2016 APR 20 AM |0:1,3
April 15,2016
To the Mayor, Members of the City Council Committee on Public Safety, the City Clerk, the Legislative Reference Bureau, and the citizens of Chicago:
Enclosed is the public report on the operations of the Independent Police Review Authority (IPRA) for the First Quarter of 2016 that is submitted herein pursuant to Municipal Code of Chicago, Section 2-57-110.
I am happy to report that, during the first quarter of 2016, we have made significant progress against many of the short-term objectives we established under our new administration:
Enhancing legal oversight of IPRA investigations
During this quarter, we have hired two additional attorneys and a new General Counsel. Recruiting is also well underway for a new Supervising Staff Attorney. We believe that having this enhanced legal staffing in place will improve not only the quality but also the timeliness of our investigations and we look forward to seeing the impact of their work during Second Quarter 2016.
Building in-house policy expertise
We have also hired a Policy and Legislative Affairs Analyst who has hit the ground running in terms of advising the IPRA management team on a myriad of policy issues related to IPRA's responsibilities as well as policies regarding policing strategies that are relevant to IPRA's jurisdiction.
Enhancing communication and coordination with our law enforcement and prosecutorial partners
During this quarter, we have engaged in regular and productive communication and coordination with the FBI and the Cook County State's Attorney's office. We believe this degree of collaboration will also have a positive impact on the quality and timeliness of our investigative process.
Enacting identifiable quality control measures for our investigative processes
This quarter, we implemented several initiatives that are geared toward improving the quality of our work. First, we introduced a new, more robust performance evaluation system for all IPRA employees. The goal of the system is to create a shared understanding of the expected behaviors, contributions and conduct in a way that reinforces our core values of Integrity, Transparency, Independence, and Timeliness. In addition, we believe this system will more effectively hold
1615 WEST CHICAGO AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60622 312.746.3594 (COMPLAINT LINE) | 312.746.3609 (MAIN LINE) | 312.745.3593 (TTY) | WWW.IPRACHICAGO.ORG
I
I
I
IPRA
INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
—* ^ * *
INTEGRITY • TRANSPARENCY • INDEPENDENT • TIMELINESS
our investigative staff members accountable for the quality and timeliness of their work. We have also implemented a new case review procedure that provides for a review of all investigations at a higher level within the organization. Lastly, we have provided our investigative staff with case management procedures and tools that will reinforce both quality and timeliness.
Achieving greater transparency through increased and more effective public interface
This quarter we have also devoted significant time and effort to transparency. First, we have made improvements to our website by adding more commentary and a set of frequently asked questions. We are also attempting to make our quarterly reports more informative by providing more information that is relevant to the issues of concern to the community. To that end, we would appreciate feedback on this report.
Also, as Chief Administrator, I have taken it upon myself to more proactively engage with the community about the important police accountability issues that are under vigorous debate throughout the city.
As you know, this report is being issued just days following the report of the Mayor's Police Accountability Task Force which recommended important new reforms, including that our agency be replaced by a new entity responsible for police oversight. Because this is a serious and important undertaking, I anticipate that there will be substantial debate about this and other recommended reforms. I am encouraged by the degree to which our community has engaged in these issues and by the real commitment to change I sense among all the involved stakeholders. I am also gratified that the Task Force has shed light on several important issues that we at IPRA had already identified as impediments to our independence and effectiveness. Addressing these issues will be essential to achieving effective police oversight going forward and I will lend my full support to seeing them to fruition.
1615 WEST CHICAGO AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60622 312.746.3594 (COMPLAINT LINE) | 312.746.3609 (MAIN LINE) | 312.745.3593 (TTY) | WWW.IPRACHICAGO.ORG
It has been an honor and a privilege to be in a position to initiate reforms at IPRA that can be carried forward into the future. I also want to express my continued personal commitment to public safety and police accountability in Chicago in whatever way I am asked to serve.
