Office of the City Clerk - Record #: F2011-291

Record #:

F2011-291

Type:

Report

Status:

Placed on File

Intro date:

7/6/2011

Current Controlling Legislative Body:

Final action:

7/6/2011

Title:

Tax Increment Financing (TIF) West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Annual Report (2010)

Sponsors:

Dept./Agency

Topic:

TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS - West Woodlawn T.I.F.

Attachments:

1. F2011-291.pdf

Date	Journal Page Number	Action By	Action	Result	Action Details	Meeting Details	Captions
7/6/2011	2029	City Council	Placed on File		Action details	Meeting details	Not available

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR

CITY OF CHICAGO

JUN 30 2011

RAHM EMANUEL MAYOR

June 22, 2011

BY:

COMPTROLLER L.G.A.D.

Hand-delivered June M. Canello

TIF Administrator, Local Government Office of the Illinois Comptroller 100 West Randolph - Suite 15-500 Chicago, Illinois 60601

Re: Notice of the Designation of a City of Chicago TIF Administrator for Purposes of Filing the 2010 Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery Annual Reports for the City of Chicago (the "City")

Dear Ms. Canello:

This letter is intended to meet the requirements of your office as set forth in the "TIF Administrator Contact Information" section of your office's 'Tax Increment Finance Report Instructions" for fiscal year 2010.

Please be advised that the City's Department of Housing and Economic Development (the "Department"), which is the successor department to the prior Department of Community Development, has the primary responsibility for preparing and filing the Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery annual reports with the Illinois Comptroller as required by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4 et seq. and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6 et seq. The administrative head of the Department, and thus the TIF Administrator for the City, is the Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Economic Development (the "Commissioner").

Andrew J. Mooney has been the Commissioner of the Department since February 9,2011 and remains in that position to the present day. He is the TIF Administrator for the City for purposes of filing the City's 2010 Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery Annual Reports.

Sincerely,

Mayor

2010 Annual Report

West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area

Pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/ll-74.4-5(d)

June 30,2011

COM PTBOLUER

ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA

Name of Municipality: Chicago

County:Cook

UnitCode: 016/620/30

Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010 Fiscal Year End: 12/ 31 72010

First Name: Andrew J.

Address: City Hall 121 N. LaSalle

Telephone: (312)744-0025

E-Mail: TIFReports@cityofchicago.org

Last Name:'Mooney Title: TIF Administrator City: Chicago, IL

Zip: 60602

I attest to the best of hay knowledge, this report of the redevelopment project areas.in:

City/Village of Chicago _is complete and accurate at the end of this reporting

. Fiscal year under the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 et, seq.] ■ Or the industrial Jobs Recovery Law [65 ILCS 5/11 -74.6-10 et. seq.]

Written signature

J*f /--)

of TIF Aamlnisjfrator

Date

Section 1 (65 iLCS 5/11-74.4-5, (d) (1.5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (1.5)*)

FILL OUT OfJF FOR EACH I IF Dl >TFICT

Name of Redevelopment Project Area	Date Designated	Date Terminated
105th/Vincennes	10/3/2001	12/31/2025
111th Street/Kedzie Avenue Business District	9/29/1999	9/29/2022
119th and Halsted	2/6/2002	12/31/2026
119th/l-57	11/6/2002	12/31/2026
126th and Torrence	12/21/1994	12/21/2017
134th and Avenue K	3/12/2008	3/12/2032
24th/Michigan	7/21/1999	7/21/2022
26th and King Drive	1/11/2006	12/31/2030
35th and Wallace	12/15/1999	12/31/2023
35th/Halsted	1/14/1997	12/31/2021
35th/State	1/14/2004	12/31/2028
40th/State	3/10/2004	12/31/2028
43rd/Cottage Grove	7/8/1998	7/8/2021
45th/Western Industrial Park Conservation Area	3/27/2002	12/31/2026
47th/Ashland	3/27/2002	12/31/2026
47th/Halsted	5/29/2002	12/31/2026
47th/King Drive	3/27/2002	12/31/2026
47th/State	7/21/2004	12/31/2028
49th Street/St. Lawrence Avenue	1/10/1996	12/31/2020
51st/ Archer	5/17/2000	12/31/2024
53rd Street	1/10/2001	12/31/2025
60th and Western	5/9/1996	5/9/2019

"All statutory citations refer to one of two sections of the Illinois Municipal Code: el seq.] or the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law [65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-10 et. seq.]

the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3

James K/t'ltwiiiKim (.'enter l.oeal Go\ eminent l)ivi*im. Kill W. )Wjiilt.]|ill Slivei. .Suite I,>.;«> Otaasp. fi.Wtfior

Tel.! (!W7) 'Mi :WD> l_; Hit) 81 WifflS B-iimI: im^A^iiwTUK^I.ue.il.iK

COMPTROLLER w^Jte*titt,!l.w.'

ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA

Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010

County:Cook Fiscal Year End: 12/31 /2010

UnitCode: 016/620/30

63rd/Ashland	3/29/2006	12/31/2030
63rd/Pulaskl	5/17/2000	12/31/2024
67th/Clcero	10/2/2002	12/31/2026
69th/Ashland	11/3/2004	12/31/2028
71st and Stony Island	10/7/1998	10/7/2021
72nd and Cicero	11/17/1993	11/17/2016
73rd and Kedzie	11/17/1993	11/17/2016
73rd/Universlty	9/13/2006	12/31/2030
79th and Cicero	6/8/2005	7/8/2021
79th Street Corridor	7/8/1998	12/31/2025
79th Street/Southwest Highway	10/3/2001	12/31/2029
79thA/incennes	9/27/2007	12/31/2031
83rd/Stewart	3/31/2004	12/31/2028
87th/Cottage Grove	11/13/2002	12/31/2026
89th and State	4/1/1998	4/1/2021
95th and Western	7/13/1995	7/13/2018
95th Street and Stony Island	5/16/1990	5/16/2013
Addison Corridor North	6/4/1997	6/4/2020
Addison South	5/9/2007	12/31/2031
Archer Courts	5/12/1999	12/31/2023
Archer/ Central	5/17/2000	12/31/2024
Archer/Western	2/11/2009	12/31/2033
Armitage/Pulaski	6/13/2007	12/31/2031
Austin/Commercial	9/27/2007	12/31/2031
Avalon Park/South Shore	7/31/2002	12/31/2026
Avondale	7/29/2009	12/31/2033
Belmont/ Central	1/12/2000	12/31/2024
Belmont/Cicero	1/12/2000	12/31/2024
Bronzeville	11/4/1998	12/31/2022
Bryn Mawr/Broadway	12/11/1996	12/11/2019
Calumet Avenue/Cermak Road	7/29/1998	7/29/2021
Calumet River	3/10/210	12/31/2034
Canal/Congress	11/12/1998	12/31/2022
Central West	2/16/2000	12/31/2024
Chatham-Ridge	12/18/1986	12/31/2010 (1)
Chicago/ Kingsbury	4/12/2000	12/31/2024
Chicago/Central Park	2/27/2002	12/31/2026
Chicago Lakeside Development - Phase 1 (USX)	5/12/2010	12/31/2034
Chinatown Basin	12/18/1986	12/31/2010
Cicero/Archer	5/17/2000	12/31/2024
Clark Street and Ridge Avenue	9/29/1999	9/29/2022
Clark/Montrose	7/7/1999	7/7/2022
Commercial Avenue	11/13/2002	12/31/2026
Devon/Sheridan	3/31/2004	12/31/2028

(1)This TIF has been terminated; however, the sales tax portion continues to exist for the sole purpose of servicing outstanding obligations which may be retired early at which point the sales tax portion will also terminate.

ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPlNKA

Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010

County:Cook Fiscal Year End: 12/31 /2010

UnitCode: 016/620/30

Devon/Western	11/3/1999	12/31/2023
Diversey/ Narragansett	2/5/2003	12/31/2027
Division/Homan	6/27/2001	12/31/2025
Division/North Branch	3/15/1991	3/15/2014
Division-Hooker	7/10/1996	7/10/2019
Drexel Boulevard	7/10/2002	12/31/2026
Eastman/North Branch	10/7/1993	10/7/2016
Edgewater	12/18/1986	12/18/2009
Edgewater/ Ashland	10/1/2003	12/31/2027
Elston/Armstrong Industrial Corridor	7/19/2007	12/31/2031
Englewood Mall	11/29/1989	11/29/2012
Englewood Neighborhood	6/27/2001	12/31/2025
Ewing Avenue	3/10/2010	12/31/2034
Forty-first Street and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive	7/13/1994	7/13/2017
Fuilerton/ Milwaukee	2/16/2000	12/31/2024
Galewood/Armitage Industrial	7/7/1999	7/7/2022
Goose Island	7/10/1996	7/10/2019
Greater Southwest Industrial Corridor (East)	3/10/1999	12/31/2023
Greater Southwest Industrial Corridor (West)	4/12/2000	12/31/2024
Harlem Industrial Park Conservation Area	3/14/2007	12/31/2031
Harrison/Central	7/26/2006	12/31/2030
Hollywood/Sheridan	11/7/2007	12/31/2031
Homan/Grand Trunk	12/15/1993	12/15/2016
Homan-Arthington	2/5/1998	2/5/2021
Howard-Paulina	10/14/1988	10/14/2011
Humboldt Park Commercial	6/27/2001	12/31/2025
Irving Park/Elston	5/13/2009	12/31/2033
Irving/Cicero	6/10/1996	12/31/2020
Jefferson Park Business District	9/9/1998	9/9/2021
Jefferson/ Roosevelt	8/30/2000	12/31/2024
Kennedy/Kimball	3/12/2008	3/12/2032
Kinzie Industrial Corridor	6/10/1998	6/10/2021
Kostner Avenue	11/5/2008	11/5/2032
Lake Calumet Area Industrial	12/13/2000	12/31/2024
Lakefront	3/27/2002	12/31/2026
Lakeside/Clarendon	7/21/2004	12/31/2028
LaSalle Central	11/15/2006	12/31/2030
Lawrence/ Kedzie	2/16/2000	12/31/2024
Lawrence/Broadway	6/27/2001	12/31/2025
Lawrence/Pulaski	2/27/2002	12/31/2026
Lincoln Avenue	11/3/1999	12/31/2023
Lincoln-Belmont-Ashland	11/2/1994	11/2/2017
Little Village East	4/22/2009	12/31/2033
Little Village Industrial Corridor	6/13/2007	12/31/2031

ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA

Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010

CountyCook Fiscal Year End: 12/31 /2010

UnitCode: 016/620/30

Madden/Wells	11/6/2002	12/31/2026
Madison/Austin Corridor	9/29/1999	12/31/2023
Michigan/Cermak	9/13/1989	9/13/2012
Midway Industrial Corridor	2/16/2000	12/31/2024
Midwest	5/17/2000	12/31/2024
Montclare	8/30/2000	12/31/2024
Montrose/Clarendon	6/30/2010	12/31/2034
Near North	7/30/1997	7/30/2020
Near South	11/28/1990	12/31/2014
Near West	3/23/1989	12/31/2013
North Branch (North)	7/2/1997	12/31/2021
North Branch (South)	2/5/1998	2/5/2021
North Pullman	6/30/2009	12/31/2033
North-Cicero	7/30/1997	7/30/2020
Northwest Industrial Corridor	12/2/1998	12/2/2021
Ogden/Pulaski	4/9/2008	4/9/2032
Ohio/Wabash	6/7/2000	12/31/2024
Pershlng/KIng	9/5/2007	12/31/2031
Peterson/ Cicero	2/16/2000	12/31/2024
Peterson/ Pulaski	2/16/2000	12/31/2024
Pilsen Industrial Corridor	6/10/1998	12/31/2022
Portage Park	9/9/1998	9/9/2021
Pratt/Ridge Industrial Park Conservation Area	6/23/2004	12/31/2028
Pulaski Corridor	6/9/1999	6/9/2022
Randolph and Wells	6/9/2010	12/31/2034
Ravenswood Corridor	. 3/9/2005	12/31/2029
Read-Dunning	1/11/1991	12/31/2015
River South	7/30/1997	7/30/2020
River West	1/10/2001	12/31/2025
Roosevelt/Canal	3/19/1997	12/31/2021
Roosevelt/Cicero	2/5/1998	2/5/2021
Roosevelt/Racine	11/4/1998	12/31/2022
Roosevelt/Union	5/12/1999	5/12/2022
Roosevelt-Homan	12/5/1990	12/5/2013
Roseland/Michigan	1/16/2002	12/31/2026
Sanitary Drainage and Ship Canal	7/24/1991	7/24/2014
South Chicago	4/12/2000	12/31/2024
South Works Industrial	11/3/1999	12/31/2023
Stevenson/Brighton	4/11/2007	12/31/2031
Stockyards Annex	12/11/1996	12/31/2020
Stockyards Industrial Commercial	3/9/1989	3/9/2012
Stockyards Southeast Quadrant Industrial	2/26/1992	2/26/2015
Stony Island Avenue Commercial and Burnside Industrial Corridors	6/10/1998	6/10/2021
Touhy/Westem	9/13/2006	12/31/2030

C QMP.TROLLE R

ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA

Name of Municipality; Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010

County:Cook Fiscal Year End: 12 /31 /2010

UnitCode: 016/620/30

Weed/Fremont	1/8/2008	1/8/2032
West Grand	6/10/1996	6/10/2019
West Irving Park	1/12/2000	12/31/2024
West Pullman Industrial Park	3/11/1998	3/11/2021
West Ridge-Peterson Avenue	10/27/1986	12/31/2010
West Woodlawn	5/12/2010	12/31/2034
Western Avenue North	1/12/2000	12/31/2024
Western Avenue Rock Island	2/8/2006	12/31/2024
Western Avenue South	1/12/2000	12/31/2030
Western/Ogden	2/5/1998	2/5/2021
Wilson Yard	6/27/2001	12/31/2025
Woodlawn	1/20/1999	1/20/2022

COMPTROLLER

SECTION 2 [Sections 2 through 5 must be completed for each redevelopment project area listed in Section 1.]

Name of Redevelopment Project Area: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area

Primary Use of Redevelopment Project Area*: Combination/Mixed_"__

If "Combination/Mixed" List Component Types: Commercial/Residential___

Under which section ofthe Illinois Municipal Code was Redevelopment Project Area designated? (check one): Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act X _Industrial Jobs Recovery Law _

	No	Yes
Were there any amendments to the redevelopment plan, the redevelopment project area, or the State Sales Tax Boundary? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (1) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (1)] If ves, please enclose the amendment labeled Attachment A		X
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the municipality that the municipality has complied with all of the requirements ofthe Act during the preceding fiscal year. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (3) and 5/11-74.6 22 (d) (3)] Please enclose the CEO Certification labeled Attachment B	mmm i	X
Opinion of legal counsel that municipality is in compliance with the Act. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (4) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d)(4)] Please enclose the Leqal Counsel Opinion labeled Attachment C		X
Were there any activities undertaken in furtherance of the objectives of the redevelopment plan, including any project implemented in the preceding fiscal year and a description of the activities undertaken? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (A and B) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (A and B)] If ves, please enclose the Activities Statement labeled Attachment D		X
Were any agreements entered into by the municipality with regard to the disposition or redevelopment of any property within the redevelopment project area or the area within the State Sales Tax Boundary? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (C) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (C)] If ves, please enclose the Aqreement(s) labeled Attachment E		X
Is there additional information on the use of all funds received under this Division and steps taken by the municipality to achieve the objectives of the redevelopment plan? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (D) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d)(7) (D)] If ves, please enclose the Additional Information labeled Attachment F		X
Did the municipality's TIF advisors or consultants enter into contracts with entities or persons that have received or are receiving payments financed by tax increment revenues produced by the same TIF? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (E) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (E)] If yes, please enclose the contract(s) or description ofthe contract(s) labeled Attachment G	X
Were there any reports or meeting minutes submitted to the municipality by the joint review board? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (F) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (F)] If ves, please enclose the Joint Review Board Report labeled Attachment H		X
Were any obligations issued by municipality? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (8) (A) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (8) (A)] If yes, please enclose the Official Statement labeled Attachment I	X
Was analysis prepared by a financial advisor or underwriter setting forth the nature and term of obligation and projected debt service including required reserves and debt coverage? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (8) (B) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (8) (B)] If yes, please enclose the Analysis labeled Attachment J	X
Cumulatively, have deposits equal or greater than $100,000 been made into the special tax allocation fund? 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (2) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (2) If yes, please enclose Audited financial statements of the special tax allocation fund labeled Attachment K	X
Cumulatively, have deposits of incremental revenue equal to or greater than $100,000 been made into the special tax allocation fund? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (9) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (9)] If yes, please enclose a certified letter statement reviewing compliance with the Act labeled Attachment L	X
A list ot all intergovernmental agreements in effect in FY 2010, to which the municipality is a part, and an accounting of any money transferred or received by the municipality during that fiscal year pursuant to those intergovernmental agreements. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (10)] If yes, please enclose list only ofthe intergovernmental agreements labeled Attachment M		X

* Types include: Central Business District, Retail, Other Commercial, Industrial, Residential, and Combination/Mixed.

FY 2010 Section 2

SECTION 3.1 - (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5)) Provide an analysis ofthe special tax allocation fund.

| Reporting Year | Cumulative * |

Fund Balance at Beginning of Reporting Period Revenue/Cash Receipts Deposited in Fund During Reporting FY:

			% of Total
Property Tax Increment			0%
State Sales Tax Increment			0%
Local Sales Tax Increment			0%
State Utility Tax Increment			0%
Local Utility Tax Increment			0%
Interest			0%
Land/Building Sale Proceeds			0%
Bond Proceeds			0%
Transfers in from Municipal Sources (Porting in)			0%
Private Sources			0%
Other (identify source ; if multiple other sources, attach schedule)			0%

Total Amount Deposited In Special Tax Allocation Fund During Reporting Period

Cumulative Total Revenues/Cash Receipts

Total Expenditures/Cash Disbursements (Carried forward from Section 3.2)

Transfers out to Municipal Sources (Porting out)

Distribution of Surplus

Total Expenditures/Disbursements

NET INCOME/CASH RECEIPTS OVER/(UNDER) CASH DISBURSEMENTS FUND BALANCE, END OF REPORTING PERIOD

- if there is a positive fund balance at the end ofthe reporting period, you must complete Section 3.3

* Except as set forth in the next sentence, each amount reported on the rows below, if any, is cumulative from the inception of the respective Project Area. Cumulative figures for the categories of 'Interest,' 'Land/Building Sale Proceeds' and 'Other' may not be fully available for this report due to either of the following: (i) the disposal of certain older records pursuant to the City's records retention policy, or (ii) the availability of records only from January 1,1997 forward.

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevlopment Proiect Area

SECTION 3.2 A- (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5))

ITEMIZED LIST OF ALL EXPENDITURES FROM THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUND

(by category of permissible redevelopment cost, amounts expended during reporting period)

FOR AMOUNTS >$10,000 SECTION 3.2 B MUST BE COMPLETED

Category of Permissible Redevelopment Cost [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 (q) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-10 (o)]

Reporting Fiscal Year

1. Costs of studies, administration and professional servicesSubsections (q)(1) and (o) (1)	i -"it _} i *	¥\ V it W tl tf i*


		¹ f
		1 1
		- , .' ■-. '9


		$
2. Cost of marketing sitesSubsections (q)(1.6) and (o)(1.6)



		< , .


		t ft* 1 V"'"'
		$
3. Property assembly, demolition, site preparation and environmental site improvement costs. Subsection (q)(2), (o)(2) and (o)(3)		t'i *■? i -1




		(i *
		¹ i - ,
		* !
		$
4. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, repair or remodeling and replacement of existing public buildings. Subsection (q)(3) and (o)(4)	mmmmmm s	P#\|>llfli#«Mf«
		IF *f ^ T^uVi
		<



		, » ^ ~"

		$
5. Costs of construction of public works and improvements. Subsection (q)(4) and (o)(5)



		t ~ 1

		)f> !<■ ^x-r~J *_v «■ -iff

		$
6. Costs of removing contaminants required by environmental laws or rules (o)(6) - Industrial Jobs Recovery TIFs ONLY

		*


		t>; fi¹-
		^N i , ~ r
		> »
		$

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area

7. Cost of job training and retraining, including "welfare to work" programs Subsection (q)(5), (o)(7) and (o)(12)



		, _ti ;r~,;s v i j
		V i f
		«. " 14 *

		$
8. Financing costs. Subsection (q) (6) and (o)(8)

		! £ < f » ■ ! ■
		^ - ,"l


		UllHliiilllgliiSiil

		$
9. Approved capital costs. Subsection (q)(7) and (o)(9)
		mmmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmm.
		mmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmm
		$
10. Cost of Reimbursing school districts for their increased costs caused by TIF assisted housing projects. Subsection (q)(7.5) - Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY
		k mmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmmm
		wmmmmmmmm

		mmmmm ⁱ^fs?
		imnMMirm
		$
11. Relocation costs. Subsection (q)(8) and (o)(10)		mmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmm®
		mmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmm
		wmmmmmmmmm

		mmmmmm-:
		mmmmmmmmmm
		$
12. Payments in lieu of taxes. Subsection (q)(9) and (o)(11)	mmmmmmmm	wmmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmimm
		mmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmmm
		wmmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmmm
		wmmmmmwmmm
		mmmmmmmmm
		$
13. Costs of job training, retraining advanced vocational or career education provided by other taxing bodies. Subsection (q)(10) and (o)(12)	m^m§mmm	mmmmmmwsmm
		wmmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmm
		mmmmmmmmm

		mimmmmmsmmm
		mmmimmmmmmMm

		$

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area

14. Costs of reimbursing private developers for interest expenses incurred on approved redevelopment projects. Subsection (q)(11)(A-E) and (o)(13)(A-E)

		. > ^f

		, ■* «,J

		> l t*f" _f ^ ~r ^r

		$
15. Costs of construction of new housing units for low income and very low-income households Subsection (q)(11)(F) - Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY

		■




		i
		$
16. Cost of day care services and operational costs of day care centers. Subsection (q) (11.5) -Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY	> * >T t







		$

[TOTAL ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES I I $

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area

Section 3.2 B

List all vendors, Including other municipal funds, that were paid in excess of $10,000 during the current reporting year.

X_ There were no vendors, Including other municipal funds, paid in excess of

$10,000 during the current reporting period.

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevlopment Proiect Area

SECTION 3.3 - (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) 65 ILCS 11-74.6-22 (d) (5))

Breakdown ofthe Balance in the Special Tax Allocation Fund At the End ofthe Reporting Period (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) (D) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5) (D))

FUND BALANCE, END OF REPORTING PERIOD

Amount of Original Issuance

Amount Designated

Reserved for debt service	$	$

Total Amount Designated for Obligations

Designated for future redevelopment project costs		$

Total Amount Designated for Project Costs

TOTAL AMOUNT DESIGNATED SURPLUS*/(DEFICIT)

$ $

*NOTE: If a surplus is calculated, the municipality may be required to repay the amount to overlapping taxing districts.

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area

SECTION 4 [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (6) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (6)]

Provide a description of all property purchased by the municipality during the reporting fiscal year within the redevelopment project area.

Property Acquired by the Municipality Within the Redevelopment Project Area

Property (1):
Street address:	6714 S. Rhodes Aveune
Approximate size or description of property:	3,100 square ft.
Purchase price:
Seller of property:	N/A

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area

SECTION 5 - 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (G) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (G)

Please include a brief description of each project.

X No Projects Were Undertaken by the Municipality Within the Redevelopment Project Area

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area

ATTACHMENT A

11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107323

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR WEST WOODLAWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA.

[02010-6155]

The Committee on Finance submitted the following report:

CHICAGO, November 17, 2010.

To the President and Members ofthe City Council:

Your Committee on Finance, having had under consideration an ordinance authorizing the approval of an amendment to the West Woodlawn Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project, having had the same under advisement, begs leave to report and recommend that Your Honorable Body Pass the proposed ordinance transmitted herewith.

This recommendation was concurred in by a viva voce vote of the members of the Committee.

Respectfully submitted,

(Signed) EDWARD M. BURKE,

Chairman.

On motion of Alderman Burke, the said proposed ordinance transmitted with the foregoing committee report was Passed by yeas and nays as follows:

Yeas -- Aldermen Moreno, Fioretti, Dowell, Preckwinkle, Hairston, Lyle, Jackson, Harris, Beale, Pope, Balcer, Cardenas, Olivo, Burke, Foulkes, Thompson, Thomas, Lane, Rugai, Cochran, Brookins, Mufioz, Zaiewski, Dixon, Soils, Maldonado, Burnett, E. Smith, Graham, Reboyras, Suarez, Waguespack, Mell, Austin, Colon, Rice, Mitts, Allen, Laurino, O'Connor, Doherty, Reilly, Daley, Tunney, Levar, Shiller, Schulter, M. Smith, Moore, Stone - 50.

A/ays - None.

Alderman Pope moved to reconsider the foregoing vote. The motion was lost. The following is said ordinance as passed:

WHEREAS, The City of Chicago (the "City"), by an ordinance adopted by the City Council ofthe City (the "City Council") on May 12, 2010, approved a redevelopment plan and project (the "Original Plan") for a portion of the City known as the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "Original Redevelopment Project Area") for the purpose of implementing tax increment allocation financing ("Tax Increment Allocation Financing") pursuant to the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et. seq., as amended (the "Act"); and

WHEREAS, The City Council adopted an ordinance on May 12, 2010 designating the Ohginal Redevelopment Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act; and

107324

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

WHEREAS, The City Council adopted an ordinance on May 12, 2010 adopting Tax Increment Allocation Financing for the Original Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to the Act; and

WHEREAS, It is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens of the City for the City to encourage development of areas located adjacent to the Original Redevelopment Project Area by adding a certain additional parcel (the "Added Area") to the Original Redevelopment Project Area and designating such expanded project area as a redevelopment project area under the Act to be known as the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "Expanded Area"); and-

WHEREAS, The City desires further to supplement and amend the Original Plan for the Original Redevelopment Project Area to provide for the redevelopment of the Expanded Area; and

WHEREAS, The City has caused to be prepared an eligibility study entitled "West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment Number 1" and dated July 1, 2010 (the "Eligibility Study") of the Added Area, which Eligibility Study confirms the existence within the Added Area of various blighting factors as set forth in the Act and supports a finding of eligibility of the Added Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act; and

WHEREAS, The Original Plan, togetherwith the Eligibility Study (collectively, the 'Amended Plan"), provides for the Expanded Area; and

WHEREAS, A copy of the Amended Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and

WHEREAS, It is desirable and in the best interest of the citizens of the City for the City to implement Tax Increment Allocation Financing pursuant to the Act for the Expanded Area described in Section 2 of this ordinance, to be redeveloped pursuant to the Amended Plan; and

WHEREAS, The Community Development Commission (the "Commission") of the City has heretofore been appointed by the Mayor of the City with the approval of its City Council (collectively, the City Council and the Mayor are referred to herein as the "Corporate Authorities") (as codified in Section 2-124 of the City's Municipal Code) pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act; and

WHEREAS, The Commission is empowered by the Corporate Authorities to exercise certain powers enumerated in Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act, including the holding of certain public hearings required by the Act; and

WHEREAS, By authority of the Corporate Authorities in accordance with' Section 5/11-74.4-4.2 ofthe Act and pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) ofthe Act, the City's Department of Community Development established an interested parties registry and, on December 14, 2009, published in the Chicago Sun-Times or Chicago Tribune a notice that interested persons may register in order to receive information on the proposed designation ofthe Original Redevelopment Project Area or the approval ofthe Original Plan; and

WHEREAS, Notice of a public meeting (the "Public Meeting") was made pursuant to notices from the City's Commissioner of the Department of Community Development, given on dates not less than 15 days before the date of the Public Meeting: (i) on June 9, 2010 by certified

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107325

mail to all taxing districts having real property in the proposed Expanded Area and to all entities requesting that information that have taken the steps necessary to register to be included on the interested parties registry for the proposed Expanded Area in accordance -with Section 5/11-74.4-4.2 ofthe Act, and (ii) with a good faith effort, on June 11, 2010 by regular mail to all residents and the last known persons who paid property taxes on real estate in the proposed Expanded Area (which good faith effort was satisfied by such notice being mailed to each residential address and the person or persons in whose name property taxes were paid on real property for the last preceding year located in the proposed Expanded Area), which to the extent necessary to effectively communicate such notice, was given in English and in other languages; and

WHEREAS, The Public Meeting was held in compliance with the requirements of Section 5/11-74.4-6(e) ofthe Act on June 28,2010 at 6:00 P.M. at Dulles Elementary School, 6311 South Calumet Avenue, Chicago, Illinois; and

WHEREAS, The Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report attached thereto as an exhibit and, if applicable, the feasibility study and the housing impact study) was made available for public inspection and review pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-5(a) of the Act since July 2, 2010, being a date not less than 10 days before the meeting of the Commission at which the Commission adopted Resolution 10-CDC-46 on July 13, 2010, accepting the Amended Plan for review and fixing the time and place for a public hearing ("Hearing"), at the offices of the City Clerk, and the City's Department of Community Development; and

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act, notice ofthe availability of the Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report attached thereto as an exhibit and, if applicable, the feasibility study and the housing impact study) was sent by mail on July 30, 2010, which is within a reasonable time after the adoption by the Commission of Resolution 10-CDC-46 to: (a) all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, were determined to be (i) located within the Expanded Area and (ii) located within 750 feet of the boundaries ofthe Expanded Area (or, if applicable, were determined to be the 750 residential addresses that were closest to the boundaries of the Expanded Area); and (b) organizations and residents that were registered interested parties for such Expanded Area; and

WHEREAS, Due notice of the Hearing was given pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-6 of the Act, said notice being given to all taxing districts having property within the Expanded Area and to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity of the State of Illinois by certified mail on July 16, 2010, by publication in the C/i/'cago Sun-Times or C/j/cago Tribune on August 21, 2010 and August 28, 2010, by certified mail to taxpayers within the Expanded Area on August 31, 2010; and

WHEREAS, A meeting of the joint review board established pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(b) of the Act (the "Board") was convened upon the provision of due notice on August 6, 2010 at 10:00 A.M., to review the matters properly coming before the Board and to allow it to provide its advisory recommendation regarding the approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Expanded Area, and other matters, if any, properly before it; and

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Sections 5/11-74,4-4 and 5/11 .-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission held the Hearing concerning approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Expanded

107326

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Expanded Area pursuant to the Act on September 14, 2010; and

WHEREAS, The Commission has forwarded to the City Council a copy of its Resolution 10-CDC-52 attached hereto as Exhibit B, adopted on September 14, 2010, recommending to the City Council approval of the Amended Plan, among other related matters; and

WHEREAS, The Corporate Authorities have reviewed the Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report attached thereto as an exhibit and, if applicable, the feasibility study and the housing impact study), testimony from the Public Meeting and the Hearing, if any, the recommendation of the Board, if any, the recommendation ofthe Commission and such other matters or studies as the Corporate Authorities have deemed necessary or appropriate to make the findings set forth herein, and are generally informed of the conditions existing in the Expanded Area; now, therefore,

Be /f Orda/ned by the City Council ofthe City of Chicago:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

SECTION 2. The Expanded Area. The Expanded Area is legally described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein. The street location (as near as practicable) for the Expanded Area is described in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein. The map of the Expanded Area is depicted on Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated herein.

SECTION 3. Findings. The Corporate Authorities hereby make the following findings as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(n) of the Act:

a. The Expanded Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be expected to be developed without the adoption of the Amended Plan;

b. The Amended Plan:

(i) conforms to the comprehensive plan for the development of the City as a whole; or

(ii) either (A) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the Chicago Plan Commission or (B) includes land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission;

c. The Amended Plan meets all ofthe requirements of a redevelopment plan as defined in the Act and, as set forth in the Amended Plan, the estimated date of completion of the projects described therein and retirement of all obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs is not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in subsection (b) of Section 11-74.4-8 of the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year after the year in which the ordinance approving the Original Redevelopment Project Area was adopted, and, as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-7 of the Act, no such obligation shall have a maturity date greater than 20 years;

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107327

d. Within the Amended Plan, if applicable:

(i) as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(5) of the Act, the housing impact study: a) includes data on residential unit type, room type, unit occupancy, and racial and ethnic composition of the residents; and b) identifies the number and location of inhabited residential units in the Expanded Area that are to be or may be removed, if any, the City's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the Expanded Area whose residences are to be removed, the availability of replacement housing for such residents and the type, location, and cost of the replacement housing, and the type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided;

(ii) as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act, there is a statement that households of low-income and very low-income persons living in residential units that are to be removed from the Expanded Area shall be provided affordable housing and relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations under that Act, including the eligibility criteria.

