Record #: F2011-133   
Type: Report Status: Placed on File
Intro date: 7/6/2011 Current Controlling Legislative Body:
Final action: 7/6/2011
Title: Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Ewing Avenue Annual Report (2010)
Sponsors: Dept./Agency
Topic: TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS - Ewing Ave T.I.F.
Attachments: 1. F2011-133.pdf
 
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
 
0
 
 
CITY OF CHICAGO
JUN 30 2011
RAHM EMANUEL
MAYOR
June 22, 2011
BY:
COMPTROLLER L.G.A.D.
Hand-delivered June M. Canello
TIF Administrator, Local Government Office of the Illinois Comptroller 100 West Randolph - Suite 15-500 Chicago, Illinois 60601
Re: Notice of the Designation of a City of Chicago TIF Administrator for Purposes of Fil ing the 2010 Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery Annual Reports for the City of Chicago (the "City")
Dear Ms. Canello:
This letter is intended to meet the requirements of your office as set forth in the "TIF Administrator Contact Information" section of your office's 'Tax Increment Finance Report Instructions" for fiscal year 2010.
Please be advised that the City's Department of Housing and Economic Development (the "Department"), which is the successor department to the prior Department of Community Development, has the primary responsibility for preparing and filing the Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery annual reports with the Illinois Comptroller as required by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4 et seq. and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6 et seq. The administrative head of the Department, and thus the TIF Administrator for the City, is the Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Economic Development (the "Commissioner").
Andrew J. Mooney has been the Commissioner of the Department since February 9,2011 and remains in that position to the present day. He is the TIF Administrator for the City for . purposes of filing the City's 2010 Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery Annual Reports.
Sincerely,
 
 
2010 Annual Report
Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
Pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/ll-74.4-5(d)
June 30,2011
 
COM t?,TRO LLJER
ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA
Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010
County.-Cook Fiscal Year End: 12/31/2010
Unit Code: 016/620/30
First Name: Andrew J. Last Name: Mooney
Address:   City Hall 121 N. LaSalle Title: TIF Administrator
Telephone: (312)744-0025 City: Chicago, IL Zip: 60602
I attest to the best of my knowledge, this report of the redevelopment project areas.In:
City/Village of Chicago _is complete and accurate at the end of this reporting
Fiscal year under the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 et. seq.] ■  Or the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law [65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-10 et. seq.]
 
Written signature of TIF Aamlnlsfrator _Pate-
Section 1 (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (1.5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (1.5)*)
FILL OUT ONE F.ORE'ACH TIFifDiSiTiRIC T
Name of Redevelopment Project Area
Date Designated
Date Terminated
105th/Vincennes
10/3/2001
12/31/2025
111th Street/Kedzie Avenue Business District
9/29/1999
9/29/2022
119th and Halsted
2/6/2002
12/31/2026
119th/l-57
11/6/2002
12/31/2026
126th and Torrence
12/21/1994
12/21/2017
134th and Avenue K
3/12/2008
3/12/2032
24th/Mlchigan
7/21/1999
7/21/2022
26th and King Drive
1/11/2006
12/31/2030
35th and Wallace
12/15/1999
12/31/2023
35th/Halsted
1/14/1997
12/31/2021
35th/State
1/14/2004
12/31/2028
40th/State
3/10/2004
12/31/2028
43rd/Cottage Grove
7/8/1998
7/8/2021
45th/Western Industrial Park Conservation Area
3/27/2002
12/31/2026
47th/Ash!and
3/27/2002
12/31/2026
47th/Halsted
5/29/2002
12/31/2026
47th/King Drive
3/27/2002
12/31/2026
47th/State
7/21/2004
12/31/2028
49th Street/St. Lawrence Avenue
1/10/1996
12/31/2020
51st/ Archer
5/17/2000
12/31/2024
53rd Street
1/10/2001
12/31/2025
60th and Western
5/9/1996
5/9/2019
"All statutory citations refer to one of two sections of the Illinois Municipal Code: the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 et. seq.] or the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law [65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-10 et. seq.)
.I;mies K. Thomson CVnicr ljornl C.iucnum'ul DKisinu 1(111 W. Itiiiiiliilpli Slni-I. Slihc l.l-jtlO Uiiono. It.liOfiill
Tel.: (S77) 3(H tWO'l l'u.v.       SI W.'IM. K-nsiil: l.xwovJiiiBin.ioi-.u.ili.-al.m
 
ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA
Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010
County:Cook Fiscal Year End:  12/31 /2010
Unit Code: 016/620/30
63rd/Ashland
3/29/2006
12/31/2030
63rd/Pulaskl
5/17/2000
12/31/2024
67th/Cicero
10/2/2002
12/31/2026
69th/Ashland
11/3/2004
12/31/2028
71st and Stony Island
10/7/1998
10/7/2021
72nd and Cicero
11/17/1993
11/17/2016
73rd and Kedzle
11/17/1993
11/17/2016
73rd/Unlversity
9/13/2006
12/31/2030
79th and Cicero '
6/8/2005
7/8/2021
79th Street Corridor
7/8/1998
12/31/2025
79th Street/Southwest Highway
10/3/2001
12/31/2029
79thA/lncennes
9/27/2007
12/31/2031
83rd/Stewart
3/31/2004
12/31/2028
87th/Cottage Grove
11/13/2002
12/31/2026
89th and State
4/1/1998
4/1/2021
95th and Western
7/13/1995
7/13/2018
95th Street and Stony Island
5/16/1990
5/16/2013
Addison Corridor North
6/4/1997
6/4/2020
Addison South
5/9/2007
12/31/2031
Archer Courts
5/12/1999
12/31/2023
Archer/ Central
5/17/2000
12/31/2024
Archer/Western
2/11/2009
12/31/2033
Armltage/Pulaskl
6/13/2007
12/31/2031
Austin/Commercial
9/27/2007
12/31/2031
Avalon Park/South Shore.
7/31/2002
12/31/2026
Avondale
7/29/2009
12/31/2033
Belmont/ Central
1/12/2000 .
12/31/2024
Belmont/Cicero
1/12/2000
12/31/2024
Bronzeville
11/4/1998
12/31/2022
Bryn Mawr/Broadway
12/11/1996
12/11/2019
Calumet Avenue/Cermak Road ,
7/29/1998
7/29/2021
Calumet River
3/10/210
12/31/2034
Canal/Congress
11/12/1998
12/31/2022
Central West
2/16/2000
12/31/2024
Chatham-Ridge
12/18/1986
12/31/2010(1)
Chicago/ Kingsbury
4/12/2000
12/31/2024
Chicago/Central Park
2/27/2002
12/31/2026
Chicago Lakeside Development - Phase 1 (USX)
5/12/2010
12/31/2034
Chinatown Basin
12/18/1986
12/31/2010
Cicero/Archer
5/17/2000
12/31/2024
Clark Street and Ridge Avenue
9/29/1999
9/29/2022
Clark/Montrose
7/7/1999
7/7/2022
Commercial Avenue
11/13/2002
12/31/2026
Devon/Sheridan
3/31/2004
12/31/2028
COMPTROLLER
(1) This TIF has been terminated; however, the sales tax portion continues to exist for the sole purpose of servicing outstanding obligations which may be retired early at which point the sales tax portion will also terminate.
 
ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA
Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010
County:Cook Fiscal Year End: 12/31 /2010
Unit Code: 016/620/30
Devon/Western
11/3/1999
12/31/2023
Diversey/ Narragansett
2/5/2003
12/31/2027
Dlvislon/Homan
6/27/2001
12/31/2025
Division/North Branch
3/15/1991
3/15/2014
DIvlslon-Hooker
7/10/1996
7/10/2019
Drexel Boulevard
7/10/2002
12/31/2026
Eastman/North Branch
10/7/1993
10/7/2016
Edgewater
12/18/1986
12/18/2009
Edgewater/ Ashland
10/1/2003
12/31/2027
Elston/Armstrong Industrial Corridor
7/19/2007
12/31/2031
Englewood Mall
11/29/1989
11/29/2012
Englewood Neighborhood
6/27/2001
12/31/2025
Ewlng Avenue
3/10/2010
12/31/2034
Forty-first Street and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive
7/13/1994
7/13/2017
Fuilerton/ Milwaukee
2/16/2000
12/31/2024
Galewood/Armitage Industrial
7/7/1999
7/7/2022
Goose Island
7/10/1996
7/10/2019
Greater Southwest Industrial Corridor (East)
3/10/1999
12/31/2023
Greater Southwest Industrial Corridor (West)
4/12/2000
12/31/2024
Harlem Industrial Park Conservation Area
3/14/2007
12/31/2031
Harrison/Central
7/26/2006
12/31/2030
Hollywood/Sheridan
11/7/2007
12/31/2031
Homan/Grand Trunk
12/15/1993
12/15/2016
Homan-Arthlngton
2/5/1998
2/5/2021
Howard-Paulina
10/14/1988
10/14/2011
Humboldt Park Commercial
6/27/2001
12/31/2025
Irving Park/Elston
5/13/2009
12/31/2033
Irving/Cicero
6/10/1996
12/31/2020
Jefferson Park Business District
9/9/1998
9/9/2021
Jefferson/ Roosevelt
8/30/2000
12/31/2024
Kennerjy/Klmball
3/12/2008
3/12/2032
Klnzle Industrial Corridor
6/10/1998
6/10/2021
Kostner Avenue
11/5/2008
11/5/2032
Lake Calumet Area Industrial
12/13/2000
12/31/2024
Lakefront
3/27/2002
12/31/2026
Lakeside/Clarendon
7/21/2004
12/31/2028
LaSalle Central
11/15/2006
12/31/2030
Lawrence/ Kedzie
2/16/2000
12/31/2024
Lawrence/Broadway
6/27/2001
12/31/2025
Lawrence/Pulaski
2/27/2002
12/31/2026
Lincoln Avenue
11/3/1999
12/31/2023
Lincoln-Belmont-Ashland
11/2/1994
11/2/2017
Little Village East
4/22/2009
12/31/2033
Little Village Industrial Corridor
6/13/2007
12/31/2031
 
ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA
Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010
County:Cook Fiscal Year End:  12/31 /2010
Unit Code: 016/620/30
Madden/Wells
11/6/2002
12/31/2026
Madison/Austin Corridor
9/29/1999
12/31/2023
Michlgan/Cermak
9/13/1989
9/13/2012
Midway Industrial Corridor
2/16/2000
12/31/2024
Midwest
5/17/2000
12/31/2024
Montclare
8/30/2000
12/31/2024
Montrose/Clarendon
6/30/2010
12/31/2034
Near North
7/30/1997
7/30/2020
Near South
11/28/1990
12/31/2014
Near West
3/23/1989
12/31/2013
North Branch (North)
7/2/1997
,12/31/2021
North Branch (South)
2/5/1998
2/5/2021
North Pullman
6/30/2009
12/31/2033
North-Cicero
7/30/1997
7/30/2020
Northwest Industrial Corridor
12/2/1998
12/2/2021
Ogden/Pulaskl
4/9/2008
4/9/2032
Ohio/Wabash
6/7/2000
12/31/2024
Pershing/King
9/5/2007
12/31/2031
Peterson/ Cicero
2/16/2000
12/31/2024
Peterson/ Pulaski
2/16/2000
12/31/2024
Pilsen Industrial Corridor
6/10/1998
12/31/2022
Portage Park
9/9/1998
9/9/2021
Pratt/Ridge Industrial Park Conservation Area
6/23/2004
12/31/2028
Pulaski Corridor
6/9/1999
6/9/2022
Randolph and Wells
6/9/2010
12/31/2034
Ravenswood Corridor
3/9/2005
12/31/2029
Read-Dunning
1/11/1991
12/31/2015
River South
7/30/1997
7/30/2020
River West
1/10/2001
12/31/2025
Roosevelt/Canal
3/19/1997
12/31/2021
Roosevelt/Cicero
2/5/1998
2/5/2021
Roosevelt/Racine
11/4/1998
12/31/2022
Roosevelt/Union
5/12/1999
5/12/2022
Roosevelt-Homan
12/5/1990
12/5/2013
Roseland/Mlchigan
1/16/2002
12/31/2026
Sanitary Drainage and Ship Canal
7/24/1991
7/24/2014
South Chicago
4/12/2000
12/31/2024
South Works Industrial
11/3/1999
12/31/2023
Stevenson/Brighton
4/11/2007
12/31/2031
Stockyards Annex
12/11/1996
12/31/2020
Stockyards Industrial Commercial
3/9/1989
3/9/2012
Stockyards Southeast Quadrant Industrial
2/26/1992
2/26/2015
Stony Island Avenue Commercial and Burnslde Industrial Corridors
6/10/1998
6/10/2021
Touhy/Westem
9/13/2006
12/31/2030
C OM P.TROL LE R
 
ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA
Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010
County:Cook Fiscal Year End: 12/31 /2010
Unit Code: 016/620/30
Weed/Fremont
1/8/2008
1/8/2032
West Grand
6/10/1996
6/10/2019
West Irving Park
1/12/2000
12/31/2024
West Pullman Industrial Park
3/11/1998
3/11/2021
West Ridge-Peterson Avenue
10/27/1986
12/31/2010
West Wood lawn
5/12/2010
12/31/2034
Western Avenue North
1/12/2000
12/31/2024
Western Avenue Rock Island
2/8/2006
12/31/2024
Western Avenue South
1/12/2000
12/31/2030
Western/Ogden
2/5/1998
2/5/2021
Wilson Yard
6/27/2001
12/31/2025
Woodlawn
1/20/1999
1/20/2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COMPTROl-LBn
'WifiwtoQjUM.I-U*.'
 
SECTION 2 [Sections 2 through 5 must be completed for each redevelopment project area listed in Section 1.]
Name of Redevelopment Project Area: Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project Area_
Primary Use of Redevelopment Project Area*: Combination/Mixed_
If "Combination/Mixed" List Component Types: Commercial/Residential_
Under which section of the Illinois Municipal Code was Redevelopment Project Area designated? (check one): Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act   X _Industrial Jobs Recovery Law _
 
No
Yes
Were there any amendments to the redevelopment plan, the redevelopment project area, or the State Sales Tax Boundary? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (1) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (1)] If yes, please enclose the amendment labeled Attachment A
X
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the municipality that the municipality has complied with all of the requirements of the Act during the preceding fiscal year. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (3) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (3)]
Please enclose the CEO Certification labeled Attachment B
 
X
Opinion of legal counsel that municipality is in compliance with the Act. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (4) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d)(4)]
Please enclose the Legal Counsel Opinion labeled Attachment C
 
X
Were there any activities undertaken in furtherance of the objectives of the redevelopment plan, including any project implemented in the preceding fiscal year and a description of the activities undertaken? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (A and B) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (A and B)] If yes, please enclose the Activities Statement labeled Attachment D
 
X
Were any agreements entered into by the municipality with regard to the disposition or redevelopment of any property within the redevelopment project area or the area within the State Sales Tax Boundary? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (C) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (C)] If yes, please enclose the Aqreement(s) labeled Attachment E
 
X
Is there additional information on the use of all funds received under this Division and steps taken by the municipality to achieve the objectives of the redevelopment plan? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (D) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (D)]
If ves, please enclose the Additional Information labeled Attachment F
 
X
Did the municipality's TIF advisors or consultants enter into contracts with entities or persons that have received or are receiving payments financed by tax increment revenues produced by the same TIF? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (E) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (E)]
If yes, please enclose the contract(s) or description of the contract(s) labeled Attachment G
X
 