2016 APR 20 AH 10= "U3
City of Chicago Independent Police Review Authority
IPRA
INDEPENDENT POLICE REVIEW AUTHORITY
^ -*r« *
INTEGRITY • TRANSPARENCY • INDEPENDENCE ¦ TIMELINESS
Quarterly Report
January 1, 2016 - March 31, 2016
This report is filed pursuant to Municipal Code of Chicago, Section 2-57-110, which requires the filing of quarterly reports. This quarterly report provides information for the period January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016. The information contained in this report is accurate as of April 15, 2016. All public reports produced by the Independent Police Review Authority's (IPRA) are available online at www.iprachicago.org .
I. Overview of Open and Closed Investigations
For the first quarter of 2016, IPRA received 1,171 misconduct complaints and incident notifications, 891 of which were referred to the Internal Affairs Division (IAD) of the Chicago Police Department (CPD) and 280 of which were retained by IPRA for investigation.
Category Ql2016 Q4 2015
Domestic Violence 25 16
Excessive Force 78 103
Bias-Based Verbal Abuse 21 15
Unnecessary Display of Weapon 11 11
Unnecessary Physical Contact 15 15
Miscellaneous1 22 33
Civil Suits2 9 10
Notification Type Ql2016 Q4 2015
Firearm Discharge Striking an Individual|999|
Other Weapon Discharge Notification (No Hit Shootings, Animal Destruction, Taser, OC Spray) 95 114
Total 280 323
|109|Miscellaneous includes the following categories: miscellaneous, blank category codes, shooting notifications that have been converted to complaints, coercion, and failure to provide proper care allegations.|109|Pursuant to MCC 2-57-040(e), IPRA is authorized to review all cases settled by the Department of Law where a complaint register was filed against a department member, and if, in the opinion of the Chief Administrator, further investigation is warranted, conduct such investigation.
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report 2
Of the 280 matters that fell within IPRA's jurisdiction, the agency referred 6 to the Cook County State's Attorney Office (CCSAO), which may decide to conduct a concurrent criminal investigation. During the first quarter of this year, the agency closed 115 investigations. This represents a decline of 62.6% from the fourth quarter of 2015. However, this decline is largely attributable to the introduction by the new administration of new policies and procedures for investigations and the implementation of new quality control measures, including new case management and case review procedures. As these measures are adopted,'we fully anticipate that our closure rate will increase.
Of the 115 investigations closed this quarter, the recommendations made by the agency include the following:
:- ^i&202S
Sustained3|99|3.48%|99|2.12% 12 3.23%
Not Sustained4 10 8.70% 31 8.20% 51 13.71%
Unfounded5 10 8.70% 35 9.26% 49 13.17%
Exonerated6|99|1.74%|99|0.53%|99|1.88%
No Affidavit 15 13.04% 82 21.69% 90 24.19%
Administratively Closed 74 64.35% 220 58.20% 163 43.82%
Totals 115 100.00% 378 100.00% 372 100.00%
|109|Sustained: The allegation was supported by sufficient evidence to justify disciplinary action. Recommendations of disciplinary action may range from violation noted to separation from the CPD.|109|Not Sustained: The allegation is not supported by sufficient evidence, which could be used to prove or disprove the allegation.|109|Unfounded: The allegation was not based on the facts revealed through investigation, or the reported incident did not occur.|109|Exonerated: The incident occurred, but the action taken by the officer(s) was deemed lawful and proper.
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report 3
First Quarter Closed Case Findings
Unfounded
Nearly 13% of our investigations were closed this quarter as a result of not being able to obtain a sworn affidavit from the complainant, which is required under state law1 in order to continue an investigation. Administratively closed cases are those cases that are either closed because they are notifications with no allegation of misconduct or allegations that do not fall within IPRA's nor IAD's jurisdiction. For example, if a citizen made a complaint against someone and they were a member of a non-CPD agency, IPRA would administratively close that case.