SECTION 4. Approval Of The Amended Plan. The City hereby approves the Amended Plan pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act.

SECTION 5. Powers Of Eminent Domain. In compliance with Section 5/11-74.4-4(c) of the Act and with the Amended Plan, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to negotiate for the acquisition by the City of parcels contained within the Expanded Area. In the event the Corporation Counsel is unable to acquire any of said parcels through negotiation, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings to acquire such parcels. Nothing herein shall be in derogation of any proper authority.

SECTION 6. Invalidity Of Any Section. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance.

SECTION 7. Supersedes All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage.

[Exhibit "E" referred to in this ordinance printed on page 107435 of this Journal.]

Exhibits "A", "B", "C" and "D" referred to in ordinance read as follows:

107328

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Exhibit "A". (To Ordinance)

West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Eligibility, Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project

December 28, 2009 Revised: March 8, 2010. /. Executive Summary

In April 2009, S. B. Friedman & Company was engaged to conduct a Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Study (the "Eligibility Study") for the proposed West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "West Woodlawn RPA" or "RPA"). This report details the eligibility factors found within the proposed West Woodlawn RPA in support of its designation as a "conservation area" within the definitions set forth in the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74,4-1 et seq.j as amended (the "Act"), and thus in support of its designation as the West Woodlawn RPA. In addition, since the Eligibility Study has determined that the RPA qualifies as a conservation area, this report also contains the Redevelopment Plan and Project (the "Redevelopment Plan" or "Redevelopment Plan and Project") for the West Woodlawn RPA.

The West Woodlawn RPA is located almost wholly within the West Woodlavm Community Area ("Community Area") of the City of Chicago. A small portion of the RPA is located in the Greater Grand Grossing area. The RPA is generally bounded by East 60^,h Street on the north, Cottage Grove Avenue on the east, East 68^,h Street and South Chicago Avenue on the south, and Martin Luther King Drive and South Calumet Avenue on the west.

Determination of Eligibility

This Eligibility Study concludes that the West Woodlawn RPA is eligible for Tax Increment Financing .('TIF") designation as a "conservation area" because 50 percent or more of the structures in the area are 35 years in age or older and because the following four eligibility factors have been found to be present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA:

1. Deterioration

2. Inadequate Utilities

3. Structures Below Minimum Code

4. Lack of Community Planning

Redevelopment Plan Goal, Objectives, and Strategies

11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107329

reestablishment of the RPA as a cohesive and vibrant mixed-use area that provides a broad range of both housing opportunities and commercial/retail uses, while accommodating public and institutional uses where appropriate. Redevelopment of the RPA will improve retail, commercial, and housing conditions; improve the relationship between the area's land uses; and attract private redevelopment.

Objectives. Beven broad objectives support the overall goal of area-wide revitalization of the West Woodlawn RPA. These include:

1. Facilitate sustainable residential development and redevelopment that will accommodate current and future residents of the RPA, including a range of income levels and a variety of housing tenure (ownership versus rental);

2. Encourage high-quality retail development that promotes a lively pedestrian environment, incorporates enhanced plazas and green spaces, provides sufficient off-street parking, and . adequately serves households residing in the area;

3. Improve the quality and quantity of existing open space, plazas, and streetscape elements to provide the community with safe, attractive public gathering spaces;

4. Promote new commercial and residential development and redevelopment that is "transit-oriented" in nature and reflects site design and mixes of uses that promote transit ridership and accessibility

5. Provide resources for the rehabilitation and modernization of existing structures and the reuse and rehabilitation of architecturally and historically significant structures, especially those identified as "orange" on the Chicago Historic Resources Survey;

6. Provide resources for creation and/or improvement of community facilities to provide health/wellness, education, social support, and job training opportunities for RPA residents;

7. Improve vehicular circulation throughout the RPA, through improvements to streets, alleys and loading areas;

8. Improve public transit facilities within the RPA, including encouragement of upgrades to Chicago Transit Authority properties and facilities;

9. Replace or repair public infrastructure where needed, including streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, underground water and sanitary systems, alleys, bridges, and viaducts;

10. Provide opportunities for women-owned, minority-ovmed, and locally-owned businesses to share in job opportunities associated with the redevelopment of the West Woodlawn RPA, particularly in the design and construction industries; and

11. Support job training and welfare to work programs and increase employment opportunities for City and neighborhood residents;

107330

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Strategies. These objectives will be implemented through four specific and integrated strategies. These include:

1. Implement Public Improvements. A series of public improvements throughout the West Woodlawn RPA may be designed and implemented to build upon and improve the character of the area, and to. create a more conducive environment for private development. Public improvements that are implemented with TIF assistance are intended to complement and not replace existing funding sources for public improvements in the RPA. These improvements may include improvement of new streets, streetscaping, street and sidewalk lighting, alleyways, underground water and sewer infrastructure, parks or open space, and other public improvements consistent with the 'Redevelopment Plan and Project. These public improvements may be completed pursuant to redevelopment agreements with private entities or intergovernmental agreements with other public entities, and may include the construction, rehabilitation, renovation, or restoration of public improvements on one or more parcels.

2. Encourage Private Sector Activities and Support Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. Through the creation and support of public-private partnerships, or through written agreements, the City may provide financial and other assistance to encourage the private sector, including local property owners, to undertake rehabilitation and redevelopment projects and other improvements, in addition to programming such as job training and retraining, that are consistent with the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. The City may enter into redevelopment agreements or intergovernmental agreements with private or public entities to construct, rehabilitate, renovate, or restore private or public improvements on one or several parcels (collectively referred to as "Redevelopment Projects").

The City requires that developers who receive TIF assistance for market-rate housing set aside twenty percent (20 percent) of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Departmentof Community Development or any successor agency. Generally, this means that affordable for-sale housing units should be priced at a level that is affordable to persons earning no more than one hundred percent (100 percent) of the area median income, and affordable rental units should be affordable to persons earning no more than sixty percent (60 percent) of the area median income. TIF funds can also be used to pay for up to fifty percent (50 percent) ofthe cost'of construction or up to seventy five percent (75 percent) of interest costs for new housing units to be occupied by low-income and very low-income households as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act.

3. Develop Vacant and Underutilized Sites. The redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties within the West Woodlawn RPA is expected to stimulate private investment and increase the overall taxable value of properties within the RPA. Development of vacant and/or underutilized sites is anticipated to have a positive impact on other properties beyond the individual project sites.

4. Facilitate Property Assembly, Demolition, and Site Preparation. Financial assistance may be provided to private developers seeking to acquire land, and to assemble and prepare sites in order to undertake projects in support of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. To meet the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, the City may acquire

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107331

and assemble property throughout the RPA. Land assemblage by the City may be by purchase, exchange, donation, lease, eminent domain, through the Tax Reactivation Program, or other programs and may be for the purpose of (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers, or (b) sale, lease, conveyance, or dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Site preparation may include such preparatory work as demolition of existing improvements and environmental remediation, where appropriate. Furthermore, the City may require written redevelopment agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the City may devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and development.

Required Findings

The conditions required under the Act for the adoption of the Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project are found to be present within the West Woodlawn RPA.

1. The RPA has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise. Rehabilitation and construction activity within the RPA has been limited to a small number of buildings and the total value of these construction projects has been minimal relative to the estimated market value of the area.

2. Without the support of public resources, the redevelopment objectives of the West Woodlawn RPA will most likely not be realized. TIF assistance may be used to fund rehabilitation, infrastructure improvements, and expansions to public facilities. Without the creation of the West Woodlavm RPA, these types of projects are not likely to occur.

3. The West Woodlawn RPA includes only the contiguous real property that is expected to substantially benefit from the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Project improvements.

2. Introduction

The Study Area

This document serves as the Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project for the West Woodlawn RPA. The West Woodlavm RPA is located within the Woodlavm Community Area of the City of Chicago (the "City"), in Cook County (the "County"). In April 2009, & B. Friedman & Company was engaged to conduct a study of certain properties in these neighborhoods to determine whether the area containing these properties would qualify for status as a "blighted area" and/or "conservation area" under the Act.

The Eligibility Study and Plan summarizes the analyses and findings of S. B. Friedman & Company's work, which, unless otherwise noted, is the responsibility of S. B. Friedman & Company. The City is entitled to rely on the findings and conclusions of this Eligibility Study and Plan in designating the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area as a redevelopment proiect area under the Act. S. B. Friedman & Company has prepared this Plan and the related

107332 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Eligibility Study with the understanding that, the City would rely: 1) on the findings and conclusions of the Plan and the related Eligibility Study in proceeding with the designation of the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area and the adoption and implementation of the Plan, and 2) on the fact that S. B. Friedman & Company has obtained the necessary information so that the Plan and the related Eligibility Study will comply with the Act.

The community context of the West Woodlawn RPA is detailed on Map 1. The RPA is generally bounded by East 60^,h Street on the north, Cottage Grove Avenue on the east, East 68^th Street and South Chicago Avenue on the south, and Martin Luther King Drive and South Calumet Avenue on the west. The RPA consists of 2,284 tax parcels on 64 blocks, and is located wholly within the City.

Map 2 provides detail of the boundary of the West Woodlawn RPA, which includes only the contiguous real property that is expected to benefit substantially from the Redevelopment Plan and Project improvements discussed herein.

Appendix 1 contains a legal description of the West Woodlawn RPA.

The Eligibility Study covers events and conditions that exist and that were determined to support the designation of the West Woodlawn RPA as a "conservation area" under the Act at the completion of our research on September 3, 2009 and not thereafter. Events or conditions, such as governmental actions and additional developments, occurring after that date are excluded from the analysis. The improved parcels suffer from deterioration, inadequate utilities, and structures below minimum code. Without a comprehensive approach to address these issues, the RPA is not likely to see substantial private investment. The Redevelopment Plan and Project address these issues by providing the means to facilitate private development and rehabilitation, and the construction of public infrastructure.

These improvements will benefit all of the property within the RPA by alleviating conditions qualifying the RPA as a conservation area.

History of Community Area

The West Woodlawn RPA is located almost entirely within the Woodlawn Community Area in the City of Chicago. A small portion of the West Woodlawn RPA, located west of Martin Luther King Drive, is part of the Greater Grand Crossing Community Area.

The Woodlawn Community Area is located seven miles southeast of Chicago's Loop. It is bounded on the north by East 60^lh Street, on the east by South Drexel Avenue and South Cottage Grove Avenue, on the south by portions of East 67^th Street, East 68^,h Street and South Chicago Avenue, and on the west by South Martin Luther King Drive.

Woodlawn was originally settled in the 1850s by Dutch farmers. Over the next 40 years, the population remained stable between 500 and 1,000 residents until 1890. The area was annexed by the City of Chicago along with other parts of the Hyde Park Township in 1889.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107333

The decision in 1893 to host the World's Columbian Exposition in Jackson Park brought 20,000 new residents and entrepreneurs to Woodlawn. Large apartment buildings and tourist hotels were constructed in the area to support the Exposition. During this time, the Midway Plaisance and the Elevated rail line along East 63^rd Street was developed.

Following the closing of the fair, local boosters worked to heavily promote Woodlawn out of fear of an economic depression. Two commercial centers, the Washington Park Subdivision and the specialty shops along East 63^fd Street were developed to attract patrons to that area. The Washington Park Subdivision contained an amusement park, racetrack, and beer gardens that were popular in the early, part of the twentieth century. When gambling was outlawed in 1905, apartment houses replaced the racetrack in Washington Park. The specialty shops along East 63^rd Street attracted patrons from throughout Chicago.

Despite commercial improvements to the area, the Woodlawn area was primarily residential. University of Chicago faculty chose to reside in the residences in the area in the early twentieth century. New developments in the southwest part of the neighborhood attracted middle-class African-Americans, who had the vneans to buy homes outside the nearby Black Belt.

The economic decline and distress of the 1920s resulted in many of the East 63^rd Street businesses to fail. Taverns and similar businesses began to open and operate in these spaces and led to further neighborhood decline. In 1946, the Chicago Plan Commission designated Woodlawn eligible as a conservation area, but no plan was ever implemented to stall the neighborhood decline.

By the 1960s, Woodlawn had housing stock that was overcrowded, deteriorated, and had few commercial attractions that could support its population. The neighborhood also began to experience an increase in gang-related violence. In the 1960s, residents, in a coalition with churches, block clubs, and business owners worked with community organizers to improve the neighborhood and create local economic renewal.

Numerous arsons in the years following the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. resulted in more population decline in the neighborhood as people moved to other neighborhoods or communities. Woodlawn's population declined from a high of 81,279 in 1960 to 27,086 in 2000. Efforts have been underway in recent years to bring private development, commercial enterprises, and a bank back to Woodlawn with unsatisfactory results.

Existing Land Use

Based on S. B. Friedman & Company's research, six land uses have been identified within the West Woodlawn RPA:

Mixed Uses (Residential over Commercial)

Residential

■» Commercial Retail Uses

Institutional Uses (Churches, Schools, Medical Facilities and Utilities) a Right-of-ways

Vacant Land

107334

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

The existing land use pattern in the West Woodlawn RPA is shown in Map 3. This map represents the predominant land use in the area on a parcel_:by-parcel basis. The land use displayed was the land use most apparent during field observation.

Overall, the area contains mainly residential uses. Major arterials such as Martin Luther King Drive and Cottage Grove contain a mix of retail uses. Small one-story retail establishments are located throughout the RPA.

Historically Significant Structures

S. B. Friedman & Company obtained data from the Chicago Historic Resources Survey (CHRS) to identify architecturally and/or historically significant buildings located within the West Woodlawn RPA. The CHRS identifies over 17,000 Chicago properties and contains information on buildings that may possess important architectural and/or historical significance. A ranking system was used to identify historic and architectural significance according to three criteria adopted by the CHRS: 1) age; 2) degree of external physical integrity; and 3) level of possible significance.

According to this survey, seven (7) buildings in the West Woodlawn RPA have been identified by the CHRS as possessing some architectural feature or historical association that vnade them significant in the context of the. community. Several structures in the RPA are designated as Chicago Landmarks. The properties identified by the CHRS as having historic and architectural significance are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Historic Buildings in RPA

Name	Address	type of Building	Style	Year Built	CHRS j Color Code
King Drive El Station	400 E. 63^M Street	NA	NA	1890s	Orange
Private Residence	415 E. 60* Street	2-3 Flat	Classical Revival	1897	Orange
Private Residence	6156 S. Evans Avenue	2-3 Flat	Craftsman	1912	Orange
Private Residence	6330 S. Eberhart Avenue	2-3 Flat	Classical Revival	1905	Orange
Private Residence	6338 S. Evans Avenue	NA	NA	NA	Green
Private Residence	6354 S. Evans Avenue	Single Family Residence	Queen Anne	NA	Orange
St. Stefan's Danish Evangelical Lutheran Church	6359 S. Eberhart Avenue	Church	Gothic Revival	1907	Orange

Source: City of Chicago

The location of these historic buildings is detailed on Map 3, along with current land uses within the RPA.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107335

3. Eligibility Analysis

Provisions of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act

Based upon the conditions found within the West Woodlawn RPA at the completion of S. B. Friedman & Company's research, it has been determined that the West Woodlavm RPA meets the eligibility requirements of the Act as a "conservation area." The following text outlines the provisions ofthe Act to establish eligibility.

Under the Act, two primary avenues exist to establish eligibility for an area to permit the use of tax increment financing for area redevelopment: declaring an area as a "blighted area" and/or a "conservation area."

"Blighted areas" are those improved or vacant areas with blighting influences that are impacting the public safety, health, morals, or welfare of the community, and are substantially impairing the growth of the tax base in the area. "Conservation areas" are those improved areas which are deteriorating and declining and may become blighted if the deterioration is not abated.

The statutory provisions of the Act specify how a district can be designated as a "conservation" and/or "blighted area" district based upon an evidentiary finding of certain eligibility factors listed in the Act. The eligibility factors for each designation are identical for improved property. A separate set of factors exists for the designation of vacant land as a "blighted area." There is no provision for designating vacant land as a conservation area.

Factors for Improved Property

For improved property to constitute a "blighted area," a combination of five or more of the following 13 eligibility factors listed at 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 (a) must be present to a meaningful extent and (b) be reasonably distributed throughout the RPA. A "Conservation area" must have a minimum of fifty percent (50%) ofthe total structures within the area aged 35 years or older, plus a combination of three or more of the 13 eligibility factors which are detrimental to the public safety, health, morals, or welfare and which could result in such an area becoming a blighted area.

Dilapidation. An advanced state of disrepair or neglect of necessary repairs to the primary structural components of buildings or improvements in such a combination that a documented building condition analysis determines that major repair is required or the defects are so serious and so extensive that the buildings must be removed.

Obsolescence. The condition or process of falling into disuse. Structures have become ill-suited for the original use.

Deterioration. With respect to buildings, defects including, but not limited to, major defects in the secondary building components such as doors, windows, porches, gutters and dovmspouts, and fascia. With respect to surface improvements, that the condition of roadways, alleys, curbs,

107336

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking, and surface storage areas evidence deterioration including but not limited to, surface cracking, crumbling, potholes, depressions, loose paving material, and weeds protruding through paved surfaces.

Presence of Structures Below Minimum Code Standards. All structures that do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire, and other governmental codes applicable to property, but not including housing and property maintenance codes.

Illegal Use of Individual Structures. The use of structures in violation of the applicable Federal, State, or local laws, exclusive of those applicable to the presence of structures below minimum code standards.

Excessive Vacancies. The presence of buildings that are unoccupied or underutilized and that represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent, or duration of the vacancies.

Lack of Ventilation, Light or Sanitary Facilities. The absence of adequate ventilation for light or air circulation in spaces or rooms without windows, or that require the removal of dust, odor, gas, smoke, or other noxious airborne materials. Inadequate natural light and ventilation means the absence of skylights or windows for interior spaces or rooms and improper window sizes and amounts by room area to window area ratios. Inadequate sanitary facilities refers to the absence or inadequacy of garbage storage and enclosure, bathroom facilities, hot water and kitchens, and structural inadequacies preventing ingress and egress to and from all rooms and units within a building.

Inadequate Utilities. Underground and overhead utilities such as storm sewers and storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and gas, telephone, and electrical services that are shown to be inadequate. Inadequate utilities are those that are: (i) of insufficient capacity to serve the uses in the redevelopment project area, (ii) deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete, or in disrepair, or (iii) lacking within the redevelopment project area.

Excessive Land Coverage and Overcrowding of Structures and Community Facilities. The over-intensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities onto a site. Examples of problem conditions warranting the designation of an area as one exhibiting excessive land coverage are: (i) the presence of buildings either improperly situated on parcels or located on parcels of inadequate size and shape in relation to present-day standards of development for health and safety and (ii) the presence of multiple buildings on a single parcel. For there to be a finding of excessive land coverage, these parcels must exhibit one or more of the following conditions: insufficient provision for light and air within or around buildings, increased threat of spread of fire due to the close proximity of buildings, lack of adequate or proper access to a public right-of-way, lack of reasonably required off-street parking, or inadequate provision for loading and service.

Deleterious Land Use or Layout. The existence of incompatible land use relationships, buildings occupied by inappropriate mixed uses, or uses considered to be noxious, offensive, or unsuitable for the surrounding area.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107337

Environmental Contamination. The proposed redevelopment project area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or Federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment ofthe redevelopment project area.

Lack of Community Planning, The proposed redevelopment project area was developed prior to or without the benefit pr guidance of a community plan. This means that the development occurred prior to the adoption by the municipality of a comprehensive or other community plan or that the plan was not followed at the time of the area's development. This factor must be documented by evidence of adverse or incompatible land use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels pf inadequate shape and size to meet contemporary development standards, or other evidence demonstrating an absence of effective community planning.

Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value. The total equalized assessed value of the proposed redevelopment project area has declined for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated; is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated.

Factors for Vacant Land

Under the provisions of the "blighted area" section of the Act, for vacant land to consfitute a "blighted area," a combination of two or more of the following six factors must be identified as being present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed and act in combination to impact the sound growth of the tax base for the proposed district.

Obsolete Platting of Vacant Land. Parcels of limited or narrow size or configurations of parcels of irregular size or shape that would be difficult to develop on a planned basis and in a manner compatible with contemporary standards and requirements, or platting that failed to create rights-of-ways for streets or alleys or that created inadequate right-of-way widths for streets, alleys, or other public rights-of-way or that omitted easements for public utilities.

Diversity of Ownership. Diversity of ownership is when adjacent properties are owned by multiple parties. When diversity of ownership of parcels of vacant land is sufficient in number to retard or impede the ability to assemble the land for development, this factor applies.

Tax and Special Assessment Delinquencies. Tax and special assessment delinquencies exist or the property has been the subject of tax sales under the Property Tax Code within the last five years.

107338

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Deterioration of Structures or Site Improvements in Neighboring Areas Adjacent to the Vacant Land. Evidence of structural deterioration and area disinvestment in blocks adjacent to the vacant land may substantiate why new development had not previously occurred on the vacant parcels.

Environmental Contamination. The area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or Federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area.

Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value_t The total equalized assessed value of the proposed redevelopment project area has declined for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated; is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated.

Additionally, under the "blighted area" section of the Act, eligibility may be established for those vacant areas that would have qualified as a blighted area immediately prior to becoming vacant. Under this test for establishing eligibility, building records may be reviewed to determine that a combination of five or more of the 13 "blighted area" eligibility factors for improved property listed above were present immediately prior to demolition of the area's structures.

The vacant "blighted area" section includes six other tests for establishing eligibility but none of these are relevant to the conditions within the West Woodlawn RPA.

Methodology Overview ahd Determination of Eligibility

Analysis of eligibility factors was done through research involving an extensive field survey of all property within the West Woodlawn RPA, and a review of building and property records. Building and property records include building code violation citations, building permit data, assessor information, and information on the age and condition of sewer and water lines within the study area. Our survey of the area established that there are 1,497 primary structures and 2,284 tax parcels within the West Woodlawn RPA.

The West Woodlawn RPA was examined for qualification factors consistent with either the "blighted area" or "conservation area" requirements of the Act. Based upon these criteria, the property within the West Woodlawn RPA qualifies for designation as a "conservation area" as defined by the Act.

To arrive at this designation, S. B. Friedman & Company noted the number of eligibility factors

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107339

present, and analyzed the distribution of the eligibility factors on a building-by-building and/or parcel-by-parcel basis and analyzed the distribution ofthe eligibility factors on a block-by-block basis. When appropriate, we calculated the presence of eligibility factors on infrastructure and ancillary properties associated with the structures. The eligibility factors were correlated to buildings and/or parcels using structure-base maps, property files created from field observations, record searches, and field surveys. This information was then graphically plotted on a parcel map of the West Woodlavm RPA by block to establish the distribution of eligibility factors and to determine which factors were present to a major extent.

Major factors are used to establish eligibility. These factors are present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA. Minor factors are supporting factors present to a meaningful extent on some ofthe parcels or on a scattered basis. Their presence suggests that the area is at risk of experiencing more extensive deterioration and disinvestment.

To reasonably arrive at this designation, S. B. Friedman & Company documented the existence of qualifying eligibility factors and confirmed that a sufficient number of factors were present within the West Woodlawn RPA and reasonably distributed.

Although it may be concluded under the Act that the mere presence ofthe minimum number of the stated factors may be sufficient to make a finding of the RPA as a conservation area, this evaluation was made on the basis that the conservation area factors must be present to an. extent that indicates that public intervention is appropriate or necessary.

Conservation Area Findings

As required by the Act, within a conservation area, at least fifty percent (50%) of the buildings must be 35 years of age or older, and at least three of the 13 eligibility factors must be found present to a major extent within the area.

Establishing that at least 50 percent of the West Woodlawn RPA buildings are 35 years of age or older is a condition precedent to establishing the area as a conservation area under the Act. Based on information provided by the Cook County Assessor's office, we have established that of the 1,497 buildings located within the West Woodlawn RPA, 1,424 (95 percent) are 35 years of age or older.

¹ In addition to establishing that the West Woodlawn RPA meets the age requirement, our research has revealed that the following four factors are present to a major extent:

1. Deterioration

2. Inadequate Utilities -

3. Structures Below Minimum Code

4. Lack of Community Planning , The following factors were found to be present to a minor extent:

1. Deleterious Land Use or Layout

107340

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

2. Excessive Vacancies >

Based on the presence of these factors, the RPA meets the minimum requirements of a "conservation area" under the Act.

Most of the blocks located in the RPA either contain deteriorated buildings or are served by deteriorated infrastructure, including cracked or crumbling sidewalks, deteriorated alleys, and deteriorated roadways. Also nearly all the blocks comprising the RPA are serviced by inadequate utilities, particularly sewer lines that are overdue for repair or replacement. The high cost of upgrading these systems, coupled with the high presence of deteriorated properties in the area, increases the likelihood that buildings within the RPA will fall into disrepair or disuse.

Maps 4A through 4E illustrate the presence and distribution of the major eligibility factors on a block-by-block basis within the RPA. The following sections summarize our field research as it pertains to each ofthe identified eligibility factors found within the West Woodlawn RPA.

MAJOR FACTORS 1. Deterioration

This factor was given to those buildings (and their corresponding parcels) where interior and/or exterior deterioration of buildings could be documented through surveys or interviews. Examples of the building deterioration observed in the field are structural cracks, spalling brick surfaces, wavy roofs, rotting window frames, holes in soffits, cracked and leaning porch steps, and broken windows. The two largest housing developments in the RPA, Parkway Gardens and Grove Pare Plaza Apartments, suffer from interior deferred maintenance and antiquated internal systems. Interviews with property managers unveiled problems with older heating and cooling systems, fire hazards in trash chutes, and inoperable elevators.

Deterioration of public improvements is also evident throughout the West Woodawn RPA. Many of the streets and sidewalks, and nearly all of the alleys in the RPA exhibit some level of deterioration.

Overall, 1,148 of the 2,284 parcels (50 percent) are affected by some level of deterioration. Surface area deterioration (such as alleys, streets, and sidewalks) affects 579 parcels (25 percent) within the RPA while 757 parcels (33 percent) exhibit building deterioration. Deterioration was deemed to be present to a meaningful extent on a given block if 50 percent or more of its parcels exhibited at least one type of deterioration. One or both of these types of deterioration is present to meaningful extent on 35 blocks (55 percent) within the RPA.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107341

2. Inadequate Utilities

A review of the City's water and sewer atlases found that inadequate underground utilities affect 1,916 (or 84 percent) of the 2,284 tax parcels in the West Woodlavm RPA. This is due primarily to the number of antiquated sewer lines in the RPA, many of which were installed prior to 1909. These lines have surpassed their 100-year service lives and are in need of replacement or have been deemed inadequate by the City's water department.¹

The inadequate utilities factor was deemed to be present to a meaningful extent on a given block if 50 percent or more of its parcels exhibited the factor. Due to the age and condition of the sewer and water lines, inadequate utilities was found to be present to a major extent on 56 (or 88 percent) of the 64 blocks within the West Woodlawn RPA.

3. Presence of Structures Below Minimum Code Standards

Relying on data provided by the City's Department of Buildings, 907 structural code violation citations were issued for 130 separate property addresses within the West Woodlawn RPA between January 2002 and July 2009. Analyzed on a block basis, buildings below code affect 32 of the 64 blocks (50 percent) of the blocks within the RPA. Structures below code standards indicate that a building is in a current state of non-compliance and could potentially fall into more severe disrepair. This continuing problem underscores the documented deterioration of buildings.

4. Lack of Community Planning

Lack of community planning is assessed as an area-wide factor. It is not necessarily attributable to any one parcel but is substantiated by evidence of incompatible land use relationships, improper subdivisions, or inadequate land platting. There are several incidences, particularly along major thoroughfares that exhibit the lack of community planning throughout the RPA. The following outlines four significant examples of this factor.

Existing Large Residential Developments. The parcel and building layout of both Grove Pare Plaza and Parkway Gardens are ill-configured for its current use as well as for future uses. Parkway Gardens, in particular, has limited vehicular access, which could be problematic in the event of an emergency. The development contains 694 units with no internal roadway network; only a frontage road surrounds the property. While Grove Pare Plaza does have large parking areas that could accommodate both private and emergency vehicles, its building layout and design does not allow for proper buffering between walkways, play areas, and incoming vehicular traffic. Additionally, per interviews with property managers and owners, the buildings' layouts in both developments create isolated pockets where crime activity can take place.

The City of Chicago Department of Water Management defines the projected service life as 100 years.

107342

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

East 63'" Street. Much of the land in the RPA along 63^rd Street is vacant or underutilized and has been for several years. The chronic vacancy is due, in part, to the shallow depths of parcels relative to its location and zoning. This portion of 63^rd Street is zoned as a commercial/retail corridor and is directly adjacent to overhead Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) elevated train tracks. The presence of these tracks presents both a benefit and a drawback to commercial development along the street: While the overhead transit center attracts commuters and other pedestrian traff.c, visibility from the street and vehicular access is somewhat encumbered by the overhead tracks. In order to establish better visibility, in addition to accommodating its parking needs, most larger-scale, contemporary retail development is set back from the street. The parcel depths along 63^rd Street are not large enough to accommodate these more modem layouts of large-scale retail development.

East 67"' Street. The portion of East 67^th Street that is located within the RPA has widely inconsistent land uses and ill-configured parcel layouts. Portions of East 67^,h Street serve as commercial/retail uses while other portions of the street include multi-family and single-family residential buildings. Additionally, the street in several places has mismatched parcel depths and orientation. There are buildings along the frontage of the street that are oriented towards 67^mStreet while others are oriented towards residential streets. The parcel orientation along 67^lhStreet makes it difficult tp encourage a harmonious development pattern for future development projects.

South Chicago Avenue. The northeast frontage of South Chicago Avenue between East 67^thStreet and East 69'¹' Street features a myriad of land uses that are incompatible with contemporary development standards and could be regarded as deleterious. This two-block stretch of South Chicago Avenue contains light industrial, retail, mixed-use buildings (ground floor commercial with residential in upper floors), and single-family homes. The land uses bear no relationship to one another and appear to be developed without the benefit of any community planning.

As discussed in the History of the Area section, the Woodlavm community area was designated as conservation area in the 1940s but a plan was never implemented to curtail neighborhood decline. The lack of an implementation plan has stalled redevelopment present day and has caused the West Woodlawn RPA to presently qualify as a conservation district.

MINOR FACTORS

1. Deleterious Land Use and Layout ~»

The deleterious land use and layout factor was found to be present in the RPA in instances where conflicting land uses and improper or unsafe interactions of parcels and rights-of-way were observed. Throughout much of the RPA, vacant parcels are present along commercial corridors and interspersed with residential parcels. Many of these parcels are unsecured or insufficiently secured and contain trash, construction materials, and other debris that create a health and safety hazard for nearby residents, especially children. Approximately 10 percent of the RPA's land area consists of unsecured vacant land parcels. The extensive presence of these conditions is incompatible with nearby residential property and serves to break up the fabric of the neighborhood.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107343

2. Excessive Vacancy

Approximately 9 percent (134 buildings) ofthe RPA's buildings were observed to be more than 50 percent vacant. There are several residential blocks that have vacant homes which are boarded up or have City notices on the doors. Coupled with the number of vacant lots within the RPA boundary, vacancy appears to be a chronic problem within the RPA. The presence of these vacant buildings shows disinvestment in the housing stock and also brings down the property values of surrounding occupied homes.

4. Redevelopment Plan & Project Redevelopment Needs of the West Woodlawn RPA

The existing land use pattern and conditions in the West Woodlawn RPA suggest three redevelopment needs for the area:

1. Resources for commercial, residential, and mixed-use development and rehabilitation;

2. Infrastructure improvements, streetscaping, and buffering/screening between land uses; and

3. Property assembly, demolition, and site preparation.

The Redevelopment Plan and Project identifies tools the City will use to guide redevelopment in the West Woodlawn RPA to create, promote, and sustain a vibrant mixed use community. The goals, objectives, and strategies discussed below have been developed to address these needs and to facilitate the sustainable redevelopment of the West Woodlawn RPA. The proposed public improvements outlined in the Redevelopment Plan and Project will help to create an environment conducive to private investment and redevelopment within the West Woodlawn RPA. To support specific projects and encourage future investment in the RPA, public resources, including tax increment financing, may be used to rehabilitate older buildings, improve, or repair RPA public facilities and/or infrastructure, and provide streetscape improvements! In addition, tax increment financing may be used to subsidize developer interest costs related to redevelopment projects.