Were there any reports or meeting minutes submitted to the municipality by the joint review board? [65
ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (F) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (F)]
If yes, please enclose the Joint Review Board Report labeled Attachment H
 
X
Were any obligations issued by municipality? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (8) (A) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (8) (A)]
If ves, please enclose the Official Statement labeled Attachment I
X
 
Was analysis prepared by a financial advisor or underwriter setting forth the nature and term of obligation and projected debt service including required reserves and debt coverage? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (8) (B) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (8) (B)]
If ves, please enclose the Analysis labeled Attachment J
X
 
Cumulatively, have deposits equal or greater than $100,000 been made into the special tax allocation fund? 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (2) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (2)
If yes, please enclose Audited financial statements of the special tax allocation fund labeled Attachment K
 
X
Cumulatively, have deposits of incremental revenue equal to or greater than $100,000 been made into the special tax allocation fund? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (9) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (9)] If yes, please enclose a certified letter statement reviewing compliance with the Act labeled Attachment L
 
X
A list of all intergovernmental agreements in effect in FY 2010, to which the municipality is a part, and an accounting of any money transferred or received by the municipality during that fiscal year pursuant to those intergovernmental agreements. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (10)]
If yes, please enclose list only of the intergovernmental agreements labeled Attachment M
 
X
 
* Types include: Central Business District, Retail, Other Commercial, Industrial, Residential, and Combination/Mixed.
FY 2010 Section 2
 
SECTION 3.1 -(65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5)) Provide an analysis of the special tax allocation fund.
| Reporting Year |   Cumulative * |
Fund Balance at Beginning of Reporting Period | $ -1
Revenue/Cash Receipts Deposited in Fund During Reporting FY:
 
% of Total
Property Tax Increment
 
 
0%
State Sales Tax Increment
 
 
0%
Local Sales Tax Increment
 
 
0%
State Utility Tax Increment
 
 
0%
Local Utility Tax Increment
 
 
0%
Interest
 
 
0%
Land/Building Sale Proceeds
 
 
0%
Bond Proceeds
 
 
0%
Transfers in from Municipal Sources (Porting in)
1773,456
1,773,456
100%
Private Sources
 
 
0%
Other (identify source                   ; if multiple other sources, attach schedule)
 
 
0%
Total Amount Deposited In Special Tax Allocation Fund During Reporting Period
Cumulative Total Revenues/Cash Receipts
Total Expenditures/Cash Disbursements (Carried forward from Section 3.2)
Transfers out to Municipal Sources (Porting out)
Distribution of Surplus
Total Expenditures/Disbursements
NET INCOME/CASH RECEIPTS OVER/(UNDER) CASH DISBURSEMENTS FUND BALANCE, END OF REPORTING PERIOD
1,773,456
1,126,410
1,126,410
647,046
647,046
1,773,456
100%
- if there is a positive fund balance at the end of the reporting period, you must complete Section 3.3
* Except as set forth in the next sentence, each amount reported on the rows below, if any, is cumulative from the inception of the respective Project Area. Cumulative figures for the categories of 'Interest,' 'Land/Building Sale Proceeds' and 'Other' may not be fully available for this report due to either of the following: (i) the disposal of certain older records pursuant to the City's records retention policy, or (ii) the availability of records only from January 1,1997 forward.
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
SECTION 3.2 A- (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5))
ITEMIZED LIST OF ALL EXPENDITURES FROM THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUND
(by category of permissible redevelopment cost, amounts expended during reporting period)
FOR AMOUNTS >$10,000 SECTION 3.2 B MUST BE COMPLETED
Category of Permissible Redevelopment Cost [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 (q) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-10 (o)]
Reporting Fiscal Year
1. Costs of studies, administration and professional services—Subsections (q)(1) and (o) (1)
 
i
 
 
 
 
 
t
 
 
,   •        V   ''' >
 
 
< ' * „' £ V
 
 
 
 
 
• **•      r?. <i< ,*;
 
 
 
 
 
$
2. Cost of marketing sites—Subsections (q)(1.6) and (o)(1.6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* te v.-2
 
 
' i     r '
 
 
>- " „i *J
 
 
,   ~/Sr   ► ^
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3. Property assembly, demolition, site preparation and environmental site improvement costs. Subsection (q)(2), (o)(2) and (o)(3)
 
 
 
 
• i   1) '
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, repair or remodeling and replacement of existing public buildings. Subsection (q)(3) and (o)(4)
i    -   1            i -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
t
 
 
 
 
 
/      - 11 <
 
 
t   »'r *~V" > >.->-.
 
 
$
5. Costs of construction of public works and improvements. Subsection (q)(4) and (o)(5)
 
 
 
1.126.410
f                      <_ '
 
 
h I       L  *    !i «
 
 
{
 
 
 
 
 
l
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$ 1.126.410
6. Costs of removing contaminants required by environmental laws or rules (o)(6) - Industrial Jobs Recovery TIFs ONLY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
7. Cost of job training and retraining, including "welfare to work" programs Subsection (q)(5), (o)(7) and (o)(12)
 
■>     " i
- . _ . 1
 
 
Si.
,vu     *       ■ ,%
 
 
C                   i \
 
 
*( ft  i> j- -x'v ,*-=!
 
 
 
 
 
*■ 3   #*f3 < it   "»-?\ k
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
8. Financing costs. Subsection (q) (6) and (o)(8)
<          & '   ' ^ «t
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
'   *       h't   '    '      . '•<
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f   t ^            ■* ^ k ^
 
 
$ .
9. Approved capital costs. Subsection (q)(7) and (o)(9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
>   • „-!><<,,
 
 
«v      ,    -I- ft
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$ '
10, Cost of Reimbursing school districts for their increased costs caused by TIF assisted housing projects. Subsection (q)(7.5) - Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY
*   *     . tl
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
> 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
11, Relocation costs. Subsection (q)(8) and (o)(10)
h.                      ( '«■
!
 
 
 
 
 
!                      ~ r i
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
12. Payments in lieu of taxes. Subsection (q)(9) and (o)(11)
 
V.....                  a !-:<?!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
13. Costs of job training, retraining advanced vocational or career education provided by other taxing bodies. Subsection (q)(10) and (o)(12)
i 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
!
 
 
 
 
 
$
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
14. Costs of reimbursing private developers for interest expenses incurred on approved redevelopment projects. Subsection (q)(11)(A-E) and (o)(13)(A-E)
 
,v
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$ -
15. Costs of construction of new housing units for low income and very low-income households Subsection (q)(11)(F) - Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
'   f T"
 
 
v        J      '   '''■« *
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
16. Cost of day care services and operational costs of day care centers. Subsection (q) (11.5) -Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY
 
* *s -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
TOTAL ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES | |$ 1,126,410 |
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
Section 3.2 B
List all vendors, including other municipal funds, that were paid in excess of $10,000 during the current reporting year.*
Name
Service
Amount
MY BAPS Construction Corp.
Public Improvement
$1,126,410
* This table may include payments for Projects that were undertaken prior to 11/1/1999.
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
SECTION 3.3 - (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) 65 ILCS 11-74.6-22 (d) (5))
Breakdown of the Balance in the Special Tax Allocation Fund At the End of the Reporting Period (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) (D) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5) (D))
FUND BALANCE, END OF REPORTING PERIOD
1. Description of Debt Obligations
$
647,046
Amount of Original Issuance
Amount Designated
Reserved for debt service
$
$
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Amount Designated for Obligations
Designated for future redevelopment project costs
 
$ 647,046
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Amount Designated for Project Costs
647,046
TOTAL AMOUNT DESIGNATED SURPLUS*/(DEFICIT)
647,046
*NOTE: If a surplus is calculated, the municipality may be required to repay the amount to overlapping taxing districts.
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
SECTION 4 [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (6) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (6)]
Provide a description of all property purchased by the municipality during the reporting fiscal year within the redevelopment project area.
Property Acquired by the Municipality Within the Redevelopment Project Area
Property (1):
 