At the close of first quarter 2016, IPRA had 764 pending investigations. The vast majority are investigations of allegations of excessive force. These investigations reflect a broad range of complexity. We also have 75 pending officer-involved shooting investigations involving an incident in which a member of the public was injured or killed. These are among the most complex investigations that IPRA undertakes.
As outlined above, our case closure rate dropped during this quarter as the agency was focused on implementing the new reforms. Because these reforms are intended to enhance both the quality and the timeliness of our investigations, we anticipate that once the reforms are fully in place, our closure rate will improve and we should expect to see more progress in reducing the number of pending cases at the end of any given quarter.
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
I
HM^^B^|pil|Fjf&i(gu3iser^
Category # %
Excessive Force / Use of Force 346 45%
Domestic Altercation or Incident 98 13%
Firearm Discharge that Strikes an Individual 75 10%
Verbal Abuse / Harassment 63 8%
Miscellaneous 49 7%
Taser, OC Spray Discharge 47 6%
Unnecessary Display of Weapon 38 5%
Civil Suits 25 3%
Failure to Provide Proper Gare 17 2%
Firearm Discharge - No Hit|99|**7
False Arrest|99|**
Total 764 100%
II. Officer - Involved Weapons Notifications and Data Trends
There were 4 officer-involved shooting incidents in which a non-department member was injured or killed during First Quarter 2016. This is down slightly from Fourth Quarter 2015, and on par with First Quarter 2015. In addition, we continue to see downward trends in incidents involving the discharge of a Taser and incidents involving injury or deaths in police custody.
Ql 2016 Weapon Notifications9
pffl Firearm discharge with Hit Firearm discharge with No Hit10 Firearm discharge at an Animal Taser Discharge Accidental Taser Discharge11 OC Spray Notifications
¦CteDuCX3?.v,...|999 9|76|999|
|109|** denotes percentages less than 1%.|109|IPRA is notified of an incident in multiple ways. IPRA only assigns one log number per incident, regardless of how many officers or weapons are involved. For example, if a shooting includes multiple officers, IPRA reports that as one shooting notification. If officers also used a taser in that incident, IPRA would report the highest use of force, which would be the shooting. IPRA investigates incidents in their totality and thus does not break out each weapon discharge per incident.
9As of this quarter, IPRA maintains an audit log of all published numbers, such that IPRA can substantiate its public reporting. To the extent possible, IPRA reports on accidental discharges. IPRA also compares its notifications with CPD Use of Force reporting to ensure that CPD has notified IPRA of all weapon discharge incidents. IPRA is also ensuring the quality of our front-end notification data and our case management data throughout the process, which will result in more accurate, complete public reporting and more effective trend analysis over time.
10 If an officer accidentally discharges a firearm that does not strike them or another individual, that discharge is not logged as a
notification to IPRA but as a complaint and is reflected in our total intake numbers, not the above weapon discharge numbers.
11 To the extent possible, IPRA will report on accidental taser discharges. Similarly to accidental firearm discharges, IPRA
receives complaints regarding accidental taser discharges that do not strike individuals. These numbers are also reflected in the
total intake.
Three-Year Data Trend Analysis of Shooting Notifications
Hit and No Hit Shooting Notifications
¦ Hit ¦ No Hit
Lines represent three year
average.
2015Q1 2015Q2 201503 2015Q4 2016Q1
Hit Shooting Notifications
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
The above graphic is a heat map based on the total number of complaints received in each district during the first quarter of 2016. The average is 47 complaints per district.
The Lighter Grey signifies those districts with a substantially lower number of complaints.
The Grey signifies those districts that are below average.
The Red signifies those districts that are above average.
The Dark Red signifies those districts with a substantially higher number of complaints.
12 See Appendix for additional complaint information per district.
13 District 000 signifies that the district of occurrence was unknown at the time of the complaint. Through the investigation,
IPRA will determine the district of occurrence.
I
I
I
The following chart depicts how many members received how many complaints per unit.
