Office of the City Clerk - Record #: SO2014-3245

• Record #: SO2014-3245
• Type: Ordinance
• Status: Passed
• Intro date: 4/2/2014
• Current Controlling Legislative Body: Committee on Finance
• Final action: 3/18/2014
• Title: Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Redevelopment Plan for 119th and Halsted Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Redevelopment Area
• Sponsors: Emanuel, Rahm
• Topic: TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS - 119th/Halsted T.I.F. - Approval
• Related files: Or2015-106

Date	Journal Page Number	Action By	Action	Result
5/19/2014	76562	City Council	Signed by Mayor
4/30/2014	78911	City Council	Passed as Substitute	Pass
4/28/2014		Committee on Finance	Recommended to Pass	Pass
4/2/2014		City Council	Referred

CHICAGO April 30, 2014 To the President and Members of the City Council: Your Committee on Finance having had under consideration

One (1) ordinance authorizing Amendment #2 for the 119^th/Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area.

A.      An ordinance approving Amendment #2 to the Redevelopment Plan for the 119^th/Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area.

02014-3245

Having had the same under advisement, begs leave to report and recommend that your Honorable Body pass the proposed Ordinance Transmitted Herewith

This recommendation was concurred in by      (a (viva voce votej)

of members of the committee with      dissenting vote(s)?      

Respectfully submitted

(signed^™ ^

7

Chairman

Document No.

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF CHICAGO

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR

CITY OF CHICAGO

RAHM EMANUEL

MAYOR

April 2,2014

TO THE HONORABLE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

Ladies and Gentlemen:

At the request of the Commissioner of Planning and Development, I transmit herewith an ordinance amending the 119^lh/Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project.

Your favorable consideration of this ordinance will be appreciated.

 

Mayor

Very truly yours,

 

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE 119™ AND HALSTED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT AREA

WHEREAS, under ordinances adopted on February 6,2002, and published in the Journal of Proceedings of the City Council of the City of Chicago (the "Journal") for such date at pages 78512 to 78658, and under the provisions of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4.1 et seg,., as amended (the "Act"), the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Chicago (the "City"): (i) approved a redevelopment plan and project (the "Original Plan") for a portion of the City known as "119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area" (the "2002 Original Project Area") (the "Original Plan Ordinance"); (ii) designated the 2002 Original Project Area as a "redevelopment project area" within the requirements of the Act (the "Designation Ordinance"); and (iii) adopted tax increment financing for the 2002 Original Project Area (the "Adoption Ordinance") (the Original Plan Ordinance, the Designation Ordinance, and the Adoption Ordinance are collectively referred to herein as the "TIF Ordinances"); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to an ordinance adopted on April 9, 2003, and published in the Journal for such date at pages 106129 to 106248, and under the provisions of the Act, the City Council of the City approved changes to the Original Plan's text ("Amendment No. 1" and, together with the Original Plan, the "First Amended Plan") to replace the 1999 equalized assessed valuation ("E.A.V.") with the 2000 E.A.V. to conform the Original Plan to Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(F) of the Act, and to make other minor changes; and

WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens of the City for the City to encourage development of areas located adjacent to the 2002 Original Project Area by adding certain additional continuous parcels (the "2014 Additional Property") to the 2002 Original Project Area and designating such expanded project area as a redevelopment project area under the Act to be known as the 119^th and Halsted TIF Redevelopment Amendment 2 Project Area (together with the 2002 Original Project Area, the "2014 Amended Project Area"); and

WHEREAS, the City desires further to supplement and amend the First Amended Plan for the 2002 Original Project Area to provide for the redevelopment of the 2014 Amended Project Area; and

WHEREAS, the City has caused to be prepared an eligibility study entitled "119th & Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Study - Amendment No. 2" (the "Eligibility Study") of the proposed 2014 Additional Property, which Eligibility Study confirms the existence within the 2014 Additional Property of various conservation factors and vacant blighted factors as set forth in the Act and supports a finding of eligibility of the 2014 Additional Property for designation as a Conservation Area and Vacant Blighted Area under the Act; and

WHEREAS, the First Amended Plan and the "119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2: December 31,2013" ("Amendment No. 2" and, together with the First Amended Plan, the "Second Amended Plan"), provides for the 2014 Amended Project Area and the new total estimated redevelopment project costs; and

WHEREAS, a copy of Amendment No. 2 is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and

WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best interest of the citizens of the City for the City to implement Tax Increment Allocation Financing pursuant to the Act for the 2014 Amended Project

1

Area, which is described in Section 2 of this ordinance and is to be redeveloped pursuant to the Second Amended Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission (the "Commission") of the City has heretofore been appointed by the Mayor of the City with the approval of its City Council (the City Council, referred to herein collectively with the Mayor as the "Corporate Authorities") (as codified in Section 2-124 of the City's Municipal Code) pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act; and

WHEREAS, the Commission is empowered by the Corporate Authorities to exercise certain powers enumerated in Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act, including the holding of certain public hearings required by the Act; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 5/11-74.4-4 and 5/11-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission, by authority of the Corporate Authorities, called a public hearing on October 17,2013, concerning approval of the Second Amended Plan, designation of the 2014 Amended Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the 2014 Amended Project Area pursuant to the Act; and

WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 (including the Eligibility Study) was made available for public inspection and review pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act since January 3,2014, being a date not less than 10 days before the meeting of the Commission at which the Commission adopted Resolution 14-CDC-01 on January 14,2014, accepting the Second Amended Plan for review and fixing the time and place for a public hearing (the "Hearing"), at the offices of the City Clerk and the City's Department of Planning and Development; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act, notice of the availability of Amendment No. 2 (including the related eligibility report and, if applicable, the feasibility study, and the housing impact study) was sent by mail on January 21,2014, which is within a reasonable time after the adoption by the Commission of Resolution 14-CDC-01 to: (a) all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, were determined to be (i) located within the 2014 Amended Project Area and (ii) located within 750 feet of the boundaries of the 2014 Amended Project Area (or, if applicable, were determined to be the 750 residential addresses that were closest to the boundaries of the 2014 Amended Project Area); and (b) organizations and residents that were registered interested parties for such 2014 Amended Project Area; and

WHEREAS, due notice of the Hearing was given pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-6 of the Act, said notice being given to all taxing districts having property within the 2014 Amended Project Area and to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity of the State of Illinois by certified mail on January 17,2014, by publication in the Chicago Sun-Timesor Chicago Tribune on February 11, 2014 and February 18, 2014, by certified mail to taxpayers within the 2014 Amended Project Area on February 11, 2014; and

WHEREAS, a meeting of the joint review board established pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(b) of the Act (the "Board") was convened upon the provision of due notice on February 7,2014 at 10:00 a.m., to review the matters properly coming before the Board and to allow it to provide its advisory recommendation regarding the approval of the Second Amended Plan, designation of the 2014 Amended Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the 2014 Amended Project Area, and other matters, if any, properly before it; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 5/11-74.4-4 and 5/11-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission

2

held the Hearing concerning approval of the Second Amended Plan, designation of the 2014 Amended Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the 2014 Amended Project Area pursuant to the Act on March 11, 2014; and

WHEREAS, the Commission has forwarded to the City Council a copy of its Resolution 14-CDC-09 attached hereto as Exhibit B, adopted on March 11, 2014, recommending to the City Council approval of the Second Amended Plan, among other related matters; and

WHEREAS, since March 11,2014, certain minor revisions have been made to Amendment No. 2, and the so revised Amendment No. 2 has been made available for public inspection and review pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act since March 31, 2014; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the Second Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report and, if applicable, the feasibility study, and the housing impact study), testimony from the Public Meeting and the Hearing, if any, the recommendation of the Board, if any, the recommendation of the Commission, and such other matters or studies as the Corporate Authorities have deemed necessary or appropriate to make the findings set forth herein, and are generally informed of the conditions existing in the 2014 Amended Project Area; now therefore

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO:

Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

Section 2. The 2014 Amended Project Area. The 2014 Amended Project Area is legally described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein. The street location (as near as practicable) for the 2014 Amended Project Area is described in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein. The map of the 2014 Amended Project Area is depicted on Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Section 3. Findings. The Corporate Authorities hereby make the following findings as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(n) of the Act:

1. The 2014 Amended Project Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be expected to be developed without the adoption of the Second Amended Plan;
2. The Second Amended Plan:

1. 1. conforms to the comprehensive plan for the development of the City as a whole; or
   2. either (A) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the Chicago Plan Commission or (B) includes land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission;
2. The Second Amended Plan meets all of the requirements of a redevelopment plan as defined in the Act and, as set forth in the Second Amended Plan, the estimated date of completion of the projects described therein and retirement of all obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs is not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in subsection (b) of Section 11-74.4-8 of the

3

Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year after the year in which the ordinance approving the 2002 Original Project Area was adopted, and, as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-7 of the Act, no such obligation shall have a maturity date greater than 20 years;

d. Within the Second Amended Plan, if applicable:

1. as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(5) of the Act, the housing impact study: a) includes data on residential unit type, room type, unit occupancy, and racial and ethnic composition of the residents; and b) identifies, the number and location of inhabited residential units in the 2014 Amended Project Area that are to be or may be removed, if any, the City's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the 2014 Amended Project Area whose residences are to be removed, the availability of replacement housing for such residents and the type, location, and cost of the replacement housing, and the type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided;
2. as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act, there is a statement that households of low-income and very low-income persons living in residential units that are to be removed from the 2014 Amended Project Area shall be provided affordable housing and relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations under that Act, including the eligibility criteria.

Section 4. Approval of the Second Amended Plan. The City hereby approves the Second Amended Plan pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act.

Section 5. Powers of Eminent Domain. I n compliance with Section 5/11-74.4-4(c) of the Act and with the Second Amended Plan, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to negotiate for the acquisition by the City of parcels contained within the 2014 Amended Project Area. In the event the Corporation Counsel is unable to acquire any of said parcels through negotiation, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings to acquire such parcels. Nothing herein shall be in derogation of any proper authority.

Section 6. Invalidity of Any Section. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance.

Section 7. Supersedes All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage.

4

 

 

List of Attachments

Exhibit A:      Amendment No. 2

Exhibit B: Commission Resolution Recommending to City Council Approval of the Second Amended Plan, Designation of the 2014 Amended Project Area and Adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing

Exhibit C:   ^s Legal Description of the 2014 Amended Project Area

Exhibit D:      Street Location of the 2014 Amended Project Area

Exhibit E:      Map of the 2014 Amended Project Area

5

6

EXHIBIT A Amendment No. 2 See Attached.

119   AND HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA

REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT

Plan Adopted:      February 6, 2002

Amendment No. 1:      January 24, 2003

Amendment No. 2

December 31, 2013 Revised March 28,2014

Prepared for: The City of Chicago

By:

Camiros, Ltd.

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY      1

MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT      1

1. INTRODUCTION      2
2. PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION      4
3. ELIGIBILITY OF PROJECT AREA FOR DESIGNATION AS A CONSERVATION AREA      6
4. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES      8
5. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN      9
6. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION      9
7. GENERAL LAND USE PLAN AND MAP      9
8. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FINANCING      10
9. HOUSING IMPACT STUDY      15
10. PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING THE PLAN      23

] J. CITY OF CHICAGO COMMITMENT TO FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AND      23

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

APPENDIX A (FIGURES 2-7 and TABLE 9)      A-1

APPENDIX B (LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE 119™ AND HALSTED

REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA)      B-1

APPENDIX C (119™ AND HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA      C-l

ELIGIBILITY REPORT)

APPENDIX D (INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY      D-1

WITHIN THE 119^th AMENDMENT AREA)

APPENDIX E (FIRST AMENDED PLAN)      E-1

LIST OF FIGURES      

FIGURE 1      REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY MAP      5

FIGURE 3-A      EXISTING LAND USE      A-2

FIGURE 4-A      EXISTING ZONING      A-3

FIGURE 6-A      GENERAL LAND USE PLAN      A-4

FIGURE 7-A      LAND ACQUISITION OVERVIEW MAP      A-5

i      11?" and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

8

FIGURES WITHIN APPENDIX C; ELIGIBILITY STUDY:

FIGURE A      STUDY AREA      C-2

FIGURE B      EXISTING LAND USE      C-l9

FIGURE C      BUILDING AGE      C-20

FIGURED      DETERIORATION      C-21

FIGURE E      OBSOLESCENCE      C-22

FIGURE F      VACANCY      C-23

FIGURE G      EXCESSIVE LAND COVERAGE      C-24

FIGURE H      TAX BLOCKS      C-25

LIST OF TABLES      

TABLE 1 -A      BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY (2008-2012)      7

TABLE 2      ESTIMATED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COSTS      14

TABLE 3-A      NUMBER AND TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS      17

TABLE 4-A      UNITS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS      18

TABLE 5-A      UNITS BY BEDROOM TYPE      18

TABLE 6-A      RACE AND ETHNICITY CHARACTERISTICS      19

TABLE 7-A      SURVEY OF AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS      21

TABLE 8-A      HOUSEHOLD INCOME      23

TABLE 9-A      LAND ACQUISITION BY PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER      A-6

AND ADDRESS

TABLE A.      COMPARATIVE INCREASES IN EAV - IMPROVED PROPERTY      C-16

TABLE B.      DISTRIBUTION OF BLIGHTING FACTORS      C-l 7

ii      ll?¹' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

9

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

To induce redevelopment pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq., as amended from time to time (the "Act"), the City Council of the City of Chicago (the "City") adopted three ordinances on February 6, 2002, approving the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Plan and Project (the "Original Plan"), designating the 119th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") as a redevelopment project area under the Act, and adopting tax increment allocation financing for the Project Area. The Original Plan was amended pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City on April 9, 2003 to reflect minor changes to the Original Plan's text (the "First Amendment", and together with the Original Plan, the "First Amended Plan"). The First Amended Plan is attached as Appendix E.

The First Amended Plan is being amended again to enlarge the area of the Project Area in order to extend the benefits of tax increment financing to areas adjacent to the Project Area, which have experienced distress and are eligible for tax increment financing, as defined by the Act. This amendment (the "Second Amendment," and together with the First Amended Plan, the "Second Amended Plan") also accommodates minor language changes reflecting updates to the Act since the date of the First Amended Plan. The amendments are outlined below and follow the format of the Original Plan.

This Second Amended Plan summarizes the analysis and findings of the consultant's work, which unless otherwise noted, is the responsibility of the consultant. The City is entitled to rely on the findings and conclusions of this Second Amended Plan in amending the First Amended Plan under the Act. The consultant has prepared this Second Amended Plan with the understanding that the City would rely: 1) on the eligibility findings and conclusions of the Original Plan, and 2) on the fact that the Original Plan contains the necessary information to be compliant with the Act.

The area being added in this Second Amended Plan includes 2,105 residential units. Therefore, a Housing Impact Study has been completed pursuant to Section 1 l-74-.4-3(n) 95) of the Act s a part of this Second Amended Plan (See Section 9, Housing Impact Study).

MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT

The 119th and Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area, which was referred to as the "Project Area" in the Original Plan, will herein be interpreted to mean the "Original Project Area." The area to be added in this Second Amended Plan, shall be referred to herein as the "Amendment Area". References to the Original Project Area together with the Amendment Area shall herein be referred to as the "Amended Project Area" or the "Project Area."

Additionally, the 119th and Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project adopted on February 6, 2002 shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Original Plan" and Second Amended Plan shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Amended Plan" or the "Plan." The amended provisions to the Original Plan are outlined below, with a Supplement 2 added to include the Eligibility Study for the Added Area. Each of the changes detailed below follow the format of the Original Plan.

1      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013

₁₀      Revised March 28, 2014

SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION

The first paragraph is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

This document presents a Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and Project (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq.) (1996 State Bar Edition), as amended (the Act) for the 119^th & Halsted neighborhood located in the City of Chicago, Illinois (the "Project Area"). The Project Area is adjacent to the existing West Pullman Industrial Park Conservation Area. The Project Area boundaries are irregular, with the Project Area extending north-south from III^th Street on the north to the Calumet River on the south; and east-west from Carpenter Street on the west to State Street on the east. The actual configuration of the project boundary meanders considerably within the geographic parameters described above. The Project Area is comprised primarily of a mix of commercial and residential property, with primarily commercial use located along both Halsted Street and 119th Street and primarily residential use elsewhere within the Project Area. The Plan responds to problem conditions within the Project Area and reflects a commitment by the City of Chicago (the "City") to improve and revitalize the Project Area.

The last two sentences of the second paragraph shall be deleted and replaced with the following:

This Amendment No. 2 has been formulated to amend the Original Plan in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The results of a study documenting the eligibility of the Amendment Area as a blighted area are presented in Appendix C, Eligibility Study, (the "Study").

Subsection:    The 119^,h and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area

A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read:

Original Area

Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following:

Amendment Area

The Amendment Area is approximately 407 acres in size and includes 2,450 contiguous parcels and public rights-of-way. The Amendment Area is characterized by:

• buildings over the age of 35 years
• deterioration of buildings, site improvements and right-of-ways
• dilapidation of buildings
• inadequate access to public rights-of-way
• excessive vacancies in terms of vacant lots and vacant buildings
• excessive land coverage

•      other blighting characteristics

2

11

ll?'¹ and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Amendment Area

As a result of these conditions, the Amendment Area is in need of redevelopment, rehabilitation and/or revitalization. In recognition of the unrealized potential of the Amendment Area, the City is taking action to facilitate its revitalization.

The purpose of the Plan is to create a mechanism to allow for the development of new commercial and public facilities on existing vacant and underutilized land, the redevelopment and/or expansion of existing businesses, the redevelopment of obsolete land uses, and the improvement of the area's physical environment and infrastructure. The redevelopment of the Amendment Area is expected to encourage economic revitalization within the community and the surrounding area.

The Amendment Area as a whole has not been subject to growth and development by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the Plan. The eligibility analysis, attached hereto as Appendix C (including Supplement 2, which addresses the Added Area), concluded that property in this area is experiencing deterioration and disinvestment. The analysis of conditions within the Amendment Area indicates that it is appropriate for designation as a "blighted area" in accordance with the Act.

The Plan summarizes the analyses and findings of the consultant's work, which unless otherwise noted, is solely the responsibility of Camiros, Ltd. and its subconsultants. Camiros, Ltd. has prepared this 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project and the related eligibility report with the understanding that the City would rely (i) on the findings and conclusions of the Plan and the related eligibility report in proceeding with the designation of the Amendment Area and the adoption and implementation of the Plan, and (ii) on the fact that Camiros, Ltd. has obtained the necessary information so that the Plan and the related eligibility report will comply with the Act.

The Second Amended Plan has been formulated in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

3      U9"¹ and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

< ₂      Revised March 28, 2014

SECTION 2.   PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION

The first paragraph of Section 2 shall be replaced with the following:

The land within the amended 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area (the "Amended Project Area") is shown in Figure 1, Boundary Map. The Project Area is approximately 590 acres in size, including public rights-of-way. The Original Project Area was approximately 183 acres in size and was adopted as a "blighted area." This Amendment No. 2 is approximately 407 acres in size, including public rights-of-way and is being proposed as a "conservation area." A legal description of the Amended Project Area is included as Appendix B of this document. The Amended Project Area is adjacent to the West Pullman Industrial Conservation Area. The Project Area includes only contiguous parcels. This Amendment No. 2 includes only that area that is anticipated to be substantially benefited by the proposed redevelopment project improvements.

Subsection:   Community Background

The following new paragraph shall be added after the fourth paragraph:

However, recent demographic trends frame the general distress that now exists in the area and the need for public intervention to advance revitalization. According to the U.S. Census, the West Pullman Community Area, the community within which most of the Project Area is located, lost 6,998 residents between 2000 and 2010, representing a loss of 19% of the community area population. Median household income also declined within the West Pullman Community Area, falling from $41,141 in 2000 to $39,601 in 2010. These demographic trends, combined with on-the-ground surveys indicating increasing building deterioration, vacant buildings, and vacant land/lots, clearly indicate that the level of distress within the general area is increasing and that these conditions cannot be addressed without public intervention.

Subsection:   Current Land Use and Zoning

A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read:

Original Area

Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following:

4      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

₁₃      Revised March 28, 2014

Redevelopment Protect Arp_a Boundary m*_p      

•        «       MS TIS~

119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No 2            ~ CaiTlirOS

o

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

¹⁴      Revised March 28, 2014

Amendment Area

The existing land use of the Amendment Area is characterized by: a) a high proportion of residential use, largely single family dwellings; b) semi-public and institutional uses scattered along the major streets of Halsted Street and 119^th Street as well as on local streets within the residential areas; c) a small proportion of mixed-use properties, primarily commercial combined with residential, located mostly along the major streets of Halsted Street and 119^th Street; d) a major public open space, West Pullman Park, is located in the southwestern portion of the Amendment Area; e) commercial use is focused along the major streets of Halsted Street and 119^th Street; and f) vacant lots are scattered throughout the Amendment Area within both residential and commercial areas. Figure 3A, Existing Land Use, illustrates the current pattern of land use within the Amendment Area.

Existing zoning for the Amendment Area is largely consistent with existing land use. Business and commercial zoning covers most portions of Halsted Street and 119^th Street, although small areas of manufacturing and residential zoning exist to reflect existing uses in these areas. A large area of "parks and open space" zoning is placed, appropriately, over West Pullman Park. The balance of the Amendment Area is in residential zoning classifications. Figure 4A, Existing Zoning, illustrates the current pattern of land use within the Amendment Area.

SECTION 3.   ELIGIBILITY OF THE PROJECT AREA FOR DESIGNATION AS A BLIGHTED AREA

A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read:

Original Area

Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following:

Amendment Area

The Amendment Area on the whole has not been subject to significant growth and development through investment by private enterprise. Based on the conditions present, the area is not likely to be comprehensively or effectively developed without the adoption of the Plan. In May and October of 2013, a series of studies were undertaken to establish whether the proposed Amendment Area is eligible for designation as a blighted area in accordance with the requirements of the Act. This analysis concluded that the Amendment Area so qualifies.

The following six factors were found to be present to a major extent:

• Deterioration (affecting 94% of all tax blocks)
• Obsolescence (affecting 87% of all tax blocks)
• Excessive vacancies (affecting 78% of all tax blocks)

6      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

a ₅      Revised March 28, 2014

• • Excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities (affecting 84% of all tax blocks)
• Stagnant or declining EAV
• Lack of Community Planning

One additional factor is present to a minor extent within the Amendment Area:

• Dilapidation (affecting 30% of all tax blocks)

Subsection: Need for Public Intervention

A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read:

Original Area

Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following:

Amendment Area

The analysis of conditions within the Amendment Area included an evaluation of construction activity between 2008 and 2012. Table 1 summarizes construction activity within the Redevelopment Amendment Area by year and project type.

Table 1A

BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY r2008-2012

	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	5 Year Totals
Construction Value
New Construction	S 673,848	$ 416,225	$116,271	$ 84,539	$ 149,386	$ 1,440,269
Repairs/ Rehab	$ 373,576	$ 442,624	$ 473,060	$304,824	$ 378,986	$1,973,070
Demolition	$20	$ 21,542	$ 2,033	$ 24,652	$5	$48,252
Public/Semi-Public	$ 0	$0	$0	$1,057,750	$5,000	$1,062,750
Total	$ 1,047,444	$ 880,391	$591,364	$1,471,765	$533,377	$ 4,524,341
# Permits Issued
New Construction	16	16	17	13	13	75
Repairs/Rehab	69	66	40	33	50	258
Demolition	3	6	9	11	6	35
Public/Semi-Public	0	0	0	0	3	3
Total	88	88	66	57	72	371

Source: City of Chicago, Dept. of Buildings

7 16

719"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

During this five-year period, a total of 371 building permits were issued for property within the Amendment Area. In analyzing the building permit activity, it should be recognized that a certain level of activity occurs merely to address basic maintenance needs, which appears to account for a large majority of the construction activity. Only one in five building permits issued was for new construction or building additions, while nearly 70% of all building permits were issued for repairs/rehabilitation. While a total of 75 permits were issued for new construction and building additions, 35 were issued for building demolitions, which were often done to remove abandoned buildings for health and safety reasons. The dollar value for new construction reflects the relative lack of new private sector investment. Approximately 32% of the total dollar value of building permit activity was attributable to new construction and building additions, which 70% of the dollar value was for repairs and rehabilitation.

The $4,524,341 in construction spending that has occurred in the Amendment Area over the past five years represents a minimal level of investment. This five-year private sector investment is roughly equal to the development value of approximately 12 moderately priced ($350,000) single-family homes. Given that there are 234 vacant lots within the Amendment Area, which could accommodate new homes, this level of new investment is minimal and inadequate. Given the large amount of vacant land present within the Amendment Area, and the presence of widespread deterioration, a significantly higher level of private investment is required to reverse the area's decline. Clearly, the lack of development is not being resolved through private-sector investment, and a continuation of this minimal level of private investment may exacerbate blight within the Amendment Area.

SECTION 4.   REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The addition of the following two new goals to be added under "Redevelopment Objectives ":

• Encourage the redevelopment of vacant, underutilized or obsolete commercial and residential property along Halsted Street for new mixed use development comprised of affordable multi-family residential dwellings above ground floor commercial, office or service space.
• Encourage the redevelopment of older obsolete single family residential property for new owner-occupied single family dwellings, to be facilitated in part, by the write-down of land costs.

8      119^th and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

₁₇      Revised March 28, 2014

SECTION 5.   REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

Subsection:      Property Assembly, Site Preparation and Environmental Remediation:

A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read:

Original Area

Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following:

Amendment Area

Figure 7A, Land Acquisition Overview Map (Appendix A), identifies the properties proposed for acquisition within the Amendment Area. Table 2A, Land Acquisition by Parcel Identification Number and Address (see Appendix A), provides a list of the properties proposed for acquisition within the Amendment Area.

SECTION 6.   REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Section 6 shall remain as written.

SECTION 7.  GENERAL LAND USE PLAN AND MAP

Section 7 shall remain, except that the fourth paragraph under the land use category heading Commercial/Mixed Use shall be replaced with the following:

Mixed-Use

Mixed use development is proposed for the Halsted Street corridor and for properties on 119th Street and 115th Street. This land use categories permits commercial, retail, residential, public, and institutional uses. Commercial and retail development is envisioned for most of this area. Allowing residential use and public/institutional use along with commercial use provides needed flexibility in order to maximize redevelopment activity. Continued industrial use is not envisioned and the relocation of a small number of older existing industrial uses is needed to facilitate broader commercial redevelopment of land, particularly along Halsted Street.

9      J19"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013

4 o      Revised March 28, 2014

SECTION 8.   REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FINANCING

Subsection:    Eligible Redevelopment Costs

A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read:

Original Area

Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following:

Redevelopment project costs include the sum total of all reasonable or necessary costs incurred, estimated to be incurred, or incidental to this Plan pursuant to the Act. Such costs may include, without limitation, the following:

1. Costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and administration of the Plan including but not limited to, staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other services (excluding lobbying expenses), provided that no charges for professional services are based on a percentage of the tax increment collected;
2. The costs of marketing sites within the Project Area to prospective businesses, developers and investors;
3. Property assembly costs, including but not limited to, acquisition of land and other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of buildings, site preparation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground level or below ground environmental contamination, including, but not limited to parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, and the clearing and grading of land;
4. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction or repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings, fixtures, and leasehold improvements; and the costs of replacing an existing public building if pursuant to the implementation of a redevelopment project the existing public building is to be demolished to use the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private investment; including any direct or indirect costs relating to Green Globes or LEED certified construction elements or construction elements with an equivalent certification;
5. Costs of the construction of public works or improvements, including any direct or indirect costs relating to Green Globes or LEED certified construction elements or construction elements with an equivalent certification subject to the limitations in Section 1 l-74.4-3(q)(4) of the Act;
6. Costs of job training and retraining projects including the cost of welfare to work programs implemented by businesses located within the Project Area;
7. Financing costs including, but not limited to, all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued thereunder including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of

10      119"' and Halsted TJF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

₁ q      Revised March 28, 2014

any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and for a period not exceeding 36 months following completion and including reasonable reserves related thereto;

h)      To the extent the City by written agreement accepts and approves the same, all or a portion

of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from the redevelopment project necessarily

incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of the Plan.

i)      An elementary, secondary, or unit school district's increased costs attributable to assisted

housing units will be reimbursed as provided in the Act;

j) Relocation costs to the extent that the City determines that relocation costs shall be paid or is required to make payment of relocation costs by federal or state law or by Section 74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act (see Relocation section);

k) Payment in lieu of taxes, as defined in the Act;

1) Costs of job training, retraining, advanced vocational education or career education, including but not limited to, courses in occupational, semi-technical or technical fields leading directly to employment, incurred by one or more taxing districts, provided that such costs; (i) are related to the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vocational education or career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in the Project Area; and (ii) when incurred by a taxing district or taxing districts other than the City, are set forth in a written agreement by or among the City and the taxing district or taxing districts, which agreement describes the program to be undertaken including but not limited to, the number of employees to be trained, a description of the training and services to be provided, the number and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program and sources of funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the payment by community college districts of costs pursuant to Sections 3-37, 3-38, 3-40, and 3-40.1 of the Public Community College Act, 110 ILCS 805/3-37, 805/3-38, 805/3-40 and 805/3-40.1, and by school districts of costs pursuant to Sections 10-22.20a and 10-23.3a of the School Code, 105 ILCS 5/10-22.20a and 5/10-23.3a;

m) Interest costs incurred by a redeveloper related to the construction, renovation or rehabilitation of a redevelopment project provided that:

1. such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation fund established pursuant to the Act;
2. such payments in any one year may not exceed 30 percent of the annual interest costs incurred by the redeveloper with regard to the redevelopment project during that year;
3. if there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax allocation fund to make the payment pursuant to this provision, then the amounts so due shall accrue and be payable when sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund;
4. the total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may not exceed 30 percent of the total: (i) cost paid or incurred by the redeveloper for such redevelopment project; (ii) redevelopment project costs excluding any property assembly costs and any relocation costs incurred by the City pursuant to the Act; and

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

5. up to 75 percent of the interest cost incurred by a redeveloper for the financing of rehabilitated or new housing for low-income households and very low-income households, as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act.

n) Instead of the eligible costs provided for in (m) 2, 4 and 5 above, the City may pay up to 50 percent of the cost of construction, renovation and/or rehabilitation of all low- and very low-income housing units (for ownership or rental) as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. If the units are part of a residential redevelopment project that includes units not affordable to low- and very low-income households, only the low- and very low-income units shall be eligible for benefits under the Act;

o) The costs of daycare services for children of employees from low-income families working for businesses located within the Project Area and all or a portion of the cost of operation of day care centers established by Project Area businesses to serve employees from low-income families working in businesses located in the Project Area. For the purposes of this paragraph, "low-income families" means families whose annual income does not exceed 80 percent of the City, county or regional median income as determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.

p) Unless explicitly provided in the Act, the cost of construction of new privately-owned buildings shall not be an eligible redevelopment project cost;

q) If a special service area has been established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act, 35 ILCS 235/0.01 et seg_., then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act may be used within the Project Area for the purposes permitted by the Special Service Area Tax Act as well as the purposes permitted by the Act.

Subsection:    Estimated Project Costs

A. The line item estimated project costs shown in paragraphs 1-9 shall be amended as follows:

1. (Estimated cost:      $1,550,000)
2. (Estimated cost:      $10,000,000)
3. (Estimated cost:      $4,250,000)
4. (Estimated cost:      $12,500,000)
5. (Estimated cost:      $1,050,000)
6. (Estimated cost:      $1,050,000)
7. (Estimated cost:      $3,550,000)
8. (Estimated cost:      $300,000)
9. (Estimated cost:      $2,500,000)

B.   The first sentence of the last paragraph of the subsection titled "Estimated Project Costs " shall be revised as follows:

"The estimated gross eligible project cost over the life of the Area is $38 million."

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

C.  Table 2, Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs, shall be replaced with the following:

Table 2

ESTIMATED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COSTS

Program Action/Improvement      Budget      

Professional and Administrative $1,550,000

Costs - Planning, Legal, Surveys,

Redevelopment Marketing Costs

Property Assembly and Site      $ 11,000,000

Preparation

Rehabilitation (may include up to $4,250,000 50% of the cost of construction of low and very low-income housing units)

Public Improvements      $12,500,000 (1)

Job Training and Retraining $1,050,000 Relocation $1,050,000 Financing and Interest Costs $3,550,000 Day Care $300,000 Taxing District Capital Costs $2,500,000

TOTAL      $38,000,000  (2) (3)

1. This category may also include reimbursing capital costs of taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the Area and school district costs pursuant to the Act. As permitted by the Act, the City may pay, or reimburse all, or a portion of a taxing district's costs resulting from the Redevelopment Project pursuant to a written agreement by the City accepting and approving such costs.
2. The Total Project Costs exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense, capitalized interest and costs associated with optional redemptions. These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total Project Costs. The amount of the Total Project Costs that can be incurred in the Area will be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated from the Area only by a public right-of-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in the Area, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in the Area which are paid from incremental taxes generated from contiguous redevelopment project areas.
3. The Total Project Costs provides an upper limit on expenditures and adjustments may be made in line items without amendment to the Plan.
4. An elementary, secondary, or unit scholl district's increased costs attributable to assisted housing units will be reimbursed as provided in the act.

Subsection: Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation

A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read:

13      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

22      Revised March 28, 2014

Original Area

Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following:

Amendment Area

The purpose of identifying the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("EAV") of the Project Area is to provide an estimate of the initial EAV, which the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental EAV and incremental property taxes of the Project Area. The 2012 EAV of all taxable parcels in the Amendment Area is $44,339,479. This total EAV amount by PIN is summarized in Appendix D. The EAV is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk, and shall become the Certified Initial EAV from which all incremental property taxes in the Area will be calculated by Cook County.

Subsection: Anticipated Equalized Assessed Valuation

A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read:

Original Area

Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following:

Amendment Area

Once the redevelopment project has been completed and the property is fully assessed, the EAV of real property within the Amendment Area is estimated to increase to approximately $56.5 million. This estimate has been calculated assuming that the Project Area will be developed in accordance with Figure 6A, General Land Use Plan, of the Plan.

The estimated EAV assumes that the assessed value of property within the Amendment Area will increase substantially as a result of new development and public improvements.

Calculation of the estimated EAV is based on several assumptions, including: 1) redevelopment of the Amendment Area will occur in a timely manner; 2) the application of the current State Multiplier of 2.8056 to the projected assessed value of property within the Redevelopment Project Area; and 3) an eventual return to a modest rate of property appreciation.

14      1 if and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 20/3

23      Revised March 28, 2014

SECTION 9.  HOUSING IMPACT STUDY

The existing material in Section 9, Housing Impact Study, will be retained to document the analysis prepared for the Original Area. A separate analysis is hereby inserted for the Amendment Area, below:

HOUSING IMPACT STUDY - AMENDMENT AREA

A Housing Impact Study has been conducted for the Amendment Area to determine the potential impact of redevelopment on Amendment Area residents. As set forth in the Act, if the redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project area would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited residential units and the City is unable to certify that no displacement of residents will occur, the municipality must prepare a housing impact study and incorporate the study in the redevelopment project plan. This Housing Impact Study, which is part of the 119 and Halsted Street Second Amended Plan, fulfills this requirement. It is also integral to the formulation of the goals, objectives, and policies of the Plan.

The Amendment Area contains a total of 2,105 residential units, of which 1,857 are inhabited. The Plan provides for the development or redevelopment of several portions of the Amendment Area that may contain occupied residential units. As a result, it is possible that by implementation of this Plan, the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units could occur.

The focus of this Plan is on the conservation of the existing industrial, commercial and residential mixed-use districts and demolition of occupied residential units is not contemplated. While there are no current plans to displace any residential units over the 23-year life of the TIF, displacement of ten or more inhabited residential units may occur. Therefore, a housing impact study is required. This Housing Impact Study, which is part of the 119^th and Halsted Street Second Amended Plan, fulfills this requirement. The results of the housing impact study section described below present certain factual information required by the Act.

This Housing Impact Study is organized into two parts. Part I - Housing Survey describes the housing survey conducted within the Amendment Area to determine existing housing characteristics. Part II -Potential Housing Impact describes the potential impact of the Plan. Specific elements of the Housing Impact Study include:

Part I - Housing Survey

1. Type of residential unit, either single-family, multi-family or mixed-use.
2. The number and type of rooms within the units, if that information is available.
3. Whether the units are inhabited or uninhabited, as determined not less than 45 days before the date that the ordinance or resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 11-74.4-5 of the Act is passed.
4. Data as to the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units, which shall be deemed to be fully satisfied if based on data from the most recent federal census.

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Part II - Potential Housing Impact

1. The number and location of those units that will be or may be removed.
   1. The municipality's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the proposed redevelopment project area whose residencies are to be removed.
   2. The availability of replacement housing for those residents whose residences are to be removed, and the identification of the type, location, and cost of the replacement housing.

iv.      The type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided.

PART I - HOUSING SURVEY

Part I of this study provides the number, type and size of residential units within the Amendment Area, the number of inhabited and uninhabited units, and the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units.

Number and Type of Residential Units

The number and type of residential units within the Amendment Area were identified during the land use and housing survey conducted as part of the eligibility analysis for the Amendment Area. This survey, completed on September 27, 2013, revealed that the Amendment Area contains 1,900 residential or mixed-use residential buildings containing a total of 2,105 units. The number of residential units by building type is outlined in Table 3-A: Number and Type of Residential Units.

Table 3-A:

NUMBER AND TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS

Building Type	Total Number of Buildings	Total Number of Units	Total Number of Inhabited Units
Single-Family	1,775	1,775	1,603
Multi-Family	105	289	225
Mixed-Use (Residential Above)	20	41	29
Total	1,900	2,105	1,857

Source: Applied Real Estate Analysis, Ltd., Camiros, Ltd.

Number and Type of Rooms in Residential Units

The distribution of the 2,105 residential units within the Amendment Area by number of rooms and by number of bedrooms is identified in tables within this section. The methodology to determine this information is described below.

Methodology

In order to describe the distribution of residential units by number and type of rooms within the Amendment Area, the consultants analyzed the 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate data conducted by the United States Census Bureau by Census Tract for those Census Tracts encompassed by the Amendment Area. Census Tracts, as defined by the U.S. Census, are small,

16      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

₂c      Revised March 28, 2014

relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county delineated by local participants as part of the U.S. Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program. In this study, the consultants have relied on 2007-2011 federal census estimate data because it is the best and most current available information regarding the housing units within the Amendment Area. The Census Tract data available for the Amendment Area are based on a sampling of residential units. (As the Census Tract geographies encompass a greater area beyond the Amendment Area, numbers will be higher than the actual count.) Based on this data, a proportional projection was made of the distribution of units by the number of rooms and the number of bedrooms in each unit. The results of this survey are outlined in Table 4-A: Units by Number of Rooms, and in Table —5-A: Units by Number of Bedrooms.

Table 4-A:

UNITS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS

Number of Rooms	Percentage (2007-2011 Estimate)	Current Estimated Units in the Amendment Area
1 Room	0.0%	0
2 Rooms	0.0%	0
3 Rooms	3.1%	64
4 Rooms	9.9%	209
5 Rooms	28.4%	598
6 Rooms	23.7%	499
7+ Rooms	34.9%	735
Total	100.0%	2,105

Source: 2007-2011 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau

1 As defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, for each unit, rooms include living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, enclosed porches suitable for year-round use, and lodger's rooms. Excluded are strip or Pullman kitchens, bathrooms, open porches, balconies, halls or foyers, half-rooms, utility rooms, unfinished attics or basements, or other unfinished space used for storage. A partially divided room is a separate room only if there is a partition from floor to ceiling, but not if the partition consists solely of shelves or cabinets.

Table 5-A:

UNITS BY NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ²

Number of Bedrooms	Percentage (2007-2011 Estimate)	Current Estimated Units in the Amendment Area
Studio	0.0%	0
1 Bedroom	4.6%	96
2 Bedrooms	27.5%	578
3 Bedrooms	41.9%	882
4 Bedrooms	20.3%	428
5+ Bedrooms	5.8%	121
Total	100.0%	2,105

Source: 2007-2011 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau

2 As defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, number of bedrooms includes all rooms intended for use as bedrooms even if they are currently used for some other purpose. A housing unit consisting of only one room, such as a one-room efficiency apartment, is classified, by definition, as having no bedroom.

17      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

₂₆      Revised March 28, 2014

Number of Inhabited Units

A survey of inhabited dwelling units within the Amendment Area was conducted by Applied Real Estate Analysis, Inc. with assistance from Camiros, Ltd. and completed on September 27, 2013. This survey identified 2,105 residential units, of which 248 were identified as vacant. Therefore, there are approximately 1,857 total inhabited units within the Amendment Area. As required by the Act, this information was ascertained as of September 27, 2013, which is a date not less than 45 days prior to the date that the resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 11 -74.4-5 of the Act is or will be passed (the resolution setting the public hearing and Joint Review Board meeting dates).

Race and Ethnicity of Residents

The racial and ethnic composition of the residents within the Amendment Area is identified in Table 6-A: Race and Ethnicity Characteristics, within this section. The methodology to determine this information is described below.

Methodology

As required by the Act, the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units was determined. Population estimates were made based on data from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates conducted by the United States Census Bureau. The Consultants analyzed this data by Census Tracts encompassed by the Amendment Area. The Consultants have relied on 2007-2011 federal census estimate data because it is the best and most current available information regarding the residents within the Amendment Area.

The total population for the Amendment Area was estimated by multiplying the number of inhabited households within the Amendment Area (1,857) by the average household size (3.5) within the Amendment Area. Based on the estimated total population, a proportional projection was made of the race and ethnicity characteristics of the residents. According to these projections, there are an estimated 6,500 residents living within the Amendment Area. The race and ethnic composition of these residents is indicated in Table 6-A: Race and Ethnicity Characteristics.

Table 6-A:

RACE AND ETHNICITY CHARACTERISTICS

Race	Percentage (2007-2011 Estimate)	Estimated Residents
White	0.7%	45
Black or African American	97.9%	6,362
American Indian and Alaska Native	0.0%	0
Asian	0.0%	0
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander	0.0%	0
Some Other Race	0.0%	0
Two or More Races	1.4%	93
Total	100.0%	6,500
Hispanic Origin	Percentage (2007-2011 Estimate)	Estimated Residents
Hispanic	.03%	2
Non-Hispanic	99.97%	6,498
Total	100.0%	6,500

Source: 2007-2011 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau

18

27

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

PART II - POTENTIAL HOUSING IMPACT

Part II contains, as required by the Act, information on any acquisition, relocation program, replacement housing, and relocation assistance.

Number and Location of Units That May Be Removed

The primary objectives of the Plan are to reduce deleterious conditions within the Amendment Area and upgrade public and private infrastructure to stimulate private investment in the Amendment Area. Although the Plan does not specifically propose redevelopment of current residential uses, some displacement of residential units may occur in the process of redeveloping obsolete buildings that contain a residential component and may also occur through private market development activity.

There is a possibility that over the remaining life of the TIF District, some inhabited residential units may be removed as a result of implementing the Plan. In order to meet the statutory requirement of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed, a methodology was established that would provide a rough, yet reasonable, estimate. This methodology is described below.

Methodology

The methodology used to fulfill the statutory requirements of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed involves three steps.

1. Step one counts all inhabited residential units previously identified on any underlying acquisition maps. Because there are no underlying redevelopment areas or land acquisition maps, the number of inhabited residential units that may be removed due to previously identified acquisition is zero.
2. Step two counts the number of inhabited residential units contained within buildings that are dilapidated as defined by the Act. From the survey conducted by Applied Real Estate Analysis, Inc. with assistance from Camiros, Ltd., 54 buildings are classified as dilapidated with 59 units within these buildings. Of these 59 dwelling units, 22 are inhabited.
3. Step three counts the number of inhabited residential units that exist where the future land use indicated by the Plan will not include residential uses. After reviewing the Land Use Plan for the Amendment Area, it was determined that residents from two residential units would be displaced as a result of land use change. Of those two residential units, one unit is inhabited.

While residential displacement is not contemplated as part of this Amended Plan, it is projected that 23 inhabited residential units could potentially be removed during remaining life of the TIF district as a result of private development actions or other conditions that are presently unknown.

Replacement Housing

19

28

In accordance with Section 11-74.4-3 (n)(7) of the Act, the City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that affordable replacement housing for any qualified displaced resident whose residence is removed is located in or near the Amendment Area. To promote the development of affordable housing, the Plan requires developers receiving tax increment financing assistance for market-rate housing to set aside at least 20% of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Housing and Economic Development.    Generally, this means affordable rental units should be affordable to

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

households earning no more than 80% of the area median income (adjusted for family size). If, during the 23-year life of the 119^th and Halsted Street TIF Amendment No. 2 Redevelopment Amendment Area, the acquisition plans change, the City shall make every effort to ensure that appropriate replacement housing will be found in either the Amendment Area or the surrounding Community Areas.

The location, type and cost of a sample of possible replacement housing units located within the surrounding Community Areas were determined through classified advertisements from the Chicago Sun-Times, Chicago Tribune and from Internet listings on Apartments.com and Zillow.com during November 2013. It is important to note that Chicago has a rental cycle where apartments turn over at a greater rate on May 1 and October 1 of each year. These times generally reflect a wider variety of rental rates, unit sizes and locations than those available at other times throughout the year. The location, type and cost of housing units found to be available are listed in Table 7-A: Survey of Available Housing Units.

Table 7-A:

SURVEY OF AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS

#	Location	#of Bedroom s	Rental Price (I)	Type of Unit	Community Area
1	12204 S. Wentworth	2	$950+	Single family	West Pullman
2	12419 S. Emerald	4	$1,250+	Single family	West Pullman
3	12833 S. Parnell	4	$1,499+	Single family	West Pullman
4	12052 S. Michigan	3	$1,375+	Single family	Roseland
5	12135 S. Normal	3	$1,075+	Single family	West Pullman
6	12148 S. Union	4	$1,550+	Single family	West Pullman
7	11844 S.Yale	4	$1,300+	Single family	West Pullman
8	12433 S. Perry	4	$1,350	Single family	West Pullman
9	11959 S. Prairie	3	$1,125	Single family	West Pullman
10	152 W. 117* Street	2	$1,100+	Single family	West Pullman
11	11932 S. Stewart	1	$550	Apartment	West Pullman
12	11845 S.Union	3	$875	Apartment	West Pullman
13	409 S. 118,h Street	2	$800	Apartment	West Pullman
14	11634 S. Normal	3	$750	Apartment	West Pullman
15	409 W. 118th Street	2	$800	Apartment	West Pullman
16	152 W. 117"'Place	2	$1,100	Apartment	West Pullman

Source: Camiros, Ltd.

Relocation Assistance

20

29

Although the removal or displacement of housing units is not a goal of the Plan, it is possible that a small number of units may be removed in the process of implementing the Plan. If the removal or displacement of low-income, very low-income, or moderate-income households is required, such residents will be

119"' and Halsted T/F

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

provided with affordable housing and with relocation assistance in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations thereunder, including the eligibility criteria. Affordable housing may be either existing or newly constructed housing. The City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that affordable replacement housing for the aforementioned households is located in or near the Amendment Area.

As used in the above paragraph, "very low-income household," "low-income household," "moderate-income household" and "affordable housing" have the meanings set forth in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act, 310 ILCS 65/3. As of the date of this Plan, these statutory terms have the following meanings:

1. "Very low-income household" means a single-person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is not more than 50 percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as so determined bythe U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.;
2. "Low-income household" means a single-person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 50 percent but less than 80 percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such adjusted income and median income are determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937;
3. "Moderate-income household" means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 80 percent but less than 120 percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such adjusted income and median income for the area are determined from time to time by HUD for purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937; and
4. "Affordable housing" means residential housing that, so long as the same is occupied by low-income households or very low-income households, requires payment of monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, of no more than 30 percent of the maximum allowable income for such households, as applicable.

In order to estimate the number of very low-income, low-income, and moderate-income households in the Amendment Area, the consultants used data available from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates conducted by the United States Census Bureau. The consultants have relied on this data because it is the best and most current available information regarding the income characteristics of the Amendment Area.

It is estimated that 23.8 percent of the households within the Amendment Area may be classified as very low-income; 28.6 percent may be classified as low-income; and 23.1 percent may be classified as moderate-income. The remaining 24.5 percent have incomes above moderate income levels. Applying these percentages to the 1,347 inhabited residential units (equivalent to households) identified during the survey completed by the Consultants, it is estimated that 442 households within the Amendment Area may be classified as very low-income; 531 households may be classified as low-income; 430 households may be classified as moderate-income; and 455 households may be classified as above moderate-income. This information is summarized in Table 8-A: Household Income.

21      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

₃₀      Revised March 28, 2014

Table 8-A: Household Income

Household Income Category	Annual Income Range (2011 Inflation-Adjusted)	Percentage of Households	Estimated Number of Households
Very Low-Income	$0 - $27,299	23.8%	442
Low-Income	$27,300 - $43,678	28.6%	531
Moderate-Income	$43,679-$65,518	23.1%	429
Above Moderate-Income	$65,519 or more	24.5%	455
Total		100.0%	1,857

Source: 2007-2011 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau

As described above, the estimates of the total number of very low-income, low-income and moderate income households within the Amendment Area collectively represent 75.5 percent of the total inhabited units, and the number of households in the low-income categories collectively represent 52.4 percent of the total inhabited units. Therefore, replacement housing for any displaced households over the course of the 23-year life of the 119^th and Halsted Street TIF Amendment No. 2 Redevelopment Project Area should be affordable at these income levels. It should be noted that these income levels are likely to change over the 23-year life of the Project Area as both median income and income levels within the Project Area change.

22      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

₃ <      Revised March 28, 2014

SECTION 10. PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING THE PLAN

Section 10 shall remain unchanged.

SECTION 11. CITY OF CHICAGO COMMITMENT TO FAIR

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

The entire Section is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

The City is committed to and will affirmatively implement the following principles with respect to both the Original Area and the Amendment Area:

1. The assurance of equal opportunity in all personnel and employment actions, with respect to the Redevelopment Project, including, but not limited to hiring, training, transfer, promotion, discipline, fringe benefits, salary, employment working conditions, termination, etc., without regard to race, color, sex, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, military discharge status, source of income, or housing status.
2. Redevelopers must meet the City's standards for participation of 24 percent Minority Business Enterprises and 4 percent Woman Business Enterprises and the City Resident Construction Worker Employment Requirement as required in redevelopment agreements.
3. This commitment to affirmative action and nondiscrimination will ensure that all members of the protected groups are sought out to compete for all job openings and promotional opportunities.
4. Redevelopers will meet City standards for any applicable prevailing wage rate as ascertained by the Illinois Department of Labor to all project employees.

The City shall have the right in its sole discretion to exempt certain small businesses, residential property owners and developers from the above.