Street address:
3915 E. 106th Street
Approximate size or description of property:
N/A
Purchase price:
 
Seller of property:
N/A
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
SECTION 5 - 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (G) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (G)
Please include a brief description of each project.
X_No Projects Were Undertaken by the Municipality Within the Redevelopment Project Area
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK
)
) ss
)
Attachment B
CERTI
TO:
Judy Baar Topinka
Comptroller of the State of Illinois
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street, Suite 15-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Attention: June Canello, Director of Local
Government
Dolores Javier, Treasurer
City Colleges of Chicago
226 West Jackson Boulevard, Room 1125
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Herman Brewer Director
Cook County Bureau of Planning & Dev. 69 West Washington Street, Suite 2900 Chicago, Illinois 60602
ICATION
Jean-Claude Brizard Chief Executive Officer Chicago Board of Education 125 South Clark Street, 5th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60603
Jacqueline Torres, Director of Finance Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago 100 East Erie Street, Room 2429 Chicago, Illinois 60611
Douglas Wright
South Cook County Mosquito Abatement District
155th & Dixie Highway P.O.Box 1030 Harvey, Illinois 60426
Dan Donovan, Comptroller Forest Preserve District of Cook County 69 W. Washington Street, Suite 2060 Chicago, IL 60602
Michael P. Kelly, Interim General Superintendent & CEO Chicago Park District 541 North Fairbanks Chicago, Illinois 60611
I, Rahm Emanuel, in connection with the annual report (the "Report") of information required by Section 11 -74.4-5(d) of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS5/11-74.4-1 et seg, (the "Act") with regard to the Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Project Area"), do hereby certify as follows:
 
Attachment B
1. I am the duly qualified and acting Mayor of the City of Chicago, Illinois (the "City") and, as such, I am the City's Chief Executive Officer. This Certification is being given by me in such capacity.
2. During the preceding fiscal year of the City, being January 1 through December 31, 2010, the City complied, in all material respects, with the requirements of the Act, as applicable from time to time, regarding the Redevelopment Project Area.
3. In giving this Certification, I have relied on the opinion of the Corporation Counsel of the City furnished in connection with the Report.
4. This Certification may be relied upon only by the addressees hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my official signature as of this 30th day of June, 2011.
 
Rahm Emanuel, Mayor City of Chicago, Illinois
 
Department of Law
j CITY OF CHICAGO
June 30,2011
Attachment C
Judy Baar Topinka
Comptroller of the State of Illinois
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph Street, Suite 15-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Attention: June Canello, Director of Local
Government
Dolores Javier, Treasurer
City Colleges of Chicago
226 West Jackson Boulevard, Room 1125
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Jean-Claude Brizard Chief Executive Officer Chicago Board of Education 125 South Clark Street, 5th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60603
Jacqueline Torres, Director of Finance Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago 100 East Erie Street, Room 2429 Chicago, Illinois 60611
Herman Brewer Director
Cook County Bureau of Planning & Dev. 69 West Washington Street, Suite 2900 Chicago, Illinois 60602
Douglas Wright
South Cook County Mosquito Abatement District
155th & Dixie Highway P.O. Box 1030 Harvey, Illinois 60426
Dan Donovan, Comptroller Forest Preserve District of Cook County 69 W. Washington Street, Suite 2060 Chicago, IL 60602
Michael P. Kelly, Interim General Superintendent & CEO Chicago Park District 541 North Fairbanks Chicago, Illinois 60611
Re:     Ewing Avenue
Redevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Project Area")
Dear Addressees:
I am the Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Illinois (the "City") and, in such capacity, I am the head of the City's Law Department. In such capacity, I am providing the opinion required by Section 1 l-74.4-5(d)(4) of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et sea,, (the "Act"), in connection with the submission of the report (the "Report") in accordance with, and containing the information required by, Section 1 l-74.4-5(d) of the Act for the Redevelopment Project Area.
1 NORTH LASALLE STREET, ROOM 600, CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60602
 
Attachment C
Opinion of Counsel for 2010 Annual Report Page 2
June 30, 2011
Attorneys, past and present, in the Law Department of the City and familiar with the requirements of the Act, have had general involvement in the proceedings affecting the Redevelopment Project Area, including the preparation of ordinances adopted by the City Council of the City with respect to the following matters: approval of the redevelopment plan and project for the Redevelopment Project Area, designation of the Redevelopment Project Area as a redevelopment project area, and adoption of tax increment allocation financing for the Redevelopment Project Area, all in accordance with the then applicable provisions of the Act. Various departments of the City, including, if applicable, the Law Department, Department of Housing and Economic Development, Department of Finance and Office of Budget and Management (collectively, the "City Departments"), have personnel responsible for and familiar with the activities in the Redevelopment Project Area affecting such Department(s) and with the requirements of the Act in connection therewith. Such personnel are encouraged to seek and obtain, and do seek and obtain, the legal guidance of the Law Department with respect to issues that may arise from time to time regarding the requirements of, and compliance with, the Act.
In my capacity as Corporation Counsel, I have relied on the general knowledge and actions of the appropriately designated and trained staff of the Law Department and other applicable City Departments involved with the activities affecting the Redevelopment Project Area. In addition, I have caused to be examined or reviewed by members of the Law Department of the City the certified audit report, to the extent required to be obtained by Section 1 l-74.4-5(d)(9) of the Act and submitted as part of the Report, which is required to review compliance with the Act in certain respects, to determine if such audit report contains information that might affect my opinion. I have also caused to be examined or reviewed such other documents and records as were deemed necessary to enable me to render this opinion. Nothing has come to my attention that would result in my need to qualify the opinion hereinafter expressed, subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth, unless and except to the extent set forth in an Exception Schedule attached hereto as Schedule 1.
i
Based on the foregoing, I am of the opinion that, in all material respects, the City is in compliance with the provisions and requirements of the Act in effect and then applicable at the time actions were taken from time to time with respect to the Redevelopment Project Area.
This opinion is given in an official capacity and not personally and no personal liability shall derive herefrom. Furthermore, the only opinion that is expressed is the opinion specifically set forth herein, and no opinion is implied or should be inferred as to any other matter. Further, this opinion may be relied upon only by the addressees hereof and the Mayor of the City in providing his required certification in connection with the Report, and not by any other party.
 
Stephen R. Patton Corporation Counsel
 
ATTACHMENT C
SCUEDVLE1 (Exception Schedule)
(X) ( )
No Exceptions
Note the following Exceptions:
 
ATTACHMENTS D, E and F
ATTACHMENT D
Activities Statement
Projects that were implemented during the preceding fiscal year, if any, are set forth below: None
Redevelopment activities undertaken within this Project Area during the preceding fiscal year, if any, have been made pursuant to: (i) the Redevlopment Plan for the Project Area, and (ii) any Redevelopment Agreements affecting the Project Area, and are set forth in Section 3 herein by TIF-eligible expenditure category.
ATTACHMENT E
Agreements
Agreements entered into concerning the disposition or redevelopment of property within the Project Area during the preceding fiscal year, if any, are attached hereto.
None
ATTACHMENT F Additional Information
The amounts shown elsewhere in this report, including those shown in Section 3 herein, have been used to pay for project cost within the Project Area and for debt service (if applicable), all in furtherance of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area.
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewinq Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
ATTACHMENT H
CITY   OF CHICAGO JOINT   REVIEW BOARD
0
R
 