District 001 21 members with 1 complaint each District 010 13 members with 1 complaint each 1 member with 2 complaints District 020 7 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints each
District 002 19 members with 1 complaint each District 011 24 complaints with 1 complaint each 4 complaints with 2 complaints each District 02114 1 member with 1 complaint
District 003 24 members with 1 complaint each 4 members with 2 complaints each 1 member with 3 complaints District 012 7 members with 1 complaint each District 022 18 members with 1 complaint each
District 004 22 members with 1 complaint each 3 members with 2 complaints each District 014 12 members with 1 complaint each District 024 3 members with 1 complaint each
District 005 34 members with 1 complaint each 3 members with 2 complaints each District 015 23 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints each District 025 29 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints each
District 006 26 members with 1 complaint each 4 members with 2 complaints each 1 member with 5 complaints District 016 13 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints each District Reinstatement Unit - (045) 2 members with 1 complaint each
District 007 District 017 Airport Law Enforcement Unit -
19 members withl complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints each 6 members with 1 complaint each North (050) 6 members with 1 complaint each
District 008 District 018 Airport Law Enforcement Unit -
23 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints each 13 members with 1 complaint each 1 member with 2 complaints South (051) 2 members with 1 complaint each
District 009 20 members with 1 complaint each District 019 23 members with: 1 complaint each Detail Unit (057) 1 member with 1 complaint
Special Investigations Section (079) Research and Development Narcotics Section (189)
1 member with 1 complaint Division (127) 1 member with 1 complaint 37 members with 1 complaint each 5 members with 2 complaints each 5 members with 3 complaints each
Bureau of Administration (120) Chicago Alternative Policing Intelligence Section (191)
1 member with 1 complaint Strateev (CAPS) Division (135) 2 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 1 complaint each
" The 21st District was eliminated March 4, 2012. The complaint reflected above was initiated against a member assigned to this district at the time of the alleged misconduct.
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
I j
Finance Division (122) 1 member with 1 complaint Traffic Section (145) 4 members with 1 complaint each Gang Investigation Division (193) 17 members with 1 complaint each 1 member with 2 complaints
Human Resources Division (123) Special Functions Unit (153) Bureau of Patrol - Area Central
1 member with 1 complaint Gang Enforcement Division (393) 4 members with 1 complaint each 1 member with 1 complaint Maior Accident Investigation Unit (608) 1 member with 1 complaint (211) 12 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints
Deployment Operations Center Field Services Section (166) Bureau of Patrol - Area South (212)
(116) 3 members with 1 complaint each 3 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints each 12 members with 1 complaint each
Bureau of Internal Affairs (121) Evidence and Recovered Property Bureau of Patrol - Area North (213)
3 members with 1 complaint each Section (167) 2 members with 1 complaint each 1 member with 1 complaint
Education and Training Division Central Detention (171) Troubled Buildings Section (241)
(124) 1 member with 1 complaint 2 members with 2 complaints 1 member with 1 complaint 2 members with 1 complaint each
Public Safety Information Bureau of Detectives - Area Central Court Section (261)
Technology (PSIT) (125) 3 members with 1 complaint each (610) 3 members with 1 complaint each 2 members with 2 complaints each 2 members with 1 complaint each
Gang Enforcement - Area South Area South . Deputy Chief - Bureau Bureau of Detectives - Area North
(312) 2 members with 1 complaint each 1 member with 2 complaints of Patrol (412) 1 member with 1 complaint (630) 9 members with 1 complaint each
Gang Enforcement - Area North Bomb Unit (442) Detective Division. Area 5 (650)15
(313) 4 members with 1 complaint each 1 member with 1 complaint 1 member with 1 complaint
Canine Unit (341) Detached Services - Governmental Public Transportation Section (701)
1 member with 1 complaint Security Detail (542) 1 member with 1 complaint 2 members with 1 complaint each
Special Weapons and Tactics Arson Section (603) Bureau of Detectives - Area South
(SWAT) Unit) 353 1 member with 1 complaint 1 member with 1 complaint (620) 14 members withl complaint each
Alternate Response Section (376) Central Investigations Unit (606) Area Central. Deputy Chief -
7 members with 1 complaint each 1 member with 2 complaints 6 members with 1 complaint each Bureau of Patrol (411) 1 member with 1 complaint
Juvenile Intervention Support (384) 1 member with 1 complaint Forensics Services Division (177) 1 member with 1 complaint
15 The Area 5 Detective Division was eliminated on March 4, 2012. The complaint reflected above was initiated against a member assigned to this district at the time of the alleged misconduct.
