Dr.i'MiTMi'.NT ov Law
CITY OF CM ICACO
December 20, 2017
Ms. Andrea M. Valencia City Clerk
121 North LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60602
Re: Revised Redevelopment Plan for the Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area
Dear Ms. Valencia:
I enclose a Revised Proposed Foster/Edens Tax Increment Redevelopment Area Redevelopment Plan and Project (the "Plan") for the Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area, Chicago, Illinois, dated December 19, 2017, replacing an earlier version of the Plan dated as of, and filed with your office on, September 29, 2017.
Please make the Plan available in your office as of this date for public inspection in accordance with the requirements of Section 5/11-74.5-5(a) of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74-4-1 et seq., as amended. If you have any questions with respect to this matter, please call me at 744-8973.
Michael L. Gaynor Senior Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Ryan Slattery
12 1 \ ( MMil I A.SAI l.L S I R |-.[-.T. K( )( i\| 1,110. ( 1-1 I (A (; O . ILLINOIS hOOO'J
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project
City of Chicago, Illinois
September 29, 2017 Revised December 19, 2017
G5' —J
— ~n m
City of Chicago Rah in Emanuel, Mayor
Department of Planning and Development David L. Rcifman, Commissioner
cn en
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
TABU:", OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary
Redevelopment Area Description
Redevelopment Area Goals and Zoning
Summary of Blighting Conditions in tiie Area
Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project
Vi. Conformity to Comprehensive Plan
VI!. Provisions tor Amending the Plan
win c.i—ii: — -nil ¦¦¦
* iii. .j^ i it^vi u 1111 ^ \n i ¦ c IJ J
Affirmative Action Plan
Lack of Growth Through Private Investment
Financial and Service Impacts on Taxing Districts
yii r^.-.,.i,,c:~„,.
Eligibility Report
Appendix
Appendix Table 1 - Parcel Numbers and estimated 2016 Equalized Assessed Value
Legal Description
Map 1 - Boundary Map
Map 2 - Existing Land Use Map
Map 3 - Proposed Land Use Map
I'o.sfer/lldens Tux Increment l'mattcing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project ¦¦ September 29, 201', Revised December I1), 2017
->
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction
The City of Chicago (the "City") is dedicated to the continued growth and economic development of the City. Chicago's ability to stimulate growth and development relies on the creation and implementation of government programs that will allow the City to work with the private sector to eliminate blighted areas and ensure sound growth and development of property. Based upon the City's establishment of a redevelopment project area as described herein, it is understood that the City recognizes the necessity of the relationship between continued community growth and public participation. The blighting of communities impairs the value of private investment and threatens the growth of the community's tax base. Additionally, the City understands the vulnerability associated with blighting factors and problems arising from blighted conditions.
The Illinois General Assembly passed the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ll.CS 5/1 1-74.4-1 el. seq.) (the "Act")_to address the growing number of blighted areas in many Illinois municipalities. The blighting of communities impairs the value of private investment and threatens the growth of the community's tax base. The Act declares that in order to promote the public health, safety, morals, and welfare, blighting conditions must be eliminated.
The City's Foster/Edens fax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project (the "Plan"') summarizes the analyses and findings of the consultant's work, which, unless otherwise noted, is the responsibility of Laube Consulting Group, LLC (the "Consultant"). The City is entitled to rely on the findings and conclusions of this Plan in designating the Foster/Edens Redevelopment Project Area (the "Area") as a redevelopment project area under the Act. The Consultant has prepared this Plan and the related eligibility study, as hereinafter defined, with the understanding that the City would rely: 1) on the findings and conclusions of the Plan and the related eligibility study in proceeding with the designation of the Area and the adoption and implementation of the Plan, and 2) on the fact that the Consultant has obtained the necessary information so that the Plan and the related eligibility study will comply with the Act.
Summary of the Plan
The City's Plan was developed to provide a description of the necessary actions to address existing blighting conditions in the Area. From an economic perspective, the implementation of the Plan through the use of tax increment financing revenues should stimulate private investment in the Area. The combined public and private investment that will result from the Plan are anticipated to eliminate the blighting conditions that currently exist in the Area.
The City has no plans to displace any occupied residential units. There are currently 170 residential units in the Area. The City certifies that the displacement of 10 or more inhabited residential units will not occur as a result of this Plan. Therefore, no housing impact study has been undertaken as part of this Plan.
loster/Edcns Tax Increment I'inuncing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 2017
J
Redevelopment Plan and Project
II. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
The Area encompasses approximately 232 acres of land in the City. The Area generally encompasses the Cook County Forest Preserve area to the north, Gompers Park to the east, the Eiston Avenue and Lawrence Avenue commercial corridors from approximately Kilhourn Avenue (to the east) to the Edens expressway (to the west) and the former Sunstar manufacturing properly on the corner of Foster Avenue and the Edens. (See legal description and specific boundary map in the Appendix.)
Based upon the former use of the Area and the current site conditions, it is reasonable to conclude that without the establishment of a redevelopment project area and the use of tax increment financing, the Area is not reasonably anticipated to be developed.
Background of the Area
i'he Area is iocaied in liie Albany Park community area, one o! 77 well-defined community areas on the Northwest Side of the City of Chicago Albany Park is one of the most ethnically diverse communities in the United Stales ll has one of highest percentages oi foreign-born residents of neighborhoods in Chicago.
Although the majority of those foreign-born residents are from Latin America, primarily from Mexico (especially from the state of Michoacan), Guatemala, and Ecuador, substantial numbers are from the Philippines, India, Korea, Cambodia, Somalia, the former Yugoslavia (Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia), Romania, Pakistan and the Middle East (especially Iraq, Iran, and Lebanon). Over 40 different languages are spoken in Albany Park's public schools.
Due to the diverse population and immigrant population attraction, the population of the neighborhood increased by 16.5% during the 1990s, ll is pari of the 60625 zip code, which is known as one of the most diverse areas in the entire country
The Area specifically consists of the former Sunstar manufacturing site, the commercial corridors on Eiston and Lawrence and recreational open space at the Forest Preserve and Gompers Park, which do not include any commercial corridors
Overview of the Area
The Area is a diverse area consisting of many different land uses. The core of the Area is the currently vacant Sunstar site. The building has been demolished and the building debris remains on the site. The Eiston and Lawrence Avenue commercial corridors are a vast mix of uses that encompass restaurants, neighborhood retail, auto shops, light manufacturing, and residential uses. Gompers Park is being included because of the condition of the field house, fields and courts, which are in significant need of repair and replacement.
Foster/Fdens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 201 7|1010|
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
III. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA GOALS
The Act encourages public and private sector cooperation to address and resolve issues with deteriorating and declining areas. The continued investment in and development of the Area will strengthen not only the Area, but also the entire City through sound economic growth, an increased tax base, and additional employment opportunities.
The Plan is based on the following redevelopment goals:
General Conls of the City
Eliminate blighting conditions which prevent further development of the Area;
Restore and expand the tax base in order to maintain a high level of services, programs, and facilities;
Encourage use of environmentally sustainable design standards:
Stimulate private investment;
Encourage new development and expansion in an orderly manner:
Encourage productive use of underutilized and vacant property:
Restore and enhance the property tax base within the Area;
Encourage sales tax producing enterprises in the Area;
Enhance the City's image as a desirable place to live;
Improve efforts to facilitate and attract new housing and commercial development by serving as a catalyst to the private sector;
Create opportunities for Minority Owned and Women Owned business enterprises;
Create market rate and affordable housing options for residents;
Utilize the parcels in the Area and surrounding area for a development that is in conformance with the City's overall planning efforts.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 2017|1010|
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
IV. SUMMARY OK MUGHTING GONDI I IONS EXISTING IN THE AREA
As set forth in the Act. the Illinois General Assembly has determined that, in order to promote and protect the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the public, blighted conditions need to be eradicated. The Act also states that the eradication of these blighted conditions is essential to the public interest and that the use of tax incl ement financing revenues to fund certain redevelopment projects is of benefit to the community.
Pnor io the passage of an ordinance adopting tax increment financing, there are certain statutory requirements that must be met. One of the requirements for eligibility of the area as a redevelopment project area under the Act is that the municipality must demonstrate that the Area qualifies as a ''blighted area". Based on site inspections, surveys and area analysis, the Area qualifies for designation as an improved blighted area as defined in the Act.
Improved Kligliivii A rest
ri, 1:1- ,: :. i. i i. : r i i- i. . r.i . i i- i .- >•
i in- ijiui i u ii_ai ivm i un.itu l.'ll ill I ill liiiv -,im jlCIIUMIICU I Lgdl Ulllg C'clLll UI 11 If VdCailL UllgllLlllU UICIOI'S
listed iii the Act to Jciei tin fie whether each or any are present in i'ne Area. and. if so. to what extent and in what locations. The corresponding Eligibility Report for the Area prepared by the Consultant (the "Eligibility Report") describes in detail the methodology and analysis performed resulting in the conclusion that the Area qualities as a blighted area under the Act. The Act requires that 5 of 13 possible blighting factors be present and reasonably distributed throughout the Area in order to qualify as such.
for the improved parcels, the Consultant found that on an overall basis 8 of the possible 13 blighting factors are present throughout the Area, 8 to a major extent and 1 to a limited extent. The most frequent blighted factors found throughout the Area are as follows:
Dilapidation
Deterioration
» Obsolescence
Excessive Vacancies
» Deleterious Land Use and Layout
« Excessive Land Coverage
Inadequate Utilities
Lack of Community Planning
Declining EAV
Foster/Edens Fax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 2017
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Additionally, lor the vacant parcels, the Consultant has found that on an overall basis 3 of the possible 7 blighting factors are present throughout the Area The factors present are:
Factor 1
Obsolete Platting
Environmental Clean Up Costs
Declining EAV
(the above 3 sub-criteria comprise one criteria under the Act
Factor 2 - Rail
- Factor 3 - Unused Disposal Site (to a limited extent)
Please see the accompanying-Eligibility Report for detailed qualification criteria and findings.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 201-7|1010|
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
This section presents the Plan to be implemented by the City in the Area. The section is divided into the following subsections:
Redevelopment Objectives
Redevelopment Plan and Project Costs and Activities General Land Use Plan Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs Sources of Funds to Pay Redevelopment Project Costs Issuance of Obligations Surplus Incremental Property Tax Revenue Most Recent EAV Anticipated EAV Potential Future Site Acquisition ATfordabie 1 lousing
Redevelopment and Intergovernmental1 Agicements Potential Future Relocation Needs
Redevelopment Objectives
The following represent major redevelopment objectives for the Area:
Enhance the City's image as a desirable place to iive;
Encourage productive use of underutilized and/or vacant properties;
Eliminate blighting conditions which prevent further development of the Area;
Stimulate private investment;
Increase revenue (e.g property and sales tax revenue) generation of property within the Area;
Assemble or encourage the assembly of land for redevelopment in accordance with this Plan;
» Encourage functional and visually attractive buildings, rights-of-way. and open spaces and encourage high standards of design;
Provide needed incentives to encourage a broad range of improvements and new development;
Provide opportunities for minority-owned and women-owned businesses to share in the redevelopment of the Area;
Improve existing park land and facilities;
Provide market rale and affordable housing options for the City's residents;
Encourage use of environmentally sustainable design standards: and
Encourage the use of public transit.