23      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013

32      Revised March 28, 2014

APPENDIX A

119TH AND HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA - AMENDMENT NO. 2

FIGURES 2-7 TABLE 9A

Appendix A shall be modified with the following replacement or additional figures and tables:

FIGURE 2    REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESIGNATIONS (this figure shall remain)

FIGURE 3    EXISTING LAND USE

(this figure shall remain to address the Original Area)

FIGURE 3A EXISTING LAND USE

(this figure shall be added to address the Amendment Area)

FIGURE 4    EXISTING ZONING

(this figure shall remain to address the Original Area)

FIGURE 4A EXISTING ZONING

(this figure shall be added to address the Amendment Area)

FIGURE 5    PUBLIC FACILITIES MAP

(this figure shall remain to address the Original Area)

FIGURE 6    GENERAL LAND USE PLAN

(this figure shall remain to address the Original Area)

FIGURE 6A GENERAL LAND USE PLAN

(this figure shall be added to address the Amendment Area)

FIGURE 7    LAND ACQUISITION OVERVIEW MAP

(this figure shall remain to address the Original Area)

FIGURE 7A LAND ACQUISITION OVERVIEW MAP

(this figure shall be added to address the Amendment Area)

TABLE 9A   LAND ACQUISITION BY BLOCK AND PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

(this table shall be added to identify the properties that may be acquired within the Amendment Area)

A-1      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014

33

i

 

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014

 

A-3      119" and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014

35

Legend

I      lOrtghslPrcjrclArea

U.jAmondnwrfArea General Land Use BMtuxl-UM 8Z3 Pi*' Open Spice Public' IniStuHorul E3 RetldenDal

FIGURE 6A

General Land Use plan

City of Chicago

119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2

camiros

March 28. 2014

^      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014

36

I.:

rrcHii

•      ■  •        -.      g      ,             .      MM. .       

lMTfl1lt^y_U::_JjtT-_T,.-_n

      -rv:iriPii|.-!Tiflfi, J~

JLLBG'Jr HIE

FIGURE 7A

Land Acquisition Overview Map

City or Chicago

119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2

camiros

March 28. 2014

119"' and Halsted TIF Second A mended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014

TABLE 9A LAND ACQUISITION BY BLOCK AND PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

#		PIN		ADDRESS
1		25214260270000		146 W 119TH ST
2		25214270270000		124 W 119TH ST
3		25214270320000		102 W 119TH ST
4		25214270330000		100 W 119TH ST
5		25214280120000		58W119THST
6		25214280130000		56 W 119TH ST
7		25214280140000		54 W 119TH ST
8		25214280150000		50 W 119TH ST
9		25223200050000		11845 S STATE ST
10		25223200150000		16 E 119TH ST
11		25223200160000		18 E 119TH ST
12		25223200180000		26 E 119TH ST
13		25223200190000		28 E 119TH ST
14		25223200220000		36 E 119TH ST
15		25271000080000		17 E 119TH ST
16		25271000090000		21 E 119TH ST
17		25281060090000		11915 S NORMAL AVE
18		25281060130000		11925 S NORMAL AVE
19		25281060160000		11939 S NORMAL AVE
20		25281060220000		11959 S NORMAL AVE
21		25281060230000		11912 S EGGLESTON AVE
22		25281060310000		11934 S EGGLESTON AVE
23		25281060320000		11936 S EGGLESTON AVE
24		25281070100000		11913 S EGGLESTON AVE
25		25281070180000		11935 S EGGLESTON AVE
26		25281070350000		11948 S STEWART AVE
27		25281070360000		11952 S STEWART AVE
28		25281110140000		12037 S LOWE AVE
29		25281120110000		12027 S WALLACE ST
30		25281120140000		12037 S WALLACE ST
31		25281120150000		12041 S WALLACE ST
32		25281120160000		12043 S WALLACE ST
33		25281120280000		12018 S PARNELL AVE
34		25281130170000		12039 SPARNELL AVE
35		25281130360000		12038 S NORMAL AVE
36		25281130400000		12050 S NORMAL AVE
37		25281130410000		12054 S NORMAL AVE
38		25281140060000		12017 S NORMAL AVE
39		25281140080000		12023 S NORMAL AVE
40		25281140090000		12025 S NORMAL AVE
41		25281140180000		12055 S NORMAL AVE
42		25281140220000		12014 S EGGLESTON AVE
43		25281140230000		12014 5 EGGLESTON AVE
44		25281140270000		12030 S EGGLESTON AVE
45		25281140300000		12042 S EGGLESTON AVE
46		25281140310000		12044 S EGGLESTON AVE
47		25281150210000		12022 S STEWART AVE
48		25281180150000		12100 S LOWE AVE
49		25281190130000		12137 S LOWE AVE
ft	PIN		ADDRESS
50	25281190200000		12157 S LOWE AVE
51	25281190290000		12126 S WALLACE ST
52	25281190300000		12128 S WALLACE ST
53	25281190350000		12144 S WALLACE ST
54	25281200050000		12111 S WALLACE ST
55	25281200350000		12152 SPARNELL AVE
56	25281210020000		12101 S PARNELL AVE
57	25281210090000		12129 SPARNELL AVE
58	25281210220000		12118 S NORMAL AVE
59	25281210320000		12152 S NORMAL AVE
60	25281210330000		12156 S NORMAL AVE
61	25281210360000		12104 S NORMAL AVE
62	25281220010000		12101 S NORMAL AVE
63	25281220020000		12103 S NORMAL AVE
64	25281220050000		12115 S NORMAL AVE
65	25281220080000		12125 S NORMAL AVE
66	25281220110000		12131 S NORMAL AVE
67	25281220310000		12154 S EGGLESTON AVE
68	25281220350000		12136 S EGGLESTON AVE
69	25281230020000		12103 S EGGLESTON AVE
70	25281230090000		12131 S EGGLESTON AVE
71	25281230130000		12145 S EGGLESTON AVE
72	25281250030000		12209 S EMERALD AVE
73	25281250040000		12213 S EMERALD AVE
74	25281250070000		12221S EMERALD AVE
75	25281250290000		12242 S UNION AVE
76	25281250300000		12246 S UNION AVE
77	25281250310000		12248 S UNION AVE
78	25281250320000		12250 S UNION AVE
79	25281260020000		12209 S UNION AVE
80	25281260050000		12221 S UNION AVE
81	25281260060000		12221S UNION AVE
82	25281260070000		12225 S UNION AVE
83	25281260080000		12227 S UNION AVE
84	25281260090000		12229 S UNION AVE
85	25281260100000		12231 S UNION AVE
86	25281260110000		12233 S UNION AVE
87	25281260130000		12241S UNION AVE
88	25281260160000		12240 S LOWE AVE
89	25281270250000		12218 S WALLACE ST
90	25281270270000		12224 S WALLACE ST
91	25281270330000		12246 S WALLACE ST
92	25281270410000		12225 S JUSTINE ST
93	25281270450000		12257 S LOWE AVE
94	25281280050000		12215 S WALLACE ST
95	25281280080000		12221 S WALLACE ST
96	25281280110000		12231 S WALLACE ST
97	25281280150000		12241 S WALLACE ST
98	25281280160000		12243 S WALLACE ST

A-6      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan

38      March 28, 2014

TABLE 9A LAND ACQUISITION BY BLOCK AND PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

#	PIN	ADDRESS
99	25281280200000	12255 S WALLACE ST
100	25281280250000	12210 SPARNELL AVE
101	25281280280000	548 W 123RD ST
102	25281280290000	12259 S WALLACE ST
103	25281290220000	12212 S NORMAL AVE
104	25281290340000	12252 S NORMAL AVE
10S	25281300060000	12219 S NORMAL AVE
106	25281300070000	12221 S NORMAL AVE
107	25281310030000	12209 S EGGLESTON AVE
108	25282010320000	11948 S PRINCETON AVE
109	25282020170000	11951 S PRINCETON AVE
110	25282020280000	11940 S YALE AVE
111	25282050020000	121 W 119TH ST
112	25282050030000	117 W 119TH ST
113	25282050430000	119 W 119TH ST
114	25282080240000	12044 S HARVARD AVE
115	25282100110000	12037 S PRINCETON AVE
116	25282100240000	12024 S YALE AVE
117	25282100280000	12038 S YALE AVE
118	25282160010000	12103 S STEWART AVE
119	25282160320000	12132 S STEWART AVE
120	25282170260000	12144 S PRINCETON AVE
121	25282180030000	12107 S PRINCETON AVE
122	25283000070000	12325 S HALSTED ST
123	25283000350000	12346 S EMERALD AVE
124	25283010070000	12323 S EMERALD AVE
12S	25283010100000	12331 S EMERALD AVE
126	25283010110000	12333 S EMERALD AVE
127	25283010120000	12335 S EMERALD AVE
128	25283020590000	12324 S LOWE AVE
129	25283030020000	611 W 123RD ST
130	25283030240000	12333 S LOWE AVE
131	25283030300000	12342 S WALLACE ST
132	25283040060000	545 W 123RD ST
133	25283040130000	12325 S WALLACE ST
134	25283040230000	12351 S WALLACE ST
135	25283040250000	12357 S WALLACE ST
136	25283040270000	12318 S PARNELL AVE
137	25283040330000	12334 S PARNELL AVE
138	25283040340000	12336 SPARNELL AVE
139	25283040370000	12348 SPARNELL AVE
140	25283050030000	523 W 123RD ST
141	25283050040000	519W123RDST
142	25283050050000	513 W123RD ST
143	25283050060000	511 W 123RD ST
144	25283050130000	12319 SPARNELL AVE
145	25283050140000	12323 SPARNELL AVE
146	25283050170000	12321 S PARNELL AVE
147	25283050200000	12337 SPARNELL AVE
tt	PIN		ADDRESS
148	25283050320000		12324 S NORMAL AVE
149	25283050350000		12332 S NORMAL AVE
150	25283050360000		12334 S NORMAL AVE
151	25283080010000		12401 S HALSTED ST
152	25283080020000		12403 S HALSTED ST
153	25283080030000		12405 S HALSTED ST
154	25283080040000		12409 S HALSTED ST
155	25283080050000		12411 S HALSTED ST
156	25283080060000		12413 S HALSTED ST
157	25283090270000		12414 S UNION AVE
158	25283100450000		12432 S LOWE AVE
159	25283120010000		559 W 123RD ST
160	25283120020000		551 W 124TH ST
161	25283120040000		12400 SPARNELL AVE
162	25283120050000		12406 SPARNELL AVE
163	25283120150000		12434 SPARNELL AVE
164	25283120200000		12452 SPARNELL AVE
165	25283130100000		12431 SPARNELL AVE
166	25283130160000		12449 SPARNELL AVE
167	25283130200000		12400 S NORMAL AVE
168	25283140540000		12435 S NORMAL AVE
169	25283140580000		12445 S NORMAL AVE
170	25283140610000		12403 S NORMAL AVE
171	25283150050000		12427 S EGGLESTON AVE
172	25283150060000		12427 S EGGLESTON AVE
173	25283160080000		12513 S HALSTED ST
174	25283160090000		12515 S HALSTED ST
175	25283220270000		12604 S EMERALD AVE
176	25283220590000		12624 S EMERALD AVE
177	25283220630000		12635 S HALSTED ST
178	25283230470000		12658 S UNION AVE
179	25284000080000		12329 S PRINCETON AVE
180	25322070630000		12824 S MORGAN ST
181	25322070640000		12826 S MORGAN ST
182	25322070680000		12848 S MORGAN ST
183	25322070710000		12920 S MORGAN ST
184	25322070720000		12866 S MORGAN ST
185	25322130250000		12848 S HALSTED ST
186	25322130260000		12848 S HALSTED ST
187	25322130270000		12848 S HALSTED ST
188	25322130280000		12848 S HALSTED ST
189	25331010130000		12763 S HALSTED ST
190	25331010530000		12819 S HALSTED ST
191	25331020030000		721 W VERMONT ST
192	25331100150000		12905 S HALSTED ST
193	25331100160000		12907 S HALSTED ST
194	25331100170000		12909 S HALSTED ST
195	25331100180000		12911 S HALSTED ST
196	25331100190000		12915 S HALSTED ST

A-7      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan

39      March 28, 2014

TABLE 9A LAND ACQUISITION BY BLOCK AND PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

#	PIN	ADDRESS
197	25331100200000	12917 S HALSTED ST
198	25331100210000	12919 S HALSTED ST
199	25331100220000	12921 S HALSTED ST
200	25331100230000	12925 S HALSTED ST
201	25331100240000	12927 S HALSTED ST

ft	PIN	ADDRESS
202	25331100250000	12963 S HALSTED ST
203	25331170030000	12945 S HALSTED ST
204	25331170040000	12947 S HALSTED ST
205	25331170050000	12949 S HALSTED ST

A-8      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan

40      March 28, 2014

Corrected Appendix B - April 29, 2014

119th / HALSTED TIF DISTRICT

1. ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 20, 21, 28, 32, 33 (NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE) AND 29 IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
2. BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. WITH THE CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST.;
3. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST. TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE 8 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF STANLEY MATHEWS SUBDIVISION IN THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, SAID LINE BEING ALSO THE CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING SAID LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION;
4. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE LINE 8 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY;
5. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CENTER LINE OF 117th ST.;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 117th ST. TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY LYING EAST AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 12 THROUGH 35, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 1 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
7. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th ST.;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th ST. TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK 2 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.;
4. THENCE WEST ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF PEORIA ST. WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 29 AND 18 IN BLOCK 4 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF BLOCKS 8 & 11 AND ALL OF BLOCKS 9 & 10, EXCEPT LOTS 19, 22, AND 23 OF BLOCK 10 OF THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
5. THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 29 AND 18 IN BLOCK 4 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF SANGAMON ST.;
6. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF SANGAMON ST. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 19, 20

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

-2-

|

AND 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF BLOCKS 8 & 11 AND ALL OF BLOCKS 9 & 10, EXCEPT LOTS 19, 22, AND 23 OF BLOCK 10 OF THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 19, 20 AND 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION;
2. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 18 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 18 AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF MORGAN ST.;
4. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF MORGAN ST. TO THE NORTH LINE OF 119th ST.;
5. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF 119th ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.;
6. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE PEORIA ST. TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION;
7. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;
8. THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH LINE OF 120th ST.;
9. THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 8 OF SAID FIRST ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001 /Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 8 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 18;
2. THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET ALONG THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE;
3. THENCE 142 FEET, MORE OR LESS, WESTERLY TO THE EAST LINE OF VACATED GREEN ST.;

THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF VACATED GREEN ST. TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD;

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.;
2. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD;
3. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST.; ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 123rd ST.;
4. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 123rd ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST.;
5. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.);
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 127^th ST. (BURR OAK ST.) TO THE WEST LINE OF PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART LYING NORTH OF THE LITTLE CALUMET RIVER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (EXCEPT THE WEST 25 ACRES THEREOF) OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;

-4-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION;
2. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NEW ROSELAND SUBDIVISION NO. 2, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
3. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID NEW ROSELAND SUBDIVISION NO. 2, TO THE WEST LINE OF HALSTED ST.;
4. THENCE EAST TO THE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF HALSTED ST. WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND, BEGIN A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 33, NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE AND PART OF FRACTIONAL SECTIONS 28 AND 33, SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
5. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOTS IN NEW ROSELAND TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 16 FEET OF LOT 38 IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND AFORESAID;
6. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST 16 FEET OF LOT 38 IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 129™ PL;
7. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF 129™ PL. AFORESAID WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARNELL AVE.;
8. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF 129™ PL. TO THE EAST LINE OF UNION AVE.;
9. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF UNION AVE. TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST.;
10. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST. TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001 /Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, TO THE CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.);
2. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD;
3. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST.;
4. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF YALE AVE.;
5. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF YALE AVE. TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN WEST PULLMAN, SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF WEST PULLMAN LYING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
6. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST., BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2^nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST 13.565 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
7. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. AND THE WEST LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2^nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 105;
8. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2^nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON TO THE WEST LINE OF STATE ST.;

-6-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF STATE ST. WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 6 FEET OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 9 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH 20 ACRES OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 EXCEPT THE NORTH 4 ACRES, ALSO THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 EXCEPT THE RAILROAD, ALSO THE WEST FRACTIONAL HALF OF SECTION 27 EXCEPT THE RAILROAD, ALL NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, ALSO THE NORTH 21 ACRES OF THE NORTHEAST FRACTIONAL QUARTER OF SECTION 28 LYING SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 6 FEET OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 26 AFORESAID;
3. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION AFORESAID;
4. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVE.;
5. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST. IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST., AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID;
7. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

-7-

j

2. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, TO THE EAST LINE OF STATE ST.;
3. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 19 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART LYING EAST OF THE WEST 49 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
4. THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 19 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 19;
5. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 30 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 30 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, TO THE EAST LINE OF LAFAYETTE AVE.;
7. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK 6 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID;
8. THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK 6 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, TO THE EAST LINE OF JAMES R. MANN'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 7, 8 & 9 IN ALLEN'S SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST 49 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
9. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF JAMES R. MANN'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST.;

65)      THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HARVARD AVE.;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

-8-

1. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HARVARD AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 6 IN A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, A SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO CENTER LINE OF STEWART AVE.;
3. THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF STEWART AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 6 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN HUGH LAUDER'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT 8 IN BLOCK 5 IN SAID A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN;
4. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF EGGLESTON AVE.;
5. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF EGGLESTON AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 10 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 4 IN SAID A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF NORMAL AVE.;
7. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF NORMAL AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 4 IN HANNAH B. GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST

-9-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 28 IN BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE EAST LINE OF LOT 28 IN BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN AND THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th PL.;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th PL. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO WEST OF AND ADJOINING THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN;
4. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th ST.;
5. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 170 THROUGH 165, INCLUSIVE, IN SHARPSHOOTER'S PARK SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SHARPSHOOTER'S PARK, SAID PARK BEING THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
6. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST.;
7. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST.;
8. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 114th ST.;

- 10-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 114th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH GREEN ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 16 THROUGH 30, INCLUSIVE, IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION, A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH GREEN ST. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE SAID LOT 30 IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE SOUTH LINE SAID LOT 30 IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 31 IN SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION;
4. THENCE CONTINUING WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 31 IN SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION;
5. THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION, SAID WEST LINE BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF AN 8 FOOT ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH PEORIA ST., TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE 16 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 19 AND 20 IN THE SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST TWO THIRDS OF THE WEST THREE EIGHTS OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG A LINE 16 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 19 AND 20 IN THE SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION, SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE BEING ALSO A LINE 8 FEET SOUTHWEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 20 THROUGH 23, INCLUSIVE IN SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

- 11 -

i i

I

2. THENCE NORTHWEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION, SAID POINT BEING 1,032.98 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
3. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, SAID POINT BEING 1,188.76 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20;
4. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20 TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD;
5. THENCE NORTHWEST ALONG SAID THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF 111th ST.;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 111th ST. TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD;
7. THENCE SOUTHEAST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST.;
8. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST.

94)      ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

- 12-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

APPENDIX C

119^IH & HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA ELIGIBILITY STUDY - AMENDMENT NO. 2

Overview

On February 6, 2002 the City of Chicago City Council adopted the 119th and Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project (119^th and Halsted TIF) followed by Amendment No. 1, adopted April 9, 2003 to amend language and data in the Redevelopment Plan and Project. At the time of original adoption, the 119' & Halsted TIF included substantially all the area that qualified for inclusion into the district. In the intervening years, conditions in the area south and east of the 119^th and Halsted TIF declined. This decline accelerated due to the economic distress, foreclosures and increased vacancy brought about by the recession of 2007-2008. Conditions have not improved in recent years. Private sector investment is minimal and without public intervention, this area south and east of the 119^th & Halsted TIF will continue to decline. As a result, the City of Chicago proposes to amend the 119^th & Halsted TIF to expand the boundaries to the south and east, allowing the benefits of tax increment financing to be used to advance revitalization.

Camiros, Ltd. and Applied Real Estate Analysis (collectively referred to as the "Consultants") have been engaged to determine whether the approximately 407 acres of land located to the south and east of the 119^th and Halsted TIF qualifies for designation as a Redevelopment Project Area as either a "conservation area" or as a "blighted area" as set forth in the "Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act" (65 LLCS 5/11-74.1 et seq.), as amended (the "Act"). The purpose of this study is to determine whether a portion of the City of Chicago identified as the Amendment Area qualifies for designation as a tax increment financing district within the definitions set forth under the Act. The Act provides municipalities with tools needed to foster revitalization in order to eliminate or reduce blighted or rapidly deteriorating areas through the implementation of a redevelopment plan. The Act authorizes the use of tax increment revenues derived in a redevelopment project area for the payment or reimbursement of eligible Redevelopment Project Costs.

The area proposed for designation as the 119^th and Halsted Amendment No. 2 Amendment Area is hereinafter referred to as the "Study Area" and is shown in Figure A: Study Area Boundary. The 119^th & Halsted TIF, adopted by the City Council on February 6, 2002, shall be hereafter referred to as the "Original Project Area."

The Study Area is located entirely within the West Pullman Community Area. It is approximately 407 acres in size and consists of 2,450 tax parcels located on 86 full and partial tax blocks. The Study Area is comprised of two separate areas, the east area and the south area. The "east area" is located east of the Original Project Area, extending five blocks east of Wentworth Avenue one-half block north and south of 119^th Street. The east area's eastern limit terminates at the western property line of properties fronting onto Michigan Avenue. The "south area" is located south of the Original Project Area. The south area's boundaries are irregularly shaped, with

C-1      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan

49      December 31, 2013

Revised March 28, 2014

 

Study Area      

City of Chicago      ~      ■      .       •

119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2      g\ ^Cam,rOS

119"¹ and Halsted TIF

50      Second Amended Plan

December 31, 20/3 Revised March 28, 2014

boundaries generally defined Halsted Street and Carpenter Street on the west; Yale Street, the Major Taylor Trail and Union Street on the east, the Calumet River, 129^th Street, 127^th Street and 125^th Street on the South, and the Original Project Area boundaries on the north.

This report summarizes the analyses and findings of the consultants' work, which is the responsibility of the consultants. The consultants have prepared this report with the understanding that the City would rely: 1) on the findings and conclusions of this report in proceeding with the designation of the Study Area as a redevelopment project area under the Act; and 2) on the fact that the consultants have obtained the necessary information to conclude that the Study Area can be designated as a redevelopment project area in compliance with the Act.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act permits municipalities to induce redevelopment of eligible "blighted," "conservation" or "industrial park conservation areas" in accordance with an adopted redevelopment plan. The Act stipulates specific procedures, which must be adhered to, in designating a redevelopment project area. One of those procedures is the determination that the area meets the statutory eligibility requirements. At 65 Sec 5/1 l-74.-3(p), the Act defines a "redevelopment project area" as follows:

"... an area designated by the municipality, which is not less in the aggregate than 1-1/2 acres and in respect to which the municipality has made a finding that there exist conditions which cause the area to be classified as an industrial park conservation area or a blighted area or a conservation area, or combination of both blighted areas and conservation areas."

In adopting this legislation, the Illinois General Assembly found:

1. (at 65 Sec 5/11-74.4-2(a)) ...there exist in many municipalities within the State blighted, conservation and industrial park conservation areas...; and
2. (at 65 Sec 5/1 l-74.4-2(b)) ...the eradication of blighted areas and the treatment and improvement of conservation areas by... redevelopment projects is hereby declared to be essential to the public interest.

The legislative findings were made on the basis that the presence of blight, or conditions that lead to blight, is detrimental to the safety, health, welfare and morals of the public. The Act specifies certain requirements, which must be met, before a municipality may proceed with implementing a redevelopment project in order to ensure that the exercise of these powers is proper and in the public interest.

C-3 51

Before the tax increment financing technique can be used, the municipality must first determine that the proposed redevelopment area qualifies for designation as a "blighted area," "conservation area," or an "industrial park conservation area." Based on the conditions present, this Eligibility Report finds that the Study Area qualifies for designation as a conservation area.

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Conservation Areas

A "conservation area" is an improved area located within the territorial limits of the municipality in which 50% or more of the structures have an age of 35 years or more. Such areas are not yet blighted but, because of a combination of three or more of the following conditions that are detrimental to the public safety, health, morals or welfare, may become a blighted area:

• Dilapidation
• Deterioration
• Obsolescence
• Presence of structures below minimum code standards
• Illegal use of individual structures
• Excessive vacancies
• Lack of ventilation, light or sanitary facilities
• Inadequate utilities
• Excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities
• Deleterious land use or layout
• Lack of community planning
• Environmental clean-up requirements
• Declining or stagnant equalized assessed value

The Act defines blighted and conservation areas and amendments to the Act also provide guidance as to when the conditions present qualify an area for such designation. Where any of the conditions defined in the Act are found to be present in the Study Area, they must be 1) documented to be present to a meaningful extent so that the municipality may reasonably find that the condition is clearly present within the intent of the Act, and 2) reasonably distributed throughout the vacant or improved part of the Study Area, as applicable, to which each condition pertains.

The test of eligibility of the Study Area is based on the conditions of the area as a whole. The Act does not require that eligibility be established for each and every property in the Study Area.

C-4      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan

52      December 31, 2013

Revised March 28, 2014

2.

ELIGIBILITY STUDIES AND ANALYSIS

An analysis was undertaken to determine whether any or all of the blighting conditions listed in the Act are present in the Study Area, and if so, to what extent and in which locations. In order to accomplish this evaluation the following tasks were undertaken:

1. Exterior survey of the condition and use of each building;
2. Field survey of property conditions involving parking facilities, public infrastructure, site access, fences and general property maintenance;
3. Analysis of existing land uses and their relationships;
4. Comparison of surveyed buildings to zoning regulations;
5. Analysis of the current platting, building size and layout;
6. Analysis of building floor area and site coverage;
7. Review of previously prepared plans, studies, inspection reports and other data;
8. Analysis of real estate assessment data;
9. Review of available building permit records to determine the level of development activity in the area; and
10. Review of building code violations.

The exterior building condition survey and site conditions survey of the Study Area were undertaken in May and October of 2013. The analysis of site conditions was organized by tax block. There are a total of 2450 tax parcels and 1,991 principal buildings on 86 tax blocks within the Study Area.

Building Condition Evaluation

This section summarizes the process used for assessing building conditions in the Study Area. These standards and criteria were used to evaluate the existence of dilapidation or deterioration of structures.

The building condition analysis is based on a thorough exterior inspection of the buildings and sites conducted by Applied Real Estate Analysis, Inc. and Camiros, Ltd. in May and October of 2013. Structural deficiencies in building components and related environmental deficiencies in the Study Area were noted during the survey. A total of 1,991 principle buildings were identified and surveyed.

Building Components Evaluated

During the field survey, each component of the buildings in the Study Area was examined to determine whether it was in sound condition or had minor, major, or critical defects. Building components examined were of two types:

Primary Structural Components

These include the basic elements of any building: foundation walls, load-bearing walls and columns, roof, roof structures and facades.

C-5

53

/19"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan

December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Secondary Components

These are components generally added to the primary structural components and are necessary parts of the building, including exterior and interior stairs, windows and window units, doors and door units, interior walls, chimney, and gutters and downspouts.

Each primary and secondary component was evaluated separately as a basis for determining the overall condition of individual buildings. This evaluation considered the relative importance of specific components within a building and the effect that deficiencies in components will have on the remainder of the building.

Building Component Classification

The four categories used in classifying building components and systems and the criteria used in evaluating structural deficiencies are described below.

Sound

Building components that contain no defects beyond normal maintenance, are adequately maintained, and require no treatment outside of normal ongoing maintenance.

Minor Deficient

Building components containing minor defects (loose or missing material or holes and cracks over a limited area), which often may be corrected through the course of normal maintenance. Minor defects have no real effect on either the primary or secondary components and the correction of such defects may be accomplished by the owner or occupants. Examples include tuckpointing masonry joints over a limited area or replacement of less complicated components. Minor defects are not considered in rating a building as structurally substandard.

Major Deficient

Building components containing major defects over a widespread area, which would be difficult or costly to correct through normal maintenance. Buildings in the major deficient category would require replacement or rebuilding of components by people skilled in the building trades.

Dilapidated

Building components containing severe defects (bowing, sagging, or settling to any or all exterior components causing the structure to be out-of-plumb, or broken, loose or missing material and deterioration over a widespread area) so extensive that the cost of repair would be excessive. The cost of repairs needed to bring such buildings into sound condition would likely exceed the value of the building and would not represent a prudent use of funds.

Final Building Ratings Sound

Sound buildings can be kept in a standard condition with normal maintenance. Buildings so classified have no minor defects.

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Deteriorated

Deteriorated buildings contain defects that collectively are not easily correctable and cannot be accomplished in the course of normal maintenance. Buildings classified as deteriorated have more than one minor defect, but no major defects.

Dilapidated

Structurally substandard buildings contain defects that are so serious and so extensive that the building may need to be removed. Buildings classified as dilapidated or structurally substandard have two or more major defects.

Eligibility Determination

In order to establish the eligibility of a redevelopment project area under the "conservation area" criteria established in the Act, at least 50% of buildings must be 35 years of age or older and at least three of 13 eligibility conditions must be meaningfully present and reasonably distributed throughout the Study Area.

The determination of the eligibility conditions being present to a meaningfully extent varies with each eligibility condition. The presence of some eligibility conditions exerts a stronger impact on the health of a community than others. For example, dilapidation, which is a severely advanced state of building deterioration, exerts a stronger blighting influence than simple deterioration. Consequently, the threshold for dilapidation being present to a major extent is lower than that of deterioration. Less incidence of dilapidation is required to make it present to a major extent relative to deterioration. The determination of presence to a major extent is presented in the individual assessment of each eligibility condition within this Appendix C.

Each condition identified in the Act for determining whether an area qualifies as a conservation area is discussed below. A conclusion is presented as to whether or not the condition is present in the Study Area to a degree sufficient to warrant its inclusion as a blighting condition in establishing the eligibility of the Study Area for designation as a redevelopment project area under the Act. These findings describe the conditions that exist and the extent to which each condition is present.

/19"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

3. PRESENCE    AND    DISTRIBUTION    OF ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS

This Eligibility Study finds that the Study Area qualifies for designation as a conservation area under the criteria contained in the Act. The Study Area qualifies because the required age threshold is satisfied with 97% of buildings being at least 35 years of age and because six of the thirteen conditions cited in the Act are meaningfully present and reasonably distributed within the Study Area. These conditions are as follows:

• Deterioration
• Obsolescence
• Excessive vacancies
• Excessive land coverage or overcrowding of community facilities
• Lack of community planning
• Lagging or declining equalized assessed valuation

The presence and distribution of eligibility conditions related to the qualification of the Study Area for designation as an improved conservation area are presented below. Maps of the first six of these eligibility conditions are presented at the end of this Appendix C, along with a map of building age. The distribution of these conditions within the Study Area is presented in Table B: Distribution of Conservation Area Eligibility Conditions of this Appendix C. Figure B: Existing Land Use, provides context for the eligibility study by illustrating the pattern of existing land use within the Amendment Area.

Age

The Study Area contains a total of 1,991 principal buildings, with 1,931 of these identified as having been built in 1978 or earlier. Thus, the required age threshold is met with 97% of buildings being 35 years of age or older. Building age is shown graphically on Figure C.

Conservation Area Eligibility Conditions

The presence and distribution of eligibility conditions related to the qualification of the Study Area for designation as a conservation area are discussed below.

1. Dilapidation

As defined in the Act, "dilapidation" refers to an advanced state of disrepair or neglect of necessary repairs to the primary structural components of buildings or improvements in such a combination that a documented building condition analysis determines that major repair is required or the defects are so serious and so extensive that rehabilitation is not practical or economically feasible. Such structures typically exhibit major structural fatigue such as leaning or warped walls, severe cracking in walls and foundations, and bowed or sagging roofs.

C-8      119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan

56      December 31,2013

Revised March 28, 2014

Dilapidation was found to be present to a minor extent within the Study Area, affecting 26 tax blocks, representing 30% of total tax blocks in the Study Area. A total of 59 principal buildings were classified as dilapidated during the eligibility analysis, representing 3% of all buildings. The relatively small numbers of blighted buildings belies the significance of dilapidation within the Study Area. Dilapidated buildings are safety hazards and facilitate various types of criminal activity. The presence of dilapidated buildings is a very visible signal of neighborhood decline and serves as a disincentive for property maintenance and reinvestment. Even one dilapidated property on a block can have negative consequences on other properties. The blighting influence of dilapidated buildings is so strong that such buildings cannot be allowed to stand, to perpetuate blight within the neighborhood, and are demolished. For this reason, dilapidated buildings are not found in great numbers in a neighborhood. The vast majority of the 234 vacant lots currently within the Study Area were once dilapidated buildings that have been demolished. Dilapidated buildings are part of the progression of physical deterioration, which starts with deferred maintenance, then advances to building deterioration, and finally results in dilapidation, necessitating demolition and producing vacant lots. Thus, despite of the relatively low numbers of dilapidated buildings in the Study Area, this factor was found to be present to a minor degree, and contributes to qualifying the area as a "blighted area."

Conclusion: This condition was found in 31% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a minor extent and was not used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act.

2. Deterioration

Based on the definition given by the Act, deterioration refers to any physical deficiencies or disrepair in buildings or site improvements requiring treatment or repair. As defined in the Act, "deterioration" refers to, with respect to buildings, defects including but not limited to major defects in the secondary building components such as doors, windows, porches, gutters and downspouts, and fascia. With respect to surface improvements, the condition of roadways, alleys, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking, and surface storage areas are deteriorated, including but not limited to surface cracking, crumbling, potholes, depressions, loose paving material, and weeds protruding through paved surfaces.

Deterioration was found to be present to a major extent within the Study Area, affecting 81 tax of 86 blocks, or 94% of tax blocks in the Study Area. A total of 896 parcels were found to evidence deterioration in buildings or property improvements, representing 45% of all buildings. These buildings exhibit deterioration with respect to principal and/or accessory buildings, site improvements and adjacent deteriorated right-of-way conditions, which can take the form of streets without curbs and gutters, deteriorated pavement on public streets, alleys, sidewalks as well as cracked and crumbling curbs and gutters. The vast majority of deterioration found in the Study Area was related to deteriorated building components, including cracks in foundation and brick walls, rotten or sagging wood facades, deteriorated or broken windows and doors, deteriorated roof components and porches, and cracked or missing surface tile or brick. The presence of dilapidation is shown graphically on Figure D.

119"' andHalsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Conclusion: This condition was found in 94% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a major extent and was used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act.

3. Obsolescence

As defined in the Act, "obsolescence" refers to "the condition or process of falling into disuse, or where structures have become ill suited for the original use". Obsolescence can occur in response to a variety of factors. Most often, the standard of improvement for given uses improves, or becomes higher, over the course of time. Uses that are not improved or upgraded over the course of time often become obsolete. Market forces play a large role in the process of obsolescence. When the market for particular uses declines, there is little or no financial incentive to make improvement to properties. In the absence of improvements made over the course of time, properties fall further and further behind the current standard and become obsolete.

Obsolete buildings contain characteristics or deficiencies that limit their long-term sound use or reuse. Obsolescence in such buildings is typically difficult and expensive to correct. Obsolete building types have an adverse affect on nearby and surrounding development and detract from the physical, functional and economic vitality of the area.

Obsolescence was found to be present to a major extent in the Study Area, affecting 75 tax blocks, or 87% of tax blocks in the Study Area. A total of 697 buildings/properties were found to be obsolete, representing 35% of all buildings. The most significant form of obsolescence is represented in older residential buildings, mostly single-family dwellings. These residential buildings evidence obsolescence by virtue of some or all of the following conditions: a) buildings spaced too closely together: b) outdated in terms of size/layout; c) poor building condition/lack of maintenance and upgrades; and d) building age (built in 1930 or before). In general, the types of residential buildings possessing these characteristics are far below the current standard for residential design and construction. The analysis of obsolescence conducted determined that properties with two or more of these conditions constituted obsolescence. The residential areas where obsolescence was most concentrated are areas where building took place prior to annexation to Chicago and prior to the adoption of any zoning code.

Economic obsolescence is also present. These housing units do not compete well in the market for buyers and renters because they are far below the modern housing standard. There is reduced incentive to reinvest in these buildings in terms of maintenance and renovation due to the outdated layouts and generally poor quality of construction. The result is increasing building deterioration, which leads to dilapidation and, eventually, demolition. The presence of obsolescence is shown graphically on Figure E.

In addition to older residential buildings, this condition is also evidenced by obsolete commercial buildings/properties, and to a lesser extent, industrial properties. Properties along 119^th Street in the east portion of the Study Area, and along Halsted Street in the south portion of the Study Area, are predominantly obsolete. Obsolescence along 119^th Street is a function of this street losing its viability as a commercial district. This occurred at least 20 years ago, and buildings originally designed for commercial use are no longer well suited to market conditions. Vacancy within such commercial buildings is widespread. Residential buildings along 119^th Street are

C-10 58

119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

also predominantly obsolete because they meet the criteria outlined above for obsolete residential buildings.

In the south area, Halsted Street has also been affected by a declining commercial market and the resulting loss of viability. The commercial viability of Halsted Street, while fairly strong further to the north, declines as one approaches the Calumet River. South of the Calumet River, in the City of Calumet Park, there are no commercial uses on Halsted Street, but rather a forest preserve, a golf course and other non-commercial and non-residential uses. The absence of residential use along the Halsted Street Corridor south of the Calumet River reduces consumer support for commercial uses within the Study Area. The commercial district terminates at the Calumet River and market support for commercial use along Halsted Street is weak. The location of the Cedar park Cemetery, which occupies the west side of Halsted Street from 123^rd Street to 127^th Street, acts to further weaken market demand by separating area residents from Halsted Street and diluting the synergy of the commercial district. The presence of religious institutions, vacant land and buildings, and auto repair/used car sales is clear evidence that the market for commercial use along the Halsted Street Corridor s weak.

Conclusion: This condition was found in 87% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a major extent and was used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act.

1. Presence of Structures Below Minimum Code Standards

As defined in the Act, the "presence of structures below minimum code standards" refers to all structures that do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire, and other governmental codes applicable to property, but not including housing and property maintenance codes.

As referenced in the definition above, the principal purposes of governmental codes applicable to properties are to require buildings to be constructed in such a way as to sustain safety of loads expected from the type of occupancy; to be safe for occupancy against fire and similar hazards; and/or to establish minimum standards essential for safe and sanitary habitation. Structures below minimum code standards are characterized by defects or deficiencies that threaten health and safety.

Evidence of structures below minimum code standards was not found to be present to a major extent.

Conclusion: This condition was not found to be present within the Study Area and was not used to establish eligibility as a blighted area under the Act.

1. Illegal Use of Structures

There is an illegal use of a structure when structures are used in violation of federal, state or local laws.

C-l 1

59

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Conclusion: This condition was found to be present within the Study Area to a limited degree and was not used to establish eligibility as a blighted area under the Act.

1. Excessive Vacancies

As defined in the Act, "excessive vacancies" refers to the presence of buildings that are unoccupied or under-utilized and that represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent, or duration of the vacancies. Excessive vacancies include all or portions of buildings listed as for rent or sale where the space is unoccupied, abandoned properties that show no apparent effort directed toward their occupancy, or buildings that are vacant because they are dilapidated or structurally unsound.

Vacant buildings and vacant lots are widespread within the Study Area. There are a total of 234 vacant lots and 175 partially or completely vacant buildings within the Study Area, representing 9.5% of the total tax parcels and 8.8% of the total number of principal buildings. There are a total of 67 tax blocks containing vacant buildings within the Study Area, or 78% of the total number of tax blocks. Vacancy in buildings often occurs because the condition of the building is poor. Once vacant, the condition of the building often deteriorates until it is dilapidated and beyond rehabilitation. Thus, vacant lots are often a consequence of vacant buildings.

In addition to vacant residential buildings, vacancy within commercial storefront space is widespread, indicative of a weak retail market in certain areas. This is compounded by the fact that many of the vacant and underutilized buildings within the Study Area are also suffering from deterioration and obsolescence. Evidence of long-term vacancy is prevalent on particular sites, where weeds protrude through pavement and rotting boards cover windows. The presence of dilapidation is shown graphically on Figure F.

Conclusion: This condition was found in 78% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a major extent and was used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act.

1. Lack of Ventilation, Light, or Sanitary Facilities

As defined in the Act, "lack of ventilation, light, or sanitary facilities" refers to the absence of adequate ventilation for light or air circulation in spaces or rooms without windows, or that require the removal of dust, odor, gas, smoke, or other noxious airborne materials. Inadequate natural light and ventilation means the absence or inadequacy of skylights or windows for interior spaces or rooms and improper window sizes and amounts by room area to window area ratios. Inadequate sanitary facilities refer to the absence or inadequacy of garbage storage and enclosure, bathroom facilities, hot water and kitchens, and structural inadequacies preventing ingress and egress to and from all rooms and units within a building.

Conclusion: This condition was not identified as being present within the Study Area and was not used to establish eligibility as a blighted area under the Act.

C-12 60

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

8.      Inadequate Utilities

As defined in the Act, "inadequate utilities" refers to underground and overhead utilities such as storm sewers and storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and gas, telephone, and electrical services that are shown to be inadequate. Inadequate utilities are those that are (i) of insufficient capacity to serve the uses in the redevelopment project area, (ii) deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete, or in disrepair, or (iii) lacking within the redevelopment project area.

All properties within the Study Area are presently served by appropriate utilities. However, given the age of the area it is likely that some of these utilities are antiquated and in need of replacement. However, information needed to fully document the presence of this condition within the Study Area was not available.

Conclusion: The degree to which this condition is present within the Study Area was not documented as part of the eligibility analysis. Thus, the extent to which this condition may be present in the Study Area is unknown.

1. Excessive Land Coverage or Overcrowding of Community Facilities

As defined in the Act, "excessive land coverage or overcrowding of structures and community facilities" refers to the over-intensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities within a given area. Examples of problem conditions warranting the determination of an area as exhibiting excessive land coverage are (i) the presence of buildings either improperly situated on parcels or located on parcels of inadequate size and shape in relation to present- day standards of development for health and safety and (ii) the presence of multiple buildings on a single parcel. For there to be a finding of excessive land coverage, these parcels must exhibit one or more of the following conditions: a) insufficient provision for light and air within or around buildings; b) increased threat of spread of fire due to the close proximity of buildings; c) lack of adequate or proper access to a public right-of-way; d) lack of reasonably required off-street parking; or e) inadequate provision for loading and service.

This condition is present to a major degree within the Study Area. This condition is present on 72 tax blocks, or 84% of the total tax blocks in the Study Area. A total of 762 buildings evidenced excessive land coverage, representing 38% of all buildings. In many cases, the condition is present on many, or most, of the properties on a tax block. The presence of excessive land coverage is shown graphically on Figure G.

A variety of conditions were found that met the criteria for this factor, as defined in the Act, as shown on Figure H. The most common condition was residential buildings positioned too closely together and creating an increased threat of spread of fire. The properties identified on Figure 4 as representing an increased risk of fire exhibit the following characteristics:

• Buildings with less than five feet of separation to an adjacent building.
• Buildings of frame construction, with wood or vinyl side, and highly combustible.
• Buildings with windows opening onto the area of inadequate building separation.

119"' and Hoisted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

These characteristics clearly represent an increased risk of fire and do not meet modem standards for fire suppression. Current zoning standards require at least a three foot side yard for each building, and current building codes typically require more separation, depending on construction type, openings and other factors. In addition, residential buildings without adequate separation impact livability and market desirability. It is noteworthy that the areas within the Study Area with the highest concentrations of excessive land coverage area also those with the highest levels of vacant land/lots, vacant buildings and building deterioration.

Other characteristics were also found in the Study Area that met the criteria defined in the Act. The characteristic of properties lacking reasonably required parking was found on many of the commercial buildings/properties in the Study Area. Because the pattern of development in the Study Area is of a low-density nature, commercial trade depends on automobile traffic and commercial properties without parking are functionally deficient. Also, a small number of properties exhibited the characteristic in which the close spacing of adjacent buildings impaired the provision of air and light.

Conclusion: This condition was found in 84% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a major extent and was used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act.

1. Deleterious Land Use or Layout

As defined in the Act, "deleterious land-use or layout" refers to the existence of incompatible land-use relationships, buildings occupied by an inappropriate mix of uses, uses considered to be noxious, offensive, or unsuitable for the surrounding area, uses which are non-conforming with respect to current zoning, platting which does not conform to the current land use and infrastructure pattern, parcels of inadequate size or shape for contemporary development, and single buildings located on multiple parcels which have not been consolidated into a single building site.

Deleterious land use or layout was found to be present to a limited extent and does not affect a majority of tax blocks within the Study Area. This condition is evidenced by the presence of single buildings which cover multiple smaller parcels that have not been consolidated, as well as the presence of closely spaced commercial buildings which are of inadequate size in comparison to contemporary development. In addition, the presence of vacant land and buildings and the duration to which these properties have been vacant also have a deleterious effect on adjacent property. Several other factors contribute to deleterious conditions in the Study Area as well. A total of five properties were found to evidence deleterious land use, which took the form of incompatible uses in residential areas

Conclusion: This condition was found to be present to a limited extent within the Study Area. Therefore, this condition was not used to qualify the Study Area as a blighted area under the Act.

1. Environmental Clean-Up Requirements

As defined in the Act, "environmental clean-up" means that the area has incurred Illinois Environmental  Protection  Agency  or United  States Environmental  Protection Agency

C-14

62

119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or Federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area. Existing data was not found to substantiate the presence of significant environmental clean-up requirements, although it is very possible that industrial and former industrial uses located along the freight rail tracks contain hazardous material that requires remediation.

Conclusion: The degree to which this condition is present within the Study Area was not documented as part of the eligibility analysis. Thus, the extent to which this condition may be present in the Study Area is unknown.

12. Lack of Community Planning

As defined in the Act, "lack of community planning" means that the proposed redevelopment project area was developed prior to or without the benefit or guidance of a community plan. This means that the development occurred prior to the adoption by the municipality of a comprehensive or other community plan or that the plan was not followed at the time of the area's development. This condition must be documented by evidence of adverse or incompatible land-use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels of inadequate shape and size to meet contemporary development standards, or other evidence demonstrating an absence of effective community planning.

The Study Area is located entirely within in the West Pullman Community Area. Early development of this area began in the 1850's, and occurred well outside the limits of the City of Chicago at that time. Early development of the area took place in a number of distinct communities, including Kensington and the Village of Gano. Over time, the area became closely linked with the Town of Pullman, located directly to the east. In 1889, this area along with the Town of Pullman and other portions of what is now the South Side were annexed into the City of Chicago.

Much of the eastern portion of the Study Area was already developed when it was annexed into the City of Chicago in 1889. More than twenty years of additional development occurred before the adoption of the City's first zoning ordinance in 1923. In addition, substantial development occurred before the Burnham Plan of Chicaso in 1909. Therefore, this condition was found to be present to a major extent, affecting the Study Area as a whole.

It should be noted that the Study Area has benefited from community planning in recent times. However, many of the conditions that now plague the area are the result of original development, which occurred without the benefit of sound community planning. Therefore, while significant planning investment has been made in the Study Area over recent decades, original development done without the benefit of sound community planning has contributed significantly to the Study Area's current problems.

Conclusion: This condition was found to be present to a major extent within the Study Area. Therefore, this condition was used to qualify the Study Area as a blighted area under the Act.

C-15 63

119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December il, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

13. Lagging or Declining Equalized Assessed Value

As defined in the Act, this condition is present when the Study Area can be described by one of the following three conditions 1) the total equalized assessed value ("EAV") has declined in three of the last five years; 2) the total EAV is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years; or 3) the total EAV is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years for which information is available. Table A: Comparison of EAV Growth to Comsumer Price Index (CPI) compares the annual change in EAV of the Study Area with the balance of the City.

As shown in Table A, the total increase in EAV of property within the Study Area has lagged behind the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers in three of the last five years (2010, 2011, and 2012). While the Study Area's EAV declined in certain years, and lagged behind that of the City as a whole in certain years, the three years in which the Study Area's change in EAV was less than that of the CPI is the measure of EAV performance that meets the eligibility requirements of the Act. Therefore, this condition is present to a major extent, affecting the Study Area as a whole.

Table A

COMPARISON OF EAV GROWTH TO CONSUMER PRICE INDEX (CPI)