Report   of  proceedings   of   a hearing
before   the   City  of   Chicago,   Joint Review Board   held   on   November   6,    2009,   at   10:20 a City   Hall,   Room   1003,   Conference Room, Chicago,   Illinois,   and  presided  over by Ms.   Tanya Anthony.
PRESENT:
MS. TANYA   ANTHONY, CHAIRMAN
MS. GLORIA PERALTA
MS . SUSAN   MARE K
MR. FRANCIS THURMAN
MR. JOHN SCHNEIDER
MS . MARTHA PENA
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
REPORTED   BY:
By :
LeGrand  Reporting Services 333   West   Irving   Park   Rd. Roselle, Illinois Carol Robertson
 
2
1 MS.   ANTHONY:     Okay,   for   the record
2 my  name   is  Tanya  Anthony.     I   am the
3 representative  of   the  Chicago   Park District
4 which  under   Section   117445   of   the Tax
5 Increment  Allocation  Redevelopment  Act is
6 one  of   the   statutorily  designated  members of
7 the  Joint  Review  Board.     Until   election of a
8 chairperson   I   will  moderate   the   Joint Review
9 Board meeting.
10 For  the   record,   this  meeting  of the
11 Joint  Review  Board   is   to  review  the proposed
12 Calumet  River  Tax   Increment Financing
13 District.     The   date   of   this   meeting was
14 announced  at   and  set  by  the Community
15 Development   Commission  of   the   City of
16 Chicago  at   its   meeting  of  October   13th, 2009.
17 Notice   of   this   meeting   of   the Joint
18 Review  Board  was   also  provided  by certified
19 mail   to  each  taxing  district representative
20 on  the  board,   which  includes   the Chicago
21 Board  of  Education,   the  Chicago Community
22 Colleges,   District   508,   the   Chicago Park
23 District,   Cook   County,   the   City  of Chicago,
24 and   the   public   member.     Public   notice   of this
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
3
1 meeting  was  also posted  as  of Wednesday,
2 November  4th,   2009   in  various locations
3 throughout   City Hall.
4 Our  first   order  of  business   is to
5 select   a  chairperson   for   this  Joint Review
6 Board,   are  there  any nominations?
7 MS.   MAREK:      I   nominate   Tanya Anthony.
8 MS.   ANTHONY:      Is   there   a   second for
9 the nomination?
10 MS.   P ENA:     Martha Pena.
11 MR.   SCHNEIDER:     John  Schneider, Cook
12 County.
13 MR.   THURMAN:     Francis   Thurman, City
14 Colleges  of Chicago.
15 MS.   ANTHONY:      For   the   record  my name
16 is   Tanya  Anthony.     I   am   the   representative of
17 the   Chicago  Park  District,   which under
18 Section   117445   of   the   tax Increment
19 Allocation  Redevelopment  Act   is  one  of the
20 statutorily  designated  members   of   the Joint
21 Review  Board.     Until   election  of a
22 chairperson   I  will  moderate   the  Joint Review
23 Board meetings.
24 For   the   record   there  will   be two
LeGRAND REPORTING S, VIDEO SERVICES   (630} 894-9389
 
4
1 meetings  of   the  Joint  Review Board. This
2 first  meeting,   the   first  meeting  is   to review
3 the  proposed  Ewing  Avenue  Tax Increment
4 Finance  District.     The  date  of  this meeting
5 was  announced  at   and  set  by  the Community
6 Development   Commission  of   the   City of
7 Chicago  at   its  meeting  on  October   13th, 2009.
8 Notice   of   this  meeting  of   the Joint
9 Review  Board  was   also  provided  by certified
10 mail   to  each  taxing  district  represented on
11 the  board,   which  includes   the  Chicago Board
12 of   education,   the   Chicago Community
13 Colleges,   District   508,   the   Chicago Park
14 District,   Cook  County,   and  the   City of
15 Chicago.     Public   notice   of   this   meeting was
16 also  posted  as   of  Wednesday,   November 4th,
17 2009   in  various   locations   throughout City
18 Hall.
19 When  a  proposed  redevelopment plan
20 would  result   in   displacement   of residents
21 from  10  or  more  inhabited  residential units,
22 or  would  include   75   or  more inhabited
2 3 residential   units,   the   TIF  Act   requires that
24 the  public  member  of   the  Joint   Review Board
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630)   894-93 89
 
5
1 must  reside  in  the proposed redevelopment
2 project area.
3 In  addition,   a municipalities
4 housing  impact   study,   in  addition,   if a
5 municipalities  housing   impact study
6 determines   that   the  majority  of residential
7 units   in  the  proposed  redevelopment project
8 area  are  occupied by  very  low,   low or
9 moderate   income  households,   as  defined in
10 Section   3   of   the   Illinois   Affordable Housing
11 Act,   the  public  member  must  be  a  person who
12 resides   in  very  low,   low,   or  moderate income
13 housing  with  the  proposed redevelopment
14 project area.
15 With  us   today   is   Martha   Pena. Are
16 you   familiar  with  the  boundaries   of the
17 proposed  Ewing  Avenue  Tax Increment
18 Financing   Redevelopment   Project Area?
19 MS.   PENA: Yes.
20 MS.   ANTHONY:      Okay.      What   is the
21 address   of  your  primary residence?
22 MS.   PENA:      10648   South Ewing.
23 MS.   ANTHONY:      Is   such  address within
24 the   boundaries   of   the   proposed   Ewing Avenue
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
6
1 Tax  Increment  Financing Redevelopment
2 Proj ect Area?
3 MS.    PENA:      Yes.
4 MS.   ANTHONY:     Have   you provided
5 representatives  of  the  City  of Chicago's
6 Department  of   Community  Development with
7 accurate   information  concerning  your income
8 and  the   income  of   any  other  members  of the
9 household  residing  at   such address?
10 MS.    PENA:      Yes.
11 MS.   ANTHONY:     Ms.   Pena,   are you
12 willing   to   serve   as   the  public  member   for the
13 Joint  Review Board  for   the  proposed Ewing
14 Avenue  Tax   Increment   Financing Redevelopment
15 Project Area?
16 MS.   PENA: Yes.
17 MS.   ANTHONY:      I   will   entertain a
18 motion  that  Martha  Pena  be  selected  as the
19 public  member.     Is   there   a motion?
20 MS.   MARE K :      So moved.
21 MS.   ANTHONY:     Is   there  a second?
22 MS.   PERALTA: Second.
23 MS.   ANTHONY:     All   in   favor please
24 vote   by   saying aye.
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630)   8 94-9389
 