Foster/Edens Fax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29. 2017, Revised December 19, 2017
. 8
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Redevelopment Plan and Project Costs and Activities
The various redevelopment expenditures that are eligible lor payment or reimbursement under the Act are reviewed below. Following this review is a list of estimated redevelopment project costs that are deemed to be necessary to implement this Plan (the "Redevelopment Project Costs.")
In the event the Act is amended after the date of the approval of this Plan by the City Council of Chicago to: (a) include new eligible redevelopment project costs, or (b) expand the scope or increase the amount of existing eligible redevelopment project costs (such as, for example, by increasing the amount of incurred interest costs that may be paid under 65 1LC5 5/1 1-74.4-3(q)(l 1)), this Plan shall be deemed to incorporate such additional, expanded or increased eligible costs as Redevelopment Project Costs under the Plan, to the extent permitted by the Act. In the event of such amcndment(s) to the Act, the City may add any new eligible redevelopment project costs as a line item in Plan Fable 1 or otherwise adjust the line items in Plan Table 1 below without amendment to this Plan, to the extent permitted by the Act. In no instance, however, shall such additions or adjustments result in any increase in the total Redevelopment Project Costs without complying with the Act which currently necessitates an amendment to the Plan.
1. Eligible Redevelopment Costs
To achieve the goals outlined above, the City proposes to assist with the redevelopment of designated parcels located in the Area through the use of tax increment financing. Redevelopment Project Costs include the sum total of all reasonable or necessary costs incurred, estimated to be incurred, or incidental to this Plan pursuant to the Act (including any costs incurred as necessary or desirable in formulating or that are incidental to this Plan, such as but not limited to costs for architects, engineers, planners, lawyers and other consultants related to such planning work). Such costs may include, without limitation, the following:
Costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and administration of the Plan including but not limited to. staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other services (excluding lobbying expenses), provided that no charges for professional services are based on a percentage of the tax increment collected;
The costs of marketing sites within the Area to prospective businesses, developers and investors;
Property assembly costs, including but not limited to, acquisition of land and other properly, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of buildings, site preparation, environmental remediation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground level or below ground environmental contamination, including, but not limited to parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, engineering, and the clearing and grading of land;
d) Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction or repair or remodeling of existing public or private
buildings, fixtures, and leasehold improvements; and the costs of replacing an existing public
building if pursuant to the implementation of a redevelopment project.the existing public building
is to be demolished to use the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring
private investment;
i'oster/Edens lax Increment f inancing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 20/7, Revised December 19, 20/7|10 10|
C ity of Ch icago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Costs of the construction o!"public works or improvements subject to the limitations in Section i i-74.4-3(q)(4) of the Act;
Costs of job training and retraining projects including the cost of "welfare to work" programs implemented by businesses located within the Area and such proposals feature a community-based training program which ensures maximum reasonable opportunities for residents of the community area with particular attention to the needs of those residents who have previously experienced inadequate employment opportunities and development of job-related skills including residents of public and other subsidized housing and people with disabilities;
Financing costs including, but not limited to. all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued thereunder including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and for a period not exceeding 36 months following completion and including reasonable reserves related thereto:
if) i o lite extent the City by written agreement accepts and approves the same, ail or a portion ot a taxing district's capital costs resulting from the redevelopment project necessarily incurred or io be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of the Plan;
i) Relocation costs to the extent that the City determines that relocation costs shall be paid or is required to make payment of relocation costs by federal or state law or by Section 74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act;
j) Payment in lieu of taxes, as defined in the Act;
k) Costs of job training, retraining, advanced vocational education or career education, including but not limited to, courses in occupational, semi-technical or technical fields leading directly to employment, incurred by one or more taxing districts, provided that such costs: (i) are related to the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vocational education or career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in the Area; and (ii) when incurred by a taxing district or taxing districts other than the City, are set forth in a written agreement by or among the City and the taxing district or taxing districts, which agreement describes the program to be undertaken including but not limited to, the number of employees to be trained, a description of the training and services to be provided, the number and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program and sources of funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the payment by community college districts of costs pursuant to Sections 3-37. 3-38, 3-40. and 3-40.1 of the Public Community College Act, 1 10 1LCS 805/3-37, 805/3-38, 805/3-40 and 805/3-40.1, and by school districts of costs pursuant to Sections 10-22.20a and 10-23.3a of the School Code, 105 1LCS 5/IO-22.20a and 5/10-23.3a;
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 20i 7
10
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
I) Interest costs incurred by a redeveloper related to the construction, renovation or rehabilitation of a redevelopment project provided that:
such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation fund established pursuant to the Act;
such payments in any one year may not exceed 30 percent of the annual interest costs incurred by the redeveloper with regard to the redevelopment project during that year;
if there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax allocation fund to make the payment pursuant to this provision, then the amounts so due shall accrue and be payable when sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund;
the total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may not exceed 30 percent of the total: (i) cost paid or incurred by the redeveloper for such redevelopment project;.(ii) redevelopment project costs excluding any property assembly costs and any relocation costs incurred by the City pursuant to the Act:
for the financing of rehabilitated or new housing for low-income households and very low-income households, as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Mousing Act, the percentage of 75 percent shall be substituted for 30 percent in subparagraphs 2 and 4 above.
m) Unless explicitly provided in the Act, the cost of construction of new privately-owned buildings shall not be an eligible redevelopment project cost;
n) An elementary, secondary, or unit school district's increased costs attributable to assisted housing units will be reimbursed as provided by the Act;
o) Instead of the eligible costs provided for in 1) 1. 2. 4 and 5 above, the City may pay up to 50 percent of the cost of construction, renovation and/or rehabilitation of all low- and very low-income housing units (for ownership or rental) as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. If the units are part of a residential redevelopment project that includes units not affordable to low- and very low-income households, only the low- and very low-income units shall be eligible for benefits under the Act; and
p) The costs of daycare services for children of employees from low-income families working for businesses located within the Area and all or a portion of the cost of operation of day care centers established by Area businesses to serve employees from low-income families working in businesses located in the Area. For the purposes ol this paragraph, "low-income families" means families whose annual income does not exceed 80 percent of the City, county or regional median income as determined, from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
q) If a special service area has been established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act. 35 ILCS 235/0.01 et scy then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service Area fax Act may be used within the redevelopment project area for the
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December I'), 20/7
II
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
purposes permitted by the Special Service Area Tax Act as well as the purposes permitted by the
A ,.i
r\\~ l.
General Land Use Plan
The proposed laud use plan for the Area includes the following uses:
Residential
Residential is generally defined as single-family detached and attached dwelling units, multiple family units, senior multiple family dwelling units and any accessory uses lor purposes of this Plan.
Commercial
Commercial is generally defined as retail, ollice, hospitality/hotel, health clubs, entertainment, restaurant facilities, educational, and institutional for purposes o! this Plan.
i.1
" UIUII.MI Ull
fndwstiia! is generally defined as warehouse, distribution, manufacturum or technologv based manufacturing.
Parks/Open Space
Parks/Open Space is generally defined as recreational areas for purposes of this Plan.
Mixed-Use Residential/Commercial/lndustrial
Mixed use is defined as any of the above uses combined on one site or sites for purposes of this Plan, with the exception of the inclusion of parks and open space.
These general types of uses are consistent with the overall goals of the Area for the following reasons:
Through private investment in redevelopment, the tax base of the Area will increase.
The increased tax base will generate additional incremental properly lax revenues which may be used to fund eligible project costs in accordance with the Plan.
Through private investment and implementation of the Plan, it is reasonably anticipated that the improved land blighting factors will be eliminated.
Through private investment, productive use of underutilized and vacant land will be achieved.
Toster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 201 7, Revised December 19, 2017
City of Ch icago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs
To eliminate the blighting factors present in the Area and to meet the redevelopment objectives, the City plans to make and/or induce a number of improvements in the Area. Plan Table I below identifies the eligible Redevelopment Project Costs under the Act that the City may fund to implement the Plan over the Area's twenty-three (23) year life.
Adjustments to the estimated line item costs in Plan Table I below are anticipated and may be made by the City without amendment to the Plan to the extent permitted by the Act. Each individual project cost will be reevaluated in light of projected private development and resulting incremental tax revenues as it is considered for public financing under the provisions of the Act. The totals of line items set forth below are not intended to place a limit on the described expenditures. Adjustments may be made in line items within the total, either increasing or decreasing line item costs as a result of changed redevelopment costs and needs.
Redevelopment projects in the Area would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the Plan.
Foster/Edens Tux Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 2'), 2017, Revised December l>>. 2017
13
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Plan Table !
Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs Redevelopment Project Area
Eligible A ctivities
1. Analysis, Administration, Studies, Surveys, Legal, Marketing, etc.
Property Assembly including Acquisition. Site Prep and
Demolition, Environmental Remediation
Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Fixtures and
Leasehold Improvements
Affordable I lousing Construction and Rehabilitation Costs
j } Public Works cSi Improvements, including streets raid ! utilities, parks and open space, public facilities (schools cv_ | other public facilities) (Note I below)
6. Job Training, Retrainiim, Wei fare-to-Work
7. Relocation costs
8. Day Care Services
9. Interest subsidy
Total Eligible Redevelopment Project Costs (Notes 2-5 below)
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project - September 29. 2017, Revised December 19, 2017
14
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Notes for Plan Table 1 - Redevelopment Project Costs
This category may also include paying lor or reimbursing (i) an elementary, secondary or unit school districts increased costs attributed to assisted housing units, and (ii) capital costs of taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the Area. As permitted by the Act. to the extent the City by written agreement accepts and approves the same, the City may pay, or reimburse all. or a portion of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from a redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of the Plan. N
Total Redevelopment Project Costs represent an upper limit on expenditures that are to be funded using tax increment revenues and exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense, capitalized interest and costs associated with optional redemptions. These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total Redevelopment Project Costs. Within this limit, adjustments may be made in line items without amendment to this Plan, to the extent permitted by the Act.
The amount of the T otal Redevelopment Project Costs that can be incurred in the Area will be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated from the Area only by a public right-or-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in the Area, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in the Area which are paid from incremental property taxes generated in contiguous redevelopment project areas or those separated from the Area only by a public right-of-way.
All costs are in 201 7 dollars and may be increased by live percent (5%) after adjusting for inflation reflected in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for All Items for the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, IL-IN-W1 CMSA, published by the U.S. Department of Labor. Calculators/Inflation Rate_Caleulator.asp//results
Additional funding from other sources such as federal, state, county, or local grant funds may be utilized to supplement the Cilv's ability to finance Redevelopment Project Costs identified above.
Foster/F.dens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19. 2017
15
City of Ch icago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Sources of Funds
funds necessary to pay for Redevelopment Project Costs and secure municipal obligations issued for such costs are to be derived primarily from incremental property taxes. Other sources of funds which may be used to pay for Redevelopment Project Costs or secure municipal obligations are land disposition proceeds, stale and federal grants, investment income, private financing and other legally permissible funds the City may deem appropriate. The City may incur Redevelopment Project Costs which are paid for from funds of the City other than incremental taxes, and the City may then be reimbursed from such costs from incremental taxes. Also, the City may permit the utilization of guarantees, deposits and other forms of security made available by private sector developers. Additionally, the City may utilize revenues, other than State sales tax increment revenues, received under the Act from one redevelopment project area for eligible costs in another redevelopment project area that is either contiguous to. or is separated only by a public righ!-of-wav from, the redevelopment project area from which the revenues are received.