Year	Total EAV of Study Area		CPI Change, January; All Urban Consumers		Is the Study Area growing at a rate less than the CPI?
	Change	Index Level	Change*
1CHICAGO April 30, 2014 To the President and Members of the City Council: Your Committee on Finance having had under consideration One (1) ordinance authorizing Amendment #2 for the 119th/Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area. A.      An ordinance approving Amendment #2 to the Redevelopment Plan for the 119th/Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area. 02014-3245 Having had the same under advisement, begs leave to report and recommend that your Honorable Body pass the proposed Ordinance Transmitted Herewith This recommendation was concurred in by      (a (viva voce votej) of members of the committee with      dissenting vote(s)?       Respectfully submitted (signed^™ ^ 7 Chairman Document No. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF CHICAGO OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY OF CHICAGO RAHM EMANUEL MAYOR April 2,2014 TO THE HONORABLE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO Ladies and Gentlemen: At the request of the Commissioner of Planning and Development, I transmit herewith an ordinance amending the 119lh/Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project. Your favorable consideration of this ordinance will be appreciated.   Mayor Very truly yours,   AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE 119™ AND HALSTED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT AREA WHEREAS, under ordinances adopted on February 6,2002, and published in the Journal of Proceedings of the City Council of the City of Chicago (the "Journal") for such date at pages 78512 to 78658, and under the provisions of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4.1 et seg,., as amended (the "Act"), the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Chicago (the "City"): (i) approved a redevelopment plan and project (the "Original Plan") for a portion of the City known as "119th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area" (the "2002 Original Project Area") (the "Original Plan Ordinance"); (ii) designated the 2002 Original Project Area as a "redevelopment project area" within the requirements of the Act (the "Designation Ordinance"); and (iii) adopted tax increment financing for the 2002 Original Project Area (the "Adoption Ordinance") (the Original Plan Ordinance, the Designation Ordinance, and the Adoption Ordinance are collectively referred to herein as the "TIF Ordinances"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to an ordinance adopted on April 9, 2003, and published in the Journal for such date at pages 106129 to 106248, and under the provisions of the Act, the City Council of the City approved changes to the Original Plan's text ("Amendment No. 1" and, together with the Original Plan, the "First Amended Plan") to replace the 1999 equalized assessed valuation ("E.A.V.") with the 2000 E.A.V. to conform the Original Plan to Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(F) of the Act, and to make other minor changes; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens of the City for the City to encourage development of areas located adjacent to the 2002 Original Project Area by adding certain additional continuous parcels (the "2014 Additional Property") to the 2002 Original Project Area and designating such expanded project area as a redevelopment project area under the Act to be known as the 119th and Halsted TIF Redevelopment Amendment 2 Project Area (together with the 2002 Original Project Area, the "2014 Amended Project Area"); and WHEREAS, the City desires further to supplement and amend the First Amended Plan for the 2002 Original Project Area to provide for the redevelopment of the 2014 Amended Project Area; and WHEREAS, the City has caused to be prepared an eligibility study entitled "119th & Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Study - Amendment No. 2" (the "Eligibility Study") of the proposed 2014 Additional Property, which Eligibility Study confirms the existence within the 2014 Additional Property of various conservation factors and vacant blighted factors as set forth in the Act and supports a finding of eligibility of the 2014 Additional Property for designation as a Conservation Area and Vacant Blighted Area under the Act; and WHEREAS, the First Amended Plan and the "119th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2: December 31,2013" ("Amendment No. 2" and, together with the First Amended Plan, the "Second Amended Plan"), provides for the 2014 Amended Project Area and the new total estimated redevelopment project costs; and WHEREAS, a copy of Amendment No. 2 is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best interest of the citizens of the City for the City to implement Tax Increment Allocation Financing pursuant to the Act for the 2014 Amended Project 1 Area, which is described in Section 2 of this ordinance and is to be redeveloped pursuant to the Second Amended Plan; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission (the "Commission") of the City has heretofore been appointed by the Mayor of the City with the approval of its City Council (the City Council, referred to herein collectively with the Mayor as the "Corporate Authorities") (as codified in Section 2-124 of the City's Municipal Code) pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Commission is empowered by the Corporate Authorities to exercise certain powers enumerated in Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act, including the holding of certain public hearings required by the Act; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 5/11-74.4-4 and 5/11-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission, by authority of the Corporate Authorities, called a public hearing on October 17,2013, concerning approval of the Second Amended Plan, designation of the 2014 Amended Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the 2014 Amended Project Area pursuant to the Act; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 (including the Eligibility Study) was made available for public inspection and review pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act since January 3,2014, being a date not less than 10 days before the meeting of the Commission at which the Commission adopted Resolution 14-CDC-01 on January 14,2014, accepting the Second Amended Plan for review and fixing the time and place for a public hearing (the "Hearing"), at the offices of the City Clerk and the City's Department of Planning and Development; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act, notice of the availability of Amendment No. 2 (including the related eligibility report and, if applicable, the feasibility study, and the housing impact study) was sent by mail on January 21,2014, which is within a reasonable time after the adoption by the Commission of Resolution 14-CDC-01 to: (a) all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, were determined to be (i) located within the 2014 Amended Project Area and (ii) located within 750 feet of the boundaries of the 2014 Amended Project Area (or, if applicable, were determined to be the 750 residential addresses that were closest to the boundaries of the 2014 Amended Project Area); and (b) organizations and residents that were registered interested parties for such 2014 Amended Project Area; and WHEREAS, due notice of the Hearing was given pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-6 of the Act, said notice being given to all taxing districts having property within the 2014 Amended Project Area and to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity of the State of Illinois by certified mail on January 17,2014, by publication in the Chicago Sun-Timesor Chicago Tribune on February 11, 2014 and February 18, 2014, by certified mail to taxpayers within the 2014 Amended Project Area on February 11, 2014; and WHEREAS, a meeting of the joint review board established pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(b) of the Act (the "Board") was convened upon the provision of due notice on February 7,2014 at 10:00 a.m., to review the matters properly coming before the Board and to allow it to provide its advisory recommendation regarding the approval of the Second Amended Plan, designation of the 2014 Amended Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the 2014 Amended Project Area, and other matters, if any, properly before it; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 5/11-74.4-4 and 5/11-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission 2 held the Hearing concerning approval of the Second Amended Plan, designation of the 2014 Amended Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the 2014 Amended Project Area pursuant to the Act on March 11, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Commission has forwarded to the City Council a copy of its Resolution 14-CDC-09 attached hereto as Exhibit B, adopted on March 11, 2014, recommending to the City Council approval of the Second Amended Plan, among other related matters; and WHEREAS, since March 11,2014, certain minor revisions have been made to Amendment No. 2, and the so revised Amendment No. 2 has been made available for public inspection and review pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act since March 31, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the Second Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report and, if applicable, the feasibility study, and the housing impact study), testimony from the Public Meeting and the Hearing, if any, the recommendation of the Board, if any, the recommendation of the Commission, and such other matters or studies as the Corporate Authorities have deemed necessary or appropriate to make the findings set forth herein, and are generally informed of the conditions existing in the 2014 Amended Project Area; now therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO: Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Section 2. The 2014 Amended Project Area. The 2014 Amended Project Area is legally described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein. The street location (as near as practicable) for the 2014 Amended Project Area is described in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein. The map of the 2014 Amended Project Area is depicted on Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 3. Findings. The Corporate Authorities hereby make the following findings as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(n) of the Act: The 2014 Amended Project Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be expected to be developed without the adoption of the Second Amended Plan; The Second Amended Plan: conforms to the comprehensive plan for the development of the City as a whole; or either (A) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the Chicago Plan Commission or (B) includes land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission; The Second Amended Plan meets all of the requirements of a redevelopment plan as defined in the Act and, as set forth in the Second Amended Plan, the estimated date of completion of the projects described therein and retirement of all obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs is not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in subsection (b) of Section 11-74.4-8 of the 3 Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year after the year in which the ordinance approving the 2002 Original Project Area was adopted, and, as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-7 of the Act, no such obligation shall have a maturity date greater than 20 years; d. Within the Second Amended Plan, if applicable: as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(5) of the Act, the housing impact study: a) includes data on residential unit type, room type, unit occupancy, and racial and ethnic composition of the residents; and b) identifies, the number and location of inhabited residential units in the 2014 Amended Project Area that are to be or may be removed, if any, the City's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the 2014 Amended Project Area whose residences are to be removed, the availability of replacement housing for such residents and the type, location, and cost of the replacement housing, and the type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided; as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act, there is a statement that households of low-income and very low-income persons living in residential units that are to be removed from the 2014 Amended Project Area shall be provided affordable housing and relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations under that Act, including the eligibility criteria. Section 4. Approval of the Second Amended Plan. The City hereby approves the Second Amended Plan pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act. Section 5. Powers of Eminent Domain. I n compliance with Section 5/11-74.4-4(c) of the Act and with the Second Amended Plan, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to negotiate for the acquisition by the City of parcels contained within the 2014 Amended Project Area. In the event the Corporation Counsel is unable to acquire any of said parcels through negotiation, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings to acquire such parcels. Nothing herein shall be in derogation of any proper authority. Section 6. Invalidity of Any Section. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. Section 7. Supersedes All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage. 4     List of Attachments Exhibit A:      Amendment No. 2 Exhibit B: Commission Resolution Recommending to City Council Approval of the Second Amended Plan, Designation of the 2014 Amended Project Area and Adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing Exhibit C:   s Legal Description of the 2014 Amended Project Area Exhibit D:      Street Location of the 2014 Amended Project Area Exhibit E:      Map of the 2014 Amended Project Area 5 6 EXHIBIT A Amendment No. 2 See Attached. 119   AND HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT Plan Adopted:      February 6, 2002 Amendment No. 1:      January 24, 2003 Amendment No. 2 December 31, 2013 Revised March 28,2014 Prepared for: The City of Chicago By: Camiros, Ltd. 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY      1 MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT      1 INTRODUCTION      2 PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION      4 ELIGIBILITY OF PROJECT AREA FOR DESIGNATION AS A CONSERVATION AREA      6 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES      8 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN      9 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION      9 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN AND MAP      9 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FINANCING      10 HOUSING IMPACT STUDY      15 PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING THE PLAN      23 ] J. CITY OF CHICAGO COMMITMENT TO FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AND      23 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION APPENDIX A (FIGURES 2-7 and TABLE 9)      A-1 APPENDIX B (LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE 119™ AND HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA)      B-1 APPENDIX C (119™ AND HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA      C-l ELIGIBILITY REPORT) APPENDIX D (INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY      D-1 WITHIN THE 119th AMENDMENT AREA) APPENDIX E (FIRST AMENDED PLAN)      E-1 LIST OF FIGURES       FIGURE 1      REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY MAP      5 FIGURE 3-A      EXISTING LAND USE      A-2 FIGURE 4-A      EXISTING ZONING      A-3 FIGURE 6-A      GENERAL LAND USE PLAN      A-4 FIGURE 7-A      LAND ACQUISITION OVERVIEW MAP      A-5 i      11?" and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 8 FIGURES WITHIN APPENDIX C; ELIGIBILITY STUDY: FIGURE A      STUDY AREA      C-2 FIGURE B      EXISTING LAND USE      C-l9 FIGURE C      BUILDING AGE      C-20 FIGURED      DETERIORATION      C-21 FIGURE E      OBSOLESCENCE      C-22 FIGURE F      VACANCY      C-23 FIGURE G      EXCESSIVE LAND COVERAGE      C-24 FIGURE H      TAX BLOCKS      C-25 LIST OF TABLES       TABLE 1 -A      BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY (2008-2012)      7 TABLE 2      ESTIMATED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COSTS      14 TABLE 3-A      NUMBER AND TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS      17 TABLE 4-A      UNITS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS      18 TABLE 5-A      UNITS BY BEDROOM TYPE      18 TABLE 6-A      RACE AND ETHNICITY CHARACTERISTICS      19 TABLE 7-A      SURVEY OF AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS      21 TABLE 8-A      HOUSEHOLD INCOME      23 TABLE 9-A      LAND ACQUISITION BY PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER      A-6 AND ADDRESS TABLE A.      COMPARATIVE INCREASES IN EAV - IMPROVED PROPERTY      C-16 TABLE B.      DISTRIBUTION OF BLIGHTING FACTORS      C-l 7 ii      ll?1' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To induce redevelopment pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq., as amended from time to time (the "Act"), the City Council of the City of Chicago (the "City") adopted three ordinances on February 6, 2002, approving the 119th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Plan and Project (the "Original Plan"), designating the 119th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") as a redevelopment project area under the Act, and adopting tax increment allocation financing for the Project Area. The Original Plan was amended pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City on April 9, 2003 to reflect minor changes to the Original Plan's text (the "First Amendment", and together with the Original Plan, the "First Amended Plan"). The First Amended Plan is attached as Appendix E. The First Amended Plan is being amended again to enlarge the area of the Project Area in order to extend the benefits of tax increment financing to areas adjacent to the Project Area, which have experienced distress and are eligible for tax increment financing, as defined by the Act. This amendment (the "Second Amendment," and together with the First Amended Plan, the "Second Amended Plan") also accommodates minor language changes reflecting updates to the Act since the date of the First Amended Plan. The amendments are outlined below and follow the format of the Original Plan. This Second Amended Plan summarizes the analysis and findings of the consultant's work, which unless otherwise noted, is the responsibility of the consultant. The City is entitled to rely on the findings and conclusions of this Second Amended Plan in amending the First Amended Plan under the Act. The consultant has prepared this Second Amended Plan with the understanding that the City would rely: 1) on the eligibility findings and conclusions of the Original Plan, and 2) on the fact that the Original Plan contains the necessary information to be compliant with the Act. The area being added in this Second Amended Plan includes 2,105 residential units. Therefore, a Housing Impact Study has been completed pursuant to Section 1 l-74-.4-3(n) 95) of the Act s a part of this Second Amended Plan (See Section 9, Housing Impact Study). MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT The 119th and Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area, which was referred to as the "Project Area" in the Original Plan, will herein be interpreted to mean the "Original Project Area." The area to be added in this Second Amended Plan, shall be referred to herein as the "Amendment Area". References to the Original Project Area together with the Amendment Area shall herein be referred to as the "Amended Project Area" or the "Project Area." Additionally, the 119th and Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project adopted on February 6, 2002 shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Original Plan" and Second Amended Plan shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Amended Plan" or the "Plan." The amended provisions to the Original Plan are outlined below, with a Supplement 2 added to include the Eligibility Study for the Added Area. Each of the changes detailed below follow the format of the Original Plan. 1      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013 10      Revised March 28, 2014 SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION The first paragraph is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: This document presents a Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and Project (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq.) (1996 State Bar Edition), as amended (the Act) for the 119th & Halsted neighborhood located in the City of Chicago, Illinois (the "Project Area"). The Project Area is adjacent to the existing West Pullman Industrial Park Conservation Area. The Project Area boundaries are irregular, with the Project Area extending north-south from IIIth Street on the north to the Calumet River on the south; and east-west from Carpenter Street on the west to State Street on the east. The actual configuration of the project boundary meanders considerably within the geographic parameters described above. The Project Area is comprised primarily of a mix of commercial and residential property, with primarily commercial use located along both Halsted Street and 119th Street and primarily residential use elsewhere within the Project Area. The Plan responds to problem conditions within the Project Area and reflects a commitment by the City of Chicago (the "City") to improve and revitalize the Project Area. The last two sentences of the second paragraph shall be deleted and replaced with the following: This Amendment No. 2 has been formulated to amend the Original Plan in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The results of a study documenting the eligibility of the Amendment Area as a blighted area are presented in Appendix C, Eligibility Study, (the "Study"). Subsection:    The 119,h and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read: Original Area Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following: Amendment Area The Amendment Area is approximately 407 acres in size and includes 2,450 contiguous parcels and public rights-of-way. The Amendment Area is characterized by: buildings over the age of 35 years deterioration of buildings, site improvements and right-of-ways dilapidation of buildings inadequate access to public rights-of-way excessive vacancies in terms of vacant lots and vacant buildings excessive land coverage •      other blighting characteristics 2 11 ll?'1 and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 Amendment Area As a result of these conditions, the Amendment Area is in need of redevelopment, rehabilitation and/or revitalization. In recognition of the unrealized potential of the Amendment Area, the City is taking action to facilitate its revitalization. The purpose of the Plan is to create a mechanism to allow for the development of new commercial and public facilities on existing vacant and underutilized land, the redevelopment and/or expansion of existing businesses, the redevelopment of obsolete land uses, and the improvement of the area's physical environment and infrastructure. The redevelopment of the Amendment Area is expected to encourage economic revitalization within the community and the surrounding area. The Amendment Area as a whole has not been subject to growth and development by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the Plan. The eligibility analysis, attached hereto as Appendix C (including Supplement 2, which addresses the Added Area), concluded that property in this area is experiencing deterioration and disinvestment. The analysis of conditions within the Amendment Area indicates that it is appropriate for designation as a "blighted area" in accordance with the Act. The Plan summarizes the analyses and findings of the consultant's work, which unless otherwise noted, is solely the responsibility of Camiros, Ltd. and its subconsultants. Camiros, Ltd. has prepared this 119th and Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project and the related eligibility report with the understanding that the City would rely (i) on the findings and conclusions of the Plan and the related eligibility report in proceeding with the designation of the Amendment Area and the adoption and implementation of the Plan, and (ii) on the fact that Camiros, Ltd. has obtained the necessary information so that the Plan and the related eligibility report will comply with the Act. The Second Amended Plan has been formulated in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 3      U9"1 and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 < 2      Revised March 28, 2014 SECTION 2.   PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION The first paragraph of Section 2 shall be replaced with the following: The land within the amended 119th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area (the "Amended Project Area") is shown in Figure 1, Boundary Map. The Project Area is approximately 590 acres in size, including public rights-of-way. The Original Project Area was approximately 183 acres in size and was adopted as a "blighted area." This Amendment No. 2 is approximately 407 acres in size, including public rights-of-way and is being proposed as a "conservation area." A legal description of the Amended Project Area is included as Appendix B of this document. The Amended Project Area is adjacent to the West Pullman Industrial Conservation Area. The Project Area includes only contiguous parcels. This Amendment No. 2 includes only that area that is anticipated to be substantially benefited by the proposed redevelopment project improvements. Subsection:   Community Background The following new paragraph shall be added after the fourth paragraph: However, recent demographic trends frame the general distress that now exists in the area and the need for public intervention to advance revitalization. According to the U.S. Census, the West Pullman Community Area, the community within which most of the Project Area is located, lost 6,998 residents between 2000 and 2010, representing a loss of 19% of the community area population. Median household income also declined within the West Pullman Community Area, falling from $41,141 in 2000 to $39,601 in 2010. These demographic trends, combined with on-the-ground surveys indicating increasing building deterioration, vacant buildings, and vacant land/lots, clearly indicate that the level of distress within the general area is increasing and that these conditions cannot be addressed without public intervention. Subsection:   Current Land Use and Zoning A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read: Original Area Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following: 4      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 13      Revised March 28, 2014 Redevelopment Protect Arpa Boundary m*p       •        «       MS TIS~ 119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No 2            ~ CaiTlirOS o 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 14      Revised March 28, 2014 Amendment Area The existing land use of the Amendment Area is characterized by: a) a high proportion of residential use, largely single family dwellings; b) semi-public and institutional uses scattered along the major streets of Halsted Street and 119th Street as well as on local streets within the residential areas; c) a small proportion of mixed-use properties, primarily commercial combined with residential, located mostly along the major streets of Halsted Street and 119th Street; d) a major public open space, West Pullman Park, is located in the southwestern portion of the Amendment Area; e) commercial use is focused along the major streets of Halsted Street and 119th Street; and f) vacant lots are scattered throughout the Amendment Area within both residential and commercial areas. Figure 3A, Existing Land Use, illustrates the current pattern of land use within the Amendment Area. Existing zoning for the Amendment Area is largely consistent with existing land use. Business and commercial zoning covers most portions of Halsted Street and 119th Street, although small areas of manufacturing and residential zoning exist to reflect existing uses in these areas. A large area of "parks and open space" zoning is placed, appropriately, over West Pullman Park. The balance of the Amendment Area is in residential zoning classifications. Figure 4A, Existing Zoning, illustrates the current pattern of land use within the Amendment Area. SECTION 3.   ELIGIBILITY OF THE PROJECT AREA FOR DESIGNATION AS A BLIGHTED AREA A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read: Original Area Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following: Amendment Area The Amendment Area on the whole has not been subject to significant growth and development through investment by private enterprise. Based on the conditions present, the area is not likely to be comprehensively or effectively developed without the adoption of the Plan. In May and October of 2013, a series of studies were undertaken to establish whether the proposed Amendment Area is eligible for designation as a blighted area in accordance with the requirements of the Act. This analysis concluded that the Amendment Area so qualifies. The following six factors were found to be present to a major extent: Deterioration (affecting 94% of all tax blocks) Obsolescence (affecting 87% of all tax blocks) Excessive vacancies (affecting 78% of all tax blocks) 6      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 a 5      Revised March 28, 2014 Excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities (affecting 84% of all tax blocks) Stagnant or declining EAV Lack of Community Planning One additional factor is present to a minor extent within the Amendment Area: Dilapidation (affecting 30% of all tax blocks) Subsection: Need for Public Intervention A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read: Original Area Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following: Amendment Area The analysis of conditions within the Amendment Area included an evaluation of construction activity between 2008 and 2012. Table 1 summarizes construction activity within the Redevelopment Amendment Area by year and project type. Table 1A BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY r2008-2012 200820092010201120125 Year TotalsConstruction ValueNew ConstructionS 673,848$ 416,225$116,271$ 84,539$ 149,386$ 1,440,269Repairs/ Rehab$ 373,576$ 442,624$ 473,060$304,824$ 378,986$1,973,070Demolition$20$ 21,542$ 2,033$ 24,652$5$48,252Public/Semi-Public$ 0$0$0$1,057,750$5,000$1,062,750Total$ 1,047,444$ 880,391$591,364$1,471,765$533,377$ 4,524,341# Permits IssuedNew Construction161617131375Repairs/Rehab6966403350258Demolition36911635Public/Semi-Public000033Total8888665772371Source: City of Chicago, Dept. of Buildings 7 16 719"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 During this five-year period, a total of 371 building permits were issued for property within the Amendment Area. In analyzing the building permit activity, it should be recognized that a certain level of activity occurs merely to address basic maintenance needs, which appears to account for a large majority of the construction activity. Only one in five building permits issued was for new construction or building additions, while nearly 70% of all building permits were issued for repairs/rehabilitation. While a total of 75 permits were issued for new construction and building additions, 35 were issued for building demolitions, which were often done to remove abandoned buildings for health and safety reasons. The dollar value for new construction reflects the relative lack of new private sector investment. Approximately 32% of the total dollar value of building permit activity was attributable to new construction and building additions, which 70% of the dollar value was for repairs and rehabilitation. The $4,524,341 in construction spending that has occurred in the Amendment Area over the past five years represents a minimal level of investment. This five-year private sector investment is roughly equal to the development value of approximately 12 moderately priced ($350,000) single-family homes. Given that there are 234 vacant lots within the Amendment Area, which could accommodate new homes, this level of new investment is minimal and inadequate. Given the large amount of vacant land present within the Amendment Area, and the presence of widespread deterioration, a significantly higher level of private investment is required to reverse the area's decline. Clearly, the lack of development is not being resolved through private-sector investment, and a continuation of this minimal level of private investment may exacerbate blight within the Amendment Area. SECTION 4.   REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The addition of the following two new goals to be added under "Redevelopment Objectives ": Encourage the redevelopment of vacant, underutilized or obsolete commercial and residential property along Halsted Street for new mixed use development comprised of affordable multi-family residential dwellings above ground floor commercial, office or service space. Encourage the redevelopment of older obsolete single family residential property for new owner-occupied single family dwellings, to be facilitated in part, by the write-down of land costs. 8      119th and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 17      Revised March 28, 2014 SECTION 5.   REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Subsection:      Property Assembly, Site Preparation and Environmental Remediation: A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read: Original Area Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following: Amendment Area Figure 7A, Land Acquisition Overview Map (Appendix A), identifies the properties proposed for acquisition within the Amendment Area. Table 2A, Land Acquisition by Parcel Identification Number and Address (see Appendix A), provides a list of the properties proposed for acquisition within the Amendment Area. SECTION 6.   REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Section 6 shall remain as written. SECTION 7.  GENERAL LAND USE PLAN AND MAP Section 7 shall remain, except that the fourth paragraph under the land use category heading Commercial/Mixed Use shall be replaced with the following: Mixed-Use Mixed use development is proposed for the Halsted Street corridor and for properties on 119th Street and 115th Street. This land use categories permits commercial, retail, residential, public, and institutional uses. Commercial and retail development is envisioned for most of this area. Allowing residential use and public/institutional use along with commercial use provides needed flexibility in order to maximize redevelopment activity. Continued industrial use is not envisioned and the relocation of a small number of older existing industrial uses is needed to facilitate broader commercial redevelopment of land, particularly along Halsted Street. 9      J19"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013 4 o      Revised March 28, 2014 SECTION 8.   REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FINANCING Subsection:    Eligible Redevelopment Costs A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read: Original Area Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following: Redevelopment project costs include the sum total of all reasonable or necessary costs incurred, estimated to be incurred, or incidental to this Plan pursuant to the Act. Such costs may include, without limitation, the following: Costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and administration of the Plan including but not limited to, staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other services (excluding lobbying expenses), provided that no charges for professional services are based on a percentage of the tax increment collected; The costs of marketing sites within the Project Area to prospective businesses, developers and investors; Property assembly costs, including but not limited to, acquisition of land and other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of buildings, site preparation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground level or below ground environmental contamination, including, but not limited to parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, and the clearing and grading of land; Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction or repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings, fixtures, and leasehold improvements; and the costs of replacing an existing public building if pursuant to the implementation of a redevelopment project the existing public building is to be demolished to use the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private investment; including any direct or indirect costs relating to Green Globes or LEED certified construction elements or construction elements with an equivalent certification; Costs of the construction of public works or improvements, including any direct or indirect costs relating to Green Globes or LEED certified construction elements or construction elements with an equivalent certification subject to the limitations in Section 1 l-74.4-3(q)(4) of the Act; Costs of job training and retraining projects including the cost of welfare to work programs implemented by businesses located within the Project Area; Financing costs including, but not limited to, all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued thereunder including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of 10      119"' and Halsted TJF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 1 q      Revised March 28, 2014 any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and for a period not exceeding 36 months following completion and including reasonable reserves related thereto; h)      To the extent the City by written agreement accepts and approves the same, all or a portion of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from the redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of the Plan. i)      An elementary, secondary, or unit school district's increased costs attributable to assisted housing units will be reimbursed as provided in the Act; j) Relocation costs to the extent that the City determines that relocation costs shall be paid or is required to make payment of relocation costs by federal or state law or by Section 74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act (see Relocation section); k) Payment in lieu of taxes, as defined in the Act; 1) Costs of job training, retraining, advanced vocational education or career education, including but not limited to, courses in occupational, semi-technical or technical fields leading directly to employment, incurred by one or more taxing districts, provided that such costs; (i) are related to the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vocational education or career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in the Project Area; and (ii) when incurred by a taxing district or taxing districts other than the City, are set forth in a written agreement by or among the City and the taxing district or taxing districts, which agreement describes the program to be undertaken including but not limited to, the number of employees to be trained, a description of the training and services to be provided, the number and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program and sources of funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the payment by community college districts of costs pursuant to Sections 3-37, 3-38, 3-40, and 3-40.1 of the Public Community College Act, 110 ILCS 805/3-37, 805/3-38, 805/3-40 and 805/3-40.1, and by school districts of costs pursuant to Sections 10-22.20a and 10-23.3a of the School Code, 105 ILCS 5/10-22.20a and 5/10-23.3a; m) Interest costs incurred by a redeveloper related to the construction, renovation or rehabilitation of a redevelopment project provided that: such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation fund established pursuant to the Act; such payments in any one year may not exceed 30 percent of the annual interest costs incurred by the redeveloper with regard to the redevelopment project during that year; if there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax allocation fund to make the payment pursuant to this provision, then the amounts so due shall accrue and be payable when sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund; the total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may not exceed 30 percent of the total: (i) cost paid or incurred by the redeveloper for such redevelopment project; (ii) redevelopment project costs excluding any property assembly costs and any relocation costs incurred by the City pursuant to the Act; and 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 5. up to 75 percent of the interest cost incurred by a redeveloper for the financing of rehabilitated or new housing for low-income households and very low-income households, as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. n) Instead of the eligible costs provided for in (m) 2, 4 and 5 above, the City may pay up to 50 percent of the cost of construction, renovation and/or rehabilitation of all low- and very low-income housing units (for ownership or rental) as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. If the units are part of a residential redevelopment project that includes units not affordable to low- and very low-income households, only the low- and very low-income units shall be eligible for benefits under the Act; o) The costs of daycare services for children of employees from low-income families working for businesses located within the Project Area and all or a portion of the cost of operation of day care centers established by Project Area businesses to serve employees from low-income families working in businesses located in the Project Area. For the purposes of this paragraph, "low-income families" means families whose annual income does not exceed 80 percent of the City, county or regional median income as determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. p) Unless explicitly provided in the Act, the cost of construction of new privately-owned buildings shall not be an eligible redevelopment project cost; q) If a special service area has been established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act, 35 ILCS 235/0.01 et seg_., then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act may be used within the Project Area for the purposes permitted by the Special Service Area Tax Act as well as the purposes permitted by the Act. Subsection:    Estimated Project Costs A. The line item estimated project costs shown in paragraphs 1-9 shall be amended as follows: (Estimated cost:      $1,550,000) (Estimated cost:      $10,000,000) (Estimated cost:      $4,250,000) (Estimated cost:      $12,500,000) (Estimated cost:      $1,050,000) (Estimated cost:      $1,050,000) (Estimated cost:      $3,550,000) (Estimated cost:      $300,000) (Estimated cost:      $2,500,000) B.   The first sentence of the last paragraph of the subsection titled "Estimated Project Costs " shall be revised as follows: "The estimated gross eligible project cost over the life of the Area is $38 million." 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 C.  Table 2, Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs, shall be replaced with the following: Table 2 ESTIMATED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COSTS Program Action/Improvement      Budget       Professional and Administrative $1,550,000 Costs - Planning, Legal, Surveys, Redevelopment Marketing Costs Property Assembly and Site      $ 11,000,000 Preparation Rehabilitation (may include up to $4,250,000 50% of the cost of construction of low and very low-income housing units) Public Improvements      $12,500,000 (1) Job Training and Retraining $1,050,000 Relocation $1,050,000 Financing and Interest Costs $3,550,000 Day Care $300,000 Taxing District Capital Costs $2,500,000 TOTAL      $38,000,000  (2) (3) This category may also include reimbursing capital costs of taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the Area and school district costs pursuant to the Act. As permitted by the Act, the City may pay, or reimburse all, or a portion of a taxing district's costs resulting from the Redevelopment Project pursuant to a written agreement by the City accepting and approving such costs. The Total Project Costs exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense, capitalized interest and costs associated with optional redemptions. These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total Project Costs. The amount of the Total Project Costs that can be incurred in the Area will be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated from the Area only by a public right-of-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in the Area, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in the Area which are paid from incremental taxes generated from contiguous redevelopment project areas. The Total Project Costs provides an upper limit on expenditures and adjustments may be made in line items without amendment to the Plan. An elementary, secondary, or unit scholl district's increased costs attributable to assisted housing units will be reimbursed as provided in the act. Subsection: Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read: 13      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 22      Revised March 28, 2014 Original Area Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following: Amendment Area The purpose of identifying the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("EAV") of the Project Area is to provide an estimate of the initial EAV, which the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental EAV and incremental property taxes of the Project Area. The 2012 EAV of all taxable parcels in the Amendment Area is $44,339,479. This total EAV amount by PIN is summarized in Appendix D. The EAV is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk, and shall become the Certified Initial EAV from which all incremental property taxes in the Area will be calculated by Cook County. Subsection: Anticipated Equalized Assessed Valuation A new heading shall be inserted below the Subsection heading to contain narrative related to the Original Area. This new heading shall read: Original Area Following the existing text of this Subsection, a new heading shall be inserted and new paragraphs added to describe conditions in the Amendment Area, per the following: Amendment Area Once the redevelopment project has been completed and the property is fully assessed, the EAV of real property within the Amendment Area is estimated to increase to approximately $56.5 million. This estimate has been calculated assuming that the Project Area will be developed in accordance with Figure 6A, General Land Use Plan, of the Plan. The estimated EAV assumes that the assessed value of property within the Amendment Area will increase substantially as a result of new development and public improvements. Calculation of the estimated EAV is based on several assumptions, including: 1) redevelopment of the Amendment Area will occur in a timely manner; 2) the application of the current State Multiplier of 2.8056 to the projected assessed value of property within the Redevelopment Project Area; and 3) an eventual return to a modest rate of property appreciation. 14      1 if and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 20/3 23      Revised March 28, 2014 SECTION 9.  HOUSING IMPACT STUDY The existing material in Section 9, Housing Impact Study, will be retained to document the analysis prepared for the Original Area. A separate analysis is hereby inserted for the Amendment Area, below: HOUSING IMPACT STUDY - AMENDMENT AREA A Housing Impact Study has been conducted for the Amendment Area to determine the potential impact of redevelopment on Amendment Area residents. As set forth in the Act, if the redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project area would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited residential units and the City is unable to certify that no displacement of residents will occur, the municipality must prepare a housing impact study and incorporate the study in the redevelopment project plan. This Housing Impact Study, which is part of the 119 and Halsted Street Second Amended Plan, fulfills this requirement. It is also integral to the formulation of the goals, objectives, and policies of the Plan. The Amendment Area contains a total of 2,105 residential units, of which 1,857 are inhabited. The Plan provides for the development or redevelopment of several portions of the Amendment Area that may contain occupied residential units. As a result, it is possible that by implementation of this Plan, the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units could occur. The focus of this Plan is on the conservation of the existing industrial, commercial and residential mixed-use districts and demolition of occupied residential units is not contemplated. While there are no current plans to displace any residential units over the 23-year life of the TIF, displacement of ten or more inhabited residential units may occur. Therefore, a housing impact study is required. This Housing Impact Study, which is part of the 119th and Halsted Street Second Amended Plan, fulfills this requirement. The results of the housing impact study section described below present certain factual information required by the Act. This Housing Impact Study is organized into two parts. Part I - Housing Survey describes the housing survey conducted within the Amendment Area to determine existing housing characteristics. Part II -Potential Housing Impact describes the potential impact of the Plan. Specific elements of the Housing Impact Study include: Part I - Housing Survey Type of residential unit, either single-family, multi-family or mixed-use. The number and type of rooms within the units, if that information is available. Whether the units are inhabited or uninhabited, as determined not less than 45 days before the date that the ordinance or resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 11-74.4-5 of the Act is passed. Data as to the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units, which shall be deemed to be fully satisfied if based on data from the most recent federal census. 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 Part II - Potential Housing Impact The number and location of those units that will be or may be removed. The municipality's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the proposed redevelopment project area whose residencies are to be removed. The availability of replacement housing for those residents whose residences are to be removed, and the identification of the type, location, and cost of the replacement housing. iv.      The type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided. PART I - HOUSING SURVEY Part I of this study provides the number, type and size of residential units within the Amendment Area, the number of inhabited and uninhabited units, and the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units. Number and Type of Residential Units The number and type of residential units within the Amendment Area were identified during the land use and housing survey conducted as part of the eligibility analysis for the Amendment Area. This survey, completed on September 27, 2013, revealed that the Amendment Area contains 1,900 residential or mixed-use residential buildings containing a total of 2,105 units. The number of residential units by building type is outlined in Table 3-A: Number and Type of Residential Units. Table 3-A: NUMBER AND TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS Building TypeTotal Number of BuildingsTotal Number of UnitsTotal Number of Inhabited UnitsSingle-Family1,7751,7751,603Multi-Family105289225Mixed-Use (Residential Above)204129Total1,9002,1051,857Source: Applied Real Estate Analysis, Ltd., Camiros, Ltd. Number and Type of Rooms in Residential Units The distribution of the 2,105 residential units within the Amendment Area by number of rooms and by number of bedrooms is identified in tables within this section. The methodology to determine this information is described below. Methodology In order to describe the distribution of residential units by number and type of rooms within the Amendment Area, the consultants analyzed the 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate data conducted by the United States Census Bureau by Census Tract for those Census Tracts encompassed by the Amendment Area. Census Tracts, as defined by the U.S. Census, are small, 16      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 2c      Revised March 28, 2014 relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county delineated by local participants as part of the U.S. Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program. In this study, the consultants have relied on 2007-2011 federal census estimate data because it is the best and most current available information regarding the housing units within the Amendment Area. The Census Tract data available for the Amendment Area are based on a sampling of residential units. (As the Census Tract geographies encompass a greater area beyond the Amendment Area, numbers will be higher than the actual count.) Based on this data, a proportional projection was made of the distribution of units by the number of rooms and the number of bedrooms in each unit. The results of this survey are outlined in Table 4-A: Units by Number of Rooms, and in Table —5-A: Units by Number of Bedrooms. Table 4-A: UNITS BY NUMBER OF ROOMS Number of RoomsPercentage (2007-2011 Estimate)Current Estimated Units in the Amendment Area1 Room0.0%02 Rooms0.0%03 Rooms3.1%644 Rooms9.9%2095 Rooms28.4%5986 Rooms23.7%4997+ Rooms34.9%735Total100.0%2,105Source: 2007-2011 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau 1 As defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, for each unit, rooms include living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, enclosed porches suitable for year-round use, and lodger's rooms. Excluded are strip or Pullman kitchens, bathrooms, open porches, balconies, halls or foyers, half-rooms, utility rooms, unfinished attics or basements, or other unfinished space used for storage. A partially divided room is a separate room only if there is a partition from floor to ceiling, but not if the partition consists solely of shelves or cabinets. Table 5-A: UNITS BY NUMBER OF BEDROOMS 2 Number of BedroomsPercentage (2007-2011 Estimate)Current Estimated Units in the Amendment AreaStudio0.0%01 Bedroom4.6%962 Bedrooms27.5%5783 Bedrooms41.9%8824 Bedrooms20.3%4285+ Bedrooms5.8%121Total100.0%2,105Source: 2007-2011 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau 2 As defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, number of bedrooms includes all rooms intended for use as bedrooms even if they are currently used for some other purpose. A housing unit consisting of only one room, such as a one-room efficiency apartment, is classified, by definition, as having no bedroom. 17      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 26      Revised March 28, 2014 Number of Inhabited Units A survey of inhabited dwelling units within the Amendment Area was conducted by Applied Real Estate Analysis, Inc. with assistance from Camiros, Ltd. and completed on September 27, 2013. This survey identified 2,105 residential units, of which 248 were identified as vacant. Therefore, there are approximately 1,857 total inhabited units within the Amendment Area. As required by the Act, this information was ascertained as of September 27, 2013, which is a date not less than 45 days prior to the date that the resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 11 -74.4-5 of the Act is or will be passed (the resolution setting the public hearing and Joint Review Board meeting dates). Race and Ethnicity of Residents The racial and ethnic composition of the residents within the Amendment Area is identified in Table 6-A: Race and Ethnicity Characteristics, within this section. The methodology to determine this information is described below. Methodology As required by the Act, the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units was determined. Population estimates were made based on data from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates conducted by the United States Census Bureau. The Consultants analyzed this data by Census Tracts encompassed by the Amendment Area. The Consultants have relied on 2007-2011 federal census estimate data because it is the best and most current available information regarding the residents within the Amendment Area. The total population for the Amendment Area was estimated by multiplying the number of inhabited households within the Amendment Area (1,857) by the average household size (3.5) within the Amendment Area. Based on the estimated total population, a proportional projection was made of the race and ethnicity characteristics of the residents. According to these projections, there are an estimated 6,500 residents living within the Amendment Area. The race and ethnic composition of these residents is indicated in Table 6-A: Race and Ethnicity Characteristics. Table 6-A: RACE AND ETHNICITY CHARACTERISTICS RacePercentage (2007-2011 Estimate)Estimated ResidentsWhite0.7%45Black or African American97.9%6,362American Indian and Alaska Native0.0%0Asian0.0%0Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander0.0%0Some Other Race0.0%0Two or More Races1.4%93Total100.0%6,500Hispanic OriginPercentage (2007-2011 Estimate)Estimated ResidentsHispanic.03%2Non-Hispanic99.97%6,498Total100.0%6,500Source: 2007-2011 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau 18 27 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 PART II - POTENTIAL HOUSING IMPACT Part II contains, as required by the Act, information on any acquisition, relocation program, replacement housing, and relocation assistance. Number and Location of Units That May Be Removed The primary objectives of the Plan are to reduce deleterious conditions within the Amendment Area and upgrade public and private infrastructure to stimulate private investment in the Amendment Area. Although the Plan does not specifically propose redevelopment of current residential uses, some displacement of residential units may occur in the process of redeveloping obsolete buildings that contain a residential component and may also occur through private market development activity. There is a possibility that over the remaining life of the TIF District, some inhabited residential units may be removed as a result of implementing the Plan. In order to meet the statutory requirement of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed, a methodology was established that would provide a rough, yet reasonable, estimate. This methodology is described below. Methodology The methodology used to fulfill the statutory requirements of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed involves three steps. Step one counts all inhabited residential units previously identified on any underlying acquisition maps. Because there are no underlying redevelopment areas or land acquisition maps, the number of inhabited residential units that may be removed due to previously identified acquisition is zero. Step two counts the number of inhabited residential units contained within buildings that are dilapidated as defined by the Act. From the survey conducted by Applied Real Estate Analysis, Inc. with assistance from Camiros, Ltd., 54 buildings are classified as dilapidated with 59 units within these buildings. Of these 59 dwelling units, 22 are inhabited. Step three counts the number of inhabited residential units that exist where the future land use indicated by the Plan will not include residential uses. After reviewing the Land Use Plan for the Amendment Area, it was determined that residents from two residential units would be displaced as a result of land use change. Of those two residential units, one unit is inhabited. While residential displacement is not contemplated as part of this Amended Plan, it is projected that 23 inhabited residential units could potentially be removed during remaining life of the TIF district as a result of private development actions or other conditions that are presently unknown. Replacement Housing 19 28 In accordance with Section 11-74.4-3 (n)(7) of the Act, the City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that affordable replacement housing for any qualified displaced resident whose residence is removed is located in or near the Amendment Area. To promote the development of affordable housing, the Plan requires developers receiving tax increment financing assistance for market-rate housing to set aside at least 20% of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Housing and Economic Development.    Generally, this means affordable rental units should be affordable to 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 households earning no more than 80% of the area median income (adjusted for family size). If, during the 23-year life of the 119th and Halsted Street TIF Amendment No. 2 Redevelopment Amendment Area, the acquisition plans change, the City shall make every effort to ensure that appropriate replacement housing will be found in either the Amendment Area or the surrounding Community Areas. The location, type and cost of a sample of possible replacement housing units located within the surrounding Community Areas were determined through classified advertisements from the Chicago Sun-Times, Chicago Tribune and from Internet listings on Apartments.com and Zillow.com during November 2013. It is important to note that Chicago has a rental cycle where apartments turn over at a greater rate on May 1 and October 1 of each year. These times generally reflect a wider variety of rental rates, unit sizes and locations than those available at other times throughout the year. The location, type and cost of housing units found to be available are listed in Table 7-A: Survey of Available Housing Units. Table 7-A: SURVEY OF AVAILABLE HOUSING UNITS #Location#of Bedroom sRental Price (I)Type of UnitCommunity Area112204 S. Wentworth2$950+Single familyWest Pullman212419 S. Emerald4$1,250+Single familyWest Pullman312833 S. Parnell4$1,499+Single familyWest Pullman412052 S. Michigan3$1,375+Single familyRoseland512135 S. Normal3$1,075+Single familyWest Pullman612148 S. Union4$1,550+Single familyWest Pullman711844 S.Yale4$1,300+Single familyWest Pullman812433 S. Perry4$1,350Single familyWest Pullman911959 S. Prairie3$1,125Single familyWest Pullman10152 W. 117* Street2$1,100+Single familyWest Pullman1111932 S. Stewart1$550ApartmentWest Pullman1211845 S.Union3$875ApartmentWest Pullman13409 S. 118,h Street2$800ApartmentWest Pullman1411634 S. Normal3$750ApartmentWest Pullman15409 W. 118th Street2$800ApartmentWest Pullman16152 W. 117"'Place2$1,100ApartmentWest PullmanSource: Camiros, Ltd. Relocation Assistance 20 29 Although the removal or displacement of housing units is not a goal of the Plan, it is possible that a small number of units may be removed in the process of implementing the Plan. If the removal or displacement of low-income, very low-income, or moderate-income households is required, such residents will be 119"' and Halsted T/F Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 provided with affordable housing and with relocation assistance in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations thereunder, including the eligibility criteria. Affordable housing may be either existing or newly constructed housing. The City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that affordable replacement housing for the aforementioned households is located in or near the Amendment Area. As used in the above paragraph, "very low-income household," "low-income household," "moderate-income household" and "affordable housing" have the meanings set forth in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act, 310 ILCS 65/3. As of the date of this Plan, these statutory terms have the following meanings: "Very low-income household" means a single-person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is not more than 50 percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as so determined bythe U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.; "Low-income household" means a single-person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 50 percent but less than 80 percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such adjusted income and median income are determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937; "Moderate-income household" means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 80 percent but less than 120 percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such adjusted income and median income for the area are determined from time to time by HUD for purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937; and "Affordable housing" means residential housing that, so long as the same is occupied by low-income households or very low-income households, requires payment of monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, of no more than 30 percent of the maximum allowable income for such households, as applicable. In order to estimate the number of very low-income, low-income, and moderate-income households in the Amendment Area, the consultants used data available from the 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates conducted by the United States Census Bureau. The consultants have relied on this data because it is the best and most current available information regarding the income characteristics of the Amendment Area. It is estimated that 23.8 percent of the households within the Amendment Area may be classified as very low-income; 28.6 percent may be classified as low-income; and 23.1 percent may be classified as moderate-income. The remaining 24.5 percent have incomes above moderate income levels. Applying these percentages to the 1,347 inhabited residential units (equivalent to households) identified during the survey completed by the Consultants, it is estimated that 442 households within the Amendment Area may be classified as very low-income; 531 households may be classified as low-income; 430 households may be classified as moderate-income; and 455 households may be classified as above moderate-income. This information is summarized in Table 8-A: Household Income. 21      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 30      Revised March 28, 2014 Table 8-A: Household Income Household Income CategoryAnnual Income Range (2011 Inflation-Adjusted)Percentage of HouseholdsEstimated Number of HouseholdsVery Low-Income$0 - $27,29923.8%442Low-Income$27,300 - $43,67828.6%531Moderate-Income$43,679-$65,51823.1%429Above Moderate-Income$65,519 or more24.5%455Total100.0%1,857Source: 2007-2011 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau As described above, the estimates of the total number of very low-income, low-income and moderate income households within the Amendment Area collectively represent 75.5 percent of the total inhabited units, and the number of households in the low-income categories collectively represent 52.4 percent of the total inhabited units. Therefore, replacement housing for any displaced households over the course of the 23-year life of the 119th and Halsted Street TIF Amendment No. 2 Redevelopment Project Area should be affordable at these income levels. It should be noted that these income levels are likely to change over the 23-year life of the Project Area as both median income and income levels within the Project Area change. 22      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 3 <      Revised March 28, 2014 SECTION 10. PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING THE PLAN Section 10 shall remain unchanged. SECTION 11. CITY OF CHICAGO COMMITMENT TO FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION The entire Section is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: The City is committed to and will affirmatively implement the following principles with respect to both the Original Area and the Amendment Area: The assurance of equal opportunity in all personnel and employment actions, with respect to the Redevelopment Project, including, but not limited to hiring, training, transfer, promotion, discipline, fringe benefits, salary, employment working conditions, termination, etc., without regard to race, color, sex, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, military discharge status, source of income, or housing status. Redevelopers must meet the City's standards for participation of 24 percent Minority Business Enterprises and 4 percent Woman Business Enterprises and the City Resident Construction Worker Employment Requirement as required in redevelopment agreements. This commitment to affirmative action and nondiscrimination will ensure that all members of the protected groups are sought out to compete for all job openings and promotional opportunities. Redevelopers will meet City standards for any applicable prevailing wage rate as ascertained by the Illinois Department of Labor to all project employees. The City shall have the right in its sole discretion to exempt certain small businesses, residential property owners and developers from the above. 23      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 32      Revised March 28, 2014 APPENDIX A 119TH AND HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA - AMENDMENT NO. 2 FIGURES 2-7 TABLE 9A Appendix A shall be modified with the following replacement or additional figures and tables: FIGURE 2    REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESIGNATIONS (this figure shall remain) FIGURE 3    EXISTING LAND USE (this figure shall remain to address the Original Area) FIGURE 3A EXISTING LAND USE (this figure shall be added to address the Amendment Area) FIGURE 4    EXISTING ZONING (this figure shall remain to address the Original Area) FIGURE 4A EXISTING ZONING (this figure shall be added to address the Amendment Area) FIGURE 5    PUBLIC FACILITIES MAP (this figure shall remain to address the Original Area) FIGURE 6    GENERAL LAND USE PLAN (this figure shall remain to address the Original Area) FIGURE 6A GENERAL LAND USE PLAN (this figure shall be added to address the Amendment Area) FIGURE 7    LAND ACQUISITION OVERVIEW MAP (this figure shall remain to address the Original Area) FIGURE 7A LAND ACQUISITION OVERVIEW MAP (this figure shall be added to address the Amendment Area) TABLE 9A   LAND ACQUISITION BY BLOCK AND PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (this table shall be added to identify the properties that may be acquired within the Amendment Area) A-1      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014 33 i   Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014   A-3      119" and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014 35 Legend I      lOrtghslPrcjrclArea U.jAmondnwrfArea General Land Use BMtuxl-UM 8Z3 Pi*' Open Spice Public' IniStuHorul E3 RetldenDal FIGURE 6A General Land Use plan City of Chicago 119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2 camiros March 28. 2014 ^      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014 36 I.: rrcHii •      ■  •        -.      g      ,             .      MM. .        lMTfl1lt^yU::JjtT-T,.-n       -rv:iriPii|.-!Tiflfi, J~ JLLBG'Jr HIE FIGURE 7A Land Acquisition Overview Map City or Chicago 119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2 camiros March 28. 2014 119"' and Halsted TIF Second A mended Plan December 31, 2013 March 28, 2014 TABLE 9A LAND ACQUISITION BY BLOCK AND PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER #PINADDRESS125214260270000146 W 119TH ST225214270270000124 W 119TH ST325214270320000102 W 119TH ST425214270330000100 W 119TH ST52521428012000058W119THST62521428013000056 W 119TH ST72521428014000054 W 119TH ST82521428015000050 W 119TH ST92522320005000011845 S STATE ST102522320015000016 E 119TH ST112522320016000018 E 119TH ST122522320018000026 E 119TH ST132522320019000028 E 119TH ST142522320022000036 E 119TH ST152527100008000017 E 119TH ST162527100009000021 E 119TH ST172528106009000011915 S NORMAL AVE182528106013000011925 S NORMAL AVE192528106016000011939 S NORMAL AVE202528106022000011959 S NORMAL AVE212528106023000011912 S EGGLESTON AVE222528106031000011934 S EGGLESTON AVE232528106032000011936 S EGGLESTON AVE242528107010000011913 S EGGLESTON AVE252528107018000011935 S EGGLESTON AVE262528107035000011948 S STEWART AVE272528107036000011952 S STEWART AVE282528111014000012037 S LOWE AVE292528112011000012027 S WALLACE ST302528112014000012037 S WALLACE ST312528112015000012041 S WALLACE ST322528112016000012043 S WALLACE ST332528112028000012018 S PARNELL AVE342528113017000012039 SPARNELL AVE352528113036000012038 S NORMAL AVE362528113040000012050 S NORMAL AVE372528113041000012054 S NORMAL AVE382528114006000012017 S NORMAL AVE392528114008000012023 S NORMAL AVE402528114009000012025 S NORMAL AVE412528114018000012055 S NORMAL AVE422528114022000012014 S EGGLESTON AVE432528114023000012014 5 EGGLESTON AVE442528114027000012030 S EGGLESTON AVE452528114030000012042 S EGGLESTON AVE462528114031000012044 S EGGLESTON AVE472528115021000012022 S STEWART AVE482528118015000012100 S LOWE AVE492528119013000012137 S LOWE AVEftPINADDRESS502528119020000012157 S LOWE AVE512528119029000012126 S WALLACE ST522528119030000012128 S WALLACE ST532528119035000012144 S WALLACE ST542528120005000012111 S WALLACE ST552528120035000012152 SPARNELL AVE562528121002000012101 S PARNELL AVE572528121009000012129 SPARNELL AVE582528121022000012118 S NORMAL AVE592528121032000012152 S NORMAL AVE602528121033000012156 S NORMAL AVE612528121036000012104 S NORMAL AVE622528122001000012101 S NORMAL AVE632528122002000012103 S NORMAL AVE642528122005000012115 S NORMAL AVE652528122008000012125 S NORMAL AVE662528122011000012131 S NORMAL AVE672528122031000012154 S EGGLESTON AVE682528122035000012136 S EGGLESTON AVE692528123002000012103 S EGGLESTON AVE702528123009000012131 S EGGLESTON AVE712528123013000012145 S EGGLESTON AVE722528125003000012209 S EMERALD AVE732528125004000012213 S EMERALD AVE742528125007000012221S EMERALD AVE752528125029000012242 S UNION AVE762528125030000012246 S UNION AVE772528125031000012248 S UNION AVE782528125032000012250 S UNION AVE792528126002000012209 S UNION AVE802528126005000012221 S UNION AVE812528126006000012221S UNION AVE822528126007000012225 S UNION AVE832528126008000012227 S UNION AVE842528126009000012229 S UNION AVE852528126010000012231 S UNION AVE862528126011000012233 S UNION AVE872528126013000012241S UNION AVE882528126016000012240 S LOWE AVE892528127025000012218 S WALLACE ST902528127027000012224 S WALLACE ST912528127033000012246 S WALLACE ST922528127041000012225 S JUSTINE ST932528127045000012257 S LOWE AVE942528128005000012215 S WALLACE ST952528128008000012221 S WALLACE ST962528128011000012231 S WALLACE ST972528128015000012241 S WALLACE ST982528128016000012243 S WALLACE ST A-6      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan 38      March 28, 2014 TABLE 9A LAND ACQUISITION BY BLOCK AND PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER #PINADDRESS992528128020000012255 S WALLACE ST1002528128025000012210 SPARNELL AVE10125281280280000548 W 123RD ST1022528128029000012259 S WALLACE ST1032528129022000012212 S NORMAL AVE1042528129034000012252 S NORMAL AVE10S2528130006000012219 S NORMAL AVE1062528130007000012221 S NORMAL AVE1072528131003000012209 S EGGLESTON AVE1082528201032000011948 S PRINCETON AVE1092528202017000011951 S PRINCETON AVE1102528202028000011940 S YALE AVE11125282050020000121 W 119TH ST11225282050030000117 W 119TH ST11325282050430000119 W 119TH ST1142528208024000012044 S HARVARD AVE1152528210011000012037 S PRINCETON AVE1162528210024000012024 S YALE AVE1172528210028000012038 S YALE AVE1182528216001000012103 S STEWART AVE1192528216032000012132 S STEWART AVE1202528217026000012144 S PRINCETON AVE1212528218003000012107 S PRINCETON AVE1222528300007000012325 S HALSTED ST1232528300035000012346 S EMERALD AVE1242528301007000012323 S EMERALD AVE12S2528301010000012331 S EMERALD AVE1262528301011000012333 S EMERALD AVE1272528301012000012335 S EMERALD AVE1282528302059000012324 S LOWE AVE12925283030020000611 W 123RD ST1302528303024000012333 S LOWE AVE1312528303030000012342 S WALLACE ST13225283040060000545 W 123RD ST1332528304013000012325 S WALLACE ST1342528304023000012351 S WALLACE ST1352528304025000012357 S WALLACE ST1362528304027000012318 S PARNELL AVE1372528304033000012334 S PARNELL AVE1382528304034000012336 SPARNELL AVE1392528304037000012348 SPARNELL AVE14025283050030000523 W 123RD ST14125283050040000519W123RDST14225283050050000513 W123RD ST14325283050060000511 W 123RD ST1442528305013000012319 SPARNELL AVE1452528305014000012323 SPARNELL AVE1462528305017000012321 S PARNELL AVE1472528305020000012337 SPARNELL AVEttPINADDRESS1482528305032000012324 S NORMAL AVE1492528305035000012332 S NORMAL AVE1502528305036000012334 S NORMAL AVE1512528308001000012401 S HALSTED ST1522528308002000012403 S HALSTED ST1532528308003000012405 S HALSTED ST1542528308004000012409 S HALSTED ST1552528308005000012411 S HALSTED ST1562528308006000012413 S HALSTED ST1572528309027000012414 S UNION AVE1582528310045000012432 S LOWE AVE15925283120010000559 W 123RD ST16025283120020000551 W 124TH ST1612528312004000012400 SPARNELL AVE1622528312005000012406 SPARNELL AVE1632528312015000012434 SPARNELL AVE1642528312020000012452 SPARNELL AVE1652528313010000012431 SPARNELL AVE1662528313016000012449 SPARNELL AVE1672528313020000012400 S NORMAL AVE1682528314054000012435 S NORMAL AVE1692528314058000012445 S NORMAL AVE1702528314061000012403 S NORMAL AVE1712528315005000012427 S EGGLESTON AVE1722528315006000012427 S EGGLESTON AVE1732528316008000012513 S HALSTED ST1742528316009000012515 S HALSTED ST1752528322027000012604 S EMERALD AVE1762528322059000012624 S EMERALD AVE1772528322063000012635 S HALSTED ST1782528323047000012658 S UNION AVE1792528400008000012329 S PRINCETON AVE1802532207063000012824 S MORGAN ST1812532207064000012826 S MORGAN ST1822532207068000012848 S MORGAN ST1832532207071000012920 S MORGAN ST1842532207072000012866 S MORGAN ST1852532213025000012848 S HALSTED ST1862532213026000012848 S HALSTED ST1872532213027000012848 S HALSTED ST1882532213028000012848 S HALSTED ST1892533101013000012763 S HALSTED ST1902533101053000012819 S HALSTED ST19125331020030000721 W VERMONT ST1922533110015000012905 S HALSTED ST1932533110016000012907 S HALSTED ST1942533110017000012909 S HALSTED ST1952533110018000012911 S HALSTED ST1962533110019000012915 S HALSTED ST A-7      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan 39      March 28, 2014 TABLE 9A LAND ACQUISITION BY BLOCK AND PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER #PINADDRESS1972533110020000012917 S HALSTED ST1982533110021000012919 S HALSTED ST1992533110022000012921 S HALSTED ST2002533110023000012925 S HALSTED ST2012533110024000012927 S HALSTED ST ftPINADDRESS2022533110025000012963 S HALSTED ST2032533117003000012945 S HALSTED ST2042533117004000012947 S HALSTED ST2052533117005000012949 S HALSTED ST A-8      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan 40      March 28, 2014 Corrected Appendix B - April 29, 2014 119th / HALSTED TIF DISTRICT ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 20, 21, 28, 32, 33 (NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE) AND 29 IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. WITH THE CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST. TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE 8 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF STANLEY MATHEWS SUBDIVISION IN THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, SAID LINE BEING ALSO THE CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING SAID LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE LINE 8 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CENTER LINE OF 117th ST.; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 117th ST. TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY LYING EAST AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 12 THROUGH 35, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 1 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th ST.; Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630 THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th ST. TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK 2 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.; THENCE WEST ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF PEORIA ST. WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 29 AND 18 IN BLOCK 4 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF BLOCKS 8 & 11 AND ALL OF BLOCKS 9 & 10, EXCEPT LOTS 19, 22, AND 23 OF BLOCK 10 OF THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 29 AND 18 IN BLOCK 4 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF SANGAMON ST.; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF SANGAMON ST. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 19, 20 Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630 -2- | AND 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF BLOCKS 8 & 11 AND ALL OF BLOCKS 9 & 10, EXCEPT LOTS 19, 22, AND 23 OF BLOCK 10 OF THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 19, 20 AND 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 18 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 18 AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF MORGAN ST.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF MORGAN ST. TO THE NORTH LINE OF 119th ST.; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF 119th ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE PEORIA ST. TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH LINE OF 120th ST.; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 8 OF SAID FIRST ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION; Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020] Ordered By: Camiros Ltd. June 29, 2001 /Rev. April 29, 2014 Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630 THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 8 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 18; THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET ALONG THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE; THENCE 142 FEET, MORE OR LESS, WESTERLY TO THE EAST LINE OF VACATED GREEN ST.; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF VACATED GREEN ST. TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST.; ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 123rd ST.; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 123rd ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.); THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 127th ST. (BURR OAK ST.) TO THE WEST LINE OF PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART LYING NORTH OF THE LITTLE CALUMET RIVER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (EXCEPT THE WEST 25 ACRES THEREOF) OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; -4- Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020] Ordered By: Camiros Ltd. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014 Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630 THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NEW ROSELAND SUBDIVISION NO. 2, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID NEW ROSELAND SUBDIVISION NO. 2, TO THE WEST LINE OF HALSTED ST.; THENCE EAST TO THE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF HALSTED ST. WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND, BEGIN A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 33, NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE AND PART OF FRACTIONAL SECTIONS 28 AND 33, SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOTS IN NEW ROSELAND TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 16 FEET OF LOT 38 IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND AFORESAID; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST 16 FEET OF LOT 38 IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 129™ PL; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF 129™ PL. AFORESAID WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARNELL AVE.; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF 129™ PL. TO THE EAST LINE OF UNION AVE.; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF UNION AVE. TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST.; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST. TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD; Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020] Ordered By: Camiros Ltd. June 29, 2001 /Rev. April 29, 2014 Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630 THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, TO THE CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.); THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST.; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF YALE AVE.; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF YALE AVE. TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN WEST PULLMAN, SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF WEST PULLMAN LYING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST., BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST 13.565 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. AND THE WEST LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 105; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON TO THE WEST LINE OF STATE ST.; -6- Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020] Ordered By: Camiros Ltd. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014 Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630 THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF STATE ST. WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 6 FEET OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 9 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH 20 ACRES OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 EXCEPT THE NORTH 4 ACRES, ALSO THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 EXCEPT THE RAILROAD, ALSO THE WEST FRACTIONAL HALF OF SECTION 27 EXCEPT THE RAILROAD, ALL NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, ALSO THE NORTH 21 ACRES OF THE NORTHEAST FRACTIONAL QUARTER OF SECTION 28 LYING SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 6 FEET OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 26 AFORESAID; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION AFORESAID; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVE.; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST. IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST., AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID; Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630 -7- j THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, TO THE EAST LINE OF STATE ST.; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 19 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART LYING EAST OF THE WEST 49 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 19 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 19; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 30 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 30 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, TO THE EAST LINE OF LAFAYETTE AVE.; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK 6 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK 6 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, TO THE EAST LINE OF JAMES R. MANN'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 7, 8 & 9 IN ALLEN'S SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST 49 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF JAMES R. MANN'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST.; 65)      THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HARVARD AVE.; Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630 -8- THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HARVARD AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 6 IN A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, A SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO CENTER LINE OF STEWART AVE.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF STEWART AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 6 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN HUGH LAUDER'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT 8 IN BLOCK 5 IN SAID A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF EGGLESTON AVE.; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF EGGLESTON AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 10 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 4 IN SAID A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF NORMAL AVE.; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF NORMAL AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 4 IN HANNAH B. GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST -9- Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020] Ordered By: Camiros Ltd. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014 Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630 QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 28 IN BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE EAST LINE OF LOT 28 IN BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN AND THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th PL.; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th PL. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO WEST OF AND ADJOINING THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th ST.; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 170 THROUGH 165, INCLUSIVE, IN SHARPSHOOTER'S PARK SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SHARPSHOOTER'S PARK, SAID PARK BEING THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST.; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST.; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 114th ST.; - 10- Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020] Ordered By: Camiros Ltd. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014 Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630 THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 114th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH GREEN ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 16 THROUGH 30, INCLUSIVE, IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION, A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH GREEN ST. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE SAID LOT 30 IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE SOUTH LINE SAID LOT 30 IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 31 IN SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION; THENCE CONTINUING WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 31 IN SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION, SAID WEST LINE BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF AN 8 FOOT ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH PEORIA ST., TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE 16 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 19 AND 20 IN THE SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST TWO THIRDS OF THE WEST THREE EIGHTS OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG A LINE 16 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 19 AND 20 IN THE SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION, SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE BEING ALSO A LINE 8 FEET SOUTHWEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 20 THROUGH 23, INCLUSIVE IN SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST; Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630 - 11 - i i I THENCE NORTHWEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION, SAID POINT BEING 1,032.98 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, SAID POINT BEING 1,188.76 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20 TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD; THENCE NORTHWEST ALONG SAID THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF 111th ST.; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 111th ST. TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD; THENCE SOUTHEAST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST.; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST. 94)      ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. - 12- Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020] Ordered By: Camiros Ltd. June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014 Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630 APPENDIX C 119IH & HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA ELIGIBILITY STUDY - AMENDMENT NO. 2 Overview On February 6, 2002 the City of Chicago City Council adopted the 119th and Halsted Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project (119th and Halsted TIF) followed by Amendment No. 1, adopted April 9, 2003 to amend language and data in the Redevelopment Plan and Project. At the time of original adoption, the 119' & Halsted TIF included substantially all the area that qualified for inclusion into the district. In the intervening years, conditions in the area south and east of the 119th and Halsted TIF declined. This decline accelerated due to the economic distress, foreclosures and increased vacancy brought about by the recession of 2007-2008. Conditions have not improved in recent years. Private sector investment is minimal and without public intervention, this area south and east of the 119th & Halsted TIF will continue to decline. As a result, the City of Chicago proposes to amend the 119th & Halsted TIF to expand the boundaries to the south and east, allowing the benefits of tax increment financing to be used to advance revitalization. Camiros, Ltd. and Applied Real Estate Analysis (collectively referred to as the "Consultants") have been engaged to determine whether the approximately 407 acres of land located to the south and east of the 119th and Halsted TIF qualifies for designation as a Redevelopment Project Area as either a "conservation area" or as a "blighted area" as set forth in the "Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act" (65 LLCS 5/11-74.1 et seq.), as amended (the "Act"). The purpose of this study is to determine whether a portion of the City of Chicago identified as the Amendment Area qualifies for designation as a tax increment financing district within the definitions set forth under the Act. The Act provides municipalities with tools needed to foster revitalization in order to eliminate or reduce blighted or rapidly deteriorating areas through the implementation of a redevelopment plan. The Act authorizes the use of tax increment revenues derived in a redevelopment project area for the payment or reimbursement of eligible Redevelopment Project Costs. The area proposed for designation as the 119th and Halsted Amendment No. 2 Amendment Area is hereinafter referred to as the "Study Area" and is shown in Figure A: Study Area Boundary. The 119th & Halsted TIF, adopted by the City Council on February 6, 2002, shall be hereafter referred to as the "Original Project Area." The Study Area is located entirely within the West Pullman Community Area. It is approximately 407 acres in size and consists of 2,450 tax parcels located on 86 full and partial tax blocks. The Study Area is comprised of two separate areas, the east area and the south area. The "east area" is located east of the Original Project Area, extending five blocks east of Wentworth Avenue one-half block north and south of 119th Street. The east area's eastern limit terminates at the western property line of properties fronting onto Michigan Avenue. The "south area" is located south of the Original Project Area. The south area's boundaries are irregularly shaped, with C-1      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan 49      December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014   Study Area       City of Chicago      ~      ■      .       • 119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2      g\ Cam,rOS 119"1 and Halsted TIF 50      Second Amended Plan December 31, 20/3 Revised March 28, 2014 boundaries generally defined Halsted Street and Carpenter Street on the west; Yale Street, the Major Taylor Trail and Union Street on the east, the Calumet River, 129th Street, 127th Street and 125th Street on the South, and the Original Project Area boundaries on the north. This report summarizes the analyses and findings of the consultants' work, which is the responsibility of the consultants. The consultants have prepared this report with the understanding that the City would rely: 1) on the findings and conclusions of this report in proceeding with the designation of the Study Area as a redevelopment project area under the Act; and 2) on the fact that the consultants have obtained the necessary information to conclude that the Study Area can be designated as a redevelopment project area in compliance with the Act. 1. INTRODUCTION The Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act permits municipalities to induce redevelopment of eligible "blighted," "conservation" or "industrial park conservation areas" in accordance with an adopted redevelopment plan. The Act stipulates specific procedures, which must be adhered to, in designating a redevelopment project area. One of those procedures is the determination that the area meets the statutory eligibility requirements. At 65 Sec 5/1 l-74.-3(p), the Act defines a "redevelopment project area" as follows: "... an area designated by the municipality, which is not less in the aggregate than 1-1/2 acres and in respect to which the municipality has made a finding that there exist conditions which cause the area to be classified as an industrial park conservation area or a blighted area or a conservation area, or combination of both blighted areas and conservation areas." In adopting this legislation, the Illinois General Assembly found: (at 65 Sec 5/11-74.4-2(a)) ...there exist in many municipalities within the State blighted, conservation and industrial park conservation areas...; and (at 65 Sec 5/1 l-74.4-2(b)) ...the eradication of blighted areas and the treatment and improvement of conservation areas by... redevelopment projects is hereby declared to be essential to the public interest. The legislative findings were made on the basis that the presence of blight, or conditions that lead to blight, is detrimental to the safety, health, welfare and morals of the public. The Act specifies certain requirements, which must be met, before a municipality may proceed with implementing a redevelopment project in order to ensure that the exercise of these powers is proper and in the public interest. C-3 51 Before the tax increment financing technique can be used, the municipality must first determine that the proposed redevelopment area qualifies for designation as a "blighted area," "conservation area," or an "industrial park conservation area." Based on the conditions present, this Eligibility Report finds that the Study Area qualifies for designation as a conservation area. 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 Conservation Areas A "conservation area" is an improved area located within the territorial limits of the municipality in which 50% or more of the structures have an age of 35 years or more. Such areas are not yet blighted but, because of a combination of three or more of the following conditions that are detrimental to the public safety, health, morals or welfare, may become a blighted area: Dilapidation Deterioration Obsolescence Presence of structures below minimum code standards Illegal use of individual structures Excessive vacancies Lack of ventilation, light or sanitary facilities Inadequate utilities Excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities Deleterious land use or layout Lack of community planning Environmental clean-up requirements Declining or stagnant equalized assessed value The Act defines blighted and conservation areas and amendments to the Act also provide guidance as to when the conditions present qualify an area for such designation. Where any of the conditions defined in the Act are found to be present in the Study Area, they must be 1) documented to be present to a meaningful extent so that the municipality may reasonably find that the condition is clearly present within the intent of the Act, and 2) reasonably distributed throughout the vacant or improved part of the Study Area, as applicable, to which each condition pertains. The test of eligibility of the Study Area is based on the conditions of the area as a whole. The Act does not require that eligibility be established for each and every property in the Study Area. C-4      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan 52      December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 2. ELIGIBILITY STUDIES AND ANALYSIS An analysis was undertaken to determine whether any or all of the blighting conditions listed in the Act are present in the Study Area, and if so, to what extent and in which locations. In order to accomplish this evaluation the following tasks were undertaken: Exterior survey of the condition and use of each building; Field survey of property conditions involving parking facilities, public infrastructure, site access, fences and general property maintenance; Analysis of existing land uses and their relationships; Comparison of surveyed buildings to zoning regulations; Analysis of the current platting, building size and layout; Analysis of building floor area and site coverage; Review of previously prepared plans, studies, inspection reports and other data; Analysis of real estate assessment data; Review of available building permit records to determine the level of development activity in the area; and Review of building code violations. The exterior building condition survey and site conditions survey of the Study Area were undertaken in May and October of 2013. The analysis of site conditions was organized by tax block. There are a total of 2450 tax parcels and 1,991 principal buildings on 86 tax blocks within the Study Area. Building Condition Evaluation This section summarizes the process used for assessing building conditions in the Study Area. These standards and criteria were used to evaluate the existence of dilapidation or deterioration of structures. The building condition analysis is based on a thorough exterior inspection of the buildings and sites conducted by Applied Real Estate Analysis, Inc. and Camiros, Ltd. in May and October of 2013. Structural deficiencies in building components and related environmental deficiencies in the Study Area were noted during the survey. A total of 1,991 principle buildings were identified and surveyed. Building Components Evaluated During the field survey, each component of the buildings in the Study Area was examined to determine whether it was in sound condition or had minor, major, or critical defects. Building components examined were of two types: Primary Structural Components These include the basic elements of any building: foundation walls, load-bearing walls and columns, roof, roof structures and facades. C-5 53 /19"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 Secondary Components These are components generally added to the primary structural components and are necessary parts of the building, including exterior and interior stairs, windows and window units, doors and door units, interior walls, chimney, and gutters and downspouts. Each primary and secondary component was evaluated separately as a basis for determining the overall condition of individual buildings. This evaluation considered the relative importance of specific components within a building and the effect that deficiencies in components will have on the remainder of the building. Building Component Classification The four categories used in classifying building components and systems and the criteria used in evaluating structural deficiencies are described below. Sound Building components that contain no defects beyond normal maintenance, are adequately maintained, and require no treatment outside of normal ongoing maintenance. Minor Deficient Building components containing minor defects (loose or missing material or holes and cracks over a limited area), which often may be corrected through the course of normal maintenance. Minor defects have no real effect on either the primary or secondary components and the correction of such defects may be accomplished by the owner or occupants. Examples include tuckpointing masonry joints over a limited area or replacement of less complicated components. Minor defects are not considered in rating a building as structurally substandard. Major Deficient Building components containing major defects over a widespread area, which would be difficult or costly to correct through normal maintenance. Buildings in the major deficient category would require replacement or rebuilding of components by people skilled in the building trades. Dilapidated Building components containing severe defects (bowing, sagging, or settling to any or all exterior components causing the structure to be out-of-plumb, or broken, loose or missing material and deterioration over a widespread area) so extensive that the cost of repair would be excessive. The cost of repairs needed to bring such buildings into sound condition would likely exceed the value of the building and would not represent a prudent use of funds. Final Building Ratings Sound Sound buildings can be kept in a standard condition with normal maintenance. Buildings so classified have no minor defects. 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 Deteriorated Deteriorated buildings contain defects that collectively are not easily correctable and cannot be accomplished in the course of normal maintenance. Buildings classified as deteriorated have more than one minor defect, but no major defects. Dilapidated Structurally substandard buildings contain defects that are so serious and so extensive that the building may need to be removed. Buildings classified as dilapidated or structurally substandard have two or more major defects. Eligibility Determination In order to establish the eligibility of a redevelopment project area under the "conservation area" criteria established in the Act, at least 50% of buildings must be 35 years of age or older and at least three of 13 eligibility conditions must be meaningfully present and reasonably distributed throughout the Study Area. The determination of the eligibility conditions being present to a meaningfully extent varies with each eligibility condition. The presence of some eligibility conditions exerts a stronger impact on the health of a community than others. For example, dilapidation, which is a severely advanced state of building deterioration, exerts a stronger blighting influence than simple deterioration. Consequently, the threshold for dilapidation being present to a major extent is lower than that of deterioration. Less incidence of dilapidation is required to make it present to a major extent relative to deterioration. The determination of presence to a major extent is presented in the individual assessment of each eligibility condition within this Appendix C. Each condition identified in the Act for determining whether an area qualifies as a conservation area is discussed below. A conclusion is presented as to whether or not the condition is present in the Study Area to a degree sufficient to warrant its inclusion as a blighting condition in establishing the eligibility of the Study Area for designation as a redevelopment project area under the Act. These findings describe the conditions that exist and the extent to which each condition is present. /19"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 3. PRESENCE    AND    DISTRIBUTION    OF ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS This Eligibility Study finds that the Study Area qualifies for designation as a conservation area under the criteria contained in the Act. The Study Area qualifies because the required age threshold is satisfied with 97% of buildings being at least 35 years of age and because six of the thirteen conditions cited in the Act are meaningfully present and reasonably distributed within the Study Area. These conditions are as follows: Deterioration Obsolescence Excessive vacancies Excessive land coverage or overcrowding of community facilities Lack of community planning Lagging or declining equalized assessed valuation The presence and distribution of eligibility conditions related to the qualification of the Study Area for designation as an improved conservation area are presented below. Maps of the first six of these eligibility conditions are presented at the end of this Appendix C, along with a map of building age. The distribution of these conditions within the Study Area is presented in Table B: Distribution of Conservation Area Eligibility Conditions of this Appendix C. Figure B: Existing Land Use, provides context for the eligibility study by illustrating the pattern of existing land use within the Amendment Area. Age The Study Area contains a total of 1,991 principal buildings, with 1,931 of these identified as having been built in 1978 or earlier. Thus, the required age threshold is met with 97% of buildings being 35 years of age or older. Building age is shown graphically on Figure C. Conservation Area Eligibility Conditions The presence and distribution of eligibility conditions related to the qualification of the Study Area for designation as a conservation area are discussed below. 1. Dilapidation As defined in the Act, "dilapidation" refers to an advanced state of disrepair or neglect of necessary repairs to the primary structural components of buildings or improvements in such a combination that a documented building condition analysis determines that major repair is required or the defects are so serious and so extensive that rehabilitation is not practical or economically feasible. Such structures typically exhibit major structural fatigue such as leaning or warped walls, severe cracking in walls and foundations, and bowed or sagging roofs. C-8      119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan 56      December 31,2013 Revised March 28, 2014 Dilapidation was found to be present to a minor extent within the Study Area, affecting 26 tax blocks, representing 30% of total tax blocks in the Study Area. A total of 59 principal buildings were classified as dilapidated during the eligibility analysis, representing 3% of all buildings. The relatively small numbers of blighted buildings belies the significance of dilapidation within the Study Area. Dilapidated buildings are safety hazards and facilitate various types of criminal activity. The presence of dilapidated buildings is a very visible signal of neighborhood decline and serves as a disincentive for property maintenance and reinvestment. Even one dilapidated property on a block can have negative consequences on other properties. The blighting influence of dilapidated buildings is so strong that such buildings cannot be allowed to stand, to perpetuate blight within the neighborhood, and are demolished. For this reason, dilapidated buildings are not found in great numbers in a neighborhood. The vast majority of the 234 vacant lots currently within the Study Area were once dilapidated buildings that have been demolished. Dilapidated buildings are part of the progression of physical deterioration, which starts with deferred maintenance, then advances to building deterioration, and finally results in dilapidation, necessitating demolition and producing vacant lots. Thus, despite of the relatively low numbers of dilapidated buildings in the Study Area, this factor was found to be present to a minor degree, and contributes to qualifying the area as a "blighted area." Conclusion: This condition was found in 31% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a minor extent and was not used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act. 2. Deterioration Based on the definition given by the Act, deterioration refers to any physical deficiencies or disrepair in buildings or site improvements requiring treatment or repair. As defined in the Act, "deterioration" refers to, with respect to buildings, defects including but not limited to major defects in the secondary building components such as doors, windows, porches, gutters and downspouts, and fascia. With respect to surface improvements, the condition of roadways, alleys, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking, and surface storage areas are deteriorated, including but not limited to surface cracking, crumbling, potholes, depressions, loose paving material, and weeds protruding through paved surfaces. Deterioration was found to be present to a major extent within the Study Area, affecting 81 tax of 86 blocks, or 94% of tax blocks in the Study Area. A total of 896 parcels were found to evidence deterioration in buildings or property improvements, representing 45% of all buildings. These buildings exhibit deterioration with respect to principal and/or accessory buildings, site improvements and adjacent deteriorated right-of-way conditions, which can take the form of streets without curbs and gutters, deteriorated pavement on public streets, alleys, sidewalks as well as cracked and crumbling curbs and gutters. The vast majority of deterioration found in the Study Area was related to deteriorated building components, including cracks in foundation and brick walls, rotten or sagging wood facades, deteriorated or broken windows and doors, deteriorated roof components and porches, and cracked or missing surface tile or brick. The presence of dilapidation is shown graphically on Figure D. 119"' andHalsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 Conclusion: This condition was found in 94% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a major extent and was used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act. 3. Obsolescence As defined in the Act, "obsolescence" refers to "the condition or process of falling into disuse, or where structures have become ill suited for the original use". Obsolescence can occur in response to a variety of factors. Most often, the standard of improvement for given uses improves, or becomes higher, over the course of time. Uses that are not improved or upgraded over the course of time often become obsolete. Market forces play a large role in the process of obsolescence. When the market for particular uses declines, there is little or no financial incentive to make improvement to properties. In the absence of improvements made over the course of time, properties fall further and further behind the current standard and become obsolete. Obsolete buildings contain characteristics or deficiencies that limit their long-term sound use or reuse. Obsolescence in such buildings is typically difficult and expensive to correct. Obsolete building types have an adverse affect on nearby and surrounding development and detract from the physical, functional and economic vitality of the area. Obsolescence was found to be present to a major extent in the Study Area, affecting 75 tax blocks, or 87% of tax blocks in the Study Area. A total of 697 buildings/properties were found to be obsolete, representing 35% of all buildings. The most significant form of obsolescence is represented in older residential buildings, mostly single-family dwellings. These residential buildings evidence obsolescence by virtue of some or all of the following conditions: a) buildings spaced too closely together: b) outdated in terms of size/layout; c) poor building condition/lack of maintenance and upgrades; and d) building age (built in 1930 or before). In general, the types of residential buildings possessing these characteristics are far below the current standard for residential design and construction. The analysis of obsolescence conducted determined that properties with two or more of these conditions constituted obsolescence. The residential areas where obsolescence was most concentrated are areas where building took place prior to annexation to Chicago and prior to the adoption of any zoning code. Economic obsolescence is also present. These housing units do not compete well in the market for buyers and renters because they are far below the modern housing standard. There is reduced incentive to reinvest in these buildings in terms of maintenance and renovation due to the outdated layouts and generally poor quality of construction. The result is increasing building deterioration, which leads to dilapidation and, eventually, demolition. The presence of obsolescence is shown graphically on Figure E. In addition to older residential buildings, this condition is also evidenced by obsolete commercial buildings/properties, and to a lesser extent, industrial properties. Properties along 119th Street in the east portion of the Study Area, and along Halsted Street in the south portion of the Study Area, are predominantly obsolete. Obsolescence along 119th Street is a function of this street losing its viability as a commercial district. This occurred at least 20 years ago, and buildings originally designed for commercial use are no longer well suited to market conditions. Vacancy within such commercial buildings is widespread. Residential buildings along 119th Street are C-10 58 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 also predominantly obsolete because they meet the criteria outlined above for obsolete residential buildings. In the south area, Halsted Street has also been affected by a declining commercial market and the resulting loss of viability. The commercial viability of Halsted Street, while fairly strong further to the north, declines as one approaches the Calumet River. South of the Calumet River, in the City of Calumet Park, there are no commercial uses on Halsted Street, but rather a forest preserve, a golf course and other non-commercial and non-residential uses. The absence of residential use along the Halsted Street Corridor south of the Calumet River reduces consumer support for commercial uses within the Study Area. The commercial district terminates at the Calumet River and market support for commercial use along Halsted Street is weak. The location of the Cedar park Cemetery, which occupies the west side of Halsted Street from 123rd Street to 127th Street, acts to further weaken market demand by separating area residents from Halsted Street and diluting the synergy of the commercial district. The presence of religious institutions, vacant land and buildings, and auto repair/used car sales is clear evidence that the market for commercial use along the Halsted Street Corridor s weak. Conclusion: This condition was found in 87% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a major extent and was used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act. Presence of Structures Below Minimum Code Standards As defined in the Act, the "presence of structures below minimum code standards" refers to all structures that do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire, and other governmental codes applicable to property, but not including housing and property maintenance codes. As referenced in the definition above, the principal purposes of governmental codes applicable to properties are to require buildings to be constructed in such a way as to sustain safety of loads expected from the type of occupancy; to be safe for occupancy against fire and similar hazards; and/or to establish minimum standards essential for safe and sanitary habitation. Structures below minimum code standards are characterized by defects or deficiencies that threaten health and safety. Evidence of structures below minimum code standards was not found to be present to a major extent. Conclusion: This condition was not found to be present within the Study Area and was not used to establish eligibility as a blighted area under the Act. Illegal Use of Structures There is an illegal use of a structure when structures are used in violation of federal, state or local laws. C-l 1 59 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 Conclusion: This condition was found to be present within the Study Area to a limited degree and was not used to establish eligibility as a blighted area under the Act. Excessive Vacancies As defined in the Act, "excessive vacancies" refers to the presence of buildings that are unoccupied or under-utilized and that represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent, or duration of the vacancies. Excessive vacancies include all or portions of buildings listed as for rent or sale where the space is unoccupied, abandoned properties that show no apparent effort directed toward their occupancy, or buildings that are vacant because they are dilapidated or structurally unsound. Vacant buildings and vacant lots are widespread within the Study Area. There are a total of 234 vacant lots and 175 partially or completely vacant buildings within the Study Area, representing 9.5% of the total tax parcels and 8.8% of the total number of principal buildings. There are a total of 67 tax blocks containing vacant buildings within the Study Area, or 78% of the total number of tax blocks. Vacancy in buildings often occurs because the condition of the building is poor. Once vacant, the condition of the building often deteriorates until it is dilapidated and beyond rehabilitation. Thus, vacant lots are often a consequence of vacant buildings. In addition to vacant residential buildings, vacancy within commercial storefront space is widespread, indicative of a weak retail market in certain areas. This is compounded by the fact that many of the vacant and underutilized buildings within the Study Area are also suffering from deterioration and obsolescence. Evidence of long-term vacancy is prevalent on particular sites, where weeds protrude through pavement and rotting boards cover windows. The presence of dilapidation is shown graphically on Figure F. Conclusion: This condition was found in 78% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a major extent and was used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act. Lack of Ventilation, Light, or Sanitary Facilities As defined in the Act, "lack of ventilation, light, or sanitary facilities" refers to the absence of adequate ventilation for light or air circulation in spaces or rooms without windows, or that require the removal of dust, odor, gas, smoke, or other noxious airborne materials. Inadequate natural light and ventilation means the absence or inadequacy of skylights or windows for interior spaces or rooms and improper window sizes and amounts by room area to window area ratios. Inadequate sanitary facilities refer to the absence or inadequacy of garbage storage and enclosure, bathroom facilities, hot water and kitchens, and structural inadequacies preventing ingress and egress to and from all rooms and units within a building. Conclusion: This condition was not identified as being present within the Study Area and was not used to establish eligibility as a blighted area under the Act. C-12 60 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 8.      Inadequate Utilities As defined in the Act, "inadequate utilities" refers to underground and overhead utilities such as storm sewers and storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and gas, telephone, and electrical services that are shown to be inadequate. Inadequate utilities are those that are (i) of insufficient capacity to serve the uses in the redevelopment project area, (ii) deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete, or in disrepair, or (iii) lacking within the redevelopment project area. All properties within the Study Area are presently served by appropriate utilities. However, given the age of the area it is likely that some of these utilities are antiquated and in need of replacement. However, information needed to fully document the presence of this condition within the Study Area was not available. Conclusion: The degree to which this condition is present within the Study Area was not documented as part of the eligibility analysis. Thus, the extent to which this condition may be present in the Study Area is unknown. Excessive Land Coverage or Overcrowding of Community Facilities As defined in the Act, "excessive land coverage or overcrowding of structures and community facilities" refers to the over-intensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities within a given area. Examples of problem conditions warranting the determination of an area as exhibiting excessive land coverage are (i) the presence of buildings either improperly situated on parcels or located on parcels of inadequate size and shape in relation to present- day standards of development for health and safety and (ii) the presence of multiple buildings on a single parcel. For there to be a finding of excessive land coverage, these parcels must exhibit one or more of the following conditions: a) insufficient provision for light and air within or around buildings; b) increased threat of spread of fire due to the close proximity of buildings; c) lack of adequate or proper access to a public right-of-way; d) lack of reasonably required off-street parking; or e) inadequate provision for loading and service. This condition is present to a major degree within the Study Area. This condition is present on 72 tax blocks, or 84% of the total tax blocks in the Study Area. A total of 762 buildings evidenced excessive land coverage, representing 38% of all buildings. In many cases, the condition is present on many, or most, of the properties on a tax block. The presence of excessive land coverage is shown graphically on Figure G. A variety of conditions were found that met the criteria for this factor, as defined in the Act, as shown on Figure H. The most common condition was residential buildings positioned too closely together and creating an increased threat of spread of fire. The properties identified on Figure 4 as representing an increased risk of fire exhibit the following characteristics: Buildings with less than five feet of separation to an adjacent building. Buildings of frame construction, with wood or vinyl side, and highly combustible. Buildings with windows opening onto the area of inadequate building separation. 119"' and Hoisted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 These characteristics clearly represent an increased risk of fire and do not meet modem standards for fire suppression. Current zoning standards require at least a three foot side yard for each building, and current building codes typically require more separation, depending on construction type, openings and other factors. In addition, residential buildings without adequate separation impact livability and market desirability. It is noteworthy that the areas within the Study Area with the highest concentrations of excessive land coverage area also those with the highest levels of vacant land/lots, vacant buildings and building deterioration. Other characteristics were also found in the Study Area that met the criteria defined in the Act. The characteristic of properties lacking reasonably required parking was found on many of the commercial buildings/properties in the Study Area. Because the pattern of development in the Study Area is of a low-density nature, commercial trade depends on automobile traffic and commercial properties without parking are functionally deficient. Also, a small number of properties exhibited the characteristic in which the close spacing of adjacent buildings impaired the provision of air and light. Conclusion: This condition was found in 84% of the tax blocks, and therefore, was determined to be present to a major extent and was used to qualify the Study Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act. Deleterious Land Use or Layout As defined in the Act, "deleterious land-use or layout" refers to the existence of incompatible land-use relationships, buildings occupied by an inappropriate mix of uses, uses considered to be noxious, offensive, or unsuitable for the surrounding area, uses which are non-conforming with respect to current zoning, platting which does not conform to the current land use and infrastructure pattern, parcels of inadequate size or shape for contemporary development, and single buildings located on multiple parcels which have not been consolidated into a single building site. Deleterious land use or layout was found to be present to a limited extent and does not affect a majority of tax blocks within the Study Area. This condition is evidenced by the presence of single buildings which cover multiple smaller parcels that have not been consolidated, as well as the presence of closely spaced commercial buildings which are of inadequate size in comparison to contemporary development. In addition, the presence of vacant land and buildings and the duration to which these properties have been vacant also have a deleterious effect on adjacent property. Several other factors contribute to deleterious conditions in the Study Area as well. A total of five properties were found to evidence deleterious land use, which took the form of incompatible uses in residential areas Conclusion: This condition was found to be present to a limited extent within the Study Area. Therefore, this condition was not used to qualify the Study Area as a blighted area under the Act. Environmental Clean-Up Requirements As defined in the Act, "environmental clean-up" means that the area has incurred Illinois Environmental  Protection  Agency  or United  States Environmental  Protection Agency C-14 62 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or Federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area. Existing data was not found to substantiate the presence of significant environmental clean-up requirements, although it is very possible that industrial and former industrial uses located along the freight rail tracks contain hazardous material that requires remediation. Conclusion: The degree to which this condition is present within the Study Area was not documented as part of the eligibility analysis. Thus, the extent to which this condition may be present in the Study Area is unknown. 12. Lack of Community Planning As defined in the Act, "lack of community planning" means that the proposed redevelopment project area was developed prior to or without the benefit or guidance of a community plan. This means that the development occurred prior to the adoption by the municipality of a comprehensive or other community plan or that the plan was not followed at the time of the area's development. This condition must be documented by evidence of adverse or incompatible land-use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels of inadequate shape and size to meet contemporary development standards, or other evidence demonstrating an absence of effective community planning. The Study Area is located entirely within in the West Pullman Community Area. Early development of this area began in the 1850's, and occurred well outside the limits of the City of Chicago at that time. Early development of the area took place in a number of distinct communities, including Kensington and the Village of Gano. Over time, the area became closely linked with the Town of Pullman, located directly to the east. In 1889, this area along with the Town of Pullman and other portions of what is now the South Side were annexed into the City of Chicago. Much of the eastern portion of the Study Area was already developed when it was annexed into the City of Chicago in 1889. More than twenty years of additional development occurred before the adoption of the City's first zoning ordinance in 1923. In addition, substantial development occurred before the Burnham Plan of Chicaso in 1909. Therefore, this condition was found to be present to a major extent, affecting the Study Area as a whole. It should be noted that the Study Area has benefited from community planning in recent times. However, many of the conditions that now plague the area are the result of original development, which occurred without the benefit of sound community planning. Therefore, while significant planning investment has been made in the Study Area over recent decades, original development done without the benefit of sound community planning has contributed significantly to the Study Area's current problems. Conclusion: This condition was found to be present to a major extent within the Study Area. Therefore, this condition was used to qualify the Study Area as a blighted area under the Act. C-15 63 119"' and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December il, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014 13. Lagging or Declining Equalized Assessed Value As defined in the Act, this condition is present when the Study Area can be described by one of the following three conditions 1) the total equalized assessed value ("EAV") has declined in three of the last five years; 2) the total EAV is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years; or 3) the total EAV is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years for which information is available. Table A: Comparison of EAV Growth to Comsumer Price Index (CPI) compares the annual change in EAV of the Study Area with the balance of the City. As shown in Table A, the total increase in EAV of property within the Study Area has lagged behind the increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers in three of the last five years (2010, 2011, and 2012). While the Study Area's EAV declined in certain years, and lagged behind that of the City as a whole in certain years, the three years in which the Study Area's change in EAV was less than that of the CPI is the measure of EAV performance that meets the eligibility requirements of the Act. Therefore, this condition is present to a major extent, affecting the Study Area as a whole. Table A COMPARISON OF EAV GROWTH TO CONSUMER PRICE INDEX (CPI) YearTotal EAV of Study AreaCPI Change, January; All Urban ConsumersIs the Study Area growing at a rate less than the CPI? EAVChangeIndex LevelChange* 2012	$122,899,900	-13.1%	230.280	1.6%	Yes
2011	$153,676,943	-12.1%	226.665	2.9%	Yes
2010	$164,402,950	1.0%	230.223	1.6%	Yes
2009	$164,177,595	4.5%	216.687	2.6%	No
2008	$153,240,696	10.0%	211.143	0.04%	No
2007	$144,816,841		211.080