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies

Goals, objectives, and strategies are designed to address the need for redevelopment within the overall framework of the Redevelopment Plan and Project for the use of anticipated tax increment funds generated within the West Woodlawn RPA.

Goal. The overall goal ofthe Redevelopment Plan is to reduce or eliminate the conditions that qualify the West Woodlawn RPA as a conservation area, and to provide the mechanisms necessary to support public and private development and improvements in the RPA. This goal is to be achieved through an integrated and comprehensive strategy that leverages public resources to stimulate private investment in rehabilitation of existing structures and new development. Eliminating these conditions and facilitating development within the RPA will facilitate reestablishment ofthe RPA as a cohesive and vibrant mixed-use area that provides a broad range of both housing opportunities and commercial/retail uses, while accommodating public and institutional uses where appropriate. Redevelopment ofthe RPA will improve retail, commercial, and housing conditions; improve the relationship between the area's land uses; and attract private redevelopment.

107344

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Objectives. Eleven broad objectives support the overall goal of area-wide revitalization of the West Woodlavm RPA. These include:

3. Improve the quality and quantity of existing open space, plazas, and streetscape elements to provide the community with safe, attractive public gathering spaces;

6. Provide resources for creation and/or improvement of community facilities to provide health/wellness, education, social support, and job training opportunities for RPA residents;

7. Improve vehicular circulation throughout the RPA, through improvements to streets, alleys and loading areas;

8. Improve public transit facilities within the RPA, including encouragement of upgrades to Chicago Transit Authority properties and facilities;

9. Replace or repair public infrastructure where needed, including streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, underground water and sanitary systems, alleys, bridges, and viaducts;

10. Provide opportunities for women-owned, minority-owned, and locally-ovmed businesses to share in job opportunities associated with the redevelopment of the West Woodlavm RPA, particularly in the design and construction industries; and

11. Support job training and welfare to work programs and increase employment opportunities for City and neighborhood residents;

Strategies. These objectives will be implemented through four specific and integrated strategies. These include:

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107345

' the Redevelopment Plan and Project. These public improvements may be completed pursuant to redevelopment agreements with private entities or intergovernmental agreements with other public entities, and may include the construction, rehabilitation, renovation, or restoration of public improvements on one or more parcels.

The City requires that developers who receive TIF assistance for market-rate housing set aside twenty percent (20 percent) of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Community Development or any successor agency. Generally, this means that affordable for-sale' housing units should be priced at a level that is affordable to persons earning no more than one hundred percent (100 percent) of the area median income, and affordable rental units should be affordable to persons earning no more than sixty percent (60 percent) of the area median income. TIF funds can also be used to pay for up to fifty percent (50 percent) of the cost of construction or up to seventy five percent (75 percent) of interest costs for new housing units to be occupied by low-. income and very low-income households as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act.

107346

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Project. To meet the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, the City may acquire and assemble property throughout the RPA. Land assemblage by the City may be by purchase, exchange, donation, lease, eminent domain, through the Tax Reactivation Program, or other programs and may be for the purpose of (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers, or (b) sale, lease, conveyance, or dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Site preparation may include such preparatory work as demolition of existing improvements and environmental remediation, where appropriate. Furthermore, the City may require written redevelopment agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the City may devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and development.

Proposed Future Land Use

The proposed future land use of the West Woodlawn RPA reflects the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and Project, which are to provide resources for the rehabilitation of existing structures, facilitate diverse new residential and retail development, upgrade public infrastructure, enhance pedestrian and vehicular circulation, improve transit facilities, and enhance the quality of community and open space resources within the RPA.

The proposed future land use for the RPA is a mixed-use (residential, retail/commercial, and public/institutional) district, as shown on Map 5. This proposed future land use is consistent with historical land use patterns and current redevelopment trends in and around the RPA, as well as the need to serve the community with modem facilities of the types noted above. The proposed future land use within the RPA includes a range of residential and retail/commercial uses; residential units above retail and commercial uses; and educational, civic, and institutional uses.

The proposed future land uses shown on Map 5 are the predominant uses and are not exclusive of any other uses. The uses shown are for the purposes of guiding the Redevelopment Plan and do not supersede zoning. The proposed land uses described herein will be approved by the Chicago Plan Commission prior to its adoption by the City Council.

Assessment of Housing Impact

As set forth in the Act, if the redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project area would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited'residential units and a municipality is unable to certify that no displacement will occur, the municipality must prepare a Housing Impact Study and incorporate the study in the redevelopment project plan.

The RPA contains an estimated 5,054 inhabited residential units. Since the redevelopment project area contains more than 75 units, a Housing Impact Study is required by the Act and was prepared by S. B. Friedman & Company. The results of the Housing Impact Study are described in a separate report which presents certain factual information required by the Act. The report is entitled "West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Housing Impact Study," and is attached as Appendix 3 to this Plan.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107347

5. Financial Plan

Eligible Costs

The various redevelopment expenditures that are eligible for payment or reimbursement under the Act are reviewed below. Following this review is a list of estimated redevelopment project costs that are deemed to be necessary to implement this Redevelopment Plan and Project (the "Redevelopment Project Costs").

Redevelopment Project Costs include the sum total of all reasonable or necessary costs incurred, estimated to be incurred, or incidental to this Plan pursuant to the Act. Such costs may include, without limitation, the following:

1. Costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and administration of the Redevelopment Plan and Project including but not limited to, staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other services (excluding lobbying expenses), provided that no charges for professional services are based on a percentage of the tax increment collected;

2. The costs of marketing sites within the RPA to prospective businesses, developers, and investors;

3. Property assembly costs, including but not limited to, acquisition of land and other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of buildings, site preparation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground-level or below-ground environmental contamination, including, but not limited to parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, and the clearing and grading of land;

4. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings, fixtures, and leasehold improvements, and the costs of replacing an existing public building if pursuant to the implementation of a redevelopment project the existing public building is to be demolished to use the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private investment;

5. Costs of the construction of public works or improvements subject to the limitations in Section 11 -74.4-3(q)(4) of the Act;

6. Costs of job training and retraining projects including the costs of "welfare to work" programs implemented by businesses located within the RPA and such proposals feature a community-based training program which ensures maximum reasonable opportunities for residents of the Loop Community Area with particular attention to the needs of those residents who have previously experienced inadequate employment opportunities and development of job-related skills including residents of public and other subsidized housing and people with disabilities;

107348

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

7. Financing costs, including but not limited to, all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued hereunder including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and for a period not exceeding 36 months following completion and including reasonable reserves related thereto;

8. To the extent the City, by written agreement, accepts and approves the same, all or a portion of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from the redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and Project;

9. Relocation costs to the extent that the City determines that relocation costs shall be paid or is required to make payment of relocation costs by federal or state law, or by Section 74.4-3(n)(7) ofthe Act;

10. Payment in lieu of taxes, as defined in the Act;

11. Costs of job training, retraining, advanced vocational education or career education, including but not limited to, courses in occupational, semi-technical, or technical fields leading directly to employment incurred by one or more taxing districts, provided that such costs; (i) are related to the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vocational education, or career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in the RPA; and (ii) when incurred by a taxing district or taxing districts other than the City, are set forth in a written agreement by or among the City and the taxing district or taxing districts, which agreement describes the program to be undertaken including but not limited to, the number of employees to be trained, a description of the training and services to be provided, the number and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program, sources of funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the payment by community college districts of costs pursuant to Sections 3-37, 3-38, 3-40, and 3-40.1 of the Public Community College Act, 110 ILCS 805/3-37, 805/3-38, 805/3-40 and 805/3-40.1, and by school districts of costs pursuant to Sections 10-22.20a and 10-23.3a ofthe School Code, 105 ILCS 5/10-22.20a and 5/10-23.3a;

12. Interest costs incurred by a redeveloper related to the construction, renovation, or rehabilitation of a redevelopment project provided that:

a. Such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation fund established pursuant to the Act;

b. Such payments in any one year may not exceed thirty percent (30%) ofthe aimual interest costs incurred by the redeveloper with regard to the development project during that year;

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107349

c. If there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax allocation fund to make the payment pursuant to this provision, then the amounts so due shall accrue and be payable when sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund;

d. The total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total of (i) cost paid or incurred by the redeveloper for the redevelopment project; (ii) redevelopment project costs excluding any property assembly costs and any relocation costs incurred by the City pursuant to the Act;

e. For the financing of rehabilitated or new housing for low-income households and very low-income households, as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act, the percentage of seventy-five percent (75%) shall be substituted for thirty percent (30%) in subparagraphs 12b and 12d above;

13. Unless explicitly provided in the Act, the cost of construction of new, privately owned buildings shall not be an eligible redevelopment project cost;

14. An elementary, secondary, or unit school district's increased costs attributable to assisted housing units will be reimbursed as provided in the Act;

15. Instead of the eligible costs provided for in 12b, 12d, and 12e above, the City may pay up to 50 percent of the cost of construction, renovation, and/or rehabilitation of all low- and very low-income housing units (for ownership or rental) as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. If the units are part of a residential redevelopment project that includes units not affordable to low- and very low-income households, only the low- and very low-income units shall be eligible for benefits under the Act; and

16. The costs of daycare services for children of employees from low-income families working for businesses located within the RPA and all or a portion of the cost of operation of day care centers established by RPA businesses to serve employees from low-income families working in businesses located in the RPA. For the purposes of this paragraph, "low-income families" means families whose annual income does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the City, county, or regional median income as determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.

If a special service area has been established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act, 35 ILCS 235/0.01 et seg., then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act may be used within the RPA for the purposes permitted by the Special Service Area Tax Act, as well as the purposes permitted by the Act.

Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs

The estimated eligible costs that are deemed to be necessary to implement this Redevelopment Plan and Project are shown in Table 2. The total eligible cost provides an upper limit on expenditures that are to be funded using tax increment revenues, exclusive of capitalized interest,

107350

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

issuance costs, interest, and other financing costs. Within this limit, adjustments may be made in line items without amendment to this Plan, to the extent permitted by the Act. Additional funding in the form of State, Federal, County, or local grants, private developer contributions, and other outside sources may be pursued by the City as a means of financing improvements and facilities that are of benefit to the general community.

Table 2: Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs

Eligible Expenses	Estimated Project Costs
Professional Services (including analysis, administration, studies, surveys, legal, marketing, etc.)	$800,000
Property Assembly (including acquisition, site preparation, demolition, and environmental remediation)	$8,000,000
Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Fixtures, and Leasehold Improvements	$15,000,000
Eligible Construction Costs (includes Affordable Housing Construction Costs)	$28,000,000
Relocation Costs	$2,000,000
Public Works or Improvements (including streets and utilities, parks and open space, public facilities (schools & other public facilities)) (1)	$11,500,000
Job Training, Retraining, Welfare-to-Work	$500,000
Interest Costs	$3,000,000
Day Care Services	$500,000
TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT COSTS (2), (3), (4)	$69,300,000

(1) This category may also include paying Tor or reimbursing (i) an elemenlaiy, secondary, or unit school district's increased costs attributed to assisted housing units, and (ii) capital costs or taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the RPA. As permitted by the-Act, to the extent the City by written agreement accepts and approves the same, the City may pay, or reimburse all, or a portion of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from a redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance ofthe objectives ofthe Plan.

(2) Total Redevelopment Project Costs exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense, capitalized interest, costs of issuance, and costs associated with optional redemptions. These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total Redevelopment Project Costs.

(3) The amount of the Total Redevelopment Project Costs that can be incurred in the RPA will be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous RPAs, or those separated from the RPA only by a public right-of-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in the RPA, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs' incurred in the RPA which are paid from incremental properly taxes generated in contiguous RPAs or those separated from the RPA only by a public right-of-way.

(4) Ail costs are in 2009 dollars and may be increased by five percent (5%) after adjusting for annual inflation reflected in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for All Items Tor the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, 1L-1N-WI CMSA, published by the U. S. Department of Labor. In addition to the above stated costs, each issue of obligations issued to f.nance a phase ofthe Redevelopment Plan and Project may include an amount of proceeds sufficient to pay customary and reasonable charges associated with the issuance of such obligations, including interest costs.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107351

Adjustments to the estimated line item costs in Table 2 are anticipated and may be made by the City without amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and Project to the extent permitted by the Act. Each individual project cost will be reevaluated in light of projected private development and resulting incremental tax revenues as it is considered for public financing under the provisions of the Act. The totals of line items set forth above are not intended to place a limit on the described expenditures. Adjustments may be made in line items within the total, either increasing or decreasing line item costs as a result of changed redevelopment costs and needs.

In the event the Act is amended after the date of the approval of this Redevelopment Plan and Project by the City Council of Chicago to (a) include new eligible redevelopment project costs, or (b) expand the scope or increase the amount of existing eligible redevelopment project costs (such as, for example, by increasing the amount of incurred interest costs that may be paid under 65 ILCS 5/ll-74.4-3(q)(ll)), this Redevelopment Plan and Project shall be deemed to incorporate such additional, expanded, or increased eligible costs as eligible costs under the Redevelopment Plan and Project, to the extent permitted by the Act. In the event of such amendment(s), the City may add any new eligible redevelopment project costs as a line item in Table 3, or otherwise adjust the line items in Table 2 without amendment to this Redevelopment Plan and Project, to the extent permitted by the Act. In no instance, however, shall such additions or adjustments result in an increase of more than five percent after adjustment for inflation in the total redevelopment project costs without a further amendment to this Redevelopment Plan and Project.

Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment

Each private project within the West Woodlawn RPA shall be governed by the terms of a written redevelopment agreement entered into by a designated developer and the City and approved by the City Council. Where tax increment funds are used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs, to the extent funds are available for such purposes, expenditures by the City shall be coordinated to coincide on a reasonable basis with the actual redevelopment expenditures of the developer(s).

The Redevelopment Plan and Project shall be completed, and all obligations issued to finance redevelopment costs shall be retired, no later than December 31^s1 of the year in which the payment to the City treasurer as provided in the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third year calendar year following the year in which the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Plan and Project is adopted (by December 31, 2034, if the ordinances establishing the RPA are adopted during 2010).

Sources of Funds to Pay Costs

Funds necessary to pay for Redevelopment Project Costs and secure municipal obligations issued for such costs are to be derived primarily from Incremental Property Taxes. Other sources of funds that may be used to pay for Redevelopment Project Costs or to secure municipal obligations include land disposition proceeds, state and federal grants, investment income, private financing, and other legally permissible funds the City may deem appropriate. The City may incur redevelopment project costs that are paid for from funds of the City other than

107352

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

incremental taxes, and the City may then be reimbursed for such costs from incremental taxes. Also, the City may permit the utilization of guarantees, deposits, and other forms of security made available by private sector developers. Additionally, the City may utilize revenues, other than State sales tax increment revenues, received under the Act from one redevelopment project area for eligible costs in another redevelopment project area that is either contiguous to, or is separated only by a public right-of-way from, the redevelopment project area from which the revenues are received.

The West Woodlawn RPA is contiguous to the Woodlawn RPA. It may, in the future, be contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, other redevelopment areas created under the Act. The City may utilize net incremental property taxes received from the West Woodlawn RPA to pay eligible redevelopment project costs, or obligations issued to pay such costs, in contiguous redevelopment project areas or project areas separated only by a public right-of-way, and vice versa. The amount of revenue from the RPA, made available to support such contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs within the RPA, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in this Plan.

The West Woodlawn RPA may become contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, redevelopment project areas created under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law (65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-1, et sea,.). If the City finds that the goals, objectives, and financial success of such contiguous redevelopment project areas or those separated only by a public right-of-way are interdependent with those ofthe RPA, the City may determine that it is in the best interests ofthe City and the furtherance of the purposes of the Plan that net revenues from the RPA be made available to support any such redevelopment project areas, and vice versa. The City therefore proposes to utilize net incremental revenues received from the RPA to pay eligible redevelopment project costs (which are eligible .under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law referred to above) in any such areas and vice versa. Such revenues may be transferred or loaned between the RPA and such areas. The amount of revenue from the RPA so made available, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs within the RPA or other areas as described in the preceding paragraph, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in Table 2 of this Plan.

If necessary, the redevelopment plans for other contiguous redevelopment project areas that may be or already have been created under the Act may be drafted or amended as applicable to add appropriate and parallel language to allow for sharing of revenues between such districts.

Issuance of Obligations

To finance project costs, the City may issue bonds or obligations secured by Incremental Property Taxes generated within the West Woodlawn RPA pursuant to Section 11-74.4-7 ofthe Act. To enhance the .security of a municipal obligation, the City may pledge its full faith and credit through the issuance of general obligations bonds. In addition, the City may provide other legally permissible credit enhancements to any obligations issued pursuant to the Act.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107353

All obligations issued by the City pursuant to this Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and the Act shall be retired within the timeframe described under "Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment" above. Also, the final maturity date of any such obligations that are issued may not be later than 20 years from their respective dates of issue. One or more of a series of obligations may be sold at one or more times in order to implement this Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan. Obligations may be issued on a parity or subordinated basis.

In addition to paying Redevelopment Project Costs, Incremental Property Taxes may be used for the scheduled retirement of obligations, mandatory or optional redemptions, establishment of debt service reserves, and bond sinking funds. To the extent that Incremental Property Taxes are not needed for these purposes, and are not otherwise required, pledged, earmarked, or otherwise designated for the payment of Redevelopment Project Costs, any excess Incremental Property Taxes shall then become available for distribution annually to taxing districts having jurisdiction over the RPA in the manner provided by the Act.

Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation of Properties in the Redevelopment Project Area

The purpose of identifying the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("EAV") of the West Woodlawn RPA is to provide an estimate of the initial EAV that the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental EAV and incremental property taxes ofthe West Woodlawn RPA. The estimated 2008 EAV ofthe 2,284 parcels in the RPA is approximately $142,623,312. The 2008 EAV is based on the Assessor Certified Assessment multiplied by the 2008 Cook County Equalization Factor. This total EAV amount, by PIN, is summarized in Appendix 2. The EAV is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk, and shall become the Certified Initial EAV from which all incremental property taxes in the RPA will be calculated by Cook County. The Plan has utilized the Assessor Certified EAVs for the 2008 tax year; the figure is not Board Certified. If the Board Certified 2008 EAV shall become available prior to the date of the adoption of the Plan by the City Council, the City may update the Plan by replacing the Assessor Certified EAV with the Board Certified EAV.

Anticipated Equalized Assessed Valuation

By 2033, the EAV for the West Woodlawn RPA will be approximately $263,628,381. This estimate is based on several key assumptions, including: 1) an inflation factor of two-and-one-half percent (2.5 percent) per year on the EAV of all properties within the West Woodlawn RPA, with its cumulative impact occurring in each triennial reassessment year; 2) an equalization factor of 2.9058 (2008 equalizafion factor) throughout the life of the RPA; and 3) estimated increment generated from the redevelopment of one ofthe RPA's large housing complexes.

6. Required Findings and Tests

Lack of Growth and Private Investment

The City is required under the Act to evaluate whether or not the RPA has been subject to growth and private investment and must substantiate a finding of lack of such investment prior to establishing a tax increment financing district. To investigate a lack of growth and private

107354

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO' 11/17/2010

investment within the West Woodlawn RPA, S. B. Friedman & Company obtained and analyzed data for all building petvnits issued within the RPA between 2004 and 2009. This data was provided by the Department of Buildings. In addition, tax assessment data provided by the Cook County Assessor was analyzed for both the RPA and the City of Chicago.

A review of building permit data indicates that 1,283 building permits were issued within the West Woodlawn RPA between January 2004 and July 2009. Of this number, 11 permits (0.8%) were issued for new construction and 49 permits (3.8%) were issued for substantial rehabilitation of existing buildings in the RPA. The remaining permits were issued for minor additions (e.g. porches), repairs, or to address a previous code violation. Over the Five years studied, new construction permits were issued for 11 primary structures, comprised of eight residential buildings (24 units), three retail structures, and one office building.

The value of new construction and rehabilitation permits issued in the RPA during this time period totaled approximately $54 million. However, $45 million of the total value was assigned to one office building that is owned by the University of Chicago. The remaining permit value, $9 million, covers 10 development projects that primarily consist of smaller residential (three units or less) and retail properties. The $9 million in permit value accounts for less than three percent ofthe total assessor's market value for the RPA per year. This rate of investment is very low when compared to the overall value of private property within the RPA, which is currently estimated to exceed $306 million, based on assessments made by the Cook County Assessor.

The most recent Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) of the RPA reflects the downward trend in housing values that has affected most of the general market. At its peak between 2005 and 2006, the EAV for the RPA increased nearly 50 percent. Market values during this time period, particularly for housing, skyrocketed and were overinfiated. This conclusion is further evidenced by the subsequent decrease in value two years later. The change in EAV between 2007 and 2008 was negative and it is anticipated that values will decline further in 2009. The table below displays the percentage change in EAV between 2003 and 2008.

Table 3: Year to Year Percentage Change in EAV (2003-2008)

	2003-2004	2004-2005	2005-2006	2006-2007	2007-2008
West Woodlawn RPA	-0.50%	9.20%	47.10%	5.20%	-0.90%

Given the decline in EAV, limited new construction activity, and widespread vacancy present within the RPA (as discussed in the Eligibility Study section), it is likely that public intervention is necessary to correct and restore private development activity. Additionally, the extensive infrastructure needs of the West Woodlawn RPA, as well as. the high cost of rehabilitating structures that have become obsolescent, significantly deteriorated, or have fallen below current standards for new development, it is unlikely that the West Woodlawn RPA will see substantial private investment without public intervention such as that envisioned in this Redevelopment Plan and Project.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107355

Finding: The Redevelopment Project Area (West Woodlawn RPA) on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through significant investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be> anticipated to be developed without the adoption ofthe Redevelopment Plan and Project.

Conformance to the Plans of the City

The West Woodlawn Redevelopment Plan and Project must conform to the comprehensive plan for the City, conform to the strategic economic development plans, or include land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission.

The proposed land uses described in this Redevelopment Plan and Project will be approved by the Chicago Plan Commission prior to its adoption by the City Council.

Dates of Completion

The dates of completion of the project and retirement of obligations are described under "Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment" in Section 5 above.

Financial Impact of the Redevelopment Project

As explained above, without the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and Project and tax increment financing, the West Woodlawn RPA is not expected to see substantial investment from private enterprise. As a result, there is a genuine threat that property values in the area will stagnate or decline. This would lead to a reduction of real estate tax revenue to all taxing districts.

This document describes the comprehensive redevelopment program proposed to be undertaken by the City to create an environment in which private investment can reasonably occur. If a redevelopment project is successful, various new projects may be undertaken that will assist in alleviating blighting conditions, creating new jobs, and promoting both public and private development in the West Woodlawn RPA.

This Redevelopment Plan and Project is expected to have short- and long-term financial impacts on the affected taxing districts. During the period when tax increment financing is utilized, real estate tax increment revenues from the increases in EAV over and above the certified initial EAV (established at the time of adoption of this document by the City) may be used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs for the West Woodlawn RPA. At the time when the West Woodlawn RPA is no longer in place under the Act, the real estate tax revenues resulting from the redevelopment ofthe West Woodlawn RPA will be distributed to all taxing districts levying taxes against property located in the West Woodlawn RPA. These revenues will then be available for use by the affected taxing districts.

107356

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Demand on Taxing District Services and Program to Address Financial and Service Impact

In 1994, the Act was amended to require an assessment of any financial impact of a redevelopment project area on, or any increased demand for service from, any taxing district affected by the redevelopment plan, and a description of any program to address such financial impacts or increased demand.

The City intends to monitor development in the West Woodlawn RPA and,, with the cooperation of the other affected taxing districts, will attempt to ensure that any increased needs are addressed in connection with any particular development. The following major taxing districts presently levy taxes on properties located within the West Woodlawn RPA and maintain the listed facilities within the boundaries of the RPA, or within close proximity to the RPA boundaries:

1. City of Chicago

o E47 Fire Station, 432 E. Marquette Road

o 3^rd District Police Station, 7040 S. Cottage Grove Avenue.

2. Chicago Board of Education

a Sexton Elementary School, 6020 S. Langley Avenue

o Fiske Elementary School, 6145 S. Ingleside Avenue

o Till Elementary Math & Science Academy, 6543 S. Champlain Avenue

» Dulles Elementary, 6311 S. Calumet Avenue

3. Chicago School Finance Authority

4. Chicago Park District

o Washington Park, 5531 S. King Drive o Park No. 524, 6200 S. Drexel Avenue o Midway Plaisance, 5950 S. Woodlawn Avenue

5. Chicago Park District Aquarium and Museum Bonds

6. City of Chicago Library Fund

» Bessie Coleman Library, 731 E. 63^rd Street

7. Chicago Community College District 508

8. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago

9. County of Cook

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107357

10. Cook County Forest Preserve District

Map 6 illustrates the locations of community facilities operated by the above listed taxing districts within or in close proximity to the West Woodlawn RPA. Redevelopment activity may cause increased demand for services from one or more of the above listed taxing districts. The anticipated nature of the increased demand for services on these taxing districts, and the proposed activities to address increased demand, are described below.

City of Chicago. The City is responsible for a wide range of municipal services including: police and fire protection; capital improvements and maintenance; water supply and distribution; sanitation service; and building, housing, arid zoning codes. Replacement of vacant and underutilized sites with active and more intensive uses may result in additional demands on services and facilities provided by the districts.

Additional costs to the City for police, fire, and recycling and sanitation services arising front residential development may occur. However, it is expected that any increase in demand for the City services and programs associated with the West Woodlawn RPA can be handled adequately by City police, fire protection, sanitary collection and recycling services, and programs currently maintained and operated by the City. The redevelopment of the West Woodlawn RPA will not require expansion of services in this area.

City of Chicago Library Fund. The Library Fund, supported primarily by property taxes, provides for the operation and maintenance of City of Chicago public libraries. Additional costs to the City for library services arising from residential development may occur. However, it is expected that any increase in demand for City library services and programs associated with the West Woodlawn RPA can be handled adequately by existing City library services. The redevelopment of the West Woodlawn RPA will not require expansion of services in this area.

Chicago Board of Education and Associated Agencies. General responsibilities of the Board of Education include the provision, maintenance and operation of educational facilities and the provision of education services for kindergarten through twelfth grade.

It is possible that some families who purchase housing or rent new apartments in the West Woodlawn RPA will send their children to public schools, putting increased demand on area school districts. However, it is unlikely that the scope of new residential construction would exhaust the existing capacity of public schools that serve residents of the RPA.

Existing capacity was verified through data provided from the Department of School Demographics and Planning at the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). According to information from CPS, design capacity for a school is determined by counting the total number of classrooms and multiplying that number by 30. In elementary and middle schools, program capacity is calculated as 80% of the design capacity, allowing schools to use a percentage of classroom space for non-traditional learning spaces (e.g., art rooms, music rooms, computer rooms). In a high school, scheduling and more student/teacher mobility allow program capacity to be 100% of the design capacity.

107358

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Data obtained from CPS reveal that the elementary (PK-8) and high schools that include the West Woodlawn RPA in their respective catchment areas currently operate at the following capacities:

School Name	Address	School Type	Inside/ Outside RPA	Enrollment	Enrollment Design Capacity	Enrollment as % of Design Capacity
Sexton Elementary School	6020 S. Langley Avenue	K-8	Inside	423	1,170	36.2%
Fiske Elementary School	6145 S. Ingleside Avenue	K-8-	Outside	325	705	46.1%
Till Elementary Math & Science Academy	6543 S. Champlain Avenue	K-8	Inside	639	1,755	36.4%
Dulles Elementary School	6311 S. Calumet Avenue	K-8	Outside	429	1,140	37.6%
Hyde Park Area High School	6220 S. Stony Island	9-12	Outside	1,962	1,962	87%

All schools currently serving residents within the RPA have enrollments that are below their design capacity. Any increase in households with school aged children would likely not significantly impact the overall enrollment of these facilities. Additionally, increased costs to the local schools resulting from children residing in TIF-assisted housing units will trigger those provisions within the Act that provide for reimbursement to the affected school district(s) where eligible. The City intends to monitor development in the West Woodlawn RPA and, with the cooperation of the Board of Education, will attempt to ensure that any increased demands on the services and capital improvements provided by the Board of Education are addressed in connection with each new residential project.

Chicago Park District. The Chicago Park District is responsible for the provision, maintenance, and operation of park and recreational facilities throughout the City, and for the provision of recreation programs.

Community College District 508. This district is a unit ofthe State of Illinois' system of public community colleges, whose objective is to meet the educational needs of residents of the City and other students seeking higher education programs and services.

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District. This district provides the main trunk lines for the collection of wastewater from Cities, Villages, and Towns, and for the treatment and disposal thereof

It is expected that any increase in demand for treatment of sanitary and storm sewage associated with the West Woodlavm RPA can be handled adequately by existing treatment facilities maintained and operated by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107359

Therefore, no special program is proposed for the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago.

County of Cook. The County has principal responsibility for the protection of persons and property, the provision of public health services, and the maintenance of County highways.

It is expected that any increase in demand for Cook County services can be handled adequately by existing services and programs maintained and operated by the County. Therefore, at this time, no special programs are proposed for this taxing district. Should demand increase, the City will work with the taxing district to determine what, if any, program is necessary to provide adequate services. _f

Cook County Forest Preserve District. The Forest Preserve District is responsible for acquisition, restoration, and management of lands for the purpose of protecting and preserving open space in the City and County for the education, pleasure, and recreation ofthe public. It is expected that any increase in demand for Forest Preserve services can be handled adequately by existing facilities and programs maintained and operated by the District. No special programs are proposed for the Forest Preserve.

Given the nature of the Redevelopment Plan and Project, specific fiscal impacts on the taxing districts and increases in demand for services provided by those districts cannot be wholly predicted within the scope of this plan.

7. Provisions for Amending Redevelopment Plan and Project

This Redevelopment Plan and Project and Project document may be amended pursuant to the provisions ofthe Act.

8. Commitment to Fair Employment Practices and Affirmative Action Plan

The City is committed to and will require developers to follow and affirmatively implement the following principles with respect to this Redevelopment Plan and Project. However, the City shall have the right in its sole discretion to exempt certain small businesses, residential property owners, and developers from the above.

107360

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

A. The assurance of equal opportunity in all personnel and employment actions with respect to this Redevelopment Plan and Project, including, but not limited to, hiring, training, transfer, promotion, discipline, fringe benefits, salary, employment working conditions, terminations, etc. without regard to race, color, sex, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, military dischatge status, source of income, or housing status.

B. Meeting the City's standards for participation of twenty four percent (24%) Minority Business Enterprises and four percent (4%) Women Business Enterprises and the City Resident Construction Worker Employment Requirement as required in redevelopment agreements.

C. The commitment to affirmative action and non-discrimination will ensure that all members of the protected groups are sought out to compete for all job openings and promotional opportunities.

D. Redevelopers will meet City standards for any applicable prevailing wage rate as ascertained by the Illinois Department of Labor to all project employees.

[Maps 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 5 and 6 and Appendix 2 referred to in this West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project printed on pages 107372 through 107406 of this Journal.]

[Appendix 1 referred to in this West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project constitutes Exhibit "C" to ordinance and printed on pages 107432 through 107434 of this Journa/.]

Appendix 3 referred to in this West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project reads as follows:

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107361

Appendix 3.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Housing /mpacf Study.

Assessment of Housing Impact

The purpose of this section is to conduct a Housing Impact Study for the West Woodlavm RPA as set forth in the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (the "Act") 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq., as amended. The Act requires that if the redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project area would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited residential units and the City is unable to certify that no displacement of residents will occur, the municipality shall prepare a Housing Impact Study and incorporate the study into the separate Feasibility Report required by subsection 1 l-74.4-5(a) of the Act, which for the purposes hereof shall also be the "West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project and Plan," or the "Redevelopment Plan."

The primary goal of the Redevelopment Project and Plan is to provide the necessary mechanisms to re-establish the West Woodlawn RPA as a cohesive and vibrant mixed-use area that provides a comprehensive range of commercial and retail uses, as well as a diverse mix of housing types to current and future residents, while accommodating institutional uses where appropriate. Currently, there are no proposed Redevelopment Projects that will result in the displacement of any inhabited residential units. However, since the RPA contains more than 75 inhabited residential units and future redevelopment activity could conceivably result in the removal of inhabited residential units over the 23-year life of the RPA, a housing impact study is required. Under the provisions of the Act:

Part I of the housing impact study shall include:

(i) Data as to whether the residential units are single family or multi-family units;

(ii) The number and type of rooms within the units, if that information is available;

(iii) Whether the units are inhabited or uninhabited, as determined not less than 45 days before the date that the ordinance or resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 11-74.4-5 of the Act is passed; and

(iv) Data as to the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units, which data requirement shall be deemed to be fully satisfied if based on data from the most recent federal Census.