The Area may be contiguous to or separated bv only a public riuht-of-way from other redevelopment project areas created under the Act. The City may utilize net incremental property taxes received from the Area to pay eligible redevelopment project costs, or obligations issued to pay such costs, in other contiguous redevelopment project areas or project areas separated only by a public right-of-way, and vice versa. The amount of revenue from the Area, made available to support such contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs within the Area, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in this Plan.
The Area may become contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, redevelopment project areas created under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law (65 1LCS 5/11-74.6-1, et seq.). If the City finds that the goals, objectives and financial success of such contiguous redevelopment project areas or those separated only b\ a public right-of-way are interdependent with those of the Area, the City may determine that it is in the best interests of the City and the furtherance of the purposes of the Plan that net revenues from the Area be made available to support any such redevelopment project areas, and vice versa. The City therefore proposes to utilize net incremental revenues received from the Area to pay eligible redevelopment project costs (which are eligible under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law referred to above) in any such areas and vice versa. Such revenues may be transferred or loaned between the Area and such areas. The amount of revenue from the Area so made available, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs within the Area or other areas as described in the preceding paragraph, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in fable 1 of this Plan.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project — September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 2017
16
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Issuance of Obligations
The City may issue obligations seemed by incremental property taxes pursuant to Section II-
7-1/1-7 of the Act. To enhance the security of a municipal obligation, the City may pledge its full
faith and credit through the issuance of general obligations bonds. Additionally, the City may
provide other legally permissible credit enhancements to any obligations issued pursuant to the
Act. " "
The redevelopment project described in the Plan shall be completed, and all obligations issued to finance redevelopment costs shall be retired, no later than December 3 1st of the year in which the payment to the City treasurer as provided in the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year following the year in which the ordinance approving the Area is adopted.
Also, the final maturity dale of any such obligations which are issued may not be later than 20 years from their respective dates of issue. One or more series of obligations may be sold at one or more times in order to implement this Plan. Obligations may be issued on a parity or subordinated basis.
In addition to paying Redevelopment Project Costs, incremental properly taxes may be used for the scheduled retirement of obligations, mandatory or optional redemptions, establishment of debt service reserves and bond sinking funds. To the extent that incremental properly taxes are not needed for these purposes, and are not otherwise required, pledged, earmarked or otherwise designated for the payment of Redevelopment Project Costs, any excess incremental property taxes shall then become available for distribution annually to taxing districts having jurisdiction over the Area in the manner provided by the Act.
Surplus Incremental Tax Revenue
Monies in the special allocation fund established for the Area and.not required for payment and security of the obligations and Redevelopment Project Costs shall be calculated annually and declared surplus. Surplus funds must be distributed to the taxing districts having jurisdiction over the Area in accordance with the Act.
Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation
The purpose of identifying the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("EAV") of the Area is to provide an estimate of the initial EAV which the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental EAV and incremental property taxes of the Area. The 2016 EAV of all taxable parcels in the Area is approximately $26,536,100. This total EAV amount, by PIN, is summarized in Appendix Table 1. The EAV is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk, and shall become the Certified Initial EAV from which all incremental property taxes in the Area will be calculated by Cook County. The Plan has utilized the EAVs for the 2016 tax year. If the 2017 EAV shall become available prior to the date of the adoption of the Plan by the City Council, the City may update the Plan by replacing the 2016 EAV with the 201 7 EAV.
Foster/F.dens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 201 7, Revised December 19, 2017
17
I
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Anticipated Equalized Assessed Valuation
Based upon the implementation ofthe Plan, numerous blighting factors will be eliminated and growth and development ofthe Area will occur in accordance with the redevelopment agreement(s) between the City and businesses in the Area and other interested parties. It is estimated that the total EAV ofthe real properly following completion ofthe Plan in the Area will be approximately $106,000,000 based on a reasonably assumed schedule of development for the Area.
Potential Future Site Acquisition
To meet the goals and objectives of this Plan, the City may acquire and assemble, property throughout the Area. Land assemblage by the City may be by purchase, exchange, donation, iease, eminent domain or through the Cook County Tax Reactivation Program and may be for the purpose ol (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers, or (b) sale, iease, conveyance or dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Furthermore, the City may require written redevelopment agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the City may devote acquired properly to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and development
In connection with the City exercising its power to acquire real property, including the exercise of the power of eminent domain, under the Act in implementing the Plan, the City will follow its customary procedures of having each such acquisition recommended by the City's Community Development Commission (or any.successor commission) and authorized by the City Council of the City. Acquisition of such real property as may be authorized by the City Council does not constitute a change in the nature of this Plan.
The City does not intend to acquire any property in the Area, therefore, no acquisition list is included in the Plan.
Affordable Housing
The City requires that developers who receive tax increment financing assistance for market rale housing set aside 20% ofthe units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Planning and Development or any successor agency. Generally, this means the affordable for-sale units should be priced at a level that is affordable to persons earning no more than 100% ofthe area median income, and affordable rental units should be affordable to persons earning no more than 60% ofthe area median income. Specific requirements ol each development shall be set forth in each respective redevelopment agreement.
Redevelopment and Intergovernmental Agreements
The City may enter into redevelopment agreements or intergovernmental agreements with private entities or public entities to construct, rehabilitate, renovate or restore private or public improvements on one or several parcels (collectively referred to as "Redevelopment Projects"").
Foster/Fden.s Tax increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 2017
IS
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Potential Future Relocation Needs
Relocation assistance may be provided in order to facilitate redevelopment of portions of the Area, and to meet the other City objectives. Businesses or households legally occupying properties to be acquired by the City may be provided with relocation advisory and financial assistance as determined by the City.
CONFORMITY TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
This Plan includes land uses which will be approved by the Chicago Plan Commission prior to the adoption ofthe Plan.
Therefore, the overall proposed laud use is consistent with the intent and direction set forth by comprehensive and strategic planning efforts.
PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING THE PLAN
The Plan may be amended by the City in accordance with the provisions in the Act.
SCHEDULING OF PLAN
Over the life ofthe Area, the timing of business investment cannot be predicted with precision. However, it is reasonable to expect the following public and private investments over the life of the Area. As the Plan is implemented, the numerous blighting factors present in the Area will be eliminated and the following activities are likely to occur:
Clearing and grading ofthe land within the Area
Provision for adequate water, sewers and electrical power to support development
Construction of new retail and commercial development
Improvements to the existing Chicago Park District facilities
Construction of commercial buildings that will support retail, office, and other commercial uses
Reconstruction, renovation, and extension of public roadways as required to service existing and new businesses
Private investment in new facilities
The dates of completion of the Plan and retirement of obligations issued to finance Redevelopment Project Costs shall not be later than December 3 I ofthe year in which the payment to the City Treasurer is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year after the year in which the ordinance approving the Area is adopted.
Foster/Edens Fax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Plan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19. 2017
P)
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan ami Project
VIII. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN
The City is committed to and will affirmatively implement the following principles with respect to this Plan:
The assurance of equal opportunity in all personnel and employment actions, w ith respect to the Plan, including, but not limited to hiring, training, transfer, promotion, discipline, fringe benefits, salary, employment working conditions, termination, etc without regard to race, color, sex. age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry . marital status, parental status, military discharge status, source of income, sexual orientation, or housing status.
Developers must: meet the City's standards for participation of 26 percent Minority Business Enterprises and 6 percent Woman Business Enterprises and the City Resident Construction Worker Employment Requirement as required in redevelopment
a<_M'i:l"IVH-Mllis
This commitment to affirmative action and nondiscrimination will ensure that all members ofthe protected groups are sought out to compete for all job openings and promotional opportunities.
Developers will meet City standards for any applicable prevailing wage rate as ascertained by the Illinois Department of Labor to all project employees.
The City shall have the right in its sole discretion to exempt certain small businesses, residential property owners and developers from the above.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project - September 29, 201 7, Revised December 19, 2017
20
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
IX. LACK OF GROWTH THROUGH PRIVATE INVESTMENT
Based on the Consultant's observations and research ol" the Area, there has been little new construction or much significant redevelopment in the Area as evidenced by:
The former Sunstar site is demolished and completely vacant.
Lack of investment shown by the condition ofthe buildings, the deleterious land uses, and functional and economic obsolescence within the commercial corridor areas.
i
The presence ofthe blighting conditions, as detailed in the Eligibility Report, creates an impediment to the further development ofthe site.
The Area is an excellent example ofthe type of area which lacks the requisite private investment to prevent or eliminate blighting factors in the general area and promote business growth and the health, safely, and morals ofthe community. Therefore, without the adoption ofthe Plan and the use of tax increment allocation financing, the Area is not expected to see significant investment from private enterprise. As a result, there is a genuine threat that property values in the Area will stagnate or decline.
This Plan describes the comprehensive redevelopment program proposed to be undertaken by the City to create an environment in which private investment can reasonably occur. If a redevelopment project is successful, various new projects may be undertaken that will assist in alleviating the blighting conditions, creating new jobs, and promoting both public and private development in the Area.
The implementation of the Plan is expected to have short and long term financial impacts on the affected taxing districts. During the period when tax increment is utilized, real estate tax revenues from the increases in EAV over and above the certified base EAV may be used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs in the Area. At the time when the Area is no longer in place under the Act, the real estate tax revenues resulting from the redevelopment ofthe Area will be distributed to all taxing districts levying taxes against property located in the Area. These revenues will then be available for use by all taxing districts.
In summary, the Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise, and the Area is not reasonably anticipated to further develop without the direct participation ofthe City through the implementation ofthe Plan and the use of tax increment financing.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project — September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 2017
21
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
X. FINANCIAL AND SERVICE IMPACTS ON TAXING DISTRICTS
The Act requires an assessment of any financial impact of the Area on, or any increased demand for services from, any taxing district affected by the Plan and a description of any program to address such financial impacts or increased demand. The City intends to monitor development in the Area and with the cooperation ofthe other affected taxing districts will attempt to ensure that any increased needs are addressed in connection with any particular development.
The following major taxing districts levy property tax on land located within the Area:
Cook County - Cook County lias the principal responsibility for the protection of persons and property , the provision of public health services, and the maintenance of County highways.
Cook County Forest Preserve District - This District is responsible for acquisition, restoration and management of lands for the purpose of protecting and preserving open space in the City and County for the education, pleasure and recreation ofthe public.
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago - This District provides the main sewerage lines for the collection, treatment, and disposal of waste water from municipalities.
Chicago Community College District 508 - This district is a unit of the State of Illinois' public community college system. Their objective is to meet the educational needs of the residents ofthe City and other Illinois residents seeking higher educational programs and vocational services.
Board of Education ofthe City of Chicago - The Board of Education is responsible for the provision of educational services and the provision, operation, and maintenance of education facilities for students ranging from Kindergarten through Senior Year in High School (e.g., 12"' Grade).
Chicago Park District - This District is responsible for the provision, maintenance, and operation of park and recreational facilities throughout the City.