* Change from preceding 12 month period Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

C-16 64

Conclusion: Lagging or declining equalized assessed value is meaningfully present and reasonably distributed affecting the entire Study Area, consistent with the definition contained in the Act. Therefore, this condition was used to qualify the Study Area as a blighted area under the Act.

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Eligibility Analysis Summary

On the basis of the above review of current conditions, the Study Area meets the criteria for qualification as a blighted area. More than 50% of the buildings within the Study Area are 35 years of age or older. A minimum of five of the thirteen eligibility factors are required to qualify as a blighted area under the Act, once this age threshold is met. The Study Area exhibits the presence of six of the thirteen blighted area eligibility factors to a major extent, as defined by the Act. These conditions are meaningfully present and reasonably distributed within the Study Area, as determined in the individual analysis of each eligibility condition.

Table B: Summary of Blighted Area Eligibility Conditions summarizes the presence and distribution of the conditions applicable to eligibility of the Study Area as blighted area. This summary demonstrates the degree to which these conditions are meaningfully present and reasonably distributed within the Study Area.

Table B

DISTRIBUTION OF CONSERVATION AREA ELIGIBILITY FACTORS

Eligibility Factors	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
Present to a Major Extent		V				<						V	V
Present to a Limited Extent	V
Not Present or Not Documented				V				V
Total Affected Tax Blocks	26	81	75	-	-	67	-	-	72	-	-	86	86
% of Blocks Affected	30%	94%	87%	-	-	78%	-	-	84%	-	-	100%	100%

Blighted Area Eligibility Factors Legend

1. Dilapidation      
2. Deterioration      

3 Obsolescence

1. Presence of structures below minimum code standards
2. Illegal use of structures      
3. Excessive vacancies      
4. Lack of ventilation, light or sanitary facilities
5. Inadequate utilities
6. Excessive land coverage or overcrowding of community
7. Deleterious land use or layout
8. Environmental contamination      
9. Lack of community planning      
10. Declining or stagnant EAV

C-17      119"'and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan

65      December 31, 2013

Revised March 28, 2014

Maps of Eligibility Conditions Determined to be Present to a Major Extent

Amendment Area

Maps B - G

/19"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Legend

Parks and Open Space I    I Original Project Area i _: Amendment Area IWBI Transportation Ifoy"! Residential 1^9 Commercial Mixed-Use Public / Institutional Vacant Lot

' I..

1 -—j r-

S 'I ! i;\^:H

FIGURE 8

Existing Land Use

City of Chicago

119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2

camiros

C-19 67

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

FIGURE C

Building Age

camiros

City of Chicago

119th & Halsted TIF Expansion

o

u\ |^:J      r*^-1 r*l hH [-h   i j j;

a     so    soc     r» ioco

C-20

68

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

 

camiros

o

•        W       CC       no IMC

119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2

C-21

69

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31. 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

FIGURE E

Obsolescence      

City of Chicago

119th & Halsted TIF Expansion Amendment NoJ

I,' 119th & Halsted TIF Expansion Boundary

I      | Original Project Area

EH Obsolete Residential Parcels (629) {Hi Obsolete Commercial & Mixed Use Parcels (68)

sO

camiros

⁰     i«     sm tn

C-22

70

HO"" and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Flan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 201V

camiros

Vacancies

City of Chicago

119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2

2*     MO rw

C-23

71

119"' andHalsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

jiaTH.';:._«J X

u

City of Chicago 119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2

.J ■-      JI.—j i      ■

      ' —~|      )—"-' r      

i—jb 1—I—i hp

'^:-      -      - U      

.!lHj[E

camiros

*B      713 !M

C-24

72

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

Legend

1    1 Original Project Area tjjSf) Amendment Area

119th&HalstedTIFBoundary

FIGURE H

Study Area Tax Blonks

City of Chicago

119th & Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2

camiros

0     ITO   MO   110 1,0»

C-25

73

119"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

TABLE B - DISTRIBUTION OF BLIGHTING FACTORS

Table B

DISTRIBUTION OF CONSERVATION ARE ELIGIBILITY FACTORS

Eligibility Factors	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
Present to a Major Extent		V	V			V			V			V	V
Present to a Limited Extent
Not Present or Not Documented							V				V
Total Affected Tax Blocks	26	81	75	-	-	67	-	-	72	-	-	86	86
% of Blocks Affected	31%	94%	87%	-	-	78%	-	-	84%	-	-	100%	100%

Conservation Area Eligibility Factors Legend

1. Dilapidation
2. Obsolescence      
3. Deterioration      
4. Presence of structures below minimum code standards
5. Illegal use of structures      '
6. Excessive vacancies      
7. Lack of ventilation, light or sanitary facilities
8. Inadequate utilities      
9. Excessive land coverage or overcrowding of community
10. Deleterious land use or layout
11. Environmental contamination      
12. Lack of community planning      
13. Declining or stagnant EAV      

C-26      U 9"' and Halsted TIF

Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013 Revised March 28, 2014

74

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Properly Number

2012 EAV

I	25214260270000	$5,521
2	25214260280000	Exempt
3	25214260290000	Exempt
4	25214260300000	Exempt
5	25214260310000	Exempt
6	25214260320000	Exempt
7	25214260370000	$22,678
8	25214260380000	Exempt
9	25214270270000	$4,511
10	25214270280000	$21,073
11	25214270290000	$31,459
12	25214270300000	$23,805
13	25214270310000	$64,091
14	25214270320000	$5,173
15	25214270330000	$4,337
16	25214280120000	$18,977
17	25214280130000	$19,089
18	25214280140000	$19,695
19	25214280I5O000	$13,018
20	25214280310000	$4,166
21	25214280320000	$13,882
22	252I428O33OOO0	$24,953
23	25214280340000	Exempt
24	25214290160000	$21,522
25	25214290170000	$15,477
26	25214290180000	$5,225
27	25214290190000	$23,662
28	25214290200000	$22,664
29	25214290360000	$0
30	25214290370000	$34,043
31	25214290380000	$4,744
32	25214290390000	$19,757
33	25214290400000	$274,458
34	25223200050000	$6,574
35	25223200060000	$20,618
36	25223200070000	$20,242
37	25223200080000	$117,723
38	25223200150000	$4,612
39	25223200160000	$4,382
40	25223200170000	Exempt
41	25223200180000	$6,689
42	25223200190000	$7,889
43	25223200200000	$34,548
44	25223200210000	$6,018
45	25223200220000	$4,612
46	2527IOO002O000	$39,480
47	25271000070000	$23,963

48	25271000080000	$4,601
49	2527I000O90000	$35,979
50	25271000100000	$3,945
51	25271000110000	Exempt
52	25271000120000	Exempt
53	25271000130000	$28,679
54	25271000140000	$33,953
55	25271000150000	$52,139
56	2527IOO0390OO0	$59,995
57	25271000400000	Exempt
58	25281060090000	$10,131
59	25281060100000	$16,828
60	25281060110000	$5,597
61	25281060120000	$18,065
62	25281060130000	$32,775
63	25281060140000	Exempt
64	25281060150000	$28,084
65	25281060160000	$5,869
66	25281060170000	$22,689
67	25281060180000	$5,040
68	25281060190000	$10,425
69	25281060200000	$20,717
70	25281060210000	$17,866
71	25281060220000	Exempt
72	2S28I060230000	$28,323
73	25281060240000	$23,244
74	25281060250000	$3,914
75	25281060260000	Exempt
76	25281060270000	$33,763
77	25281060280000	$21,797
78	25281060290000	$25,806
79	25281060300000	$30,803
80	25281060310000	$3,914
81	2S281O6O32OO00	$3,914
82	25281060330000	$8,422
83	25281060340000	$10,656
84	25281060350000	$20,806
85	25281060360000	$0
86	25281060370000	$27,049
87	25281060380000	$25,551
88	25281060390000	Exempt
89	25281070100000	$24,928
90	25281070110000	$23,536
91	25281070120000	$14,482
92	25281070130000	$23,539
93	25281070140000	$3,880
94	25281070150000	$3,880

95	25281070160000	$26,204
96	25281O7OI70OO0	$3,880
97	25281070180000	$3,880
98	2528IO7O19O000	$29,804
99	25281070200000	$26,569
100	25281070210000	$26,603
101	25281070220000	$18,020
102	25281070250000	$17,793
103	25281070260000	$18,523
104	25281070270000	$16,295
105	25281070280000	$9,895
106	25281070290000	Exempt
107	25281070300000	Exempt
108	25281070310000	$44,281
109	25281070320000	$18,590
110	25281070330000	$2,326
111	25281070340000	$15,324
112	2528107O3S0000	$23,522
113	25281070360000	$26,288
114	25281070370000	Exempt
115	25281070380000	Exempt
116	25281070410000	$25,186
117	25281070420000	$7,828
118	25281110100000	$15,218
119	25281110110000	$14,474
120	25281110120000	$24,120
121	25281110130000	$9,650
122	252S111O1400O0	$9,650
123	2S28I110150OO0	$23,503
124	25281110160000	$17,695
125	25281110270000	$24,667
126	25281110300000	$26,406
127	25281110310000	Exempt
128	25281110320000	$21,420
129	25281110330000	$21,126
130	25281110340000	$12,502
131	25281110350000	$26,263
132	25281110360000	$8,454
133	25281110380000	$34,296
134	25281110390000	$26,984
135	25281110400000	$19,984
136	25281110410000	$21,457
137	25281110420000	$26,395
138	25281110430000	$23,646
139	25281120080000	$18,220
140	25281120090000	$17,577
141	25281120100000	$3,880

142	25281120110000	Exempt
143	25281120120000	$26,507
144	2S281120130000	$28,036
145	25281120140000	$6,515
146	25281120150000	$24,041
147	25281120160000	$27,840
148	25281120170000	$16,326
149	25281120180000	$14,407
150	25281120190000	$22,467
151	25281120200000	$26,165
152	25281120280000	$3,880
153	25281120290000	$83,890
154	25281I2030O000	$20,343
155	25281120310000	$31,285
156	25281120320000	$40,291
157	25281120330000	$13,105
158	25281120340000	$17,344
159	25281120350000	$17,821
160	25281120360000	$1,628
161	25281120370000	$5,641
162	25281120380000	$11,318
163	25281130110000	$6,313
164	25281130120000	Exempt
165	2528113O13OOO0	$11,567
166	25281130140000	$15,481
167	25281130150000	$13,554
168	25281130160000	$18,983
169	25281130170000	$3,880
170	25281130180000	$22,767
171	25281130190000	$14,673
172	25281130200000	Exempt
173	25281130210000	$19,606
174	25281130220000	$11,859
175	25281130230000	$1,551
176	25281130300000	$13,747
177	25281130310000	$24,229
178	25281130320000	$22,232
179	25281130330000	$3,248
180	2528II3O34OOO0	$0
181	2528II3O35OO00	$0
182	25281130360000	$3,880
183	25281I3037OO00	$16,996
184	25281130380000	$16,831
185	25281130390000	$4,332
186	25281130400000	$6,212
187	25281130410000	$6,301
188	25281140010000	Exempt

D-I

75

November 15. 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

2012 EAV

Property Number

189	25281140020000	$17,302
190	25281140030000	$3,880
191	25281140040000	Exempt
192	2S281I40050000	$27,096
193	25281140060000	$3,841
194	25281140070000	$24,417
195	25281140080000	$18,795
196	25281140090000	$5,822
197	25281140100000	$19,339
198	25281140110000	$14,246
199	25281140120000	$21,415
200	25281140130000	$18,393
201	25281140140000	$21,477
202	25281140160000	$17,246
203	25281140170000	$24,316
204	25281140180000	$1,551
205	25281140190000	$119,460
206	25281140200000	$17,643
207	25281140210000	$30,654
208	25281140220000	$3,880
209	25281140230000	$20,630
210	25281140240000	$268
211	25281140250000	$15,551
212	25281140260000	$21,727
213	25281140270000	$7,763
214	25281140280000	$20,815
215	25281140290000	$10,341
216	25281140300000	$5,822
217	25281140310000	$5,822
218	25281140320000	$25,169
219	25281140330000	Exempt
220	25281I4034O0OO	$774
221	25281I40350OO0	$23,107
222	2528I15OO4000O	$35,499
223	25281150050000	$30,407
224	25281I50O60OO0	$40,165
225	25281150070000	$26,858
226	2528115008OO00	$22,756
227	25281150110000	$17,519
228	25281150120000	$24,347
229	25281150130000	$3,880
230	25281150140000	$4,767
231	25281150150000	$36,989
232	25281150160000	$21,266
233	25281150170000	$17,282
234	25281150180000	$19,953
235	25281150190000	$21,334
U	Property Number		2012 EAV
236	25281150200000		$16,831
237	25281150210000		$154
238	25281150220000		$27,927
239	25281150230000		$29,698
240	25281150240000		$34,139
241	25281150250000		$17,479
242	25281150260000		$26,109
243	25281150270000		$32,506
244	25281150280000		$38,757
245	25281150290000		$43,327
246	25281150300000		$41,680
247	25281150310000		$60,121
248	25281150320000		$17,240
249	25281150330000		$23,062
250	25281150340000		$31,745
251	25281150350000		$7,608
252	25281180150000		$8,585
253	25281180160000		$3,880
254	25281180170000		$16,171
255	25281180180000		$30,295
256	25281180190000		$3,880
257	25281180200000		$11,523
258	25281180210000		$15,487
259	25281180220000		$17,549
260	2528II8O230000		$17,445
261	2S281I80240000		$12,221
262	25281180250000		$7,187
263	25281180260000		$18,256
264	25281180270000		$26,763
265	25281180280000		$5,768
266	25281180290000		$16,129
267	25281180300000		$0
268	25281180310000		$17,588
269	25281180320000		$24,280
270	25281180330000		$23,054
271	25281190040000		$16,272
272	25281190050000		$16,115
273	25281190060000		$17,066
274	25281190070000		$5,002
275	25281190080000		$15,535
276	25281190090000		$3,880
277	25281190100000		$19,690
278	25281190110000		$15,509
279	25281190120000		$2,609
280	2528I19OI3000O		$3,880
281	25281190140000		$0
282	25281190150000		$0

2012 EAV

Property Number

283	25281190160000	$20,161
284	25281190170000	$12,005
285	25281190180000	$0
286	25281190190000	$14,216
287	25281190200000	$4,528
288	25281190210000	$26,117
289	25281190220000	$21,457
290	25281190230000	$14,603
291	25281190240000	$12,858
292	25281190250000	$8,529
293	2528II9026OOO0	$0
294	25281190270000	$4,250
295	25281190280000	$22,989
296	25281190290000	$4,851
297	25281190300000	$4,851
298	25281190310000	$17,198
299	25281190320000	$22,759
300	25281190330000	$5,743
301	25281190340000	$20,097
302	25281190350000	$13,026
303	25281190360000	$15,599
304	25281190370000	$3,880
305	2S28I190380000	$12,493
306	25281190390000	$15,540
307	25281190420000	Exempt
308	25281190430000	$25,677
309	25281200010000	$1,551
310	25281200020000	$9,497
311	25281200030000	$4,250
312	25281200040000	$20,433
313	25281200050000	$3,880
314	25281200060000	$4,194
315	25281200070000	$23,466
316	25281200080000	$19,479
317	25281200090000	$0
318	25281200100000	$20,996
319	2528I2OO110OO0	$16,127
320	25281200120000	$6,705
321	25281200130000	$19,628
322	25281200140000	$14,286
323	25281200150000	$5,008
324	25281200160000	$17,327
325	25281200170000	$5,978
326	25281200180000	$16,713
327	25281200190000	$27,565
328	25281200200000	$21,308
329	25281200210000	$19,586

Property Number

330	25281200220000	$11,284
331	25281200230000	$16,533
332	25281200240000	$23,113
333	25281200250000	$2,926
334	25281200260000	$20,475
335	25281200270000	$1,509
336	25281200280000	$13,497
337	25281200290000	$0
338	25281200300000	$29,189
339	25281200310000	$26,176
340	25281200320000	$21,973
341	25281200330000	$15,523
342	25281200340000	$18,671
343	25281200350000	$32,601
344	25281200360000	$21,325
345	25281210010000	$1,551
346	25281210020000	$9,082
347	2528I2IO03OO00	$28,482
348	2528I2IOO4OOO0	$21,095
349	2528I21005OOO0	$4,248
350	25281210060000	$5,240
351	25281210070000	$20,254
352	2528I21O0800OO	$19,364
353	2528I2I0O9OOO0	$2,225
354	25281210100000	$22,756
355	25281210110000	$3,692
356	25281210120000	$22,223
357	25281210130000	$26,650
358	25281210140000	$10,530
359	25281210150000	$24,103
360	25281210160000	$17,333
361	25281210200000	$20,764
362	25281210210000	$26,538
363	2S2812IO22OOO0	$5,822
364	25281210230000	$16,076
365	25281210240000	$24,981
366	25281210250000	$13,944
367	25281210260000	$31,044
368	25281210270000	$31,751
369	25281210280000	$8,997
370	25281210290000	$17,069
371	25281210300000	$14,634
372	25281210310000	$20,773
373	25281210320000	$13,175
374	2528I2IO33OO00	$5,434
375	25281210340000	$23,730
376	25281210360000	$1,939

D-2

76

November I5_; 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

377	25281210370000	SI 1.298
378	25281220010000	$1,551
379	25281220020000	$25,121
380	25281220030000	$20,882
381	25281220040000	$28,746
382	25281220050000	$5,174
383	25281220060000	$18,152
384	25281220070000	$22,964
385	25281220080000	$4,969
386	25281220090000	$19,246
387	25281220100000	$23,696
388	2S28I220110000	$1,703
389	25281220120000	$15,352
390	25281220130000	$19,131
391	25281220140000	$12,238
392	25281220150000	$19,193
393	25281220160000	$3,408
394	25281220170000	$25,612
395	25281220180000	$11,733
396	25281220210000	$14,704
397	25281220220000	$34,338
398	25281220230000	$10,094
399	25281220240000	$12,740
400	2S28I220250000	$27,206
401	25281220280000	$20,977
402	25281220290000	Exempt
403	25281220300000	$24,762
404	25281220310000	$9,716
405	25281220340000	$17,978
406	25281220350000	$5,861
407	2S28I220360000	$2,836
408	25281220370000	$4,018
409	25281230010000	$1,551
410	25281230020000	$6,318
411	25281230030000	$13,015
412	2528I230O4000O	$21,056
413	25281230050000	$23,499
414	25281230060000	$17,052
415	25281230070000	$41,312
416	25281230080000	$38,165
417	25281230090000	$3,880
418	2528123O10OO0O	$18,761
419	2528I23O1IO0OO	$9,014
420	25281230120000	$3,880
421	25281230130000	$5,816
422	25281230140000	$19,114
423	25281230150000	$29,498

424	25281230160000	$20,057
425	25281230170000	$25,882
426	25281230180000	$17,855
427	25281230190000	$931
428	25281230200000	$23,502
429	2S281230210000	$13,836
430	25281230220000	$19,931
431	25281230230000	$8,205
432	25281230290000	$31,818
433	25281230300000	$25,593
434	2S281230310OO0	$28,626
435	25281230330000	$33,920
436	2528I23034O0OO	$27,854
437	2528I23035O00O	$6,343
438	25281250010000	$28,872
439	25281250020000	$17,832
440	25281250030000	$6,212
441	2528I25OO4000O	$5,174
442	25281250050000	$21,746
443	25281250060000	$3,467
444	25281250070000	$5,822
445	25281250090000	$2,662
446	25281250100000	$0
447	25281250110000	$0
448	252812S012OO0O	Exempt
449	25281250150000	$17,807
450	25281250160000	$5,661
451	25281250170000	$17,664
452	25281250180000	Exempt
453	25281250190000	$20,310
454	2528I2S0200000	$4,169
455	25281250210000	Exempt
456	25281250220000	Exempt
457	25281250230000	$23,800
458	2528I25O240O0O	$17,586
459	2528I25025OO0O	$26,398
460	25281250260000	$20,327
461	25281250270000	$20,327
462	25281250280000	$16,803
463	25281250290000	$11,848
464	25281250300000	$16,901
465	252812503IOOOO	$3,880
466	25281250320000	$4,354
467	25281250330000	$16,396
468	252S1250340000	$22,386
469	25281250350000	Exempt
470	25281250360000	Exempt

471	25281250370000	Exempt
472	25281250380000	$33,866
473	25281260010000	$27,383
474	25281260020000	$4,481
475	25281260030000	$26,050
476	2528I26OO40000	Exempt
477	25281260050000	$3,092
478	25281260060000	$3,249
479	25281260070000	$15,815
480	25281260080000	$3,566
481	25281260090000	$20,357
482	25281260100000	$9,177
48]	25281260110000	$3,945
484	25281260120000	$18,988
485	25281260130000	$3,945
486	25281260140000	$14,760
487	2S28I260150000	$20,430
488	25281260160000	$3,602
489	25281260240000	$24,080
490	25281260250000	$14,943
491	25281260260000	$9,177
492	25281260270000	$14,365
493	25281260280000	$12,507
494	25281260290000	$37,286
495	25281260330000	$8,902
496	23281260340000	$8,369
497	25281260350000	$50,854
498	25281260360000	$50,854
499	25281260370000	$4,102
500	25281260380000	$4,102
501	2S28126039O0OO	$4,102
502	25281260400000	$4,102
503	2S28I270010000	$13,635
504	25281270020000	$14,452
505	25281270030000	$1,885
506	2S281270O4OO00	$31,417
507	25281270050000	$15,063
508	25281270060000	$14,137
509	25281270090000	$17,751
510	25281270100000	$11,231
511	25281270110000	$10,450
512	2S28I270I20000	$22,543
513	25281270130000	$24,527
514	25281270140000	$4,214
515	25281270150000	$12,530
516	25281270160000	$9,758
517	25281270170000	$26,909

518	2S28127OI80000	$17,448
519	25281270200000	$37,758
520	25281270210000	$13,301
521	25281270220000	$5,044
522	25281270230000	$13,568
523	25281270240000	$16,486
524	25281270250000	$4,657
525	25281270260000	$14,328
526	25281270270000	$3,880
527	25281270280000	$29,066
528	25281270310000	$25,713
529	25281270320000	$31,383
530	25281270330000	$19,948
531	25281270340000	$3,880
532	25281270350000	$10,021
533	25281270360000	$36,557
534	25281270370000	$3,726
535	23281270380000	$3,633
536	25281270390000	$29,055
537	25281270400000	$14,539
538	25281270410000	$7,373
539	25281270430000	$20,360
540	25281270440000	$18,046
541	25281270430000	$3,642
542	25281280010000	$10,336
543	25281280020000	$18,943
544	25281280030000	$44,191
545	25281280040000	$23,749
546	23281280050000	$15,302
547	25281280060000	$17,799
548	25281280070000	$13,554
549	25281280080000	$3,880
550	25281280090000	$4,183
551	252812801OO000	$22,164
552	25281280110000	$31,628
553	25281280120000	$4,295
554	2S281280I30000	$13,498
555	25281280140000	$3,880
556	25281280150000	$4,509
557	25281280160000	$3,880
558	25281280170000	$10,796
559	25281280180000	$21,008
560	25281280190000	$3,880
561	25281280200000	$26,342
562	25281280220000	$10,715
563	25281280230000	$10,715
564	25281280240000	$16,303

D-3

77

November 15, 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

2012 EAV

Property Number

565	252812802S0OO0	$29,187
566	25281280260000	$5,524
567	25281280280000	$2,550
568	25281280290000	$2,884
569	25281280300000	Exempt
570	25281280310000	Exempt
571	25281280320000	Exempt
572	25281290010000	Exempt
573	25281290040000	$0
574	25281290050000	$17,605
575	25281290090000	$14,886
576	25281290100000	$17,142
577	25281290110000	$13,843
578	25281290120000	$15,608
579	25281290130000	$18,943
580	2S281290140000	$18,949
581	25281290150000	$16,362
582	2S28I290180000	$29,838
583	25281290190000	$33,168
584	25281290200000	$3,785
585	25281290210000	$19,333
586	25281290220000	$4,250
587	25281290230000	$18,262
588	25281290240000	$6,447
589	25281290250000	$16,932
590	2S28129026O000	$21,275
591	25281290270000	$9,701
592	25281290280000	$2,572
593	25281290290000	$16,963
594	25281290300000	$20,259
595	25281290310000	$16,026
596	25281290320000	$17,008
597	25281290330000	$13,119
598	25281290340000	$3,880
599	25281290350000	$38,846
600	2S28I290360000	Exempt
601	25281290380000	$37,612
602	25281290390000	$23,783
603	25281290400000	Exempt
604	25281300010000	$29,964
605	25281300020000	$16,247
606	25281300030000	$18,778
607	25281300040000	$5,247
608	25281300050000	$32,657
609	25281300060000	$4,267
610	25281300070000	$3,880
611	25281300080000	$20,804

2012 EAV

Property Number

612	25281300090000		$14,255
613	25281300100000		$3,880
614	25281300110000		$7,365
615	25281300120000		$6,119
616	2528I30O13O00O		$29,969
617	25281300140000		$11,507
618	25281300150000		$0
619	2S281300I60000		$8,343
620	25281300170000		$21,317
621	25281300180000		$16,606
622	2528I30O19OO0O		$16,542
623	25281300220000		$12,824
624	25281300230000		$14,954
625	25281300240000		$9,168
626	25281300250000		$4,865
627	25281300260000		$20,422
628	25281300270000		$4,932
629	25281300280000		$14,519
630	25281300290000		$4,242
631	25281300300000		$21,294
632	23281300310000		$19,931
633	25281300320000		$9,712
634	25281300330000		$19,592
635	25281300340000		$12,664
636	25281300330000		$31,156
637	2S281300360OO0		$15,363
638	25281300370000		$12,757
639	25281300380000		$27,018
640	25281310010000		$21,923
641	25281310020000		$28,830
642	25281310030000		$2,637
643	25281310040000		$27,181
644	'25281310050000		$15,622
645	25281310060000		$4,203
646	25281310070000		$29,683
647	25281310080000		$11,263
648	25281310090000		$19,319
649	25281310100000		$17,830
650	25281310I7O000		$17,232
651	25281310180000		$28,802
652	2528I31019OOOO		$9,510
653	25281310200000		$9,510
654	2528I3102IOOOO		$22,529
655	2528I3IO22OO0O		$40,951
656	25281310230000		$24,734
657	25281310240000		$18,478
658	25281310250000		$14,718
#		Property Number	2012 EAV
659		25281310260000	$20,464
660		25281310270000	$12,882
661		252813102800OO	$27,571
662		25281310290000	$20,856
663		2528I31O3000OO	$18,691
664		25281310310000	$19,788
665		25281310320000	$19,791
666		25281310330000	$15,476
667		25281310340000	$7,336
668		25282000100000	$23,954
669		25282000110000	$10,492
670		25282000120000	$44,443
671		25282000130000	$36,260
672		25282000140000	$24,712
673		25282000150000	$28,606
674		25282000160000	$23,000
675		25282000170000	$13,994
676		25282000180000	$27,029
677		2S282000I90000	$0
678		25282000240000	$22,571
679		25282000250000	$25,778
680		2S28200026OO00	$21,645
681		25282000270000	$12,643
682		2S282000280000	$20,910
683		25282000290000	$16,536
684		25282000300000	$21,968
685		25282000310000	$187
686		25282000320000	$23,592
687		25282000330000	$12,291
688		25282000330000	$7,551
689		25282000360000	$21,258
690		25282000370000	$4,766
691		25282000380000	$25,419
692		25282010110000	$3,914
693		2S2820I0120000	$13,966
694		25282010130000	$13,739
695		25282010140000	$15,473
696		25282010150000	$10,588
697		25282010170000	$23,295
698		25282OI0I80OO0	$13,357
699		25282010190000	Exempt
700		252820I020OO00	$18,977
701		2S2820I02I0000	$21,825
702		25282010220000	$26,224
703		25282010230000	$16,017
704		25282010240000	$23,418
705		25282010250000	$22,857

2012 EAV

Property Number

706	25282010260000	$14,426
707	25282010270000	$17,125
708	25282010280000	$14,031
709	25282010290000	$17,616
710	25282010300000	$20,579
711	25282010310000	$12,454
712	25282010320000	$3,914
713	25282010330000	$25,553
714	23282010340000	$29,150
715	25282010350000	$12,642
716	25282010360000	$21,822
717	25282020050000	$7,838
718	25282020060000	$26,589
719	25282020070000	$9,187
720	25282020080000	$23,573
721	25282020090000	$18,200
722	25282020100000	$6,665
723	25282020110000	$17,288
724	25282020120000	$13,551
725	25282020130000	$13,074
726	25282020160000	$22,041
727	25282020170000	$976
728	25282020180000	$13,414
729	25282020190000	$9,935
730	25282020200000	$13,298
731	25282020210000	$15,933
732	25282020220000	$0
733	25282020230000	$20,015
734	25282020240000	$16,037
735	25282020250000	$25,029
736	25282020260000	$25,447
737	25282020270000	$26,100
738	25282020280000	$21,536
739	25282020290000	$24,639
740	2S282020300000	$26,690
741	25282020310000	$23,660
742	25282020320000	$43,080
743	25282020330000	$3,619
744	25282040010000	$32,935
745	25282040020000	$4,416
746	25282040030000	$3,945
747	25282040040000	$5,521
748	25282040050000	$13,691
749	25282040060000	$20,310
750	25282040070000	$17,900
751	25282040080000	$4,660
752	25282040090000	$9,472

D-4

78

November 15. 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

2012 EAV

Property Number

753	25282050010000	524,148
754	25282050020000	$7,233
755	25282050030000	$7,233
756	25282050060000	$3,614
757	25282050070000	$5,917
758	25282050430000	$5,496
759	2S2820S0440000	$13,453
760	25282050470000	Exempt
761	25282050480000	$75,224
762	25282060410000	Exempt
763	25282070010000	$23,306
764	25282070020000	$23,306
765	25282070030000	$17,120
766	25282070040000	$17,339
767	25282070050000	$4,770
768	25282070230000	Exempt
769	25282070240000	Exempt
770	25282070250000	Exempt
771	25282070270000	$23,006
772	25282070560000	Exempt
773	25282070570000	$1,422
774	25282080030000	$33,361
775	25282080040000	$26,490
776	25282080050000	$12,938
777	25282080060000	$16,898
778	25282080070000	$845
779	25282080080000	$50,602
780	25282080140000	$31,844
781	25282080150000	$11,882
782	25282080160000	$20,293
783	23282080170000	$23,735
784	25282080180000	$12,892
785	25282O80I90OO0	$17,894
786	25282080200000	$10,086
787	25282080210000	$1,429
788	25282080220000	$18,321
789	2S28208023O0O0	$17,858
790	25282080240000	$3,880
791	25282080250000	$18,615
792	25282080310000	$24,106
793	25282080320000	$21,878
794	25282080330000	$23,735
795	25282080340000	$10,826
796	25282080350000	$24,378
797	25282080360000	$22,389
798	25282080370000	$113,913
799	25282080380000	$25,828
»	Property Number		2012 EAV
800	25282080400000		$25,865
801	25282080410000		$25,129
802	25282090010000		$5,523
803	25282090020000		$16,435
804	25282090030000		$14,188
805	25282090040000		$15,044
806	25282090050000		$19,973
807	25282090060000		$19,622
808	25282090070000		$15,958
809	25282090080000		$387
810	25282090090000		$16,488
811	25282090I00O00		$12,404
812	25282090110000		$406
813	2S282090I20000		$11,621
814	25282090130000		$22,807
815	25282090140000		$21,502
816	25282090150000		$11,468
817	2S282O90I6000O		$10,831
818	25282090170000		$1,551
819	25282090180000		$36,706
820	25282090190000		$29,195
821	25282090200000		$25,820
822	25282090210000		$23,629
823	25282090220000		$9,660
824	25282090230000		$14,401
825	25282090240000		$21,087
826	25282090250000		$14,241
827	25282090260000		$9,718
828	25282090270000		$154
829	25282090280000		Exempt
830	25282090290000		$21,816
831	25282090300000		$17,552
832	252820903IO000		$14,334
833	25282090320000		$20,486
834	25282090330000		$17,111
835	2S282090340000		$4,986
836	25282100010000		$23,831
837	2S282I00020000		$11,840
838	25282100030000		$13,902
839	25282100040000		$23,446
840	25282100050000		$11,054
841	25282100060000		$9,875
842	25282100070000		$20,905
843	25282100080000		$6,803
844	25282100090000		$19,965
845	25282100100000		$22,717
846	25282100110000		$18,273

2012 EAV

Property Number

847	23282IOOI20000	$13,144
848	25282100130000	$20,416
849	25282100140000	$11,907
850	25282100150000	$11,907
851	25282100160000	$3,847
852	25282100170000	$23,704
853	25282100180000	$25,046
854	25282I00190O00	$9,556
855	25282100200000	$33,701
856	25282100210000	$16,141
857	25282100220000	$13,371
858	25282100230000	$5,044
859	25282100240000	$5,044
860	2S282I00250000	$23,744
861	25282100260000	$15,279
862	25282100270000	$14,135
863	25282100280000	$32,228
864	2S282I00290000	$17,830
865	25282100300000	$16,559
866	25282100310000	$11,811
867	25282100320000	$15,521
868	25282100330000	$22,675
869	25282160O100O0	$1,551
870	25282160020000	$10,259
871	2S282160030000	$10,910
872	25282160040000	$19,602
873	2S282I60050OO0	$21,704
874	25282160080000	$11,760
875	25282160090000	$13,701
876	25282160100000	$19,838
877	25282160110000	$28,788
878	25282160120000	$6,382
879	25282160130000	$13,602
880	25282160140000	$23,786
881	25282160150000	$13,700
882	25282160160000	$29,145
883	25282160170000	$1,075
884	25282160180000	$21,241
883	25282160190000	$14,861
886	25282160200000	$28,741
887	25282160210000	$38,383
888	25282I6023OO00	$16,331
889	25282I6O24000O	$9,585
890	25282160250000	$16,909
891	25282160260000	$11,688
892	25282160270000	$19,303
893	25282160280000	$3,880

2012 EAV

Property Number

894	25282160300000	$26,583
895	25282160310000	$10,925
896	25282160320000	$1,939
897	25282160330000	$9,592
898	25282170030000	$23,581
899	25282170040000	$29,153
900	25282170050000	$25,870
901	25282170060000	$33,532
902	2S282I70070000	$3,880
903	2S282I70080000	$3,880
904	25282170090000	$4,343
905	25282170100000	$3,880
906	25282170110000	$32,076
907	25282170120000	$3,880
908	25282170130000	$3,880
909	25282170140000	$14,881
910	25282170150000	$13,949
911	25282170160000	$7,259
912	25282170170000	$1,469
913	25282170180000	$25,767
914	25282170190000	$13,472
915	25282170200000	$16,525
916	252821702I0OO0	$0
917	25282170220000	$18,290
918	25282170230000	$904
919	25282170240000	$23,087
920	25282170250000	$15,305
921	25282170260000	$6,736
922	25282170270000	Exempt
923	25282170280000	$20,958
924	25282170290000	$24,686
925	25282170300000	$1,551
926	25282170310000	$24,134
927	25282180010000	$8,829
928	25282180020000	$9,907
929	25282180030000	$3,880
930	25282180040000	$22,554
931	25282I80OS0OOO	$15,122
932	25282180060000	$0
933	25282180070000	$16,800
934	25282180080000	$17,858
935	25282180090000	$7,156
936	25282180100000	$15,139
937	25282180110000	$12,342
938	25282180120000	$13,066
939	25282180I300O0	$17,109
940	25282180140000	$16,345

D-5

79

November 15. 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

941	25282180150000	S16.738
942	2S282I80I60000	$9,748
943	25282180170000	$9,748
944	25282180180000	$23,236
945	25282180190000	$17,695
946	25282180200000	$18,977
947	25282180210000	$20,955
948	25282180220000	$24,400
949	25282180230000	$12,249
950	25282180240000	$46,514
951	25282180250000	$12,860
952	25282180260000	$25,907
953	25282180270000	$20,391
954	25282180280000	$21,617
955	25282180290000	$25,604
956	25282180300000	$15,573
957	25282180310000	$26,157
958	25282180320000	$3,796
959	25282180330000	$26,572
960	2S282240010000	$3,880
961	25282240020000	$3,880
962	252S22400300O0	$37,314
963	25282240040000	$30,839
964	25282240050000	$30,867
965	25282240060000	$30,733
966	25282240070000	$11,963
967	25282240080000	$21,628
968	25282240090000	$20,486
969	25282240100000	$13,882
970	23282240110000	$48,843
971	25282240120000	$16,073
972	23282240130000	$31,989
973	25282240140000	$16,887
974	25282240150000	$16,887
975	25282240160000	$27,423
976	25282240170000	$10,196
977	25282240180000	$27,784
978	2S282240I90000	$27,644
979	25282240200000	$20,419
980	23282240210000	$16,185
981	25282240220000	$5,822
982	25282240230000	$16,399
983	25282240240000	$6,317
984	25282240250000	$2,587
985	25282240260000	$18,856
986	25282240270000	$20,391
987	25282240300000	$25,649

988	25282250010000	$0
989	25282250020000	$0
990	25282250030000	$29,030
991	25282250040000	$20,756
992	25282250050000	$21,485
993	2S282250O60000	$25,629
994	25282250070000	$19,566
995	25282250100000	$12,355
996	25282250110000	$20,153
997	25282250120000	$28,925
998	25282250130000	$21,070
999	2S2822S0140000	$13,955
1000	25282250150000	$29,442
100]	25282250160000	$15,402
1002	25282250170000	$21,485
1003	25282250180000	$21,805
1004	25282250190000	$26,875
1005	25282250200000	$850
1006	25282250210000	$22,091
1007	25282250220000	$27,035
1008	25282250230000	$21,942
1009	25282250240000	$19,131
1010	25282250250000	$27,127
1011	25282250260000	$22,302
1012	25282250270000	$19,263
1013	25282250280000	$18,478
1014	25282250290000	$27,355
1015	25282250300000	$20,366
1016	25282260010000	$22,616
1017	25282260020000	$15,142
1018	25282260030000	$8,054
1019	25282260040000	$22,627
1020	25282260030000	$27,169
1021	25282260060000	$15,450
1022	25282260070000	$11,879
1023	25282260080000	$24,729
1024	25282260090000	$12,454
1025	25282260100000	$17,566
1026	25282260)10000	$5,822
1027	25282260120000	$21,090
1028	25282260130000	$18,082
1029	25282260140000	$18,652
1030	25282260150000	$4,023
1031	25282260160000	$19,939
1032	25282260170000	$11,598
1033	25282260180000	$3,240
1034	25282260190000	$19,089

1035	25282260200000	$7,544
1036	25282260210000	$18,632
1037	25282260220000	$8,977
1038	25282260230000	$15,723
1039	25282260240000	$18,716
1040	25282260250000	$21,157
1041	25282260260000	$18,191
1042	25282260270000	$31,827
1043	25282260280000	$17,557
1044	25282260290000	$17,347
1045	25282260300000	$3,206
1046	25282260310000	$26,782
1047	25282260360000	$12,549
1048	25282260370000	$18,043
1049	25282260380000	$12,176
1050	25283000010000	$51,104
1051	25283000020000	$50,694
1052	25283000030000	$63,300
1053	25283000040000	$239,228
1054	25283000050000	$6,313
1055	25283000060000	$6,313
1056	25283000070000	$6,694
1057	25283000080000	$6,133
1058	25283000090000	$16,101
1059	25283000100000	$37,508
1060	25283000110000	$37,508
1061	25283000120000	$16,674
1062	23283000190000	$16,545
1063	25283000200000	$16,545
1064	25283000210000	$35,367
1065	25283000220000	$24,013
1066	25283000230000	$14,777
1067	25283000240000	$17,591
1068	25283000280000	$33,241
1069	2S2830OO29OOOO	$23,107
1070	25283000320000	$7,707
1071	25283000330000	$11,371
1072	25283000340000	$15,655
1073	25283000350000	$5,434
1074	25283000360000	$7,452
1075	25283000370000	$28,513
1076	25283000380000	$15,074
1077	25283000390000	$20,200
1078	25283000400000	$9,932
1079	25283000410000	$20,832
1080	25283000420000	$12,490
1081	25283000430000	$364,456

1082	25283010010000	$36,905
1083	25283010020000	$7,115
1084	25283010030000	$7,115
1085	25283010040000	$0
1086	23283010050000	$24,094
1087	25283010060000	$7,996
1088	25283010070000	$5,822
1089	25283010080000	$8,178
1090	25283010090000	$4,304
1091	25283010100000	$3,880
1092	25283010110000	$3,880
1093	25283010120000	$3,880
1094	25283010130000	$14,929
1095	25283010140000	$16,831
1096	25283010150000	$15,369
1097	25283010160000	$21,704
1098	232830I0I7OOOO	$20,789
1099	25283010180000	$13,522
1100	25283010190000	$13,522
1101	25283010200000	$28,512
1102	23283010210000	$28,377
1103	2J283010220000	$21,732
1104	2S283O1O23OOO0	$16,037
1105	25283010240000	$26,656
1106	25283010270000	$22,902
1107	25283010280000	$3,880
1108	25283010290000	$4,364
1109	25283010300000	$8,728
1110	25283010400000	$15,232
mi	25283010410000	$8,338
1112	25283010420000	$970
1113	25283010430000	$27,896
1114	25283010440000	$3,493
1115	25283010450000	$30,651
1116	25283010460000	$14,976
1117	25283010470000	$21,971
1118	252830200IOOOO	$16,097
1119	25283020020000	$15,962
1120	25283020030000	$17,465
1121	2S283020O4O0OO	$15,349
1122	25283020050000	$4,800
1123	25283020060000	$11,646
1124	25283020070000	$3,880
1125	25283020080000	$14,266
1126	25283020090000	$14,266
1127	25283020100000	$22,840
1128	25283020IIOOOO	$3,880