7
1 (Chorus  of ayes.)
2 MS.   ANTHONY:     All   opposed  please vote
3 by  saying no.     Let  the  record  reflect that
4 Martha  Pena  has  been  selected  as  the public
5 member  for  the  proposed  Ewing Avenue Tax
6 Increment  Financing  Redevelopment Project
7 Area.
8 Our  next  order  of  business   is to
9 select   a   chairperson  for  this  Joint Review
10 Board.     Are   there   any nominations?
11 MS.   MAREK:      I'll   nominate Tanya
12 Ant hony.
13 MS.   ANTHONY:      Is   there   a   second for
14 the nomination?
15 MR.    SCHNEIDER:      I'll second.
16 MS.   ANTHONY:     Are   there   any other
17 nominations?     Let   the   record  reflect that
18 there  were  no  other  nominations.     All in
19 favor of the nomination please vote by saying 2 0 aye .
21 (Chorus   of ayes.)
22 MS.   ANTHONY:      All   opposed   please vote
23 by  saying  no.     Let   the   record  reflect   that I,
24 Tanya  Anthony,   have   been   selected as
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
8
1 chairperson  and will  now serve  as the
2 chairperson  for  the  remainder  of the
3 meeting.
4 As   I  mentioned,   at   this  meeting we
5 will  be  reviewing  a  plan  for  the proposed tax
6 increment   financing  district  proposed  by the
7 City  of   Chicago.     Staff   of   the City's
8 Departments  of   Community Development and
9 Law,   and  other  departments   have reviewed
10 this   plan  which  was   introduced  to   the City's
11 Community  Development   Commission  on October
12 13th,   2009.     We  will   listen   to   a presentation
13 by  the  consultant   on  the  plan.     Following the
14 presentation  we   can   address   any questions
15 that   the  members   might   have   for the
16 consultant   or   city staff.
17 An  amendment   to   the   TIF   requires us
18 to  have,   to  base  our  recommendations to
19 approve   or  disapprove   the   proposed Ewing
20 Avenue  Tax   Increment   Financing  District on
21 the  basis  of   the  area  and  the  plan satisfying
22 the  plan  requirements,   the eligibility
23 criteria   defined   in   the   TIF  Act and
24 objectives   of   the   TIF Act.
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
9
1 If  the  board approves  the  plan, the
2 board will  then  issue  an  advisory non-
3 binding  recommendation  by  the  vote  of the
4 majority  of  those  members  present and
5 voting.     Such  recommendation  shall be
6 submitted  to  the   City within  30   days after
7 the  board meeting.
8 Failure  to  submit such
9 recommendation  shall  be   deemed  to constitute
10 approval  by  the  board.     If   the board
11 disapproves   the  plan  the  board  must   issue a
12 written  report   describing  why  the  plan and
13 area  failed  to meet   one   or  more  of the
14 objectives  of   the  TIF  Act,   and  both  the plan
15 requirements  and  the  eligibility  criteria of
16 the   TIF Act.
17 '   The   City  will   then  have   30   days to
18 resubmit   a  revised  plan.     The  board  and the
19 City  must  also  confer  during  this   time   to try
20 to  resolve  the   issues   that   led  to  the board's
21 disapproval.     If   such   issues   cannot be
22 resolved  or   if   the   revised  plan is
23 disapproved,   the   City  may  proceed  with the
24 plan,   but   the   plan  can  be   approved  only with
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
10
1 a  three-fifths  vote  of   the  City counsel,
2 excluding positions  of  members  that are
3 vacant   and  those  members   that   are ineligible
4 to  vote   because  of   conflict   of interest.
5 At   this   time  we'll   have a
6 presentation  by  the  consultant   on  the Ewing
7 Avenue  TIF  Redevelopment   Project Area.
8 MS.   MORONEY:     Good morning.     My name
9 is  Ann  Moroney  and  I'm  with  the   firm of
10 Johnson's  Research  Group.     We  were  hired by
11 the  City  to  undertake   the   feasibility study
12 for   the   Ewing  Avenue   study  area,   and joined
13 in  that   study  by  the   firm  of   ERS, Ernest
14 Sawyer Enterprises.
15 I'm  here   today   to   talk   to  you about
16 the  project   area.     The   Ewing Avenue project
17 area  pictured  here   is   located  entirely  in the
18 Tenth Ward  on  the   far   southeast   side of
19 Chicago,   and   it   covers   the  east   side and
20 Hegewisch   community  areas.      It's   adjacent to
21 two  existing  TIF's  Lake   Calumet  which is,
22 covers   the  vast  majority  of   the  areas around
23 of   and  north   following   it   along,   and then
24 126th  and   Torrence   TIF  which   is   the southwest
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
11
1 end of  the  TIF area.
2 The  proposed   study  area   is   348 acres
3 in  size,   and  it  generally  runs  along the
4 major  corridors  of   the  community.     It has
5 1,116   tax  parcels   in  it   and  it's  made  up of
6 an   improved  area  and  a  vacant   area for
7 purposes  of  eligibility analysis.
8 On  the  map  here   in  the   lighter blue
9 you   see   the   improved  area  which  makes  up the
10 majority  of   the   area,   and   the  vacant   area is
11 on  the  southeast  end.     The   improved  area we
12 found  qualifies   as   a   conservation area.
13 There  are   four  factors   that   are  present   to a
14 meaningful   degree   and  reasonably distributed
15 throughout   the   improved   area,   those include
16 deterioration  and  with  utilities, declining
17 EAV   and   lack  of   community  planning.     It also
18 meets   the  Threshold  H  criteria  that requires
19 50   percent   or  more  of   the   buildings   be 35
20 years  of   age  or  older.     In  this improved
21 portion,   88  percent   of   the   buildings   are 35
22 years   of   age  or older.
23 The  vacant  area,   located  down  here in
24 the   blue,   is   largely   industrial zoned
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
12
1 property  that  has  never been developed, that
2 includes  44.5  acres,   and  that  area, vacant
3 area  has  to  qualify  under  one  of   two   sets of
4 criteria,   this   qualifies   under both  sets of
5 criteria   for  vacant area.
6 Some   of   the   supporting   evidence of
7 disinvestment   in  the   area  is   exemplified by
8 the   large  number  of  vacant   lots throughout
9 the  area.     There  has   been  minimal new
10 construction  in  the   last   five  years  and there
11 are  additional   factors  that  are present,
12 although  concentrated   in   the commercial
13 corridors  of   the  area.     And while   they  have a
14 large,   while   they  have   an   impact   on  the area
15 as   a  whole,   we   were   not   able   to   say  that they
16 were  reasonably distributed  throughout the
17 improved area.
18 Some  of   the  goals   and  objectives for
19 the  project  area,   the   reasons   for  setting up
20 this  TIF district   is  to,   is  that   the area,
21 one   is  that   the   area   is   large,   in  need, in
22 significant  need  of   a   new  school,   new school
23 facilities.     Gallistel   School   is  one   of the,
24 one   of   the   most   overcrowded   schools   in the
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
13
1 City,   and the  hope  is  that  we  can provide a
2 new  school  facility  in  the  area,   where also . 3 some  of   the  goals   include   constructing the
4 commercial   face  of   the  project   area, the
5 commercial  corridors  of   106th, Indianapolis
6 and  Ewing Avenue  particularly  have suffered
7 from  disinvestment   and who  would benefit
8 from   this   TIF.
9 Also,   as   the  gateway  to  Chicago and
10 to   the  community  from  Indiana  and other
11 southern  communities,   this  would benefit
12 from   improvements   to   its image,
13 functionality,   corridors   and   sustainabi1ity
14 of   its   arterial   corridors.     And   then lastly,
15 to   support     residential   development wherever
16 possible.
17 The   current   EAV  or   the   2007   EAB,
18 which  was  what  was   available  as   of the
19 writing  of   this   plan   is   $58.6   million. We
20 have  projected  that   after  some conservative
21 assumptions  about   development   in  the area,
22 that   in  2033,   the   final  year  of   the  TIF, EAB
23 could  be   as  much   as   $233   million.     That leads
24 us   to  provide   a   budget   for   project cost
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
14
1 redevelopment  activity with  this  area  of $82
2 million.
3 As  part   of   this  project  we,   we  did a
4 housing   impact   study.     There  are  75, well
5 there  are  more  than  75  occupied housing
6 units,   so  a  housing   impact   study was
7 undertaken  by  Ernest   Sawyer  Enterprises for
8 us,   and  it  was   found  that   there  are 760
9 residential   units,   726   of   those residential
10 units   are  occupied.     There  are  no  plans to
11 displace  any  of   these   occupied residents,
12 however  as  part   of   the  methodology  that was
13 done  with  the  plan,   we  did  identify that
14 there   was   one   dilapidated  building,   or one
15 unit  within  a  dilapidated  building that,
16 that   would  be   a   possible displacement.
17 And  we   also   identified  in  the future
18 land  use   a  change   from  the  existing   land use
19 that   would  cause   a  second  unit   to be
20 displaced   if   ever   those,   if   ever development
21 activity  is  carried  through  in   that manner.
22 So,   that   kind  of  wraps  up  the, the
23 bulk   of   the  presentation.      If   there's any
24 questions   I'd  be   happy   to   answer those.
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
15
1 MR.   SCHNEIDER:     On  your  budget   of $82
2 million,   and  I   applaud you  for  what you're
3 looking  to  do,   how  is   this   area,   give  me some
4 ideas   in  terms  of  projects  or  what you're
5 looking  at   doing   in  this   area  that's  going to
6 create  $82   million  of   expendable dollars.
7 MS.   MORONEY:     Well   there's   a larger
8 area  for,   industrial   area   for industrial
9 development,   prime   area   for industrial
10 development.     It's  not  hampered by
11 environmental   contamination  and  it has
12 access   in  proximity  to  other industrial
13 areas   so   that   we   feel   that   it   would  work well
14 to  serve  as   a  compatible  or  comparable   use in
15 that   area,   that   will  bring significant
16 dollars   we   could  achieve   that development,
17 residential   development,   and  then  there's a
18 number  of   spots   for  commercial development
19 in or   redevelopment  of   existing areas,
20 particularly  along   Indianapolis Boulevard
21 where  you   can   take   advantage   both  of the
22 access   to   and   from  the   skyway  and --
23 MR.   SCHNEIDER:      So,    in   terms   of the
24 industrial   area   that   you're   talking about,
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
16
1 the  water  table  is  about  one  foot  below the
2 surface   level.     Is  there  money  in  here to
3 deal  with  the   lack  of  water  and  sewers on
4 that  property  and  also  deal  with,   not the
5 environmental   issue,   but   the  high water
6 table?
7 MS.   MORONEY:     We   have   not,   we've not
8 drawn  up  estimates   as  part  of   this   study, so
9 I   can't   answer that.
10 MR.   SCHNEIDER:      Okay. Thanks.
11 MS.   PERALTA:     That   industrial area,
12 is   it   abandoned  or --
13 MS.   MORONEY:      It's  never been
14 developed.
15 MS.   PERALTA:      Then   why   is   it,   why is
16 it   deemed  an  industrial   area   if   it's never
17 been   an   industrial area?
18 MS.   MORONEY:      Well   it's zoned
19 industrial.
2 0 MS.    PERALTA:      Oh.
21 MS.   MORONEY:     This   area   south  of 18th
22 Street   is   industrial.     Over  here  you  have --
23 over  here   you   have,   you   know,   industry, so
24 this   is   your,   this   is   your   residential that
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
17
1 ends  right  here,   and  from  a planning
2 standpoint   it  makes   sense   to  do this.
3 However,   there  is  a  natural  area over  here, a
4 state  park,   Wolf   Lake,   so serious
5 consideration,   careful   consideration  has to
6 be  done  to what  kind  of  an  industry goes in
7 there,   especially   --   residential  and  so you
8 have  to  be  careful  not   to --
9 MS.   ANTHONY:      That's   south   of 118th
10 Street, right?
11 MS.   MORONEY :      Yes.      Did   I   say 17th?
12 MS.   ANTHONY: 18th.
13 MS.      MORONEY:      18th,   oh,   add 100
14 blocks --
15 MS.   ANTHONY:     Okay.     Based  upon the
16 presentation  are   there  any  other questions?
17 Okay,   if  there  are  no   further  questions I
18 will   entertain  a  motion   that   this joint
19 review  board   finds   the   proposed  Ewing Avenue
20 Tax   Increment   Financing Redevelopment
21 Project   Area   satisfies   the redevelopment
22 plan  requirements  under   the  TIF  Act, the
23 eligibility  criteria  defined  in Section
24 117443   of   the   TIF  Act   and  objectives   of the
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
1 TIF  Act,   and  that  based  on   such findinc
2 approve   such  proposed  plan  under  the TI
3 Is   there  a motion?
4 MS.   MARE K:     So moved.
5 MS.   ANTHONY:     Is   there   a second
6 the motion?
7 MS.   MARE K:     I'll second.
8 MS.   ANTHONY:     Is   there   any furt
9 discussion?     If  not,   all   in  favor pleas
10 bysayi ng aye.
11 (Chorus  of .ayes.)
12 MS.   ANTHONY:      All   opposed pleas
13 by  saying  no.     Let   the   record  reflect t
14 Joint  Review' Board's  approval   of the
15 proposed  Ewing Avenue   Tax Increment
16 Financing  Redevelopment   Project  Area un
17 the   TIF Act.
18 At   this   time.I'll  adjourn   the m<
19 for   the  Ewing  Avenue  Joint  Review Board
20 (Whereupon  the  above matter
21 concluded   at   10:20 a.m.)
 