Part II of the housing impact study identifies the inhabited residential units in the proposed redevelopment project area that are to be, or may be, removed. If inhabited residential units are to be removed, then the housing impact study shall identify:

(i) The number and location of those units that will be, or may be, removed;

107362 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

(ii) The municipality's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the proposed redevelopment project area whose residences are to be removed;

(iii) The availability of replacement housing for those residents whose residences are to be removed, and identification of the type, location, and cost of the replacement

^ housing; and

(iv) The type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided. PARTI

(i) Number and Type of Residential Units

The number and type of residential buildings in the area were identified during the building condition and land use survey conducted as part of the eligibility analysis for the area. This survey, completed in July 2009, revealed that the West Woodlawn RPA contains 1,392 residential buildings containing 5,556 total dwelling units. The number of residential units by building type is described as follows:

Building Type	Total Buildings	Total Units
Single-Family	312	315
Multi-Family	1,080	5,241
Total	1,392	5,556

Source: S. B. Friedman & Company

Note: On-campus residences for the University of Chicago were excluded from these total housing unit and type counts.

(ii) Number and Type of Rooms within Units

The distribution within the West Woodlawn RPA of the 5,556 residential units by number of rooms and by number of bedrooms is identified in tables within this section. The methodology to determine this information is described below.

Methodology

In order to describe the distribution of residential units by number and type of rooms within the West Woodlawn RPA, S. B. Friedman & Company analyzed 2000 Census data by Block Groups for those Block Groups encompassed by the Redevelopment Project Area. A Block Group is a combination of Census blocks, and is the lowest level of geography for which the Census Bureau tabulates sample, or long-form, data. In this study, we have relied on 2000 US Census sample data because it is the best available information regarding the structures and residents of the Redevelopment Project Area. These Block Group data show the distribution of housing units by the number of bedrooms and the total number of rooms within each unit. We then applied the 2000 distribution percentage to the total number of units identified by the survey. The estimated distribution of units by bedroom type and number of rooms are described as follows:

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107363

Units by Bedroom Type'
Number of Bedrooms	2000 Census	Current Estimate for RPA
Studio	8%	445
1 Bedroom	19%	1,079
2 Bedrooms	36%	1,980
3 Bedrooms	30%	1,667
4 Bedrooms	5%	268
5+ Bedrooms	2%	117
Total	100%	5,556

Source: 2000 U.S. Census

Units by Number of Rooms²
Number of Rooms	2000 Census	Current Estimate for RPA
1 Room	4%	209
2 Rooms	5%	301
3 Rooms	15%	829
4 Rooms	19%	1,046
5 Rooms	30%	1,656
6 Rooms	15%	858
7 Rooms	6%	355
8 Rooms	1%	50
9+ Rooms	5%	252
Total	100%	5,556

Source: 2000 U.S. Census

As defined by the Census Bureau, Number of Bedrooms includes all rooms intended for use as bedrooms even if they are currently used for some other purpose. A Housing Unit consisting of only one room, such as a one-room efficiency apartment, is classified, by definition, as having no bedroom.

² As defined by the Census Bureau, for each unit, rooms include living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, enclosed porches suitable for year-round use, and lodger's rooms. Excluded are strip or Pullman kitchens, bathrooms, open porches, balconies, halls or foyers, half-rooms, utility rooms, unfinished attics or basements, or other unfinished space used for storage. A partially divided room is a separate room only if there is a partition from floor to ceiling, but not if the partition consists solely of shelves or cabinets.'

107364

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

(iii) Number of Inhabited Units

According to data compiled from the survey completed by S. B. Friedman & Company in July 2009, the West Woodlavm RPA contains an estimated 5,556 residential units of which 502 units (or 9%) are estimated to be vacant. Therefore, there are approximately 5,054 total inhabited units within the redevelopment area. As required by the Act, this information was ascertained as of July 2009, which is a date not less than 45 days prior to the date that the resolution or ordinance required by Subsection 11-74.4-5 (a) of the Act was, or will be, passed (the resolution or ordinance setting the public hearing and Joint Review Board meeting dates).

(iv) Race and Ethnicity of Residents

(

As required by the Act, the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units was determined. According to U.S. Census data, the average household size within the Block Groups which comprise the West Woodlawn RPA was 2.65 persons in 2009. Therefore, there are an estimated 13,393 residents living within the proposed boundaries. The race and ethnic composition of these residents is as follows:

Race	Estimated Residents (2009)	Percentage
Black or African-American Alone	13,017	97.2%
White Alone	157	1.2%
Asian Alone	67	0.5%
American Indian or Alaska Native Alone	18	0.1%
Some other race Alone	37	0.3%
Two other races	97	0.7%
Total	13,393	100%

Source: 2000 U.S. Census

Hispanic Origin	Estimated Residents (2009)	Percentage
Hispanic	115	0.9% .
Non-Hispanic	13,278	99.1%
Total	13,393	100%

Source: 2000 U.S. Census

We have also estimated the potential distribution by income of the households living in the inhabited units within the West Woodlavm RPA.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107365

In order to estimate the number of moderate-, low-, very low-, and very, very low-income households in the RPA, S. B. Friedman & Company used data from Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), a national demographic and income data provider. As determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the definitions of the above-mentioned income categories, adjusted for family size, are as follows:

(i) A very, very low-income household has an adjusted income of less than 30% of the area median income.

(ii) A very low-income household earns between 30% and 50% of the area median income.

(iii) A low-income household earns between 50% and 80% of the area median.

(iv) A moderate-income household earns between 80% and 120% of the area median.

ESRI estimates that of all households residing within the Block Groups encompassed by the West Woodlawn RPA, 61% may be classified as very low-income or lower, 20% may be classified as low-income, and 12% may be classified as moderate-income households.

Households By Income Category
Income Category	2009 Percentage (from ESRI)	Number of Households	Annual Income Range (Average HH of 3 Persons)
Very, Very Low Income	48%	2,438	$0 -$20,370
Very Low-Income	13%	673	20,371 - $33,950
Low-Income	20%	988	$33,951 -$54,250
Moderate-Income	12%	628	$54,251 -$85,480
Subtotal: Moderate-Income or Below	94%	4,727	SO - $85,480
Above Moderate-Income	6%	327	$81,481 +
Total	100%	5,054	--

Source: HUD, ESRI, and S. B. Friedman & Co.

PART II

(i) Number and Location of Units to be Removed

There are currently plans to replace one of the larger housing developments in the RPA with new affordable housing. Grove Pare Plaza will be redeveloped to include 419 units of affordable, moderate, and market-rate housing. The Preservation of Affordable Housing (POAH), the developer for the project, contends that no permanent displacement will occur. As of July 2009,

107366

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

359 of Grove Pare Plaza's 504 units were occupied. Tenants residing in Grove Pare at the start of construction will be relocated to temporary units until the construction of their unit is complete. Beyond the Grove Pare redevelopment project, there are no other proposed Redevelopment Projects that will result in the displacement of any inhabited residential units. Therefore, it is impossible to determine the exact extent to which future projects receiving tax increment assistance (or other public projects implemented in furtherance of the Redevelopment Plan) will bring about the permanent removal of residences. However, it is probable that some existing units may be removed as a result of redevelopment activity over the 23-year life of the RPA. In order to meet the statutory requirement of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed, a methodology was established that would provide a rough, yet reasonable, estimate. This methodology is described below.

Methodology

The methodology used to fulfill the statutory requirements of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed involves three steps:

(i) Step one counts all inhabited residential units identified on any acquisition lists or maps. No pre-existing acquisition lists or maps were identified, nor has an acquisition list been included in the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project and Plan. We therefore assume that no inhabited residential units are likely to be removed due to demolition or rehabilitation of dilapidated buildings.

(ii) Step two counts the number of inhabited residential units located on parcels that are dilapidated as defined by the Act. A survey of the entire RPA completed in July 2009 identified no dilapidated buildings. We therefore assume that no inhabited residential units are likely to be removed due to demolition or rehabilitation of dilapidated buildings.

(iii) Step three counts the number of inhabited residential units that exist where the future land use indicated by the Redevelopment Plan will not include residential uses. After reviewing the Proposed Future Land Use for the West Woodlawn RPA, we determined that there will be no units impacted by changes to the existing land use. Therefore, the number of inhabited residential units that may be removed due to future land use change is zero.

We have identified all of the inhabited units that meet the criteria described above in order to arrive at a reasonable projection of the total number of inhabited residential units that may be removed as a result of redevelopment projects that are undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. Though our analysis above suggests that no inhabited residential units are likely to be removed, it is uncertain whether any such units will actually be removed as a result of projects within the RPA.

Based on the income distributions in and around the RPA, it is reasonable to assume that approximately 94% of households that may be displaced during the life of the RPA are of moderate, low, very low, or very, very low income. However, it is possible that a higher percentage, up to 100%, of potentially displaced households lie within these income brackets. Part II, subpart (iii) of this section discusses in detail the availability of replacement housing for households of low income or lower.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107367

(ii) Relocation Plan

The City's plan for relocation assistance for those qualified residents in the West Woodlawn RPA whose residences may be removed shall be consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 11 -74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act. The terms and conditions of such assistance are described in subpart (iv) below. No specific relocation plan has been prepared by the City as of this date; until such a redevelopment project is approved, there is no certainty that any removal of residences will actually occur.

(iii) Replacement Housing

In accordance with Subsection 11 -74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act, the City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that affordable replacement housing located in or near the West Woodlawn RPA is available for any qualified displaced residents.

To promote development of affordable housing, the Redevelopment Plan requires that developers who receive tax increment financing assistance for market-rate housing are to set aside at least 20 percent of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Housing. Generally, this means that income-restricted rental units should be affordable to households earning no more than 60 percent of the area median income (adjusted for family size). If, during the 23-year life of the West Woodlavm RPA, the acquisition plans change, the City shall make every effort to ensure that appropriate replacement housing will be found in the Redevelopment Project Area or the surrounding Woodlawn Community Area.

In order to determine the availability of replacement housing for those residents who may potentially be displaced by redevelopment activity, S. B. Friedman & Company examined several data sources, including vacancy data from the 2000 U.S. Census, apartment listings from local newspapers, and housing sales data from Multiple Listing Service.

Vacancy Data

According to the 2000 Census, the 13 Block Groups surrounding and encompassing the West Woodlawn RPA contained 7,277 housing units, of which 925 (13%) were vacant. For the purposes of this analysis, the term "RPA Vicinity" refers to these Block Groups. The following table shows the distribution of vacant residential units in the RPA by vacancy status, as compared to the City of Chicago as a whole.