D-6

80

November 15. 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

2012 EAV

Property Number

1129	25283020120000	$0
1130	25283020130000	$3,880
1131	25283020290000	$11,913
1132	25283020300000	$32,158
1133	25283020310000	$4,553
1134	25283020320000	$3,880
1133	25283020470000	$497
1136	25283020550000	$10,532
1137	25283020570000	$23,315
1138	25283020580000	$21,777
1139	25283020590000	$5,822
1140	25283020600000	$25,326
1141	25283020610000	$24,701
1142	25283020620000	$21,665
1143	25283020630000	$24,330
1144	2S283020640000	$11,509
1145	25283020690000	$21,104
1146	25283020700000	$26,990
1147	25283020710000	$26,479
1148	25283020720000	$15,433
1149	25283020730000	$14,398
1130	25283020740000	$9,847
1151	25283020750000	$24,686
1152	25283020760000	$8,562
1153	25283020770000	$41,871
1154	25283020780000	$32,960
1155	25283020790000	$31,641
1156	25283030010000	$5,179
1157	25283030020000	$6,195
1158	25283030030000	$12,970
1159	25283030040000	$18,884
1160	25283030050000	$38,782
1161	25283030070000	$4,576
1162	25283030080000	$4,323
1163	25283030120000	$3,187
1164	25283030130000	$19,552
1163	25283030140000	$8,201
1166	25283030210000	$1,133
1167	25283030220000	$16,253
1168	25283030230000	$15,394
1169	2S283O3O24OO00	$116,564
1170	25283030250000	$51,699
1171	25283030260000	$42,154
1172	25283030270000	$50,638
1173	25283030280000	$41,798
1174	25283030290000	$14,429
1175	25283030300000	$7,931

2012 EAV

Property Number

1176	25283030320000			Exempt
1177	25283030330000			Exempt
1178	25283040010000			$23,618
1179	25283040020000			$33
1180	25283040030000			$19,008
1181	25283040040000			$23,026
1182	25283040050000			$3,945
1183	25283040060000			$27,130
1184	25283040070000			$25,617
1185	25283040080000			$65,685
1186	25283040090000			$14,956
1187	25283040100000			$21,174
1188	25283040110000			$9,331
1189	25283040120000			$26,507
1190	25283040130000			$3,880
1191	2S283040I40000			$3,880
1192	25283040150000			Exempt
1193	25283040160000			$42,297
1194	25283040170000			$12,019
1195	25283040180000			$7,805
1196	25283040190000			$9,763
1197	25283040200000			$7,993
1198	25283040210000			$3,880
1199	25283040220000			$14,090
1200	23283040230000			$4,290
1201	25283040240000			$20,442
1202	25283040250000			$4,671
1203	25283040260000			$0
1204	25283040270000			$5,822
1205	25283040280000			$18,744
1206	25283040290000			$3,880
1207	2S283O4O3O000O			Exempt
1208	252830403IOOOO			$13,742
1209	25283040320000			$12,499
1210	25283040330000			$3,880
1211	25283040340000			$3,880
1212	25283040350000			$14,396
1213	25283040360000			$19,855
1214	25283040370000			$4,851
1213	25283040380000			$17,628
1216	25283040390000			$0
1217	25283040400000			$3,880
1218	25283040410000			$22,599
1219	25283050010000			$14,260
1220	25283050020000			$13,085
1221	25283050030000			$3,945
1222	25283050040000			$3,945
#		Property Number	2012 EAV
1223		25283050050000	$3,939
1224		25283050060000	$14,334
1225		25283050070000	$0
1226		25283050080000	$17,605
1227		25283050090000	$44,797
1228		25283050100000	$45,771
1229		23283050110000	$20,158
1230		25283050120000	$14,292
1231		25283050130000	$3,880
1232		25283050140000	$3,880
1233		25283050150000	$5,115
1234		25283050160000	$28,474
1235		25283050170000	$3,880
1236		25283050180000	$18,026
1237		25283050190000	Exempt
1238		25283050200000	$3,880
1239		2S283050210000	$32,054
1240		25283050220000	$32,054
1241		25283050230000	$8,509
1242		2S283050240000	$11,683
1243		2S283O5O280OOO	$12,451
1244		25283050290000	$17,198
1245		25283050300000	$3,880
1246		25283050310000	$10,768
1247		25283050320000	$3,880
1248		2S2830S033O000	$18,287
1249		2S283O5O340OOO	$13,509
1250		25283050350000	$3,880
1251		25283050360000	$3,880
1252		25283050370000	$17,193
1253		23283050380000	$18,099
1254		25283050390000	$22,759
1255		25283050400000	$16,435
1256		25283050410000	$14,724
1257		25283050420000	$3,880
1258		25283030430000	$12,387
1259		2S2830SO440000	$24,440
1260		25283050450000	$13,595
1261		25283050460000	$4,344
1262		25283060070000	Exempt
1263		25283060080000	Exempt
1264		25283060090000	Exempt
1265		25283060100000	Exempt
1266		25283O60II0000	Exempt
1267		25283060120000	Exempt
1268		25283060130000	Exempt
1269		25283060140000	Exempt

2012 EAV

Property Number

1270	25283060150000	Exempt
1271	25283060160000	Exempt
1272	25283060I70OOO	Exempt
1273	25283060180000	Exempt
1274	25283060190000	Exempt
1275	25283060200000	Exempt
1276	23283060210000	Exempt
1277	2S28306022O0OO	Exempt
1278	25283060230000	Exempt
1279	25283060240000	Exempt
1280	25283060250000	Exempt
1281	25283070010000	Exempt
1282	25283080010000	$61,061
1283	25283080020000	$5,886
1284	25283080030000	$6,380
1285	2S283080O4000O	$6,212
1286	25283080050000	$6,380
1287	2S283080O600OO	$3,440
1288	25283080130000	Exempt
1289	25283080140000	Exempt
1290	25283080150000	Exempt
1291	25283080160000	Exempt
1292	25283080170000	Exempt
1293	25283080180000	Exempt
1294	25283080190000	Exempt
1295	2S283080200O0O	Exempt
1296	2S2830802IOOO0	Exempt
1297	25283080220000	Exempt
1298	25283080230000	Exempt
1299	25283080240000	Exempt
1300	23283080250000	$5,364
1301	25283080260000	$9,814
1302	25283080270000	$22,004
1303	2S28308028O000	$20,192
1304	25283080290000	$6,337
1305	25283080300000	$14,597
1306	25283080310000	$19,998
1307	25283080320000	$21,536
1308	25283080330000	$10,524
1309	23283080340000	$18,071
1310	23283080350000	$21,735
1311	25283080420000	$19,143
1312	25283080430000	$16,531
1313	25283080440000	$14,699
1314	25283080450000	$3,792
1315	25283080460000	$14,855
1316	25283080470000	$28,379

D-7

81

November 15, 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

2012 EAV

Property Number

I317	25283080480000		$21,250
1318	25283080490000		Exempt
1319	25283080500000		Exempt
1320	25283090040000		$13,064
1321	25283090070000		$27,357
1322	23283090080000		$19,460
1323	25283090090000		$9,581
1324	25283090100000		$7,679
1325	25283090110000		$2,751
1326	25283090120000		$23,068
1327	25283090130000		$18,396
1328	25283090140000		$15,282
1329	25283090150000		$19,757
1330	25283090230000		$10,305
1331	25283090240000		$16,721
1332	25283090250000		$14,376
1333	25283090260000		$19,465
1334	25283090270000		$3,880
1335	25283090320000		$3,868
1336	25283090330000		$17,644
1337	25283090340000		$20,624
1338	25283090350000		$3,880
1339	25283090390000		$14,830
1340	25283090400000		$14,830
1341	25283090410000		$18,228
1342	25283090420000		$7,590
1343	25283090430000		$7,590
1344	25283090440000		$21,637
1345	25283090450000		$20,756
1346	25283090460000		$20,843
1347	25283090470000		$16,983
1348	25283090480000		$19,861
1349	25283090490000		$6,533
1350	25283090500000		$28,934
1351	25283090510000		$11,472
1352	25283090520000		$15,139
1353	25283090530000		$27,307
1354	25283090540000		$23,171
1355	25283090550000		$21,042
1356	25283090560000		$6,884
1357	25283090570000		$21,915
1358	25283IOOO1OO0O		$17,501
1359	25283100070000		$18,775
1360	25283100080000		$11,551
1361	25283100090000		$15,591
1362	25283100100000		$23,719
1363	25283100110000		$14,145
#		Property Number		2012 EAV
1364		25283100120000		$20,015
1365		25283100220000		$10,845
1366		25283100230000		$10,696
1367		25283100270000		$8,434
1368		23283100280000		$5,145
1369		25283100410000		$14,530
1370		25283100450000		$21,959
1371		25283100460000		$27,021
1372		25283100510000		$1,694
1373		25283100520000		$13,007
1374		25283100530000		$22,897
1375		25283100540000		$10,487
1376		2S283100630000		$21,586
1377		2S2831006400OO		$21,710
1378		25283100650000		$16,973
1379		25283100660000		$13,478
1380		25283100670000		$18,464
1381		25283100680000		$5,161
1382		25283100690000		$15,983
1383		25283100700000		$22,897
1384		25283100710000		$24,476
1385		2S283I00720000		$7,639
1386		25283100730000		$19,008
1387		25283IO074000O		$19,939
1388		25283100750000		$19,420
1389		25283100760000		$14,746
1390		25283100770000		$2,426
1391		25283100780000		$19,109
1392		25283110250000		$2,909
1393		2S2831I0260000		$1,894
1394		25283110270000		$2,146
1395		25283I1028OO00		$2,430
1396		25283110290000		$2,682
1397		25283110300000		$2,935
1398		25283110310000		$3,218
1399		2S283110320O0O		$3,471
1400		25283110360000		$15,010
1401		25283110370000		$18,775
1402		25283110380000		$22,742
1403		25283110390000		$8,576
1404		25283110400000		$14,286
1405		25283110410000		$13,775
1406		25283110420000		$17,212
1407		25283110430000		$10,414
1408		25283110440000		$11,907
1409		25283110450000		$14,008
1410		25283110460000		$15,720

2012 EAV

Property Number

I4I1	25283110470000	$26,485
1412	25283110480000	$12,544
1413	25283110490000	$11,160
1414	25283110500000	$25,842
1415	25283110510000	$27,506
1416	25283110520000	$19,112
1417	25283110530000	$19,566
1418	25283110540000	$18,955
1419	25283110550000	$3,366
1420	25283110560000	$12,165
1421	25283110570000	$15,506
1422	25283110580000	$1,906
1423	25283110590000	$6,842
1424	25283110600000	$931
1425	25283110610000	$22,290
1426	25283110620000	$19,028
1427	25283110630000	$12,808
1428	25283110640000	$10,859
1429	25283110650000	$12,808
1430	25283110660000	$20,371
1431	25283110670000	$20,102
1432	25283110680000	$9,511
1433	25283120010000	$21,466
1434	25283120020000	$18,357
1435	25283120030000	$5,222
1436	25283120040000	$6,024
1437	25283120050000	$6,054
1438	25283120060000	$24,563
1439	25283120070000	$8,986
1440	25283120080000	$10,086
1441	25283120090000	$29,574
1442	25283120100000	$5,089
1443	25283120110000	$16,488
1444	25283120I20OOO	$26,521
1445	25283120130000	$15,756
1446	25283120140000	$4,927
1447	25283120150000	$19,364
1448	25283120160000	Exempt
1449	25283120170000	$16,660
1450	25283120180000	$20,416
1451	25283120190000	$12,951
1452	25283I2O20OO0O	$4,427
1453	25283I202IOOOO	$3,092
1454	25283120220000	$7,406
1455	25283I3OO1O0OO	$22,307
1456	25283130020000	$14,233
1457	25283130030000	$29,167

2012 EAV

Property Number

1458	2S283I30O400OO	$9,620
1459	25283I3O05O000	$14,530
1460	25283130060000	$22,515
1461	25283130070000	$3,880
1462	25283130080000	$20,655
1463	25283130090000	$3,880
1464	25283130100000	$5,822
1465	252831301IOOOO	$25,845
1466	25283130150000	$22,776
1467	2528313OI6O0OO	$3,880
1468	25283130170000	$12,093
1469	25283130180000	$21,073
1470	25283130190000	$26,112
1471	25283130200000	$7,763
1472	25283130230000	$27,130
1473	25283I3O24O0OO	$18,613
1474	25283130380000	$10,224
1475	23283130390000	$12,955
1476	2S283130400000	$15,455
1477	25283130410000	$19,476
1478	25283130420000	$15,540
1479	25283130430000	$23,034
1480	2S28313O44O0OO	$16,200
1481	23283130450000	$23,850
1482	25283130460000	$16,214
1483	25283130470000	$5,551
1484	25283130480000	$15,091
1485	25283130490000	$27,287
1486	25283I3050OOO0	$27,082
1487	25283130310000	$23,800
1488	25283130520000	$18,674
1489	23283130530000	$18,119
1490	25283130540000	$13,554
1491	25283140030000	$23,648
1492	23283140050000	$13,955
1493	25283140060000	$7,379
1494	2S283140O90000	$12,272
1495	25283140210000	$18,222
1496	23283140230000	$30,968
1497	25283140240000	$13,906
1498	2S28314O250000	$13,906
1499	25283140260000	$9,269
1500	25283140270000	$5,676
1501	25283140320000	$8,835
1502	2S283I4O33OOO0	$23,749
1503	25283140340000	$14,161
1504	25283I4O350O00	$8,286

D-8

82

November 15, 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

#	Property Number	2012 EAV
1505	25283140360000	$23,191
1506	25283140370000	$21,252
1507	23283140380000	$23,505
1508	2S283I40390000	$32,638
1509	25283140400000	$17,838
1510	25283140410000	$19,333
1511	25283140420000	$7,990
1512	25283140430000	$24,998
1513	2S283140440000	$14,101
1514	25283140460000	$18,898
1515	25283140470000	$22,327
1516	25283140480000	$18,615
1517	25283140520000	$5,479
1518	25283140530000	$19,383
1519	25283140540000	$5,434
1520	25283140550000	$19,454
1521	25283I4058OOO0	$620
1522	25283140590000	$3,280
1523	25283140600000	$38,397
1524	25283140610000	$1,939
1525	25283140620000	Exempt
1526	25283140630000	$14,754
1527	232831SOO20000	$6,531
1528	25283150030000	$10,549
1529	25283150040000	Exempt
1530	25283150050000	$3,880
1531	25283150060000	$3,880
1532	25283150070000	$25,624
1533	25283150080000	$4,267
1534	25283150090000	$14,386
1535	25283150100000	$8,382
1536	2528315O1I0O0O	$21,121
1537	25283150120000	$5,822
1538	25283150130000	$16,612
1539	25283150140000	$21,872
1540	25283150150000	$12,513
1541	25283150160000	$20,242
1542	25283150170000	$16,466
1543	25283150180000	$10,628
1544	25283150190000	$15,888
1545	25283150200000	$17,698
1546	25283150230000	$9,153
1547	25283150240000	$9,153
1548	25283150250000	$19,577
1549	25283150260000	$19,577
1550	25283150310000	$14,614
1551	25283I5032OOO0	$9,312

2012 EAV

Property Number

1552	25283150350000	$11,537
1553	25283150360000	$4,932
1554	25283150370000	$14,940
1555	25283130380000	$20,467
1556	25283150390000	$16,101
1557	25283150400000	$10,894
1558	25283150410000	$12,106
1559	25283150420000	$13,284
1560	25283150430000	$16,926
1561	25283150440000	$16,848
1562	25283150450000	$4,656
1563	25283150460000	$13,377
1564	25283150470000	$22,478
1565	25283160010000	Exempt
1566	2S283I60020000	Exempt
1567	25283160030000	Exempt
1568	25283160040000	Exempt
1569	23283160050000	Exempt
1570	25283160060000	Exempt
1571	25283160070000	Exempt
1572	25283160080000	Exempt
1573	25283160090000	Exempt
1574	25283160240000	$19,852
1575	25283160250000	$0
1576	25283160260000	$9,604
1577	25283I60270OO0	$18,074
1578	25283160280000	$10,353
1579	2S283160290000	$5,498
1580	25283160300000	$3,880
1581	25283160350000	$12,154
1582	25283160490000	$20,313
1583	25283160500000	$25,638
1584	25283160510000	$17,361
1585	25283160520000	$24,653
1586	25283160530000	$17,961
1587	25283160340000	$474
1588	25283160570000	$5,757
1589	25283160580000	$26,737
1590	25283160590000	$25,691
1591	25283160600000	$336,136
1592	25283170010000	$21,095
1593	25283170020000	$25,612
1594	25283170030000	$9,646
1595	25283170040000	$20,731
1596	25283170050000	$9,749
1597	25283170060000	$22,563
1598	25283170I80O00	$18,309

D-9

83

tt		Property Number		2012 EAV
1599		25283170190000		$27,158
1600		25283170200000		$6,916
1601		25283170210000		$8,313
1602		25283170220000		$21,342
1603		25283170260000		$11,253
1604		25283170270000		$26,028
1605		25283170280000		$9,017
1606		25283170440000		$16,197
1607		25283170450000		$2
1608		2S283170460000		$16,261
1609		25283170470000		$17,243
1610		25283170480000		$8,153
1611		25283170490000		$14,853
1612		25283170500000		$18,236
1613		25283170510000		$27,394
1614		25283170520000		$17,944
1615		25283170530000		$17,855
1616		25283170540000		$22,599
1617		25283170550000		$21,264
1618		25283170560000		$3,468
1619		25283170570000		$10,731
1620		25283170580000		$17,176
1621		25283170590000		$24,033
1622		25283170600000		$8,509
1623		25283170610000		$12,176
1624		25283170620000		$3,698
1625		25283170630000		$3,689
1626		25283170640000		$5,686
1627		25283220250000		$6,726
1628		25283220260000		$6,608
1629		25283220270000		$3,880
1630		25283220280000		$0
1631		25283220390000		$14,608
1632		25283220400000		$21,976
1633		25283220410000		$7,207
1634		25283220420000		$4,932
1635		23283220450000		$17,622
1636		25283220490000		$13,040
1637		25283220500000		$30,101
1638		25283220520000		$4,986
1639		25283220530000		$22,927
1640		25283220540000		$17,375
1641		25283220550000		$4,400
1642		25283220570000		$19,168
1643		25283220580000		SI4.I68
1644		25283220590000		$6,212
1645		25283220600000		$18,180
	Property Number		2012 EAV
1646	25283220610000		$17,355
1647	25283220630000		$841,677
1648	25283230130000		$17,414
1649	25283230140000		$18,598
1650	25283230430000		$8,927
1651	25283230440000		$8,927
1652	25283230450000		$13,379
1653	25283230460000		$12,569
1654	25283230470000		$4,960
1655	25283230480000		$17,010
1656	25283230490000		$15,995
1657	25283230500000		$16,368
1658	25283230510000		$23,533
1659	25283230520000		$21,931
1660	25283230530000		$17,383
1661	25283230540000		$17,931
1662	25283230550000		$20,792
1663	25283230560000		$11,443
1664	25283230570000		$17,417
1665	25283230580000		$12,431
1666	25283230590000		$23,946
1667	25283230600000		$24,013
1668	25283230610000		$756
1669	23283230620000		$3,641
1670	23283230630000		$23,317
1671	25283230640000		$5,953
1672	25283230650000		$26,072
1673	25283230660000		$10,424
1674	25283230670000		$13,910
1675	25283230680000		$15,535
1676	25283230690000		$23,014
1677	25283230700000		$11,993
1678	25283230710000		$17,151
1679	25283230720000		$14,095
1680	25283230730000		$21,272
1681	25283230740000		$10,293
1682	25283230750000		$22,293
1683	25283230760000		$19,984
1684	25284000010000		Exempt
1685	25284000030000		$9,275
1686	25284000040000		$12,650
1687	25284000050000		$10,336
1688	25284000060000		$26,841
1689	25284000070000		$22,240
1690	25284000080000		$3,664
1691	25284000090000		$2,749
1692	25284000100000		$28,457

November 15, 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

1693	25284000IS0000	$11,107
1694	25284000160000	$17,381
1695	25284000210000	$11,799
1696	25284000220000	$4,676
1697	25284000230000	$15,695
1698	25284000240000	$7,620
1699	25284000250000	$14,286
1700	2S2840O02600OO	$23,755
1701	25284000270000	$28,788
1702	25284000290000	$22,302
1703	25284000300000	$14,805
1704	25284000310000	$3,765
1705	25284000320000	$2,670
1706	25284000340000	$22,237
1707	25284000350000	$8,026
1708	2S284000360000	$25,545
1709	25284000370000	$15,035
1710	25284000380000	$21,351
1711	25284000390000	$1,238
1712	25284000400000	$16,219
1713	25284000410000	$7,945
1714	25284000420000	$13,803
1715	25284000430000	$309
1716	25284000440000	$28,623
1717	25284060010000	$24,061
1718	25284060020000	$26,311
1719	25284060030000	$10,532
1720	25284060040000	$21,098
1721	25284060050000	$19,678
1722	25284060060000	$15,689
1723	25284060070000	$20,719
1724	25284060080000	$17,527
1725	25284060090000	$22,495
1726	25284060100000	$16,289
1727	25284060110000	$12,513
1728	25284060120000	$18,303
1729	25284060130000	$10,237
1730	25284060140000	$29,167
1731	25284060150000	$4,598
1732	25284060160000	$5,479
1733	25284060170000	$19,415
1734	25284060180000	$5,479
1735	25284060190000	$0
1736	25284060200000	$12,774
1737	25284060210000	$20,733
1738	25284060220000	$13,024
1739	25284060230000	$12,970

1740	25284060240000	$21,367
1741	25284060250000	$15,327
1742	25284060260000	$13,781
1743	25284060270000	$27,596
1744	25284060280000	$13,018
1745	25284060290000	$5,479
1746	2S2840603O00O0	$14,741
1747	25284060310000	$23,923
1748	25284060320000	$17,341
1749	25284060330000	$13,526
1750	252840700IO0OO	$19,488
1751	25284070020000	$11,040
1752	25284070030000	$23,797
1753	25284070040000	$13,866
1754	25284070050000	$23,014
1755	25284070060000	$18,098
1756	25284070070000	$5,782
1757	23284070080000	$3,305
1758	25284O7OO9O000	$15,007
1759	25284070100000	$16,979
1760	25284070110000	$16,921
1761	2S2840701200OO	$27,273
1762	25284070130000	$15,728
1763	25284070140000	$23,912
1764	25284070150000	$16,800
1765	25284070180000	$18,009
1766	25284070190000	$27,026
1767	25284070200000	$18,750
1768	25284070210000	$16,665
1769	25284070220000	$3,506
1770	25284070230000	$17,888
1771	25284070240000	$14,132
1772	25284070250000	$19,782
1773	25284070260000	$11,659
1774	25284070270000	$23,623
1775	25284070280000	$23,452
1776	25284070290000	$7,173
1777	25284070300000	$2,123
1778	25284070340000	$22,212
1779	25284070350000	$21,743
1780	25284070360000	$268
1781	25284070370000	$16,278
1782	25284070380000	$26,072
1783	25284080250000	$13,784
1784	25284080260000	$19,044
1785	25284080270000	$17,630
1786	25284080280000	$21,721

1787	25284080290000	$27,461
1788	25284080300000	$17,083
1789	25284080310000	$14,656
1790	25284080320000	$11,803
1791	25284080330000	$21,912
1792	25284080340000	$21,603
1793	25284080330000	$11,104
1794	25284080360000	$21,909
1795	25284080370000	$9,656
1796	25284080380000	$21,912
1797	25284080390000	$11,441
1798	25284080400000	$18,371
1799	25284080410000	$27,596
1800	25284080420000	$22,248
1801	25284080430000	$24,936
1802	23284080440000	$11,416
1803	25284080450000	$20,686
1804	25284080460000	$23,416
1805	25284080470000	$11,138
1806	25284080480000	$16,084
1807	25284080490000	$30,671
1808	25284080500000	$20,587
1809	25284080510000	$15,686
1810	25284080520000	$16,923
1811	25284080530000	$15,270
1812	25284080540000	$15,587
1813	25284080550000	$22,616
1814	25322010010000	Exempt
1815	25322010210000	$23,820
1816	25322010300000	$13,517
1817	25322010310000	$21,648
1818	25322010320000	$22,133
1819	25322010330000	$19,028
1820	25322010340000	$16,558
1821	25322010350000	$15,933
1822	25322010360000	$28,328
1823	253220I03700OO	$25,913
1824	25322010380000	$27,933
1825	25322010390000	$25,452
1826	253220IO400000	$28,923
1827	253220IO4I0O00	$22,714
1828	25322010420000	$20,933
1829	253220IO43OO0O	$20,265
1830	25322010440000	$20,338
1831	25322010450000	$28,656
1832	25322010460000	Exempt
1833	25322010470000	$28,168

1834	25322010480000	$28,973
1835	25322010490000	$27,944
1836	25322010500000	$21,101
1837	25322010510000	$21,280
1838	25322020190000	$18,537
1839	25322020370000	$29,021
1840	25322020460000	$30,424
1841	25322020470000	$12,047
1842	25322020480000	$26,058
1843	25322020490000	$16,474
1844	2S322O2O5OOO0O	$12,795
1845	25322020510000	$17,282
1846	25322020520000	$20,220
1847	25322020530000	$28,684
1848	25322020540000	$26,058
1849	25322020550000	$13,626
1850	25322020560000	$30,505
1851	25322020570000	$0
1852	25322020580000	$24,198
1853	25322020590000	$24,305
1854	25322020600000	$18,505
1855	25322020610000	$10,870
1856	25322020620000	$21,264
1857	25322020630000	$18,292
1858	25322020640000	$15,568
1859	25322020650000	$21,359
1860	25322020660000	$16,954
1861	25322020670000	$21,255
1862	25322020680000	$28,985
1863	25322020690000	$20,500
1864	25322020700000	$21,149
1865	25322020710000	$21,954
1866	25322020720000	$16,569
1867	25322020730000	$21,359
1868	25322020740000	$29,700
1869	25322020750000	$21,774
1870	25322020760000	$0
1871	25322020770000	$28,816
1872	25322020780000	$24,987
1873	25322020790000	$15,700
1874	25322020800000	$15,868
1875	25322020810000	$25,220
1876	25322020820000	$22,537
1877	25322030160000	$27,630
1878	25322030410000	$20,823
1879	25322030420000	$29,024
1880	25322030430000	$16,663

D-1

0 84

November 15,2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

Property Number

2012 EAV

1881	25322030440000	$0
1882	25322030450000	$32,915
1883	25322030460000	$27,127
1884	25322030470000	$27,862
1885	25322030480000	$20,203
1886	25322030490000	$27,980
1887	25322030500000	$15,991
1888	25322030510000	$25,318
1889	25322030520000	$28,785
1890	25322030530000	$28,586
1891	23322030540000	$31,052
1892	25322030550000	$14,995
1893	25322030560000	$28,830
1894	25322030570000	$28,858
1895	25322030580000	$27,972
1896	25322030590000	$15,161
1897	25322030600000	$27,868
1898	2532203061OO0O	$25,663
1899	2S32203O62000O	$27,585
1900	25322030630000	$19,844
1901	25322030640000	$21,878
1902	25322030650000	$14,406
1903	25322030660000	$26,897
1904	25322O3069O0OO	$25,943
1905	25322030700000	$18,551
1906	25322030710000	$28,575
1907	25322030720000	$17,925
1908	25322030730000	$29,431
1909	25322030740000	$5,013
1910	25322030750000	$16,337
1911	2S322040110000	$21,443
1912	25322040120000	$24,860
1913	25322O40I30OOO	$19,600
1914	25322040250000	$18,711
1915	25322040350000	$15,989
1916	25322040360000	$20,537
1917	25322040370000	$17,002
1918	25322040380000	$28,701
1919	25322040390000	$18,708
1920	25322040400000	$25,365
1921	25322040410000	$23,559
1922	25322040420000	$13,941
1923	25322040430000	$21,917
1924	25322040440000	$28,670
1925	25322040450000	$27,254
1926	25322040460000	$24,123
1927	25322040470000	$15,481

1928	25322040480000	$4,056
1929	25322040490000	$19,603
1930	25322040500000	$20,402
1931	25322040510000	$22,582
1932	25322040520000	$17,288
1933	25322040530000	$14,990
1934	25322040540000	$4,562
1935	25322040550000	$24,557
1936	25322040560000	$23,065
1937	25322040570000	$26,100
1938	25322040580000	$21,401
1939	25322040590000	$20,630
1940	25322050060000	$15,461
1941	25322050070000	$11,820
1942	25322050080000	$23,575
1943	25322050090000	$19,841
1944	25322050140000	$17,717
1945	25322050150000	$16,898
1946	25322050160000	$47,490
1947	25322050170000	$47,490
1948	25322050280000	$28,182
1949	25322050290000	$21,600
1950	25322050300000	$19,457
1951	25322050310000	$26,288
1952	25322050320000	$18,430
1953	25322050330000	$28,522
1954	25322050340000	$28,438
1955	25322050350000	Exempt
1956	25322070040000	$3,706
1957	25322070050000	$3,706
1958	25322070060000	$19,785
1959	25322070070000	$22,262
1960	25322070080000	$24,142
1961	25322070170000	$14,585
1962	25322070180000	$14,585
1963	25322070190000	$0
1964	25322070200000	$12,343
1965	25322070210000	$12,343
1966	25322070220000	$19,998
1967	25322070230000	$19,028
1968	25322070240000	$24,824
1969	25322070250000	$22,371
1970	25322070260000	$27,141
1971	25322070300000	$17,546
1972	2532207O31OO00	$(7,720
1973	25322070320000	$18,132
1974	25322070330000	$22,139

1975	25322070340000	$20,641
1976	25322070350000	$25,570
1977	25322070360000	$20,638
1978	25322070370000	$20,638
1979	25322070380000	$26,070
1980	25322070390000	$25,556
198)	25322070400000	$24,465
1982	25322070410000	$7,452
1983	25322070630000	$3,684
1984	25322070640000	$3,137
1985	25322070650000	$4,186
1986	25322070660000	$5,474
1987	25322070680000	$6,080
1988	25322070690000	$6,543
1989	25322070700000	$3,563
1990	25322070710000	$3,563
1991	25322070720000	$6,540
1992	25322070730000	$5,050
1993	25322070740000	$6,164
1994	25322080010000	$24,490
1995	25322080100000	$20,481
1996	25322080200000	$24,339
1997	25322080290000	$25,234
1998	25322080540000	$22,077
1999	25322080550000	$21,550
2000	25322080560000	$27,007
2001	25322080570000	$25,450
2002	25322080580000	$25,506
2003	25322080590000	$25,727
2004	25322080600000	$0
2005	25322080610000	$22,192
2006	25322080620000	$25,957
2007	25322080630000	$8,361
2008	25322080640000	$18,222
2009	25322080650000	$28,383
2010	2S322O8066000O	$22,891
2011	25322080670000	$23,404
2012	25322080680000	$21,320
2013	25322080690000	$29,192
2014	25322080700000	$5,658
2015	253220807I0O00	$21,968
2016	25322080720000	$22,192
2017	25322080730000	$21,662
2018	25322080740000	$21,163
2019	2S3220S0750000	$22,290
2020	25322080760000	$13,455
2021	25322080770000	$15,658

2022	25322080780000	$21,612
2023	25322080790000	$8,430
2024	25322080800000	$22,391
2025	25322080810000	$25,405
2026	25322080820000	$9,903
2027	25322080830000	$23,477
2028	23322080840000	$20,015
2029	25322080850000	$19,827
2030	25322080860000	$0
2031	25322080870000	$22,304
2032	25322080880000	$27,276
2033	25322080890000	$18,435
2034	25322080900000	$30,567
2035	25322080910000	$8,405
2036	25322080920000	$3,576
2037	25322080930000	$20,919
2038	25322080940000	$22,989 '
2039	25322080950000	$23,477
2040	25322080960000	$30,373
2041	25322090310000	$27,562
2042	25322090590000	$12,282
2043	25322090600000	$2,800
2044	23322090610000	$25,542
2045	25322090620000	$20,127
2046	25322090630000	$16,573
2047	25322090640000	$15,576
2048	23322090650000	$24,723
2049	25322090660000	$16,367
2050	25322090670000	$8,371
2051	25322090680000	$22,347
2052	23322090690000	$27,167
2053	25322090700000	$15,228
2054	2332209071O0O0	$22,961
2055	25322090720000	$12,869
2056	25322090730000	$17,600
2057	23322090740000	$18,149
2058	25322090750000	$29,434
2059	25322090760000	$15,610
2060	23322090770000	$23,578
2061	25322090780000	$18,747
2062	25322090790000	$16,987
2063	25322090800000	$21,505
2064	25322090810000	$17,035
2065	25322090820000	$25,250
2066	2S322090S30000	S22.3I0
2067	25322090840000	$28,036
2068	25322090850000	$16,230

D-ll 85

November 15. 2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

2012 EAV

Property Number

2069	25322090860000	$37,724
2070	25322090870000	522,128
2071	25322090880000	Exempt
2072	25322090890000	$29,304
2073	25322090900000	$19,962
2074	253220909I00OO	$16,005
2075	25322090920000	$20,725
2076	25322090930000	$13,432
2077	25322090940000	$21,286
2078	25322090950000	$8,474
2079	25322090960000	$19,962
2080	25322090970000	$19,300
2081	25322090980000	$14,962
2082	25322090990000	$28,640
2083	25322091000000	$22,035
2084	25322091010000	$4,529
2085	25322091020000	$0
2086	25322091030000	$22,251
2087	25322091040000	$15,475
2088	25322091050000	$18,391
2089	25322091060000	$25,346
2090	25322091070000	$21,182
2091	25322091080000	$19,151
2092	25322091090000	$19,325
2093	25322100100000	$11,148
2094	25322100140000	$30,592
2095	25322I0OI5OO00	$27,402
2096	25322100160000	$22,459
2097	25322100170000	$22,619
2098	25322100180000	$0
2099	25322100190000	$24,989
2)00	25322100200000	$26,970
2101	25322100210000	$24,989
2102	25322I002400OO	$22,588
2103	25322100250000	$13,725
2104	25322100260000	$26,218
2105	25322100270000	$15,897
2106	25322100280000	$23,949
2107	25322100290000	$21,962
2108	25322100300000	$24,709
2109	25322100310000	$26,404
2110	25322100320000	$36,133
2111	25322100330000	$28,569
2112	25322II0O400O0	$28,095
2113	25322110330000	$21,199
2114	25322110340000	$27,764
2115	25322110350000	$23,573

#	Property Number	2012 EAV
2116	25322110360000	$18,312
2117	25322110370000	$19,347
2118	25322110380000	$23,831
2119	25322110390000	SO
2120	25322110400000	$31,066
2121	25322110410000	$15,921
2122	25322110430000	$25,783
2123	25322110450000	$232,943
2124	25322110470000	$104,245
2125	25322110480000	$186,710
2126	25322120010000	$5,986
2127	25322120020000	$9,972
2128	25322120030000	$21,034
2129	25322120200000	$19,765
2130	25322120210000	$24,942
2131	25322120220000	$32,130
2132	25322120230000	$22,170
2133	25322120240000	$24,451
2134	25322120250000	$7,748
2135	25322120260000	$26,134
2136	25322120270000	$23,082
2137	25322120280000	$14,384
2138	25322120290000	$15,531
2139	25322120300000	$22,641
2140	25322120310000	$23,082
2141	25322120320000	$17,894
2142	25322120330000	$26,370
2143	25322120340000	$17,518
2144	25322I203SOO0O	$25,110
2145	25322120360000	$21,971
2146	25322120370000	$22,077
2147	25322120380000	$21,202
2148	25322120410000	$15,733
2149	25322120420000	$24,221
2150	25322120430000	$29,877
2151	25322120440000	$25,082
2152	25322I2O450O0O	$1,861
2153	25322120460000	$16,205
2154	25322120470000	$21,205
2155	25322I2048O0O0	$2,141
2156	25322120490000	$15,728
2157	25322120500000	$22,902
2158	25322120510000	$17,117
2159	25322120520000	$20,004
2160	25322120530000	$8,571
2161	25322I2O54OO0O	$23,887
2162	25322120550000	$35,881

#		Property Number	2012 EAV
2163		25322120560000	$1,551
2164		25322130070000	$22,330
2165		25322130080000	$27,439
2166		25322130090000	$20,666
2167		25322130170000	$26,019
2168		25322130180000	$27,192
2169		25322130190000	$29,978
2170		25322130200000	$14,392
2171		25322130210000	$28,499
2172		25322130220000	$28,499
2173		25322130230000	$28,499
2174		25322130240000	$28,499
2)75		25322130250000	$7,022
2176		25322130260000	$6,593
2177		25322130270000	$6,551
2178		25322130280000	$6,537
2179		25322130290000	Exempt
2180		25322130300000	Exempt
2181		25322130310000	Exempt
2182		25322130320000	Exempt
2183		25322130330000	Exempt
2184		25322130340000	Exempt
2185		25322130400000	Exempt
2186		25322130410000	Exempt
2187		25322130420000	Exempt
2188		25322130430000	Exempt
2189		25322130440000	Exempt
2190		25322130450000	Exempt
2191		25322130460000	Exempt
2192		25322130470000	$3,185
2193		25322I3O4900OO	$17,010
2194		25322130500000	$14,467
2195		25322130510000	$27,116
2196		25322130520000	$15,181
2197		25322130530000	$22,147
2198		2S322I30S40000	$16,628
2199		25322I30550OO0	$26,137
2200		25322130560000	$21,381
2201		25322130570000	$27,108
2202		25322130580000	$18,163
2203		25322130590000	Exempt
2204		25322140010000	$28,034
2205		25322140020000	$32,057
2206		25322140030000	$21,830
2207		25322140040000	$15,918
2208		25322140050000	$30,115
2209		25322140060000	$28,365
	Properly Number		2012 EAV
2210	25322140070000		$24,266
2211	25322140080000		$25,494
2212	25322140090000		$28,241
2213	25322140100000		$31,397
2214	253221401IOOOO		$9,441
2215	25322140120000		$37,127
2216	25322140130000		$23,620
2217	23322140140000		$29,274
2218	2S322140150000		$35,510
2219	25322140160000		$37,943
2220	25322140170000		$20,141
2221	25322140180000		$41,902
2222	25322140190000		$29,675
2223	25322140350000		$22,630
2224	25322140360000		$27,203
2225	25322140370000		$28,151
2226	25322140380000		$17,189
2227	25322140390000		$17,571
2228	25322140400000		$33,563
2229	23322140410000		$18.4%
2230	23322140420000		$17,902
2231	25322140430000		$20,991
2232	25322140440000		$21,056
2233	25322140480000		$25,250
2234	25322140490000		$32,904
2235	25331000040000		$131,931
2236	25331000050000		$29,852
2237	2S33I0O0O6000O		$175,280
2238	2S33I0OO070OO0		$139,494
2239	25331000090000		$19,875
2240	25331000100000		$23,244
2241	2533IOOOI10000		$18,152
2242	25331000120000		$21,533
2243	2S331OO0130000		$16,721
2244	25331000140000		$29,689
2245	2S33IOOO15O0OO		$24,325
2246	25331000160000		$31,917
2247	25331010060000		$5,216
2248	25331010070000		$15,390
2249	25331010130000		$38,080
2250	2533IOIOI40000		$55,621
2251	2533IO1OI5OO0O		$66,347
2252	25331010160000		$56,881
2253	25331010170000		$38,131
2254	25331010320000		$12,607
2255	25331010370000		$31,252
2256	25331010380000		$24,173

D-12 86

November 15,2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

2012 EAV

Property Number

2257	25331010400000	131.672
2258	253310IO41O000	$23,733
2259	25331010420000	$29,215
2260	2533IO1O43OO0O	$18,733
2261	25331010440000	$25,873
2262	25331010450000	$23,690
2263	25331010460000	$26,028
2264	25331010470000	$18,200
2265	25331010480000	$23,026
2266	25331010490000	$27,169
2267	25331010500000	$19,268
2268	25331010530000	$9,606
2269	25331010550000	$65,171
2270	25331010560000	$199,234
2271	25331010570000	$176,497
2272	25331020010000	$11,266
2273	25331020020000	$9,698
2274	25331020030000	$3,945
2275	2S331020O40000	$12,621
2276	25331020050000	$12,621
2277	25331020060000	$20,181
2278	25331020070000	$21,987
2279	23331020140000	$19,650
2280	25331020150000	$23,960
2281	25331020160000	$15,724
2282	25331020170000	$5,887
2283	2533102O18OO0O	$30,390
2284	25331020190000	$42,390
2285	25331020200000	$35,449
2286	25331020210000	$3,892
2287	25331020220000	$23,343
2288	25331020270000	$21,306
2289	25331020280000	$4,318
2290	25331020290000	$17,986
2291	25331020300000	$25,873
2292	25331020310000	$37,140
2293	25331020320000	$49,059
2294	25331020330000	$8,033
2295	25331020340000	$16,064
2296	25331020350000	$28,847
2297	25331020360000	$26,176
2298	2533102O4IO000	$7,878
2299	25331020420000	$0
2300	25331020430000	$30,343
2301	25331020440000	$31,111
2302	25331020460000	$22,094
2303	25331020470000	$28,048

2012 EAV

Property Number

2304	25331020480000	$1,162
2305	25331020500000	$18,458
2306	25331020510000	$20,921
2307	25331020520000	$28,850
2308	25331020530000	$22,793
2309	25331020540000	$24,608
2310	25331020550000	$18,408
2311	25331020560000	$14,025
2312	25331020570000	$31,995
2313	25331100010000	$19,751
2314	25331100020000	$16,418
2315	25331100030000	$34,938
2316	25331100040000	$16,082
2317	25331100050000	$65,626
2318	25331100060000	$65,626
2319	25331100100000	$40,684
2320	2533110011O0OO	$40,684
2321	25331100120000	$16,895
2322	25331100130000	$75,819
2323	25331100140000	$52,518
2324	25331100150000	$3,409
2325	2S33110016OOOO	$3,409
2326	25331100170000	$3,409
2327	25331100180000	$3,409
2328	25331100190000	$3,409
2329	25331100200000	$3,409
2330	25331100210000	$3,409
2331	25331100220000	$6,248
2332	25331100230000	$6,248
2333	25331IO0240OOO	$6,248
2334	25331100250000	$10,743
2335	25331IO026O0OO	$15,636
2336	25331100270000	$28,149
2337	25331IOO280OOO	$19,566
2338	25331100290000	$21,137
2339	25331100300000	$18,088
2340	25331100310000	$15,293
2341	25331100320000	$16,525
2342	25331100330000	$18,222
2343	25331100370000	$8,921
2344	2533I10O380O00	$22,939
2345	2533II00430000	$16,834
2346	25331100440000	$18,747
2347	2533II0O450O00	$20,413
2348	25331100480000	$20,318
2349	25331100490000	$11,222
2350	25331100500000	$25,806

2012 EAV

Property Number

2351	25331100510000	$6,240
2352	25331100520000	$68,939
2353	25331100530000	$65,803
2354	25331100540000	$28,791
2355	25331100550000	$30,455
2356	25331110160000	$22,265
2357	25331110170000	$18,629
2358	25331110280000	$19,563
2359	25331110290000	$7,133
2360	25331110300000	$29,403
2361	25331110310000	$21,704
2362	25331110320000	$2,539
2363	25331110330000	$2,835
2364	25331110340000	$28,373
2365	25331110350000	$16,496
2366	25331110360000	$18,365
2367	25331110370000	$31,787
2368	2533I11O420O0O	$20,062
2369	2S33111O43OOO0	$22,619
2370	25331110440000	$21,872
2371	2533111O45000O	$12,724
2372	25331110460000	$21,331
2373	25331110470000	$27,526
2374	25331110480000	$12,558
2375	23331110490000	$28,785
2376	25331110500000	$25,455
2377	25331110510000	$16,676
2378	253311IO52O0O0	$19,735
2379	25331110530000	$28,118
2380	2S331110540000	$22,947
2381	25331110550000	$17,563
2382	25331110560000	$9,580
2383	25331110570000	$16,219
2384	25331110580000	$22,506
2385	25331110590000	$16,289
2386	25331110600000	$23,289
2387	25331110610000	$33,782
2388	25331110620000	$29,316
2389	2533II10630000	$16,020
2390	25331110640000	$27,697
2391	25331110650000	$36,680
2392	25331110660000	$31,218
2393	25331170010000	Exempt
2394	25331170020000	Exempt
2395	25331170030000	$3,409
2396	25331170040000	$3,409
2397	2533 1170050000	$3,409
*	Property Number		2012 EAV
2398	25331170060000		Exempt
2399	25331170070000		Exempt
2400	25331170080000		Exempt
2401	25331170140000		$24,161
2402	25331170180000		Exempt
2403	25331170540000		$31,151
2404	25331170550000		$29,136
2405	25331170560000		$25,531
2406	25331170570000		$26,768
2407	25331170580000		$27,043
2408	25331170590000		$24,322
2409	25331170600000		$25,278
2410	25331170610000		$32,228
2411	25331170620000		$24,078
2412	25331170630000		$29,352
2413	25331170640000		$24,644
2414	25331170650000		$26,322
2415	25331170660000		$23,065
2416	25331170690000		$29,672
2417	25331170700000		$16,683
2418	25331170710000		$18,160
2419	25331170720000		$33,580
2420	25331170730000		$20,809
2421	25331170740000		$25,910
2422	25331170750000		$26,746
2423	25331170760000		$26,502
2424	25331170770000		$24,028
2425	25331170920000		$26,822
2426	25331170930000		$23,435
2427	25331170960000		$28,656
2428	25331170970000		$22,579
2429	25331170980000		$21,869
2430	25331170990000		$22,765
2431	25331171000000		$24,745
2432	25331171010000		$27,506
2433	25331171020000		$28,735
2434	25331171030000		$25,618
2435	25331171040000		$28,508
2436	25331171050000		$26,928
2437	25331171060000		$27,983
2438	25331210010000		$23,146
2439	25331210020000		$22,790
2440	25331210030000		$23,146
2441	25331210040000		$24,729
2442	25331210050000		$12,729
2443	25331210060000		$23,581
2444	25331210070000		$23,643

D-1

3 87

November 15,2013

APPENDIX D INITIAL EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE (EAV) OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA 2012 EAV - $44,339,479

2012 EAV

Property Number

2445		25331210080000	$21,626
2446		25331210090000	$2,871
2447		2533I21O1O0OOO	$30,761
#	Property Number			2012 EAV
2448	25331210110000			$31,103
2449	253312IOI20000			$18,671
2450	25331210130000			$17,947
	Property Number				2012 EAV
	Total EAV				$44,339,479

Property Number

2012 EAV

D-14

88

November 15, 2013

APPENDIX E

FIRST AMENDED PLAN: and HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT

E-1

89

4/9/2003

106129

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Authenticated By:

Registrar

AUTHORIZATION FOR AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO 119^th AND HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT.

The Committee on Finance submitted the following report:

'^:      CHICAGO, April 9, 2003.

To the President and Members of the City Council:

Your Committee on Finance, having had under consideration an ordinance authorizing an amendment to the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area concerning the Equalized Assessed Valuation Table, having had the same under advisement, begs leave to report and recommend that Your Honorable Body Pass the proposed ordinance transmitted herewith.

This recommendation was concurred in by a viva VOCe vote of the members of the Committee.

Respectfully submitted,

(Signed) EDWARD M. BURKE,

Chairman.

On motion of Alderman Burke, the said proposed ordinance transmitted with the foregoing committee report was Passed by yeas and nays as follows:

90

106130

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Yeas — Aldermen Granato, Haithcock, Tillman, Preckwinkle, Hairston, Lyle, Beavers, Stroger, Beale, Pope, Balcer, Frias, Olivo, Burke, T. Thomas, Coleman, L. Thomas, Murphy, Rugai, Troutman, DeVille, Munoz, Zalewski, Chandler, Solis, Ocasio, Burnett, E. Smith, Cat-others, Wojcik, Matlak, Mell, Austin, Colom, Banks, Allen, Laurino, Doherty, Natarus, Daley, Tunney, Levar, Shiller, Schulter, M. Smith, Moore, Stone — 47.

Nays — None.

Alderman Beavers moved to reconsider the foregoing vote. The motion was lost. The following is said ordinance as passed:

WHEREAS, Pursuant to ordinances adopted on February 6, 2002, and published in the Journal of the Proceedings of the City Council for such date (the "Journal of Proceedings") at pages 78512 to 78658, and in accordance with the provisions of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/ 11-74.4- 1 et. seq., as amended (the "Act"), the City Council (the "Corporate Authorities") of the City of Chicago (the "City"): (i) approved a redevelopment plan and project (the "Plan") for a portion of the City known as "1 19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area" (the "Area") (the "Plan Ordinance") ; (ii) designated the Area as a "redevelopment project area"; and (iii) adopted tax increment allocation financing for the Area; and

WHEREAS, Section 5/ 1 l-74.4-3(n)(F) of the Act requires a redevelopment plan to include the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("E.A.V.") of a redevelopment project area; and

WHEREAS, The Plan, attached as Exhibit A to the Plan Ordinance, included the 1999 E.A.V. and contemplated in Section 8 of the Plan that if the 2000 E.A.V. became available prior to the date of the adoption of the Plan by the City Council, then the City would update the Plan by replacing the 1999 E.A.V. with the 2000 E.A.V. in order to comply with the Act; and

WHEREAS, The 2000 E.A.V. became available prior to the date of the adoption of the Plan Ordinance by the City Council, but after the Plan had been submitted to the Community Development Commission to set a public hearing pursuant to Sections 5/ 1 1-74.4-4 and 5/ 1 1-74.4-5 of the Act, and was not inserted in the Plan prior to its adoption by ordinance; and

WHEREAS, The Corporate Authorities desire to amend the Plan to update the E.A.V. to conform the Plan to Section 1 l-74.4-3(n)(F) of the Act, and to make other, minor changes; and

91

4/9/2003

106131

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

WHEREAS, Section 5/1 l-74.4-5(c) of the Act permits amendments for such changes to a redevelopment plan to be made without a public hearing, provided that the City shall give notice of such changes by mail to each affected taxing district and each registrant in the interested parties registry for the Area, and by publication in a newspaper of general circulation within the affected taxing district not later than ten (10) days following the adoption by ordinance of such changes; now, therefore,

Be It Ordained by the City Council of the City of Chicago:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

SECTION 2. Amendments To Redevelopment Plan. The City, pursuant to Section 5/1 1-74.4-5 of the Act, hereby amends the Plan, as previously published in the Journal of Proceedings, by the amendments set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and approves the Plan, as amended, the amended version of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

SECTION 3. Invalidity Of Any Section. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance.

SECTION 4. Superseder. All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage.

Exhibits "A" and "B" referred to in this ordinance read as follows:

Exhibit "A". (To Ordinance)

Amendments  To  The Plan.

The Plan, as previously published in the Journal of the Proceedings of the City Council for February 6, 2002 (the "Journal of Proceedings'') at pages 78512 to 78658, is hereby amended as follows. Page number references refer to the page numbers in such Journal of Proceedings.

92

106132

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

2. The date of the Plan shall be "June 29, 200 1, Revised as of January 24, 2003".

(2)      The first two (2) sentences in the last paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan, entitled, "Eligibility of the Project Area for Designation as a Blighted Area", which appear on page 78527, are hereby amended to state:

"Despite the lack of private sector investment, equalized assessed value (E.A.V.) within the Area grew from approximately Fifteen Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($15,800,000) in 1996 to Eighteen Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($18,700,000) in 2000. However, for this period, the E.A.V. of the Area grew at a slower rate (seventeen and seven-tenths percent (17.7%)) than that of the City (thirty-three and one-tenth percent (33.1%))".

(3) The first paragraph in the subsection, entitled, "Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation", in Section 8 of the Plan, which appears on page 78544, is hereby amended in its entirety to state:

"The purpose of identifying the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("E.A.V.") of the Project Area is to provide an estimate of the initial E.A.V., which the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental E.A.V. and incremental property, taxes of the Project Area. The 2000 E.A.V. of all taxable parcels in the Area is Eighteen Million Six Hundred Eighty-nine Thousand Thirty-four Dollars ($18,689,034). This total E.A.V. amount by P.I.N, is summarized in Appendix D. The E.A.V. is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk and shall become the Certified Initial E.A.V. from which all incremental property taxes in the Area will be calculated by Cook County."

1. The second paragraph in the subsection, entitled "Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation", in Section 8 of the Plan, which appears on page 78545, is hereby deleted in its entirety.
2. Table A, entitled, "Comparative Increases in E.A.V.", in Appendix C of the Plan, which appears on page 78574, is hereby amended in its entirety to state:

93

4/9/2003

106133

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

	2000 1999 I		1998	1997	1996
Property within the Study Area	$18,689,034 4.5%	$17,878,188 6.5%	$16,784,870 -1.7%	$17,073,159 8.1%	$15,799,509 -0.5%
City of Chicago	14.5%	4.2%	1.7%	8.4%	1.2%

(6) Appendix D of the Plan, entitled "Initial Equalized Assessed Value (E.A.V.) of Property Within the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area", which appears on page 78582, shall be amended by updating the E.A.V. dollar amount for each parcel, or Property Identification Number, from the 1999 value to the 2000 value. A copy of such updated appendix is included in the amended Plan, attached to this ordinance as Exhibit B.

Exhibit "B". (To Ordinance)

11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project. June 29, 2001 Revised January 24, 2003

1.

Introduction.

This document presents a Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and Project (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/1 1-74.4-1, et seq.) (1996 State Bar Edition), as amended (the "Act") for the 119^th And Halsted neighborhood located in the City of Chicago, Illinois (the "Project Area"). The Project Area is adjacent to the existing West Pullman Industrial Park Conservation Area. The Project Area boundaries are

94

106134

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

irregular, generally extending north/south along South Halsted Street from West 11 1^th Street to West 123^rd Street and east/west along West 119^th Street from South Wentworth Avenue to South Morgan Street. The Project Area is comprised largely of commercial property, which is the predominant use along both South Halsted Street and West 1 19 Street. It should be noted that a significant amount of residential use is also present within the Project Area, located largely south of West 119^,h Street and east of South Halsted Street. The Plan responds to problem conditions within the Project Area and reflects a commitment by the City of Chicago (the "City") to improve and revitalize the Project Area.

The Plan presents research and analysis undertaken to document the eligibility of the Area for designation as a "conservation area" tax increment financing ("T.I.F.") district. The need for public intervention, goals and objectives, land-use policies and other policy materials are presented in the Plan. The results of a study documenting the eligibility of the Area as a conservation area are presented in Appendix C, Eligibility Study, (the "Study").

In adopting the Act, the Illinois State Legislature found at 5/ ll-74.4-2(a) that:

, , . there exist in many municipalities within this State blighted, conservation and industrial park conservation areas as defined herein; that the conservation areas are rapidly deteriorating and declining and may soon become blighted areas if their decline is not checked. . .

and at 5/1 l-74.4-2(b) that:

, , . in order to promote and protect the health, safety, morals and welfare of the public, that blighted conditions need to be eradicated and conservation measures instituted, and that redevelopment of such areas be undertaken. . . The eradication of blighted areas and treatment and improvement of conservation areas and industrial park conservation areas by redevelopment projects is hereby declared to be essential to the public interest.

In order to use the tax increment financing technique, a municipality must first establish that the proposed redevelopment project area meets the statutory criteria for designation as a "blighted area", a "conservation area" or an "industrial park conservation area". A redevelopment plan must then be prepared which describes the development or redevelopment program intended to be undertaken to reduce or eliminate those conditions which qualified the redevelopment project area as a "blighted area", "conservation area", or combination thereof, or "industrial park conservation area", and thereby enhance the tax bases of the taxing districts which extend into the redevelopment project area. The statutory requirements are set out at 65 ILCS 5/ 1 1-74.4-3, et seq.

95

4/9/2003

106135

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

The Act provides that, in order to be adopted, a Plan must meet the following conditions under 5/ 1 l-74.4-3(n):

(1) the redevelopment project area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not be reasonably anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the redevelopment plan, (2) the redevelopment plan and project conform to the comprehensive plan for the development of the municipality as a whole, or, for municipalities with a population of one hundred thousand (100,000) or more, regardless of when the redevelopment plan and project was adopted, the redevelopment plan and project either: (i) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the designated planning authority of the municipality, or (ii) includes land uses  that have been approved  by the  planning commission of the municipality, (3) the redevelopment plan establishes the estimated dates of completion of the redevelopment project and retirement of obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs  (which dates  shall not be later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in Section 8(b) of the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third (23'^d) calendar year after the year in which the ordinance approving the redevelopment project area is adopted), (4) in the case of an industrial park conservation area, also that the municipality is a labor surplus municipality and that^the implementation of the redevelopment plan will reduce unemployment, create new jobs and by the provision of new facilities enhance the tax base of the taxing districts that extend into the redevelopment project area, and (5) if any incremental revenues are being utilized under Section 8a( 1) or 8a(2) of this  Act  in  redevelopment  project  areas   approved  by  ordinance after January 1, 1986 the municipality finds (a) that the redevelopment project area would not reasonably be developed without the use of such incremental revenues, and (b) that such incremental revenues will be exclusively utilized for the development of the redevelopment project area.

Redevelopment projects are defined as any public or private development projects undertaken in furtherance of the objectives of the redevelopment plan.

The City authorized an evaluation to determine whether a portion of the City to be known as the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Area qualifies for designation as a "blighted area", pursuant to the provisions contained in the Act. If the Area so qualified, the City requested the preparation of a redevelopment plan for the Area in accordance with the requirements of the Act.

The 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area.

The Project Area is approximately one hundred eighty-three (183) acres in size and includes eight hundred twenty-two (822) contiguous parcels and public rights-of-

96

106136

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

way. Much of the Project Area is characterized by:

buildings over the age of thirty-five (35) years deleterious land-use and layout

deterioration of buildings, site improvements and rights-of-way

dilapidation of buildings

inadequate access to public rights-of-way

excessive vacancies in terms of vacant lots and vacant buildings unused railroad rights-of-way other blighting characteristics

As a result of these conditions, the Project Area is in need of redevelopment, rehabilitation and/or revitalization. In recognition of the unrealized potential of the Project Area, the City is taking action to facilitate its revitalization.

The purpose of the Plan is to create a mechanism to allow for the development of new commercial and public facilities on existing vacant and underutilized land, the redevelopment and/or expansion of existing businesses, the redevelopment of obsolete land uses, and the improvement of the area's physical environment and infrastructure. The redevelopment of the Project Area is expected to encourage economic revitalization within the community and the surrounding area.

The Project Area as a whole has not been subject to growth and development by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the Plan. The eligibility analysis, attached hereto as Appendix C, concluded that property in this area is experiencing deterioration and disinvestment. The analysis of conditions within the Project Area indicates that it is appropriate for designation as a "blighted area" in accordance with the Act.

The Plan summarizes the analyses and findings of the consultant's work, which unless otherwise noted, is solely the responsibility of Camiros, Ltd. and its subconsultants. Camiros, Ltd. has prepared this 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project and the related eligibility report with the understanding that the City would rely (i) on the findings and conclusions of the Plan and the related eligibility report in proceeding with the designation of the Project Area and the adoption and implementation of the Plan, and (ii) on the fact that Camiros, Ltd. has obtained the necessary information so that the Plan and the related eligibility report will comply with the Act.

97

4/9/2003

106137

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

The Plan has been formulated in accordance with the provisions of the Act. This document is a guide to all proposed public and private actions in the Project Area.

2.