55
1 STATE   OF   ILLINOIS )
2 ) SS
3 COUNTY   OF   C   O   O   K )
5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8
1 9
2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4
I,   CAROL  ROBERTSON,   depose and say  that   I   am  a  direct   record  court reporter doing business   in  the  State  of   Illinois; that I   reported  verbatim  the foregoing proceedings   and  that   the   foregoing  is  a true and  correct   transcript   to   the  best   of my knowledge  and ability.
 
CAROL ROBERTSON
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE   ME THIS
DAY OF
A
. D .    2 0 6?
 
NOTARY PUBLIC
OFFICIAL SEAL RONALD N. LEGRAND.JR. Notary Public - State of Illinois jMy Commission Expires Ocl 03, 201 o!
LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES   (630) 894-9389
 
ATTACHMENT K
CITY OF CHICAGO. ILLINOIS
EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FINANCIAL REPORT
DECEMBER 31. 2010
 
CITY OF CHICAGO. ILLINOIS
EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
CONTENTS
Page
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 1-2
Management's discussion and analysis                  — - 3-5
Statement of net assets and governmental fund balance sheet 6 Statement of activities and governmental fund revenues,
expenditures and changes in fund balance 7
Notes to financial statements 8-10
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Schedule of expenditures by statutory code 11
 
Bansley and Kiener, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants
o'hare plaza 8745 west higgins road, suite 200 chicago, illinois 6063 i
AREA CODE 312 263.2700
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
The Honorable Rahm Emanuel, Mayor Members of the City Council City of Chicago, Illinois
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project of the City of Chicago, Illinois, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the City of Chicago's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project and do not purport to, and do not present fairly the financial position of the City of Chicago, Illinois, as of December 31, 2010, and the changes in its financial position for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project of the City of Chicago, Illinois, as of December 31, 2010, and the changes in financial position thereof for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Management's Discussion and Analysis on pages 3 through 5 is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it.
 
The Honorable Rahm Emanuel, Mayor Members of the City Council
-2-
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule of expenditures by statutory code on page 11, which is also the responsibility of the City of Chicago's management, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements of Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project of the City of Chicago, Illinois. Such additional information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
 
Certified Public Accountants
June 9, 2011
 
3
CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
As management of the Ewing Avenue Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area (Project), we offer the readers of the Project's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the Project's financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2010. Please read it in conjunction with the Project's financial statements, which follow this section.
Overview of the Financial Statements
This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the Project's basic financial statements. The Project's basic financial statements include three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) governmental fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information concerning the Project's expenditures by statutory code.
Basic Financial Statements
The basic financial statements include two kinds of financial statements that present different views of the Project - the Government-Wide Financial Statements and the Governmental Fund Financial Statements. These financial statements also include the notes to the financial statements that explain some of the information in the financial statements and provide more detail.
Government-Wide Financial Statements
The government-wide financial statements provide both long-term and short-term information about the Project's financial status and use accounting methods similar to those used by private-sector companies. The statement of net assets includes all of the project's assets and liabilities. All of the current year's revenues and expenses are accounted for in the statement of activities regardless of when cash is received or paid. The two government-wide statements report the Project's net assets and how they have changed. Net assets - the difference between the Project's assets and liabilities - is one way to measure the Project's financial health, or position.
Governmental Fund Financial Statements
The governmental fund financial statements provide more detailed information about the Project's significant funds - not the Project as a whole. Governmental funds focus on: 1) how cash and other financial assets can readily be converted to cash flows and 2) the year-end balances that are available for spending. Consequently, the governmental fund statements provide a detailed short-term view that helps determine whether there are more financial resources that can be spent in the near future to finance the Project. Because this information does not encompass the additional long-term focus of the government-wide statements, we provide additional information at the bottom of the statements to explain the relationship (or differences) between them.
 
