in all 13 (100%) of the sub-areast- Additionally, all 13
(100%) of the sub areas have sections of sewer line that exceed 90 years of age. The
I . City does have plans to reline some of these facilities, but most are not planned for
improvement at this time. " ,
These obsolete, undersized, and/or otherwise inadequate utilities are indicated in the Plan Appendix, Attachment Two, Exhibits G1mthrpugh&G6 - Existing Condition Maps. , „
.9;?B.Excessiveikand Coverage and Overcrowding of Structures' and Community
-Flpities' *" 4- ¦ v* ¦ ' -V.jyifl?i'V ¦ v -s^...
This factor may be documented by showing instances where building coverage is , excessive: Excessive coverage refers5-to 3the° over-intensive use of property and the Crowding of rbuildings and accessory 'facilities^6nto4a'isite.;: Problem conditions, include buildings either improperly situated ;on the 'p&rcelbff located on parcels of inadequate size and/or .shape in relation to present-day standards, bfideyelopment for health and safety;*and multiple buildings on a single parcel.1 Thelresulting inadequate conditions include such' factors as insufficient provision;fbr-'iligHtSa^ due to close proximity to nearby buildings, lack of adequate or proper access to a public ' right-of-way, lack of required off-street parkihgifandjiriadequate>provision*for-loading or service. Excessive land coverage has an adverse. or blighting effect on nearby development because problems associated with lack of parking or loading areas can negatively impact adjoining properties.
Summary of Findings Regarding Excessive Land Coverage and Overcrowding of Structures and Community Facilities:
Structures exhibiting 100% lot coverab^^^jbj^b/f/ire walls separating one structure from the next is a historical fact of high-density urban development. This situation is common throughout the commercial corridors in the Project Area: Additionally, many intensive commercial uses are located in close proximity to multi-family complexes, resulting in the uses competing over parking. The incidence of excessive land coverage in the Project Area is high as a result of both inadequate spacing between buildings and inadequate parking.
Numerous commercial businesses are located in structures, some that are mixed-use with upper-floor residences, which cover 100%, of their respective lots. Other businesses are utilizing 100% Of their lots for business operations. Many multi-family complexes have limited off-street parking lots, if they have parking space at all. Additionally, some residences that were originally built as single family homes have been converted into multi-unit residences. These, conditions may not allow for off-street shipping and loading facilities or may not provide parking for patrons, building residents, or employees. This has prompted overflow parking and truck traffic associated with normal business operations to utilize the surrounding residential areas, both within and outside of the Project Area, for parking and access. Additionally, there are several lots
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment Five, Page 19
PGGYpLANNERS
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and'Project Amendment No. 2
being used to pork a number of vehicles. Some examples of structures exhibiting
z excessive land coverage include: '. ' ¦;".'. • ," m~W.
IV. Diversey Avenue has several locations (5257, 6148) where vacant lots or off-street parking lots contain nothing but debris and vehicles, some abandoned.
6137 W. Diversey Avenue is a building with three housing units,'one in a garage.
• Severaltjjarge vehicle'wo in a deteriorated' 'parking' ldtatB023 W:
, DiyefseyMv&nue. ¦"'"'¦ - '*''"¦"¦ i:; 'M'::: ¦; ¦¦':- : f!: -; ¦. S-^
SV Vehicles park On the sidewalk for an automotive shop at 4911 W. Diversey Avenue.
At 5037 W. Diversey Avenue, single-family housing fronts onto, a deteriorated
comme'roiaipaWh^%k i...!.^%a^: " rA\.-j. /¦
" 5256 W. Diversey, Avenue is pvercrowded^ith yehic^sj^pjfie that (encroachyon a
nearby sidewalk. ¦¦->¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
Several vehicles, some abandoned, are:parked af:^
Of the 670 improved parcels in the Project area, 428 (66%) revealed some evidence of excessive M^lcpverage or overcrowding of structures and community facilities.