Project Area Description.

The land to be designated as the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area") is shown in Figure 1, Boundary Map. The Project Area is approximately one hundred eighty-three ( 183) acres in size, including public rights-of-way. A legal description of the Project Area is included as Appendix B of this document. The Project Area is adjacent to the West Pullman Industrial Conservation Area. The Project Area includes only contiguous parcels and qualifies for designation as a "blighted area". The proposed Project Area includes only that area that is anticipated to be substantially benefited by the proposed redevelopment project improvements.

The general area has been the subject of two (2) planning studies in recent years. The South Halsted Street Corridor Plan, completed in 1999, establishes a broad vision for the area, which would consist of new commercial development on vacant/underutilized land as well as rehabilitated housing and new housing development. The Plan also calls for improvements to public infrastructure, aesthetic enhancements and new/upgraded public facilities. The second study was the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Area Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan, completed in May of 1998. The boundaries of that plan are essentially the same as the boundaries for this tax increment financing district. Many of the policies of the Plan, including land-use and acquisition policies, are based on aforementioned 1 19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Area designation.

Community Background.

The Project Area lies primarily within the West Pullman Community Area, although a small portion extends into the Roseland and Morgan Park Community Areas. The Project Area is adjacent to the West Pullman Industrial T.I.F. district. The community was initially settled in the 1830s but did not experience rapid growth until the later 1800s when the Illinois Central and Michigan Central Railroads were developed and industries such as the Pullman Palace Car were established. Industrial development in the general area began with the development of the West Pullman Land Association, which purchased land between Wentworth Avenue and Halsted Street from 1 15^th Street to 1 19^th Street.

98

106138

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

The first of many waves of immigrants from Europe settled in the West Pullman community in the early 1900s. After World War II, the population grew from twenty-nine thousand (29,000) in 1950, peaking at forty-five thousand (45,000) in 1980. However, in 1970 a major demographic change began to occur, and in 1990, ninety-four percent (94%) of West Pullman was African-American. West Pullman's population declined to just under forty thousand (40,000) by 1990. This decline in population was accompanied by a decline in housing units from twelve thousand two hundred eighty-one (12,28 1) in 1980 to eleven thousand nine hundred nineteen (11,919) in 1990.

After World War II, housing development boomed and reflected a style more common to suburban development. In 1990, the percent of owner-occupied housing in the West Pullman Community Area reached an all time high at seventy-two percent (72%), comparable to suburbs. The 1990 median value of OWTier-occupied homes in the West Pullman community (Fifty-nine Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Dollars ($59,270)) is generally higher than those in surrounding neighborhoods.

The 1990 median family income in West Pullman was higher than the median for the City as a whole. However, the unemployment rate for the community area has consistently been higher than the City average. The skill level of employed persons within West Pullman, however, is high with fifty-four percent (54%) being white collar workers.

Several large industries within the broader area, including International Harvester and Dutch Boy Paints, relocated their factories and operations to the suburbs. Other businesses, however, have remained in the area, including Carl Buddig and Company and other smaller manufacturing businesses. The net result of industrial relocation has been a significant loss of local jobs, especially well paying industrial sector jobs.

Current Land-Use And Zoning.

The current land-use within the Project Area consists of commercial, residential, institutional/public, industrial and mixed-use property. A large amount of vacant land is also present. Commercial use is concentrated along Halsted Street and 119^th Street. Residential use is located primarily south and east of the 1 19^th Street and Halsted Street frontages. Institutional/public uses take the form of places of worship, a public school, and a Chicago Housing Authority office and warehouse, which for the most part, are located on the main arterial streets of 119^th and Halsted Street. Industrial uses are scattered throughout the Project Area, with older uses

99

106139

4/9/2003

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

located along the former railroad line.  The current configuration of land-use is represented in Figure 3, Existing Land-Use, while the current zoning is shown in Figure 4, Existing Zoning.

Current zoning generally reflects the pattern of existing land-use. One exception is the presence of a few remnant commercial buildings along 120^th Street in spite of the R4 district zoning. Another inconsistency involves a small area on the west side of Halsted Street between 1 16^th Street and 117^th Street, which is currently used for commercial/industrial use but is zoned R3. Other relatively minor use nonconformities exist within the Project Area.

Conditions within the Project Area include a series of improvement challenges. The Project Area contains a high proportion of vacant lots and buildings. While this condition exists throughout the Project Area, the highest concentration exists along 1 19^th Street, 120^th Street and the residential property between these (2) two streets. Several decades ago, 119^th Street and 120^th Street were thriving commercial streets. As land-use and transportation characteristics changed, commercial use became unsustainable and property along these streets began to decline. The negative effects of declining commercial property affected the adjacent residential property. Combined with a prevailing building age of approximately eighty (80) years, the lack of maintenance and reinvestment resulting in a deterioration and vacancy. Today, deterioration, vacant lots and vacant buildings are widespread throughout the Project Area.

Transportation Characteristics.

Transportation facilities within the Project Area include a commuter rail and the local street system. One (1) current railroad line and one (1) former railroad line exist in the Project Area. The current railroad line is Metra's electric rail commuter service between Chicago and Blue Island. A Metra commuter station is located on Halsted Street at 12 1^st Street. This is a commuter only line and carries no freight service. Another railroad right-of-way, that of the Penn Central Railroad, was purchased by the City of Chicago Department of Transportation for the purpose of establishing a pedestrian/bike trail and open space.

Halsted Street and 119^th Street are the primary routes for north/south and east/west circulation, respectively. Halsted Street is State Route 1, and represents an important arterial street for the far south area. 1 19^th Street functions as a collector street. Circulation on local streets consists of a combination of two-way and one-way traffic. Interchanges for Interstate 94 and Interstate 57 are located outside the Project Area to the east and west, respectively.

100

106140

JOURNAL—CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Mass transportation serving the Project Area includes C.T.A. buses. Bus Number 119 runs east/west on 119^th Street, extending northward on Michigan Avenue to 95^th Street and the 95^th Street Red Line Rapid Transit Station. Bus Number 8A runs north/south along Halsted Street, providing access to the Red Line Rapid Transit Station at 79^th Street. Bus Number 8A also connects with Bus Number 8, which extends service northward from the Red Line Rapid Transit Station at 79^th Street to Waveland Avenue on the north side. In addition, Bus Number 359 provides service connecting several south suburban communities to the 12 1* Street Metra commuter station. The combination of C.T.A. and Metra service provides good transportation to the Project Area.

3.

Eligibility Of The Project Area For Designation As A Blighted Area.

The Project Area on the whole has not been 'subject to significant growth and development through investment by private enterprise. Based on the conditions present, the area is not likely to be comprehensively or effectively developed without the adoption of the Plan. In April and May of 2001, a series of studies was undertaken to establish whether the proposed Project Areais eligible for designation as a blighted area in accordance with the requirements of the Act. This analysis concluded that the Project Area so qualifies.

For improved property, the presence of (5) five of the thirteen (13) conditions set forth in the Act is required for designation of improved property as a blighted area. These factors must be meaningfully present and reasonably distributed within the area. Of the thirteen (13) factors cited in the Act for improved property, eight (8) factors are present within the Area.

The following six (6) factors were found to be present to a major extent:

Deterioration (affecting seventy-four percent (74%) of all tax blocks).

Obsolescence (affecting forty-seven percent (47%) of all tax blocks).

Presence of structures below minimum code standards (affecting ninety-five percent (95%) of all tax blocks).

101

106141

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Excessive vacancies (affecting seventy-two percent (72%) of all tax blocks).

Excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities (affecting twenty-six percent (26%) of all tax blocks).

Stagnant or declining E.A.V.

Two (2) additional factors are present to a minor extent within the Project Area. These are:

Deleterious land-use or layout (affecting twelve percent (12%) of all tax blocks).

Dilapidation (affecting nineteen percent (19%) of all tax blocks).

For vacant property, the presence of two (2) of the five (5) conditions set forth in the Act is required for designation of improved property as a blighted area. These factors must be meaningfully present and reasonably distributed within the Area. Of the five (5) factors cited in the Act. for improved property, three (3) factors are present within the Area.

Obsolete platting (affecting one hundred percent ( 100%) of the tax blocks).

Deterioration on adjacent property (affecting seventy-live percent (75%) of the tax blocks).

Stagnant or declining E.A.V.

For more detail on the basis for eligibility, refer to the study in Appendix C.

Need For Public Intervention.

The analysis of conditions within the Project Area included an evaluation of construction activity between 1996 and 2000. Table 1 summarizes construction activity within the Redevelopment Project Area by year and project type.

102

106142

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Table 1.

Building Permit Activity (1996 - 2000)

1996

1997

1999

1998

2000

Total

Construction Value New Construction Additions

Alterations/ Repairs Demolition TOTAL:

Number Of Permits Issued

New Construction Additions

Alterations/Repairs Demolition TOTAL:

1          0      $        0      $ 0

56,790      6,900      93,775

37,750      46,202      56,975

48,500      5,500      29,525

0 2 8 I

11

0 6 6 3 15

5143,040      $58,602      $180,275

0 4 6 7 17

$        0      $          0      $ 0

12,750      47,950      218,165

18,700      41,840      201,467

25,800      23,500      132,825

0 2 5 3 10

0 2 9 2 13

$57,250      $113,290      $552,457

0

16 34 16 66

Source: City of Chicago, Department of Buildings

During this five (5) year period, a total of sixty-six (66) building permits were issued for property within the Project Area.   In analyzing the building permit activity, it should be recognized that a certain level of activity occurs merely to address basic maintenance needs, which appears to account for a large majority of the construction activity. Between 1996 and 2000, no projects were undertaken in the Area that had a construction value of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or more.  Furthermore, no permits were issued for new construction. Sixteen (16) permits were issued for demolition, representing twenty-four percent (24%) of the permits and twenty-four percent (24%) of the total construction value

103

4/9/2003

106143

REPORTS   OF COMMITTEES

over the five (5) year period. Thirty-four (34) permits were issued for alterations and repairs, while six (6) permits were issued for additions.

The Five Hundred Fifty-two Thousand Four Hundred Fifty-seven Dollars ($552,457) in construction spending that has occurred in the Project Area over the past five (5) years represents a minimal level of investment. This five (5) year private sector investment is roughly equal to the development value of one (1) full service restaurant. Alternatively, this level of investment is approximately equal to three (3), one thousand eight hundred ( 1,800) square foot new houses. Given the large amount of vacant land present within the Project Area, and the presence of widespread deterioration, a significantly higher level of private investment is required to reverse the area's decline. Clearly, the lack of development is not being resolved through private-sector investment, and a continuation of this minimal level of private investment may exacerbate blight within the Project Area.

Despite the lack of private sector investment, equalized assessed value (E.A.V.) within the Area grew from approximately Fifteen Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($15,800,000) in 1996 to Eighteen Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($18,700,000) in 2000. However, for this period, the E.A.V. of the Area.grew at a -slower rate (seventeen and seven-tenths percent (17.7%)) than that of the City . (thirty-three and one-tenths percent (33.1%)). This growth in E.A.V. could be the result of one (1) or more of several factors, including improvements to a small number of properties or normal growth due to inflation. However, the increase in E.A.V. is not the result of widespread reinvestment in private property through construction activity. Given the blight and obsolescence that has been documented, the overall redevelopment of the Project Area would not reasonably be expected to occur without public intervention and the adoption of the Plan.

4.

Redevelopment Plan  Goals And Objectives.

The proposed Plan and Project is consistent with City plans for the area. The land uses conform to those approved by the Chicago Planning Commission and to recent City-sponsored plans for the area. The following goals and objectives are provided to guide development in the Project Area.

General Goals:

Reduce or eliminate deleterious conditions within the Project Area.

104

106144

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Provide for the orderly transition from obsolete land uses, to more appropriate land-use patterns.

Create an attractive environment that encourages new commercial development.

Increase affordable housing (for-sale and rental), including market rate housing set aside (twenty percent (20%)).

Employ residents within and surrounding the Project Area in jobs generated by area development.

Improve public facilities and amenities.

Enhance the tax base of the Project Area.

Redevelopment Objectives:

Encourage private investment. .

Direct development activities to appropriate locations within the Project Area in accordance with the land-use plan and general land-use strategies.

Encourage rezoning of obsolete land-use designations to facilitate development of underutilized property for uses that have demonstrated market support.

Provide opportunities for business and commercial development where there is demonstrated market support.

Encourage development of affordable for-sale and rental housing, as defined by the City's Department of Housing, for persons earning no more than one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the area median income and persons earning no more than eighty percent (80%) of area median income, respectively.

Encourage development of market-rate housing as part of an overall program to create a mixed-income neighborhood.

Realign segments of the proposed bikeway/open space on the former railroad right-of-way to improve access to private property and to create more viable redevelopment parcels.

105

4/9/2003

106145

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Establish job readiness and job training programs to provide residents within and surrounding the Project Area with the skills necessary to secure jobs in the Project Area and in adjacent redevelopment project areas.

Promote hiring of local residents, including graduates of the Project Area's job readiness and job training programs.

Improve recreational amenities within the Project Area.

Design Objectives:

Provide off-street parking to support existing and new commercial uses within the 119^th and Halsted Business District.

Establish design standards for commercial and residential redevelopment to ensure compatible high-quality development.

Enhance the appearance and function of existing commuter rail public transit facility.

Encourage increased use of public transit facilities through pedestrian-friendly design, while also improving vehicular movement.

5.

Redevelopment Plan.

The City proposes to achieve the Plan's goals through the use of public financing techniques, including tax increment financing, and by undertaking some or all of the following actions:

Property Assembly,  Site  Preparation And  Environmental Remediation.

To meet the goals and objectives of the Plan, the City may acquire and assemble property throughout the Area. Land assemblage by the City may be by purchase, exchange, donation, lease, eminent domain or through the Tax Reactivation Program and may be for the purpose of (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers, or (b) sale, lease, conveyance or dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Furthermore, the City may require written redevelopment agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As

106

106146

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

appropriate, the City may devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and development.

Figure 7, Land Acquisition Overview Map (Appendix A), reflects the properties proposed for acquisition on the existing acquisition map from the 1 19^th and Halsted Street Redevelopment Area Designation, adopted in 1998. Table 2, Land Acquisition by Parcel Identification Number and Address (see Appendix A), provides a list of the properties proposed for acquisition on this underlying acquisition map. There is no new acquisition of property proposed as part of the Plan.

In connection with the City exercising its power to acquire real property not currently on the Land Acquisition Overview Map, including the exercise of the power of eminent domain, under the Act in implementing the Plan, the City will follow its customary procedures of having each such acquisition recommended by the Community Development Commission (or any successor commission) and authorized by the City Council of the City. Acquisition of such real property as may be authorized by the City Council does not constitute a change in the nature of the Plan. The acquisition of such property can be paid for using T.I.F. funds.

For properties described in Figure 7 (the Land Acquisition Overview Map) in Appendix A, the acquisition of occupied properties by the City shall, commence within four (4) years from the date of the publication of the ordinance approving the underlying plan (September 9, 1998). Acquisition shall be deemed to have commenced with the sending of an offer letter. After the expiration of this four (4) year period, the City may acquire such property pursuant to the Plan under the Act according to its customary procedures as described in the preceding paragraph.

Intergovernmental  And  Redevelopment Agreements.

The City may enter into redevelopment agreements or intergovernmental agreements with private entities or public entities to construct, rehabilitate, renovate or restore private or public improvements on one or several parcels (collectively referred to as "Redevelopment Projects"). Such redevelopment agreements may be needed to support the rehabilitation or construction of allowable private improvements, in accordance with the Plan; incur costs or reimburse developers for other eligible redevelopment project costs as provided in the Act in implementing the Plan; and provide public improvements and facilities which may include, but are not limited to utilities, street closures, transit improvements, streetscape enhancements, signalization, parking and surface right-of-way improvements.

Terms of redevelopment as part of this redevelopment project may be incorporated in appropriate redevelopment agreements. For example, the City

107

4/9/2003

106147

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

may agree to reimburse a developer for incurring certain eligible redevelopment project costs under the Act. Such agreements may contain specific development controls as allowed by the Act.

The City requires that developers who receive T.I.F. assistance for market rate housing set aside twenty percent (20%) of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Housing. Generally, this means the affordable for-sale units should be priced at a level that is affordable to persons earning no more than one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the area median income, and affordable rental units should be affordable to persons earning no more than eighty percent (80%) of the area median income.

Job Training.

To the extent allowable under the Act, job training costs may be directed toward training activities designed to enhance the competitive advantages of the Project Area and to attract additional employers to the Area. Working with employers and local community organizations, job training and job readiness programs may be provided that meet employers' hiring needs, as allowed under the Act.

A job readiness/training program is a component of the Plan. The City expects to encourage hiring from the community that maximizes job opportunities for Chicago residents.

Relocation.

Relocation assistance may be provided to facilitate redevelopment of portions of the Area, and to meet other City objectives.  Businesses or households legally occupying properties to be acquired by the City may be provided with relocation advisory and financial assistance as determined by the City.

Analysis,  Professional Services And Administrative Activities.

The City may undertake or engage professional consultants, engineers, architects, attorneys and others to conduct various analyses, studies, administrative or legal services to establish, implement and manage the Plan.

Provision Of Public Improvements And Facilities.

Adequate public improvements and facilities may be provided to service the Area. Public improvements and facilities may include, but are not limited to, street closures   to   facilitate   assembly   of  development   sites,   upgrading streets,

108

106148

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

signalization improvements, provision of streetscape amenities, river-walk improvements, parking improvements and utility improvements.

Financing Costs Pursuant To The Act.

Interest on any obligations issued under the Act accruing during the estimated period of construction of the redevelopment project and other financing costs may be paid from the incremental tax revenues pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

Interest Costs Pursuant To The Act.

Pursuant to the Act, the City may allocate a portion of the incremental tax revenues to pay or reimburse developers for interest costs incurred in connection with redevelopment activities in order to enhance the redevelopment potential of the Area.

6.

Redevelopment  Project Description.

The Plan seeks to create a strong, active and diverse business district along Halsted Street and to create an attractive and viable residential neighborhood in the area south and east of the 119^th/Halsted intersection. Physical improvements to the Project Area are seen as a critical component of its overall improvement.

The Plan recognizes that new investment in commercial and residential property is needed to achieve revitalization. In certain cases, attracting new private investment may require the redevelopment of existing properties. Proposals for infrastructure improvements will stress projects that will serve and benefit the surrounding residential, commercial and institutional uses. A comprehensive program of aesthetic enhancements will include streetscape improvements, facade renovations and aesthetically compatible new development. The components will create the quality environment required to sustain the revitalization of the Project Area.

Based on this assessment,  the goals of the redevelopment projects  to be undertaken in the Project Area are to:   1) foster viable commercial redevelopment on vacant, deteriorated or obsolete property that can serve the far south side community; 2) redevelop obsolete commercial property along 1 19^th and 120^th Streets for residential use; 3) redevelop vacant and deteriorated residential property to

109

4/9/2003

106149

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

remove blighting influences and create a sustainable neighborhood; and 4) integrate public investments in infrastructure and facilities  to  help foster a suitable environment  for  private-sector investments.   The major physical improvement elements anticipated as a result of implementing the proposed Plan are outlined below.

Commercial Redevelopment.

The Plan recognizes that commercial redevelopment is a key element of area improvement. The Plan seeks to focus commercial development along Halsted Street, with more intensive development at the major intersections of 1 lS^/Halsted and 1 ^^/Halsted. Smaller-scale commercial and mixed-use (commercial/ residential) development is envisioned south of the 1 lQ^/Halsted intersection.

Residential Redevelopment.

Residential  redevelopment  is  proposed  for  the  deteriorated  and obsolete commercial property along 119^th and 120^th Streets. Townhouse units or two (2) flats/three (3) flats are seen as appropriate housing types for this redevelopment. Single-family residential is most suitable for in-fill development along local side streets.

Public Improvements.

Improvements to public infrastructure and facilities are needed to complement and attract private sector investment.  Infrastructure improvements may include:

Improvement of the former railroad right-of-way as a bikeway and open space amenity.

Improvement of streetscape conditions along Halsted Street to support commercial redevelopment.

Improvement of street intersections to improve traffic flow. Expansion of the parking supply.

Enhancement of streetscape conditions along 119^th and 120^th Streets to support residential redevelopment.

110

106150

4/9/2003

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

Construction of a new public library at the corner of 1 19 and Halsted Streets.

Improvement of other public facilities that meet the needs of the community.

7.

General Land-Use Plan And Map.

The land uses proposed in the Area are generally consistent with current zoning. One significant exception is the land along 1 19^th Street east of Halsted Street. Land in this location is currently zoned B2- 1 and is proposed for largely residential use. All proposed land-use is subject to the approval of the Chicago Plan Commission. Figure 6, General Land-Use Plan, in Appendix A, identifies land uses expected to result from implementation of the Plan in the Area. The land-use categories planned for the Area are: 1) residential, 2) commercial/mixed-use, 3) public/ institutional, and 4) park/open space use. The commercial/mixed-use category includes commercial use, residential use or commercial and residential uses within the same building. Institutional uses and park/open space amenities may be incorporated into any of these land-use categories as needs and opportunities present themselves. The General Land-Use Plan is intended to provide a guide for future land-use improvements and developments within the Area.

The General Land-Use Plan is intended to serve as a broad guide for land-use and redevelopment policy. The plan is general in nature to allow adequate flexibility to respond to shifts in the market and private investment. A more specific discussion of the proposed uses within the Project Area is outlined below.

Residential Use.

Residential use is proposed south and east of the 1 ^^/Halsted intersection. Most of the property along 1 19^th Street east of Emerald Avenue is proposed for residential use. This represents a shift in land-use policy from its current zoning, which is B2- 1. This area is no longer viable as a commercial district and should be redeveloped for residential use. The treatment of 1 19^th Street is similar to that of 120^th Street, which was a viable commercial district many years ago, but is now zoned residential. Other areas shown for residential use reflect existing residential property or vacant property that should be redeveloped for residential use.

111

4/9/2003

106151

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Commercial / Mixed-Use.

Commercial/mixed-use development is proposed for the Halsted Street corridor and for scattered properties on 1 19^th Street and 115^th Street. Commercial and retail development is envisioned for most of this area. However, allowing residential use provides needed flexibility, especially for property where a clear trend of future use is not evident. Important recommendations include the redevelopment of the current C.H.A. office and warehouse facility on 115^th Street and relocation of a small number of older industrial uses needed to facilitate broader commercial redevelopment of land, particularly along Halsted Street.

Public / Institutional.

Property designated as public/institutional use represents primarily existing uses. Prominent uses include the West Pullman Elementary School at 120^th Street and Parnell Avenue and the City of Chicago fire station at 119^th Street and Peoria Street. A number of churches are also present within the area. The most significant proposed use is a new public library at the northwest corner of 119^th and Halsted Streets.

Park/ Open Space.

The most prominent park/open space use is the proposed bikeway on the former railroad right-of-way running northwest to southeast through the Project Area. The alignment of this bikeway, as shown on the General Land-Use Plan, reflects proposals to realign segments of the bikeway to improve access to private property and promote more effective redevelopment. Such recommendations have been discussed with City officials and will be considered where feasible. Another proposed park/open space facility is the vacant, wooded property located along the proposed bikeway between 114^th Street and 1 12^th Street.

These land-use strategies are intended to direct development toward the most appropriate land-use pattern for the various portions of the Project Area and enhance the overall development of the Area in accordance with the goals and objectives of the Plan. Locations of specific uses, or public infrastructure improvements, may vary from the General Land-Use Plan as a result of more detailed planning and site design activities. Such variations are permitted without amendment to the Plan as long as they are consistent with the Plan's goals and objectives and the land uses and zoning approved by the Chicago Plan Commission.

112

i

106152

4/9/2003

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

8.

Redevelopment Plan Financing.

Tax increment financing is an economic development tool designed to facilitate the redevelopment of blighted areas and to arrest decline in areas that may become blighted without public intervention. It is expected that tax increment financing will be an important means, although not necessarily the only means, of financing improvements and providing development incentives in the Project Area throughout its twenty-three (23) year life.

Tax increment financing can only be used when private investment would not reasonably be expected to occur without public assistance. The Act sets forth the range of public assistance that may be provided.

It is anticipated that expenditures for redevelopment project costs will be carefully staged in a reasonable and proportional basis to coincide with expenditures for redevelopment by private developers and the projected availability of tax increment revenues.

Eligible Project Costs.

Redevelopment project costs include the sum total of all reasonable, or necessary, costs incurred, or estimated to be incurred, and any such costs incidental to the Plan. Some of the costs listed below became eligible costs under the Act pursuant to an amendment to the Act which became effective November 1, 1999. Eligible costs may include, without limitation, the following:

1. Professional services including: costs of studies and surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and administration of the Plan including, but not limited to, staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other services, provided however, that no charges for professional services may be based on a percentage of the tax increment collected and the terms of such contracts do not extend beyond a period of three (3) years. Redevelopment project costs may not include general overhead or administrative costs of the City that would still have been incurred if the City had not designated a redevelopment project area or approved a redevelopment plan.
2. The cost of marketing sites within the Area to prospective businesses, developers and investors.

113

4/9/2003

106153

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

2. Property assembly costs, including, but not limited to, acquisition of land and other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of buildings, site preparation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground level or below ground environmental contamination, including, but not limited to parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, and the clearing and grading of land.
3. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings, fixtures and leasehold improvements; and the cost of replacing an existing public building, if pursuant to the implementation of a redevelopment project, the existing public building is to be demolished to use the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private investment.
4. Costs of the construction of public works or improvements, but not including the cost of constructing a new municipal public building principally used to provide offices, storage space, or conference facilities or vehicle storage,, maintenance, or repair for administrative, public safety, or public works personnel and that is not intended to replace an existing public building unless the City makes a reasonable determination, supported by information that provides the basis for that determination, that the new municipal building is required to meet an increase in the need for public safety purposes anticipated to result from the implementation of the Plan.
5. Costs of job training and retraining projects including the cost of "welfare-to-work" programs implemented by businesses located within the Area, advanced vocational education or career education, including but not limited to courses in occupational, semi-technical or technical fields leading directly to employment, incurred by one (1) or more taxing districts as provided in the Act.
6. Financing costs, including, but not limited to, all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and, which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued under the Act, including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and not exceeding thirty-six (36) months thereafter and including reasonable reserves related thereto.

8.      All, or a portion, of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from the Redevelopment  Project  necessarily  incurred,  or  to  be  incurred, in furtherance of the Plan, to the extent the City, by written agreement, accepts and approves such costs.

114

106154

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

9. An elementary, secondary or unit school district's increased costs attributable to assisted housing units will be reimbursed as provided for in the Act.

1. Relocation costs, to the extent that the City determines that relocation costs shall be paid or is required to make payment of relocation costs by state or federal law or in accordance with the requirements of the Act.
2. Payment in lieu of taxes.
3. Interest costs incurred by a developer related to the construction, renovation or rehabilitation of a redevelopment project provided that:

such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation fund established pursuant to the Act;

such payments in any one (1) year may not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the annual interest costs incurred by the developer with regard to the redevelopment project during that year;

• . —       if there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax

• r      allocation fund to make the payment pursuant to this provision,

then the amounts so due shall accrue and be payable when sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund;

the total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total: (i) cost paid or incurred by the developer for such redevelopment project, plus (ii) redevelopment project costs excluding any property assembly costs and any relocation costs incurred by the City pursuant to the Act; and

up to seventy-five percent (75%) of the interest cost incurred by a developer for the financing of rehabilitated or new housing units for low-income households and very low-income households, as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act.

1. Up to fifty percent (50%) of the cost of construction, renovation and/or rehabilitation of all low-income and very low-income housing units (for ownership or rental) as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. If the units are part of a residential redevelopment project that includes units not affordable to low-income and very low-income households, only the low-income and very low-income households shall be eligible for benefits under the Act.

115

106155

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

2. Up to seventy-five percent (75%) of the interest incurred by a developer for the financing of rehabilitated or new housing units for low-income households and very low-income households, as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act.

15.      The cost of day care services for children of employees from low-income families working for businesses located within the Area and all or a portion of the cost of operation of day care centers established by Area businesses to serve employees from low-income families working in businesses located in the Area. For the purposes of this paragraph, "low-income families" means families whose annual income does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the City, county or regional median income as determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The cost of constructing new privately-owned buildings is not an eligible redevelopment project cost, unless specifically authorized by the Act.

Estimated Project Costs.

A range of activities and improvements may be required to implement the Plan. The proposed eligible activities and their estimated costs over the life of the Area are briefly described below and also shown in Table 3, Estimated Redevelopment Project costs.

1. Professional services including planning, legal, surveys, real estate marketing costs, fees and other related development costs. This budget element provides for studies and survey costs for planning and implementation of the project, including planning and legal fees, architectural and engineering, development site marketing, financial and special service costs. (Estimated cost: One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000))
2. Property assembly costs, including acquisition of land and other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, and other appropriate and eligible costs needed to prepare the property for redevelopment. These costs may include the reimbursement of acquisition costs incurred by private developers. Land acquisition may include acquisition of both improved and vacant property in order to create development sites, accommodate public rights-of-way or to provide other public facilities needed to achieve the goals and objectives of the Plan. Property assembly costs also include: demolition of existing improvements, including clearance of blighted properties or clearance required to prepare sites for new   development,   site   preparation,   including   grading,   and other

116

106156

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

appropriate and eligible site activities needed to facilitate new construction, and environmental remediation costs associated with property assembly which are required to render the property suitable for redevelopment. (Estimated cost: Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000))

1. Rehabilitation, reconstruction, repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings and fixtures; and up to fifty percent (50%) of the cost of construction of low-income and very low-income housing units. (Estimated cost: Three Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($3,250,000))
2. Construction of public improvements, infrastructure and facilities. These improvements are intended to improve access within the Area, stimulate private investment and address other identified public improvement needs, and may include all or a portion of a taxing district's eligible costs, including increased costs of the Chicago Public Schools attributable to assisted housing units within the Area in accordance with the requirements of the Act. (Estimated cost: Twelve Million Dollars ($12,000,000)]
3. Costs of job training and retraining projects, advanced vocational education or career education, as provided for in the Act. (Estimated cost: One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000))

l

1. Relocation costs, as judged by the City to be appropriate or required to further implementation of the Plan. (Estimated cost: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000))
2. Financing and interest costs associated with redevelopment projects, pursuant to the provisions of the Act. (Estimated cost: Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000))
3. Provision of day care services as provided in the Act. (Estimated cost: Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000))
4. All or part of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from or incurred in furtherance of the Plan, to the extent that the City, by written agreement accepts and approves such costs. (Estimated cost: Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,500,000))

The estimated gross eligible project cost over the life of the Area is Thirty-five Million Dollars ($35,000,000). All project cost estimates are in 2001 dollars. Any bonds issued to finance portions of the redevelopment project may include an amount of proceeds sufficient to pay customary and reasonable charges associated with issuance of such obligations, as well as to provide for capitalized interest and reasonably required reserves. The total project cost figure excludes any costs for the issuance of bonds.   Adjustments to estimated line items, which are upper

117

4/9/2003

106157

REPORTS   OF COMMITTEES

estimates for these costs, are expected and may be made without amendment to the Plan.

Table 2.

Estimated   Redevelopment  Project Costs.

Program  Action/Improvement Budget

Planning, Legal, Surveys, Redevelopment      $ 1,500,000

Marketing Costs and Related Development Costs

Property Assembly, Site Preparation and 10,000,000 Environmental Remediation

Rehabilitation (may include up to fifty 3,250,000 percent (50%) of the cost of construction of low- and very low-income housing units)

Public Improvements 12,000,000^u'

Job Training and Retraining      1 ,000,000

Relocation      1 ,000,000

Financing and Interest Costs 3,500,000

(1) This category may also include reimbursing capital costs of taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the Area and school district costs pursuant to the Act. As permitted by the Act, the City may pay, or reimburse all, or a portion of a taxing district's costs resulting from the Redevelopment Project pursuant to a written agreement by the City accepting and approving such costs.

118

106158

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Budget

Program   Action/Improvement

Day Care

$ 250,000

2,500,000

Taxing District Capital Costs

TOTAL:

$35,000,000^,2,(31

Sources Of Funds.

Funds necessary to pay for redevelopment project costs and municipal obligations, which have been issued to pay for such costs, are to be derived principally from tax increment revenues and proceeds from municipal obligations, which have as their source of payment tax increment revenue. To secure the issuance of these obligations, the City may permit the utilization of guarantees, deposits and other forms of security made available by private sector developers.

The tax increment revenue, which will be used to fund tax increment obligations and redevelopment project costs, shall be the incremental real property taxes Incremental real property tax revenue is attributable to the increase in the current equalized assessed value of each taxable lot, block, tract or parcel of real property in the Area over and above the initial equalized assessed value of each such property in the Area.   Other sources of funds, which may be used to pay for redevelopment costs and obligations issued, the proceeds of which are used to pay for such costs, are land disposition proceeds, state and federal grants, investment income, and such other sources of funds and revenues as the City may, from time to time, deem appropriate. The City may incur Project Costs (costs for line items listed on Table 2), which are paid for from funds of the City other than incremental taxes, and the City may then be reimbursed for such costs from incremental taxes.

1. The Total Project Costs exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense,

capitalized interest and costs associated with optional redemptions. These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total Project Costs. The amount of the Total Project Costs that can be incurred in the Area will be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated from the Area only by a public right-of-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in the Area, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in the Area which are paid from incremental taxes generated from contiguous redevelopment project areas.

1. The Total Project Costs provides an upper limit on expenditures and adjustments may be made in line items without amendment to the Plan.

119

4/9/2003

106159

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

The Project Area may be contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, other redevelopment project areas created under the Act. The City may utilize net incremental property taxes received from the Area to pay eligible project costs, or obligations issued to pay such costs, in other contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, and vice versa. The amount of revenue from the Project Area, made available to support such contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs within the Project Area, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in the Plan.

The Project Area may become contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, redevelopment project areas created under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law (65 ILCS 5/ 1 1-74.61- 1, et seq.).   If the City finds that the goals, objectives and financial success of such contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, are interdependent with those of the Project Area, the City may determine that it is in the best interests of the City, and in furtherance of the purposes of the Plan, that net revenues from the Project Area be made available to support any such redevelopment project areas and vice versa. The City therefore proposes to utilize net incremental revenues received from the Project Area to pay eligible redevelopment project costs (which are eligible under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law referred to above) in any such areas, and vice versa. Such revenues may be transferred or loaned between the Project Area and such areas. The amount of revenue from the Project Area made available, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs within the Project Area, or other areas described in the preceding paragraph, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in Table 3.

Development of the Project Area would not be reasonably expected to occur without the use of the incremental revenues provided by the Act. Redevelopment project costs include those eligible project costs set forth in the Act. Tax increment financing or other public sources will be used only to the extent needed to secure commitments for private redevelopment activity.

Nature And Term Of Obligations To Be Issued.

The City may issue obligations secured by the tax increment special tax allocation fund established for the Area pursuant to the Act or such other funds or security as are available to the City by virtue of its powers, available under the Act, pursuant to the Illinois State Constitution.

All obligations issued by the City in order to implement the Plan shall be retired not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in Section 8(b) of the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third (23^rd) calendar year after the year in which

120

i

106160

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

the ordinance approving the redevelopment project area is adopted. The final maturity date of any such obligations which are issued may not be later than twenty (20) years from their respective dates of issuance. One (1) or more series of obligations may be sold at one (1) or more times in order to implement the Plan. The City may also issue obligations to a developer as reimbursement for project costs incurred by the developer on behalf of the City.

Revenues shall be used for the scheduled and/or early retirement of obligations, and for reserves, bond sinking funds and redevelopment project costs, and, to the extent that the real property tax increment is not used for such purposes, shall be declared surplus and shall then become available for distribution annually to taxing districts in the Area in the manner provided by the Act.

Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation.

The purpose of identifying the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("E.A.V.") of the Project Area is to provide an estimate of the initial E.A.V., which the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental E.A.V. and incremental property taxes of the Project Area. The 2000 E.A.V. of all taxable parcels in the Area is Eighteen Million Six Hundred Eighty-nine Thousand Thirty-four Dollars ($18,689,034)-. This total E.A.V. amount by Permanent Index Number is summarized in Appendix D. The E.A.V. is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk, and shall become the Certified Initial E.A.V. from which all incremental property taxes in the Area will be calculated by Cook County.

Anticipated  Equalized  Assessed Valuation.

Once the redevelopment project has been completed and the property is fully assessed, the E.A.V. of real property within the Area is estimated at Twenty-eight Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($28,700,000). This estimate has been calculated assuming that the Project Area will be developed in accordance with Figure 6, General Land-Use Plan, of the Plan.

The estimated E.A.V. assumes that the assessed value of property within the Project Area will increase substantially as a result of new development and public improvements.

Calculation of the estimated E.A.V. is based on several assumptions, including: 1) redevelopment of the Project Area will occur in a timely manner; 2) the application of a State Multiplier of 2.139 1 to the projected assessed value of property within the Redevelopment Project Area; and 3) an annual inflation factor of two percent (2%). The projected State Multiplier was calculated by averaging the

121

106161

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

State Multipliers for Cook County for the most recent nine (9) year period (199 1 — 1999).

Financial Impact On Taxing Districts.

The Act requires an assessment of any financial impact of the Area on, or any increased demand for services from, any taxing district affected by the Plan and a description of any program to address such financial impacts or increased demand. The City intends to monitor development in the Area and with the cooperation of the other affected taxing districts will attempt to ensure that any increased needs are addressed in connection with any particular development.

The following taxing districts presently levy taxes on properties located within the Area:

Cook County. The County has principal responsibility for the protection of persons and property, the provision of public health services and the maintenance of County highways.

Cook County   Forest Preserve District. The Forest Preserve District is responsible for acquisition, restoration and management of lands for the purpose of protecting and preserving open space in the City and County for the education, pleasure and recreation of the public.

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Of Greater Chicago. The Water Reclamation District provides the main trunk lines for the collection of wastewater from cities, villages and towns, and for the treatment and disposal thereof.

Chicago Community College District 508. The Community College District is a unit of the State of Illinois' system of public community colleges, whose objective is to meet the educational needs of residents of the City and other students seeking higher education programs and services.

Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago. General responsibilities of the Board of Education include the provision, maintenance and operations of educational facilities and the provision of educational services for kindergarten through twelfth (12^th) grade.

Chicago Park District. The Park District is responsible for the provision, maintenance and operation of park and recreational facilities throughout the City and for the provision of recreation programs.

Chicago School Finance Authority. The Authority was created in 1980 to exercise oversight and control over the financial affairs of the Board of Education of the City of Chicago.

122

106162

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

City Of Chicago. The City is responsible for the provision of a wide range of municipal services, including: police and fire protection; capital improvements and maintenance; water supply and distribution; sanitation service; building, housing and zoning codes, et cetera. The City also administers the City of Chicago Library Fund, formerly a separate taxing district from the City.

The proposed revitalization of the Project Area would be expected to create moderate demands on public services. The development of new residential property on vacant and deteriorated land would increase the demand for school services as well as parks and other population-based services. The demand for water and sewer services would increase as well. Proposed commercial development would not increase the demand for population-based services, but would increase demand for water and sewer services and similar types of infrastructure, including the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District.

Redevelopment of the Area may result in changes to the level of required public services. The required level of these public services will depend upon the uses that are ultimately included within the Project Area. Although the specific nature and timing of the private investment expected to be attracted to the Project Area cannot be precisely quantified at this time, a general assessment of financial impact can be made based upon the level of development and timing anticipated by the proposed Plan.

When completed, developments in the Project Area will generate property tax revenues for all taxing districts. Other revenues may also accrue to the City in the form of sales tax, business fees and licenses, and utility user fees. The costs of some services such as water and sewer service, building inspections, et cetera are typically covered by user charges. However, others are not and should be subtracted from the estimate of properly tax revenues to assess the net financial impact of the Plan on the affected taxing districts.

For the taxing districts levying taxes on property within the Area, increased service demands are expected to be negligible because they are already serving the Area. Upon completion of the Plan, all taxing districts are expected to share the benefits of a substantially improved tax base. However, prior to the completion of the Plan, certain taxing districts may experience an increased demand for services.

It is expected that most of the increases in demand for the services and programs of the aforementioned taxing districts, associated with the Project Area, can be adequately handled by the existing services and programs maintained by these taxing districts. However, Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) has been allocated within the Project Budget to "taxing district capital costs" to address potential demands associated with implementing the Plan.

123

4/9/2003

106163

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Real estate tax revenues resulting from increases in the E.A.V., over and above the certified initial E.A.V. established with the adoption of the Plan, will be used to pay eligible redevelopment costs in the Project Area. Following termination of the Project Area, the real estate tax revenues, attributable to the increase in the E.A.V. over the certified initial E.A.V., will be distributed to all taxing districts levying taxes against property located in the Area. Successful implementation of the Plan is expected to result in new development and private investment on a scale sufficient to overcome blighted conditions and substantially improve the long-term economic value of the Project Area.

Completion Of The Redevelopment Project And Retirement Of Obligations To Finance  Redevelopment  Project Costs.

The Plan will be completed, and all obligations issued to finance redevelopment costs shall be retired, no later than December 3 1^st of the year in which the payment to the City treasurer as provided in the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third (23^rd) calendar year following the year in which the ordinance approving the Plan is adopted (by December 3 1, 2024).

9.

Housing Impact Study.

A Housing Impact Study has been conducted for the Redevelopment Project Area (Project Area) to determine the potential impact of redevelopment on area residents. As set forth in the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (the "Act"), if the redevelopment plan for a redevelopment plan project area would result in the displacement of residents from ten (10) or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains seventy-five (75) or more inhabited residential units and the City is unable to certify that no displacement of residents will occur, the municipality shall prepare a housing impact study and incorporate the study in the separate feasibility report required by the subsection (a) of Section 1 1-74.4-5 (sic) [Section 1 1-74.4-4.1]. Since the Project Area contains more than seventy-five (75) inhabited residential units and may displace ten (10) or more residents, a housing impact study is required. This Housing Impact Study, which is part of the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project, fulfills this requirement. It is also integral to the formulation of the goals, objectives, and policies of the Plan.

This Housing Impact Study is organized into two (2) parts. Part I describes the housing survey conducted within the Project Area to determine existing housing characteristics. Part II describes the potential impact of the Plan. Specific elements

124

106164

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

of the Housing Impact Study include:

Part I — Housing Survey.

Type of residential unit, either single-family or multi-family.

The number and type of rooms within the units, if that information is available.

Whether the units are inhabited or uninhabited, as determined not less than forty-five (45) days before the date that the ordinance or resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 1 1-74.4-5 of the Act is passed.

Data as to the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units, which shall be deemed to be fully satisfied if based on data from the most recent federal census.

Part II — Potential Housing Impact.

The number and location of those units that will be or may be removed.

The municipality's plans for relocating assistance for those residents in the proposed redevelopment project area whose residences are to be removed.

The availability of replacement housing for those residents whose residences are to be removed, and the identification of the type, location, and cost of the replacement housing.

The type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided.

Part I — Housing Survey.

Part I of this study provides the type, size, and number of residential units within the Project Area, the number of inhabited and uninhabited units, and the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units.

Number And Type Of Residential Units.

The number and type of residential buildings in the area were identified during the building condition and land-use survey conducted as part of the eligibility analysis for the area. This survey, completed on May 24, 2001, revealed that the Project Area contains two hundred forty-seven (247) residential or mixed-use

125

4/9/2003

106165

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

residential buildings containing a total of four hundred (400) units. The number of residential units by building type is outlined in Table 3, Number and Type of Residential Units.

Table 3.

Number And Type Of Residential Units.

Total  Number      Total Number

Building Type      Of Buildings      Of Units

Single-family      143      143

Two-Flat      52      104

Three-Flat      5      15

Multi-Family

(4 or more units)      7      36

Mixed-Use (Residential

Above)      3 8      74

Rooming Houses      2      28

TOTAL:      400

Number And Type Of Rooms Within Units.

The distribution within the Project Area of the four hundred (400) residential units by number of rooms and by number of bedrooms is identified in tables within this section. The methodology to determine this information is described below.

Methodology.

In order to describe the distribution of residential units by number and type of rooms within the Project Area, Camiros, Ltd. analyzed 1990 United States Census data by Block Groups for those Block Groups encompassed by the Redevelopment Project Area. A Block Group, as defined by the United States Census, is a combination of census blocks (a census block is the smallest entity for which the Census Bureau collects and tabulates one hundred percent (100%) data). The Block Group is the lowest level of geography for which the Census Bureau tabulates

126

106166

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

sample, or long-form, data. In this study, we have relied on 1990 federal census sample data because it is the best available information regarding the housing units and residents of the Redevelopment Project Area. The Block Group data available for the Project Area are based on a sampling of residential units. Based on this data, a proportional projection was made of the number of bedrooms in each unit and the distribution of units by the number of rooms within each unit. The results of this survey are outlined in Table 4, Units By Bedroom Type, and in Table 5, Units By Number of Rooms.

Table 4. Units By Bedroom Type.^,,)

Number Of Bedrooms

Percentage (1990 Census)

Current Estimated For Project Area

Studio

1. Bedroom
2. Bedrooms
3. Bedrooms
4. Bedrooms
5. + Bedrooms Rooming Houses

TOTAL:

1.6 5.3 33.5 42.3 12.0 5.3 0.0 100.0

6 20 124 157 45 20 28 400

(1)  As defined by the Census Bureau, number of bedrooms includes all rooms intended for use as bedrooms even if they are currently used for some other purpose. A housing unit consisting of only one (1) room, such as a one (1) room efficiency apartment, is classified, by definition, as having no bedroom.

127

4/9/2003

106167

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Table 5. Units By Number Of Rooms.¹²¹

Number Of Rooms

Percentage 1990 Census)

Current Estimate For Project Area

2. Room
3. Rooms
4. Rooms
5. Rooms
6. Rooms
7. Rooms
8. Rooms

8      Rooms 9+ Rooms Rooming Houses

TOTAL:

0.8 1.1 4.5 12.5 33.4 27.1 7.6 7.8 5.2 0.0 100.0

3 4 17 46 124 101 29 29 19 28 400

(2) As defined by the Census Bureau, for each unit, rooms include living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, enclosed porches suitable for year-round use, and lodger's rooms. Excluded are strip or Pullman kitchens, bathrooms, open porches, balconies, halls or foyers, half-rooms, utility rooms, unfinished attics or basements or other unfinished space used for storage. A partially divided room is a separate room only if there is a partition from floor to ceiling,  but not if the partition  consists  solely of shelves  or cabinets.

128

106168

4/9/2003

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

Number  Of Inhabited Units.

A survey of inhabited dwelling units within the Project Area was conducted by Camiros, Ltd. and completed on May 24,200 1. This survey identified four hundred (400) inhabited residential units, of which thirty-five (35) (nine and four-tenths percent (9.4 %)) were identified as vacant. Therefore, there are approximately three hundred sixty-five (365) total inhabited units within the Project Area. As required by the Act, this information was ascertained as of May 24,200 1, which is a date not less than forty-five (45) days prior to the date that the resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 1 1-74.4-5 of the Act is or will be passed (the resolution setting the public hearing and Joint Review Board meeting dates).

Race And Ethnicity Of Residents.

As required by the Act, the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units was determined. Population projections from Claritas Inc., a national demographic data provider, were used to compile the information on race and ethnicity of residents. These projections were based on data from the 1990 United States Census; detailed information from the 2000 Census on the racial and ethnic composition of residents within the Project Area has not yet been released.

According to the population projections from Claritas, there are an estimated eleven thousand three hundred two (11,302) residents living within the proposed boundaries of the 1 19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area in 2000. Table 6, Race and Ethnicity Characteristics, describes the race and ethnic composition of these residents, below.

Table 6.

Race And Ethnicity Characteristics.

Percentage

Race

Estimated Residents In 2000

1.1%

127

White

11,161

Black

98.8%

0.0%

5

American Indian/ Eskimo/Aleut

129

4/9/2003

106169

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Race

Percentage

Estimated Residents In 2000

11,302

Asian / Pacific Islander

TOTAL:

0.1% 100.0%

Hispanic Origin

Percentage

Estimated Residents In 2000

Hispanic Non-Hispanic TOTAL:

66 11,228 11,294

0.6% 99.4% 100.0%

Source: Claritas, Inc.

Part II — Potential Housing Impact.

Part II contains, as required by the Act, information on any acquisition, relocation program, replacement housing and relocation assistance.

Number And Location Of Units That May Be Removed.

The primary objectives of the Redevelopment Plan are to redevelop vacant land, correct obsolete land-use patterns through redevelopment, and conserve existing housing units. While the Plan does not propose redevelopment of current residential use areas, some displacement of residential units may occur in the process of redeveloping obsolete commercial (mixed-use) buildings and through the consolidation of vacant lots.

Currently, one (1) portion of the Project Area has been the subject of redevelopment proposals. The City issued an R.F.P. on February 13,2001, for the "purchase and redevelopment of properties for new single-family housing near 119^th and Halsted". The land identified by this R.F.P. includes property on South Union

130

106170

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Avenue and South Emerald Avenue between West 1 19^th and West 120^th Streets. However, all of the properties offered in this R.F.P. are vacant lots, and there are no residential buildings or occupied dwelling units present on this land.

In addition to the active development project initiated by the City, there is a possibility that over the twenty-three (23) year life of the Redevelopment Project Area, some inhabited residential units may be removed as a result of implementing the Plan. In order to meet the statutory requirement of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed, a methodology was established that would provide a rough, yet reasonable, estimate. This methodology is described below.

Methodology.

The methodology used to fulfill the statutory requirements of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed involves three (3) steps.

1. Step 1 counts all inhabited residential units previously identified on any underlying acquisition maps. For this purpose, the aforementioned 1.19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Area was reviewed. Since there are twenty-one (21) inhabited residential units on current acquisition maps, the number of residential units that may be removed due to identified acquisition is twenty-one (2 1).
2. Step 2 counts the number of inhabited residential units contained on parcels that are dilapidated as defined by the Act. From the survey conducted by Camiros, Ltd., a total of two (2) buildings have been identified within the Project Area that can be classified as dilapidated and that contain occupied residential units. Each of these buildings was identified as having one (1) occupied dwelling unit. Therefore, the number of inhabited residential units that may be removed due to demolition or rehabilitation of dilapidated buildings is two (2).
3. Step 3 counts the number of inhabited residential units that exist where the future land-use indicated by the Plan will not include residential uses. After reviewing the General Land-Use Plan for the Project Area, we determined that there are forty-six (46) units impacted by changes to the existing land-use. Therefore, the number of inhabited residential units that may be removed due to future land-use change is forty-six (46).

Figure 8, Housing Impact Study Map, identifies the sixty-nine (69) occupied units, which is the sum of Step 1 — Step 3, that could potentially be removed during the

131

4/9/2003

106171

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

twenty-three (23) year life ofthisH9 and Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project. In addition, the specific parcels' P.I.N.S are listed in Table 9, Land Acquisition by Parcel Identification Number and Address located in Appendix A.

Replacement Housing.

In accordance with Section 1 1-74.4-3 (n)(7) of the Act, the City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that affordable replacement housing for any qualified displaced residents whose residence is removed is located in or near the Project Area.

To promote development of affordable housing, the Plan requires that developers receiving tax increment financing assistance for market-rate housing are to set aside at least twenty percent (20%) of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Housing. Generally, this means affordable rental units should be affordable to households earning no more than eighty percent (80%) of the area median income (adjusted for family size), or for sale units affordable to households earning one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the area median income. If, during the twenty-three (23) year life of the 1 19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area, the acquisition plans change, the City shall make every effort to ensure that appropriate replacement housing will be found in either the Project Area or the surrounding Community Areas.

Currently, there are no bona fide residential development projects planned that will contain affordable units. The only prospective residential development project identified is the City sponsored single-family in-fill project near 1 19^th and Halsted Streets. The developer selection process has not yet been finalized and there is a possibility that some of the units may be affordable.

The location, type, and cost of a sample of possible replacement housing units located within the West Pullman, Roseland and Morgan Park Community Areas were determined through classified advertisements from the Chicago Tribune, the Chicago Sun-Times, and from Internet listings Apartments.com during the last part of the month of May, 2001. It is important to note that Chicago has a rental cycle where apartments turn over at a greater rate on May 1 and October 1 of each year. These times would likely reflect a wider variety of rental rates, unit sizes and locations than those available in June. The location, type, and cost of these units is listed in Table 7, Survey of Available Housing Units.

To further determine the availability of replacement rental housing for those residents of rental units, which may potentially be removed, Camiros, Ltd. reviewed the Regional Rental Market Analysis Summary Report, prepared for the Metropolitan Planning Council in November 1999. This report describes vacancy rates by apartment type for three defined sub-regions within the City: North, West,

132

106172

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

and South. The Project Area is located entirely within the South region as defined within the Summary Report.

The Summary Report lists vacancy rates for each of the three (3) defined sub-regions for units in small buildings (two (2) to nine (9) units), which are the predominant building types in the Project Area.   However, the only unit types for which data are available are two (2) and three (3) or more bedrooms. The vacancy rates for units within small buildings within the South region were as follows:

Type/ Size      Vacancy Rate

1. Bedroom 4.4%
2. or more Bedrooms 9.0%

Based on information provided by real estate brokers, and apartment rental agency professionals operating within the West Pullman, Roseland and Morgan Park community areas, typical monthly rents (including heat, but not other utilities) that are affordable for the community encompassing the Project Area ranged as follows:

Type / Size      Rent Range

1-2 Room Studio      $300 - $400

3-4 Rooms, 1 Bedroom      350 - 500

1. Rooms, 2 Bedrooms      400 - 650
2. Rooms, 2 Bedrooms      400 - 700
3. Rooms, 3 Bedrooms      500 - 700

Since one of the key goals of the Plan is to develop infill housing on currently vacant lots and rehabilitate existing deteriorated buildings, it is assumed that displacement, if any, caused by activities as part of the Plan, will occur concurrently with the development of new housing, both rental and for-sale. As a result, it is anticipated that there will be no net loss of units within the Project Area. Furthermore, there is a likelihood that any displacement of the sixty-nine (69) potential units would occur incrementally over the twenty-three (23) year life of the Project  Area  as  individual  development  projects  occur.  Therefore,  it  is not

133

4/9/2003

106173

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

anticipated that there would be a need to relocate more than a few households, if any, in any given year during the full life of the Project Area.

Relocation Assistance.

While the removal or displacement of housing units is not a goal of the Plan, it is possible that a small number of units may be removed in the process of implementing the Plan.  If the removal or displacement of low-income or very low-income residential housing units is required, such residents will be provided with relocation assistance in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations thereunder, including the eligibility criteria.  The City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that affordable replacement housing for the aforementioned households is located in or near the Project Area.

As used in the above paragraph, "low-income households", "very low-income households", and "affordable housing" have the meanings set forth in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act, I 310 ILCS 65/3. As of the date of this study, these statutory terms have the following meaning:

1. "low-income household" means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than fifty percent (50%) but less than eighty percent (80%) of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such adjusted income and median income are determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("H.U.D.") for purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937;
2. "very low-income household" means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is not more than fifty percent (50%) of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as so determined by H.U.D.; and
3. "very, very low-income household" means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is not more than thirty percent (30%) of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as so determined by H.U.D.; and
4. "affordable housing" means residential housing that, so long as the same is occupied by low-income households or very low-income households, requires payment of monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, of no more than thirty percent (30%) of the maximum allowable income for such households, as applicable.

134

106174

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

In order to estimate the number of moderate, low-, very low-, and very, very low-incomes households in the Project Area, Camiros, Ltd. used data available from Claritas,   Inc.,   a  national  demographic  data  provider.     This  information is summarized on Table 8, Household Income, which provides estimates of the number of households within the Project Area at various income levels. Claritas estimates that of all households residing within the Block Group areas encompassed by the Project Area, twenty and eight-tenths percent (20.8%) may be classified as very, very low-income, thirteen and four-tenths percent (13.4%) may be classified as very low-income, twenty and eight-tenths percent (20.8%) may be classified as low-income, and eighteen and nine-tenths percent (18.9%) may be classified as moderate-income households. The remaining twenty-six and two-tenths percent (26.2%) of households may be classified as above moderate-income. These percentages are based on an average household size of four (4) persons, which is rounded up from the average household size of 3.80 1 persons within the Project Area projected by Claritas. Applying these percentages to the three hundred sixty-five (365) occupied housing units (equivalent to households) identified during the survey completed by Camiros, Ltd. reveals the following:

Table 8. Household Income.

Income Category

Percentage Of Households

Number Of Households

Annual Income Range (Average Households Of Four Persons)

$0 - $21,150

20.8%

76

Very, Very Low-Income

Very Low-Income

Low-Income

13.4% 20.8%

49 76

$21,151 - 35,250 $35,251 - 52,500

Moderate-income 18.9%

Above Moderate

Income 26.2%

TOTAL: 100.0%

69

95 365

$52,501 - 84,600 $84,600 - higher

135

Source: Claritas, Inc. and Camiros, Ltd.

4/9/2003

106175

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

As described above, the estimates of the total moderate-, low-, very low-, or very very low-income households within the Project Area collectively represent seventy-three and eight-tenths percent (73.8%) of the total inhabited units and those households below moderate-income collectively represent fifty-five and zero-tenths percent (55.0%) of the total inhabited units. Therefore, replacement housing for any displaced households over the course of the twenty-three (23) year life of the 1 19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project should be affordable at these income levels. It should be noted that these income levels are likely to change over the twenty-three (23) year life of the Project Area as both median income changes and income levels within the Project Area change.

JO.

Provisions For Amending The Plan.

The Plan may be amended pursuant to the provisions of the Act.

11.

City Of Chicago  Commitment To Fair Employment Practices And Affirmative Action

The City is committed to and will affirmatively implement the following principles in redevelopment agreements with respect to the Plan. The City may implement various neighborhood grant programs imposing these or different requirements.

1. The assurance of equal opportunity in all personnel and employment actions, including, but not limited to: hiring, training, transfer, promotion, discipline, fringe benefits, salary, employment working conditions, termination, et cetera, without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, handicapped status, national origin, creed or ancestry.
2. Developers will meet City of Chicago standards for participation of Minority Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises and the City Resident Construction Worker Employment Requirement as required in redevelopment agreements.

136

106176

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

2. This commitment to affirmative action will ensure that all members of the protected groups are sought out to compete for all job openings and promotional opportunities.

4.      The City requires that developers who receive T.I.F. assistance for market rate housing set aside twenty percent (20%) of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Housing. Generally, this means the affordable for-sale units should be priced at a level that is affordable to persons earning no more than one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the area median income, and affordable rental units should be affordable to persons earning no more than eighty percent (80%) of the area median income.

In order to implement these principles, the City shall require and promote equal employment practices and affirmative action on the part of itself and its contractors and vendors. In particular, parties engaged by the City shall be required to agree to the principles set forth in this section.

[Appendix "A"--Figures   1, 2, 3, 4,  5, 6,  7 and 8 and Tables 7 and:9 referred to in this Amended 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan and Project printed on pages 106183 through  106207 of this Journal]

[Appendix "D" referred to in this Amended 1 19    and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan and Project printed on pages  106227 through 106248 of this Journal.)