4
CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS EWING AVENUF RFOEVELOPMENT PROJECT
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Notes to the Financial Statements
The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and governmental fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements follow the basic financial statements.
Other Supplementary Information
In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents a schedule of expenditures by statutory code. This supplementary information follows the notes to the financial statements.
Condensed Financial Statements
The condensed financial statements are presented on the following page. Analysis of Overall Financial Position and Results of Operations
Condensed comparative financial statements are not provided as this is the first year of financial activity for the Project. Property tax revenue for the Project was $0 for the year. The change in net assets produced an increase in net assets of $647,046. The Project's net assets increased to $647,046 making that amount of funding available to be provided for purposes of future redevelopment in the Project's designated area.
 
CITY OF CHICAGO. ILLINOIS EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED) (Concluded)
Government-Wide
Total assets Total liabilities Total net assets
Total revenues Total expenses Operating transfers in Changes in net assets Ending net assets
 
6
CITY OF CHICAGO ILLINOIS EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS AND GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31. 2010
Cash and investments
ASSETS
Governmental
Fund Adjustments
$    647,046 $
Statement of
Net Assets $ 647,046
FUND BALANCE/NET ASSETS
Fund balance: Designated for future redevelopment project costs
Total fund balance
Net assets: Restricted for future redevelopment project costs
647,046
$ 647,046
(647,046)
647,046
647,046
Total net assets
$   647,046      $ 647,046
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
7
CITY OF CHICAGO. ILLINOIS EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES AND GOVERNMENTAL FUND REVENUES. EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
Governmental Statement of
Fund Adjustments Activities
Revenues $ -        $        - $
Expenditures/expenses:
Economic development projects 1,126,410 _- 1,126,410
Excess of expenditures over revenues (1,126,410) - (1,126,410)
Other financing sources:
Operating transfers in (Note 2) 1,773,456 _-__ 1,773,456
Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures 647,046
Change in net assets
(647,046)
647,046 647,046
Fund balance/net assets:
Beginning of year _- _- _^_
End of year $    647,046     $ $ 647,046
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS EWING AVENUE REDEVEI OPMENT PROJECT
8
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Reporting Entity
In March 2010, the City of Chicago (City) established the Ewing Avenue Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area (Project). The area has been established to finance improvements, leverage private investment and create and retain jobs. The Project is accounted for within the special revenue funds of the City.
(b) Government-Wide and Fund Financial Statements
The accompanying financial statements of the Project have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). In June 1999, the GASB unanimously approved Statement No. 34 (as amended by Statement No. 37), Basic Financial Statements - Management's Discussion and Analysis - for State and Local Governments and at a later date, Statement No. 38 Certain Financial Statements Disclosures, and include the following:
A Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section providing an analysis of the Project's overall financial position and results of operations.
Government-wide  financial  statements  prepared  using  the  economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting for all the Project's activities. Fund financial statements, which focus on the Project's governmental funds current financial resources measurement focus.
(c) Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statements Presentation
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied.
The governmental fund financial statements are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting with only current assets and liabilities included on the balance sheet. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recorded when susceptible to accrual, i.e., both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Available means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Property taxes are susceptible to accrual and recognized as a receivable in the year levied. Revenue recognition is deferred unless the taxes are received within 60 days subsequent to year-end. Expenditures are recorded when the liability is incurred.
Private-sector standards of accounting and financial reporting issued prior to December 1, 1989, generally are followed in government-wide financial statements to the extent that those standards do not conflict with or contradict guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. The City has elected not to follow subsequent private-sector guidance.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources, as they are needed.
 
CITY OF CHICAGO. ILLINOIS EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
9
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Concluded)
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.
(d) Assets, Liabilities and Net Assets Cash and Investments
Cash belonging to the City is generally deposited with the City Treasurer as required by the Municipal Code of Chicago. The City Comptroller issues warrants for authorized City expenditures which represent a claim for payment when presented to the City Treasurer. Payment for all City warrants clearing is made by checks drawn on the City's various operating bank accounts.
The City Treasurer and City Comptroller share responsibility for investing in authorized investments. Interest earned on pooled investments is allocated to participating funds based upon their average combined cash and investment balances.
The City values its investments at fair value or amortized cost. U.S. Government securities purchased at a price other than par with a maturity of less than one year are reported at amortized cost.
Capital Assets
Capital assets are not capitalized in the governmental fund but, instead, are charged as current expenditures when purchased. The Government-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net assets and the statement of changes in net assets) of the City includes the capital assets and related depreciation, if any, of the Project in which ownership of the capital asset will remain with the City (i.e. infrastructure, or municipal building). All other construction will be expensed in both the government-wide financial statements and the governmental fund as the City nor Project will retain the right of ownership.
(e) Stewardship, Compliance and Accountability
Illinois Tax Increment Redevelopment Allocation Act Compliance
The Project's expenditures include reimbursements for various eligible costs as described in subsection (q) of Section 11-74.4-3 of the Illinois Tax Increment Redevelopment Allocation Act and the Redevelopment Agreement relating specifically to the Project. Eligible costs include but are not limited to survey, property assembly, rehabilitation, public infrastructure, financing and relocation costs.
Reimbursements
Reimbursements, if any, are made to the developer for project costs, as public improvements are completed and pass City inspection.
 
CITY OF CHICAGO. ILLINOIS EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
10
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Concluded)
Note 2 - Operating Transfers In
During 2010, in accordance with State statutes, the Project received $1,773,456 from the contiguous Lake Calumet Area Industrial Redevelopment Project for expenses for street resurfacing of Avenue O between 123rd Street and 126th Street.
 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
 
11
CITY OF CHICAGO. ILLINOIS EWING AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BY STATUTORY CODE
Code Description
Costs of the construction of public works or improvements
$1,126,410
 
 
ATTACHMENT L
BANSLEY AND  KlENER, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants
Established 1922
O'HARE PLAZA   8745 WEST HIGGINS ROAD   SUITE 200   CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60631    312.263.2700   FAX 31 2.263.6935 WWW.BK-CPA.COM
The Honorable Rahm Emanuel, Mayor Members of the City Council City of Chicago, Illinois
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the statement of net assets and governmental fund balance sheet of Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project of the City of Chicago, Illinois as of December 31, 2010, and the related statement of activities and governmental fund revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the year then ended, and have issued our report thereon dated June 9, 2011.
In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Project failed to comply with the regulatory provisions in Subsection (q) of Section 11-74.4-3 of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act and Subsection (o) of Section 11-74.6-10 of the Illinois Industrial Jobs Recovery Law as they relate to the eligibility for costs incurred incidental to the implementation of the Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project of the City of Chicago, Illinois.
This report is intended for the information of the City of Chicago's management. However, this report is a matter of public record, and its distribution is not limited.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
 
Certified Public Accountants
June 9, 2011
Members: American Institute of CPA's • Illinois CPA Society
An Independent Firm Associated with Moore Stephens
 
ATTACHMENT M
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS FY 2010
A list of all intergovernmental agreements in effect in FY 2010 to which the municpality is a part, and an accounting of any money transferred or received by the municipality during that fiscal year pursuant to those intergovernmental agreements. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (10)]_
Name of Agreement
Description of Agreement
Amount Transferred Out
Amount Received
None
 
 
 
FY 2010
TIF Name: Ewino Avenue Redevelopment Project Area
 
Ewing Avenue Redevelopment Project Area 2010 Annual Report