City of Chicago - The City is responsible for the provision of a wide range of municipal services, including, but not limited to: sanitation, water distribution and supply, police protection, lire protection, planning and development, building, housing and zoning codes, and many others.
In addition to the major taxing districts delineated above, the City of Chicago Library Fund and Chicago Urban Transportation District have taxing jurisdiction over the Area. Although these districts no longer extend taxing levies, they continue to exist for purposes ol receiving delinquent property taxes.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project - September 29, 2017, Revised December 19, 20i7
7 7
City of Ch icago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Impact ofthe Redevelopment Plan and Project
The implementation of this Plan is anticipated to have a direct impact on the following taxing districts:
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Chicago The development of currently vacant and underutilized land in the Area may cause increased demand for services and capital improvements provided by the Water Reclamation District.
Chicago Park District - The future development ofthe park open space is anticipated to cause an increase in the demand for Park District services and capital improvements, furthermore, the implementation of this Plan is anticipated to be able to make improvements to Park District facilities.
City of Chicago • The replacement of currently vacant property with commercial space is anticipated to increase the demand for police protection, fire protection, sanitary collection, sewer service, recycling, etc.
Program to Address Increased Demand for Services or Capital Improvements
These taxing districts will continue to receive property tax revenues net of any incremental property tax revenues attributable to new development within the Area during the 23-year life of the Area. It is also reasonable to assume that the economic and financial benefits resulting from redevelopment efforts in the Area will extend into other sections of the adjacent community and generate additional revenues for the affected taxing districts. In addition, after the 23-year life of the Area, the taxing districts will receive the benefits of an increased property tax base. It is also reasonable to assume that the benefits of the increased property tax base would not occur without the implementation ofthe Plan and the use of tax increment financing. Specific programs for each affected taxing district are as follows:
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Chicago - Any increase in demand for treatment ol sanitary and storm sewage associated with the Area can be addressed by the existing treatment facilities currently in place. Therefore, no assistance is proposed for this district.
Board of Education ofthe City of Chicago - It is expected that no additional students will be generated in the area. Therefore no special assistance is proposed for this taxing district.
Chicago Park District - Given the expected increase for demand for Park District services associated with the Area, the City can seek to support the Chicago Park District in securing funding commitments toward the improvement needed in Gompers Park.
Foster/Ellens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project - September 2(), 2017, Revised December /'), 2017
City of Ch icago Redevelopment Plan and Project
Ciiy of Chicago - ll is expected that the increase in demand for City services and programs associated with the Area can be adequately addressed by existing City staff, police, fire protection, sanitary collection, and recycling services currently operated and maintained by the City. Therefore, no special assistance is proposed for this taxing district.
However, during the life of this Area, the City does recognize that the implementation ofthe Plan may have greater impact on the City and other taxing districts than currently anticipated. Given the anticipated scope, liming, and future changes in the market conditions, it is difficult to estimate with any degree of certainty what these impacts may be, if any. However, the City will work with the taxing districts to provide the increase in necessary programs and services including, but not limited to. reasonable measures in any redevelopment agreements entered into with any developers or other entities to mitigate such fiscal impacts. Actions by the City may-include, but are not limited to. the following:
Entering into redevelopment agreements or intergovernmental agreements with private entities or public entities to construct, rehabilitate, icnovaic 01 I'esioie piivaie or public improvements on one or several parcels (coiieenveiv referred to as "Redevelopment
Pi ojects ).
Establishing a Special Service Area to provide additional funds, solely from new development, to mitigate increased burden on the taxing districts.
Establishing special assessments to support City obligations.
The City may do all or none of these actions as determined solely by the appropriate City officials and City Council.
Foster/Edens Tux Increment Financing Redevelopment Area Flan and Project - September 29, 201 7, Revised December I <), 201 7
24
City of Chicago Redevelopment Plan and Project
XI. CONCLUSIONS
The following statements summarize the Plan:
The Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development.
Without the establishment of a redevelopment project area and the use of tax increment financing, the Area is not likely to experience significant growth or private development.
Implementation of the Plan will meet the City's long-term development objectives, eliminate the blighting conditions which exist in the Area, and enhance the morals, safety, and welfare ofthe City.
Foster/Eitens Fax Increment Financing Redevelopment \rea Plan and Project - September 29, 2017. Revised December 19, 2017
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing
September 29,2017
City of Chicago Rahm Emanuel, Mayor
Department of Planning and Development David L. Reifman, Commissioner
City of C hicago Eligibility Report
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BASIS FOR REDEVELOPMENT
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
ELIGIBILITY OF A BLIGIlTED AREA
FINDINGS
Appendix
Appendix Table 1 - Parcel Numbers, and estimated 2016 Equalized Assessed Value
Legal Description and Boundary Map ofthe Area
Map 1 - Boundary Map of the Area
Map 2 - Existing Land Uses
Map 3 - Proposed Land Uses
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 2'K 2017
City <>J Chicago Eligibility Report
Executive Summitry
Purpose of Report
Laube Consulting Group LLC (the "Consultant") has been engaged to prepare this Eligibility Report of a Proposed Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area (the "Report") for tax increment allocation financing for the proposed Foster/Edens Redevelopment Project Area (the "Area") in order to assist the City of Chicago (the "City") in determining whether or not this area ofthe City qualifies for designation as a redevelopment project area under the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/1 1 -7-1.4-1 et. seq.) (the "Act"). This report summarizes the analyses and Findings ofthe Consultant's work, which is the responsibility ofthe Consultant. The Consultant has prepared this report with the understanding that the City would rely". 1) on the findings and conclusions of this report in proceeding with the designation ofthe Area as a redevelopment project area under the Act, and 2) on the fact that the Consultant has obtained the necessary information to conclude that the Area can. be designated as a redevelopment project area in compliance with the Act.
Scope of Report
The Report identifies proposed boundaries ofthe proposed Area which were developed based on the existence of certain blighting factors present in the Area. The Report establishes the blighting factors which are present in the Area on a parcel by parcel basis. To establish the fact that the blighting factors are geographically distributed across the proposed Area, Appendix Table 1, which is included in the Appendix, illustrates the presence of blighting factors on a per parcel basis for the vacant parcels that are located within the Area.
Methodology
The Consultant conducted various surveys during July and August 201 7, within the Area, of existing conditions and land uses. In conducting these surveys, the Area conditions were documented and tabulated by the types of blighting factors delineated in the Act. An analy sis was made of each ofthe blighting factors to determine the locations and extent to which each of the factors is present in the Area. Listed below are the types of surveys and analyses conducted by the Consultant.
Exterior survey ofthe condition ofthe area;
Analysis of current parcel configurations, sizes and layouts;
Site survey of streets, driveways, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, lighting, parking, landscaping, fences and walls, and general properly maintenance: and
Analysis of real estate property values for all tax parcels within the Area for years
201 I - 2016.
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
Based on the above surveys and analyses and through the application ofthe language ofthe Act, the Consultant was able to determine which blighting factors were applicable to (he various parcels within the Area.
Findings Under the Act
As delineated in the Act, an improved Area must exhibit at least 5 of 13 possible blighting factors in order to qualify as an improved "blighted area" for designation as a redevelopment project area. The improved parcels in the Area exhibited 9 of 13 blighting factors. Specifically, the parcels exhibited 8 factors to a major extent and 1 to a limited extent. Based on our findings, the Consultant believes that the subject parcels (as hereinafter defined) qualify for designation as a blighted area under the Act.
Additionally, a vacant blighted area must have at least 1 of 7 possible blighting factors in order to qualify as a blighted area. The vacant parcels exhibited 3 out of 7 blighting factors. Specifically the factors are obsolete platting, environmental clean-up costs, and declining EAV (collectively comprising 1 factor under the Act), unused rail, and unused disposal site.
In summary, the Consultant believes the Area, based upon the criteria delineated in the Act, ¦ qualifies for eligibility as a "blighted area" under the Act. However, the ultimate responsibility for designation lies with the City. The purpose of this report is to assist the City in the decision process of establishing a redevelopment project area as defined by the Act.
II. Basis for Redevelopment
As set forth in the Act, the Illinois General Assembly has determined that in order to promote and protectthe health, safety, morals, and welfare of the public, blighted conditions within Illinois need to be eradicated. The Act also states that the eradication of these blighted conditions is essential to the public interest and that the use of tax incremental revenues to fund certain projects designed to do so benefits the community.
Prior to adopting an ordinance authorizing the use of tax increment financing under the Act for a proposed redevelopment area, certain statutory requirements must be met. One ofthe requirements is that the municipality must demonstrate that the proposed redevelopment area qualifies as a "blighted area". In this case, the Consultant has documented the statutory blighting factors under the Act. To designate the Area as a blighted area, the City must determine the following:
five or more blighting criteria are present in the Area for an improved parcel of land. (65 ILCS 5/1 1-74.4-3).
One or more blighting criteria are present in the Area for the vacant parcels of land. (65 ILCS 5/1 1-74.4-3).
I'ostcr/lulnns Tux Increment Einuncing Eligibility Report - September 29, 21)17
C iiy of Chicago Eligibility Report
The Area on (he whole has not been subject to growth and development through private investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be redeveloped without the adoption ofthe Plan. (65 IPCS 5/1 1-74.4-3)
T he Area would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the use of incremental property ta.\ revenues through tax increment financing.
T he following statements provide the legislative basis for tax increment financing in Illinois:
The existence of blighted areas or areas close to being blighted threatens the sound growth ofthe tax base and negatively impacts the welfare ofthe public. In addition, the welfare ofthe public would be enhanced through the development of blighled areas.
The blighting conditions in the Area need to be eradicated, conservation measures instituted, and redevelopment of blighted areas undertaken to alleviate these blighting conditions. The alleviation of blight thromjh development is essentia! to the public interest.
T he Area should be developed or redeveloped through the use of incremental property tax revenues derived from lax rales of other taxing districts located in the Area. Taxing districts in the Area would not derive the benefits of an increased assessment base without the benefits of tax increment financing. All taxing districts benefit from the removal of blighting conditions.
It is necessary to eliminate these blighting conditions for private development to take place.
/• Oster/iult'tis /V/.v hicreine.ot I'itiaticing Eligibility Report ¦ September 29, 2tlI 7 3(1
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
III. Redevelopment Project Area
The Area encompasses approximately 232 acres of land in the City including the public rights-of-way. The Area generally encompasses the Cook County Forest Preserve area to the north, Gompers Park to the east, the Eiston Avenue and Lawrence Avenue commercial corridors front approximately Kilbourn Avenue (to the east) to the Edens expressway (to the east), and the former Sunstar manufacturing property on the corner of Foster Avenue and the Edens. (Please see legal description and boundary map in the Appendix.)
Blighting Conditions
The Consultant visited the Area during July and August 2017 to ascertain the physical condition of properties and infrastructure located within the Area. The Consultant also gathered and reviewed various data from the City and County associated with the parcels located within the Area.
Based on the Consultant's review ofthe Area, the Consultant believes that a sufficient basis exists for the identification of a blighted area and establishment of a redevelopment project area at this location under the Act.
Specifically, under the Act, the improved parcels within the Area exhibited 8 of 13 blighting factors necessary to identify a blighted area and the vacant parcels exhibited 3 of 7 blighting factors. It is the Consultant's conclusion that the blight is evenly distributed to a reasonable and sufficient extent throughout the Area.