Appendices "B" and "C" referred to in this Amended 1 19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan and Project read as follows:

Appendix "B°.

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Legal Description Of The 11 9"¹ And Halsted Redevelopment  Project Area.

All that part of Sections 20, 2 1, 28 (north of the Indian Boundary Line) and 29 in

137

4/9/2003

106177

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian bounded and described as follows:

beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of 115^th Street with the centerline of Morgan Street; thence south along said centerline of Morgan Street to the westerly extension of a line 8 feet north of and parallel with the north line of Lot  1  in Maple Park Court Resubdivision of part of Stanley Mathew's Subdivision in the west half of the southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian, said line being also the centerline of the 16 foot alley lying north of and adjoining said Lot 1 in Maple Park Court Resubdivision; thence east along said easterly extension and along the line 8 feet north of and parallel with the north line of Lot 1 in Maple Park Court Resubdivision and along the easterly extension thereof to the westerly line of the Penn Central Rail Road right-of-way; thence southeasterly along said westerly line of the Penn Central Rail Road right-of-way to the centerline of 117^th Street; thence west along said centerline of 1 17^th Street to the northerly extension of the centerline of the 16 foot alley lying east and adjoining the east line of Lots 12 through 35, inclusive, in Block 1 in the resubdivision of the east half of original Blocks 8 and 11 and all of that part of Block 7, lying west of the P.C.C. & St. L. R.R. in original subdivision of the east half of the southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence south along said northerly extension and along said centerline of the 16 foot alley and along the southerly extension thereof to the centerline of 118^th Street; thence east along said centerline of 118^th Street to the northerly extension of the east line of the alley lying east of and adjoining the east line of Lots 1 through 15, inclusive, in Block 2 in said resubdivision of the east half of original Blocks 8 and 11 and all of that part of Block 7, lying west of the P.C.C. 8t St. L. R.R. in original subdivision of the east half of the southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence south along said northerly extension and along the east line of the alley lying east of and adjoining the east line of Lots 1 through 15, inclusive, in Block 2 in said resubdivision and along the southerly extension thereof to the centerline of the alley lying south of and adjoining the south line of Lot 15 in said Block 2 in the resubdivision of the east half of original Blocks 8 and 11 and all of that part of Block 7, lying west of the P.C.C. & St. L. R.R. in original subdivision of the east half of the southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence west along the centerline of said alley lying south of and adjoining the south line of Lot 15 in Block 2 in said resubdivision to the east line of Peoria Street; thence west along a straight line to the point of intersection of the west

138

106178

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

line of Peoria Street with the centerline of the alley lying south of and adjoining the south line of Lots 29 and 18 in Block 4 in the resubdivision of the west half of Blocks 8 and 11 and all of Blocks 9 and 10, except Lots 19, 22 and 23 of Block 10 of the original subdivision of the east half of the southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence west along the centerline of the alley lying south of and adjoining the south line of Lots 29 and 18 in Block 4 in said resubdivision and the westerly extension thereof to the centerline of Sangamon Street; thence north along said centerline of Sangamon Street to the easterly extension of the centerline of the alley lying north of and adjoining the north line of Lots 19, 20 and 2 1 in Block 3 in said resubdivision of the west half of Blocks 8 and 11 and all of Blocks 9 and 10, except Lots 19, 22 and 23 of Block 10 of the original subdivision of the east half of the southeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence west along said centerline of the alley lying north of and adjoining the north line of Lots 19, 20 and 2 1 in Block 3 in said resubdivision to the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 2 1 in Block 3 in said resubdivision; thence north along said northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 21 to the south line of Lot 18 in Block 3 in said resubdivision; thence west along said south line of Lot 18 and along the westerly extension .thereof and along the south line of Lot 22 in Block 3 in said resubdivision- to the east line of Morgan Street; thence south along said east line of Morgan Street to the north line of 1 19^th Street; thence east along said north line of 1 19^th Street to the east line of Peoria Street; thence south along said east line of Peoria Street to the westerly extension of the northerly line of Lot 1 in Block 1 of First Addition of West Pullman Subdivision; thence easterly along said westerly extension of the northerly line of Lot 1 in Block 1 of First Addition of West Pullman Subdivision to the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence southerly along the westerly line of Lots 1 through 11, inclusive, in said Block 1 of First Addition of West Pullman Subdivision to the north line of 120^th Street; thence southerly to the northwest corner of Lot 1 in Block 8 of said First Addition to West Pullman Subdivision; thence southerly along the westerly line of Lots 1 through 18, inclusive, in said Block 8 to the southwest corner of said Lot 18; thence southerly a distance of 25.00 feet along the prolongation of the last described course; thence 165 feet, more or less, westerly to the east line of vacated Green Street; thence southerly along said east line of vacated Green Street to the northerly right-of-way line of Illinois Central Railroad; thence west along said northerly right-of-way line of Illinois Central Railroad to the east line of Peoria Street; thence south along said east line of Peoria Street to the southerly right-of-way line of the Illinois Central Railroad; thence east along said southerly right-of-way line of the Illinois Central Railroad to the northwest corner of Lot 1 in Block 9 of First Addition to West Pullman Subdivision; thence south along the westerly line of Lots 1 through 12

139

4/9/2003

106179

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

to the easterly extension of the southerly line of Lot 11 in Block 1 of the resubdivision of Blocks 9 to 16, inclusive, of said First Addition to West Pullman Subdivision; thence west along said easterly extension of the southerly line of Lot 11 in Block 1 in said resubdivision, a distance of 8 feet, to the centerline of the alley lying west of and parallel with Halsted Street, said alley being also east of and adjoining said Lot 11; thence south along said centerline of the alley lying west of and parallel with Halsted Street to the centerline of 123^rd street; thence east along said centerline of 123^rd Street to the centerline of Emerald Avenue; thence north along said centerline of Emerald Avenue to the centerline of 122^nd Street; thence east along said centerline of 122^nd Street to the westerly line of the right-of-way of the Penn Central Railroad; thence southeasterly along said westerly line of the right-of-way of the Penn Central Railroad to the centerline of 123^rd Street; thence east along said centerline of 123^rd Street to the easterly line of the right-of-way of the Penn Central Railroad; thence northwesterly along said easterly line of the right-of-way of the Penn Central Railroad to the southerly extension of the centerline of the alley west of and parallel with Lowe Avenue, said alley being also west of and adjoining the west line of Lots 1 through 22 in Block 34 in West Pullman, a subdivision in the west half of the northeast quarter and the northwest quarter of Section 28, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence north along said centerline of the alley west of and parallel with Lowe Avenue to the south line of the right-of-way of the Illinois Central Railroad; thence east along said south line of the right-of-way of the Illinois Central Railroad to the east line of the east half of the northwest quarter of Section 28, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian, said east line of the east half of the northwest quarter of Section 28 being also the centerline of Stewart Avenue; thence north along said centerline of Stewart Avenue to the north line of the right-of-way of the Illinois Central Railroad; thence west along said north line of the right-of-way of the Illinois Central Railroad to the center-line of Lowe Avenue; thence north along said centerline of Lowe Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 37 in Block 16 in said West Pullman; thence east along said westerly extension and along the south line of Lot 37 and along the easterly extension thereof to the centerline of the alley east of and parallel with Lowe Avenue, said alley being also east of and adjoining said Lot 37; thence north along said centerline of the alley east of and parallel with Lowe Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 7 in said Block 16 in West Pullman; thence east along said westerly extension and along the south line of Lot 7 in said Block 16 in West Pullman to the west line of Wallace Street; thence east along a straight line to the southwest corner of Lot 40 in Block 17 in said West Pullman; thence east along the south line of said Lot 40 in Block 17 in West Pullman and along the easterly extension thereof and along the south line of Lot 7 in said Block 17 in West Pullman and along the easterly extension thereof

140

106180

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

to the centerline of Parnell Avenue; thence south along said centerline of Pamell Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of the north 12.5 feet of Lot 38 in Block 18 in said West Pullman; thence east along said westerly extension and along the south line of the north 12.5 feet of Lot 38 in Block 18 in said West Pullman and the easterly extension thereof to the centerline of the alley east of and parallel with Parnell Avenue, said alley being also east of and adjoining said Lot 38; thence north along said centerline of the alley east of and parallel with Parnell Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 6 in said Block 18 in West Pullman; thence east along said westerly extension and along the south line of said Lot 6 in Block 18 in West Pullman, and along the easterly extension thereof, to the centerline of Normal Avenue; thence north along said centerline of Normal Avenue to the westerly extension of the centerline of the alley south of and parallel with 119^th Street in Block 6 in West Pullman, said alley being also south of and adjoining the south line of Lots 1 through 10, inclusive, in the resubdivision of that part of West Pullman lying in the northwest quarter of the west half of the northeast quarter of Section 28, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence east along said centerline of the alley south of and parallel with 119^th Street to the centerline  of Wentworth  Avenue;  thence  north along said centerline of Wentworth Avenue to the easterly extension of the centerline of the alley north, of and parallel with 119^th Street, said alley being also north of and adjoining Lots , 23 through 32, inclusive, in Block 4 in Thomas Scanlan's Addition to Pullman, being a subdivision in the east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 2 1, Township 37 North, Range 1.4 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence west along said easterly extension and along the centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 119^th Street to the centerline of Harvard Avenue; thence north along said centerline of Harvard Avenue to the easterly extension of the centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 1 19^th Street, said alley being also north of and adjoining the north line of Lots 17 through 26, inclusive, in Block 6 in A. 0. Tylor's Addition to Pullman, a subdivision of the east half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter and of the west half of the west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 2 1, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence west along said easterly extension and the centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 119^th Street to centerline of Stewart Avenue; thence south along the centerline of Stewart Avenue to the easterly extension of the centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 1 19^th Street, said alley being also north of and adjoining the north line of Lots 6 through 15, inclusive, in Hugh Lauder's Subdivision of Lot 8 in Block 5 in said A. 0. Tylor's Addition to Pullman; thence west along said easterly extension and the centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 119^th Street to the centerline of Eggleston Avenue; thence north along said centerline of Eggleston Avenue to the easterly extension of the

141

4/9/2003

106181

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 119^th Street, said alley being also north of and adjoining the north line of Lots 10 through 19, inclusive, in Block 4 in said A. 0. Tylor's Addition to Pullman; thence west along said easterly extension and the centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 119^th Street to the centerline of Normal Avenue; thence south along said centerline of Normal Avenue to the easterly extension of the centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 119^th Street, said alley being also north of and adjoining the north line of Lots 17 through 26, inclusive, in Block 4 in Hannah B. Gano's Addition to Pullman, being a subdivision of the west half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 2 1, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence west along said easterly extension and the centerline of the alley north of and parallel with 119^th Street to the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 28 in Block 4 in Kneeland and Wright's Second Addition to West Pullman in the southwest quarter of Section 2 1, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence north along said southerly extension and the east line of Lot 28 in Block 4 in Kneeland and Wright's Second Addition to West Pullman and the northerly extension thereof to the centerline of 1 18^th Place; thence west along said'centerline of 118^th Place to the southerly extension of the centerline of the alley east of and parallel with Halsted Street, said alley being also west of and adjoining the west line of Lots 1. through 11, inclusive, in said Block 4 in Kneeland and Wright's Second Addition to West Pullman; thence north along said centerline of the alley east of and parallel with Halsted Street to the centerline of 1 18^th Street; thence east along said centerline of 118^th Street to the southerly extension of the centerline of the alley east of and parallel with Halsted Street, said alley being also east of and adjoining the east line of Lots 170 through 165, inclusive, in Sharpshooter's Park Subdivision of part of Sharpshooter's Park, said park being the west half of the southwest quarter of Section 2 1, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence north along said southerly extension and along the centerline of the alley east of and parallel with Halsted Street to the centerline of 1 15^th Street; thence west along said centerline of 115^th Street to the centerline of Halsted Street; thence north along said centerline of Halsted Street to the centerline of 114^th Street; thence west along said centerline of 114^th Street to the southerly extension of the centerline of the alley west of and parallel with Green Street, said alley being also east of and adjoining the east line of Lots 16 through 30, inclusive, in Sheldon Heights West Fifth Addition, a subdivision of a part of the east half of the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence north along said southerly extension of the centerline of the alley west of and parallel with Green Street to the easterly extension of the south line said Lot 30 in Sheldon Heights West Fifth Addition; thence west along said easterly extension and the south line said

142

106182

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Lot 30 in Sheldon Heights West Fifth Addition and along the westerly extension thereof to the southeast corner of Lot 31 in said Sheldon Heights West Fifth Addition; thence continuing west along the south line of said Lot 31 in said Sheldon Heights West Fifth Addition and along the westerly extension thereof to the southwest corner of said Sheldon Heights West Fifth Addition; thence north along the west line of said Sheldon Heights West Fifth Addition, said west line being also the west line of an 8 foot alley west of and parallel with Peoria Street, to the easterly extension of a line 16 feet south of and parallel with the south line of Lots 19 and 20 in the Sixth Addition to Sheldon Heights West, being a subdivision of part of the east two-thirds of the west three-eighths of the north half of the east half of the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence west along said easterly extension and along a line 16 feet south of and parallel with the south line of Lots 19 and 20 in the Sixth Addition to Sheldon Heights West to the southwesterly line of said Sixth Addition to Sheldon Heights West Subdivision, said southwesterly line being also a line 8 feet southwest of and parallel with the southwesterly line of Lots 20 through 23, inclusive in said Sixth Addition to Sheldon Heights West; thence northwest along said southwesterly line of said • • Sixth Addition to Sheldon Heights West Subdivision to the point of intersection ofsaid southwesterly line with the west line of said Sixth Addition to Sheldon Heights West Subdivision, said point being 1,032.98 feet south of the north line of the "west half of the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence southwesterly along a straight line to a point on the west line of the east half of the northeast quarter of Section 20, Township 37 North, Range  14 East of the Third Principal Meridian, said point being 1,188.76 feet south of the north line of said Section 20, as measured along said west line of the east half of the northeast quarter of Section 20; thence south along said west line of the east half of the northeast quarter of Section 20 to the northeasterly line of the right-of-way of the Penn Central Railroad; thence northwest along said northeasterly line of the right-of-way of the Penn Central Railroad to the centerline of 111* Street; thence west along said centerline of 111^th Street to the southwesterly line of the right-of-way of the Penn Central Railroad; thence southeast along said southwesterly line of the right-of- way of the Penn Central Railroad to the centerline of 115^th Street; thence west along said centerline of 1 IS* Street to the point of beginning on the centerline of Morgan Street, all in Cook County, Illinois.

143

4/9/2003

REPORTS   OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" - Figure 1. (To Amended 119^th And  Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

 

144

Boundary Map.

106184

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "A" -- Figure 2. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Redevelopment  Area Designations.

nun nut touKOJurr

m~iKiLrrfD mmuomtm mi* winwjllmix wcumwu. pmw cxyctflnrATioH mu

I i I I ! i I

145

106185

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" - Figure 3. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Existing  Land-Use Map. (Page 1 of 3)

LEGEND

RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE

COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTION AURE&DENTiA

COMMERCIAL NWUCAWSTTfUnOHAL

INDUSTRIAL VACANT BUILDING VACANT LOT

146

106186

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "A" - Figure 3. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

147

Existing  Land-Use Map. (Page 2 of 3)

 

4/9/2003

106187

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" - Figure 3. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Existing  Land-Use Map. (Page 3 of 3)

 

106188

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "A" - Figure 4. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Existing Zoning Map. (Page 1 of 3)

LEGEND

zoning DISTRICT

BOUNDARY

M I-l : Restricted Menufscturing Districts

 

149

4/9/2003

106189

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" - Figure 4. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Existing Zoning Map. (Page 2 of 3)

 

R 3 : General Residence District B 4-1 : Restricted Service District! C I-l : Restricted Commercial Districts C 2-1: General Commercial Districts M I-l: Restricted Manufacturing Districts

LEGEND E

ZONING DlSTWtt BOUNDARY

I

150

106190

JOURNAL--CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "A" - Figure 4. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Existing Zoning Map. (Page 3 of 3)

ii i ix<*Wiyi "Vf" ^7 *' iurn

mm

 

mmm

g= ii

H(iWJ«!l{|l!i!;iH!lI?!fi3^

151

?5

li

11.1

 

u Iii

106191

4/9/2003

REPORTS   OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" — Figure 5. (To Amended  1 19^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

152

Public Facilities Map.

 

106192

JOURNAL--CITY     COUNCIL--CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "A" - Figure 6. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

153

General Land-Use Plan. (Page 1 of 3)

 

4/9/2003

106193

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" - Figure 6. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

154

General Land-Use Plan. (Page 2 of 3)

 

106194

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Append ix "A" - Figure 6. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

General Land-Use Plan. (Page 3 of 3)

 

4/9/2003

106195

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" - Figure 7. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

156

Acquisition Map. (Page 1 of 3)

 

4/9/2003

106196

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

Appendix "A" — Figure 7. (To Amended 119^th And  Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Acquisition Map. (Page 2 of 3)

	On :
	•fe-
Iii«"iH
'ii	ll
!(«■ ,«—Hi [•••>: its

rlon

LEGEND

PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED

ipDDbflW

NOTE: THIS MAP REFLECTS THE

ACOUtSfTION POLICY OF THE PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED lit"" 4 HALSTED REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESIGNATION

157

4/9/2003

106197

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" - Figure 7. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Acquisition Map. (Page 3 of 3)

 

106198

JOURNAL--CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "A" - Figure 8. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Location  Of Occupied Residential Properties That May Be Removed. (Page  1 of 3)

LOCATION OF OCCUPIED RESQEJfllf PROPERTIES THAT MAY BE REMOVE!

LEGEND

159

4/9/2003

106199

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "A" - Figure 8. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Location  Of Occupied  Residential Properties That May Be Removed. (Page 2 of 3)

1
ii&ilin

LEGEND

LOCATION OF OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES THAT MAY BE REMOVED

;pDDbo\\

160

106200

JOURNAL-CITY     COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "A" - Figure 8. (To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Location  Of Occupied Residential Properties That May Be Removed. (Page 3 of 3)

 

4/9/2003

106201

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Table 7.

(To Amended 119^th And  Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Survey  Of Available Housing Units.

• Location                i • «f Bedrooms			Rental Price	Amenities	Section 8 ( Accepted	Community Ama
[	) 04465 S.Ct>jiiK		$350	Share kitchen &bath, includes furniture		fuuman
2	95"&Vanderpole	1	S430	Includes Heat		Beverly
3	112* King Dr.	1	$400-$485	Includes Heat		Washington Hgts.
4	11 r& Vernon	1	$460			Roseland
5	108" & Indian*	1	$495	Includes Heat		Roseland ,
6	108* AS. King Dr.	1	$500	Includes Heat		Roseland 1
7	Nr. I15B&KineDr.	'	$507- $525	Includes Heat	Yes	Roseland/ | Pullman
8	li9*&U>ngwood	1	$545			Morgan Park ]
o	87* & Carpenter	1	$575			Washington Hgts.
10	Nrll2u&KingDr.	1	$595		Yes	Roseland
11	90" Blk of Beverly		$600			Washington Hgts.
12	Roseland Pullman	14 2	$350-tQlQ			Roseland/
13	101" & May	1-2	$550-$850	Includes Heat and Cable	Yes	Washington Hgts.
M	773-909-9257	1 &2	$565-$785	Includes Heat		Washington HisyBevedy
15	Nr. 107" & Michigan	2	$500	Includes Heal	Yes	Washington Hgts.
16	11748 S. Woodlawn	2	$575			Roseland
17	i 1315 S. Unglcy	2	$600			Pullman
18	89* & Ada	2	$696	Includes Utility		Washington Hgts.
10	J07"Aljmgley	2	$700		Yes       1 Roseland
20	10539 S. Corliss	2	$700		Yes	Pullman
21	101" & King Dr.	2	$725			Roseland
22	9000 S. LaQin	2	$750	Includes Utilities		Washington Hgts.
23	SS"-ii Ada	2	$850	Includes Heat	YesS	Washington Hgts
24	119" Aljunlle	?	$850			Pullman
25	91* & Greenwood	3	$550	Includes Heat		Washington Hgts.
26	Nr.       114* & Wentworth	3	$595			Roseland
27	1111** Kins Dr.	3	$600		Yes	Roseland
28	UQ1"* State	3	$650	Includes Heat		Roseland
29	111* & Halsted	3	$750			Roseland
30	115u& Princeton	3	$800			Washington Hgts.
3)	11600 S. Ada	3	$950			Roseland
32	8901 S.Ada	3	$950		Yes	Washington HrU.
33	90*AAda	3	$1000	Includes Garage and Yard		Washington Hgts.
34	107" & Perry	3 and 4	$975		Yes	Roseland
35	503 H. 94" !Jt.	4	$540	Includes Heat		Roseland
36	136 E. 108th	4	$650			Roseland
37	114" 4 Lowe	4	$1300		■ Yes	Roseland
38	536 W. 104th	5	$1400		■ Yes	Roseland
39	110" 4 Vernon	5	$675 |			Roseland

162

4/9/2003

106202

JOURNAL—CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

Table 9.

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Land Acquisition By Parcel Identification Number And Address. (Page 1 of 6)

Parcel Identification Number

25-20-210-043-0000

25-20-2 10-037-0000

25-20-216-037-0000

25-20-404-001-0000

25-20-404-007-0000

25-20-404-I 08-0000

25-20-404-020-0000

25-20-404-021-0000

25-20-404-022-0000

25-20-404-023-0000

25-20-404-024-0000

25-20-404-025-0000

25-20-404-043-0000

25-20-404-044-0000

25-20-404-045-0000

25-20-404-046-0000

25-20-404-I 07-0000

25-20-412-006-0000

25-20-412-008-0000

25-20-418-034-0000

25-20-418-035-0000

25-20-418-036-0000

25-20-418-037-0000

25-20-418-038-0000

25-20-418-039-0000

25-20-418-048-0000

25-20-418-049-0000

25-20-418-050-0000

25-20-418-051-0000

25-20-418-025-0000

25-20-418-026-0000

25-20-418-027-0000

25-20-418-028-0000

25-20-418-029-0000

25-20-418-030-0000 25-20-418-031-0000 25-20-418-032-0000 25-20-418-033-0000 25-20-418-023-0000 25-20-420-034-0000 25-20-420-035-0000 25-20-420-036-0000 25-28-I 1 1-001 -0000 25-28-I 1 I-005-0000 25-28-I 1 I-006-0000

Parcel Address

11239 S. Morgan Si 11253 S. Sangamon St. 11236 S. Morgan St 955 W. 115th St. 11501 S. Green St. 11513 S.Green St. 11533 S. Peoria St 11539 S. Peoria St 11543 S. Peoria St 11549 S. Peoria St 11553 S. Peoria St 11559 S. Peoria St 11520 S. Halsted St 11522 S. Halsted St 11526 S. Halsted St 11528 S. Halsted St 11513 S.Green St. 830 W. 117th St 820 W. 117th St 823 W. 117th St 11700 S. Halsted St 11706 S. Halsted St 11710 S. Halsted St 11712 S. Halsted St 11716 S. Halsted St 11720 S. Halsted St 11724 S. Halsted St 800 W. 118th St 11756 S. Halsted St 844 W. 118th St 840 W. 118th St 838 W. 118th St 834 W. 118th St 832 W. 118th St 830 W. 118th St 828 W. 118th St 826 W. 118th St 822 W. 118th St 843 W. 117th St 940 W. 119th St 936 W. 119th St 934 W. 119th St 661 W. 120th St 12013 S. Lowe Ave. 12017 S. Lowe Ave.

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

City   State   Zip Code

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

163

106203

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Table 9.

(To Amended   1 19^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Land Acquisition  By  Parcel Identification Number And Address. (Page 2 of 6)

Parcel Identification Number

25-28-1 1 I-O07-O000 25-28-I 1 I-008-0000 25-28-I 1 I-009-0000 25-28-112-024-0000 25-28-I 13-009-0000 25-28-I 13-01 0-0000 25-28-I 13-026-0000 25-28-113-027-0000 25-21-328-001-0000 25-21-328-002-0000 25-21-328-003-0000 25-21-328-004-0000 25-21-328-005-0000 25-21-328-006-0000 25-21-328-01 1-0000 25-21-328-012-0000 25-21-328-013-0000 25-21-328-014-0000 25-21-328-015-0000 25-21-328-016-0000 25-21-328-020-0000 25-21-328-019-0000

25-21-330-045-0000 25-21-330-037-0000 25-21-330-042-0000 25-21-331-030-0000 25-21-331-031-0000 25-21-331-032-0000 25-29-202-004-0000 25-29-202-005-0000 25-29-202-006-0000 25-29-202-007-0000 25-29-202-008-0000 25-29-202-009-0000 25-29-202-010-0000 25-29-202-01 I-0000 25-29-21 O-042-0000 25-29-21 O-023-0000 25-29-21 O-024-0000

25-29-210-027-0000 25-29-21 O-032-0000 25-29-210-033-0000 25-29-21 O-036-0000 25-29-210-037-0000 25-29-218-019-0000

Parcel Address

755 W. 753 W. 749 W. 747 W. 743 W. 750 W.

12019 S. Lowe Ave. 12021 S. Lowe Ave. 12025 S. Lowe Ave. 537 W. 120th St. 12017 S. Parnell Ave. 12019 S. Pamell Ave. 12006 S. Pamell Ave. 12010 S. Normal Ave. 757 W. 118th PIc.

118th Pk. 118th PIc. 118th PIc. 118th PIc. 118th Pic. 119th St.

748 W.      119th St.

744 W.      119th St.

742 W.      119th St.

740 W.      119th St.

738 W.      119th St.

736 W.      119th St.

734 W.

658 W.

652 W.

642 W.

618 W.

616 W.

614 W. 11932 S 11934 11942 11944

S. S. S.

11954 11956 12100 12104 12108 12116 12134

119th St. 119th St. 119th St. 119th St. 119th St. 119th St. 119th St. Halsted St. Halsted St. Halsted St. Halsted St. 11948 S. Halsted St. 11950 S. Halsted St. Halsted St. Halsted St. Halsted St. Halsted St. Halsted St. Halsted St. Halsted St. 12138 S. Halsted St. 12144 S. Halsted St. 12148 S. Halsted St. 12200 S. Halsted St.

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

City   State   Zip Code

Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicaoo Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago . Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago

164

106204

JOURNAL--CITY     COUNCIL--CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Table 9.

(To Amended 119^ And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Land Acquisition By Parcel Identification Number And Address. (Page 3 of 6)

Parcel Identification Number

25-29-218-020-0000 25-29-218-021-0000 25-28-124-008-0000 25-28-I 24-009-0000 25-28-I 24-01 0-0000 25-28-I 24-01 I-0000 25-28-I 24-012-0000 25-28-124-013-0000 25-28-I 24-014-0000 25-28-124-015-0000 25-28-I 24-016-0000 25-28-I 24-017-0000 25-28-I 08-019-0000 25-28-I 08-020-0000 25-28-I 08-025-0000 25-28-I 08-026-0000 25-28-I 08-027-0000 25-28-I 08-028-0000 25-28-I 08-029-0000 25-28-I 08-030-0000 25-28-I 08-031-0000 25-28-I 08-033-0000 25-28-I 08-034-0000 25-28-I 08-035-0000 25-28-I 08-038-0000 25-28-I 08-039-0000 25-28-I 08-040-0000 25-28-I 09-002-0000 25-28-I 09-003-0000 25-28-I 09-004-0000 25-28-I 09-008-0000 25-28-I 09-009-0000 25-28-I 09-01 I-0000 25-28-I 09-01 0-0000 25-28-I 09-017-0000 25-28-I 09-018-0000 25-28-I 09-001-0000 25-28-I 16-007-0000 25-28-I 16-008-0000 25-28-I 16-009-0000 25-28-I 16-01 I-0000 25-28-I 16-012-0000 25-28-I 16-013-0000 25-28-I 16-014-0000 25-28-I 16-015-0000

Parcel Address

12202 S. Halsted St. 12204 S. Halsted St. 12219 S. Halsted St. 12221 S. Halsted St. 12223 S. Halsted St. 12227 S. Halsted St. 12229 S. Halsted St. 12231 S. Halsted St. 12233 S. Halsted St. 12235 S. Halsted St. 12239 S. Halsted St. 12241 S. Halsted St. 12055 S. Halsted St. 12002 S. Emerald Ave. 12018 S. Emerald Av. 12020 S. Emerald Av. 12022 S. Emerald Av. 12026 S. Emerald Av. 12028 S. Emerald Av. 12030 S. Emerald Av. 12032 S. Emerald Av. 12040 S. Emerald Av. 12042 S. Emerald Av. 12044 S. Emerald Av. 12050 S. Emerald Av. 12052 S. Emerald Av. 12054 S. Emerald Av. 723 W. 120th St. 721 W. 120th St. 717 W. 120th St. 709 W. 120th St. 701 W. 120th St. 719 W. 120th St. 12045 S. Emerald Ave. 12026 S. Union Ave. 12028 S. Union Ave.

725 W. 120th St. 12117 S. Halsted St. 12119 S. Halsted St. 12123 S. Halsted St. 12127 S. Halsted St. 12129 S. Halsted St. 12133 S. Halsted St. 12135 S. Halsted St. 12137 S. Halsted St.

165

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL IL

IL

IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60680

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

City   State   Zip Code

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

4/9/2003

106205

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Table 9.

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Land Acquisition By Parcel Identification Number And Address. (Page 4 of 6)

Parcel Identification Number

25-28-1 16-016-0000 25-28-I 16-023-0000 25-21-334-033-0000 25-21-334-025-0000 25-21-422-022-0000 25-21-424-033-0000 25-28-200-005-0000 25-28-200-006-0000 25-28-201-001-0000 25-28-201-002-0000 25-28-201-003-0000 25-28-201-008-0000 25-28-201-009-0000 25-28-201-01 0-0000 25-28-202-O02-0000 25-28-203-004-0000 25-28-203-005-0000 25-28-203-007-0000 25-28-203-008-0000 25-28-1 04-007-0000 25-28-104-008-0000 25-28-I 04-024-0000 25-28-I 04-025-0000 25-28-I 04-026-0000 25-28-104-027-0000 25-28-I 04-034-0000 25-28-I 04-043-0000 25-28-I 04-044-0000 25-28-I 05-002-0000 25-28-I 05-004-0000 25-28-I 05-005-0000 25-28-I 05-006-0000 25-28-I 05-007-0000 25-28-I 05-008-0000 25-28-I 07-007-0000 25-28-1 07-008-0000 25-28-100-006-0000 25-28-I 00-017-0000 25-28-I 00-013-0000 25-28-100-019-0000 25-28-I 00-018-0000 25-28-100-O 16-0000 25-28-I  00-01 I-0000 25-28-I 00-002-0000 25-28-I 00-001-0000

Parcel Address

12139 S. Halsted St.

12157 S. Halsted St.

11857 S. Normal Av. 452 W. 119th St 352 W. 119th St. 236 W. 119th St 347 W. 119th St. 345 W. 119th St 325 W. 119th St 321 W. 119th St 315 W. 119th St 307 W. 119th St. 305 W. 119th St 301 W. 119th St 247 W. 119th St 217 W. 119th St 215 W. 119th St 209 W. 119th St 207 W. 119th St 537 W. 119th St

1. W. 119th St 558 W. 120th St 552 W. 120th St 548 W. 120th St.

11914 s. Parnell Ave. 11936 S. Parnell Ave.

1. W. 120th St 534 W. 120th St. 521 W. 119th St 517 W. 119th St 515 W. 119th St 513 W. 119th St 507 W. 119th St 505 W. 119th St 409 W. 119th St 407 W. 119th St.

11935 S. Halsted St. 11923 S. Halsted St. 11939 S. Halsted St. 11937 S. Halsted St. 11945 S. Halsted St.

739 W. 119th St. 11957 S. Halsted St. 11921 S. Halsted St. 11911-1 1919 S. Halsted st

166

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL IL

IL

IL IL

IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL IL

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

City   State   Zip Code

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Dixmoor

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

106206

4/9/2003

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

Table 9.

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Land Acquisition By Parcel Identification Number And Address. (Page 5 of 6)

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

25-28-1

Parcel Identification Number

00-007-0000 00-008-0000

1. 009-0000
2. 004-0000

01-005-0000 01-012-0000 01-014-0000 01-016-0000 01-026-0000 01-027-0000 01.O28-0000 01-029-0000 01-030-0000 01-032-0000 01-042-0000

25-28-I 25-28-I 25-28-I 25-28-I 25-28-I 25-28-I 25-28-I 25-28-I 25-28-I

25-28-I 01-041-0000 25-28-I 01-022-0000 25-28-I 01-023-0000 25-28-I 01-024-0000 25-28-I 01-036-0000 25-28-I 01-037-0000 25-28-I 02-001-0000 25-28-102-002-0000 25-28-I 02-003-0000 25-28-I 02-004-0000 25-28-I 02-012-0000 25-28-I 02-013-0000 25-28-I 02-014-0000 25-28-I 02-016-0000 25-28-I 02-017-0000 25-28-I 02-018-0000 25-28-1 02-021-0000 25-28-I 02-022-0000 25-28-I 02-038-0000 25-28-I 02-039-0000 25-28-I 02-040-0000

1. 041-0000
2. 003-0000

03-004-0000 03-005-0000 03-006-0000 03-009-0000 03-022-0000 03-026-0000 03-027-0000

Parcel Address

11937 S. Halsted      St.

11939 S. Halsted      St.

11941      S. Halsted      St.

717 W. 119th      St.

715 W. 119th      St

11917 S. Emerald Ave. 11921 S. Emerald Ave. 11927 S. Emerald Ave. 11914 S. Union Ave.

11920      S. Union Ave.

11924 S. Union Ave.

11926 S. Union Ave.

11928 S. Union Ave.

11932 S. Union Ave.

11906 S. Union Ave.

701 W. 119th St 11947 S. Emerald Ave. 11949 S. Emerald Ave. 11951 S. Emerald Ave.

11942      S. Union Ave.

11946 S. Union Ave.

655 W. 119th St. 653 W. 119th St. 651 W. 119th St 647 W. 119th St

11925 11927

11939

S. Union Ave. S. Union Ave. 11933 S. Union Ave. 11935 S. Union Ave. S. Union Ave. 658 W. 120th St 650 W. 120th St. 640 W. 638 W.

11921      S. Union Ave.

120th St 120th St. 636 W. 120th St. 642 W. 120th St. 619 W. 119th St. 617 W. 119th St. 615 W. 119th St 611 W. 119th St 601 W. 119th St. 11947 S. Lowe Ave.

614 W. 120th St. 11914 S. Wallace St.

JL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

City State   Zip Code

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

167

4/9/2003

106207

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Table 9.

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Land Acquisition By Parcel Identification Number And Address. (Page 6 of 6)

Parcel Identification Number

25-28-1 03-039-0000 25-28-1 03-040-0000 25-28-1 03-041-0000 25-28-I 03-043-0000 25-28-I 03-044-0000 25-21-320-001-0000 25-21-320-003-0000 25-21-320-004-0000 25-21-320-031-0000 25-28-I 17-021-0000 25-28-I 17-022-0000 25-28-I 17-023-0000 25-28-117-024-0000 25-28-I 17-025-0000 25-28-I 17-026-0000 25-28-I 17-027-0000 25-28-I 17-028-0000 25-28-I 17-029-0000 25-28-I 18-001-0000 25-28-I 18-002-0000 25-28-I 18-003-0000 25-28-I 18-007-0000 25-28-I 18-008-0000 25-28-I 18-009-0000 25-28-I 18-01 0-0000 25-28-I  18-01 1-0000 25-28-1 18-012-0000 25-28-I 18-013-0000 25-28-I 18-034-0000 25-28-I 18-035-0000 25-28-I 1 O-001 -0000 25-28-I 1 O-002-0000 25-28-I 1 O-003-0000 25-28-1 1 O-008-0000 25-28-I 1 O-021 -0000 25-28-I 1 O-022-0000 25-28-I 1 O-023-0000 25-28-I 1 O-030-0000 25-28-I 1 O-031 -0000 25-28-I 1 O-032-0000 25-28-I 1 O-033-0000 25-28-I 1 O-043-0000 25-28-I 18-014-0000

Parcel Address

11946 S. Wallace St 610 W. 120th St 608 W. 120th St 602 W. 120th SL 600 W. 120th St 11741 S. Halsted St 11747 S. Halsted St 11749 S. Halsted St 11771 S. Halsted St.

12120      S. Union Ave.

12126      S. Union Ave.

12128 S. Union Ave.

12132 S. Union Ave.

12134 S. Union Ave.

12136 S. Union Ave.

12140 S. Union Ave.

12140 S. Union Ave.

12144 S. Union Ave.

12101 S. Union Ave.

12103 S. Union Ave.

12109 S. Union Ave.

12119 S. Union Ave.

12121      S. Union Ave.

12123 S. Union Ave.

12127      S. Union Ave.

12129 S. Union Ave.

121335 S. Union Ave.

12139 S. Union Ave.

12115 S. Union Ave.

12111 S. Union Ave. 657 W. 120th St. 653 W. 120th St 649 W. 120th St

1. S. Union Ave. 12055 S. Union Ave.

643 W. 120th St 639 W. 120th St 12020 S. Lowe Ave.

1. S. Lowe Ave. 12026 S. Lowe Ave. 12028 S. Lowe Ave. 12014 S. Lowe Ave. 12157 S. Union Ave.

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

IL

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

80628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

60628

City   State   Zip Code

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

Chicago

168

106208

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix C.

(To Amended  1 19^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

11 9"¹ And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Report.

The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether a portion of the City of Chicago identified as the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area qualifies for designation as a tax increment financing district within the definitions set forth under 65 ILCS 5/ 1 1-74.4 contained in the "Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act" (65 ILCS 5/1 1-74.1, et seq.), as amended (the "Act"). This legislation focuses on the elimination of blighted or rapidly deteriorating areas through the implementation of a redevelopment plan. The Act authorizes the use of tax increment revenues derived in a project area for the payment or reimbursement of eligible redevelopment project costs.

The area proposed for designation as the 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area is hereinafter referred to as the "Study Area" and is shown in Figure A.

The Study Area is approximately one hundred eighty-three ( 183) acres in size and includes eight hundred twenty-two (822) tax parcels, of which five hundred eighteen (5 18) parcels are improved, with three hundred ninety-four (394) of these parcels containing buildings. There are three hundred four (304) vacant parcels within the Study Area, which also include unused railroad right-of-way. It should be noted that the majority of vacant parcels are small lots scattered among improved property. Only three (3) vacant parcels exist under single ownership that are larger than five (5) acres in size. Two (2) of these parcels are part of the former railroad right-of-way that runs in a northwest to southeast direction through the Study Area. In addition to the three (3) larger sites, there are areas of vacant land comprised of individual vacant parcels under disparate ownership. However, only one (1) of these areas is larger than two (2) acres in size. Thus, while a significant amount of vacant land exists within the study area, it is scattered and under diverse ownership.

This report summarizes the analyses and findings of the consultant's work, which, unless otherwise noted, is solely the responsibility of Camiros, Ltd. and its subconsultants and does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of potential developers or the City of Chicago. However, the City of Chicago is entitled to rely on the findings and conclusions of this report in designating the Study Area as a redevelopment project area under the Act.

169

4/9/2003

106209

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

I.

Introduction.

The Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act permits municipalities to induce redevelopment of eligible "blighted", "conservation" or "industrial park conservation areas in accordance with an adopted redevelopment plan. The Act stipulates specific procedures, which must be adhered to, in designating a redevelopment project area. One of those procedures is the determination that the area meets the statutory eligibility requirements. At 65 Section 5/11-74.-3(p), the Act defines a "redevelopment project area" as:

*. . . an area designated by the municipality, which is not less in the aggregate than one and one-half (1%) acres and in respect to which the municipality has made a finding that there exist conditions which cause the area to be classified as an industrial park conservation area or a blighted area or a conservation area, or combination of both blighted areas and conservation areas".

In adopting this legislation, the Illinois General Assembly found:

1. (at 65 Section 5/ 1 l-74:4-2(a)) That there exists in many municipalities within the State blighted and conservation areas. . .; and
2. (at 65 Section 5/ 1 l-74.4-2(b)) That the eradication of blighted areas and the treatment and improvement of conservation areas by redevelopment projects are essential to the public interest.

The legislative findings were made on the basis that the presence of blight or conditions, which lead to blight, is detrimental to the safety, health, welfare and morals of the public. The Act specifies certain requirements, which must be met, before a municipality may proceed with implementing a redevelopment project in order to ensure that the exercise of these powers is proper and in the public interest.

Before the tax increment financing technique can be used, the municipality must first determine that the proposed redevelopment area qualifies for designation as a "blighted area, "conservation area" or an "industrial park conservation area". Based on the conditions present, this Eligibility Report finds that the Study Area qualifies for designation as a blighted area.

170

106210

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Blighted Areas.

If the property under consideration is improved, a combination of five (5) or more of the following thirteen (13) factors must be present for designation as a blighted area:

Dilapidation.

Obsolescence.

Deterioration.

Presence of structures below minimum code standards. Illegal use of individual structures. Excessive vacancies.

Lack of ventilation, light or sanitary facilities. Inadequate utilities.

Excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities.

Deleterious land-use or layout.

Lack of community planning.

Environmental clean-up requirements.

Declining or stagnant equalized assessed value.

If the property is vacant, a combination of two (2) or more of the following factors qualifies the area as blighted.

Obsolete platting of vacant land.

Diversity of ownership of vacant land.

Tax or special assessment delinquencies on such land.

Environmental clean-up requirements.

Declining or stagnant equalized assessed value.

171

4/9/2003

106211

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring areas adjacent to the vacant land.

Vacant property also qualifies as "blighted" if any one (1) of the following factors is present:

The area consists of an unused quarry or quarries.

The area consists of unused railyards, tracks or rights-of-way.

The area is subject to flooding.

The area consists of an unused disposal site containing debris from construction demolition, et cetera.

The area is between fifty (50) to one hundred (100) acres, seventy-five percent (75%) vacant, shows deleterious qualities and was designated as a town center before 1982, but not developed for that purpose.

The area qualified as blighted immediately before it became vacant.

The Act defines blighted areas, and recent amendments to the Act also provide guidance as to when the factors present qualify an area for such designation. Where any of the factors defined in the Act are found to be present in the Study Area, they must be: 1) documented to be present to a meaningful extent so that the municipality may reasonably find that the factor is clearly present within the intent of the Act, and 2) reasonably distributed throughout the Study Area.

The test of eligibility of the Study Area is based on the conditions of the area as a whole. The Act does not reqxiire that eligibility be established for each and every property in the Study Area.

2.

Eligibility  Studies And Analysis.

An analysis was undertaken to determine whether any or all of the blighting factors listed in the Act are present in the Study Area, and if so, to what extent and in which locations.

172

106212

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

In order to accomplish this evaluation, the following tasks were undertaken:

1. Exterior survey of the condition and use of each building.
   1. Field survey of environmental conditions involving parking facilities, public infrastructure, site access, fences and general property maintenance.
2. Analysis of existing land uses and their relationships.
3. Comparison of surveyed buildings to zoning regulations.
4. Analysis of the current platting, building size and layout.
5. Analysis of building floor area and site coverage.
   1. Review of previously prepared plans, studies, inspection reports and other data.
6. Analysis of real estate assessment data.
   1. Review of available building permit records to determine the level of development activity in the area.

10.       Review of building code violations.

The exterior building condition survey and site conditions survey of the Study Area were undertaken in April and May, 200 1. The analysis of site conditions was organized by tax block as shown in Figure B, with the corresponding existing land-use in Figure C.

Where a factor is described as being present to a major extent, the factor is present throughout significant portions of the Study Area. The presence of such conditions has a major adverse impact or influence on adjacent and nearby property, A factor described as being present to a minor extent indicates that the factor is present, but that the distribution of impact of the condition is more limited. A statement that the factor is not present indicates that either no information was available or that no evidence was documented as a result of the various surveys and analyses. Factors whose presence could not be determined with certainty were not considered in establishing eligibility.

Each factor identified in the Act for determining whether an area qualifies as a blighted area is discussed below and a conclusion is presented as to whether or not the factor is present in the Study Area to a degree sufficient to warrant its inclusion as a blighting factor in establishing the eligibility of the area as a "blighted area" under the Act. These findings describe the conditions that exist and the extent to

173

4/9/2003

106213

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

which each factor is present.

3.

Presence And Distribution Of Eligibility Factors.

The Act establishes different eligibility factors for improved property versus vacant land. Property within the Study Area consists primarily of developed property. Consequently, the character of property within the Study Area is predominantly improved.   For this reason, the analysis of eligibility was based, for the most part, on factors for improved property. Improved property includes parcels that contain buildings, structures, parking or other physical improvements. Improved property may include single parcels or multiple parcels under single or common ownership. Landscaped yards, open space or other ancillary functions may also be classified as improved property for the purposes of the eligibility analysis if they are obviously accessory to an adjacent building/primary use. Within the Study Area, only two (2) of the fifty-nine (59) tax blocks within the Study Area contained enough vacant property to warrant an analysis based on vacant property. Two (2) other tax blocks (25-20-2 10 and 25-28- 100) contained both vacant land and improved property. The vacant land portions of these two (2) blocks were evaluated as vacant land while the improved property portions were evaluated as improved property. Consequently, these two (2) tax blocks appear in the evaluation of both vacant land and improved property.   Separate analyses are provided for vacant and improved property.

In order to establish the eligibility of the improved property of a redevelopment project area under the "blighted" criteria established in the Act, at least five (5) of thirteen ( 13) eligibility factors must be meaningfully present and reasonably distributed  throughout  the  Study Area.    This eligibility study finds that the improved property within the Study Area qualifies for designation as "blighted". Eight (8) of the conditions cited in the Act are meaningfully present within the Study Area.    The six  (6)  conditions  present to a major extent are: deterioration, obsolescence, presence of structures below minimum code, excessive vacancies, excessive land coverage and overcrowding of community facilities and stagnant or declining E.A.V The two (2) conditions present to a minor extent are: dilapidation and deleterious land-use and layout.   All of these factors are well distributed throughout the Study Area.

In order to establish the eligibility of the vacant property of a redevelopment project area under the "blighted" criteria established in the Act, at least two (2) of six (6) eligibility factors must be meaningfully present and reasonably distributed throughout the Study Area. This eligibility study finds that the vacant property within the Study Area qualifies for designation as "blighted". Two (2) of the conditions cited in the Act are meaningfully present within the Study Area. These

174

106214

JOURNAL-CITY     COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

two (2) conditions are: obsolete platting and stagnant or declining E.A.V.

Improved Property.

Of the fifty-nine (59) tax blocks within the Study Area, fifty-seven (57) were comprised of improved property. While a significant number of vacant lots exist these blocks, the vacant lots are scattered among the improved property, and the overall character of these fifty-seven (57) tax blocks is of improved property. Two (2) of the tax blocks (Block 25-20-2 10 and Block 25-28-100) contain both sizeable areas of both improved and vacant property and are listed as both improved and vacant tax blocks for purposes of this analysis. Two (2) other blocks consist solely of improved property.

Factors Present To A Major Extent. Deterioration.

This condition is present when there are physical deficiencies in buildings or surface improvements requiring treatment or. repair. Any deficiency beyond normal maintenance qualifies as deterioration. Moderate levels of deterioration may be present in basically sound buildings that contain defects that can be corrected. More advanced deterioration that is not easily correctable and cannot be accomplished during the course of normal maintenance may also be evident. Advanced deterioration is clearly a greater blighting influence. Consequently, the incidence of advanced deterioration need not be widespread to qualify this condition as being present to a major extent. Examples of conditions that indicate deterioration include buildings that are not weather-tight, loose or missing materials, defects in exterior walls, rusted support beams and columns, and deteriorated roofs requiring replacement or major repair. Such defects may involve either primary building components (foundations, walls, roofs) or major defects in secondary building components (doors, windows, porches, fascia materials, gutters and downspouts). In terms of surface improvements, including sidewalks, off-street parking and surface storage areas, deterioration may take the form of surface cracking, loose paving material, depressions, streets with pitted pavement/potholes, crumbling curbs, crumbled or heaved sidewalks and pavement, and weeds protruding through paved surfaces.

Deterioration was found to be present within the Study Area to a major extent. With respect to building deterioration, one hundred nineteen (119) out of three hundred forty-seven (347) buildings, or thirty-four percent (34%), were found to be deteriorated. Evidence of deterioration included major cracks in masonry walls, window frames, doors and door frames requiring major repair or replacement, missing mortar requiring tuckpointing, and rusted gutters and downspouts.

175

4/9/2003

106215

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Of the fifty-seven (57) tax blocks of improved property within the Study Area, this factor was present to a major extent on forty-two (42) blocks and to a minor extent on two (2) blocks. Building deterioration is considered to be present to a major extent if deteriorated buildings account for at least twenty percent (20%) of the total number of buildings on the block. Deterioration to a major extent can also be present with a smaller proportion of deteriorated buildings combined with deteriorated site conditions and/or a preponderance of deferred building maintenance. Extensive deterioration of surface improvements and deferred building maintenance was also present. The forty-four (44) blocks affected by deterioration are evenly distributed within the Study Area.

Obsolescence.

Obsolescence refers to the condition, or process, of falling into disuse as evidenced by structures that have become ill-suited for their original use. Obsolescence is characterized by buildings designed for a single, or specific, purpose or use, buildings of inadequate size to accommodate alternative uses, or buildings using a type of construction that limits long term use and marketability. Site improvements such as water and sewer lines, public utility lines, roadways, parking areas, parking structures, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and lighting may be inadequate or obsolete in relation to contemporary standards for such improvements. Functional obsolescence includes poor design or layout, improper orientation of the building on the site, inadequate loading facilities, height or other factors that detract from the overall usefulness or desirability of the property. Inherently, functional obsolescence results in a loss of property value.

Obsolescence was found to be present to a major extent within the Study Area. Obsolescence is considered present to a major extent when more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the buildings on a block meet the definitions described in the preceding  paragraph.   Of the fifty-seven (57) tax blocks of improved property within the Study Area, this factor was present to a major extent on twenty-nine (29) blocks. A key condition that defines obsolescence in the Study Area is the decline of commercial viability along 1 19^th Street and 120^th Street. Several decades ago, these streets constituted a bustling business district. However, the market for commercial uses has long since shifted to other locations and these streets are no longer viable for commercial use. The zoning along 120^th Street was changed several years ago to residential use. Two (2) local planning documents, one (1) of which is the adopted  119^th And  Halsted  Redevelopment Area designation, call for 119^th Street to become a primarily residential street. The presence of buildings designed for commercial use on these streets is evidence of significant land-use obsolescence.

176

106216

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Presence Of Structures Below Minimum Code.

This factor is present when structures do not conform to local standards of building, fire, zoning, subdivision or other applicable governmental codes, but not including housing and property maintenance codes. Structures below minimum code standards include all buildings that do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, housing, fire, property maintenance or other governmental codes applicable to the property.  The principal purposes of such codes are to require that buildings be constructed in such a way that they can sustain the loads expected from the type of occupancy and are safe for occupancy against fire and similar hazards, and/or to establish minimum standards for safe and sanitary habitation.    Buildings below minimum code are characterized by defects or deficiencies that threaten health and safety.

This analysis focused on the issuance of building code violations over the course of the previous five (5) year period, based on data from the City of Chicago. This factor was determined to be present to a major extent when the number of violations equaled twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the buildings on the block.

Presence of structures below minimum code standards was found to be present within the Study Area to a major extent. From 1995 — 2000 there were one hundred twenty-two ( 122) code violations issued to property owners within the Study Area. Of the fifty-seven (57) tax blocks of improved property within the Study Area, this factor was present to major extent on thirty-two (32) blocks and to a minor extent on twenty-four (24) blocks.

Excessive Vacancies.

This condition is present when buildings are vacant, or partially vacant, such that they are underutilized and represent an adverse influence on the Study Area because of the frequency, extent or duration of the vacancies. Excessive vacancies can also be evidenced by vacant lots. The presence of buildings or sites which are unoccupied or underutilized generally signifies a lack of economic viability of the property and, by extension, of the surrounding area. Excessive vacancies include abandoned properties which evidence no apparent effort directed toward their occupancy or utilization. A relatively small amount of vacant property can affect the value and perceived viability of the surrounding area. Consequently, the presence of this condition would represent a significant blighting influence. This condition was considered to be present if the number of vacant properties represented twenty-five (25%) or more of the total parcels on the block.

Excessive vacancies were found to be present within the Study Area to a major extent. Fifty-six (56) buildings (or sixteen percent ( 16%)) were identified as vacant, partially vacant or underutilized.  Of the fifty-seven (57) tax blocks of improved property within the Study Area, this factor was present to major extent on thirty-

177

4/9/2003

106217

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

seven (37) blocks and to a minor extent on four (4) blocks.

Excessive Land Coverage And Overcrowding Of Structures And Community Facilities.

This factor refers to the over-intensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities onto a site. This condition is present when buildings occupy all, or most, of the lot, leaving little or no space for off-street parking, off-street loading and open space amenities. Problem conditions include buildings that are improperly situated on the parcel, the presence of multiple buildings on a single parcel, or buildings that are located on parcels of inadequate size and shape in relation to contemporary standards of development for health or safety. For there to be a finding of excessive land coverage, parcels must exhibit one (1) or more of the following conditions: insufficient provision for light and air within or around buildings, increased threat of the spread of fires due to the close proximity of nearby buildings, lack of adequate or proper access to a public right-of-way, lack of reasonably required off-street parking, or inadequate provision for loading and service. Excessive land coverage frequently has an adverse or blighting influence on nearby development.

While certain blocks are adversely affected by the buildings which cover too much of the lot, the more frequent problem is the lack of adequate or proper access to a public right-of-way. One (1) existing and one (1) former railroad right-of-way are present with the area. The former railroad right-of-way is currently vacant and has been acquired by the City of Chicago for future development as a bike trail. This former railroad right-of-way is aligned at an angle to the grid system of the area's streets. This alignment, combined with the platting of the lots, creates a situation in which many lots do not have adequate access to a public right-of-way.

This condition is present to a major extent throughout the Study Area. Overall, fifteen ( 15) of the fifty-seven (57) tax blocks of improved property within the Study Area were found to exhibit this condition to a major extent.   Most of these blocks were affected by inadequate access to a public right-of-way. The presence of the former railroad line obstructs access to both commercial and residential property. In some cases, access to property is provided only through an alley or half-street right-of-way. This severely restricts the use of the property and is a disincentive for investment and property maintenance.  A number of blocks along Halsted Street are affected, which as an arterial street, affects the viability of the entire area.

Declining Or Stagnant Equalized Assessed Value. This factor is present when one (1) of three (3) conditions is met within the Study

178

106218

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Area: 1) the total equalized assessed value (E.A.V.) has declined in three (3) of the last five (5) years; 2) the total E.A.V. is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three (3) of the last five (5) years; or 3) the total E.A.V. is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for three (3) of the last five (5) years.

Declining or stagnant equalized assessed values are indicative of economic and functional obsolescence. This condition relates to the lack of growth and private investment in an area resulting in economic and physical decline. Table A shows that the E.A.V. for the Study Area has either declined or grown at a lower rate than Chicago as a whole in four (4) of the last five (5) years.

Table A. Comparative  Increases  In E.A.V.

	2000	1999	1998	1997	1996
Property within the Study Area	$18,689,034 4.5%	$17,878,188 6.5%	$16,784,870 -1.7%	$17,073,159 8.1%	$15,799,509 -0.5%
City of Chicago	14.5%	4.2%	1.7%	8.4%	1.2%

Source: Cook County Tax Extension Office

Factors Present To A Minor Extent.

Deleterious  Land-Use  Or Layout.

This factor is characterized by inappropriate or incompatible land-use relationships, inappropriate mixed uses within buildings or uses considered to be noxious, offensive or unsuitable for the surrounding area.

Deleterious land-use or layout was found to be present within the Study Area to a minor extent. This factor was found to be present to a major extent on seven (7) of the fifty-seven (57) tax blocks of improved property within the Study Area. Two (2) of the blocks are affected by an unimproved area behind the Halsted Street frontage on the west side of the street north of 117^th Street. An unimproved

179

4/9/2003

106219

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

alley provides inadequate access to a truck terminal, a car wash/car repair operation and vacant land. The nature of the uses and the access characteristics have created a blighted area that is unmaintained and is used as an informal refuse site, with abandoned cars occasionally being deposited there. Four (4) other blocks contain car repair, auto body and/or salvage operation accompanied by poorly maintained outdoor storage areas that negatively affect surroundings property. The seventh (7^th) block contains a stone cutting shop that creates significant dust and noise, which also negatively affects adjacent property.

Dilapidation.

Dilapidation exists when buildings are in an advanced state of disrepair and neglect of necessary repairs to the primary structural components of buildings result in the necessity of major repairs or demolition.

Dilapidation exists to a minor extent within the Study Area.   Dilapidation was present to a major extent on eight (8) of the fifty-seven (57) tax blocks of improved property within the Study Area and to a minor extent on three (3) additional blocks.   Due to the blighting nature of dilapidation, this factor was considered present to a major extent if it represents ten percent (10%) or more of the buildings on a block.

Factors Found Not To Be Present.

Lack Of Community Planning.

This factor is present if the proposed redevelopment project area developed prior to, or without the benefit and guidance of, a community plan. This means that the area was developed prior to the adoption of a comprehensive or other community plan by the municipality or that the plan was not followed at the time of the area's development. The presence of this condition must be documented by evidence of adverse or incompatible land-use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels of inadequate shape and size to meet modern development standards, or other evidence demonstrating an absence of effective community planning.

This factor is also indicated when there are inadequate public utilities, or plans for  utility  improvements, that would allow the property to be developed in accordance with the intensity of use   identified   in   the municipality's comprehensive plan or zoning ordinance, or other economic development plans for the area. This factor is also present if public improvements serving the site,

180

106220

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

including streets, streetlights and other utility systems, do not meet current municipal standards. Similarly, lack of community planning is indicated if private improvements, including parking lots, screening and organization of buildings within the site, do not meet accepted community development standards.

This condition was found not to be present within the Study Area. While the Study Area may have benefited from more effective planning,  the primary problems of deterioration and vacant property are the result of lack of economic development rather than a lack of community planning.

Illegal Use Of Individual Structures.

This factor is present when structures are used in violation of federal, state or local laws. Exterior building and land-use surveys of the Study Area revealed no illegal land uses.

Factors Whose Presence Could Not Be Determined.

Lack Of. Ventilation, Light Or Sanitary Facilities.

Conditions, such as lack of indoor plumbing or lack of adequate windows or other means of providing ventilation or light, can negatively influence the health and welfare of a building's residents or users.    Typical  requirements for ventilation, light and sanitary facilities include:

Adequate mechanical ventilation for air circulation in rooms without windows, such as bathrooms, and dust, odor or smoke producing activity areas.

-» Adequate natural light and ventilation by means of skylights or windows for interior rooms with proper window sizes and amounts by room area to window area ratios.