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
IV. Community Outreach and Agency Reforms
Community Engagement
We truly believe and understand that giving voice to the community, especially those who are most affected by police misconduct, is central to IPRA rebuilding trust within the community. In order to build a foundation of trust, IPRA is committed to engaging with the community on issues of police accountability.
During the first quarter of 2016, Chief Administrator Fairley and members of her team met with community members to discuss the vision for the agency moving forward and also to gain feedback on how IPRA could improve on its mission of police accountability. This quarter we attended and spoke at several community meetings, including:
Cook County 1st District Faith Based and Community Partnership Monthly Meeting held at Friendship Baptist
Austin Community Action Council
Concerned Neighbors Organization (C.N.O) Community Resource Fair at Robert A. Black Elementary School.
Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention
Pulaski International School of Chicago
Westside Chapter of the NAACP
Operation PUSH
Agency Reforms
While rebuilding trust with the community is front and center in our efforts moving forward, we also have other mission critical projects internally that we have undertaken during the 1st Quarter. In order to reassure the public that we are truly reforming we've realigned our people, output and resources around four values:
Integrity, Transparency, Independence and Timeliness
In an effort to integrate these values into our agency, we've taken the following actions:
Historical Officer-Involved Shooting Investigation Audit: IPRA has enlisted a nationally recognized outside law firm, McGuire Woods, to undertake an historical audit of Officer-Involved Shooting investigations. The purpose of this important initiative is threefold: (1) to assess the quality and thoroughness of IPRA investigations; (2) to assess the accuracy of IPRA's findings and outcomes; and (3) to assess the impact that CPD's "Use of Deadly Force" policy has had on the outcomes of these investigations. These objective findings will assist and inform senior leadership at IPRA in identifying a way to bring greater integrity and independence to the investigative process and output. The learning from this analysis will inform the future work of all entities that form Chicago's police accountability infrastructure.
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
Policy Development and Recommendations: In order to more successfully fulfill IPRA's mandate, as specifically outlined in our establishing ordinance, we are building up our in-house policy development capabilities. Our goal is to build in-house expertise not only on police accountability policy issues, but also on policing strategies and programs so that IPRA can serve as a catalyst for positive change in CPD policies and practices.
IPRA Performance Evaluation System: In order to develop a culture that demands excellence and integrity, we've introduced a new performance evaluation system for all of our employees to foster greater commitment to IPRA's core values (integrity, independence, transparency, timeliness) and will also measure individual performance against metrics that are directly relevant to the quality and timeliness of the work.
Case Management and Review: We've also implemented a heightened Chain of Command Review Process and Semi-annual Case Reviews to ensure the quality of the investigative process and the accuracy of our findings and outcomes.
C. IPRA Rules
In support of our goal to become more transparent about the work that we do and how we do it, we are making available for public comment a set of rules that govern our investigative process and outcomes. The draft set of rules will be published on the IPRA website for 45 days. We hope to promulgate a final version of the rules to become effective on or about June 1, 2016.
V. First Quarter Policy Recommendation
Pursuant to MCC Section 2-57-40(i), IPRA is empowered to make recommendations to CPD regarding its policies and procedures. In the wake of several high profile excessive force incidents involving persons with mental illness, we have decided to focus our first quarter 2016 report on CPD's handling of incidents involving mental health issues. IPRA's full report is forthcoming. In the meantime, we have outlined a few preliminary recommendations below.