Foster/Edens Fox Increment Financing Eligibility Report September 2'K 2017
City of Cli icago Eligibility Report
IV. Eligibility of si Blighted Area Under the Act
A blighted area can be either improved or vacant. If the area is improved (e.g with industrial, commercial, or residential buildings or improvements), a finding may be made that the area is blighted because ofthe presence of a combination of five or more ofthe following thirteen factors: (65 ll.CS 5/1 1-74.4-3).
Dilapidation
Obsolescence
Deterioration
Presence of structures below minimum code standards
illegal use ol individual structures
i:\cessive vacancies
Lack of ventilation, light, or sanitary facilities
Inadequate utilities
Excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities
Deleterious land-use or layout
1 1. Environmental clean-up
12 Lack of community planning
13. The total EAV ofthe proposed redevelopment project area has declined 3 of the last 5
vears.
IOster/Fdens 'Tux Increment Financing Eligibility Report — September 29, 2!!! 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
If the area is vacant (e.g., without building improvements), a finding may be made that the area is blighted because ofthe presence of a combination of one or more ofthe following thirteen factors: (65 ILCS 5/1 1-74.4-3).
If the area is vacant (e.g. properly without industrial, commercial, and residential buildings which has not been used for commercial or agricultural purposes within 5 years prior to the designation ofthe project area), a finding may be made that the area is impaired by a combination of two or more ofthe six following sub-factors:
Obsolete platting of vacant land that results in parcels of limited or narrow size or configurations of parcels of irregular size or shape that would be difficult to develop on a planned basis and in a manner compatible with contemporary standards and requirements, or platting that failed to create rights-of-ways for streets or alleys or that created inadequate rights-of-way widths for streets, alleys, or other public rights-of-way or that omitted easements for public utilities.
Diversity of ownership of parcels of vacant land sufficient in number to retard or impede the ability to assemble the land for development.
Tax and special assessment delinquencies exist or the property has been the subject of tax sales under the Property Tax Code within the last 5 years.
Deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring areas ad jacent to the vacant land.
The area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for. the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by Slate or federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area.
The total equalized assessed value ofthe proposed redevelopment project area has declined for 3 ofthe last 5 calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance ofthe municipality for 3 ofthe last 5 calendar years for which information is available or is increasing at an annual rale that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United Slates Department of Labor or successor agency for 3 ofthe last 5 calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated.
The area consists of one or more unused quarries, mines, or strip mine ponds:
I'oster/lulens Tax Increment f inancing Eligibility Report - September 2'K 2017
City of Chicago Eligihility Kepoi l
5. The area consists ol'unused rail yards, rail tracks, or railroad right-of-way;
-I. The area prior to its designation, is subject to chronic Hooding that adversely impacts on real property in the area which is included in or (is) in proximity to any improvement on real property which lias been in existence for at least 5 years and which substantially contributes tii such Hooding;
The area consists of an unused or illegal disposal site, containing earth, stone, building debris or similar material, which was removed from construction, demolition, excavation or dredge sites;
T he area is not less than 50 nor more than 100 acres, and 75% of which is vacant, notwithstanding the fact that such area has been used for commercial agricultural purposes vvitiiiii :i years prior to the designation ofthe redevelopment project area, and which area meets at least one ofthe factors itemized in the Act. and the area has been designated as a town or village center by ordinance or comprehensive plan adopted prior to January 1, 1082, and the aiea has uoi been developed ior thai purpose:
7. ! he area qualified as a blighted improved area immediately prior to becoming vacant.
Toster/l'.ilen\ Tax Increment l intmci!'.'^ ILHgihilitv Report — September 2'), 201 7
City of Chicago Elii>ihility Report
Each blighting factor is rated on one ofthe three following categories:
Indicates that no information was available or that no evidence could be documented as part ofthe various survevs and analyses.
Indicates that conditions exist which document that the factor is present, but the distribution of impact
ofthe blighting condition is limited.
Indicates that conditions exist which document that
the factor is present throughout a major portion of
the proposed Area and the presence ol such
conditions have an influence on adjacent and nearby
development.
The following is a summary evaluation ofthe respective factors, presented in the order of their listing in the Act. A definition ol each category is presented followed by the conditions that exist and the relative extend to which each factor is present.
imi'kon i n blighted area
!. Dilapidation
Dilapidation refers to an advanced state of disrepair of buildings or improvements or the neglect of necessary repair, suffering the building or improvements to fall into a state of decay. Dilapidation as a factor, then, should be based upon the documented presence and reasonable distribution of buildings and improvements that are in an advanced state of disrepair. Reasonable and defensible criteria should be developed to be used in determining the comparative quality of all buildings and improvements in the proposed project area, including a specific showing of those found in an advanced state of disrepair.
Building components examined were of two types:
Basic Structural - Includes the basic elements of a building: foundation walls, load bearing walls and columns. Iloor structure, roof and roof structure.
Structural Components - Includes normal additions to structures such as porches and steps, window and window units, doors and door units, chimneys, and gutters and dow nspouts.
Overall Conclusion - Present to a Limited Extent
The bridges and overpasses in the Area are severely dilapidated. They exhibit severely cracking structural concrete down to where the rebar is showing. The rebar is severely rusted and the pylons are severely water damaged. The sides ofthe tunnel walls have large portions of missing concrete and have large holes in them.
I oster/lidens l ax Increment I'iuaining Eligibility Report -- September 29, 2(1! 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
V. Findings From (lie Eligibility Survey and Analysis Under the Act
An analysis was made of each ofthe blighting factors listed in the Act to determine whether each or any are present in the Area and, if so, to w hat extent and in what locations. Surveys and analyses within the Area included:
Survey ofthe condition ofthe parcels;
Field survey of conditions of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighting, parking facilit ies, landscaping, fences and walls, and general property maintenance;
Analysis of existing uses and (heir relationships to neighboring properties: and
Site coverage.
I he following parcels represent vacant parcels and were evaluated under the vacant land blighting criteria:
13-09-205-003
13-09-010-001
]3-10-200-003
13-10-200-006
13-10-404-001
13-10-404-005
13-10-302-016
13-10-302-017
All other parcels listed in the Appendix are considered improved parcels for purposes of this Report and were evaluated under the improved parcel blighting criteria.
Fostcr/F.ilens Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 201 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
2. Obsolescence
Obsolete buildings are characterized by conditions indicating that they are not readily adaptable for modern uses. In this case, the buildings are evaluated based on modern industry standards.
Obsolescence can be broken into the following two categories.
Functional Obsolescence
Functional obsolescence occurs when buildings can no longer perform their intended function in an efficient manner. For example, buildings are obsolete when they contain characteristics or deficiencies which limit the use and marketability of such buildings. In manufacturing for example, buildings may become obsolete over time due to changes in manufacturing methods or changes in industry standards.
Economic Obsolescence
Economic obsolescence occurs when the values of buildings decline due to market conditions, vacancies, neighborhood decline, properly location within a community, or other factors which affect the economic value of buildings. These factors are generally beyond the owners' control.
Site improvements, including sewer and water lines, public utility lines (i.e., gas, electric and telephone), parking areas, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and lighting may also evidence obsolescence in terms of their relationship to contemporary development standards for such improvements.
Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
The buildings in the Area demonstrate economic obsolescence. The results of our analysis indicate that the majority ofthe parcels demonstrate obsolescence to a major extent. •
Improved Parcels - These parcels demonstrate both functional and economic obsolescence to a major extent.
Economic Obsolescence - There is some first floor commercial vacancy along these corridors. Manx of these buildings were built to a standard of a previous era reflected in the economic opportunity. Additionally, the industrial buildings along Kimberly and Kenton lack appropriate access and arc very land locked and narrow. To bring them to today's standards and into modern productive use would take a complete renovation ofthe buildings and reconfiguration of the parcels and commercial depths along these streets.
Foster/Edens Fax Increment Financing Eligibility Report September 29, 2017
City of Ch icago Eligibility Report
functional Obsolescence - The ingress/egress to vehicular traffic to the site is along Eiston and Lawrence and is very narrow. Additionally, the ingress/egress to the industrial buildings along Kenton and Kimberly is very narrow . There is truck and other commercial vehicle stacking along these roads causing congestion and road blockages at limes. The loading areas are generally accessed along the streets and are difficult to be accessed by modern trucks and delivery vehicles. Additionally, the layout of these building, the veritable "hodge podge" of building types and uses, and the era of construction does not lend itself towards an adaptive reuse that has market
.i.: i:<. v iiu'i 111 y.
As a result, the economic value of these buildings in their current state has declined significantly over their original use. Therefore, these parcels demonstrate both functional and economic obsolescence to a major extent.
3. Deterioration
Deterioration relers to any physical deficiencies or disrepair iii buildings oi site iiiipiovemt-nis requiring treatment or repair. I his would include buildings with major defects in the secondary building components (e.g., doors, windows, porches, gutters and downspouts, fascia materials, etc.), and major defects in primary building components (e.g., foundations, frames, roofs, etc.).
The condition of roadways, alleys, curbs gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking and surface areas may also evidence deterioration, as well as surface cracking, crumbling, potholes, depressions, loose paving materials, weeds/grasses protruding through the concrete and asphalt surfaces, and conditions of genera! property maintenance.
Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
Improved Parcels - Ofthe 83 buildings within the Area, 77, or 92% of them exhibit deterioration. The Consultant catalogued deterioration that included major defects in building components, including collapsed or missing gutters, broken windows, evidence of water damage on the sides ofthe buildings and/or roof leaks, building foundations cracking, missing tuck-pointing, cracked exterior wall surfaces, cracked sidewalks, cracked parking lots, overgrown weeds, cracked curbs and gutters, surface damage to parkways, severely deteriorated bridged and concrete mull ions, cracked and concrete in the alleys. These are conditions that are not readily correctable through normal maintenance. This type of deterioration is very indicative of an area that has lacked investment and is blighted.
Therefore, deterioration is present to a major extent.
t oster/Iiilens Tax Increment financing Eligibility Report - .September 29, 201 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
4. Presence ol structures below miniinuni code standards
This includes all structures which do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, housing, property maintenance, lire, or other governmental codes applicable to the property. The principal purposes of such codes are to require building to be constructed in such a way as to sustain the safety of certain loads expected from these types of occupancy, to be safe for occupancy against fire and similar hazards, and to establish minimum standards essential for safe and sanitary habitation. Structures below minimum code standards are characterized by defects or deficiencies, which threaten the health and safety of its inhabitants.
Conclusion - Not Present
5. Illegal Use of Individual Structures
fins factor applies to the use of structures in violation of applicable national, state, or local laws, and not to legal, nonconforming uses. Some examples of such illegal use include the conduct of any illegal vice activities such as drug manufacture or dealing and prostitution sale, or uses in violation of national, state, or local environmental and occupational safety and health regulations.
Conclusion — Not Present
Excessive Vacancies
This refers to the presence of buildings or sites which are unoccupied or underutilized and which represent an adverse influence on the area because ofthe frequency, extent, or duration of such vacancies, ll includes properties which evidence no apparent effort directed toward their occupancy utilization and vacancies within buildings.
Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
Improved Parcels - There are 83 buildings within these commercial corridors. Eleven buildings exhibit vacancies. Nine ofthe I I vacancies are vacant commercial store fronts along the street level and 2 buildings are completely vacant. That means that 13.25% of all buildings in the improved area exhibit excessive vacancy. T herefore, this is present to a major extent.
Lack of ventilation, light, or sanitary facilities
This refers to substandard conditions which adversely affect the health and welfare of building occupants, (e.g., residents, employees, or visitors.)
Conclusion — Not Present
1 oster/Fdens lux Increment Financing Eligibility Report — September 29, 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Iteport
8. Inadequate utilities
This refers to deficiencies in the capacity or condition of all overhead and underground utilities including, but not limited to, storm drainage, water supply, electrical power, telephone, sanitary sewers, gas, and electricity. Inadequate utilities include those which are:
of sufficient capacity to serve the uses in the redevelopment project and surrounding
deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete, or in disrepair, or
lacking.
Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
Entire Area - Accordmn, to data provided bv the C ity the under"round utilities particularly the
water mains and sewer lines, have reached the end of their 100-year useful service lives.
Adii11ii)n;iiiv ciiiii'i' additions and replacements a.re needed to the water mains and se^er tines due
|("\ MKiiftii'ipnt c i /i1 In I'iMlinlv w/illi m*wl(>rn (w.> rv.w it\- ri-vitiin>nion(t'
" "I". v.......
Due to the age and condition ofthe water and sewer lines, inadequate utilities were found to be present to a major extent on these parcels.
9. Excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities
This refers to the over-intensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities to the site. Problem conditions include buildings either improperly situated on the parcel or located on parcels of inadequate size and shape in relation to present-day standards of development for health and safety, and multiple buildings on a single parcel.
Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
Improved Parcels - The size, shape, and configuration of these parcels are irregular and lack a coordinated planning effort. The building configuration on the parcels along these improved commercial corridors is irregular in that the building separations are sometimes non-existent, with back to back buildings and, in other cases, the building separations are quite large. The buildings were built without a coordinated planning effort and were done on a piecemeal basis, leading to such irregularities, lack of configuration and overcrowding of structures. This overcrowding of structures creates difficulties with commercial ingress and egress to the buildings, parking access for customers, problems with general traffic patterns and congestion on Lawrence and Eiston Avenues.
Eoster/Edens Tux Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
10. Deleterious Land-Use or Layout
This includes evidence of incompatible land-use relating to the mix of building types, improper platting, inadequate street system, parcels of irregular size or shape, or improper layout ofthe buildings.
Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
Improved Parcels - This size, shape, and configuration of these parcels are irregular and lack a coordinated planning effort. The building configuration on the parcels along these improved commercial corridors is irregular in that the building separations are sometimes non-existent, with back to back buildings and, in other cases, the building separations are quite large. The buildings were built without a coordinated planning effort and done on a piecemeal basis leading to such irregularities, lack of configuration and overcrowding of structures. Additionally, residential homes anil apartments are crowded in between older commercial buildings, and uses such as auto body repair shops are immediately adjacent to residential uses. This mix of uses and overcrowding of structures creates difficulties with commercial ingress and egress to the buildings, parking access for customers, problems with general traffic patterns and congestion on Lawrence and Eiston Avenues.
Foster/Edens Tux Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
Environmental clean-up
This refers to the remediation costs incurred for, or studies conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation, has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or f ederal Law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment ofthe redevelopment project area.
Conclusion - Not Present
Lack of community planning
This indicates the area as a whole was 'developed without the benefit or guidance of overall
i-i m 1111 11111 i »_v \i in i ii 111i ^ i i i v '.n vi 11 ii_ \Ji i.' j / V. I ll^.S I'V 1111111 Mil, [ \ I 1~developed on a parcel-by-parcel and building-by-building basis with little evidence of
pOi M'/1111:11 mil ;nlii 11 In1111 I n 11 '.imrin.i Ii 11 I I < I M111 c: '.inci !ifM ii'itipi' 1 liii i'l/^L- nl ^i-iMiiminih: i,i.mninn -it
- I.T-" .— l. • ...... . . .~ ll.~.V I.,. ........ I.. I . (/.Ill I lllllj .H
iii., nii'tii .n.;.,;,,.,i ,i,.,i ;.- .^r„,,.,„i <¦„<,,,. ,u;„i, u ,,,...:u ,.i ... .1...
1 1 i-_ li'lli— '-l 1:1^ l 'I : w,l I 1(1 I 1. I V. 1 \* I v. j .! I It. I I L 1.1 l.'JIl. \] 1 .-1V.VLI1II iUC IU1 .1 VI I 1 I I 1 I I Cl V C U 11 U I I ? ll LC U Li'' i I IV.
problem conditions previously cited. Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
Improved Parcels - Although the development of this type of commercial along arterial street boundaries may have coincided with the community planning in a previous era, the total Area lacks coordination with the land uses within the Area. Presidential single family homes exist next to auto body shops and other commercial uses. The residential single family homes are sandwiched in between commercial uses with very narrow side separations between the buildings. Larger industrial and institutional buildings are located next to wood construction sandw ich shops and restaurants. They are not coordinated in any way witli past or current planning efforts Therefore, the lack of community planning is a blighting factor throughout the Area present to a major extent.
Foster/Edens lax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 201 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
13. The total equalized assessed value ofthe proposed redevelopment area has declined 3 ol' the last 5 years
The total equalized assessed value ofthe proposed Area has declined for three ofthe last five calendar years prior to the year in which the Area is proposed to be designated or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance ofthe municipality for three ofthe last five calendar years for which information is available or is increasing at an annual rate less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three ofthe last live calendar years prior to the year in which the Area is proposed to be designated.
Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Total LAV of All Improved Parcels
$ $ $ $ $ $
28,073,542 25,778,765 24,834,534 23,870,472 26,504,980 24,257,455
Change -8.17% -3.66% -3.88% '11.04% -8.48%
The EAV ofthe improved parcels in the Area has declined 4 of the last 5 years. Summary of Findings
The conditions in the Area as a whole demonstrate that the Area has not been subject to growth and development through private investment. Under the Act, three of the seven blighting factors, or three ofthe first six and two of the second six blighting factors, were found to be present in the vacant parcel in the boundary ofthe Area. The most frequent conditions were:
Dilapidation
Deterioration
Obsolescence
Excessive Vacancies
Inadequate Utilities
Deleterious Land Use
Excessive Land Coverage
Lack of Community Planning
Declining EAV
Unless corrected, these conditions will persist and continue to delay future economic development in the Area.
Through the establishment ofthe Area and the use of tax increment financing, the City will be able to address the blighting factors that are present throughout the Area and promote development in the Area.
Foster/L'dens Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 201 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
Vacant Blighted Area
VACANT LAND FACTOR I - Combination of Two Factors
A combination oflwo or more ofthe following factors: obsolete platting ofthe vacant land, diversity of ownership of such land, tax and special assessment delinquencies on such land, deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring area adjacent to the vacant land, existence of remediation costs incurred due to Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency standards, the decline ofthe equalized assessed value ofthe properly for 3 ofthe last 5 calendar year prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area was designated.
A. Analysis of Obsolete Platting
The vacant parcels in their current configurations exhibit irregular sizes and shapes that will make it difficult to develop the Area in a manner ihai is compatible with contemporary standards and requirements.
The American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers defines obsolescence as follows: "One ofthe causes of depreciation. An impairment of desirability and usefulness caused by new inventions, current changes in design, improved processes for production, or external factors that make a property less desirable and valuable for a continued use; may be either functional or external [economical]."
Real estate development is driven by the highest and best use of a property at the time the property is developed. Over time, changes in technology, design, and economics may alter the highest and best use of a property causing it to become functionally or economically obsolete. Obsolescence has an overall blighting effect on the surrounding area, detracting from the desirabililv ofthe overall area.
Conclusion lor Obsolete Platting - Present to a Major Extent
The lack of interior access roads and the current parcel configuration make it difficult to accommodate multiple users or the development plans that are in conformance with the planning efforts ofthe City. The configuration was conducive to a manufacturing plant and is not practical for contemporary development standards or standards associated with the Plan for the Area as proposed by the City. The Area's configuration, lay-out, and lack of access roads and other basic infrastructure make it obsolete by modern-day standards and create a material and serious impediment to development on the site.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment I inanring Eligibility Report
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
1$. Analysis of Diversity of Ownership
All parcels are currently owned bv one entity.
Conclusion for Diversity of Ownership - Not Present
Analysis of Tax and Special Assessment Delinquencies Exist
All taxes and assessments are currently up to date with respect to payment.
Conclusion for Tax and Special Assessment Delinquencies - Not Present
Analysis of Deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring areas Conclusion for Deterioration of Structures in Neighboring Areas - Not Present
E. Analysis of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs
incurred
1. Historical Environmental Investigations and Remediation Activities Conducted by historic owners in the Area
The analysis ofthe soil samples revealed that levels of toxic materials were exceeded in the following areas: benzene, toluene, ethylbenz.ene, xylene, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, arsenic barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, lead and total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons.
The analytically results indicated that various PNA compounds and/or chromium were detected at concentrations exceeding it most current stringent Tier 1 SRO's. In addition, several VOC's were identified above Tier 1 SRO's in the soil samples taken. The concentration of 1.1,1-trichloroethlane detected in this sample exceeds the default soil saturation limit for this chemical and the total sum VOC's and concentration of TRPH exceed the default soil attenuation capacity for subsurface soil.
'The cost of remediation is significant. Conclusion- Present to a Major Extent
i
Eoster/Etlens Tax Increment Einancing Eligibility Report - September 29, 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
F. The total equalized assessed value ofthe proposed redevelopment project area has declined fori ofthe last 5 calendar years
Analysis - ITte percentage in the Area EAV has increased more than the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index and the percentage increase in the overall EAV for the City for the past 3 of 5 years
Conclusion - Present to a Major Extent
Total AV of Vacant Parcels
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
S $ $ $ $ $
1.570,400 1,465,602 1,465,602 1,465,602 1,556,743 812,873
2.6621 2.7253 2.6685
Total EAV of All Vacant Parcels
S S|99|5 $
4,605.208 4,111,893 3,901,579 3,994,205 4,154,169 2,278,646
Change
Analysis - The EAV of the Vacant Parcels have declined the last 3 of 5 years.
Overall Conclusion for Vacant Land Blighting Factor 1 - Because three (3) of the sub-factors are present and evenly distributed throughout all parcels in the Area, this blighting factor is established as present for all the vacant parcels.
VACANT 1 .AND VAC I OR 2 - Unused Quarries or Mines
T he area consists of one or more unused quarries, mines, or strip mine ponds
Analysis
There are no quarries, mines, or strip mind ponds present.
Conclusion for Vacant Land Blighting Factor 2 - Not Present
i
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
VACANT LAN11.) CRITERIA 3 - Unused Rail
The area consists of unused rail yards, rail tracks, or railroad right-of-way. Analysis
1 here is an unused rail spur along the northern portion ofthe Area which goes into the Area approximately 400 feet. This rail spur must be removed as part of the site preparation/ environmental remediation plan.
Conclusion for Vacant Laud Blighting Factor 3 — Present to a Major Extent.