Vacancy Status	Vacancy Rate by Vacancy Status
Vacancy Status	Citvwide Percentage
1OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY OF CHICAGO JUN 30 2011 RAHM EMANUEL MAYOR June 22, 2011 BY: COMPTROLLER L.G.A.D. Hand-delivered June M. Canello TIF Administrator, Local Government Office of the Illinois Comptroller 100 West Randolph - Suite 15-500 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Re: Notice of the Designation of a City of Chicago TIF Administrator for Purposes of Filing the 2010 Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery Annual Reports for the City of Chicago (the "City") Dear Ms. Canello: This letter is intended to meet the requirements of your office as set forth in the "TIF Administrator Contact Information" section of your office's 'Tax Increment Finance Report Instructions" for fiscal year 2010. Please be advised that the City's Department of Housing and Economic Development (the "Department"), which is the successor department to the prior Department of Community Development, has the primary responsibility for preparing and filing the Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery annual reports with the Illinois Comptroller as required by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4 et seq. and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6 et seq. The administrative head of the Department, and thus the TIF Administrator for the City, is the Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Economic Development (the "Commissioner"). Andrew J. Mooney has been the Commissioner of the Department since February 9,2011 and remains in that position to the present day. He is the TIF Administrator for the City for purposes of filing the City's 2010 Tax Increment and Industrial Jobs Recovery Annual Reports. Sincerely, Mayor 2010 Annual Report West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/ll-74.4-5(d) June 30,2011 COM PTBOLUER ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA Name of Municipality: Chicago County:Cook UnitCode: 016/620/30 Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010 Fiscal Year End: 12/ 31 72010 First Name: Andrew J. Address: City Hall 121 N. LaSalle Telephone: (312)744-0025 E-Mail: TIFReports@cityofchicago.org Last Name:'Mooney Title: TIF Administrator City: Chicago, IL Zip: 60602 I attest to the best of hay knowledge, this report of the redevelopment project areas.in: City/Village of Chicago _is complete and accurate at the end of this reporting . Fiscal year under the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 et, seq.] ■ Or the industrial Jobs Recovery Law [65 ILCS 5/11 -74.6-10 et. seq.] Written signature Jf /--) of TIF Aamlnisjfrator Date Section 1 (65 iLCS 5/11-74.4-5, (d) (1.5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (1.5)) FILL OUT OfJF FOR EACH I IF Dl >TFICT Name of Redevelopment Project AreaDate DesignatedDate Terminated105th/Vincennes10/3/200112/31/2025111th Street/Kedzie Avenue Business District9/29/19999/29/2022119th and Halsted2/6/200212/31/2026119th/l-5711/6/200212/31/2026126th and Torrence12/21/199412/21/2017134th and Avenue K3/12/20083/12/203224th/Michigan7/21/19997/21/202226th and King Drive1/11/200612/31/203035th and Wallace12/15/199912/31/202335th/Halsted1/14/199712/31/202135th/State1/14/200412/31/202840th/State3/10/200412/31/202843rd/Cottage Grove7/8/19987/8/202145th/Western Industrial Park Conservation Area3/27/200212/31/202647th/Ashland3/27/200212/31/202647th/Halsted5/29/200212/31/202647th/King Drive3/27/200212/31/202647th/State7/21/200412/31/202849th Street/St. Lawrence Avenue1/10/199612/31/202051st/ Archer5/17/200012/31/202453rd Street1/10/200112/31/202560th and Western5/9/19965/9/2019"All statutory citations refer to one of two sections of the Illinois Municipal Code: el seq.] or the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law [65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-10 et. seq.] the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 James K/t'ltwiiiKim (.'enter l.oeal Go\ eminent l)iviim. Kill W. )Wjiilt.]\|ill Slivei. .Suite I,>.;«> Otaasp. fi.Wtfior Tel.! (!W7) 'Mi :WD> l_; Hit) 81 WifflS B-iimI: im^A^iiwTUK^I.ue.il.iK COMPTROLLER w^Jtetitt,!l.w.' ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010 County:Cook Fiscal Year End: 12/31 /2010 UnitCode: 016/620/30 63rd/Ashland3/29/200612/31/203063rd/Pulaskl5/17/200012/31/202467th/Clcero10/2/200212/31/202669th/Ashland11/3/200412/31/202871st and Stony Island10/7/199810/7/202172nd and Cicero11/17/199311/17/201673rd and Kedzie11/17/199311/17/201673rd/Universlty9/13/200612/31/203079th and Cicero6/8/20057/8/202179th Street Corridor7/8/199812/31/202579th Street/Southwest Highway10/3/200112/31/202979thA/incennes9/27/200712/31/203183rd/Stewart3/31/200412/31/202887th/Cottage Grove11/13/200212/31/202689th and State4/1/19984/1/202195th and Western7/13/19957/13/201895th Street and Stony Island5/16/19905/16/2013Addison Corridor North6/4/19976/4/2020Addison South5/9/200712/31/2031Archer Courts5/12/199912/31/2023Archer/ Central5/17/200012/31/2024Archer/Western2/11/200912/31/2033Armitage/Pulaski6/13/200712/31/2031Austin/Commercial9/27/200712/31/2031Avalon Park/South Shore7/31/200212/31/2026Avondale7/29/200912/31/2033Belmont/ Central1/12/200012/31/2024Belmont/Cicero1/12/200012/31/2024Bronzeville11/4/199812/31/2022Bryn Mawr/Broadway12/11/199612/11/2019Calumet Avenue/Cermak Road7/29/19987/29/2021Calumet River3/10/21012/31/2034Canal/Congress11/12/199812/31/2022Central West2/16/200012/31/2024Chatham-Ridge12/18/198612/31/2010 (1)Chicago/ Kingsbury4/12/200012/31/2024Chicago/Central Park2/27/200212/31/2026Chicago Lakeside Development - Phase 1 (USX)5/12/201012/31/2034Chinatown Basin12/18/198612/31/2010Cicero/Archer5/17/200012/31/2024Clark Street and Ridge Avenue9/29/19999/29/2022Clark/Montrose7/7/19997/7/2022Commercial Avenue11/13/200212/31/2026Devon/Sheridan3/31/200412/31/2028(1)This TIF has been terminated; however, the sales tax portion continues to exist for the sole purpose of servicing outstanding obligations which may be retired early at which point the sales tax portion will also terminate. ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPlNKA Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010 County:Cook Fiscal Year End: 12/31 /2010 UnitCode: 016/620/30 Devon/Western11/3/199912/31/2023Diversey/ Narragansett2/5/200312/31/2027Division/Homan6/27/200112/31/2025Division/North Branch3/15/19913/15/2014Division-Hooker7/10/19967/10/2019Drexel Boulevard7/10/200212/31/2026Eastman/North Branch10/7/199310/7/2016Edgewater12/18/198612/18/2009Edgewater/ Ashland10/1/200312/31/2027Elston/Armstrong Industrial Corridor7/19/200712/31/2031Englewood Mall11/29/198911/29/2012Englewood Neighborhood6/27/200112/31/2025Ewing Avenue3/10/201012/31/2034Forty-first Street and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive7/13/19947/13/2017Fuilerton/ Milwaukee2/16/200012/31/2024Galewood/Armitage Industrial7/7/19997/7/2022Goose Island7/10/19967/10/2019Greater Southwest Industrial Corridor (East)3/10/199912/31/2023Greater Southwest Industrial Corridor (West)4/12/200012/31/2024Harlem Industrial Park Conservation Area3/14/200712/31/2031Harrison/Central7/26/200612/31/2030Hollywood/Sheridan11/7/200712/31/2031Homan/Grand Trunk12/15/199312/15/2016Homan-Arthington2/5/19982/5/2021Howard-Paulina10/14/198810/14/2011Humboldt Park Commercial6/27/200112/31/2025Irving Park/Elston5/13/200912/31/2033Irving/Cicero6/10/199612/31/2020Jefferson Park Business District9/9/19989/9/2021Jefferson/ Roosevelt8/30/200012/31/2024Kennedy/Kimball3/12/20083/12/2032Kinzie Industrial Corridor6/10/19986/10/2021Kostner Avenue11/5/200811/5/2032Lake Calumet Area Industrial12/13/200012/31/2024Lakefront3/27/200212/31/2026Lakeside/Clarendon7/21/200412/31/2028LaSalle Central11/15/200612/31/2030Lawrence/ Kedzie2/16/200012/31/2024Lawrence/Broadway6/27/200112/31/2025Lawrence/Pulaski2/27/200212/31/2026Lincoln Avenue11/3/199912/31/2023Lincoln-Belmont-Ashland11/2/199411/2/2017Little Village East4/22/200912/31/2033Little Village Industrial Corridor6/13/200712/31/2031 ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA Name of Municipality: Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010 CountyCook Fiscal Year End: 12/31 /2010 UnitCode: 016/620/30 Madden/Wells11/6/200212/31/2026Madison/Austin Corridor9/29/199912/31/2023Michigan/Cermak9/13/19899/13/2012Midway Industrial Corridor2/16/200012/31/2024Midwest5/17/200012/31/2024Montclare8/30/200012/31/2024Montrose/Clarendon6/30/201012/31/2034Near North7/30/19977/30/2020Near South11/28/199012/31/2014Near West3/23/198912/31/2013North Branch (North)7/2/199712/31/2021North Branch (South)2/5/19982/5/2021North Pullman6/30/200912/31/2033North-Cicero7/30/19977/30/2020Northwest Industrial Corridor12/2/199812/2/2021Ogden/Pulaski4/9/20084/9/2032Ohio/Wabash6/7/200012/31/2024Pershlng/KIng9/5/200712/31/2031Peterson/ Cicero2/16/200012/31/2024Peterson/ Pulaski2/16/200012/31/2024Pilsen Industrial Corridor6/10/199812/31/2022Portage Park9/9/19989/9/2021Pratt/Ridge Industrial Park Conservation Area6/23/200412/31/2028Pulaski Corridor6/9/19996/9/2022Randolph and Wells6/9/201012/31/2034Ravenswood Corridor. 3/9/200512/31/2029Read-Dunning1/11/199112/31/2015River South7/30/19977/30/2020River West1/10/200112/31/2025Roosevelt/Canal3/19/199712/31/2021Roosevelt/Cicero2/5/19982/5/2021Roosevelt/Racine11/4/199812/31/2022Roosevelt/Union5/12/19995/12/2022Roosevelt-Homan12/5/199012/5/2013Roseland/Michigan1/16/200212/31/2026Sanitary Drainage and Ship Canal7/24/19917/24/2014South Chicago4/12/200012/31/2024South Works Industrial11/3/199912/31/2023Stevenson/Brighton4/11/200712/31/2031Stockyards Annex12/11/199612/31/2020Stockyards Industrial Commercial3/9/19893/9/2012Stockyards Southeast Quadrant Industrial2/26/19922/26/2015Stony Island Avenue Commercial and Burnside Industrial Corridors6/10/19986/10/2021Touhy/Westem9/13/200612/31/2030C QMP.TROLLE R ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REPORT OFFICE OF ILLINOIS COMPTROLLER JUDY BAAR TOPINKA Name of Municipality; Chicago Reporting Fiscal Year: 2010 County:Cook Fiscal Year End: 12 /31 /2010 UnitCode: 016/620/30 Weed/Fremont1/8/20081/8/2032West Grand6/10/19966/10/2019West Irving Park1/12/200012/31/2024West Pullman Industrial Park3/11/19983/11/2021West Ridge-Peterson Avenue10/27/198612/31/2010West Woodlawn5/12/201012/31/2034Western Avenue North1/12/200012/31/2024Western Avenue Rock Island2/8/200612/31/2024Western Avenue South1/12/200012/31/2030Western/Ogden2/5/19982/5/2021Wilson Yard6/27/200112/31/2025Woodlawn1/20/19991/20/2022COMPTROLLER SECTION 2 [Sections 2 through 5 must be completed for each redevelopment project area listed in Section 1.] Name of Redevelopment Project Area: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area *Primary Use of Redevelopment Project Area: Combination/Mixed_"__ If "Combination/Mixed" List Component Types: Commercial/Residential___ Under which section ofthe Illinois Municipal Code was Redevelopment Project Area designated? (check one): Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act X _Industrial Jobs Recovery Law _ NoYesWere there any amendments to the redevelopment plan, the redevelopment project area, or the State Sales Tax Boundary? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (1) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (1)] If ves, please enclose the amendment labeled Attachment AXCertification of the Chief Executive Officer of the municipality that the municipality has complied with all of the requirements ofthe Act during the preceding fiscal year. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (3) and 5/11-74.6 22 (d) (3)] Please enclose the CEO Certification labeled Attachment Bmmm iXOpinion of legal counsel that municipality is in compliance with the Act. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (4) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d)(4)] Please enclose the Leqal Counsel Opinion labeled Attachment CXWere there any activities undertaken in furtherance of the objectives of the redevelopment plan, including any project implemented in the preceding fiscal year and a description of the activities undertaken? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (A and B) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (A and B)] If ves, please enclose the Activities Statement labeled Attachment DXWere any agreements entered into by the municipality with regard to the disposition or redevelopment of any property within the redevelopment project area or the area within the State Sales Tax Boundary? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (C) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (C)] If ves, please enclose the Aqreement(s) labeled Attachment EXIs there additional information on the use of all funds received under this Division and steps taken by the municipality to achieve the objectives of the redevelopment plan? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (D) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d)(7) (D)] If ves, please enclose the Additional Information labeled Attachment FXDid the municipality's TIF advisors or consultants enter into contracts with entities or persons that have received or are receiving payments financed by tax increment revenues produced by the same TIF? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (E) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (E)] If yes, please enclose the contract(s) or description ofthe contract(s) labeled Attachment GXWere there any reports or meeting minutes submitted to the municipality by the joint review board? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (F) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (F)] If ves, please enclose the Joint Review Board Report labeled Attachment HXWere any obligations issued by municipality? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (8) (A) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (8) (A)] If yes, please enclose the Official Statement labeled Attachment IXWas analysis prepared by a financial advisor or underwriter setting forth the nature and term of obligation and projected debt service including required reserves and debt coverage? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (8) (B) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (8) (B)] If yes, please enclose the Analysis labeled Attachment JXCumulatively, have deposits equal or greater than $100,000 been made into the special tax allocation fund? 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (2) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (2) If yes, please enclose Audited financial statements of the special tax allocation fund labeled Attachment KXCumulatively, have deposits of incremental revenue equal to or greater than $100,000 been made into the special tax allocation fund? [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (9) and 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (9)] If yes, please enclose a certified letter statement reviewing compliance with the Act labeled Attachment LXA list ot all intergovernmental agreements in effect in FY 2010, to which the municipality is a part, and an accounting of any money transferred or received by the municipality during that fiscal year pursuant to those intergovernmental agreements. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (10)] If yes, please enclose list only ofthe intergovernmental agreements labeled Attachment M*X Types include: Central Business District, Retail, Other Commercial, Industrial, Residential, and Combination/Mixed. FY 2010 Section 2 SECTION 3.1 - (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5)) Provide an analysis ofthe special tax allocation fund. \| Reporting Year \| Cumulative * \| Fund Balance at Beginning of Reporting Period Revenue/Cash Receipts Deposited in Fund During Reporting FY: % of TotalProperty Tax Increment0%State Sales Tax Increment0%Local Sales Tax Increment0%State Utility Tax Increment0%Local Utility Tax Increment0%Interest0%Land/Building Sale Proceeds0%Bond Proceeds0%Transfers in from Municipal Sources (Porting in)0%Private Sources0%Other (identify source ; if multiple other sources, attach schedule)0%Total Amount Deposited In Special Tax Allocation Fund During Reporting Period Cumulative Total Revenues/Cash Receipts Total Expenditures/Cash Disbursements (Carried forward from Section 3.2) Transfers out to Municipal Sources (Porting out) Distribution of Surplus Total Expenditures/Disbursements NET INCOME/CASH RECEIPTS OVER/(UNDER) CASH DISBURSEMENTS FUND BALANCE, END OF REPORTING PERIOD LX 0% - if there is a positive fund balance at the end ofthe reporting period, you must complete Section 3.3 * Except as set forth in the next sentence, each amount reported on the rows below, if any, is cumulative from the inception of the respective Project Area. Cumulative figures for the categories of 'Interest,' 'Land/Building Sale Proceeds' and 'Other' may not be fully available for this report due to either of the following: (i) the disposal of certain older records pursuant to the City's records retention policy, or (ii) the availability of records only from January 1,1997 forward. FY 2010 TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevlopment Proiect Area SECTION 3.2 A- (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5)) ITEMIZED LIST OF ALL EXPENDITURES FROM THE SPECIAL TAX ALLOCATION FUND (by category of permissible redevelopment cost, amounts expended during reporting period) FOR AMOUNTS >$10,000 SECTION 3.2 B MUST BE COMPLETED Category of Permissible Redevelopment Cost [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 (q) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-10 (o)] Reporting Fiscal Year 1. Costs of studies, administration and professional servicesSubsections (q)(1) and (o) (1)i -"it _} i *¥\ V it W tl tf i¹ f1 1- , .' ■-. '9$2. Cost of marketing sitesSubsections (q)(1.6) and (o)(1.6)< , .t ft 1 V"'"'$3. Property assembly, demolition, site preparation and environmental site improvement costs. Subsection (q)(2), (o)(2) and (o)(3)t'i ■? i -1(i ¹ i - ,* !$4. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, repair or remodeling and replacement of existing public buildings. Subsection (q)(3) and (o)(4)mmmmmm sP#\|>llfli#«Mf«IF f ^ T^uVi<, » ^ ~"$5. Costs of construction of public works and improvements. Subsection (q)(4) and (o)(5)t ~ 1)f> !<■ ^x-r~J _v «■ -iff$6. Costs of removing contaminants required by environmental laws or rules (o)(6) - Industrial Jobs Recovery TIFs ONLYt>; fi¹-^N i , ~ r> »$FY 2010 TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area 7. Cost of job training and retraining, including "welfare to work" programs Subsection (q)(5), (o)(7) and (o)(12), _ti ;r~,;s* v i jV i f«. " 14 $8. Financing costs. Subsection (q) (6) and (o)(8)! £ < f » ■ ! ■^ - ,"lUllHliiilllgliiSiil$9. Approved capital costs. Subsection (q)(7) and (o)(9)mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm$10. Cost of Reimbursing school districts for their increased costs caused by TIF assisted housing projects. Subsection (q)(7.5) - Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLYk mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmmmmm ⁱ^fs?imnMMirm$11. Relocation costs. Subsection (q)(8) and (o)(10)mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm-: mmmmmmmmmm$12. Payments in lieu of taxes. Subsection (q)(9) and (o)(11)mmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmwmmmmmmmmmmmm$13. Costs of job training, retraining advanced vocational or career education provided by other taxing bodies. Subsection (q)(10) and (o)(12)m^m§mmmmmmmmmwsmmwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmimmmmmsmmmmmmimmmmmmMm$FY 2010 TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area 14. Costs of reimbursing private developers for interest expenses incurred on approved redevelopment projects. Subsection (q)(11)(A-E) and (o)(13)(A-E). > ^f, ■ «,J> l tf" _f ^ ~r ^r$15. Costs of construction of new housing units for low income and very low-income households Subsection (q)(11)(F) - Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY■i$16. Cost of day care services and operational costs of day care centers. Subsection (q) (11.5) -Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment TIFs ONLY> >T t$[TOTAL ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES I I $ FY 2010 TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area Section 3.2 B List all vendors, Including other municipal funds, that were paid in excess of $10,000 during the current reporting year. X_ There were no vendors, Including other municipal funds, paid in excess of $10,000 during the current reporting period. FY 2010 TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevlopment Proiect Area SECTION 3.3 - (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) 65 ILCS 11-74.6-22 (d) (5)) Breakdown ofthe Balance in the Special Tax Allocation Fund At the End ofthe Reporting Period (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (5) (D) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (5) (D)) FUND BALANCE, END OF REPORTING PERIOD Amount of Original Issuance Amount Designated Reserved for debt service$$Total Amount Designated for Obligations Designated for future redevelopment project costs$Total Amount Designated for Project Costs *TOTAL AMOUNT DESIGNATED SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)** $ $ NOTE: If a surplus is calculated, the municipality may be required to repay the amount to overlapping taxing districts. FY 2010 TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area SECTION 4 [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (6) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (6)]* Provide a description of all property purchased by the municipality during the reporting fiscal year within the redevelopment project area. Property Acquired by the Municipality Within the Redevelopment Project Area Property (1):Street address:6714 S. Rhodes AveuneApproximate size or description of property:3,100 square ft.Purchase price:Seller of property:N/AFY 2010 TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area SECTION 5 - 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (7) (G) and 65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-22 (d) (7) (G) Please include a brief description of each project. X No Projects Were Undertaken by the Municipality Within the Redevelopment Project Area FY 2010 TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area ATTACHMENT A 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107323 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR WEST WOODLAWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA. [02010-6155] The Committee on Finance submitted the following report: CHICAGO, November 17, 2010. To the President and Members ofthe City Council: Your Committee on Finance, having had under consideration an ordinance authorizing the approval of an amendment to the West Woodlawn Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan and Project, having had the same under advisement, begs leave to report and recommend that Your Honorable Body Pass the proposed ordinance transmitted herewith. This recommendation was concurred in by a viva voce vote of the members of the Committee. Respectfully submitted, (Signed) EDWARD M. BURKE, Chairman. On motion of Alderman Burke, the said proposed ordinance transmitted with the foregoing committee report was Passed by yeas and nays as follows: Yeas -- Aldermen Moreno, Fioretti, Dowell, Preckwinkle, Hairston, Lyle, Jackson, Harris, Beale, Pope, Balcer, Cardenas, Olivo, Burke, Foulkes, Thompson, Thomas, Lane, Rugai, Cochran, Brookins, Mufioz, Zaiewski, Dixon, Soils, Maldonado, Burnett, E. Smith, Graham, Reboyras, Suarez, Waguespack, Mell, Austin, Colon, Rice, Mitts, Allen, Laurino, O'Connor, Doherty, Reilly, Daley, Tunney, Levar, Shiller, Schulter, M. Smith, Moore, Stone - 50. A/ays - None. Alderman Pope moved to reconsider the foregoing vote. The motion was lost. The following is said ordinance as passed: WHEREAS, The City of Chicago (the "City"), by an ordinance adopted by the City Council ofthe City (the "City Council") on May 12, 2010, approved a redevelopment plan and project (the "Original Plan") for a portion of the City known as the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "Original Redevelopment Project Area") for the purpose of implementing tax increment allocation financing ("Tax Increment Allocation Financing") pursuant to the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et. seq., as amended (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, The City Council adopted an ordinance on May 12, 2010 designating the Ohginal Redevelopment Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act; and 107324 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 WHEREAS, The City Council adopted an ordinance on May 12, 2010 adopting Tax Increment Allocation Financing for the Original Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to the Act; and WHEREAS, It is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens of the City for the City to encourage development of areas located adjacent to the Original Redevelopment Project Area by adding a certain additional parcel (the "Added Area") to the Original Redevelopment Project Area and designating such expanded project area as a redevelopment project area under the Act to be known as the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "Expanded Area"); and- WHEREAS, The City desires further to supplement and amend the Original Plan for the Original Redevelopment Project Area to provide for the redevelopment of the Expanded Area; and WHEREAS, The City has caused to be prepared an eligibility study entitled "West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment Number 1" and dated July 1, 2010 (the "Eligibility Study") of the Added Area, which Eligibility Study confirms the existence within the Added Area of various blighting factors as set forth in the Act and supports a finding of eligibility of the Added Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act; and WHEREAS, The Original Plan, togetherwith the Eligibility Study (collectively, the 'Amended Plan"), provides for the Expanded Area; and WHEREAS, A copy of the Amended Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, It is desirable and in the best interest of the citizens of the City for the City to implement Tax Increment Allocation Financing pursuant to the Act for the Expanded Area described in Section 2 of this ordinance, to be redeveloped pursuant to the Amended Plan; and WHEREAS, The Community Development Commission (the "Commission") of the City has heretofore been appointed by the Mayor of the City with the approval of its City Council (collectively, the City Council and the Mayor are referred to herein as the "Corporate Authorities") (as codified in Section 2-124 of the City's Municipal Code) pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act; and WHEREAS, The Commission is empowered by the Corporate Authorities to exercise certain powers enumerated in Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act, including the holding of certain public hearings required by the Act; and WHEREAS, By authority of the Corporate Authorities in accordance with' Section 5/11-74.4-4.2 ofthe Act and pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) ofthe Act, the City's Department of Community Development established an interested parties registry and, on December 14, 2009, published in the Chicago Sun-Times or Chicago Tribune a notice that interested persons may register in order to receive information on the proposed designation ofthe Original Redevelopment Project Area or the approval ofthe Original Plan; and WHEREAS, Notice of a public meeting (the "Public Meeting") was made pursuant to notices from the City's Commissioner of the Department of Community Development, given on dates not less than 15 days before the date of the Public Meeting: (i) on June 9, 2010 by certified 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107325 mail to all taxing districts having real property in the proposed Expanded Area and to all entities requesting that information that have taken the steps necessary to register to be included on the interested parties registry for the proposed Expanded Area in accordance -with Section 5/11-74.4-4.2 ofthe Act, and (ii) with a good faith effort, on June 11, 2010 by regular mail to all residents and the last known persons who paid property taxes on real estate in the proposed Expanded Area (which good faith effort was satisfied by such notice being mailed to each residential address and the person or persons in whose name property taxes were paid on real property for the last preceding year located in the proposed Expanded Area), which to the extent necessary to effectively communicate such notice, was given in English and in other languages; and WHEREAS, The Public Meeting was held in compliance with the requirements of Section 5/11-74.4-6(e) ofthe Act on June 28,2010 at 6:00 P.M. at Dulles Elementary School, 6311 South Calumet Avenue, Chicago, Illinois; and WHEREAS, The Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report attached thereto as an exhibit and, if applicable, the feasibility study and the housing impact study) was made available for public inspection and review pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-5(a) of the Act since July 2, 2010, being a date not less than 10 days before the meeting of the Commission at which the Commission adopted Resolution 10-CDC-46 on July 13, 2010, accepting the Amended Plan for review and fixing the time and place for a public hearing ("Hearing"), at the offices of the City Clerk, and the City's Department of Community Development; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) of the Act, notice ofthe availability of the Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report attached thereto as an exhibit and, if applicable, the feasibility study and the housing impact study) was sent by mail on July 30, 2010, which is within a reasonable time after the adoption by the Commission of Resolution 10-CDC-46 to: (a) all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, were determined to be (i) located within the Expanded Area and (ii) located within 750 feet of the boundaries ofthe Expanded Area (or, if applicable, were determined to be the 750 residential addresses that were closest to the boundaries of the Expanded Area); and (b) organizations and residents that were registered interested parties for such Expanded Area; and WHEREAS, Due notice of the Hearing was given pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-6 of the Act, said notice being given to all taxing districts having property within the Expanded Area and to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity of the State of Illinois by certified mail on July 16, 2010, by publication in the C/i/'cago Sun-Times or C/j/cago Tribune on August 21, 2010 and August 28, 2010, by certified mail to taxpayers within the Expanded Area on August 31, 2010; and WHEREAS, A meeting of the joint review board established pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(b) of the Act (the "Board") was convened upon the provision of due notice on August 6, 2010 at 10:00 A.M., to review the matters properly coming before the Board and to allow it to provide its advisory recommendation regarding the approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Expanded Area, and other matters, if any, properly before it; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Sections 5/11-74,4-4 and 5/11 .-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission held the Hearing concerning approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Expanded 107326 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Expanded Area pursuant to the Act on September 14, 2010; and WHEREAS, The Commission has forwarded to the City Council a copy of its Resolution 10-CDC-52 attached hereto as Exhibit B, adopted on September 14, 2010, recommending to the City Council approval of the Amended Plan, among other related matters; and WHEREAS, The Corporate Authorities have reviewed the Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report attached thereto as an exhibit and, if applicable, the feasibility study and the housing impact study), testimony from the Public Meeting and the Hearing, if any, the recommendation of the Board, if any, the recommendation ofthe Commission and such other matters or studies as the Corporate Authorities have deemed necessary or appropriate to make the findings set forth herein, and are generally informed of the conditions existing in the Expanded Area; now, therefore, Be /f Orda/ned by the City Council ofthe City of Chicago: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. The Expanded Area. The Expanded Area is legally described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein. The street location (as near as practicable) for the Expanded Area is described in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein. The map of the Expanded Area is depicted on Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION 3. Findings. The Corporate Authorities hereby make the following findings as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(n) of the Act: a. The Expanded Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be expected to be developed without the adoption of the Amended Plan; b. The Amended Plan: (i) conforms to the comprehensive plan for the development of the City as a whole; or (ii) either (A) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the Chicago Plan Commission or (B) includes land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission; c. The Amended Plan meets all ofthe requirements of a redevelopment plan as defined in the Act and, as set forth in the Amended Plan, the estimated date of completion of the projects described therein and retirement of all obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs is not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in subsection (b) of Section 11-74.4-8 of the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year after the year in which the ordinance approving the Original Redevelopment Project Area was adopted, and, as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-7 of the Act, no such obligation shall have a maturity date greater than 20 years; 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107327 d. Within the Amended Plan, if applicable: (i) as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(5) of the Act, the housing impact study: a) includes data on residential unit type, room type, unit occupancy, and racial and ethnic composition of the residents; and b) identifies the number and location of inhabited residential units in the Expanded Area that are to be or may be removed, if any, the City's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the Expanded Area whose residences are to be removed, the availability of replacement housing for such residents and the type, location, and cost of the replacement housing, and the type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided; (ii) as provided in Section 5/11-74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act, there is a statement that households of low-income and very low-income persons living in residential units that are to be removed from the Expanded Area shall be provided affordable housing and relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations under that Act, including the eligibility criteria. SECTION 4. Approval Of The Amended Plan. The City hereby approves the Amended Plan pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act. SECTION 5. Powers Of Eminent Domain. In compliance with Section 5/11-74.4-4(c) of the Act and with the Amended Plan, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to negotiate for the acquisition by the City of parcels contained within the Expanded Area. In the event the Corporation Counsel is unable to acquire any of said parcels through negotiation, the Corporation Counsel is authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings to acquire such parcels. Nothing herein shall be in derogation of any proper authority. SECTION 6. Invalidity Of Any Section. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 7. Supersedes All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage. [Exhibit "E" referred to in this ordinance printed on page 107435 of this Journal.] Exhibits "A", "B", "C" and "D" referred to in ordinance read as follows: 107328 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Exhibit "A". (To Ordinance) West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Eligibility, Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project December 28, 2009 Revised: March 8, 2010. /. Executive Summary In April 2009, S. B. Friedman & Company was engaged to conduct a Tax Increment Financing Eligibility Study (the "Eligibility Study") for the proposed West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "West Woodlawn RPA" or "RPA"). This report details the eligibility factors found within the proposed West Woodlawn RPA in support of its designation as a "conservation area" within the definitions set forth in the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74,4-1 et seq.j as amended (the "Act"), and thus in support of its designation as the West Woodlawn RPA. In addition, since the Eligibility Study has determined that the RPA qualifies as a conservation area, this report also contains the Redevelopment Plan and Project (the "Redevelopment Plan" or "Redevelopment Plan and Project") for the West Woodlawn RPA. The West Woodlawn RPA is located almost wholly within the West Woodlavm Community Area ("Community Area") of the City of Chicago. A small portion of the RPA is located in the Greater Grand Grossing area. The RPA is generally bounded by East 60^,h Street on the north, Cottage Grove Avenue on the east, East 68^,h Street and South Chicago Avenue on the south, and Martin Luther King Drive and South Calumet Avenue on the west. Determination of Eligibility This Eligibility Study concludes that the West Woodlawn RPA is eligible for Tax Increment Financing .('TIF") designation as a "conservation area" because 50 percent or more of the structures in the area are 35 years in age or older and because the following four eligibility factors have been found to be present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA: 1. Deterioration 2. Inadequate Utilities 3. Structures Below Minimum Code 4. Lack of Community Planning Redevelopment Plan Goal, Objectives, and Strategies Goal. The overall goal of the Redevelopment Plan is to reduce or eliminate the conditions that qualify the West Woodlawn RPA as a conservation area, and to provide the mechanisms necessary to support public and private development and improvements in the RPA. This goal is to be achieved through an integrated and comprehensive strategy that leverages public resources to stimulate private investment in rehabilitation of existing structures and new development. Eliminating these conditions and . facilitating development within the RPA will facilitate 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107329 reestablishment of the RPA as a cohesive and vibrant mixed-use area that provides a broad range of both housing opportunities and commercial/retail uses, while accommodating public and institutional uses where appropriate. Redevelopment of the RPA will improve retail, commercial, and housing conditions; improve the relationship between the area's land uses; and attract private redevelopment. Objectives. Beven broad objectives support the overall goal of area-wide revitalization of the West Woodlawn RPA. These include: 1. Facilitate sustainable residential development and redevelopment that will accommodate current and future residents of the RPA, including a range of income levels and a variety of housing tenure (ownership versus rental); 2. Encourage high-quality retail development that promotes a lively pedestrian environment, incorporates enhanced plazas and green spaces, provides sufficient off-street parking, and . adequately serves households residing in the area; 3. Improve the quality and quantity of existing open space, plazas, and streetscape elements to provide the community with safe, attractive public gathering spaces; 4. Promote new commercial and residential development and redevelopment that is "transit-oriented" in nature and reflects site design and mixes of uses that promote transit ridership and accessibility 5. Provide resources for the rehabilitation and modernization of existing structures and the reuse and rehabilitation of architecturally and historically significant structures, especially those identified as "orange" on the Chicago Historic Resources Survey; 6. Provide resources for creation and/or improvement of community facilities to provide health/wellness, education, social support, and job training opportunities for RPA residents; 7. Improve vehicular circulation throughout the RPA, through improvements to streets, alleys and loading areas; 8. Improve public transit facilities within the RPA, including encouragement of upgrades to Chicago Transit Authority properties and facilities; 9. Replace or repair public infrastructure where needed, including streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, underground water and sanitary systems, alleys, bridges, and viaducts; 10. Provide opportunities for women-owned, minority-ovmed, and locally-owned businesses to share in job opportunities associated with the redevelopment of the West Woodlawn RPA, particularly in the design and construction industries; and 11. Support job training and welfare to work programs and increase employment opportunities for City and neighborhood residents; 107330 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Strategies. These objectives will be implemented through four specific and integrated strategies. These include: 1. Implement Public Improvements. A series of public improvements throughout the West Woodlawn RPA may be designed and implemented to build upon and improve the character of the area, and to. create a more conducive environment for private development. Public improvements that are implemented with TIF assistance are intended to complement and not replace existing funding sources for public improvements in the RPA. These improvements may include improvement of new streets, streetscaping, street and sidewalk lighting, alleyways, underground water and sewer infrastructure, parks or open space, and other public improvements consistent with the 'Redevelopment Plan and Project. These public improvements may be completed pursuant to redevelopment agreements with private entities or intergovernmental agreements with other public entities, and may include the construction, rehabilitation, renovation, or restoration of public improvements on one or more parcels. 2. Encourage Private Sector Activities and Support Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. Through the creation and support of public-private partnerships, or through written agreements, the City may provide financial and other assistance to encourage the private sector, including local property owners, to undertake rehabilitation and redevelopment projects and other improvements, in addition to programming such as job training and retraining, that are consistent with the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. The City may enter into redevelopment agreements or intergovernmental agreements with private or public entities to construct, rehabilitate, renovate, or restore private or public improvements on one or several parcels (collectively referred to as "Redevelopment Projects"). The City requires that developers who receive TIF assistance for market-rate housing set aside twenty percent (20 percent) of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Departmentof Community Development or any successor agency. Generally, this means that affordable for-sale housing units should be priced at a level that is affordable to persons earning no more than one hundred percent (100 percent) of the area median income, and affordable rental units should be affordable to persons earning no more than sixty percent (60 percent) of the area median income. TIF funds can also be used to pay for up to fifty percent (50 percent) ofthe cost'of construction or up to seventy five percent (75 percent) of interest costs for new housing units to be occupied by low-income and very low-income households as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. 3. Develop Vacant and Underutilized Sites. The redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties within the West Woodlawn RPA is expected to stimulate private investment and increase the overall taxable value of properties within the RPA. Development of vacant and/or underutilized sites is anticipated to have a positive impact on other properties beyond the individual project sites. 4. Facilitate Property Assembly, Demolition, and Site Preparation. Financial assistance may be provided to private developers seeking to acquire land, and to assemble and prepare sites in order to undertake projects in support of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. To meet the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, the City may acquire 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107331 and assemble property throughout the RPA. Land assemblage by the City may be by purchase, exchange, donation, lease, eminent domain, through the Tax Reactivation Program, or other programs and may be for the purpose of (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers, or (b) sale, lease, conveyance, or dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Site preparation may include such preparatory work as demolition of existing improvements and environmental remediation, where appropriate. Furthermore, the City may require written redevelopment agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the City may devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and development. Required Findings The conditions required under the Act for the adoption of the Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project are found to be present within the West Woodlawn RPA. 1. The RPA has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise. Rehabilitation and construction activity within the RPA has been limited to a small number of buildings and the total value of these construction projects has been minimal relative to the estimated market value of the area. 2. Without the support of public resources, the redevelopment objectives of the West Woodlawn RPA will most likely not be realized. TIF assistance may be used to fund rehabilitation, infrastructure improvements, and expansions to public facilities. Without the creation of the West Woodlavm RPA, these types of projects are not likely to occur. 3. The West Woodlawn RPA includes only the contiguous real property that is expected to substantially benefit from the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Project improvements. 2. Introduction The Study Area This document serves as the Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project for the West Woodlawn RPA. The West Woodlavm RPA is located within the Woodlavm Community Area of the City of Chicago (the "City"), in Cook County (the "County"). In April 2009, & B. Friedman & Company was engaged to conduct a study of certain properties in these neighborhoods to determine whether the area containing these properties would qualify for status as a "blighted area" and/or "conservation area" under the Act. The Eligibility Study and Plan summarizes the analyses and findings of S. B. Friedman & Company's work, which, unless otherwise noted, is the responsibility of S. B. Friedman & Company. The City is entitled to rely on the findings and conclusions of this Eligibility Study and Plan in designating the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area as a redevelopment proiect area under the Act. S. B. Friedman & Company has prepared this Plan and the related 107332 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Eligibility Study with the understanding that, the City would rely: 1) on the findings and conclusions of the Plan and the related Eligibility Study in proceeding with the designation of the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area and the adoption and implementation of the Plan, and 2) on the fact that S. B. Friedman & Company has obtained the necessary information so that the Plan and the related Eligibility Study will comply with the Act. The community context of the West Woodlawn RPA is detailed on Map 1. The RPA is generally bounded by East 60^,h Street on the north, Cottage Grove Avenue on the east, East 68^th Street and South Chicago Avenue on the south, and Martin Luther King Drive and South Calumet Avenue on the west. The RPA consists of 2,284 tax parcels on 64 blocks, and is located wholly within the City. Map 2 provides detail of the boundary of the West Woodlawn RPA, which includes only the contiguous real property that is expected to benefit substantially from the Redevelopment Plan and Project improvements discussed herein. Appendix 1 contains a legal description of the West Woodlawn RPA. The Eligibility Study covers events and conditions that exist and that were determined to support the designation of the West Woodlawn RPA as a "conservation area" under the Act at the completion of our research on September 3, 2009 and not thereafter. Events or conditions, such as governmental actions and additional developments, occurring after that date are excluded from the analysis. The improved parcels suffer from deterioration, inadequate utilities, and structures below minimum code. Without a comprehensive approach to address these issues, the RPA is not likely to see substantial private investment. The Redevelopment Plan and Project address these issues by providing the means to facilitate private development and rehabilitation, and the construction of public infrastructure. These improvements will benefit all of the property within the RPA by alleviating conditions qualifying the RPA as a conservation area. History of Community Area The West Woodlawn RPA is located almost entirely within the Woodlawn Community Area in the City of Chicago. A small portion of the West Woodlawn RPA, located west of Martin Luther King Drive, is part of the Greater Grand Crossing Community Area. The Woodlawn Community Area is located seven miles southeast of Chicago's Loop. It is bounded on the north by East 60^lh Street, on the east by South Drexel Avenue and South Cottage Grove Avenue, on the south by portions of East 67^th Street, East 68^,h Street and South Chicago Avenue, and on the west by South Martin Luther King Drive. Woodlawn was originally settled in the 1850s by Dutch farmers. Over the next 40 years, the population remained stable between 500 and 1,000 residents until 1890. The area was annexed by the City of Chicago along with other parts of the Hyde Park Township in 1889. I 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107333 The decision in 1893 to host the World's Columbian Exposition in Jackson Park brought 20,000 new residents and entrepreneurs to Woodlawn. Large apartment buildings and tourist hotels were constructed in the area to support the Exposition. During this time, the Midway Plaisance and the Elevated rail line along East 63^rd Street was developed. Following the closing of the fair, local boosters worked to heavily promote Woodlawn out of fear of an economic depression. Two commercial centers, the Washington Park Subdivision and the specialty shops along East 63^fd Street were developed to attract patrons to that area. The Washington Park Subdivision contained an amusement park, racetrack, and beer gardens that were popular in the early, part of the twentieth century. When gambling was outlawed in 1905, apartment houses replaced the racetrack in Washington Park. The specialty shops along East 63^rd Street attracted patrons from throughout Chicago. Despite commercial improvements to the area, the Woodlawn area was primarily residential. University of Chicago faculty chose to reside in the residences in the area in the early twentieth century. New developments in the southwest part of the neighborhood attracted middle-class African-Americans, who had the vneans to buy homes outside the nearby Black Belt. The economic decline and distress of the 1920s resulted in many of the East 63^rd Street businesses to fail. Taverns and similar businesses began to open and operate in these spaces and led to further neighborhood decline. In 1946, the Chicago Plan Commission designated Woodlawn eligible as a conservation area, but no plan was ever implemented to stall the neighborhood decline. By the 1960s, Woodlawn had housing stock that was overcrowded, deteriorated, and had few commercial attractions that could support its population. The neighborhood also began to experience an increase in gang-related violence. In the 1960s, residents, in a coalition with churches, block clubs, and business owners worked with community organizers to improve the neighborhood and create local economic renewal. Numerous arsons in the years following the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. resulted in more population decline in the neighborhood as people moved to other neighborhoods or communities. Woodlawn's population declined from a high of 81,279 in 1960 to 27,086 in 2000. Efforts have been underway in recent years to bring private development, commercial enterprises, and a bank back to Woodlawn with unsatisfactory results. Existing Land Use Based on S. B. Friedman & Company's research, six land uses have been identified within the West Woodlawn RPA: Mixed Uses (Residential over Commercial) Residential ■» Commercial Retail Uses Institutional Uses (Churches, Schools, Medical Facilities and Utilities) a Right-of-ways Vacant Land 107334 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 The existing land use pattern in the West Woodlawn RPA is shown in Map 3. This map represents the predominant land use in the area on a parcel_:by-parcel basis. The land use displayed was the land use most apparent during field observation. Overall, the area contains mainly residential uses. Major arterials such as Martin Luther King Drive and Cottage Grove contain a mix of retail uses. Small one-story retail establishments are located throughout the RPA. Historically Significant Structures S. B. Friedman & Company obtained data from the Chicago Historic Resources Survey (CHRS) to identify architecturally and/or historically significant buildings located within the West Woodlawn RPA. The CHRS identifies over 17,000 Chicago properties and contains information on buildings that may possess important architectural and/or historical significance. A ranking system was used to identify historic and architectural significance according to three criteria adopted by the CHRS: 1) age; 2) degree of external physical integrity; and 3) level of possible significance. According to this survey, seven (7) buildings in the West Woodlawn RPA have been identified by the CHRS as possessing some architectural feature or historical association that vnade them significant in the context of the. community. Several structures in the RPA are designated as Chicago Landmarks. The properties identified by the CHRS as having historic and architectural significance are listed in Table 1. Table 1: Historic Buildings in RPA NameAddresstype of BuildingStyleYear BuiltCHRS j Color CodeKing Drive El Station400 E. 63^M Street NANA1890sOrangePrivate Residence415 E. 60* Street2-3 FlatClassical Revival1897OrangePrivate Residence6156 S. Evans Avenue2-3 FlatCraftsman1912OrangePrivate Residence6330 S. Eberhart Avenue2-3 FlatClassical Revival1905OrangePrivate Residence6338 S. Evans AvenueNANANAGreenPrivate Residence6354 S. Evans AvenueSingle Family ResidenceQueen AnneNAOrangeSt. Stefan's Danish Evangelical Lutheran Church6359 S. Eberhart AvenueChurchGothic Revival1907OrangeSource: City of Chicago The location of these historic buildings is detailed on Map 3, along with current land uses within the RPA. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107335 3. Eligibility Analysis Provisions of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act Based upon the conditions found within the West Woodlawn RPA at the completion of S. B. Friedman & Company's research, it has been determined that the West Woodlavm RPA meets the eligibility requirements of the Act as a "conservation area." The following text outlines the provisions ofthe Act to establish eligibility. Under the Act, two primary avenues exist to establish eligibility for an area to permit the use of tax increment financing for area redevelopment: declaring an area as a "blighted area" and/or a "conservation area." "Blighted areas" are those improved or vacant areas with blighting influences that are impacting the public safety, health, morals, or welfare of the community, and are substantially impairing the growth of the tax base in the area. "Conservation areas" are those improved areas which are deteriorating and declining and may become blighted if the deterioration is not abated. The statutory provisions of the Act specify how a district can be designated as a "conservation" and/or "blighted area" district based upon an evidentiary finding of certain eligibility factors listed in the Act. The eligibility factors for each designation are identical for improved property. A separate set of factors exists for the designation of vacant land as a "blighted area." There is no provision for designating vacant land as a conservation area. Factors for Improved Property For improved property to constitute a "blighted area," a combination of five or more of the following 13 eligibility factors listed at 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3 (a) must be present to a meaningful extent and (b) be reasonably distributed throughout the RPA. A "Conservation area" must have a minimum of fifty percent (50%) ofthe total structures within the area aged 35 years or older, plus a combination of three or more of the 13 eligibility factors which are detrimental to the public safety, health, morals, or welfare and which could result in such an area becoming a blighted area. Dilapidation. An advanced state of disrepair or neglect of necessary repairs to the primary structural components of buildings or improvements in such a combination that a documented building condition analysis determines that major repair is required or the defects are so serious and so extensive that the buildings must be removed. Obsolescence. The condition or process of falling into disuse. Structures have become ill-suited for the original use. Deterioration. With respect to buildings, defects including, but not limited to, major defects in the secondary building components such as doors, windows, porches, gutters and dovmspouts, and fascia. With respect to surface improvements, that the condition of roadways, alleys, curbs, 107336 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking, and surface storage areas evidence deterioration including but not limited to, surface cracking, crumbling, potholes, depressions, loose paving material, and weeds protruding through paved surfaces. Presence of Structures Below Minimum Code Standards. All structures that do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire, and other governmental codes applicable to property, but not including housing and property maintenance codes. Illegal Use of Individual Structures. The use of structures in violation of the applicable Federal, State, or local laws, exclusive of those applicable to the presence of structures below minimum code standards. Excessive Vacancies. The presence of buildings that are unoccupied or underutilized and that represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent, or duration of the vacancies. Lack of Ventilation, Light or Sanitary Facilities. The absence of adequate ventilation for light or air circulation in spaces or rooms without windows, or that require the removal of dust, odor, gas, smoke, or other noxious airborne materials. Inadequate natural light and ventilation means the absence of skylights or windows for interior spaces or rooms and improper window sizes and amounts by room area to window area ratios. Inadequate sanitary facilities refers to the absence or inadequacy of garbage storage and enclosure, bathroom facilities, hot water and kitchens, and structural inadequacies preventing ingress and egress to and from all rooms and units within a building. Inadequate Utilities. Underground and overhead utilities such as storm sewers and storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and gas, telephone, and electrical services that are shown to be inadequate. Inadequate utilities are those that are: (i) of insufficient capacity to serve the uses in the redevelopment project area, (ii) deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete, or in disrepair, or (iii) lacking within the redevelopment project area. Excessive Land Coverage and Overcrowding of Structures and Community Facilities. The over-intensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities onto a site. Examples of problem conditions warranting the designation of an area as one exhibiting excessive land coverage are: (i) the presence of buildings either improperly situated on parcels or located on parcels of inadequate size and shape in relation to present-day standards of development for health and safety and (ii) the presence of multiple buildings on a single parcel. For there to be a finding of excessive land coverage, these parcels must exhibit one or more of the following conditions: insufficient provision for light and air within or around buildings, increased threat of spread of fire due to the close proximity of buildings, lack of adequate or proper access to a public right-of-way, lack of reasonably required off-street parking, or inadequate provision for loading and service. Deleterious Land Use or Layout. The existence of incompatible land use relationships, buildings occupied by inappropriate mixed uses, or uses considered to be noxious, offensive, or unsuitable for the surrounding area. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107337 Environmental Contamination. The proposed redevelopment project area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or Federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment ofthe redevelopment project area. Lack of Community Planning, The proposed redevelopment project area was developed prior to or without the benefit pr guidance of a community plan. This means that the development occurred prior to the adoption by the municipality of a comprehensive or other community plan or that the plan was not followed at the time of the area's development. This factor must be documented by evidence of adverse or incompatible land use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels pf inadequate shape and size to meet contemporary development standards, or other evidence demonstrating an absence of effective community planning. Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value. The total equalized assessed value of the proposed redevelopment project area has declined for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated; is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated. Factors for Vacant Land Under the provisions of the "blighted area" section of the Act, for vacant land to consfitute a "blighted area," a combination of two or more of the following six factors must be identified as being present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed and act in combination to impact the sound growth of the tax base for the proposed district. Obsolete Platting of Vacant Land. Parcels of limited or narrow size or configurations of parcels of irregular size or shape that would be difficult to develop on a planned basis and in a manner compatible with contemporary standards and requirements, or platting that failed to create rights-of-ways for streets or alleys or that created inadequate right-of-way widths for streets, alleys, or other public rights-of-way or that omitted easements for public utilities. Diversity of Ownership. Diversity of ownership is when adjacent properties are owned by multiple parties. When diversity of ownership of parcels of vacant land is sufficient in number to retard or impede the ability to assemble the land for development, this factor applies. Tax and Special Assessment Delinquencies. Tax and special assessment delinquencies exist or the property has been the subject of tax sales under the Property Tax Code within the last five years. 107338 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Deterioration of Structures or Site Improvements in Neighboring Areas Adjacent to the Vacant Land. Evidence of structural deterioration and area disinvestment in blocks adjacent to the vacant land may substantiate why new development had not previously occurred on the vacant parcels. Environmental Contamination. The area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or Federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area. Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value_t The total equalized assessed value of the proposed redevelopment project area has declined for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated; is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years prior to the year in which the redevelopment project area is designated. Additionally, under the "blighted area" section of the Act, eligibility may be established for those vacant areas that would have qualified as a blighted area immediately prior to becoming vacant. Under this test for establishing eligibility, building records may be reviewed to determine that a combination of five or more of the 13 "blighted area" eligibility factors for improved property listed above were present immediately prior to demolition of the area's structures. The vacant "blighted area" section includes six other tests for establishing eligibility but none of these are relevant to the conditions within the West Woodlawn RPA. Methodology Overview ahd Determination of Eligibility Analysis of eligibility factors was done through research involving an extensive field survey of all property within the West Woodlawn RPA, and a review of building and property records. Building and property records include building code violation citations, building permit data, assessor information, and information on the age and condition of sewer and water lines within the study area. Our survey of the area established that there are 1,497 primary structures and 2,284 tax parcels within the West Woodlawn RPA. The West Woodlawn RPA was examined for qualification factors consistent with either the "blighted area" or "conservation area" requirements of the Act. Based upon these criteria, the property within the West Woodlawn RPA qualifies for designation as a "conservation area" as defined by the Act. To arrive at this designation, S. B. Friedman & Company noted the number of eligibility factors 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107339 present, and analyzed the distribution of the eligibility factors on a building-by-building and/or parcel-by-parcel basis and analyzed the distribution ofthe eligibility factors on a block-by-block basis. When appropriate, we calculated the presence of eligibility factors on infrastructure and ancillary properties associated with the structures. The eligibility factors were correlated to buildings and/or parcels using structure-base maps, property files created from field observations, record searches, and field surveys. This information was then graphically plotted on a parcel map of the West Woodlavm RPA by block to establish the distribution of eligibility factors and to determine which factors were present to a major extent. Major factors are used to establish eligibility. These factors are present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA. Minor factors are supporting factors present to a meaningful extent on some ofthe parcels or on a scattered basis. Their presence suggests that the area is at risk of experiencing more extensive deterioration and disinvestment. To reasonably arrive at this designation, S. B. Friedman & Company documented the existence of qualifying eligibility factors and confirmed that a sufficient number of factors were present within the West Woodlawn RPA and reasonably distributed. Although it may be concluded under the Act that the mere presence ofthe minimum number of the stated factors may be sufficient to make a finding of the RPA as a conservation area, this evaluation was made on the basis that the conservation area factors must be present to an. extent that indicates that public intervention is appropriate or necessary. Conservation Area Findings As required by the Act, within a conservation area, at least fifty percent (50%) of the buildings must be 35 years of age or older, and at least three of the 13 eligibility factors must be found present to a major extent within the area. Establishing that at least 50 percent of the West Woodlawn RPA buildings are 35 years of age or older is a condition precedent to establishing the area as a conservation area under the Act. Based on information provided by the Cook County Assessor's office, we have established that of the 1,497 buildings located within the West Woodlawn RPA, 1,424 (95 percent) are 35 years of age or older. ¹ In addition to establishing that the West Woodlawn RPA meets the age requirement, our research has revealed that the following four factors are present to a major extent: 1. Deterioration 2. Inadequate Utilities - 3. Structures Below Minimum Code 4. Lack of Community Planning , The following factors were found to be present to a minor extent: 1. Deleterious Land Use or Layout 107340 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 2. Excessive Vacancies > Based on the presence of these factors, the RPA meets the minimum requirements of a "conservation area" under the Act. Most of the blocks located in the RPA either contain deteriorated buildings or are served by deteriorated infrastructure, including cracked or crumbling sidewalks, deteriorated alleys, and deteriorated roadways. Also nearly all the blocks comprising the RPA are serviced by inadequate utilities, particularly sewer lines that are overdue for repair or replacement. The high cost of upgrading these systems, coupled with the high presence of deteriorated properties in the area, increases the likelihood that buildings within the RPA will fall into disrepair or disuse. Maps 4A through 4E illustrate the presence and distribution of the major eligibility factors on a block-by-block basis within the RPA. The following sections summarize our field research as it pertains to each ofthe identified eligibility factors found within the West Woodlawn RPA. MAJOR FACTORS 1. Deterioration This factor was given to those buildings (and their corresponding parcels) where interior and/or exterior deterioration of buildings could be documented through surveys or interviews. Examples of the building deterioration observed in the field are structural cracks, spalling brick surfaces, wavy roofs, rotting window frames, holes in soffits, cracked and leaning porch steps, and broken windows. The two largest housing developments in the RPA, Parkway Gardens and Grove Pare Plaza Apartments, suffer from interior deferred maintenance and antiquated internal systems. Interviews with property managers unveiled problems with older heating and cooling systems, fire hazards in trash chutes, and inoperable elevators. Deterioration of public improvements is also evident throughout the West Woodawn RPA. Many of the streets and sidewalks, and nearly all of the alleys in the RPA exhibit some level of deterioration. Overall, 1,148 of the 2,284 parcels (50 percent) are affected by some level of deterioration. Surface area deterioration (such as alleys, streets, and sidewalks) affects 579 parcels (25 percent) within the RPA while 757 parcels (33 percent) exhibit building deterioration. Deterioration was deemed to be present to a meaningful extent on a given block if 50 percent or more of its parcels exhibited at least one type of deterioration. One or both of these types of deterioration is present to meaningful extent on 35 blocks (55 percent) within the RPA. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107341 2. Inadequate Utilities A review of the City's water and sewer atlases found that inadequate underground utilities affect 1,916 (or 84 percent) of the 2,284 tax parcels in the West Woodlavm RPA. This is due primarily to the number of antiquated sewer lines in the RPA, many of which were installed prior to 1909. These lines have surpassed their 100-year service lives and are in need of replacement or have been deemed inadequate by the City's water department.¹ The inadequate utilities factor was deemed to be present to a meaningful extent on a given block if 50 percent or more of its parcels exhibited the factor. Due to the age and condition of the sewer and water lines, inadequate utilities was found to be present to a major extent on 56 (or 88 percent) of the 64 blocks within the West Woodlawn RPA. 3. Presence of Structures Below Minimum Code Standards Relying on data provided by the City's Department of Buildings, 907 structural code violation citations were issued for 130 separate property addresses within the West Woodlawn RPA between January 2002 and July 2009. Analyzed on a block basis, buildings below code affect 32 of the 64 blocks (50 percent) of the blocks within the RPA. Structures below code standards indicate that a building is in a current state of non-compliance and could potentially fall into more severe disrepair. This continuing problem underscores the documented deterioration of buildings. 4. Lack of Community Planning Lack of community planning is assessed as an area-wide factor. It is not necessarily attributable to any one parcel but is substantiated by evidence of incompatible land use relationships, improper subdivisions, or inadequate land platting. There are several incidences, particularly along major thoroughfares that exhibit the lack of community planning throughout the RPA. The following outlines four significant examples of this factor. Existing Large Residential Developments. The parcel and building layout of both Grove Pare Plaza and Parkway Gardens are ill-configured for its current use as well as for future uses. Parkway Gardens, in particular, has limited vehicular access, which could be problematic in the event of an emergency. The development contains 694 units with no internal roadway network; only a frontage road surrounds the property. While Grove Pare Plaza does have large parking areas that could accommodate both private and emergency vehicles, its building layout and design does not allow for proper buffering between walkways, play areas, and incoming vehicular traffic. Additionally, per interviews with property managers and owners, the buildings' layouts in both developments create isolated pockets where crime activity can take place. The City of Chicago Department of Water Management defines the projected service life as 100 years. 107342 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 East 63'" Street. Much of the land in the RPA along 63^rd Street is vacant or underutilized and has been for several years. The chronic vacancy is due, in part, to the shallow depths of parcels relative to its location and zoning. This portion of 63^rd Street is zoned as a commercial/retail corridor and is directly adjacent to overhead Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) elevated train tracks. The presence of these tracks presents both a benefit and a drawback to commercial development along the street: While the overhead transit center attracts commuters and other pedestrian traff.c, visibility from the street and vehicular access is somewhat encumbered by the overhead tracks. In order to establish better visibility, in addition to accommodating its parking needs, most larger-scale, contemporary retail development is set back from the street. The parcel depths along 63^rd Street are not large enough to accommodate these more modem layouts of large-scale retail development. East 67"' Street. The portion of East 67^th Street that is located within the RPA has widely inconsistent land uses and ill-configured parcel layouts. Portions of East 67^,h Street serve as commercial/retail uses while other portions of the street include multi-family and single-family residential buildings. Additionally, the street in several places has mismatched parcel depths and orientation. There are buildings along the frontage of the street that are oriented towards 67^mStreet while others are oriented towards residential streets. The parcel orientation along 67^lhStreet makes it difficult tp encourage a harmonious development pattern for future development projects. South Chicago Avenue. The northeast frontage of South Chicago Avenue between East 67^thStreet and East 69'¹' Street features a myriad of land uses that are incompatible with contemporary development standards and could be regarded as deleterious. This two-block stretch of South Chicago Avenue contains light industrial, retail, mixed-use buildings (ground floor commercial with residential in upper floors), and single-family homes. The land uses bear no relationship to one another and appear to be developed without the benefit of any community planning. As discussed in the History of the Area section, the Woodlavm community area was designated as conservation area in the 1940s but a plan was never implemented to curtail neighborhood decline. The lack of an implementation plan has stalled redevelopment present day and has caused the West Woodlawn RPA to presently qualify as a conservation district. MINOR FACTORS 1. Deleterious Land Use and Layout ~» The deleterious land use and layout factor was found to be present in the RPA in instances where conflicting land uses and improper or unsafe interactions of parcels and rights-of-way were observed. Throughout much of the RPA, vacant parcels are present along commercial corridors and interspersed with residential parcels. Many of these parcels are unsecured or insufficiently secured and contain trash, construction materials, and other debris that create a health and safety hazard for nearby residents, especially children. Approximately 10 percent of the RPA's land area consists of unsecured vacant land parcels. The extensive presence of these conditions is incompatible with nearby residential property and serves to break up the fabric of the neighborhood. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107343 2. Excessive Vacancy Approximately 9 percent (134 buildings) ofthe RPA's buildings were observed to be more than 50 percent vacant. There are several residential blocks that have vacant homes which are boarded up or have City notices on the doors. Coupled with the number of vacant lots within the RPA boundary, vacancy appears to be a chronic problem within the RPA. The presence of these vacant buildings shows disinvestment in the housing stock and also brings down the property values of surrounding occupied homes. 4. Redevelopment Plan & Project Redevelopment Needs of the West Woodlawn RPA The existing land use pattern and conditions in the West Woodlawn RPA suggest three redevelopment needs for the area: 1. Resources for commercial, residential, and mixed-use development and rehabilitation; 2. Infrastructure improvements, streetscaping, and buffering/screening between land uses; and 3. Property assembly, demolition, and site preparation. The Redevelopment Plan and Project identifies tools the City will use to guide redevelopment in the West Woodlawn RPA to create, promote, and sustain a vibrant mixed use community. The goals, objectives, and strategies discussed below have been developed to address these needs and to facilitate the sustainable redevelopment of the West Woodlawn RPA. The proposed public improvements outlined in the Redevelopment Plan and Project will help to create an environment conducive to private investment and redevelopment within the West Woodlawn RPA. To support specific projects and encourage future investment in the RPA, public resources, including tax increment financing, may be used to rehabilitate older buildings, improve, or repair RPA public facilities and/or infrastructure, and provide streetscape improvements! In addition, tax increment financing may be used to subsidize developer interest costs related to redevelopment projects. Goals, Objectives, and Strategies Goals, objectives, and strategies are designed to address the need for redevelopment within the overall framework of the Redevelopment Plan and Project for the use of anticipated tax increment funds generated within the West Woodlawn RPA. Goal. The overall goal ofthe Redevelopment Plan is to reduce or eliminate the conditions that qualify the West Woodlawn RPA as a conservation area, and to provide the mechanisms necessary to support public and private development and improvements in the RPA. This goal is to be achieved through an integrated and comprehensive strategy that leverages public resources to stimulate private investment in rehabilitation of existing structures and new development. Eliminating these conditions and facilitating development within the RPA will facilitate reestablishment ofthe RPA as a cohesive and vibrant mixed-use area that provides a broad range of both housing opportunities and commercial/retail uses, while accommodating public and institutional uses where appropriate. Redevelopment ofthe RPA will improve retail, commercial, and housing conditions; improve the relationship between the area's land uses; and attract private redevelopment. 107344 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Objectives. Eleven broad objectives support the overall goal of area-wide revitalization of the West Woodlavm RPA. These include: 1. Facilitate sustainable residential development and redevelopment that will accommodate current and future residents of the RPA, including a range of income levels and a variety of housing tenure (ownership versus rental); 2. Encourage high-quality retail development that promotes a lively pedestrian environment, incorporates enhanced plazas and green spaces, provides sufficient off-street parking, and adequately serves households residing in the area; 3. Improve the quality and quantity of existing open space, plazas, and streetscape elements to provide the community with safe, attractive public gathering spaces; 4. Promote new commercial and residential development and redevelopment that is "transit-oriented" in nature and reflects site design and mixes of uses that promote transit ridership and accessibility 5. Provide resources for the rehabilitation and modernization of existing structures and the reuse and rehabilitation of architecturally and historically significant structures, especially those identified as "orange" on the Chicago Historic Resources Survey; 6. Provide resources for creation and/or improvement of community facilities to provide health/wellness, education, social support, and job training opportunities for RPA residents; 7. Improve vehicular circulation throughout the RPA, through improvements to streets, alleys and loading areas; 8. Improve public transit facilities within the RPA, including encouragement of upgrades to Chicago Transit Authority properties and facilities; 9. Replace or repair public infrastructure where needed, including streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, underground water and sanitary systems, alleys, bridges, and viaducts; 10. Provide opportunities for women-owned, minority-owned, and locally-ovmed businesses to share in job opportunities associated with the redevelopment of the West Woodlavm RPA, particularly in the design and construction industries; and 11. Support job training and welfare to work programs and increase employment opportunities for City and neighborhood residents; Strategies. These objectives will be implemented through four specific and integrated strategies. These include: 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107345 1. Implement Public Improvements. A series of public improvements throughout the West Woodlawn RPA may be designed and implemented to build upon and improve the character of the area, and to create a more conducive environment for private development. Public improvements that are implemented with TIF assistance are intended to complement and not replace existing funding sources for public improvements in the RPA. These improvements may include improvement of new streets, streetscaping, street and sidewalk lighting, alleyways, underground water and sewer infrastructure, parks or open space, and other public improvements consistent with ' the Redevelopment Plan and Project. These public improvements may be completed pursuant to redevelopment agreements with private entities or intergovernmental agreements with other public entities, and may include the construction, rehabilitation, renovation, or restoration of public improvements on one or more parcels. 2. Encourage Private Sector Activities and Support Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. Through the creation and support of public-private partnerships, or through written agreements, the City may provide financial and other assistance to encourage the private sector, including local property owners, to undertake rehabilitation and redevelopment projects and other improvements, in addition to programming such as job training and retraining, that are consistent with the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. The City may enter into redevelopment agreements or intergovernmental agreements with private or public entities to construct, rehabilitate, renovate, or restore private or public improvements on one or several parcels (collectively referred to as "Redevelopment Projects"). The City requires that developers who receive TIF assistance for market-rate housing set aside twenty percent (20 percent) of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Community Development or any successor agency. Generally, this means that affordable for-sale' housing units should be priced at a level that is affordable to persons earning no more than one hundred percent (100 percent) of the area median income, and affordable rental units should be affordable to persons earning no more than sixty percent (60 percent) of the area median income. TIF funds can also be used to pay for up to fifty percent (50 percent) of the cost of construction or up to seventy five percent (75 percent) of interest costs for new housing units to be occupied by low-. income and very low-income households as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. 3. Develop Vacant and Underutilized Sites. The redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties within the West Woodlawn RPA is expected to stimulate private investment and increase the overall taxable value of properties within the RPA. Development of vacant and/or underutilized sites is anticipated to have a positive impact on other properties beyond the individual project sites. 4. Facilitate Property Assembly, Demolition, and Site Preparation. Financial assistance may be provided to private developers seeking to acquire land, and to assemble and prepare sites in order to undertake projects in support of this Redevelopment Plan and 107346 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Project. To meet the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, the City may acquire and assemble property throughout the RPA. Land assemblage by the City may be by purchase, exchange, donation, lease, eminent domain, through the Tax Reactivation Program, or other programs and may be for the purpose of (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers, or (b) sale, lease, conveyance, or dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Site preparation may include such preparatory work as demolition of existing improvements and environmental remediation, where appropriate. Furthermore, the City may require written redevelopment agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the City may devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and development. Proposed Future Land Use The proposed future land use of the West Woodlawn RPA reflects the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and Project, which are to provide resources for the rehabilitation of existing structures, facilitate diverse new residential and retail development, upgrade public infrastructure, enhance pedestrian and vehicular circulation, improve transit facilities, and enhance the quality of community and open space resources within the RPA. The proposed future land use for the RPA is a mixed-use (residential, retail/commercial, and public/institutional) district, as shown on Map 5. This proposed future land use is consistent with historical land use patterns and current redevelopment trends in and around the RPA, as well as the need to serve the community with modem facilities of the types noted above. The proposed future land use within the RPA includes a range of residential and retail/commercial uses; residential units above retail and commercial uses; and educational, civic, and institutional uses. The proposed future land uses shown on Map 5 are the predominant uses and are not exclusive of any other uses. The uses shown are for the purposes of guiding the Redevelopment Plan and do not supersede zoning. The proposed land uses described herein will be approved by the Chicago Plan Commission prior to its adoption by the City Council. Assessment of Housing Impact As set forth in the Act, if the redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project area would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited'residential units and a municipality is unable to certify that no displacement will occur, the municipality must prepare a Housing Impact Study and incorporate the study in the redevelopment project plan. The RPA contains an estimated 5,054 inhabited residential units. Since the redevelopment project area contains more than 75 units, a Housing Impact Study is required by the Act and was prepared by S. B. Friedman & Company. The results of the Housing Impact Study are described in a separate report which presents certain factual information required by the Act. The report is entitled "West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Housing Impact Study," and is attached as Appendix 3 to this Plan. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107347 5. Financial Plan Eligible Costs The various redevelopment expenditures that are eligible for payment or reimbursement under the Act are reviewed below. Following this review is a list of estimated redevelopment project costs that are deemed to be necessary to implement this Redevelopment Plan and Project (the "Redevelopment Project Costs"). Redevelopment Project Costs include the sum total of all reasonable or necessary costs incurred, estimated to be incurred, or incidental to this Plan pursuant to the Act. Such costs may include, without limitation, the following: 1. Costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and administration of the Redevelopment Plan and Project including but not limited to, staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other services (excluding lobbying expenses), provided that no charges for professional services are based on a percentage of the tax increment collected; 2. The costs of marketing sites within the RPA to prospective businesses, developers, and investors; 3. Property assembly costs, including but not limited to, acquisition of land and other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of buildings, site preparation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground-level or below-ground environmental contamination, including, but not limited to parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, and the clearing and grading of land; 4. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings, fixtures, and leasehold improvements, and the costs of replacing an existing public building if pursuant to the implementation of a redevelopment project the existing public building is to be demolished to use the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private investment; 5. Costs of the construction of public works or improvements subject to the limitations in Section 11 -74.4-3(q)(4) of the Act; 6. Costs of job training and retraining projects including the costs of "welfare to work" programs implemented by businesses located within the RPA and such proposals feature a community-based training program which ensures maximum reasonable opportunities for residents of the Loop Community Area with particular attention to the needs of those residents who have previously experienced inadequate employment opportunities and development of job-related skills including residents of public and other subsidized housing and people with disabilities; 107348 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 7. Financing costs, including but not limited to, all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued hereunder including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and for a period not exceeding 36 months following completion and including reasonable reserves related thereto; 8. To the extent the City, by written agreement, accepts and approves the same, all or a portion of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from the redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and Project; 9. Relocation costs to the extent that the City determines that relocation costs shall be paid or is required to make payment of relocation costs by federal or state law, or by Section 74.4-3(n)(7) ofthe Act; 10. Payment in lieu of taxes, as defined in the Act; 11. Costs of job training, retraining, advanced vocational education or career education, including but not limited to, courses in occupational, semi-technical, or technical fields leading directly to employment incurred by one or more taxing districts, provided that such costs; (i) are related to the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vocational education, or career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in the RPA; and (ii) when incurred by a taxing district or taxing districts other than the City, are set forth in a written agreement by or among the City and the taxing district or taxing districts, which agreement describes the program to be undertaken including but not limited to, the number of employees to be trained, a description of the training and services to be provided, the number and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program, sources of funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the payment by community college districts of costs pursuant to Sections 3-37, 3-38, 3-40, and 3-40.1 of the Public Community College Act, 110 ILCS 805/3-37, 805/3-38, 805/3-40 and 805/3-40.1, and by school districts of costs pursuant to Sections 10-22.20a and 10-23.3a ofthe School Code, 105 ILCS 5/10-22.20a and 5/10-23.3a; 12. Interest costs incurred by a redeveloper related to the construction, renovation, or rehabilitation of a redevelopment project provided that: a. Such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation fund established pursuant to the Act; b. Such payments in any one year may not exceed thirty percent (30%) ofthe aimual interest costs incurred by the redeveloper with regard to the development project during that year; 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107349 c. If there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax allocation fund to make the payment pursuant to this provision, then the amounts so due shall accrue and be payable when sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund; d. The total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total of (i) cost paid or incurred by the redeveloper for the redevelopment project; (ii) redevelopment project costs excluding any property assembly costs and any relocation costs incurred by the City pursuant to the Act; e. For the financing of rehabilitated or new housing for low-income households and very low-income households, as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act, the percentage of seventy-five percent (75%) shall be substituted for thirty percent (30%) in subparagraphs 12b and 12d above; 13. Unless explicitly provided in the Act, the cost of construction of new, privately owned buildings shall not be an eligible redevelopment project cost; 14. An elementary, secondary, or unit school district's increased costs attributable to assisted housing units will be reimbursed as provided in the Act; 15. Instead of the eligible costs provided for in 12b, 12d, and 12e above, the City may pay up to 50 percent of the cost of construction, renovation, and/or rehabilitation of all low- and very low-income housing units (for ownership or rental) as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. If the units are part of a residential redevelopment project that includes units not affordable to low- and very low-income households, only the low- and very low-income units shall be eligible for benefits under the Act; and 16. The costs of daycare services for children of employees from low-income families working for businesses located within the RPA and all or a portion of the cost of operation of day care centers established by RPA businesses to serve employees from low-income families working in businesses located in the RPA. For the purposes of this paragraph, "low-income families" means families whose annual income does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the City, county, or regional median income as determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. If a special service area has been established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act, 35 ILCS 235/0.01 et seg., then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act may be used within the RPA for the purposes permitted by the Special Service Area Tax Act, as well as the purposes permitted by the Act. Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs The estimated eligible costs that are deemed to be necessary to implement this Redevelopment Plan and Project are shown in Table 2. The total eligible cost provides an upper limit on expenditures that are to be funded using tax increment revenues, exclusive of capitalized interest, 107350 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 issuance costs, interest, and other financing costs. Within this limit, adjustments may be made in line items without amendment to this Plan, to the extent permitted by the Act. Additional funding in the form of State, Federal, County, or local grants, private developer contributions, and other outside sources may be pursued by the City as a means of financing improvements and facilities that are of benefit to the general community. Table 2: Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs Eligible ExpensesEstimated Project CostsProfessional Services (including analysis, administration, studies, surveys, legal, marketing, etc.)$800,000Property Assembly (including acquisition, site preparation, demolition, and environmental remediation)$8,000,000Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Fixtures, and Leasehold Improvements$15,000,000Eligible Construction Costs (includes Affordable Housing Construction Costs)$28,000,000Relocation Costs$2,000,000Public Works or Improvements (including streets and utilities, parks and open space, public facilities (schools & other public facilities)) (1)$11,500,000Job Training, Retraining, Welfare-to-Work$500,000Interest Costs$3,000,000Day Care Services$500,000TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT COSTS (2), (3), (4)$69,300,000(1) This category may also include paying Tor or reimbursing (i) an elemenlaiy, secondary, or unit school district's increased costs attributed to assisted housing units, and (ii) capital costs or taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the RPA. As permitted by the-Act, to the extent the City by written agreement accepts and approves the same, the City may pay, or reimburse all, or a portion of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from a redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance ofthe objectives ofthe Plan. (2) Total Redevelopment Project Costs exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense, capitalized interest, costs of issuance, and costs associated with optional redemptions. These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total Redevelopment Project Costs. (3) The amount of the Total Redevelopment Project Costs that can be incurred in the RPA will be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous RPAs, or those separated from the RPA only by a public right-of-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in the RPA, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs' incurred in the RPA which are paid from incremental properly taxes generated in contiguous RPAs or those separated from the RPA only by a public right-of-way. (4) Ail costs are in 2009 dollars and may be increased by five percent (5%) after adjusting for annual inflation reflected in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for All Items Tor the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, 1L-1N-WI CMSA, published by the U. S. Department of Labor. In addition to the above stated costs, each issue of obligations issued to f.nance a phase ofthe Redevelopment Plan and Project may include an amount of proceeds sufficient to pay customary and reasonable charges associated with the issuance of such obligations, including interest costs. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107351 Adjustments to the estimated line item costs in Table 2 are anticipated and may be made by the City without amendment to the Redevelopment Plan and Project to the extent permitted by the Act. Each individual project cost will be reevaluated in light of projected private development and resulting incremental tax revenues as it is considered for public financing under the provisions of the Act. The totals of line items set forth above are not intended to place a limit on the described expenditures. Adjustments may be made in line items within the total, either increasing or decreasing line item costs as a result of changed redevelopment costs and needs. In the event the Act is amended after the date of the approval of this Redevelopment Plan and Project by the City Council of Chicago to (a) include new eligible redevelopment project costs, or (b) expand the scope or increase the amount of existing eligible redevelopment project costs (such as, for example, by increasing the amount of incurred interest costs that may be paid under 65 ILCS 5/ll-74.4-3(q)(ll)), this Redevelopment Plan and Project shall be deemed to incorporate such additional, expanded, or increased eligible costs as eligible costs under the Redevelopment Plan and Project, to the extent permitted by the Act. In the event of such amendment(s), the City may add any new eligible redevelopment project costs as a line item in Table 3, or otherwise adjust the line items in Table 2 without amendment to this Redevelopment Plan and Project, to the extent permitted by the Act. In no instance, however, shall such additions or adjustments result in an increase of more than five percent after adjustment for inflation in the total redevelopment project costs without a further amendment to this Redevelopment Plan and Project. Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment Each private project within the West Woodlawn RPA shall be governed by the terms of a written redevelopment agreement entered into by a designated developer and the City and approved by the City Council. Where tax increment funds are used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs, to the extent funds are available for such purposes, expenditures by the City shall be coordinated to coincide on a reasonable basis with the actual redevelopment expenditures of the developer(s). The Redevelopment Plan and Project shall be completed, and all obligations issued to finance redevelopment costs shall be retired, no later than December 31^s1 of the year in which the payment to the City treasurer as provided in the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third year calendar year following the year in which the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Plan and Project is adopted (by December 31, 2034, if the ordinances establishing the RPA are adopted during 2010). Sources of Funds to Pay Costs Funds necessary to pay for Redevelopment Project Costs and secure municipal obligations issued for such costs are to be derived primarily from Incremental Property Taxes. Other sources of funds that may be used to pay for Redevelopment Project Costs or to secure municipal obligations include land disposition proceeds, state and federal grants, investment income, private financing, and other legally permissible funds the City may deem appropriate. The City may incur redevelopment project costs that are paid for from funds of the City other than 107352 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 incremental taxes, and the City may then be reimbursed for such costs from incremental taxes. Also, the City may permit the utilization of guarantees, deposits, and other forms of security made available by private sector developers. Additionally, the City may utilize revenues, other than State sales tax increment revenues, received under the Act from one redevelopment project area for eligible costs in another redevelopment project area that is either contiguous to, or is separated only by a public right-of-way from, the redevelopment project area from which the revenues are received. The West Woodlawn RPA is contiguous to the Woodlawn RPA. It may, in the future, be contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, other redevelopment areas created under the Act. The City may utilize net incremental property taxes received from the West Woodlawn RPA to pay eligible redevelopment project costs, or obligations issued to pay such costs, in contiguous redevelopment project areas or project areas separated only by a public right-of-way, and vice versa. The amount of revenue from the RPA, made available to support such contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs within the RPA, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in this Plan. The West Woodlawn RPA may become contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from, redevelopment project areas created under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law (65 ILCS 5/11-74.6-1, et sea,.). If the City finds that the goals, objectives, and financial success of such contiguous redevelopment project areas or those separated only by a public right-of-way are interdependent with those ofthe RPA, the City may determine that it is in the best interests ofthe City and the furtherance of the purposes of the Plan that net revenues from the RPA be made available to support any such redevelopment project areas, and vice versa. The City therefore proposes to utilize net incremental revenues received from the RPA to pay eligible redevelopment project costs (which are eligible .under the Industrial Jobs Recovery Law referred to above) in any such areas and vice versa. Such revenues may be transferred or loaned between the RPA and such areas. The amount of revenue from the RPA so made available, when added to all amounts used to pay eligible Redevelopment Project Costs within the RPA or other areas as described in the preceding paragraph, shall not at any time exceed the total Redevelopment Project Costs described in Table 2 of this Plan. If necessary, the redevelopment plans for other contiguous redevelopment project areas that may be or already have been created under the Act may be drafted or amended as applicable to add appropriate and parallel language to allow for sharing of revenues between such districts. Issuance of Obligations To finance project costs, the City may issue bonds or obligations secured by Incremental Property Taxes generated within the West Woodlawn RPA pursuant to Section 11-74.4-7 ofthe Act. To enhance the .security of a municipal obligation, the City may pledge its full faith and credit through the issuance of general obligations bonds. In addition, the City may provide other legally permissible credit enhancements to any obligations issued pursuant to the Act. 11/17/2010 r REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107353 All obligations issued by the City pursuant to this Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and the Act shall be retired within the timeframe described under "Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment" above. Also, the final maturity date of any such obligations that are issued may not be later than 20 years from their respective dates of issue. One or more of a series of obligations may be sold at one or more times in order to implement this Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan. Obligations may be issued on a parity or subordinated basis. In addition to paying Redevelopment Project Costs, Incremental Property Taxes may be used for the scheduled retirement of obligations, mandatory or optional redemptions, establishment of debt service reserves, and bond sinking funds. To the extent that Incremental Property Taxes are not needed for these purposes, and are not otherwise required, pledged, earmarked, or otherwise designated for the payment of Redevelopment Project Costs, any excess Incremental Property Taxes shall then become available for distribution annually to taxing districts having jurisdiction over the RPA in the manner provided by the Act. Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation of Properties in the Redevelopment Project Area The purpose of identifying the most recent equalized assessed valuation ("EAV") of the West Woodlawn RPA is to provide an estimate of the initial EAV that the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental EAV and incremental property taxes ofthe West Woodlawn RPA. The estimated 2008 EAV ofthe 2,284 parcels in the RPA is approximately $142,623,312. The 2008 EAV is based on the Assessor Certified Assessment multiplied by the 2008 Cook County Equalization Factor. This total EAV amount, by PIN, is summarized in Appendix 2. The EAV is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the final figure shall be certified by the Cook County Clerk, and shall become the Certified Initial EAV from which all incremental property taxes in the RPA will be calculated by Cook County. The Plan has utilized the Assessor Certified EAVs for the 2008 tax year; the figure is not Board Certified. If the Board Certified 2008 EAV shall become available prior to the date of the adoption of the Plan by the City Council, the City may update the Plan by replacing the Assessor Certified EAV with the Board Certified EAV. Anticipated Equalized Assessed Valuation By 2033, the EAV for the West Woodlawn RPA will be approximately $263,628,381. This estimate is based on several key assumptions, including: 1) an inflation factor of two-and-one-half percent (2.5 percent) per year on the EAV of all properties within the West Woodlawn RPA, with its cumulative impact occurring in each triennial reassessment year; 2) an equalization factor of 2.9058 (2008 equalizafion factor) throughout the life of the RPA; and 3) estimated increment generated from the redevelopment of one ofthe RPA's large housing complexes. 6. Required Findings and Tests Lack of Growth and Private Investment The City is required under the Act to evaluate whether or not the RPA has been subject to growth and private investment and must substantiate a finding of lack of such investment prior to establishing a tax increment financing district. To investigate a lack of growth and private 107354 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO' 11/17/2010 investment within the West Woodlawn RPA, S. B. Friedman & Company obtained and analyzed data for all building petvnits issued within the RPA between 2004 and 2009. This data was provided by the Department of Buildings. In addition, tax assessment data provided by the Cook County Assessor was analyzed for both the RPA and the City of Chicago. A review of building permit data indicates that 1,283 building permits were issued within the West Woodlawn RPA between January 2004 and July 2009. Of this number, 11 permits (0.8%) were issued for new construction and 49 permits (3.8%) were issued for substantial rehabilitation of existing buildings in the RPA. The remaining permits were issued for minor additions (e.g. porches), repairs, or to address a previous code violation. Over the Five years studied, new construction permits were issued for 11 primary structures, comprised of eight residential buildings (24 units), three retail structures, and one office building. The value of new construction and rehabilitation permits issued in the RPA during this time period totaled approximately $54 million. However, $45 million of the total value was assigned to one office building that is owned by the University of Chicago. The remaining permit value, $9 million, covers 10 development projects that primarily consist of smaller residential (three units or less) and retail properties. The $9 million in permit value accounts for less than three percent ofthe total assessor's market value for the RPA per year. This rate of investment is very low when compared to the overall value of private property within the RPA, which is currently estimated to exceed $306 million, based on assessments made by the Cook County Assessor. The most recent Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) of the RPA reflects the downward trend in housing values that has affected most of the general market. At its peak between 2005 and 2006, the EAV for the RPA increased nearly 50 percent. Market values during this time period, particularly for housing, skyrocketed and were overinfiated. This conclusion is further evidenced by the subsequent decrease in value two years later. The change in EAV between 2007 and 2008 was negative and it is anticipated that values will decline further in 2009. The table below displays the percentage change in EAV between 2003 and 2008. Table 3: Year to Year Percentage Change in EAV (2003-2008) 2003-20042004-20052005-20062006-20072007-2008West Woodlawn RPA-0.50%9.20%47.10%5.20%-0.90%Given the decline in EAV, limited new construction activity, and widespread vacancy present within the RPA (as discussed in the Eligibility Study section), it is likely that public intervention is necessary to correct and restore private development activity. Additionally, the extensive infrastructure needs of the West Woodlawn RPA, as well as. the high cost of rehabilitating structures that have become obsolescent, significantly deteriorated, or have fallen below current standards for new development, it is unlikely that the West Woodlawn RPA will see substantial private investment without public intervention such as that envisioned in this Redevelopment Plan and Project. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107355 Finding: The Redevelopment Project Area (West Woodlawn RPA) on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through significant investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be> anticipated to be developed without the adoption ofthe Redevelopment Plan and Project. Conformance to the Plans of the City The West Woodlawn Redevelopment Plan and Project must conform to the comprehensive plan for the City, conform to the strategic economic development plans, or include land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission. The proposed land uses described in this Redevelopment Plan and Project will be approved by the Chicago Plan Commission prior to its adoption by the City Council. Dates of Completion The dates of completion of the project and retirement of obligations are described under "Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment" in Section 5 above. Financial Impact of the Redevelopment Project As explained above, without the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and Project and tax increment financing, the West Woodlawn RPA is not expected to see substantial investment from private enterprise. As a result, there is a genuine threat that property values in the area will stagnate or decline. This would lead to a reduction of real estate tax revenue to all taxing districts. This document describes the comprehensive redevelopment program proposed to be undertaken by the City to create an environment in which private investment can reasonably occur. If a redevelopment project is successful, various new projects may be undertaken that will assist in alleviating blighting conditions, creating new jobs, and promoting both public and private development in the West Woodlawn RPA. This Redevelopment Plan and Project is expected to have short- and long-term financial impacts on the affected taxing districts. During the period when tax increment financing is utilized, real estate tax increment revenues from the increases in EAV over and above the certified initial EAV (established at the time of adoption of this document by the City) may be used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs for the West Woodlawn RPA. At the time when the West Woodlawn RPA is no longer in place under the Act, the real estate tax revenues resulting from the redevelopment ofthe West Woodlawn RPA will be distributed to all taxing districts levying taxes against property located in the West Woodlawn RPA. These revenues will then be available for use by the affected taxing districts. 107356 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Demand on Taxing District Services and Program to Address Financial and Service Impact In 1994, the Act was amended to require an assessment of any financial impact of a redevelopment project area on, or any increased demand for service from, any taxing district affected by the redevelopment plan, and a description of any program to address such financial impacts or increased demand. The City intends to monitor development in the West Woodlawn RPA and,, with the cooperation of the other affected taxing districts, will attempt to ensure that any increased needs are addressed in connection with any particular development. The following major taxing districts presently levy taxes on properties located within the West Woodlawn RPA and maintain the listed facilities within the boundaries of the RPA, or within close proximity to the RPA boundaries: 1. City of Chicago o E47 Fire Station, 432 E. Marquette Road o 3^rd District Police Station, 7040 S. Cottage Grove Avenue. 2. Chicago Board of Education a Sexton Elementary School, 6020 S. Langley Avenue o Fiske Elementary School, 6145 S. Ingleside Avenue o Till Elementary Math & Science Academy, 6543 S. Champlain Avenue » Dulles Elementary, 6311 S. Calumet Avenue 3. Chicago School Finance Authority 4. Chicago Park District o Washington Park, 5531 S. King Drive o Park No. 524, 6200 S. Drexel Avenue o Midway Plaisance, 5950 S. Woodlawn Avenue 5. Chicago Park District Aquarium and Museum Bonds 6. City of Chicago Library Fund » Bessie Coleman Library, 731 E. 63^rd Street 7. Chicago Community College District 508 8. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago 9. County of Cook 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107357 10. Cook County Forest Preserve District Map 6 illustrates the locations of community facilities operated by the above listed taxing districts within or in close proximity to the West Woodlawn RPA. Redevelopment activity may cause increased demand for services from one or more of the above listed taxing districts. The anticipated nature of the increased demand for services on these taxing districts, and the proposed activities to address increased demand, are described below. City of Chicago. The City is responsible for a wide range of municipal services including: police and fire protection; capital improvements and maintenance; water supply and distribution; sanitation service; and building, housing, arid zoning codes. Replacement of vacant and underutilized sites with active and more intensive uses may result in additional demands on services and facilities provided by the districts. Additional costs to the City for police, fire, and recycling and sanitation services arising front residential development may occur. However, it is expected that any increase in demand for the City services and programs associated with the West Woodlawn RPA can be handled adequately by City police, fire protection, sanitary collection and recycling services, and programs currently maintained and operated by the City. The redevelopment of the West Woodlawn RPA will not require expansion of services in this area. City of Chicago Library Fund. The Library Fund, supported primarily by property taxes, provides for the operation and maintenance of City of Chicago public libraries. Additional costs to the City for library services arising from residential development may occur. However, it is expected that any increase in demand for City library services and programs associated with the West Woodlawn RPA can be handled adequately by existing City library services. The redevelopment of the West Woodlawn RPA will not require expansion of services in this area. Chicago Board of Education and Associated Agencies. General responsibilities of the Board of Education include the provision, maintenance and operation of educational facilities and the provision of education services for kindergarten through twelfth grade. It is possible that some families who purchase housing or rent new apartments in the West Woodlawn RPA will send their children to public schools, putting increased demand on area school districts. However, it is unlikely that the scope of new residential construction would exhaust the existing capacity of public schools that serve residents of the RPA. Existing capacity was verified through data provided from the Department of School Demographics and Planning at the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). According to information from CPS, design capacity for a school is determined by counting the total number of classrooms and multiplying that number by 30. In elementary and middle schools, program capacity is calculated as 80% of the design capacity, allowing schools to use a percentage of classroom space for non-traditional learning spaces (e.g., art rooms, music rooms, computer rooms). In a high school, scheduling and more student/teacher mobility allow program capacity to be 100% of the design capacity. I 107358 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 Data obtained from CPS reveal that the elementary (PK-8) and high schools that include the West Woodlawn RPA in their respective catchment areas currently operate at the following capacities: School NameAddressSchool TypeInside/ Outside RPAEnrollmentEnrollment Design CapacityEnrollment as % of Design CapacitySexton Elementary School6020 S. Langley AvenueK-8Inside4231,17036.2%Fiske Elementary School6145 S. Ingleside AvenueK-8-Outside32570546.1%Till Elementary Math & Science Academy6543 S. Champlain AvenueK-8Inside6391,75536.4%Dulles Elementary School6311 S. Calumet AvenueK-8Outside4291,14037.6%Hyde Park Area High School6220 S. Stony Island9-12Outside1,9621,96287%All schools currently serving residents within the RPA have enrollments that are below their design capacity. Any increase in households with school aged children would likely not significantly impact the overall enrollment of these facilities. Additionally, increased costs to the local schools resulting from children residing in TIF-assisted housing units will trigger those provisions within the Act that provide for reimbursement to the affected school district(s) where eligible. The City intends to monitor development in the West Woodlawn RPA and, with the cooperation of the Board of Education, will attempt to ensure that any increased demands on the services and capital improvements provided by the Board of Education are addressed in connection with each new residential project. Chicago Park District. The Chicago Park District is responsible for the provision, maintenance, and operation of park and recreational facilities throughout the City, and for the provision of recreation programs. Community College District 508. This district is a unit ofthe State of Illinois' system of public community colleges, whose objective is to meet the educational needs of residents of the City and other students seeking higher education programs and services. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District. This district provides the main trunk lines for the collection of wastewater from Cities, Villages, and Towns, and for the treatment and disposal thereof It is expected that any increase in demand for treatment of sanitary and storm sewage associated with the West Woodlavm RPA can be handled adequately by existing treatment facilities maintained and operated by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107359 Therefore, no special program is proposed for the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. County of Cook. The County has principal responsibility for the protection of persons and property, the provision of public health services, and the maintenance of County highways. It is expected that any increase in demand for Cook County services can be handled adequately by existing services and programs maintained and operated by the County. Therefore, at this time, no special programs are proposed for this taxing district. Should demand increase, the City will work with the taxing district to determine what, if any, program is necessary to provide adequate services. _f Cook County Forest Preserve District. The Forest Preserve District is responsible for acquisition, restoration, and management of lands for the purpose of protecting and preserving open space in the City and County for the education, pleasure, and recreation ofthe public. It is expected that any increase in demand for Forest Preserve services can be handled adequately by existing facilities and programs maintained and operated by the District. No special programs are proposed for the Forest Preserve. Given the nature of the Redevelopment Plan and Project, specific fiscal impacts on the taxing districts and increases in demand for services provided by those districts cannot be wholly predicted within the scope of this plan. 7. Provisions for Amending Redevelopment Plan and Project This Redevelopment Plan and Project and Project document may be amended pursuant to the provisions ofthe Act. 8. Commitment to Fair Employment Practices and Affirmative Action Plan The City is committed to and will require developers to follow and affirmatively implement the following principles with respect to this Redevelopment Plan and Project. However, the City shall have the right in its sole discretion to exempt certain small businesses, residential property owners, and developers from the above. 107360 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 A. The assurance of equal opportunity in all personnel and employment actions with respect to this Redevelopment Plan and Project, including, but not limited to, hiring, training, transfer, promotion, discipline, fringe benefits, salary, employment working conditions, terminations, etc. without regard to race, color, sex, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, military dischatge status, source of income, or housing status. B. Meeting the City's standards for participation of twenty four percent (24%) Minority Business Enterprises and four percent (4%) Women Business Enterprises and the City Resident Construction Worker Employment Requirement as required in redevelopment agreements. C. The commitment to affirmative action and non-discrimination will ensure that all members of the protected groups are sought out to compete for all job openings and promotional opportunities. D. Redevelopers will meet City standards for any applicable prevailing wage rate as ascertained by the Illinois Department of Labor to all project employees. [Maps 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 5 and 6 and Appendix 2 referred to in this West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project printed on pages 107372 through 107406 of this Journal.] [Appendix 1 referred to in this West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project constitutes Exhibit "C" to ordinance and printed on pages 107432 through 107434 of this Journa/.] Appendix 3 referred to in this West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project reads as follows: 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107361 Appendix 3. (To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project) Housing /mpacf Study. Assessment of Housing Impact The purpose of this section is to conduct a Housing Impact Study for the West Woodlavm RPA as set forth in the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (the "Act") 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq., as amended. The Act requires that if the redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project area would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited residential units and the City is unable to certify that no displacement of residents will occur, the municipality shall prepare a Housing Impact Study and incorporate the study into the separate Feasibility Report required by subsection 1 l-74.4-5(a) of the Act, which for the purposes hereof shall also be the "West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project and Plan," or the "Redevelopment Plan." The primary goal of the Redevelopment Project and Plan is to provide the necessary mechanisms to re-establish the West Woodlawn RPA as a cohesive and vibrant mixed-use area that provides a comprehensive range of commercial and retail uses, as well as a diverse mix of housing types to current and future residents, while accommodating institutional uses where appropriate. Currently, there are no proposed Redevelopment Projects that will result in the displacement of any inhabited residential units. However, since the RPA contains more than 75 inhabited residential units and future redevelopment activity could conceivably result in the removal of inhabited residential units over the 23-year life of the RPA, a housing impact study is required. Under the provisions of the Act: Part I of the housing impact study shall include: (i) Data as to whether the residential units are single family or multi-family units; (ii) The number and type of rooms within the units, if that information is available; (iii) Whether the units are inhabited or uninhabited, as determined not less than 45 days before the date that the ordinance or resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 11-74.4-5 of the Act is passed; and (iv) Data as to the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units, which data requirement shall be deemed to be fully satisfied if based on data from the most recent federal Census. Part II of the housing impact study identifies the inhabited residential units in the proposed redevelopment project area that are to be, or may be, removed. If inhabited residential units are to be removed, then the housing impact study shall identify: (i) The number and location of those units that will be, or may be, removed; 107362 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 (ii) The municipality's plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the proposed redevelopment project area whose residences are to be removed; (iii) The availability of replacement housing for those residents whose residences are to be removed, and identification of the type, location, and cost of the replacement ^ housing; and (iv) The type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided. PARTI (i) Number and Type of Residential Units The number and type of residential buildings in the area were identified during the building condition and land use survey conducted as part of the eligibility analysis for the area. This survey, completed in July 2009, revealed that the West Woodlawn RPA contains 1,392 residential buildings containing 5,556 total dwelling units. The number of residential units by building type is described as follows: Building TypeTotal BuildingsTotal UnitsSingle-Family312315Multi-Family1,0805,241Total1,3925,556Source: S. B. Friedman & Company Note: On-campus residences for the University of Chicago were excluded from these total housing unit and type counts. (ii) Number and Type of Rooms within Units The distribution within the West Woodlawn RPA of the 5,556 residential units by number of rooms and by number of bedrooms is identified in tables within this section. The methodology to determine this information is described below. Methodology In order to describe the distribution of residential units by number and type of rooms within the West Woodlawn RPA, S. B. Friedman & Company analyzed 2000 Census data by Block Groups for those Block Groups encompassed by the Redevelopment Project Area. A Block Group is a combination of Census blocks, and is the lowest level of geography for which the Census Bureau tabulates sample, or long-form, data. In this study, we have relied on 2000 US Census sample data because it is the best available information regarding the structures and residents of the Redevelopment Project Area. These Block Group data show the distribution of housing units by the number of bedrooms and the total number of rooms within each unit. We then applied the 2000 distribution percentage to the total number of units identified by the survey. The estimated distribution of units by bedroom type and number of rooms are described as follows: 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107363 Units by Bedroom Type'Number of Bedrooms2000 CensusCurrent Estimate for RPAStudio8%4451 Bedroom19%1,0792 Bedrooms36%1,9803 Bedrooms30%1,6674 Bedrooms5%2685+ Bedrooms2%117Total100%5,556Source: 2000 U.S. Census Units by Number of Rooms²Number of Rooms2000 CensusCurrent Estimate for RPA1 Room4%2092 Rooms5%3013 Rooms15%8294 Rooms19%1,0465 Rooms30%1,6566 Rooms15%8587 Rooms6%3558 Rooms1%50 9+ Rooms5%252Total100%5,556Source: 2000 U.S. Census As defined by the Census Bureau, Number of Bedrooms includes all rooms intended for use as bedrooms even if they are currently used for some other purpose. A Housing Unit consisting of only one room, such as a one-room efficiency apartment, is classified, by definition, as having no bedroom. ² As defined by the Census Bureau, for each unit, rooms include living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished recreation rooms, enclosed porches suitable for year-round use, and lodger's rooms. Excluded are strip or Pullman kitchens, bathrooms, open porches, balconies, halls or foyers, half-rooms, utility rooms, unfinished attics or basements, or other unfinished space used for storage. A partially divided room is a separate room only if there is a partition from floor to ceiling, but not if the partition consists solely of shelves or cabinets.' 107364 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 (iii) Number of Inhabited Units According to data compiled from the survey completed by S. B. Friedman & Company in July 2009, the West Woodlavm RPA contains an estimated 5,556 residential units of which 502 units (or 9%) are estimated to be vacant. Therefore, there are approximately 5,054 total inhabited units within the redevelopment area. As required by the Act, this information was ascertained as of July 2009, which is a date not less than 45 days prior to the date that the resolution or ordinance required by Subsection 11-74.4-5 (a) of the Act was, or will be, passed (the resolution or ordinance setting the public hearing and Joint Review Board meeting dates). (iv) Race and Ethnicity of Residents ( As required by the Act, the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units was determined. According to U.S. Census data, the average household size within the Block Groups which comprise the West Woodlawn RPA was 2.65 persons in 2009. Therefore, there are an estimated 13,393 residents living within the proposed boundaries. The race and ethnic composition of these residents is as follows: RaceEstimated Residents (2009)PercentageBlack or African-American Alone13,01797.2%White Alone1571.2%Asian Alone670.5%American Indian or Alaska Native Alone180.1%Some other race Alone370.3%Two other races970.7%Total13,393100%Source: 2000 U.S. Census Hispanic OriginEstimated Residents (2009)PercentageHispanic1150.9% .Non-Hispanic13,27899.1%Total13,393100%Source: 2000 U.S. Census We have also estimated the potential distribution by income of the households living in the inhabited units within the West Woodlavm RPA. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107365 In order to estimate the number of moderate-, low-, very low-, and very, very low-income households in the RPA, S. B. Friedman & Company used data from Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), a national demographic and income data provider. As determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the definitions of the above-mentioned income categories, adjusted for family size, are as follows: (i) A very, very low-income household has an adjusted income of less than 30% of the area median income. (ii) A very low-income household earns between 30% and 50% of the area median income. (iii) A low-income household earns between 50% and 80% of the area median. (iv) A moderate-income household earns between 80% and 120% of the area median. ESRI estimates that of all households residing within the Block Groups encompassed by the West Woodlawn RPA, 61% may be classified as very low-income or lower, 20% may be classified as low-income, and 12% may be classified as moderate-income households. Households By Income CategoryIncome Category2009 Percentage (from ESRI)Number of HouseholdsAnnual Income Range (Average HH of 3 Persons)Very, Very Low Income48%2,438$0 -$20,370Very Low-Income13%67320,371 - $33,950Low-Income20%988$33,951 -$54,250Moderate-Income12%628$54,251 -$85,480Subtotal: Moderate-Income or Below94%4,727SO - $85,480Above Moderate-Income6%327$81,481 +Total100%5,054--Source: HUD, ESRI, and S. B. Friedman & Co. PART II (i) Number and Location of Units to be Removed There are currently plans to replace one of the larger housing developments in the RPA with new affordable housing. Grove Pare Plaza will be redeveloped to include 419 units of affordable, moderate, and market-rate housing. The Preservation of Affordable Housing (POAH), the developer for the project, contends that no permanent displacement will occur. As of July 2009, 107366 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010 359 of Grove Pare Plaza's 504 units were occupied. Tenants residing in Grove Pare at the start of construction will be relocated to temporary units until the construction of their unit is complete. Beyond the Grove Pare redevelopment project, there are no other proposed Redevelopment Projects that will result in the displacement of any inhabited residential units. Therefore, it is impossible to determine the exact extent to which future projects receiving tax increment assistance (or other public projects implemented in furtherance of the Redevelopment Plan) will bring about the permanent removal of residences. However, it is probable that some existing units may be removed as a result of redevelopment activity over the 23-year life of the RPA. In order to meet the statutory requirement of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed, a methodology was established that would provide a rough, yet reasonable, estimate. This methodology is described below. Methodology The methodology used to fulfill the statutory requirements of defining the number and location of inhabited residential units that may be removed involves three steps: (i) Step one counts all inhabited residential units identified on any acquisition lists or maps. No pre-existing acquisition lists or maps were identified, nor has an acquisition list been included in the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project and Plan. We therefore assume that no inhabited residential units are likely to be removed due to demolition or rehabilitation of dilapidated buildings. (ii) Step two counts the number of inhabited residential units located on parcels that are dilapidated as defined by the Act. A survey of the entire RPA completed in July 2009 identified no dilapidated buildings. We therefore assume that no inhabited residential units are likely to be removed due to demolition or rehabilitation of dilapidated buildings. (iii) Step three counts the number of inhabited residential units that exist where the future land use indicated by the Redevelopment Plan will not include residential uses. After reviewing the Proposed Future Land Use for the West Woodlawn RPA, we determined that there will be no units impacted by changes to the existing land use. Therefore, the number of inhabited residential units that may be removed due to future land use change is zero. We have identified all of the inhabited units that meet the criteria described above in order to arrive at a reasonable projection of the total number of inhabited residential units that may be removed as a result of redevelopment projects that are undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. Though our analysis above suggests that no inhabited residential units are likely to be removed, it is uncertain whether any such units will actually be removed as a result of projects within the RPA. Based on the income distributions in and around the RPA, it is reasonable to assume that approximately 94% of households that may be displaced during the life of the RPA are of moderate, low, very low, or very, very low income. However, it is possible that a higher percentage, up to 100%, of potentially displaced households lie within these income brackets. Part II, subpart (iii) of this section discusses in detail the availability of replacement housing for households of low income or lower. 11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107367 (ii) Relocation Plan The City's plan for relocation assistance for those qualified residents in the West Woodlawn RPA whose residences may be removed shall be consistent with the requirements set forth in Section 11 -74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act. The terms and conditions of such assistance are described in subpart (iv) below. No specific relocation plan has been prepared by the City as of this date; until such a redevelopment project is approved, there is no certainty that any removal of residences will actually occur. (iii) Replacement Housing In accordance with Subsection 11 -74.4-3(n)(7) of the Act, the City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that affordable replacement housing located in or near the West Woodlawn RPA is available for any qualified displaced residents. To promote development of affordable housing, the Redevelopment Plan requires that developers who receive tax increment financing assistance for market-rate housing are to set aside at least 20 percent of the units to meet affordability criteria established by the City's Department of Housing. Generally, this means that income-restricted rental units should be affordable to households earning no more than 60 percent of the area median income (adjusted for family size). If, during the 23-year life of the West Woodlavm RPA, the acquisition plans change, the City shall make every effort to ensure that appropriate replacement housing will be found in the Redevelopment Project Area or the surrounding Woodlawn Community Area. In order to determine the availability of replacement housing for those residents who may potentially be displaced by redevelopment activity, S. B. Friedman & Company examined several data sources, including vacancy data from the 2000 U.S. Census, apartment listings from local newspapers, and housing sales data from Multiple Listing Service. Vacancy Data According to the 2000 Census, the 13 Block Groups surrounding and encompassing the West Woodlawn RPA contained 7,277 housing units, of which 925 (13%) were vacant. For the purposes of this analysis, the term "RPA Vicinity" refers to these Block Groups. The following table shows the distribution of vacant residential units in the RPA by vacancy status, as compared to the City of Chicago as a whole. Vacancy StatusVacancy Rate by Vacancy Status Share of all Housing Units (RPA Vicinity)Citvwide PercentageFor rent	8.8%	3.4%
For sale	0.5%	0.8%
Rented/sold but not occupied	1.3%	0.9%
For seasonal/recreational/occasional use/migrant	0.1%	0.5%
Other	2.1%	3.0%
TOTAL VACANT UNITS	13.0%	8.6%