10. Deleterious Land Use or Layout .
;L^-*^Deleterious viand instances /of/incompatible ^land-use^rejatioriships^
buildings occupied by inappropriate mixed uses, or uses, which may be considered noxious, offensive or environmentally unsuitable
Summary of Findings Regarding Deleterious Land Use or Layout:
In locations such as the Project' Arealwhere>: its character has evolve'd
industrial, commercial and residential uses are often in close-proximity tbone^anqtlieh It
s"' is not unusual " to' find:^^ s^ buildings-, within a;
predominantly commercial or industrial area or a commercial or industrial Use in a residential area. In urban centers, commercial buildings were typically designed'so sftop; owners could live above their stores. A dense urban environment often leads to a relaxation of parking requirements due to such,-live-work, situations and the availability of public transit. Although these buildings may be considered, because of age and continuous occupancy, as legal non-conforming uses (whose existence and use is "'¦' thereby "grandfathered"), they are ^nonetheless
predominWtoharacter of the Project Area is influenced by these differing uses. There may also be instances of incompatible commercial uses that impact residential uses. As noted under the findings for excessive land coverage, the combination of limited on-site parking and high density comrhercial development in close proximity to residential uses can cause conflict regarding parking availability, and traffic, safety, and environmental conditions. These situations have promoted some instances of deleterious use of land in some portions of the-Project Area.
As noted, the Project Area consists primarily of commercial corridors with mixed-use areas bordering dense residential neighborhoods. There are few industrial uses, but there are some large and intense commercial areas that adjoin residences. One such example is the single-family residential use located at 5658 W. Eddy Street on the Community First Medical Center (formerly Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center) site. Another example this factor is the location of a large billboard near mixed-use residences at 5849 Fullerton Avenue.
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015) PG^VpLANNERS
Attachment Five, Page 20 Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises
125
Belmont/Central TIF Redevelopment Plan and Project J .:i"Si!^i-"/. ¦ -li-ME-ir--
Amendmcnt No. 2 _ ' City of Chicago
{'"Tour (3 %%)' of the:. ^fsul>^reasswete, found-t6-;have residential uses in close proximity to intense commercial uses that may lead to conflicts or incompatible land uses in the Project'Area and me evidence of Deleterious Land Use or Layout.
11.iLack ofCommunity Planning
This may be counted as a factor if the proposed area was developed prior to, or without the benefit or guidance of, a community plan ? This means dhat no community plan existed, was considered -inadequate, and/or. was virtually ignored during the time of the :, area's'developmenfojndications^f-a lack oftcommunity planning include:r/
ft?
,^1'; S^r^^-4;a|le^ys, ;ahd; intersections that are too narrow ; or awkwardly,
: ' confltfu?^ movements?."* v " '
Inadequate street and utility layout. -. ->3^m. ^: ./ .-"*
TrJIfp^lf»land^fftat^fe; "tbo:' sma 11 or - havelawkwa rd; ¦ cdnfig u rations 'that woUld hot meetco'Se'mpbraiy development
A-...- Properties lack adequate access to public streets. ^
fr^:-w^S*f^f^s. Industrial land"use?'and zoning: jacljacent "to }dr^w1thih/heavily|devel6ped^
$8$ Presidential areas without ample buffer areas. ;\; . ^-'Jlr •
Commercial and industrial properties that are too small in area to , adequaM^
Tequjfements.
¦"" :.':'.y - ¦" :: .¦:.'¦'. ::':^%,:>-. ¦¦. '".'... -wv^Wi:
The ^presehcei, of JdeterioralBd structures, code violations and other physical conditions that are further evidence of an absence of effective
:; ¦ cormW^ify/(D^hhihg.s^i-¦ ¦. ,..¦¦?¦/¦ .
Summary of Findings Regarding Lack of Community Planning:
•; Much of the Project Area was developed originally from the early to mid-1900's. As
evidenced by limited'flots sizes:;.for commercial -uses, ¦ placement and orientation, of
buildings with tofaifonhea^ and lack of provisions for offrstreet parking;
loading and semce/iffte ^ of the area occurred without consideration of a
comprehensive community plan with adequate guidelines for the overall community area development. ^ f#? ;; :r ' . y: .„ ¦:¦
As previously noted in this analysis, many properties in the Project Area are affected by lack of parking that has led to excessive land coverage and deleterious land use or layout factors. The majority of the, property within the Project Area developed at a time when on-site parking was not a priority. Patrons of commercial businesses often walked to their destination from adjacent neighborhoods or used public transit. This situation, while still in existence, often conflicts with, contemporary use of the automobile and the increase of patrons using shopping alternatives outside of their local, shopping, area. ¦ Large commercial users will typically provide on-site parking, but parking and loading activity may still impact nearby residences. Additionally, there is evidence of deteriorating building conditions and records of several code violations.
Added Area Eligibility Study (March 2015)
Attachment. Five, Page 21
POAVplanners
Ernest R. Sawyer Enterprises