Record #: F2011-51   
Type: Report Status: Placed on File
Intro date: 5/4/2011 Current Controlling Legislative Body:
Final action: 5/4/2011
Title: Inspector General's Quarterly Report (2011 Q1)
Sponsors: Dept./Agency
Topic: REPORTS - Quarterly
Attachments: 1. F2011-51.pdf
Office of the Inspector General
City of Chicago

—-n
r-o
:r: |....
ro
Report of the Inspector General's Office: *************************
Quarterly Report of the Inspector General's%ff$ce
First Quarter 2011
r-o
cn co
April 2011
866-IG-TIPLINE (866-448-4754) wwwxhicagoinspectorgeneral .org

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
City of Chicago
180 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2000 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Telephone: (773) 478-7799 Fax: (773) 478-3949
Joseph M. Ferguson Inspector General
April 14,2011
To the Mayor, Members of the City Council, the City Clerk, the City Treasurer, and the residents of the City of Chicago:
Enclosed for your review is the public report on the operations of the Office of Inspector General (IGO) during the first quarter of 2011, filed with the City Council pursuant to Section 2-156-120 of the Municipal Code of Chicago. In order to keep you apprised of IGO activities and operations, the enclosed report again includes summaries of sustained IGO investigations, policy recommendations, and hiring compliance efforts.
As always, the sustained case summaries do not reveal the identities of the subjects of investigations in keeping with the IGO's ordinance-prescribed confidentiality obligation. However, each summary provides detail on the general nature and subject matter of the IGO investigations, the results of those investigations to include IGO disciplinary and program recommendations, and the final departmental actions on those recommendations. Please note that this report does not summarize cases reported out this quarter by the IGO for which a - ^disciplinary response from the subject department is still pending.
Beyond the standard misconduct and discipline recommendations, this report also specifies policy and program recommendations advanced during the quarter. Some of these recommendations have been addressed by the City, while some await feedback. We continue to ask that City officials and the broader community contact the IGO with suggestions ...

Click here for full text