Adequate sanitary facilities, including garbage storage, bathroom facilities, hot water and kitchens.

The presence of this factor could not be assessed through the exterior building condition survey and other available information to a degree sufficient to warrant its inclusion as a blighting factor present within the Study Area.

181

4/9/2003

106221

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Inadequate Utilities.

This factor exists in the absence of one (1) or more of the following utilities serving the site: gas, electricity, telephone, water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer or storm drainage. This factor is also present when the existing utilities are inadequate to accommodate the level of development permitted under current zoning or envisioned under the comprehensive plan, or adopted redevelopment plan, for the area.

This factor does not appear to be present within the Study Area since all property is presently served by the appropriate utilities. As it could not be determined with certainty, it is not considered to be a blighting factor present within the Study Area.

Environmental   Clean-Up Requirements.

This factor is considered present when property has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances or underground storage tanks required by state or federal law, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for such clean-up. In order for this eligibility factor to apply, the remediation costs must constitute a material impediment to the development, or redevelopment, of the redevelopment project area.

No existing environmental surveys were found that identify sites within the Study Area as environmentally contaminated. No such surveys were conducted as part of this study. Therefore, the presence of environmental contamination could not be determined.

Vacant Property.

Only four (4) tax blocks were considered vacant land within the Study Area. Two (2) of the tax blocks contained both improved property and significant vacant land, and have been evaluated both as vacant property and improved property. Two (2) other tax blocks were comprised of solely of vacant land. One (1) of these tax blocks is a single parcel approximately four thousand eight hundred (4,800) square feet in size. All four (4) of the tax blocks were found to exhibit at least two (2) of the six (6) factors needed to establish a blighted area finding under the Act.

182

106222

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Factors Found To Be Present. Obsolete Platting.

All four (4) tax blocks comprised of vacant land exhibit obsolete planing that results in parcels of narrow and irregular size and shape that are difficult to develop. All four (4) of these tax blocks are at least partially comprised of former railroad right-of-way property. This property is difficult to develop and obstructs access to adjacent property. The City of Chicago has acquired the former railroad right-of-way with the intent to develop a bike trail. A community plan entitled the South Halsted Street Corridor Plan, completed in June of 1999, recommends that portions of the proposed bike trail be realigned onto adjacent vacant property. The former railroad right-of-way property could then be added to proposed development parcels to minimize the impact of the former railroad right-of-way on potential development on Halsted Street. This recommendation is under consideration.

Diversity  Of Ownership.

One ( 1) of the four (4) tax blocks exhibits diversity of ownership that impedes the development of the property. The block in question has twenty-nine (29) separate parcels with ten ( 10) different owners.

Deterioration  On  Adjacent Property.

Three (3) of the four (4) tax blocks were found to be located adjacent to property exhibiting deterioration.

Declining Or Stagnant Equalized Assessed Value.

This factor is present when the total equalized assessed value of property within the proposed redevelopment project area has declined or has grown at a slower rate than the city as a whole. Table A, above, illustrates how the equalized assessed value of the property within the proposed redevelopment project area has not grown as rapidly as the city as a whole.

Factors Not Found To Be Present. Tax Or Special Assessment Delinquencies.

Information on tax or special assessment delinquencies was not collected to determine whether this factor is present within the Study Area.

183

106223

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Environmental   Clean-Up Requirements.

No existing environmental surveys were found that identify sites within the Study Area as having incurred either Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs or that environmental remediation was needed within the Study Area.

[Table "B" referred to in this Amended 1 19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Report constitutes Table "B" to the Amended 1 19^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan and Project and is printed on pages 106224 through  106225 of this Journal]

[Figure   "A" referred to in this Amended 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Report constitutes Appendix "A" — Figure 1 to the Amended 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan and Project and is printed on page 106 183 of this Journal]

[Figure   "B" referred to in this Amended 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Report printed on page 106226 of this Journal.]

[Figure "C referred to in this Amended 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Report constitutes Appendix "A" — Figure 3 to the Amended 119^th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan and Project and is printed on pages 106 185 through 106 187 of this Journal.]

184

06224

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Table "B".

(To Amended 119^th And  Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Study)

Improved Property. (Page 1 of 2)

Block            Blighting Factors

2

3

4

5

7

8

?

10

u

13

25-20-210

•

X

X

25-20-216

•

X

25-20-217

•

X

3lieh(ine Factors Leeend

25-20-226

•

X

1.      Dilapidation 2.      Obsolescence 3.      Deterioration ♦ . Pccsence. .of structures • below code standards 5. Illegal use of structures S. Excessive vacancies 7.      Lack of ventilation, light or sanitary facilities 8.      Inadequate utilities 9.      Excessive land coverage or overcrowding of community facilities 10.      Deleterious land use or layout 11.      Environmental contamination 12.      Lack of community , Dlannine

25-20-227

•

X

25-20-404

X

•

X

25-20-411

X

•

X

X

X

25-20-412

X

X

X

•

X

X

X

25-20-41R

X

X

X

x

X

X

X

25-20-420

X

X

♦

i

25-2(W21

OS

•

25-21-300

X

X

25-21-303

i

X

25-21-310

X

25-21-317

♦

X

25-21-320

•

X

X

25-21-327

x

X

x

X

25-21-328

X

x

X

X

X

25-21-329

X

X

X

X

25-21-330

X

X

•

X

X

25-21-331

X

x

X

X

X

25-21-332

X

X

X

X

X

.x

25-21-333

•

•

X

X 13- Declining or stagnant EA V

25-21-334

X

X

X

X

X

X

25-21-335

X

X

•

X

X

1-21-422

X

X

X

X

X

25-21-423

X

X

X

X

X

25-21-424

X

X

X-

X

X   -present to a major extent

25-21-425

X

«

xl 1

m

-orcsent to a minor extent

25-28-100

X

X

X 1 f

X

X

25-28-101

X

%X

A

X

X

75-78-in;

X

X

X

X

X

X

25-28-103

X

X

♦

X

X

25-28-104

•

X

X

X

X

X

25-28-105

X

X

X

X

X

25-28-106

X

X

•

X

25-28-107

X

X

X

X

X

25-28-108

X

X

X

X

X

X

25-28-109

X

X

X

X

X

X

25-28-110

*

X

X

X

X

X

25-28-111

X

X

X

X

X

X

106225

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Table "B".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Study)

Improved Property. (Page 2 of 2)

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
25-28-112	X	X	X			X			X				X
25-28-113	X	X	X	X		x			X				X
25-28-116			X	•		X							X
25-28-117	•	X	X	•		X			X				X
25-28-118	X	X	X	•		X			X	x			X
25-28-124			X	X		X							X
25-28-200	X	X	X	X		X							X
25-28-201		X	X	X		X							X
25-28-202		X	X	X		X							X
25-28-203		X	X	X		X							X
25-28-501				«									X
25-29-202			X	X		x							X
25-29-204			•	•		•							X
25-29-210			X	X		X							X
25-29-218				X		•			X				X
25-29-500				•									X
TOTAL- •	3	0	2	24	0	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	57
TOTAL-	8	29	42	32	0	37	0	0	15	7	0	0	57
GRAND
TOTAL	n	28	44	56	0	41	0	0	15	7	0	0	57

Distribution  Of Blighting Factors Vacant Land.

Block            Blighting Factors      

Il   12  13 14					5	6	Blighting Factors Legend
			I i				1.      Obsolete Platting 2.      Diversity of Ownership 3.      Tax Delinquencies 4.      Deterioration on Adjacent Properties 5.      Environmental Remediation 6.      Declining or stagnant EAV
25-20-210	X					X
25-20-422		X		X		X
25-21-500	X			X		X
25-28-100	X			X		X
TOTAL	3	1		3		4	x   • factor found to be present 1       1

186

JOURNAL--CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Figure "B".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Tax Blocks.

nuu- coOKcowrv

XU       HI «UJCH

UUi

187

106227

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.)  Of Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 1 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-20-21 O-043-0000	$67,697
25-20-21 O-037-0000	$1,848
25-20-21 O-038-0000	$4,171,364
25-20-216-037-0000	$883
25-20-217-031-0000	$9,606
25-20-217-032-0000	$19,142
25-20-217-033-0000	$19,142
25-20-226-001-0000	$22,738
25-20-226-002-0000	$21,421
25-20-226-003-0000	$9,608
25-20-226-004-0000	$19,607
25-20-226-005-0000	$16,835
25-20-226-006-0000	$19,224
25-20-226-007-0000	$15,760
25-20-226-008-0000	$13,450
25-20-226-009-0000	$13,450
25-20-226-010-0000	$13,450
25-20-226-011-0000	$15,882
25-20-226-016-0000	$56,010
25-20-227-016-0000	$4,465
25-20-227-035-0000	$38,289
25-20-404-001-0000	$160,821
25-20-404-007-0000	exempt
25-20-404-108-0000	exempt
25-2r>4W-rj2O-O00O	$14,755
25-20-404-021-0000	$15,042
25-20-404-022-0000	$32,639
25-20-404-023-0000	$32,841
25-20-404-024-0000	$32,843
25-20-404-025-0000	$31,847
25-20-404-042-0000	$178,274
25-20-404-043-0000	$31,018
25-20-404-044-0000	$33,353
25-20-404-045-0000                 1 $30,553

188

106228      JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 119* And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 2 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-20-404-046-0000	$33,650
26-20-404-O47.0000	S15.969
25-20-404-037-0000	$25,050
25-20-404-O38-O000	$21,508
25-20-404-039-0000	S172.515
25-20-404-040-0000	$178,033
25-20-404O41-0000	$20,948
25-20-404-107-0000	exempt
25-20-404-118-0000	$23,867
25-20-411-013O0CO	$6,128
25-20-412-001-0000	$118,261
25-2O-412-O02-O0O0	$5,259
25-20-412-003-0000	$5,259
25-20-412-004-0000	$5,259
25-20-412-006-0000	$5,127
25-20-412O07-0000	$5,381
25-20-412-008-0000	$5,381
25-20-412-012-0000	$56,170
25-20-412-013-0000	$47,614
25-20-412-014-0000	exempt
25-20-412-015-0000	exempt
25-20-412-016-0000	$13,706
25-20-412-017-0000	$14,362
25-20-412-018-0000	$24,614
25-20-412-019-0000	$28,167
25-20-412-020-0000	$248,143
25-20-412-021-0000	$82,567
25-20-412-022-OCOO	$49,375
25-20-418-034-0000	$79,310
25-20-418-035-0000	$47,556
25-20-418-036-0000	$12,854
25-20-418-037-0000	$3,068
25-20-418-038-0000	$1,799
25-20-418-039-0000	$4,952
25-20-418-048-0000	$21,477
25-20-418-049-0000	$21,844
25-20-418-050-0000	$194,692

189

4/9/2003

106229

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And  Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The U 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 3 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-20-418-051O000	$13,799
25-20-418-043-0000	exempt
25-20-418-025-0000	$1,910
25-20-418-O26-00O0	$1,910
25-20-418-027-0000	$1,910
25-20-418-028-0000	$3,072
25-20-418-029-0000	$1,910
25-20-418O30-0000	$1,910
25-20-418-031-0000	$9,361
25-20-418-032-0000	$59,250
26-20-418-033-0000	$3,197
25-20-418-023-0000	$37,370
25-20-418-024-0000	$2,121
25-20-422-013-0000	$84,362
25-20-422-014-0000	$50,747
25-2O-422-015-0000	$2,986
25-20-422-016O000	exempt
25-20-422O17O000	$602
25-20-422O1BO000	$4,371
25-20-422O19O000	$4,738
25-20-422O20-0000	$5,092
25-20-422O21O000	$5,434
25-20-422O22O000	$5,766
25-20-422O23O000	$6,077
25-20-422O24O000	$6,224
26-20-422O25O000	$12,398
25-20-422O26O000	$16,260
25-20-422027-0000	$3,224
25-20-422-0280000	$4,798
2S-20-422-029O000	$4,714
25-20-422-030O000	$3,553
25-20-422O31O000	$2,415
2S-20-422O32-0000	$2,659
25-20-422-033-0000	$37,524
25-20-422O34-0000	$39,718
25-20-422-035O000	$3,607
25-20-422-036-0000	$3,882
25-20-422-037-0000	$4,127
25-20-422O38-0000	$4,360

190

106230

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Append ix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The U 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 4 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-20-422O39O000	$129,056
25-20-422O40O000	$6,461
25-20-420-032-O000	exempt
25-20-420033-0000	exempt
25-20-420O34-0000	$3,867
25-20-420-035O000	$55,241
25-20-420O36O000	$7,856
25-20-421O33O000	exempt
25-20-421O34O000	$6,908
25-20-421O35O000	$12,061
25-20-421-036O000	exempt
25-20-t21O37O000	exempt
25-20-4210380000	exempt
25-20-421-039-0000	$2,971
25-20-421-0400000	$14,444
25-20-421-041-0000	exempt
25-28-111001-0000	exempt
25-28-1110020000	exempt
25-28-111O03O000	$4,027
25-28-111004-0000	exempt
25-28-111O05-0000	$2,417
25-28-111O06O000	$2,417
25-28-111O07O000	$1,759
25-28-111O08O000	$2,417
25-28-111009-0000	$2,417
25-28-111-0210000	exempt
25-28-111O22O000	exempt
25-28-111O23O000	$63,454
25-28-111O24O000	$4,582
25-28-111-025O000	$7,969
25-28-111-026-0000	$2,417
25-28-112001-0000	exempt
25-28-112O02-0000	$3,257
25-28-112003-0000	$12,956
25-28-112-004-0000	$2,417
25-28-112-005-0000	$2,417

191

106231

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 1 19^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.)  Of Property Within The 119^ And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 5 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-112-006-0000	$13,855
25-28-112-007-0000	$2,380
25-28-112-021-0000	$35,705
25-28-112-022-0000	$40,161
25-28-112-023-0000	$40,236
25-28-112-024-0000	$4,167
25-28-112-025-0000	$8,201
25-28-112-026-0000	$9,839
25-28-112-027-0000	$4,314
25-28-113-001-0000	exempt
25-28-113-002-0000	$27,780
25-28-113-003-0000	$5,759
25-28-113O04O000	$1,812
25-28-113O05O000	$7,494
25-28-113O06O000	$7,178
25-28-1130070000	$2,417
25-28-113O08O000	$13,608
25-28-113O09O000	exempt
25-28-113010-0000	$10,646
25-28-1130240000	$15,269
25-2B-113-025-0000	$1,759
25-28-113O26-00CO	$2,417
25-28-113027-0000	$2,417
25-28-113-0280000	$11,705
25-28-113O29O000	$2,417
25-21-328-001O000	$21,873
25-21-32BO02O000	$16,147
25-21-3280030000	$16,147
25-21-328O04-0000	$16,147
25-21-328-005-0000	$3,057
25-21-328-006O000	$3,057
25-21-328-011O000	$2,412
25-21-328O12-0000	$6,314
25-21-328O13-0000	exempt
25-21-328O14-0000	$3,362
25-21-328-015-0000	$3,362
25-21-328-016-0000	$17,106
25-21-328-020O000	$58,454

192

106232

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 6 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-21-328-019-0000	$5,439
25-21-329-035-0000	$4,249
25-21-329-038-0000	$2,959
25-21-329-037-0000	$402
25-21-329-038-0000	$16,970
25-21-329-039O000	$3,362
25-21-329-040-0000	$3,362
25-21-329-041-0000	$3,362
25-21-329O42-0000	$6,726
25-21-329O43O000	$3,362
25-21-329O44O000	$19,409
25-21-330O45O000	$27,118
25-21-330O37O000	$3,057
25-21-330O38O000	$12,770
75-?1-330-039O000	$18,924
25-21-330-040-0000	$5,939
25-21-330-041-0000	$5,939
25-21-330-0420000	$3,362
25-21-330O43-0000	exempt
25-21-330-044O000	$4,249
25-21-331O29O000	$105,885
25-21-331O30O000	$6,642
25-21-331031-0000	$6,124
25-21-331O32O000	$6,124
25-21-331O33O000	$12,251
25-21-331-034O000	exempt
25-21-331-035O000	exempt
25-21-331-036-0000	$4,254
25-29-202O01-0000	$1,271,717
25-29-202O04O000	$18,179
25-29-202O05O000	$53,353
25-29-202O06O000	$4,280
25-29-202O07O000	$15,669
25-29-202-008-0000	$11,638
25-29-202O09O000	$63,863
25-29-202-010-0000                  i $4,407

193

106233

4/9/2003

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 11 9"¹ And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 7 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-29-202O11O000	$19,302
25-20-204-030-0000	exempt
25-29-204-O29-O000	$19,751
25-29-204-019O000	$14,731
25-29-204-020-0000	$8,129
25-29-204-021O000	$8,220
25-29-204O22O000	$4,316
25-29-204O23O000	$10,642
25-29-204O24O000	$5,488
25-29-204O25-0000	$11,940
25-29-204O26O000	$15,436
25-20-204O05-0000	$1,977
25-29-210O42O000	$3,687
25-29-210O23O000	$4,149
25-29-210O24O000	$3,878
25-29-210-025O000	$13,212
25-29-2100260000	$2,235
25-29-210-027O000	$3,304
25-29-210-028O000	$12,0B2
25-29-210-029-0000	$11,892
25-29-210-030O000	$15,789
25-29-210O31O000	$2,203
25-29-210O32O000	$3,304
25-29-210O33-0000	$3,304
25-29-210O34O000	$10,751
25-29-210O35O000	$4,649
25-29-2100360000	$2,203
25-29-210O37-0000	$2,203
25-29-210O38O000	$10,326
25-29-210O39-0000	$17,048
25-29-210O40O000	$2,203
25-29-218-019-0000	$2,203
25-29-218-020-0000	$2,203
25-29-218-021-0000	54,845
Z5-29-2\B-022-0QQQ	$4,387
25-29-218-023-0000	$13,768
25-29-218-024-0000	513,768

194

106234

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO      4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.)  Of Property Within The 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 8 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-29-2180250000	$19,883
25-29-218-026-0000	$17,074
25-29-218-027-0000	$2,203
25-29-218O28O000	$2,203
25-29-218O29O000	$24,016
25-29-218O30-0000	$24,016
25-29-218O31O000	$24,016
25-29-218-032O000	$24,016
25-29-218-033O000	$24,016
25-29-218O34O000	$25,472
25-29-21BO35O000	$25,472
25-29-21BO36O000	$64,119
25-29-218O37O000	$2,753
25-29-218O38O000	$2,644
25-29-218O39O000	$43,071
25-28-124-001O000	$5,452
25-28-124O02O000	$63,786
25-28-124O03-0000	$12,327
25-28-124O04O000	$5,450
25-28-124O05O000	$2,461
25-28-124O06O000	$26,742
25-28-124O07O000	$4,389
25-28-124O0B-0000	$2,172
25-28-124-009O000	$2,172
25-28-1240100000	$2,172
25-28-124O11O000	$2,172
25-28-124-012O000	$2,172
25-28-124O13O000	$2,172
25-28-1240140000	$2,172
25-28-124O15O000	$2,172
25-28-124-016O000	$2,172
25-2B-124-017O000	$4,318
25-28-124O18O000	$2,052
25-28-124O19O000	$9,532
25-28-124O20-0000	$9,532
25-28-124-021-0000	$54,278
25-28-124-025-0000	$10,097
25-28-124O26O000	$10,162
25-28-124O27-0000	$11,209

195

106235

4/9/2003

REPORTS   OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And  Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 1 I  9^th And  Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 9 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-124O28-0000	$8,419
25-28-124-029-0000	$6,964
25-28-124-030-0000	$2,417
25-28-124-031-0000	$7,387
25-28-124-032-0000	S2.417
25-28-124-033-0000	$7,211
25-28-124-034O000	$12,865
25-28-124O35O000	$15,754
25-28-124-036O000	$10,629
25-28-124O37O000	$16,930
25-28-124O38O000	$13,341
25-28-124O39O000	$6,837
25-28-124O40O000	$11,475
25-28-124O41O000	$1,979
25-28-1240420000	$16,096
25-28-124O43-0000	$4,556
25-28-124O44O000	$71,154
25-28-124O45O000	$74,985
25-28-108O01O000	$37,030
25-28-1080020000	$39,127
25-28-108O03-0000	$33,626
25-20-108004-0000	$2,046
25-28-108-005O000	$1,943
25-28-108O06O000	$2,066
25-28-108O07O000	$2,066
25-28-108O08-0000	$2,066
25-28-108O09O000	$14,399
25-28-108O10O000	$2,341
25-28-108O14O000	$1,943
25-28-108O15O000	$3,889
25-28-108O16O000	$1,943
25-28-108O17O000	$1,943
25-28-108-018-0000	$1,943
25-28-108-019O000	$4,276
25-28-108-020O000	exempt
25-28-I 08-021-0000	$5,336
25-28-1 08-022-0000	$1,648
25-28-1 08-023-0000	$15,658
25-28-108-024-0000	$13,614

196

I ■ ji

106236

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed Value (E.A.V.) Of   Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 10 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-108-025-0000	$2,090
25-28-108-026-0000	$2,706
25-28-108-027-0000	$2,397
25-28-108-028-0000	$2,255
25-28-108-029-0000	$2,397
25-28-108-030-0000	$1,743
25-28-108-031-0000	$4,734
25-28-108O32-0000	$12,629
25-28-108O33O000	$2,397
25-28-108-034-0000	$2,746
25-28-108-035-0000	$2,255
25-28-108-036-0000	$13,950
25-28-108-037-0000	$12,196
25-28-108-038-0000	$2,255
25-28-108-0390000	$2,255
25-2B-108-040O000	$1,272
25-28-108-041O000	$3,500
25-28-108O42O000	$21,299
25-28-109O02O000	$1,657
25-28-109O03-0000	$4,336
25-28-109O04O000	$2,292
25-28-109O05-0000	S2.446
25-28-109-006O000	exempt
25-28-109-007O000	exempt
25-28-109-008O000	exempt
25-28-1090090000	exempt
25-28-109O11O000	$3,987
25-28-109O10O000	$20,129
25-28-109O12O000	$4,187
25-28-109O13O000	$2,417
25-28-109O17-0000	$12,383
25-28-109O18O000	$12,727
25-28-109-019-0000	$17,641
25-28-109-020O000	$18,371
25-28-109-021-0000	$4,360
25-28-109O22O000	$21,121
25-28-109O23-0000	$2,050
25-28-109024-0000	$2,673
25-28-109-025-0000	$29,606

197

4/9/2003

106237

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Append ix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed Value (E.A. V.) Of Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 11 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-109-028-0000	S25.544
25-28-109-027O000	$13,621
25-28-109001-0000	exempt
25-28-116O01-0000	$2,608
25-28-116O02O000	$15,327
25-28-1160030000	$17,414
25-28-1160040000	$2,172
25-28-1160050000	$2,172
25-28-1160060000	$16,116
25-28-116O07O000	$2,172
25-28-116O08O000	$2,172
25-28-116O09O000	$2,172
25-28-116O10O000	$13,728
25-28-116O11O000	$2,172
25-28-116O12-0000	$2,172
25-28-116O13O000	$3,518
25-28-116O14O000	$2,295
25-28-116O15-0000	$2,295
25-26-116O16-0000	$2,295
25-2B-1160170000	$36,703
25-28-116O18O000	$6,088
25-28-116-019O000	$2,295
25-28-116O20O000	$2,275
25-28-116-021O000	$2,441
25-28-116-022-0000	$15,111
25-28-116O23O000	$2,052
25-28-116O46O000	$11,438
25-28-116-026O000	$10,051
25-28-116O44O000	$15,427
25-28-116045-0000	$12,948
25-28-1160380000	$12,907
25-28-116042-0000	$10,962
25-28-116O43-0000	$17,679
25-28-1160310000	$15,187
25-28-116O32O000	$14,517
25-28-116-033-0000	$15,322
25-28-116O34O000	$10,897
25-28-116O35-0000	$1,465
25-28-116O36O000	$16,727

198

106238

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To  Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.)  Of Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 12 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-116-037-0000	S1.858
25-28-116-038-0000	$12,907
25-28-116-039-0000	$2,417
25-28-1160400000	$16,914
25-28-116-041-O000	$12,674
25-21-300-024-0000	$247,142
25-21-300-029-0000	$196,186
25-21-303O30O000	$1,165,908
25-21-310-001O000	$42,075
25-21-310O02O000	$39,707
25-21-310O03O000	$40,803
25-21-310O04O000	$52,853
25-21-310O05O000	$113,096
25-21-310O06O000	$105,896
25-21-317O22O000	$512,492
25-21-327O01O000	exempt
25-21-327O02O000	exempt
25-21-327O03O000	$6,253
25-21-327O04O000	$21,479
25-21-327O05-0000	$14,499
25-21-327O06O000	$14,499
25-21-327O07-0000	$14,499
25-21-327-008O000	$14,499
25-21-327O09O000	$30,673
25-21-327O10O000	$25,895
25-21-332-029O000	$10,264
25-21-332-030O000	$63,001
25-21-332-031O000	$51,630
25-21-332-032-0000	$41,671
25-21-332O33-0000	$3,976
25-21-333O38O000	$458,597
25-21-334O33O000	$7,515

199

4/9/2003

106239

REPORTS  OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And  Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 11 9"¹ And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 13 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-21-334-025-0000	$3,315
25-21-334-026-0000	$3,315
25-21-334-O27-0000	$14,388
25-21-334-028-0000	$2,410
25-21-334-029-0000	$2,410
25-21-334-030-0000	$3,876
25-21-334-031-0000	$8,273
25-21-334-032-0000	$10,384
25-21-335-024-0000	$14,228
25-21-335-025-0000	$13,632
25-21-335-026O000	$10,206
25-21-335-027-0000	$11542
25-21-335-028-0000	S7.093
25-21-335-029-0000	$10206
25-21-335-030-0000	$3,093
25-21-335-031-0000	$11,080
25-21-335-032-0000	$8,501
25-21-422-021-0000	S29.94B
25-21-422-022-0000	$2,521
25-21-422-023-0000	$8,441
25-21-422-024-0000	$49,019
25-21-422-025-0000	$2,521
25-21-422-026-0000	$2,521
25-21-422-027-0000	$41,017
25-21-423-039-0000	exempt
25-21-423-040-0000	exempt
25-21-424-028-0000	$15,809
25-21-424-033-O0O0	$4,280
25-21-424-034-0000	. $9,130
25-21-424-035-0000	$14,542
25-21-424-036-0000	$13,855
25-21-424-037-0000	$15,536
25-21-425-038-0000	$2,446
25-21-425-039-0000	$18,533
25-21-425-029-0000	$1,556

200

106240

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To  Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 14 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-21-425-030-0000	$1,556
25-21-425-031-0000	$16,682
25-21-425O32O000	$6,508
25-21-425-033-0000	$12,114
25-21-425-034-0000	$9,514
25-21-425-035-0000	$2,139
25-21-425-036-0000	$9,528
25-2B-200O01O000	$43,360
25-28-200-002-0000	$46,710
25-28-200O03-0000	$5,801
25-28-200-004-0000	$5,810
25-28-200O05-0000	$3,008
25-28-200O06O000	$3,008
25-28-200O07O000	$2,186
25-28-200O08O000	$2,188
25-28-200O09O000	$42,969
25-28-201O01O000	$3,800
25-28-201O02O000	$3,008
25-28-201O03O000	$29,139
25-28-201O04-0000	$15,978
25-28-20100SO000	$19,364
25-28-201O06O000	$3,131
25-28-201-007O000	$3,131
25-28-201O08O000	$3,131
25-28-201-009-0000	$3,008
25-28-201-01 0O000	$3,800
25-28-202-001-0000	exempt
25-28-202-002-0000	$9,027
25-28-202-003-0000	$25,361
25-28-202-004-0000	$16,598
25-28-203-001-0000	$3,776
25-28-203-002-0000	$13,750
25-28-203-003-0000	$3,008
25-28-203-004-0000	$3,008
25-28-203-005-0000	$3,008
25-28-203-006-0000	$13,116

201

106241

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "D".

(To Amended  119^th And  Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 15 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-2B-203O07O000	$3,008
25-28-2O3-O08-CO00	$3,008
25-28-203-009-0000	$53,282
25-28-104.001-0000	$30,549
25-28-104-002-0000	$29,919
25-28-104-003-0000	exempt
25-28-104-004-0000	exempt
25-28-104-005-0000	$7,662
25-28-104-006-0000	$11,382
25-28-104-007-0000	$2,188
25-28-104-008-0000	$2,764
25-28-104-009-0000	$14,033
25-28-104-010-0000	$12,763
25-28-104-011-0000	$16,481
25-28-104-012-0000	$6,622
25-28-104-013-0000	$2,430
25-28-104-014O000	$6522
25-28-104-015-0000	$9,008
25-28-104-016-0000	$8,066
25-28-104-017-0000	$15,420
25-28-104-018-0000	$17,010
25-28-104-019-0000	$8,868
25-28-104-020-0000	$11,396
25-28-104-021-0000	$6,762
25-28-104.022-0000	$7,149
25-28-104-023-0000	$9,541
25-28-104-024-0000	$3,364
25-28-104-025-0000	exempt
25-28-104-026-0000	$1,681
25-28-104-027-0000	exempt
25-28-104028-0000	$12,979
25-28-104-029O000	$11,302
25-28-104O30O000	exempt
25-28-104-031-0000	$2,430
25-28-104O32O000	$2,430
25-2B-104O33O000	$3,207
25-28-104O34-0000	S3.647
25-28-104O35-0000	$9,926
25-28-104-036-0000	$6,433

202

106242      JOURNAL-CITY     COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To  Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 16 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-26-104-037-0000	$7,551
25-264 04-038-0000	$6,869
25-28-1 04-039-0000	$2,644
25-28-1 04-040-0000	$14,826
25-28-1 04-041-0000	$14,119
25-28-1 04-042-0000	$12,585
25-28-1 04-043-0000	$15,251
25-28-104-044-0000	$1,681
25-28-I 05-001-0000	$17,117
25-28-1 05-002-0000	$4,583
25-28-105-003-0000	$37,948
25-28-I 05-004-0000	$2,188
25-28-I 05-005-0000	$2,188
25-28-I 05-006-0000	$2,188
25-28-105-007-0000	$2,188
25-28-105-008-0000	exempt
25-28-105-009-0000	exempt
25-28-106-001-0000	exempt
25-2B-106-002-0000	exempt
25-28-106-003-0000	exempt
25-28-106-004-0000	exempt
25-28-106-O05-O000	exempt
25-28-106-006-0000	exempt
25-28-106-007-0000	exempt
25-28-106-008-0000	$99,224
25-28-107-007-0000	$2,188
25-28-107-008-0000	$2,188
25-28-107-009-0000	$42,513
25-28-107-039-0000	$13,152
25-28-107-040-0000	$16,365
25-28-100-006-0000	$294
25-28-100-017-0000	$8,016
25-28-100-013-0000	$2,108
25-28-100-019-0000	$6,150
25-28-100-018-0000	$5,494
25-28-100-015-0000	$5,032

203

106243

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Append ix "D°.

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted  Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial  Equalized Assessed Value (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 11 9^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 17 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-100016-0000	$79,332
25-28-100-011-0000	$79,628
25-28-100-002-0000	$12,460
25-28-100-001 -0000	$1,728
25-28-100-007O000	$825
25-28-100-0080000	$1,468
25-28-100O09O000	$4,234
25-28-101O01O000	$15,576
25-28-101O02O000	$12,416
25-28-101O03O000	$18,035
25-28-1010040000	$6,037
25-28-101O05O000	$2,172
25-28-101O06O000	$4,725
25-28-101O07O000	$20216
25-28-101O08O000	$20,714
25-28-101-0090000	$20216
25-28-101O11O000	$18,093
25-28-101O12O000	$2,417
25-28-101O13O000	$25,295
25-28-101O14O000	$8,236
25-28-101-0150000	$8,236
25-28-101O16O000	$2,417
2S-28-101O17O000	$2,417
25-28-101-018-0000	$2,379
25-28-101O19O000	$20,498
25-28-101 ■0200000	$1,979
25-28-101-0210000	$15,278
25-28-101-025O000	exempt
25-28-101O26O000	$7,255
25-28-101O27O000	$2,417
25-28-101O28O000	$2,417
25-28-101O29O000	$2,417
25-28-101O30O000	$2,417
25-28-101O31O000	$14,139
25-28-101O32-0000	$2,417
25-28-101O33-0000	exempt
25-28-101O34-0000	$2,175
25-28-101O35-0000	$10,424
25-28-101-038-0000	$2,168

204

106244

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.)  Of Property Within The 11 9** And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 18 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-101-039-0000	$14.484
25-28-101-040-0000	exempt
25-28-101-042-0000	$1,490
25-28-101-041-0000	$1,874
25-28-101-022-0000	$1,759
25-28-101-023-0000	$1,759
25-28-101-024-0000	$1,759
25-28-101-038-0000	$2,417
25-28-101-037-0000	$2,417
25-28-102-001-0000	$4,901
25-28-102-002-0000	$2,172
25-28-102-003-0000	$2,172
25-28-102-004-0000	$2,172
25-28-102-005-0000	$19,667
25-28-102-006-0000	$23,024
25-28-102-O07O000	$14,364
25-28-102-008-0000	$17,309
25-28-102-009-0000	$9,986
25-28-102-010-0000	S7.936
25-28-102-011-0000	$13,405
25-28-102-012-0000	$2,257
25-28-102-013-OO00	$2,417
25-28-102-014-0000	$2,417
25-28-102-015-0000	$14,624
25-28-102-016-0000	$2,417
25-28-102-017-0000	$3,627
25-28-102-018-0000	$3,627
25-28-102019-0000	exempt
25-28-102O20O000	exempt
25-28-102-021O000	exempt
25-28-102O22O000	$2,083
25-28-102O23-0000	$5,152
25-28-102O24-0000	$11,246
25-28-102-025-0000	$7,907
25-28-102-026-0000	$7,514
25-28-102-027-0000	$9,252
25-28-102-028-0000	$10,971
25-28-102O29-0000	$11,387
25-28-102-030-0000	$15,324

205

106245

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Append be "D".

(To Amended 119* And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 11 9* And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 19 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-26-102-031-0000	$12,207
25-28-102-034-0000	$8,616
25-28-102-035-0000	$2,417
25-28-102-036O000	$4,182
25-28-102-037-0000	$2,417
25-28-102-O38-OO00	$2,083
25-26-102-039-0000	$12,178
25-28-102-040-0000	$2,842
25-28-102-041 -0000	exempt
25-28-102-042-0000	$14,046
25-28-103-001-0000	$42,716
25-28-103-002-0000	$33,586
25-28-103-003-0000	$3,478
25-2B-103-004-0000	$3,613
25-28-103-005-0000	$3,478
25-28-103O06O000	$2,172
25-28-103-007-0000	$22,520
25-28-103-008-0000	$16,240
25-28-103-009-0000	exempt
25-28-103-010-0000	$14,248
25-28-103-011-0000	$10,673
25-28-103-013-0000	$16,529
25-28-103-014-0000	$16,529
25-28-103-015-0000	$1,383
25-28-103O16-0000	$14,295
25-28-103O17O000	$9,915
25-28-103O18O000	$2,430
25-28-103O19O000	$13,086
25-28-103O20-0000	$2,248
25-28-103O21O000	$4,772
25-28-103O22O000	exempt
25-28-103O23O000	exempt
25-28-103O24O000	exempt
25-28-103O25O000	$18,555
25-28-103026-0000	exempt
25-2B-103O27O000	exempt
25-28-103O28-0000	$10,989
25-28-103O29-0000	$10,573
25-28-103O30O000	$26,633

206

106246

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.) Of Property Within The 119^ And  Halsted Redevelopment  Project Area. (Page 20 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-1030310000	$4,529
25-28-103-032-0000	$14,691
25-28-103-033-0000	$2,430
25-28-103-034-0000	$16,443
25-28-103-035-0000	$2,430
25-28-103-036-0000	$11,916
25-28-103-037-0000	$10,767
25-28-103O38-0000	$7,786
25-28-103O39O000	$2,650
25-28-103-040O000	exempt
25-28-103O41O000	exempt
25-28-103O42O000	$2,026
25-28-103O43O000	$2,083
25-28-103O44O000	exempt
25-28-103O45O000	$23,696
25-28-103-046O000	$16,334
25-21-3200010000	$6,675
25-21-320O02O000	$14,869
25-21-3200030000	$4,836
25-21-320O04O000	$4,636
25-21-320O07O000	$16,423
25-21-320O28O000	$17,537
25-21-320O29O000	$11,678
25-21-320O30-0000	$14,597
25-21-320-031-0000	$5232
25-28-117O01O000	$15,738
25-28-117O02O000	$11,759
25-28-117O03O000	$14,677
25-28-117O04-0000	$10,177
25-28-117-0050000	$9,919
25-28-117O06O000	$13,166
25-28-117-007O000	$8,026
25-28-117-008O000	$12,365
25-28-117-009O000	$16,416
25-28-117-010-0000	$9,446
25-28-117O14O000	$12,896
25-28-117015-0000	$8,881
25-28-117O16-0000	$8,221

207

106247

4/9/2003

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed  Value  (E.A.V.)  Of Property Within The 11 9* And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 21 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-117-017-0000	$3,911
25-28-117-018-0000	$20,747
25-28-117-019-0000	$9,032
25-28-117-021-0000	$2,557
25-28-117-022-0000	$3,787
25-28-117-023-0000	$4,051
25-28-117-024-0000	$9,750
25-28-117-025-0000	$1,576
25-28-117-026-0000	$3,011
25-28-117O27O000	£12.378
25-28-1170280000	$2,246
25-28-117O29O000	$2,401
25-28-117O30O000	$12,496
25-28-117-035O000	$16,854
25-28-117O36O000	$20,799
25-28-117-037O000	$15,087
25-28-117O38O000	$17,457
25-28-116O01O000	$2,730
25-28-118O02O000	$2255
25-28-118O03O000	$2255
25-28-118-007-0000	$2,128
25-28-118-008-0000	$2,072
25-28-118O09-0000	$1,834
25-28-118O10O000	$3,558
25-28-118011-0000	$1,321
25-28-118-016O000	$2,417
25-28-118O13-0000	$3,758
25-28-118O34O000	$3,391
25-28-118O35O000	$3,384
25-28-I 1 0-001 -0000	exempt
25-28-I 10-002-0000	$1,952
25-28-I 1 0-003-0000	$4,167
25-28-1  1 0-004-0000	$15,994
25-28-1 1 0-005-0000	$11,356
25-28-1 1 0-006-0000	$10,533
25-28-1  1 0-007-0000	exempt
25-28-I  1 0-008-0000	$2,417
25-28-1  1 0-009-0000	$12,661

208

106248

JOURNAL-CITY    COUNCIL-CHICAGO 4/9/2003

Appendix "D".

(To Amended 119^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Initial Equalized Assessed Value (EA.  V.) Of Property Within The I 19^th And Halsted Redevelopment Project Area. (Page 22 of 22)

Property Identification Number	2000 EAV
25-28-110-010O000	$15,320
25-28-110-011-0000	$15,295
25-28-110-012-0000	$8,125
25-28-110-013-0000	$2,417
25-28-110-014-0000	$11,442
25-28-110-015-0000	$16,367
25-28-110-016-0000	$16,394
25-28-110-0170000	$12,305
25-28-110-018-0000	$11,351
25-28-110-019-0000	$14,388
25-28-110-020-0000	$2235
25-28-110-021-0000	$1,952
25-28-110-022-O000	$6,270
25-28-110-023-0000	exempt
25-28-110-024-0000	exempt
25-28-110-030-0000	$2,417
25-28-110-031-0000	$2,417
25-28-110-032-0000	$2,417
25-28-110-033-0000	$2,417
25-28-110-034-0000	$13,001
25-28-110O35-0000	$14,464
25-28-110-036O000	$12,732
25-28-110-037-0000	$9,621
25-28-110O38O000	$3224
25-28-110-039O000	$14,348
25-28-110-0400000	$11215
25-28-110O41O000	$8,175
25-28-110-042O000	$13,650
25-28-110-043O000	$3,627
25-28-110-044O000	$14,146
25-28-110O45O000	exempt
25-20-210-022O000	$24,343
25-20-210-044O000	$192,884
25-29-500-008O000	exempt
25-28-501-003O000	exempt
25-28-118-014-0000	$298
Total	$18,689,034

209

I

EXHIBIT B Commission Resolution See Attached.

210

STATE OF ILLINOIS)

)SS

COUNTY OF COOK )

CERTIFICATE

I, Robert Wolf, the duly authorized and qualified Assistant Secretary of the Community Development Commission of the City of Chicago, and the custodian of the records thereof, do hereby certify that I have compared the attached copy of a Resolution adopted by the Community Development Commission of the City of Chicago at a Regular Meeting held on the 11^th Day of March 2014 with the original resolution adopted at said meeting and noted in the minutes of the Commission, and do hereby certify that said copy is a true, correct and complete transcript of said Resolution.

 

ASSISTANT SECRETARY Robert Wolf

Dated this ll^M,Day of March 2014

211

14-CDC-9

J. TIF Area Designation: CDC Form2b-iecomml 11904

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

RESOLUTION /KcDC- M

RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO FOR THE PROPOSED 119TH AND HALSTED AMENDMENT NO. 2 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA:

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT

WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission (the "Commission") of the City of Chicago (the "City") has heretofore been appointed by the Mayor of the City with the approval of its City Council ("City Council," referred to herein collectively with the Mayor as the "Corporate Authorities") (as codified in Section 2-124 of the City's Municipal Code) pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, as amended (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seg.) (the "Act"); and

WHEREAS, the Commission is empowered by the Corporate Authorities to exercise certain powers set forth in Section 5/1 l-74.4-4(k) of the Act, including the holding of certain public hearings required by the Act; and

WHEREAS, staff of the City's Department of Planning and Development has conducted or caused to be conducted certain investigations, studies and surveys of the 119th and Halsted Redevelopment Project Area Amendment No. 2 the street boundaries of which are described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Area"), to determine the eligibility of the Area as a redevelopment project area as defined in the Act (a "Redevelopment Project Area") and for tax increment allocation financing pursuant to the Act ("Tax Increment Allocation Financing"), and previously has presented the following documents to the Commission for its review:

119th and Halsted Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No. 2 (the "Plan"); and

WHEREAS, prior to the adoption by the Corporate Authorities of ordinances approving a redevelopment plan, designating an area as a Redevelopment Project Area or adopting Tax Increment Allocation Financing for an area, it is necessary that the Commission hold a public hearing (the "Hearing") pursuant to Section 5/1 l-74.4-5(a) of the Act, convene a meeting of a joint review board (the "Board") pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-5(b) of the Act, set the dates of such Hearing and Board meeting and give notice thereof pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-6 of the Act; and

212

J. TIF Area Designation: CDC Form2b-recomml 11904

WHEREAS, a public meeting (the "Public Meeting") was held in accordance and in compliance with the requirements of Section 5/1 l-74.4-6(e) of the Act, on October 17, 2014 at 6:00 pm at the Sheldon Heights Church, 11325 South Halsted Street, Chicago, Illinois, (this date being more than 14 business days before the scheduled mailing of the notice of the Hearing [hereinafter defined], as specified in the Act), pursuant to notice from the City's Commissioner of the Department of Planning and Development, given on October 2,2014, (this date being more than 15 days before the date of the Public Meeting, as specified in the Act), by certified mail to all taxing districts having real property in the proposed Area and to all entities requesting that information that have taken the steps necessary to register to be included on the interested parties registry for the proposed Area in accordance with Section 5/11-74.4-4.2 of the Act and, with a good faith effort, by regular mail, to all residents and to the last known persons who paid property taxes on real estate in the proposed Area (which good faith effort was satisfied by such notice being mailed to each residential address and to the person or persons in whose name property taxes were paid on real property for the last preceding year located in the proposed Area); and

WHEREAS, the Report and Plan were made available for public inspection and review since January 3, 2014, being a date not less than 10 days before the Commission meeting at which the Commission adopted Resolution 14-CDC-01 on January 14,2014 fixing the time and place for the Hearing, at City Hall, 121 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, in the following offices: City Clerk, Room 107 and Department of Planning and Development, Room 1000; and

WHEREAS, notice of the availability of the Report and Plan, including how to obtain this information, were sent by mail on January 21, 2014 which is within a reasonable time after the adoption by the Commission of Resolution 14-CDC 01 to: (a) all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, were determined to be (i) located within the Area and (ii) located outside the proposed Area and within 750 feet of the boundaries of the Area (or, if applicable, were determined to be the 750 residential addresses that were outside the proposed Area and closest to the boundaries of the Area); and (b) organizations and residents that were registered interested parties for such Area; and

WHEREAS, notice of the Hearing by publication was given at least twice, the first publication being on February 11,' 2014 a date which is not more than 30 nor less than 10 days prior to the Hearing, and the second publication being on February 18,2014, in the Chicago Sun-Times, being newspapers of general circulation within the taxing districts having property in the Area; and

WHEREAS, notice of the Hearing was given by mail to taxpayers by depositing such notice in the United States mail by certified mail addressed to the persons in whose names the general taxes for the last preceding year were paid on each lot, block, tract or parcel of land lying within the Area, on February 11,2014, being a date not less than 10 days prior to the date set for the Hearing; and where

2

213

). TIF Area Designation: CDC Form2b-recomHiI 11904

taxes for the last preceding year were not paid, notice was also mailed to the persons last listed on the tax rolls as the owners of such property within the preceding three years; and

WHEREAS, notice of the Hearing was given by mail to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity ("DECO") and members of the Board (including notice of the convening of the Board), by depositing such notice in the United States mail by certified mail addressed to DECO and all Board members, on January 17,2014, being a date not less than 45 days prior to the date set for the Hearing; and

WHEREAS, notice of the Hearing and copies of the Report and Plan were sent by mail to taxing districts having taxable property in the Area, by depositing such notice and documents in the United States mail by certified mail addressed to all taxing districts having taxable property within the Area, on January 21,2014, being a date not less than 45 days prior to the date set for the Hearing; and

WHEREAS, the Hearing was held on March 11,2014at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, 2^nd Floor, 121 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, as the official public hearing, and testimony was heard from all interested persons or representatives of any affected taxing district present at the Hearing and wishing to testify, concerning the Commission's recommendation to City Council regarding approval of the Plan, designation of the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area; and

WHEREAS, the Board meeting was convened on February 7,2014 at 10:00 a.m. (being a date at least 14 days but not more than 28 days after the date of the mailing of the notice to the taxing districts on January 17,2014 in Room 1003A, City Hall, 121 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, to review the matters properly coming before the Board to allow it to provide its advisory recommendation regarding the approval of the Plan, designation of the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area, adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area and other matters, if any, properly before it, all in accordance with Section 5/1 l-74.4-5(b) of the Act; and

WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the Report and Plan, considered testimony from the Hearing, if any, the recommendation of the Board, if any, and such other matters or studies as the Commission deemed necessary or appropriate in making the findings set forth herein and formulating its decision whether to recommend to City Council approval of the Plan, designation of the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO:

Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

3

214

J. TIF Area Designation. CDC Fonn2b-recomm! 11904

Section 2. The Commission hereby makes the following findings pursuant to Section 5/1 l-74.4-3(n) of the Act or such other section as is referenced herein:

a.      The Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through

investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be expected to be developed

without the adoption of the Plan;

1. The Plan:

1. 1. 1. conforms to the comprehensive plan for the development of the City as a whole; or
      2. the Plan either (A) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the Chicago Plan Commission or (B) includes land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission;
   2. The Plan meets all of the requirements of a redevelopment plan as defined in the Act and, as set forth in the Plan, the estimated date of completion of the projects described therein and retirement of all obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs is not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in subsection (b) of Section 5/11-74.4-8 of the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year following the year of the adoption of the ordinance approving the designation of the Area as a redevelopment project area and, as required pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-7 of the Act, no such obligation shall have a maturity date greater than 20 years;
   3. To the extent required by Section 5/1 l-74.4-3(n) (6) of the Act, the Plan incorporates the housing impact study, if such study is required by Section 5/1 l-74.4-3(n)(5) of the Act;
   4. The Plan will not result in displacement of residents from inhabited units.
2. The Area includes only those contiguous parcels of real property and improvements thereon that are to be substantially benefited by proposed Plan improvements, as required pursuant to Section 5/1 l-74.4-4(a) of the Act;
3. As required pursuant to Section 5/1 l-74.4-3(p) of the Act:

1. The Area is not less, in the aggregate, than one and one-half acres in size; and
2. Conditions exist in the Area that cause the Area to qualify for designation as a redevelopment project area and a blighted area as defined in the Act;

4

215

J. TJF Area Designation: CDC Form2b-reeoinml 119W

h.      If the Area is qualified as a "blighted area", whether improved or vacant, each of the

factors necessary to qualify the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area on that basis is (i)

present, with that presence documented to a meaningful extent so that it may be reasonably

found that the factor is clearly present within the intent of the Act and (ii) reasonably

distributed throughout the improved part or vacant part, as applicable, of the Area as required

pursuant to Section 5/1 l-74.4-3(a) of the Act;

i.      If the Area is qualified as a "conservation area" the combination of the factors necessary to

qualify the Area as a redevelopment project area on that basis is detrimental to the public

health, safety, morals or welfare, and the Area may become a blighted area; [and]

Section 3. The Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Plan pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act.

Section 4. The Commission recommends that the City Council designate the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act.

Section 5. The Commission recommends that the City Council adopt Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area.

Section 6. If any provision of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution.

Section 7. All resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

Section 8. This resolution shall be effective as of the date of its adoption.

List of Attachments:

Exhibit A: Street Boundary Description of the Area

5

216

Section 9. A certified copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council.

 

J. T1H Area Designation: CDC Form2b-rccomml 11904

EXHIBIT A

Street Boundary Description of the Area

The irregularly shaped area is generally bounded by 111th Street on the north, the Calumet River on the south, Yale Avenue and State Street on the east and Carpenter Street on the west.

6

217

EXHIBIT C

Legal Description of the 2014 Amended Project Area See Attached.

218

Corrected Exhibit C - April 29, 2014

119th / HALSTED TIF DISTRICT

1. ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 20, 21, 28, 32, 33 (NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE) AND 29 IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
2. BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. WITH THE CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST.;
3. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST. TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE 8 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF STANLEY MATHEWS SUBDIVISION IN THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, SAID LINE BEING ALSO THE CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING SAID LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION;
4. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE LINE 8 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN MAPLE PARK COURT RESUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY;
5. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CENTER LINE OF 117th ST.;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 117th ST. TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY LYING EAST AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 12 THROUGH 35, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 1 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
7. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th ST.;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

- 1 -

1. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th ST. TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN SAID BLOCK 2 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF ORIGINAL BLOCKS 8 AND 11 AND ALL OF THAT PART OF BLOCK 7, LYING WEST OF THE P. C. C. & St. L. R. R. IN ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 15 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.;
4. THENCE WEST ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF PEORIA ST. WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 29 AND 18 IN BLOCK 4 IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF BLOCKS 8 & 11 AND ALL OF BLOCKS 9 & 10, EXCEPT LOTS 19, 22, AND 23 OF BLOCK 10 OF THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
5. THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 29 AND 18 IN BLOCK 4 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF SANGAMON ST.;
6. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF SANGAMON ST. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 19, 20

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

- 2 -

AND 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF BLOCKS 8 & 11 AND ALL OF BLOCKS 9 & 10, EXCEPT LOTS 19, 22, AND 23 OF BLOCK 10 OF THE ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 19, 20 AND 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION;
2. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 18 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 18 AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK 3 IN SAID RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF MORGAN ST.;
4. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF MORGAN ST. TO THE NORTH LINE OF 119th ST.;
5. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF 119th ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.;
6. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE PEORIA ST. TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION;
7. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;
8. THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 1 OF FIRST ADDITION OF WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH LINE OF 120th ST.;
9. THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 8 OF SAID FIRST ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN SUBDIVISION;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

- j -

1. THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 8 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 18;
2. THENCE SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET ALONG THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE;
3. THENCE 142 FEET, MORE OR LESS, WESTERLY TO THE EAST LINE OF VACATED GREEN ST.;

THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF VACATED GREEN ST. TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD;

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD TO THE EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST.;
2. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF PEORIA ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD;
3. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST.; ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY LYING WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 123rd ST.;
4. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 123rd ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST.;
5. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.);
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 127^th ST. (BURR OAK ST.) TO THE WEST LINE OF PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART LYING NORTH OF THE LITTLE CALUMET RIVER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (EXCEPT THE WEST 25 ACRES THEREOF) OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;

-4-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29. 2001/Rev. April 29. 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION;
2. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID PON & COMPANY'S RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NEW ROSELAND SUBDIVISION NO. 2, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
3. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN SAID NEW ROSELAND SUBDIVISION NO. 2, TO THE WEST LINE OF HALSTED ST.;
4. THENCE EAST TO THE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF HALSTED ST. WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND, BEGIN A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 33, NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE AND PART OF FRACTIONAL SECTIONS 28 AND 33, SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
5. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOTS IN NEW ROSELAND TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 16 FEET OF LOT 38 IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND AFORESAID;
6. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST 16 FEET OF LOT 38 IN BLOCK 16 IN NEW ROSELAND, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 129™ PL;
7. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF 129™ PL. AFORESAID WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARNELL AVE.;
8. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF 129™ PL. TO THE EAST LINE OF UNION AVE.;
9. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF UNION AVE. TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST.;
10. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST. TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29. 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, TO THE CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.);
2. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 127™ ST. (BURR OAK ST.) TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD;
3. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD TO THE SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST.;
4. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF 125™ ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF YALE AVE.;
5. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF YALE AVE. TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN WEST PULLMAN, SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO SOUTH OF AND ADJOINING THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF WEST PULLMAN LYING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
6. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST., BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2^nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST 13.565 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
7. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. AND THE WEST LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2^nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 105;
8. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 105 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S 2^nd ADDITION TO KENSINGTON TO THE WEST LINE OF STATE ST.;

-6-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago. Illinois 60630

1. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF STATE ST. WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 6 FEET OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 9 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH 20 ACRES OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 EXCEPT THE NORTH 4 ACRES, ALSO THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22 EXCEPT THE RAILROAD, ALSO THE WEST FRACTIONAL HALF OF SECTION 27 EXCEPT THE RAILROAD, ALL NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, ALSO THE NORTH 21 ACRES OF THE NORTHEAST FRACTIONAL QUARTER OF SECTION 28 LYING SOUTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 6 FEET OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 26 AFORESAID;
3. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION AFORESAID;
4. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. IN BLOCK 1 IN YOUNG & CLARKSON'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVE.;
5. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH MICHIGAN AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST. IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST., AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID;
7. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH STATE ST. TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON AFORESAID;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

-7-

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 2 IN SAWYER'S SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 4 IN FIRST ADDITION TO KENSINGTON, TO THE EAST LINE OF STATE ST.;
2. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 19 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART LYING EAST OF THE WEST 49 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 19 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 19;
4. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 30 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID;
5. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 30 IN BLOCK 7 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, TO THE EAST LINE OF LAFAYETTE AVE.;
6. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK 6 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID;
7. THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 21 IN BLOCK 6 IN FALLIS & GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN AFORESAID, AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, TO THE EAST LINE OF JAMES R. MANN'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 7, 8 & 9 IN ALLEN'S SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST 49 ACRES OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
8. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF JAMES R. MANN'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST.;
9. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119™ ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HARVARD AVE.;

-8-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001 /Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HARVARD AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 6 IN A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, A SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO CENTER LINE OF STEWART AVE.;
3. THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF STEWART AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 6 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, IN HUGH LAUDER'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT 8 IN BLOCK 5 IN SAID A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN;
4. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF EGGLESTON AVE.;
5. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF EGGLESTON AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 10 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 4 IN SAID A. O. TYLOR'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF NORMAL AVE.;
7. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF NORMAL AVE. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO NORTH OF AND ADJOINING THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 17 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 4 IN HANNAH B. GANO'S ADDITION TO PULLMAN, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST

-9-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29. 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH 119th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 28 IN BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE EAST LINE OF LOT 28 IN BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN AND THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th PL;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th PL. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO WEST OF AND ADJOINING THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 11, INCLUSIVE, IN SAID BLOCK 4 IN KNEELAND AND WRIGHT'S 2nd ADDITION TO WEST PULLMAN;
4. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 118th ST.;
5. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 118th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 170 THROUGH 165, INCLUSIVE, IN SHARPSHOOTER'S PARK SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SHARPSHOOTER'S PARK, SAID PARK BEING THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
6. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST.;
7. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST.;
8. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF HALSTED ST. TO THE CENTER LINE OF 114th ST.;

- 10-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29. 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

1. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 114th ST. TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH GREEN ST., SAID ALLEY BEING ALSO EAST OF AND ADJOINING THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 16 THROUGH 30, INCLUSIVE, IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION, A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH GREEN ST. TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE SAID LOT 30 IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION;
3. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND THE SOUTH LINE SAID LOT 30 IN SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 31 IN SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION;
4. THENCE CONTINUING WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 31 IN SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION;
5. THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST FIFTH ADDITION, SAID WEST LINE BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF AN 8 FOOT ALLEY WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH PEORIA ST., TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF A LINE 16 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 19 AND 20 IN THE SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST TWO THIRDS OF THE WEST THREE EIGHTS OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
6. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG A LINE 16 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 19 AND 20 IN THE SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION, SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE BEING ALSO A LINE 8 FEET SOUTHWEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 20 THROUGH 23, INCLUSIVE IN SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST;

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]      Chicago Guarantee Survey Company

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.      4505 N. Elston Ave.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014      Chicago, Illinois 60630

- 11 -

1. THENCE NORTHWEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SIXTH ADDITION TO SHELDON HEIGHTS WEST SUBDIVISION, SAID POINT BEING 1,032.98 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
2. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, SAID POINT BEING 1,188.76 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20;
3. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20 TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD;
4. THENCE NORTHWEST ALONG SAID THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF 111th ST.;
5. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 111th ST. TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD;
6. THENCE SOUTHEAST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE PENN CENTRAL RAIL ROAD TO THE CENTER LINE OF 115th ST.;
7. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF 115th ST. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE CENTER LINE OF MORGAN ST.
8. ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

- 12-

Order No. 2013-18620 [9804020]

Ordered By: Camiros Ltd.

June 29, 2001/Rev. April 29, 2014

Chicago Guarantee Survey Company 4505 N. Elston Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60630

EXHIBIT D

Street Location of the 2014 Amended Project Area

The irregularly shaped area is generally bounded by 111^th Street on the north, the Calumet River on the south, State Street on the east and Carpenter Street on the west.

228

EXHIBIT E Map of the 2014 Amended Project Area See Attached.

229

![H1[E

II      | |      ! r'jr      1—!       

idUUb

 

Legend

I      (Original Project Area

K.S} Amendment Area

FIGURE

camiros

Redevelopment Project Arp_a Rn._mff_{nrv Mai}

City of Chicago      *"      ¹      

119th * Halsted TIF Amendment No. 2

230

119"" and Halsted TIF Second Amended Plan December 31, 2013