VACANT LAND FACTOR 4 - Chronic Flooding
The Area prior to its designation is subject to chronic flooding that adversely impacts on real property in the Area which is included in or (is) in proximity to any improvement on real property which has been in existence for at least 5 years and which substantially contributes to such Hooding.
Conclusion for Vacant Land Blighting Factor 4 - Not Present
VACANT LAND FACT OR 5 - Unused Disposal Site
The Area consists of an unused or illegal disposal site, as defined by the Act, containing earth, stone, building debris or similar material, which were removed from construction, demolition, excavation or dredge sites.
Conclusion for Vacant Land Building Factor 5 - Present to a Limited Extent Analysis
T he vacant parcels were once the former Sunstar manufacturing facility. All the buildings and structures have been demolished and all the building material strewn on the site. The site has piles of bricks and broken stone. It has large blocks of steel reinforced concrete dumped on it with the steel rebar sticking out. There are large broken blocks of asphalt strewn in piles on the site. The site is currently covered by approximately 5 feet of construction debris on average.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
VAC A XI LAND |;/\CTp R 6 - Vacancy
The Area is noi less llian 50 nor more than 100 acres, and 75% ol'which is vacant, notwithstanding the fact that such area has been used lor commercial agricultural purposed within 5 years prior to the designation of the Area, and which Area meets at least one ofthe factors itemized in the Act. and the area has been designated as a town or village center by ordinance or comprehensive plan adopted prior to January I, 1982, and the Area has not been developed for that purpose.
Analysis
This is a former heavy industrial site and not a town center.
Conclusion — Not Present VACANT LAND I ACTOR 7 - Former Improved Bliuhled Area
Analysis
Because the structures were largely demolished recently, the Consultant is unable to determine the existence of this criterion. No conclusive data to this effect is currently available.
Conclusion — Not Present r
OVERALL CONCLUSION FOR THE VACANT PARCELS
The vacant parcel clearlv demonstrated three (3) ofthe seven (7) blighting factors delineated for vacant parcels in the Act. The Area exhibited three sub-criteria, resulting in meeting the first factor, and two additional factors, totaling three ofthe seven blighting factors. Since only one (I) of seven (7) is necessary or two (2) ofthe first set of six (6) (considered Factor 1) or one (1) of a second set ol six (6). the vacant parcel qualifies as blighted under the Act.
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing
City oj Chicago Eligibility Report
APPENDIX Table 1 - Boundary Map
Foster/Edens l ux Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 2'J, 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Rcport
Table 2 - Existing Land Use Map
Foster/Edens Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 2'). 20! 7
City of Cli icago Eligibility Report
Table 3 - Proposed Land Use Map
Foster/Fdens Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 2017
OUT)
< O ¦;
a &.g
o S ¦ (D
° E1 a
D) 3
a C
(A
= &-
(A
o s
x|1010|2 c
D
"5 > O n?
o ~
IS
City of Chicago Lligihi/ity Report
Appendix Tattle 2
Redevelopment Area Parcel Numbers and Estimated 2016 EAV
2016 EAV
13-10-302 13-10-302 13-10-101-13-10-404-13-10-500-13- i 0-500-13-l().y99-i ',-(!<) ;:•;!;,
13-09-104 ¦ 13-09-40-1 13-09-404 13-09-404 13-09-404-13-09-404 13-09-404 13-09-404 13-09-401 13-09-40-1-] 3-09-40-1-13-09-404-13-09-404-13-09-404-13-09-404-13-09-404-I3-0<> 101 13-09-404-13-09-404-13-09-404-13-10-100-13-10-200-13-10-200-13-10-300-13-10-300-13-10-301-13-10-301-13-10-301-
S $
$ $ $ $ $ $ % $ S $
s $ s $ $ % $ s $ s $
$
s $
'S
$
375,582 437,291
124,442 43,712 56,643 19,334 27,661 35,897 27,608 12,999 27,969 27,720
40,421 30,849 29,502 171,491 127,985 26,036
36,283
0 0
34,981 23,097 25,296
$
s >s $
%
%
% $ % $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
$
$
$ $
% %
%
% $ % % % % $
1,052,831 1,225,814
348,83b 122,533 158,782 54,197 77,539 1.00,626 77,391 36,439 78,403 77,705
113,308 86,476 82,700 480,724 35S,768 72,984
101,709
0 0
98,059 64,746 70,910
I osier/lideiw Tax ! ncreiueat /in and a" fSIi^ibi'/Ifv Report — Septeniber
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
13-10-309-077
13-10-309-078
13-10-309-080
13-10-309-083
13-10-309-084
13-10-309-085
13-10-309-086
13-10-309-087
13-10-309-088
13-10-309-093
13-10-309-094
13-10-309-095
13-10-310-007
13-10-310-008
13-10-310-009
13-10-310-010
13-10-310-028
13-10-310-029
13-10-310-030
13-1.0-310-031
13-10-310-042
13-10-310-043
13-10-310-044
13-10-310-045
13-10-310-046
13-10-310-049
13-10-310-050
13-10-310-051
13-10-310-052
13-10-310-053
13-10-310-054
13-10-310-055
13-10-310-056
13-10-310-057
13-10-311-016
13-10-311-017
13-10-311-018
13-10-311-019
13-10-311-020
13-10-311-021
13-10-311-022
13-10-311-023
13-10-31 1-024
13-10-311-026
13-10-311 -027
S S $ $ $ $ $ $
S $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $
$ $ $ $
s s $
$ $ s s s $ $ $
$ s
$ $ $
$ $
26,572 53,760 12,266 67,032 67,032 44,849 36,848 35,519
39382 76,821 59,130 41,354 20,322 33,362 33,362 43,356 30,907 28,694 30,287 27,541 18,029 40,260 40,342 40,342 82,161 49,263 74,429 40,922 81,895 109,069|1010|34,187 29,494 163,534 51,126 48,685 12,534 12,623 22,679 13,181 12,648 11,970 11,006 51,976 32,455
$ $
s s
$
$
$
$
s
s
$
$'
$
$
$ $
$
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ s $ $ $ s $ $ $ $ s $ $ $ s $ $ $ s
74,487 150,700 34,384 187,904 187,904 125,721 103,292 99,567 110,396 215,345 165,753 115,924 56,967 93,520 93,520 121,536 86,639 80,435 84,901 77,203 50,539 112,857 113,087 113,087 230,314 ' 138,094 208,639 114,713 229,568 305,742|1010|95,833 82,678 458,419 143,316 136,474 35,135 35,385 63,574 36,949 35,455 33,554 30,852 145,699 90,978
iosier/Edens Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 201 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
-301-004 -301 -003 -301 -007 -301 -008 -301 -009 -301-010 -301-011 -301-012 -301-013 -301-014 ¦301-015 -301-016 -301-017 -30 i -020 -301 -021 -30 i -022 -301 -023 ¦301-024 -302-005 -302-009 -302-012 -302-018 -302-019 -302-020 -302-021 -308-013 -308-014 ¦308-015 ¦308-016 -308-017 -308-018 -308-022 -308-052 -308-058 -308-063 -309-001 -309-002 -309-003 .309-004 -309-005 -309-009 -309-010 ¦309-045 -309-051 -309-076
$ $
S $ $
s $ $ $ $
$
$
$ $
$ $ $ $ $ $
$ s s $ s
$ $ $
$ $
$ $ $
$ s
$ $
$ $
26,455 39,802 22,628 28,256 25,193 24,282 25,594 21,413 28,693 29,672 30,45S 28,019 20,050 1,365 2,038 2,038 18,804 29,461 246,748 585,427 422,256 77,719 227,497 374,423 85,803 56,119 18,454 24,878 15,356 28,010 42,407 111,023
98,308 16,608 50,175 24,599 23,226 23,226 23,699 8,218 8,218
1,972 27,130
S $ S $ $ $
s $ $ $ s $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ • $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ s
$ $ s s
74,159 111,573 63,431 79,207 70,621 68,067 71,745 60,025 80,432 83,177 85,380 78,543 56,204 3,826 5,713 5,713 52,711 82,585 691,684 ,641,069 ,183,668 217,862 637,720 ,049,583 240,523 157,313 51,730 69,738 43,046 78,518 118,875 311,220
275,577 46,556
140,651 68,956 65,107 65,107 66,433 23,037 23.037
5,528 76,051
l t>\lcr/f "item Tu.v Increment f inancing Eligibility Report — September 29, 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T HE AREA
Redevelopment Project Area.
ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 9, 10 AND 15 IN TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF TIIK THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DLSCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT I I IF POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF NORTH CICERO AVENUE WITH THE NOR I'l l LINE OF WEST FOSTER AVENUE;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF NOR I i i CICERO AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NOR TH LINE OF HAMILTON'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT I IN CALDWELL'S RESERVE:. BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 14 IN SAID SUBDIVISION;
THENCE: EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 14 IN HAMILTON'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 IN CALDWELL'S RESERVE, EXTENDED EAST, TO THE CI-INTER LINE OF THE NOR III BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER:
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF THE NORTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER TO THE WEST LINE OF THE WEST 11A LP OF LOT 20 IN RIVERS EDGE SUBDIVISION, BEING PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF' SECTION 10, SAID WEST LINE ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF EOT 26 IN SAID RIVERS EDGE SUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF;
THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF AFORESAID WEST HALF OF LOT 26 TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE NORTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE NORTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER TO THE WES T LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 26 IN SAID RIVERS EDGE SUBDIVISION.
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 26 TO THE SOU TH LINE THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 26 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 26 IN AFORESAID RIVERS EDGE SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST FOSTER AVENUE:
THENCE EAS T ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WES T FOSTER AVENUE TO THE WES T LINE OF NORTH PULASKI ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF NOR TH PULASKI ROAD TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NOR TH LINE OF LOT I IN THE SALVATION ARMY SUBDIVISION IN SAID SECTION 10, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH 300 FEET OF THE SOU I II 508 FEET OF THE EAST 3/4 HIS OF THE NORTHEAS T QUARTER OF" THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10;
Foster/Filens Tax Increment Financing Fligibility Report - September 29, 201 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
TTIENCI WEST ALONG SAIL) EASTERLY EXTENSION ANT.) ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT I IN THE SALVATION ARMY SUBDIVISION AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION TO THE WEST LINE OE NOR'I'I I KEDVALE AVENUE:
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OE NORTH KEDVALE AVENUE TO THE SOU TH LINE OF WEST CARMEN AVENUE.