It is widely recognized that Crisis Intervention Training for police officers is an important component to a department's policies and practices related to the handling of individuals in mental health crisis. The Chicago Police Department (CPD) requires that Crisis Intervention Training (CIT) be provided to all of its incoming new recruits and all officers being promoted into supervisory positions. This training is offered to other department members on a voluntary basis. At this time, there are approximately 1,890 CPD members who have received CIT training.
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
The following schematic describes how CPD responds to 911 calls involving individuals in mental health crisis:
CPD's Current CIT Response Process
Intake
o OEMC receives calls for service and can classify calls as mental health-related. Currently, only approximately 0.6% of incoming 911 calls are identified as involving individuals in mental health crisis. Studies show that the actual percentage may be as high as 1.4%.16
Dispatch
o After OEMC classifies calls as mental health-related, OEMC then dispatches CIT-trained officers, if appropriately identified in the OEMC system and available to respond.
Response
o Officers respond to the incident and provide a CIT-informed response or provide a Use of Force-informed response
Outcomes/Reporting
o The individual in crisis is given medical and/or social services and diverted from jail or is
either arrested and jailed or let go. o CPD completes the necessary reports and documentation, and OEMC "codes out" the
call as a mental health-related call.
Preliminary Recommendations
Intake: It is imperative that calls about incidents involving individuals in mental health crisis be appropriately identified by call-takers, such that the appropriate department resources can be dispatched in response to the call. To that end, OEMC should ensure that their dispatchers are
16 Statistics based on OEMC-provided data and published interviews. Source: Adelle Waldman, "Police struggle with approach to the mentally ill," March 17, 2004, citing from interview with James Fyfe, Deputy Commissioner for Training, New York Police Department, .
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
appropriately trained and that there are relevant protocols in place to effectively identify calls related to mental health or psychological issues. It is our understanding the CPD has undertaken an evaluation of the OEMC training and protocols related to this issue. We look forward to learning about their future plans and initiatives.
Outcomes and Reporting: CPD should institute specific, measurable, and relevant metrics to assess the performance of the Department in achieving the goals of the CIT program. These metrics could include measuring the number of mental health-related calls the City receives over a certain period, how many CIT trained officers are dispatched to mental health-related calls, how those calls are resolved, and the ultimate outcomes of those calls, including how many mental health calls resulted in arrest vs. transport to a mental health facility, how many resulted in involuntary admission, and how many resulted in provision of social services.
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
I
I
Appendix17
The tables below depict the number of complaints lodged against members per unit and total complaints lodged against members in each unit. Table 1 is ordered numerically by the unit number. Table 2 is ordered from highest to lowest by percentage of members in unit with a complaint.
Table 1
m HM §§§| lp§ |109|299 21 21 7.02% 0.070234114 |109|351 19 19 5.41% 0.054131054 |109|352 29 35 8.24% 0.099431818 |109|362 25 28 6.91% 0.077348066 |109|333 37 40 11.11% 0.12012012 |109|389 31 39 7.97% 0.100257069 |109|442 21 23 4.75% 0.052036199 |109|383 25 27 6.53% 0.070496084 |10 9|362 20 20 5.52% 0.055248619
10 348 14 15 4.02% 0.043103448
11 438 28 32 6.39% 0.073059361
12 346|999|2.02% 0.020231214
14 238 12 12 5.04% 0.050420168
15 336 25 27 7.44% 0.080357143
16 234 15 17 6.41% 0.072649573
17 224|999|2.68% 0.026785714
18 339 14 15 4.13% 0.044247788
19 355 23 23 6.48% 0.064788732
20 222 9 11 4.05% 0.04954955
22 255 18 18 7.06% 0.070588235
24 286|99 9|1.05% 0.031468531
25 349 31 33 8.88% 0.094555874
44 206|9 9| 0.00%|9 9|
45|9999|33.33% 0.333333333
50 126|999|4.76% 0.047619048
51 42|999|4.76% 0.047619048
55 24|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
57 65|999|1.54% 0.015384615
59 44|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
60 9|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
79 29|999|3.45% 0.034482759
102 14|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
17 CPD provided total number of officers by Unit. IPRA did not validate CPD's numbers. IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
¦¦.*5Totel^ii l#^fficere;v 4!iwitriW' ' ^mplajrits; ~;Septal \ '; ,;^qm^ja|nts^'^ ;;i:)|6m|^ajnt;^: '¦ per Off icer ; .