107368

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

The percentage of residential units that are vacant and awaiting rental in the RPA Vicinity is more than twice that of the City of Chicago (8.8% vs. 3.4%), suggesting the potential that a relatively large supply of replacement rental housing exists in the RPA Vicinity. The percentage of ownership housing units that are vacant and awaiting sale in the RPA Vicinity is comparable to that of the city as a whole, while the overall rate of residential vacancy in the RPA is nearly twice that of the city.

Replacement Rental Housing

According to information obtained from the City of Chicago by S. B. Friedman & Company, there are no current projects located within the West Woodlawn RPA that will result in a loss of permanent housing units. However, the possibility remains that some existing units may be removed in the future as a result of redevelopment activity over the 23-year life of the RPA. Therefore, our firm has defined a sample of possible replacement rental housing units located within the Woodlawn Community Area.

The location, type, and cost of this sample were determined through the examination of classified advertisements from the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun Times during the month of August 2009. It is important to note that the Chicago metro-area has a rental cycle where apartments turn over at a greater rate on May 1 and October 1 of each year. These higher turnover times would likely reflect a wider variety of rental rates, unit sizes, and locations than those available in the months surveyed for this study.

The range of maximum affordable monthly rents, according to HUD standards, is shown in the following table in comparison with the advertised rents found in the above-mentioned newspaper listings.

		Maximum Monthly Rent (Including Utilities) Affordable to Income Bracket
Number of Bedrooms	Implied Family Size*	Very, Very Low	Very Low	Low	Moderate	Observed Range**	Units in Sample
Studio	1	$396	$660	$1,055	$1,583	$636-$903	3
1	1.5	$424	$707	$1,131	$1,697	$417-$ 1,046	7
2	3	$509	$848	$1,357	$2,036	$706-$l,578	17
3	4.5	$588	$980	$1,568	$2,352	$1,145-52,009	12
4	6	$656	$1,093	$1,749	$2,624	$1,218-$1,523	2
5	7.5	$724	$1,206	$1,930	$2,895	$2,133	1
6	9	$792	$1,320	$2,111	$3,167	n/a	0
Total							42

Source: HUD, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun-Times, S. B. Friedman & Company *Derived from the number of bedrooms using HUD formulas. **Based on a random sample of apartments located in the Woodlawn Community Area and advertised in the Chicago Tribune and Sun Times during the month of August 2009.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107369

The table on the following page provides a detailed summary of the apartment listings found in the Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun Times during the month of December. Since HUD affordability standards state that monthly rent, including utilities, should equal no more than 30% of gross household income, S. B. Friedman & Company has adjusted the monthly rents listed below to include utility payments using Section 8 utility cost estimates for various apartment unit sizes developed by the Chicago Housing Authority.

West Woodlawn RPA

Survey of Apartwent Listings within the Vicinty ofthe West Woodlawn RPA

Ref.#	Street Address	ZIP	Bedrooms	Adjusted Rent	Source
1	6126 S. Woodlawn	60637	0	$636	Chicago craigslist
2	6104 S. Woodlawn	60637	0	$756	apartments.com
3	5550 S. Dorchester	60637	0	$903	apartments.com
4	64th & Ingleside	60637	I	$417	Chicago Sun-Times
5	1016 E. 62nd Street	60637	1	$696	Chicago craigslist
6	6126 S. Woodlawn	60637	1	$771	Chicago craigslist
7	6430 S. Stony Island	60637	1	$825	apartments.com
8	6140 S. Drexel Avenue	60637	1	$846	apartments.com
9	6104 S. Woodlawn	60637	1	$1,017	aparhnents.com
10	5550 S. Dorchester	60637	1	$1,046	apartments.com
11	65th & Eberhart	60637	2	$706	Chicago Sun-Times
12	300 E. 68th Street	60637	2	$806	apartments.com
13	6623 S. Vemon	60637	2	$873	apartments.com
14	6123 S.Michigan	60637	2	$881	apartments.com
15	113 W. 57th Street	60637	2	$881	apartments.com
16	6139 S.Champlain	60637	2	$881	apartments.com
17	923 E. Marquette Rd.	60637	2	$903	Chicago craigslist
18	6446 S. Kenwood	60637	2	$928	Chicago craigslist
19	6138 S. Woodlawn	60637	2	$928	Chicago craigslist
20	6138 S. Woodlawn	60637	2	$928	Chicago craigslist
21	6219 S. University	60637	2	$978	Chicago craigslist
22	6611-13 S. Marquette Road	60637	2	$981	apartments.com
23	6430 S. Stony Island	60637	2	$1,001	apartments.com
24	6140 S. Drexel Avenue	60637	2	$1,003	apartments.com
25	5550 S. Dorchester	60637	2	$1,298	apartments.com
26	6431 S. Drexel	60637	2	$1,478	Chicago Sun-Times
27	6431 S. Drexel	60637	2	$1,578	Chicago Sun-Times
28	6550-52 S. University Ave.	60637	3	$1,145	apartments.com
29	6140 S. Drexel Avenue	60637	3	$1,159	apartments.com
30	63rd & Drexel	60637	3	$1,170	apartments.com
31	6430 S. Stony Island	60637	3	$1,181	apantments.com
32	6547 S. Drexel	60637	3	$1,184	Chicago Sun-Times
33	1424 E. 65th Place	60637	3	$1,295	apartments.com
34	1424 E. 65th Place	60637	3	$1,409	Chicago Sun-Times
35	900 East 62nd Street	60637	3	$1,709	Chicago Sun-Times
36	6128 S. Kimbark	60637	3	$1,709	Chicago Sun-Times
37	6424 S. Dorchester	60637	3	$1,809	Chicago Sun-Times
38	6147 S. University	60637	3	$1,909	Chicago Craig's List
39	6433 S. Drexel	60637	3	$2,009	Chicago Sun-Times
40	6607 S. Drexel Avenue	60637	4	$1,218	Chicago Sun-Times
41	6140 S. Drexel Avenue	60637	4	$1,523	apartments.com
42	1112 East 62nd Street	60637	5	$2,133	Chicago Sun-Times

107370

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

The table indicates that the apartment listings generally reflect the mix of unit sizes (as measured by the number of bedrooms) cited from the 2000 Census, although units with fewer than two bedrooms are less prevalent in the sample collected by SBFCo. In this sample (summarized above), approximately 24% of available rental units have less than two bedrooms, while the 2000 Census indicates approximately 27% of residential units in the RPA Vicinity have that number of bedrooms. The sample also suggests that the RPA may contain relatively few non-income-restricted units affordable to very, very low-income households.

S. B. Friedman & Company has also researched the availability of subsidized and income-restricted housing in and near the West Woodlawn RPA. According to data provided by the Illinois Housing Development Authority (IHDA), there are at least 1,290 units in IHDA properties in the Woodlawn Community Area. Of this total, all are income-restricted units, including an estimated 63 unit of project-based Section 8 housing. In Section 8 housing, qualifying households are required to pay 30% of their income as monthly rent, with the Section 8 subsidy making up the difference between that amount and the contract rent. Additionally, as noted in the preceding table, several of apartments in the vicinity of the West Woodlawn RPA are eligible for tenants with Section 8 vouchers.

Replacement For-Sale Housing

In order to determine the availability of replacement for-sale housing for those home owners who may potentially be displaced, S. B. Friedman & Company reviewed data available from the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) of Northern Illinois which lists most of the currently active for-sale properties in the Northern Illinois region, as well as historical data listing housing sales within the region over the past three years. The following table describes housing sales for detached and attached (condominium and town home) residential units within the Woodlawn Community Area for the past three years, as well as all current available properties listed for sale.

Price Ranee	2007 Sales	2008 Sales	2009 Sales (through July 2009)	Currently Active Properties * (as of July 2009)
$0-5100,000	21	32	59	37
$100,000-5150,000	20	11	7	22
$150,000-$200,000	67	23	17	34
$200,000- $250,000	63	22	8	27
$250,000 & Above	56	24	8	32
Totals	227	112	99	152

Source: Multiple Listing Service of Northern Illinois, S. B. Friedman & Company

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107371

Based on the available data, we anticipate that the rental and for-sale residential markets for the Community Areas in and around West Woodlawn RPA should be adeouate to furnish needed replacement housing for those residents that may potentially be displaced because of redevelopment activity within the RPA. There are no planned redevelopment projects that will reduce the number of residential units within the RPA, and those types of mixed-use projects which might be proposed in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan may include new - residential units. Therefore, it is assumed that any displacement caused by activities as part of the Redevelopment Plan could potentially occur simultaneously with the development of new housing, either rental or for-sale. As a result, there could potentially be a net gain of residential units within the RPA. Furthermore, it is likely that any displacement of units would occur incrementally over the 23-year life ofthe RPA as individual development projects are initiated.

(iv) Relocation Assistance

In the event that the implementation of the Plan results in the removal of residential housing units in the Project Area occupied by low-income households or very low-income households, or the displacement of low-income households or very low-income households from such residential housing units, such households shall be provided affordable housing and relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and the regulations hereunder, including the eligibility criteria. Affordable housing may be either existing or newly constructed housing. The City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that this affordable housing is located in or near the Project Area.

As used in the above paragraph, "low-income households," "very low-income households," and "affordable housing" have the meanings set forth in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act, 310 ILCS' 65/3 et seq., as amended. As of the date of this study, these statutory terms are defined as follows:

(i) "Low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 50% but less than 80% ofthe median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such adjusted income and median income are determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") for purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937;

(ii) "Very low-income household" means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is not more than 50% of the median income ofthe area of residence, adjusted for family size, as so determined by HUD; and

(iii) "Affordable housing" means residential housing that, so long as the same is occupied by low-income households or very low-income households, requires payment of monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, of no more than 30% of the maximum allowable income for such households, as applicable.

The Citv of Chicago will make a eood faith effort to relocate these households to affordable housing located in or near the West Woodlawn RPA and will provide relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Policies Act of 1970.

107372

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Map 1.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Community Confexf.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107373

Map 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

i RPA Boundary.

107374

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

. Map 3.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Existing Land-Use.

Legend

'■U* ¹ ^B ^We!l Woodlawn l! RPA Boundary

:::: Commercial

1^*3 RcsifJtnlial

(5<^> Mixed: Commercial and Residential

__Industrial

SS^SS Public/lnttllunonDj t&88£$l Vacunl Lot ^U Railroad/RiBlil df-Wny Historic Buildings

-JI_I_I

City of Chicago

West Woodlawn

Tax Increment Finance District

December 2009

11/17/2010 REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 107375

Map 4A

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Eligibility Factor,- Age (35+ Years).

*■ ■. >----wthplI [

City of Chicago

West Woodlawn

Tax Increment Finance District

December 2009

r& A Frlttman A Copt/Mny

107376

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Map 4B.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Eligibility Factor - Deterioration.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107377

Map 4C.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Eligibility Factor- Inadequate Utilities.

107378

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Map 4D.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Eligibility Factor - Structures Below Minimum Code.

City of Chicago

West Woodlawn

Tax Increment Finance Dislrict

December 2009

jFS.B. Frleiman A Company

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107379

Map 4E.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Eligibility Factor - Lack Of Community Planning.

107380

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Map 5.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Proposed Future Land-Cse.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107381

Map 6.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Community Facilities.