THENCE WES T ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST CARMEN AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF NORTH KEELER AVENUE:
'IT IENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST' LINE OF NORTH KEELER AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST FOST ER AVENUE;
THENCE WEST' ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST FOSTER AVENUE TO THE NORT HWEST ERLY LINE OF LOT I IN DOT Y BROS. & GORDON'S ADDITION TO MONTROSE IN JAMES IT. RUES* SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER IN AFORESAID SECTION 10, SAID LINE ALSO BEING FITE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO AND NORTH
WEST!-v. K R A !! \VAV !-.' '.<¦! |T OF' WAY'
IT IENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY RIGHT' OF WAY TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT' I IN DOT Y BROS. & GORDON'S ADDIT ION TO MONTROSE, SAID WEST LINE ALSO BEING THE EAST" LINE OF NORTH KENTON AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST" LINE OF NORTH KENT ON AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST CARMEN AVENUE;
THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST CARMEN AVENUE TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF NORT H KIMBERLY AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG . THE SOUT HEAST ERLY LINE OF NOR TH KIMBERLY AVENUE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT" 156 IN AFORESAID DOTY BROS. & GORDON'S ADDI TION TO MONT ROSE. SAID LINE. ALSO BEING THE NORT HEASTERLY LINE OF T HE 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NORTHEAST OF NOR TH ELSTON AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTHEAST ALONG THE NOR ITT EASTERLY LINE OF SAID 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY T O T HE SOUTHEAST ERLY LINE OE NORTH KILBOURN AVENUE;
IT IENCE SOUT HWEST ALONG THE SOU THEASTERLY LINE OF NORTH KILBOURN AVENUE TO THE SOUT HWEST ERI.Y LINE OF LOT 14 IN LAWRENCE & ELSTON AVENUES SUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 (EXCEPT THE EAST 6.97 CHAINS) IN AFORESAID JAMES IT. REES" SUBDIVISION, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NORTHEAST OF NORTH ELST ON AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTHEAS T ALONG T HE NORT HEASTERLY LINE OF SAID 16 FOO T WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF NORTH GUNNISON ST REET:
IT IENCE SOUT HWEST ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF NORTH GUNNISON S TREE T TO T HE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF NORTH ELSTON AVENUE;
T HENCE SOUTHEAST' ALONG T HE NORT HEASTERLY LINE OF NORTH ELSTON AVENUE TO THE SOU TH LINE OF WEST" LAWRENCE AVENUE:
loster/Eilens lux Increment linnmitig Eli'^ibility Report — September 29, 20!?
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
I III ACT. WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OE WEST LAWRENCE AVENUE TO THE ( I Nil KLINE OE NORT H CICERO AVENUE.
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE CENTER LINE OE NORTH CICERO AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OE THE SOUTH LINE OE LOT 45 OE DOTY BROS. & GORDON'S SECOND ADDITION TO MA YEA IR. A SUBDIVISION OE LOT 9 OE JAMES IT. REES' SUBDIVISION, SAID SOUTH LINE: ALSO BEING HIE NORTH LINE OE THE FIRST 16 FOOT' WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NORT H OF WEST LAWRENCE AVENUE;
T HENCE EAS E ALONG SAID WEST ERLY EXT ENSION AND THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 45 OF AFORESAID DOT Y BROS. & GORDON'S SECOND ADDIT ION TO MAYFAIR, TO A POINT A DISTANCE OF i 28.7 FEET' EAS E OF T HE WEST' LINE OF SAID LOT 45;
I HENCE SOUT HEAST FROM A POINT I2S.7 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 45 TO THE SOUT HEAST ERLY LINE THEREOF, SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT' 45 ALSO BEING T HE NORTHWES'FEREY LINE OF NORTH KILPATRICK AVENUE:
THENCE NORTHEAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTH KILPATRICK AVENUE TO THE WEST ERLY EXT ENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF EOF 30 OF AFORESAID DOTY BROS & GORDON'S SECOND ADDITION TO MAYFAIR, SAID SOUTH LINE ALSO BEING THE NORT H LINE OF' THE FIRST 16 FOOT" WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NORTH OF WEST" LAWRENCE AVENUE:
THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 30 TO A POINT" ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 29 IN AFORESAID DOTY BROS. & GORDON'S SECOND ADDITION TO MAYFAIR AND A DISTANCE OF 78.3 FEET EAST OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF NORTH KILPATRICK AVENUE, SAID LINE BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE FIRST 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NORTH OF WEST LAWRENCE AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTHEAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 29 TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE THEREOF. SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE. OF T HE FIRST 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY WESTERLY OF KENTUCKY AVENUE;
THENCE NORTHEAST ALONG SAID FIRST 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY WESTERLY OF NORT H KENTUCKY AVENUE TO THE WESTERN EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE FIRST 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NORTH OE WEST' LAWRENCE AVENUE;
THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND THE NORTH LINE OF THE 16 FOOT" WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NORT H OF" WEST LAWRENCE AVENUE TO A POINT A DISTANCE OF 4.8 FEET SOUTHWEST OF IT IE NORTHEAST ERLY LINE OF LOT 9 IN MCGRANE'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 37 TO 41 IN MCGRANE'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT 10 OF JAMES H. REES" SUBDIVISION OE THE SOUTHWEST" QUART ER IN SECTION 10;
THENCE NORTHEAST FROM SAID POINT ON LOT" 9 A DISTANCE OF 4.8 FEET" TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE FIRST PUBLIC ALLEY SOUTHWEST OF NORTH ELSTON AVENUE;
THENCE NOR FIT WEST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE FIRST PUBLIC ALLEY SOUT HWEST OF NORTH ELSTON AVENUE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 17 IN ISAAC W. IIIGGS SUBDIVISION OE LOT" 8 OF JAMES IT. REES' SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUT HWEST QUART ER IN SECTION 10, SAID NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT' 17 ALSO BEING IT-IE SOUTHEAST LINE OE THE F IRST 20 FOOT' WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NORTHWEST OE NORTH KRUGER AVENUE:
Foster/Filcns Fax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 201 7
City of Chicago Eligibility Rcport
mi \(t: soi :th\\ est along the sol i i ii as i link or the first 20 foot widi: public
ALLEY NOR I TT WEST OF NORTH KRUGLR AV'LNi I. TO THL SOUTHEASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF LOT 16 IN AFORESAID ISAAC W. HiGGS" SUBDIVISION:
THENCE NORTHWEST ALONG SAID SOUTHEAST ERLY EXT ENSION AND THE SOUTHWEST' LINE OE SAID EOF 16 TO T HE POINT' OF INTERSECTTON WI TH T HE WEST ERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY RIGHT' OF WAY;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WES TERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO AND NOR TH WESTERN RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE VACATED PARCEL OF PROPERTY BEARING PIN 13-10-308-063;-
THENCE SOUTHEAST ALONG SAID SOU III WESTERLY LINE OF THE VACATED PARCEL TO THE SOI 11 IE AS F LINE THEREOF:
THENCE NORTHEAST ALONG SAID SOUT HEAST' LINE OF AFORESAID VACATED PARCEL "TO Fill sol I I !\\ EST LINE OF NORTH ELS'I'ON AVENUE:
i HENCE NORTHWEST' ALONG THE SOUTT I WEST LINE OF NORTH ELSTON AVENUE TO THE
i. NiTFT i"> 1 IMF' \i( '\DTLI /"' i ("" (7 p ( ~\ \ "wCN-" ' [.;
V I ¦ N I I.IM.IIVI \' I iNVM\ 1 i i 1 «^- i., \\ \.t f\ v i_, i \ i_
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF" NOR FIT CICERO AVENUE TO THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH ELSTON AVENUE;
THENCE NORTHWEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH ELSTON AVENUE TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF NORTH LACROSSE AVENUE;
THENCE NORT H ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE WEST LINE OF NORTH LACROSSE AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN MATHILDA OITLSON"S SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHEAST' QUARTER OF SECTION 9, SAID , SOUTH LINE ALSO BEING I HE NORT H LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY NOR TH OF NORTH ELST ON AVENUE:
THENCE EAST' ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND T HE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN MAT HILDA OHLSON'S SUBDIVISION TO IT IE EAST LINE "THEREOF, SAID EAST' LINE ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF THE FIRST" 16 FOOT' WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY WEST' OF NORTH CICERO AVENUE;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE FIRST 16 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC ALLEY WEST OT" NORTT I CICERO AVENUE TO T HE NORTH LINE OF" WEST FOSTER AVENUE;
T HENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTE! LINE OF WEST FOSTER AVENUE TO THE POINT" OF BEGINNING, IN COOK COUNT Y, ILLINOIS.
Prepared by ITaeuer Engineering
I 'oslcr/lidcns Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 29, 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
13-10-311 -028 13-10-311-029 13-10-311-030 13-10-311-031 13-10-311 -032 13-10-31 "1-033 13-10-311-034
! 13-10-311-035 13-10-311-036 13-10-311-037 13-10-311-038 13-10-311-030 13-10-311-040 13 10-31 1-011 13-10-311-012 13-10-311-043 13-10-311-044 13-10-31 1-015 13-10-311-046 13-10-311-048 13-10-311-050 13-10-311-051 13-10-311-052 13-10-311.-053 13-10-312-071 13-10-312-072 13-10-312-073 13-10-312-074 13-10-312-075
' 13-10-312-078 13-10-312-079 13-10-312-080 13-10-312-089 13-10-312-090 13-10-313-057 13-10-313-058 13-10-313-059 13-10-313-060 13-10-313-061 13-10-313-062 13-10-313-063 13-10-313-064 13-10-313-065 13-10-314-052 13-10-314-053.
S 27,960
S 63,255
S 64,706
S 13.1-19
S 11,629
S 15,201
S 18,933
S 52,500
S 190,096
S 94,978
$ 28,680
$ 35,683
$ 18,409
$ 11,339
$ 40,007
$ 30,944
$ 41,149
$ 35,683
$ 146,265
$ 72,975
$ 38,202
$ 25,627
$ 18,790
$ 10,835
$ 42,366
$ 19,789
$ 19,753
S 19,753
$ 25,893|109|34,284
$ 17,782
$ 17,104
$ 63,060
$ 23,115
$ 48,763
$ 33,590
$ 31,635
S 31,653
$ 64,587
$ 67,517
$ 67,194
$ 48,055
$ 4,509
$ 37,686
$ 17,252
S 78,377
$ 177,316
$ 181,384
$ 36,S59
$ 32,598
$ 42,611
$ 53,073
$ 147,168
$ 532,877
$ 266,242
$ 80,396
S 100,027
S 51,604
$ 31,785
$ 112,148
$ .: 86,742
S 115,349
$ 100,027
$ 410,010
$ 204,564
$ 107,088
$ 71,838
$ 52,672
$ 30,373
$ 118,760
$ 55,473
$ 55,372
$ 55,372
$ 72,583
$ 96,105
$ 49,847
$ 47,946
$ 1.76,770
$ 64,796
$ 136,692
$ 94,159
$ 88,679
$ S8,73()
S 181,050
$ 1S9,264
$ 188,358
$ "134,708
$ 12,640
$ 105,641
$ 48,361
t'oster/lulens lax Increment Financing Eligibility Report - September 2'K 2017
City of Chicago Eligibility Report
13-10-31- 1-05-1 13-10-314-055 I3-10-314-056 "13-1O-3I4-057 "13-10-314-058 13-10-31 1-059 13-10-315-030 13-10-315-031 13-10-315-032 13-10-315-033 13-10-315-037 13-10-315-038 13-10-316-020 13-10-316-024 13-10-316-026 i 3-i 0-316-035
$ $ S $ % $ $ S $
s
$
% s
s
"17,213
17,074 31,893 44,332 45,636 83,654
4,643 51,402 31,932 57,499 77,282 120,365 217,500
6,736 18,425 94,552
$ S
48,251 47,862 89,402 124,271 127,927 234,499 13,015 1.44 090 89,512 161,181 216,637 337,407 609,696 18,882 51,649 265,048
$ 26,536,100
Foster/I.dens Tax Increment Financing FUgihiHty Report - September 29, 20! 7