111 16|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
114 42|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
115 31|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
116 68|999|4.41% 0.044117647
120|9999|14.29% 0.142857143
121 93|999|3.23% 0.032258065
122 13|999|7.69% 0.076923077
123 63|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
124 153|999|1.96% 0.032679739
125 74|999|4.05% 0.040540541
126 12|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
127 31|999|3.23% 0.032258065
128|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
129|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
130|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
133|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
135|9999|28.57% 0.285714286
136 11|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
140 11|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
•141 9|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
142 23|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
145 37|999|10.81% 0.108108108
148|9999|25.00% 0.25
153 18|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
161 11|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
163|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
166 117|999|4.27% 0.05982906
167 44|999|4.55% 0.045454545
169|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
171 35|999|2.86% 0.028571429
172|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
177 52|999|1.92% 0.019230769
179|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
180 25|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
184|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
188 15|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
189 347 47 52 13.54% 0.149855908
191 54|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
192 51|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
193 159 35 53 22.01% 0.333333333
196 33|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
211 139 14 16 10.07% 0.115107914
212 101 12 12 11.88% 0.118811881
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
district;; Officers ir^Offiders'v -Complaints,: #Complaints :%^^icers^ VP;. with -.v/i Complaints .Cbitiplajnt; : >;p^r;o'ffiC(sr
213 .114|999|0.88% 0.00877193
222|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
231 16|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
241 23|999|8.70% 0.086956522
261 49|999|4.08% 0.040816327
277 86|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
311 77 10 14 12.99% 0.181818182
312 70|999|4.29% 0.057142857
313 67|999|5.97% 0.059701493
341 43|999|2.33% 0.023255814
353 66|999|1.52% 0.015151515
376 215|99 9|3.72% 0.041860465
384 43|999|2.33% 0.023255814
393 55|999|7.27% 0.072727273
412 16|999|6.25% 0.0625
442 15|999|6.67% 0.066666667
541|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
542 18|999|5.56% 0.055555556
543 50|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
545|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
549|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
603 22|999|4.55% 0.045454545
606 108|999|5.56% 0.055555556
608 29|999|3.45% 0.034482759
610 297|999|1.68% 0.023569024
620 258 14 14 5.43% 0.054263566
630 261 9 9 3.45% 0.034482759
701 127|999|1.57% 0.015748031
702|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
704 704|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
711 12|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
712 17|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
Table 2
111 V-,*'.'y.-''i«''.'*3 ^Jfitaj,^ llllll 'i^m^ainte irjercerrtageiofi ^Complaints ^ |Ggmblaint;i fpefcpfficer ;
45|9999|33.33% 0.333333
135|9999|28.57% 0.285714
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
'-Umt \6fficers : .• ;¦> . in Unit I?^6ffic:fersTi. Gorhplaints Vimade in .> ^v:^.v;svrK,;.;"V.¦•,••^':¦¦. 2016tQl ; 4£^ta).Vvi: ^eomplaLhtS/ made iri Percentage of . ebmplaints ' ediriplaiht^ . per\off1cep'; '. '1' r. :'-, '--. . V.'1 :. • . .-'¦ lj.:.-; .V
148|999|l 25.00% 0.25
193 159 35 53 22.01% 0.333333
120|9999|14.29% 0.142857
189 347 47 52 13.54% 0.149856
311 77 10 14 12.99% 0.181818
212 101 12 12 11.88% 0.118812 |109|333 37 40 11.11% 0.12012
145 37|999|10.81% 0.108108
211 139 14 16 10.07% 0.115108
25 349 31 33 8.88% 0.094556
241 23|999|8.70% 0.086957 |109|352 29 35 8.24% 0.099432 |109|389 31 39 7.97% 0.100257
122 13|999|7.69% 0.076923
15 336 25 27 7.44% 0.080357
393 55|999|7.27% 0.072727
22 255 18 18 7.06% 0.070588 |109|299 21 21 7.02% 0.070234 |109|362 25 28 6.91% 0.077348
442 15|999|6.67% 0.066667 |109|383 25 27 6.53% 0.070496
19 355 23 23 6.48% 0.064789
16 234 15 17 6.41% 0.07265
11 438 28 32 6.39% 0.073059
412 16|999|6.25% 0.0625
313 67|999|5.97% 0.059701
542 18|999|5.56% 0.055556
606 108|999|5.56% 0.055556 |10 9|362 20 20 5.52% 0.055249
620 258 14 14 5.43% 0.054264 |109|351 19 19 5.41% 0.054131
14 238 12 12 5.04% 0.05042
50 126|999|4.76% 0.047619
51 42|999|4.76% 0.047619 |109|442 21 23 4.75% 0.052036
167 44|999|4.55% 0.045455
603 22|999|4.55% 0.045455
116 68|999|4.41% 0.044118
312 70|999|4.29% 0.057143
166 117|999|4.27% 0.059829
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
'¦*,'iTT"'''!?i!if;'v. ^Officers'; isiniUniti'i Officers >wrth, Complaints,' N^Q16gi : . ^-Total-V Complaints^ madoin : ' ^Complaints m Complaiiit" ^pe'Rbificef^
18 339 14 15 4.13% 0.044248
261 49|999|4.08% 0.040816
20 222 9 11 4.05% 0.04955
125 74|999|4.05% 0.040541
10 348 14 15 4.02% 0.043103
376 215|99 9|3.72% 0.04186
79 29|999|3.45% 0.034483
608 29|999|3.45% 0.034483
630 261 9 9 3.45% 0.034483
121 93|999|3.23% 0.032258
127 31|999|3.23% 0.032258
171 35|999|2.86% 0.028571
17 224|999|2.68% 0.026786
341 43|999|2.33% 0.023256
384 43|999|2.33% 0.023256
12 346|999|2.02% 0.020231
124 153|999|1.96% 0.03268
177 52|999|1.92% 0.019231
610 297|999|1.68% 0.023569
701 127|999|1.57% 0.015748
57 65|999|1.54% 0.015385
353 66|999|1.52% 0.015152
24 286|99 9|1.05% 0.031469
213 114|999|0.88% 0.008772
44 206|9 9| 0.00%|9 9|
55 24|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
59 44|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
60 9|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
102 14|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
111 16|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
114 42|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
115 31|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
123 63|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
126 12|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
128|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
129|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
130|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
133|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
136 11|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
140 11|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report
i
i
^hit- t till Total • •?'nc-'^, .^Officers; ^mUnit^ V^/.-*" '^Officers ^^with,:,-< ^mpiaihts • •2016Q1: r Hjotal./ •' "2016Q1 Percentage of" Off'iters with -i '^Cj^plajnjte :^ ;gpmpb|nt''i Iper^ffice'r''* 'if X '.)¦.:
141 9|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
142 23|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
153 18|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
161 11|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
163|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
169|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
172|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
179|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
180 25|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
184|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
188 15|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
191 54|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
192 51|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
196 33|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
222|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
231 16|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
277 86|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
541|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
543 50|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
545|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
549|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
702|99 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
704 704|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
711 12|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
712 17|9 9 9|0.00%|9 9|
IPRA 2016 First Quarter Report