107382

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 1 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1	20-14-301-001-0000		$25,080		$72,877
2	20-14-301-002-0000		$0		$0
3	20-14-301-003-0000		$0		$0
4	20-14-301-008-0000		$0		$0
5\	20-14-301-024-0000		$4,938		$14,349
6	20-14-301-026-0000		$0		$0
7	20-14-301-027-0000		$78,805		$228,992
8	20-14-307-001-0000		$31,427		$91,321
9	20-14-307-002-0000		$61,833		$179,674
10	20-14-307-007-0000		$13,662		$39,699
II	20-14-307-008-0000		$27,324		$79,398
12	20-14-307-016-0000		$230,624		$670,147
13	20-14-307-018-0000		$107,968		$313,733
14	20-14-307-019-0000		$96,993		$281,842
15	20-14-307-020-0000		$13,426		$39,013
16	20-15-401-001-0000		$0		$0
17	20-15-401-002-0000		$27,018		$78,509
18	20-15-401-003-0000		$16,669		$48,437
19	20-15-401-004-0000		$4,977		$14,462
20	20-15-401-005-0000		$31,389		$91,210
21	20-15-401-006-0000		$40,576		$117,906
22	20-15-401-007-0000		$5,775		$16,781
23	20-15-401-010-0000		$0		$0
24	20-15-401-011-0000		$0		$0
25	20-15-401-012-0000		$5,813		$16,891
26	20-15-401-014-0000		$41,803		$121,471
27	20-15-401-015-0000		$13,882		$40,338
28	20-15-401-016-0000		$10,780		$31,325
29	20-15-401-017-0000		$9,026		$26,228
30	20-15-401-018-0000		$34,111		$99,120
31	20-15-401-019-0000		$18,658		$54,216
32	20-15-401-020-0000		$17,784		$51,677
33	20-15-401-021-0000		$15,775		$45,839
34	20-15-401-022-0000		$17,680		$51,375
35	20-15-401-023-0000		$40,707		$118,286
36	20-15-401-024-0000		$0		$0
37	20-15-401-025-0000		$0		$0
38	20-15-401-026-0000		$42,445		$123,337
39	20-15-401-027-0000		$24,797		$72,055
40	20-15-401-028-0000		$3,109		$9,034
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
41		20-15-401-029-0000		$19,029		$55,294
42		20-15-401-030-1001		$2,721		$7,907
43		20-15-401-030-1002		$2,721		$7,907
44		20-15-401-030-1003		.$2,706		$7,863
45		20-15-401-030-1004		$2,721		$7,907
46		20-15-401-030-1005		$2,721		$7,907
47		20-15-401-030-1006		$2,706		$7,863
48		20-15-401-031-1001		$26,554		$77,161
49		20-15-401-031-1002		$27,027		$78,535
50		20-15-401-031-1003		$14,920		$43,355
51		20-15-401-031-1004		. $15,505		$45,054
52		20-15-401-031-1005		$14,840		$43,122
53		20-15-401-031-1006		$15,268'		$44,366
54		20-15-401-032-1001		$16,028		$46,574
55		20-15-401-032-1002		$16,316		$47,411
56		20-15-401-032-1003		$16,316		$47,411
57		20-15-401-032-1004		$16,316		$47,411
58		20-15-401-032-1005		$16,316		$47,411
59		20-15.-401-032-1006		$16,316		$47,411
60		20-15-401-032-1007		$1,027		$2,984
61		20-15-401-032-1008		$1,027		$2,984
62		20-15-401-032-1009		$1,027		$2,984
63'		20-15-401-032-1010		$1,027		$2,984
64		20-15-401-032-1011		$1,027		$2,984
65		20-15-402-002-0000		$30,515		$88,670
66		20-15-402-004-0000		$4,812		$13,983
67		20-15-402-005-0000		$2,406		$6,991
68		20-15-402-006-0000		$0		$0
69		20-15-402-007-0000		$2,406		$6,991
70		20-15-402-008-0000		$42,668		$123,985
71		20-15-402-009-0000		$22,940		$66,659
72		20-15-402-010-0000		$25,411		$73,839
73		20-15-402-0 U-0000		$2,406		$6,991
74		20-15-402-012-0000		$24,885		$72,311
75		20-15-402-013-0000		$0		$0
76		20-15-402-014-0000		$24,605		$71,497
77		20-15-402-015-0000		$26,918		$78,218
78		20-15-402-016-0000		$52,591		$152,819
79		20-15-402-017-0000		$1,749		$5,082
80		20-15-402-018-0000		$31,315		$90,995

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107383

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 2 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
81	20-15-402-019-0000		$43,968		$127,762
82	20-15-402-020-0000		$35,575		$103,374
83	20-15-402-021-0000		$27,309		$79,354
84	20-15-402-022-0000		$4,812		$13,983
85	2O-I5-4O2-023-O00O		$2,406		$6,991
86	20-15-402-024-0000		$2,406		$6,991
87	20-15-402-025-0000		$47,129		$136,947
88	20-15-402-026-0000		$37,151		$107,953
89	20-15-402-027-0000		$28,500		$82,815
90	20-15-402-028-0000		$38,086		$110,670
91	20-15-402-029-0000		$618,209		$1,796,392
92	20-15-403-001-0000		$28,835		$83,789
93	20-15-403-002-0000		$25,326		$73,592
94	20-15-403-003-0000		$0		$0
95	20-15-403-004-0000		$49,018		$142,437
96	20-15-403-005-0000		$45,619		$132,560
97	20-15-403-007-0000		$4,851		$14,096
98	20-15-403-008-0000		$1,554		$4,516
99	20-15-403-009-0000		$23,378		$67,932
100	20-15-403-010-0000		$17,844		$51,851
101	20-15-403-011-0000		£16,945		$49,239
102	20-15-403-012-0000		$8,208		$23,851
103	20-15-403-013-0000		$16,537		$48,053
104	20-15-403-014-0000		$16,527		$48,024
105	20-15-403-015-0000		$17,169		$49,890
106	20-15-403-016-0000		$28,589		$83,074
107	20-15-403-017-0000		$0		$0
108	20-15-403-018-0000		$25,808		$74,993
109	20-15-403-021-0000		$17,660		$51,316
110	20-15-403-022-0000		$45,600		$132,504
III	20-15-403-024-0000		$25,885		$75,217
112	20-15-403-025-0000		$27,616		$80,247
113	20-15-403-026-0000		$0		$0
114	20-15-403-027-0000		$1,705		$4,954
115	20-15-403-028-0000		$24,886		$72,314
116	20-15-403-029-0000		$1,705		$4,954
117	20-15-403-030-0000		$25,675		$74,606
118	20-15-403-031-0000		$33,471		$97,260
119	20-15-403-032-0000		$25,164		$73,122
120	2O-I5-4O3-033-O0OO		$8,021		$23,307
121	20-15-403-034-0000		$29,001		$84,271
122	20-15-403-035-0000		$36,195		$105,175
123	20-15-403-036-1001		$11,549		$33,559
124	20-15-403-036-1002		$11,549		$33,559
125	20-15-403-036-1003		$11,549		$33,559
126	20-15-403-036-1004		$11,549		$33,559
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
127		20-15-403-036-1005		$10,143		$29,474
128		20-15-403-036-1006		$10,143		$29,474
129		20-15-403-036-1007		$1,676		$4,870
130		20-15-403-036-1008		$1,676		$4,870
131		20-15-403-036-1009		$1,676		$4,870
132		20-15-403-036-1010		$1,676		$4,870
133		20-15-403-037-1001		$24,793		$72,043
134		20-15-403-037-1002		$28,175		$81,871
135		20-15-403-037-1003		$28,499		$82,812
136		2O-I5-4O3-037-1OO4		$30,429		$88,421
137		20-15-403-038-1001		$17,677		$51,366
138		20-15-403-038-1002		$26,266		$76,324
139		20-15-403-038-1003		$25,758		$74,848
140		20-15-403-038-1004		$26,266		$76,324
141		20-15-404-001-0000		$0		$0
142		20-15-404-002-0000		$23,765		$69,056
143		20-15-404-004-0000		$25,536		$74,203
144		20-15-404-006-0000		$0		$0
145		20-15-404-007-0000		$0		$0
146		20-15-404-008-0000		$0		$0
147		20-15-404-009-0000		$2,278		$6,619
148		20-15-404-010-0000		$25,578		$74,325
149		20-15-404-011-0000		$25,529		$74,182
150'		20-15-404-012-0000		$23,399		f $67,993
151		20-15-404-013-0000		$29,091		$84,533
152		20-15-404-014-0000		$29,430		$85,5)8
153		20-15-404-015-0000		$28,458		$82,693
154		20-15-404-016-0000		$1,535		$4,460
155		20-15-404-017-0000		$32,593		$94,709
156		20-15-404-018-0000		$32,855		$95,470
157		20-15-404-019-0000		$31,668		$92,021
158		20-15-404-020-0000		$26,576		$77,225
159		20-15-404-021-0000		$29,549		$85,863
160		20-15-404-022-0000		$0		$0
161		20-I5-404-O24-O0OO		$29,949		$87,026
162		20-15-404-025-0000		$30,585		$88,874
163		20-15-404-026-0000		SO		$0
164		20-15-404-029-0000		$2,242		$6,515
165		20-15-404-030-0000		$28,414		$82,565
166		20-15-404-031-0000		$26,964		$78,352
167		20-15-404-032-0000		$0		$0
168		20-15-404-034-0000		$13,431		$39,028
169		20-15-404-035-0000		$8,250		$23,973
170		20-15-404-036-1001		$5,586		$16,232
171		20-15-404-036-1002		$5,595		$16,258
172		20-15-404-036-1003		$5,595		$16,258

107384

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 3 of 25)

No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV	2008 Proposed EAV
173		20-15-404-036-1004	$5,595	$16,258
174		20-15-404-036-1005	$4,982	$14,477
175		20-15-404-036-1006	$4,991	$14,503
176		20-15-404-036-1007	$4,991	$14,503
177		20-15-404-036-1008	$4,991	$14,503
178		20-15-404-036-1009	$5,356	$15,563
179		20-15-404-036-1010	$5,356	$15,563
180		20-15-404-036-1011	$5,356	$15,563
181		20-15-404-036-1012	$4,084	$11,867
182		20-15-404-036-1013	$4,084	$11,867
183		20-15-404-036-1014	$4,084	$11,867
184		20-15-404-036-1015	$2,939	$8,540
185		20-15-404-036-1016	$2,939	$8,540
186		20-15-404-036-1017	$2,939	$8,540
187		20-15-404-037-1001	$22,819	$66,307
188		20-15-404-037-1002	$15,973	$46,414
189		20-15-404-037-1003	$16,499	$47,943
190		20-15-404-038-1001	$36,679	$106,582
191		20-15-404-038-1002	$27,509	$79,936
192		20-15-404-038-1003	$27,509	$79,936
193		20-15-405-001-0000	$86,959	$252,685
194		20-15-405-002-0000	$32,000	$92,986
195		20-15-405-003-0000	$44,547	$129,445
196		20-15-405-004-0000	$39,633	$115,166
197		20-15-405-005-0000	$29,197	$84,841
198		20-15-405-006-0000	$31,524	$91,602
199		20-15-405-007-0000	$0	$0
200		20-15-405-008-0000	$34,076	$99,018
201		20-15-405-009-0000	$52,799	$153,423
202		20-15-405-011-0000	$32,458	$94,316
203		20-15-405-012-0000	$31,563	$91,716
204		20-15-405-015-0000	$44,800	$130,180
205		20-15-405-016-0000	$29,599	$86,009
206		20-15-405-017-0000	$30,314	$88,086
207		20-15-405-018-0000	$27,120	$78,805
208		20-15-405-019-0000	$26,070	$75,754
209		20-15-405-020-0000	$26,051	$75,699
210		20-15-405-021-0000	$18,023	$52,371
211		20-15-405-022-0000	$0	$0
212		20-15-405-023-0000	$14,504	$42,146
213		20-15-405-024-0000	$0	$0
214		20-15-405-025-0000	$33,312	$96,798
215		20-15-405-027-0000	$64,376	$187,064
216		20-15-405-028-0000	$6,352	$18,458
217		20-15-405-029-0000	,$0	$0
218		20-15-405-031-1001	$16,984	$49,352
No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
219	20-15-405-031-1002		$19,511		$56,695
220	20-15-405-031-1003		$20,020		$58,174
221	20-15-405-031-1004		$20,545		$59,700
222	20-15-405-031-1005		$16,984		$49,352
223	20-15-405-031-1006		$19,511		$56,695
224	20-15-405-031-1007		$20,020		$58,174
225	20-15-405-031-1008		$20,545		$59,700
226	20-15-405-032-1001		$14,883		$43,247
227	20-15-405-032-1002		$19,365		$56,271
228	20-15-405-032-1003		$19,365		$56,271
229	20-15-405-032-1004		$19,365		$56,271
230	20-15-405-032-1005		$17,317		$50,320
231	20-15-405-032-1006		. $19,365		$56,271
232	20-15-405-032-1007		$19,365		$56,271
233	20-15-405-032-1008		$19,365		$56,271
234	20-15-405-033-1001		$38,002		$110,426
235	20-15-405-033-1002		$28,501		$82,818
236	20-15-405-033-1003		$28,501		$82,818
237	20-15-406-001-0000		$0		$0
238	20-15-406-002-0000		$0		$0
239	20-15-406-003-0000		$0		$0
240	20-15-406-004-0000		$29,394		$85,413
241	20-15-406-005-0000		$43,835		$127,376
242	20-15-406-006-0000		$1,512		$4,394
243	20-15-406-007-0000		$0		$0
244	20-15-406-008-0000		$24,629		$71,567
245	20-15-406-009-0000		$42,663		$123,970
246	20-15-406-010-0000		$4,273		$12,416
. 247	20-15-406-019-0000		$0		$0
248	20-15-406-020-0000		$0		$0
249	20-15-406-021-0000		$0		$0
250	20-15-407-013-0000		$20,689		$60,118
251	20-15-407-014-0000		$0		$0
252	20-15-407-021-0000		$0		$0
253	20-15-407-022-0000		$1,416,665		$4,116,545
254	20-15-407-023-0000		$0		$0
255	20-15-408-001-0000		$58,394		$169,681
256	20-15-408-002-0000		$42,455		$123,366
257	20-15-408-003-0000		$3,799		$11,039
258	20-15-408-004-0000		$4,812		$13,983
259	20-15-408-005-0000		$41,744		$121,300
260	20-15-408-006-0000		$0		$0
261	20-15-408-008-0000		$0		$0
262	20-15-408-009-0000		$41,802		$121,468
263	20-15-408-010-0000		$94,897		$275,752
264	20-15-408-011-0000		$69,834		$202,924

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107385

Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 4 of 25)

No.	PIN			2008 Proposed AV	2008 Proposed EAV
265	20-15-408-013-0000			$33,736	$98,030
266	20-15-408-014-0000			$27,237	$79,145
267	20-15-408-015-0000			$26,648	$77,434
268	20-15-408-016-0000			$27,477	$79,843
269	20-15-408-017-0000			$30,677	$89,141
270	20-15-408-018-0000			$29,963	$87,066
271	20-15-408-019-0000			$2,887	$8,389
272	20-15-408-021-0000			$44,042	$127,977
273	20-15-408-022-0000			$0	$0
274	20-15-408-023-0000			$31,972	$92,904
275	20-15-408-024-0000			$25,529	$74,182
276	20-15-408-025-0000			$27,184	$78,991
277	20-15-408-026-0000			$31,251	$90,809
278	20-15-408-027-1001			$17,549	$50,994
279	20-15-408-027-1002			$17,549	$50,994
280	20-15-408-027-1003			$17,549	$50,994'
28I	20-15-408-027-1004			$16,465	$47,844
282	20-15-408-027-1005			$17,549	$50,994
283	20-15-408-027-1006			$17,549	$50,994
284	20-,'5-408-028-1001			$18,999	$55,207
285	20-15-408-028-1002			$18,999	$55,207
286	20-15-408-029-0000			$42,510	$123,526
287	20-15-408-030-0000			$42,510	$123,526
288	20-15-409-001-0000			$0	$0
289	20-15-409-002-0000			$23,795	$69,144
290	20-15-409-003-0000			$23,032	$66,926
291	20-15-409-004-0000			$24,723	$71,840
292	20-15-409-005-0000			$29,067	$84,463
293	20-15-409-006-0000			$30,069	$87,375
294	20-15-409-007-0000			$26,172	$76,051
295	20-15-409-008-0000			$27,767	$80,685
296	20-15-409-009-0000			$31,351	$91,100
297	20-15-409-010-0000			$29,384	$85,384
298	20-15-409-011-0000			$24,897	$72,346
299	20-15-409-014-0000			$26,797	$77,867
300	20-15-409-015-0000			$62,385	$181,278
301	20-15-409-016-0000			$121,612	$353,380
302	20-15-409-017-0000			$34,282	$99,617
303	20-15-409-018-0000			$27,937	$81,179
304	20-15-409-019-0000			$26,512	$77,039
305	20-15-409-020-0000			$33.011	$95,923
306	20-15-409-021-0000			$29,373	$85,352
307	20-15-409-022-0000			$27,272	$79,247
308	20-15-409-024-0000			$31,510	$91,562
309	20-15-409-025-0000			$33,103	$96,191
310	20-15-409-026-0000			$29,790	$86,564
No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV			2008 Proposed EAV
311		20-15-409-027-0000	$43,418			$126,164
312		20-15-409-028-0000	$26,468			$76,911
313		20-15-409-029-0000	$24,164			$70,216
314		20-15-409-031-1001	$17,680			$51,375
315		20-15-409-031-1002	$25,125			$73,008
316		20-15-409-031-1003	$25,125			$73,008
317		20-15-409-031-1004	$25,125			$73,008
318		20-15-409-032-1001	$29,330			$85,227
319		20-15-409-032-1002	$30,263			$87,938
320		20-15-409-032-1003	$22,196			$64,497
321		20-15-409-032-1004	$23,128			$67,205
322		20-15-409-032-1005	$24,605			$71,497
323		20-15-409-032-1006	$25,911			$75,292
324		20-15-409-033-1001	$44,896			$130,459
325		20-15-409-033-1002	$28,269			$82,144
326		20-15-409-033-1003	$27,571			$80,116
327		20-15-409-033-1004	$27,521			$79,971
328		20-15-409-033-1005	$27,547			$80,046
329		20-15-409-033-1006	$27,571			$80,116
330		20-15-409-034-1001	$25,4S9			$73,979
331		20-15-409-034-1002	$19,468			$56,570
.332		2O-I5-409-O34-IO03	$23,076			$67,054
333		20-15-409-034-1004	$23,318			$67,757
334		20-15-409-034-1005	$23,076			$67,054
335		20-15-409-034-1006	$23,318			$67,757
336		20-15-409-034-1007	$23,076			$67,054
337		20-15-409-034-1008	$23,318			$67,757
338		20-15-409-034-1009	$30,388			$88,301
339		20-15-409-034-1010	$28,103			$81,662
340		20-15-409-034-1011	$23,979			$69,678
341		20-15-409-034-1012	$28,103			$81,662
342		20-15-409-034-1013	$23,979			$69,678
343		20-15-409-034-1014	$28,103			$81,662
344		20-15-409-034-1015	$23,979			$69,678
345		20-15-409-034-1016	$34,372			$99,878
346		20-15-409-034-1017	$36,433			$105,867
347		20-15-409-034-1018	$24,950			$72,500
348		20-15-409-034-1019	$29,970			$87,087
349		20-15-409-034-1020	$24,950			$72,500
350		20-15-409-034-1021	$29,970			$87,087
351		20-15-409-034-1022	$24,950			$72,500
352		20-15-409-034-1023	$29,970			$87,087
353		20-15-410-001-0000	$42,142			$122,456
354		20-15-410-002-0000	$25,700			$74,679
355		20-15-410-003-0000	$27,052			$78,608
356		20-15-410-004-0000	$41,380			... $120,242

107386

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

/Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)'

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 5 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
357	20-15-410-005-0000		$35,000		$101,703
358	20-15-410-007-0000		$40,900		$118,847
359	20-15-410-008-0000		$23,520		$68,344
360	20-15-410-009-0000		$24,220		$70,378
36]	20-15-410-010-0000		$23,297		$67,696
362	20-15-410-011-0000		$24,630		$71,570
363	20-15-410-012-0000		$29,677		$86,235
364	20-15-410-013-0000		$37,729		$109,633
365	20-15-410-014-0000		$5,337		$15,508
366	20-15-410-015-0000		$33,478		$97,280
367	20-15-410-016-0000		$31,257		$90,827
368	20-15-410-017-0000		$27,740		$80,607
369	20-15-410-018-0000		$26,302		$76,428
370	20-15-410-019-0000		$25,868		$75,167
371	20-15-410-020-0000		$27,069		$78,657
372	20-15-410-021-0000		$0		$0
373	20-15-410-022-0000		$28,978		$84,204
374	20-15-410-024-0000		$28,660		$83,280
375	20-15-410-025-0000		$30,512		$88,662
376	20-15-410-026-0000		$28,727		$83,475
377	20-15-410-027-0000		$29,628		$86,093
378	20-15-410-028-0000		$25,027		$72,723
379	20-15-410-029-0000		$27,702		$80,496
380	20-15-410-030-0000		$24,707		$71,794
381	20-15-410-031-0000		$26,594		$77,277
382	20-15-410-032-1001		$12,412		$36,067
383	20-15-410-032-1002		$12,412		$36,067
384	20-15-410-032-1003		$11,418		$33,178
385	20-15-410-032-1004		$11,418		$33,178
386	20-15-410-032-1005		$11,919		$34,634
387	20-15-410-032-1006		$11,919		$34,634
388	20-15-410-033-1001		$26,745		$77,716
389	20-15-410-033-1002		$26,745		$77,716
390	20-15-410-033-1003		$26,745		$77,716
391	20-15-411-001-0000		$5,515		$16,025
392	20-15-411-002-0000		$30,772		$89,417
393	20-15-411-003-0000		$0		$0
394	20-15-411-004-0000		$24,156		$70,193
395	20-15-411-005-0000		$24,030		$69,826
396	20-15-411-006-0000		$26,679		$77,524
397	20-15-411-007-0000		$31,055		$90,240
398	20-15-411-008-0000		$25,443		$73,932
399	20-15-411-009-0000		$25,106		$72,953
400	20-15-411-010-0000		$25,940		$75,376
401	20-15-411-011-0000		$27,297		$79,320
402	20-15-411-012-0000		$27,668		$80,398
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
403		20-15-411-013-0000		$28,174		$81,868
404		20-15-411-014-0000		$26,833		$77,971
405		20-15-411-015-0000		$26,787		$77,838
406		20-15-411-016-0000		$24,937		$72,462
407		20-15-411-017-0000		$25,646		$74,522
408		20-15-411-018-0000		$0		$0
409		20-15-411-019-0000		$16,493		$47,925
410		20-15-411-020-0000		$30,946		$89,923
411		20-15-411-021-0000		$36,643		$106,477
412		20-15-411-022-0000		$35,355		$102,735
413		20-15-411-024-0000		$26,893		$78,146
414		20-15-411-025-0000		$26,837		$77,983
415		20-15-411-026-0000		$26,287		$76,385
416		20-15-411-027-0000		$25,875		$75,188
417		20-15-411-028-0000		$27,180		$78,980
418		20-15-411-029-0000		$25,786		$74,929
419		20-15-411-030-0000		$25,553		$74,252
420		20-15-411-031-0000		$31,467		$91,437
421		20-15-411-032-0000		$21,167		$61,507
422		20-15-411-035-0000		$2,795		$8,122
423		20-15-411-036-0000		$0		$0
424		20-15-411-037-1001		$22,817		$66,302
425		20-15-411-037-1002		$22,818		$66,305
426		20-15-411-037-1003		$22,817		$66,302
427		20-15-412-001-0000		$0		$0
428		20-15-412-002-0000		$46,686		$135,660
429		20-15-412-003-0000		$30,284		$87,999
430		20-15-412-004-0000		$25,333		$73,613
431		20-15-412-005-0000		$34,503		$100,259
432		20-15-412-006-0000		$20,000		$58,116
433		20-15-412-007-0000		$25,487		$74,060
434		20-15-412-008-0000		$30,853		$89,653
435		20-15-412-009-0000		$2,818		$8,189
436		20-15-412-010-0000		$26,149		$75,984
437		20-15-412-01 1-0000.		$26,495		$76,989
438		20-15-412-012-0000		$26,014		$75,591
439		20-15-412-013-0000		$22,257		$64,674
440		20-15-412-014-0000		$25,348		$73,656
441		20-15-412-015-0000		$32,937		$95,708
442		20-15-412-016-0000		$105,279		$305,920
443		20-15-412-017-0000		$27,780		$80,723
444		20-15-412-018-0000		$25,131		$73,026
445		20-15-412-019-0000		$24,966		$72,546
446		20-15-412-020-0000		$24,282		$70,559
447		20-15-412-021-0000		$28,756		$83,559
448		20-15-412-022-0000		$29,510		$85,750

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107387

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 6 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
449	20-15-412-023-0000		$25,213		$73,264
450	20-15-412-024-0000		$25,485		$74,054
451	20-15-412-025-0000		$24,257		$70,486
452	20-15-412-026-0000		$24,480		$71,134
453	20-15-412-027-0000		$24,441		$71,021
454	20-15-412-028-0000		$27,891		$81,046
■ 455	20-15-412-029-0000		$18,152		$52,746
456	20-15-412-030-0000		$25,169		$73,136
457	20-15-412-031-0000		$23,924		$69,518
458	20-15-412-032-0000		$0		$0
459	20-15-413-001-0000		$60,285		$175,176
460	20-15-413-002-0000		$20,486		$59,528
461	20-15-413-003-0000		$24,060		$69,914
462	20-15-413-004-0000		$23,480		$68,228
463	20-15-413-005-0000		$28,013		$81,400
464	20-15-413-007-0000		$29,956		$87,046
465	20-15-413-008-0000		$25,321		$73,578
466	20-15-413-009-0000		$25,870		$75,173
467	20-15-413-010-0000		$29,317		$85,189
468	20-15-413-011-0000		$15,833		$46,008
469	20-15-413-012-0000		$26,110		$75,870
470	20-15-413-013-0000		$23,918		$69,501
471	20-15-413-014-0000		$28,994		$84,251
472	20-15-413-015-0000		$24,436		$71,006
473	20-15-413-016-0000		$24,249		$70,463
474	20-15-413-017-0000		$0		$0
475	20-15-413-018-0000		$7,822		$22,729
476	20-15-413-019-0000		$0		$0
477	20-15-413-020-0000		$20,863		$60,624
478	20-15-413-021-0000		$22,841		$66,371
479	20-15-413-022-0000		$13,419		$38,993
480	20-15-413-023-0000		$24,702		$71,779
481	20-15-413-024-0000		$28,534		$82,914
482	20-15-413-025-0000		$27,447		$79,755
483	20-15-413-026-0000		$27,089		$78,715
484	20-15-413-027-0000		$0		$0
485	20-15-413-028-0000		$24,303		$70,620
486	20-15-413-029-0000		$24,304		$70,623
487	20-15-413-030-0000		$24,304		$70,623
488	20-15-413-031-0000		$24,163		$70,213
489	20-15-413-032-0000		$25,078		$72,872
490	20-15-413-033-0000		$68,121		$197,946
491	20-15-413-034-1001		$15,985		$46,449
492	20-15-413-034-1002		$25,239		$73,339
493	20-15-413-034-1003		$19,890		$57,796
494	20-15-414-001-0000		$115,456		$335,492
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
495		20-15-414-002-0000		$23,639		$68,690
496		20-15-414-003-0000		$25,669		$74,589
497		20-15-414-004-0000		$36,885		$107,180
498		20 15-414-005-0000		$38,877		$112,969
499		20-15-414-006-0000		$24,840		$72,180
500		20-15-414-007-0000		$23,502		$68,292
501		20-15-414-008-0000		$17,141		$49,808
502		20-15-414-009-0000		$24,217		$70,370
503		20-15-414-010-0000		$0		$0
504		20-15-414-011-0000		$25,643		$74,513
505		20-15-414-012-0000		^N$I7,664		$51,328
506		20-15-414-013-0000		$26,883		$78,117
507		20-15-414-014-0000		$42,064		$122,230
508		20-15-414-015-0000		$27,691		$80,465
509		20-15-414-016-0000		$0		■ $0
510		20-15-414-017-0000		$68,206		$198,193
511		20-15-414-018-0000		$26,931		$78,256
512		20-15-414-019-0000		$24,268		$70,518
513		20-15-414-020-0000		$25,512		$74,133
514		20-15-414-021-0000		$26,388		$76,678
515		20-15-414-022-0000		$24,774		$71,988
516		20-15-414-023-0000		$25,657		$74,554
517		20-15-414-024-0000		$29,862		$86,773
518		20-15-414-025-0000		$29,489'		$85,689
519		20-15-414-026-0000		$0		$0
520		20-15-414-027-0000		$24,747		$71,910
521		20-15-414-028-0000		$24,697		$71,765
522		20-15-414-029-0000		$23,071		$67,040
523		20-15-414-030-0000		$33,693		$97,905
524		20-15-414-031-0000		$6,285		$18,263
525		20-15-414-032-0000		$16,803		$48,826
526		20-15-414-034-0000		$4,059		$11,795
527		20-15-414-035-1001		$13,699		$39,807
528		20-15-414-035-1002		$13,699		$39,807
529		20-15-414-035-1003		$13,699		$39,807
530		20-15-414-035-1004		$13,699		$39,807
531		20-15-414-035-1005		$13,699		$39,807
532		20-15-414-035-1006		$13,699		$39,807
533		20-15-415-001-0000		$47,301		$137,447
534		20-15-415-002-0000		$26,066		$75,743
535		20-15-415-003-0000		$26,147		$75,978
536		20-15-415-004-0000		$27,235		$79,139
537		20-15-415-005-0000		$27,546		$80,043
538		20-15-415-006-0000		$26,914		$78,207
539		20-15-415-007-0000		$30,465		$88,525
540		20-15-415-008-0000		' $25,199		$73_;223

107388

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 7 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
541	20-15-415-009-0000		$25,076		$72,866
542	20-15-415-010-0000		$25,669		$74,589
543	20-15-415-012-0000		$26,329		$76,507
544	20-15-415-013-0000		$30,728		$89,289
545	20-15-415-014-0000		$31,522		$91,597
546	20-15-415-015-0000		$25,096		$72,924
547	20-15-415-016-0000		$28,448		$82,664
548	20-15-415-031-0000		$238,242		$692,284
549	20-15-415-032-1001		$2,427		$7,052
550	20-15-415-032-1002		$2,416		$7,020
551	20-15-415-032-1003		$2,416		$7,020
552	20-15-415-032-1004		$2,664		$7,741
553	20-15-415-032-1005		$2,950		$8,572
554	20-15-415-032-1006		$2,950		$8,572
555	20-15-415-032-1007		$2,424		$7,044
556	20-15-415-032-1008		$2,424		$7,044
557	20-15-415-032-1009		$2,424		$7,044
558	20-15-415-032-1010		$2,451		$7,122
559	20-15-415-032-1011		$2,451		$7,122
560	20-15-415-032-1012		$2,451		$7,122
561	20-15-415-033-1001		$1,708		$4,963
562	20-15-415-033-1002		$1,929		$5,605
563	20-15-415-033-1003		$1,708		$4,963
564	20-15-416-002-0000		$42,841		$124,487
565	20-15-416-003-0000		$41,775		$121,390
566	20-15-416-004-0000		$42,353		$123,069
567	20-15-416-005-0000		$42,246		$122,758
568	20-15-416-006-0000		$45,697		$132,786
569	20-15-416-007-0000		$43,940		$127,681
570	20-15-416-008-0000		$17,232		$50,073
571	20-15-416-009-0000		$40,442		$117,516
572	20-15-416-010-0000		$1,960		$5,695
573	20-15-416-011-0000		$27,112		$78,782
574	20-15-416-012-0000		$22,724		$66,031
575	20-15-416-013-0000		$25,748		$74,819
576	20-15-416-014-0000		$25,445		$73,938
577	20-15-416-015-0000		$26,731		$77,675
578	20-15-416-016-0000		$26,939		$78,279
579	20-15-416-017-0000		$27,148		$78,887
580	20-15-416-018-0000		$26,731		$77,675
581	20-15-416-019-0000		$26,782		$77,823
582	20-15-416-020-0000		$0		$0
583	20-15-416-021-0000		$44,804		$130,191
584	20-15-416-022-0000		$60,190		$174,900
585	20-15-416-023-0000		$30,866		$89,690
586	20-15-416-024-0000		$0		$0
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
587		20-15-416-025-0000		$0		$0
588		20-15-416-026-0000		$0		$0
589		20-15-416-027-1001		$28,324		$82,304
590		20-15-416-027-1002		$20,831		$60,531
591		20-15-416-027-1003		$17,924		$52,084
592		20-15-416-027-1004		$14,156		$41,135
593		20-15-416-027-1005		$16,894		$49,091
594		20-15-416-027-1006		$17,680		$51,375
595		20-15-416-027-1007		$20,831		$60,531
596		20-15-416-027-1008		$20,831		$60,531
597		20-15-416-027-1009		$31,174		$90,585
598		20-15-416-027-1010		$21,850		$63,492
599		20-15-416-027-1011		$20,831		$60,531
600		20-15-416-027-1012		$14,156		$41,135
601		20-15-417-001-0000		$0		$0
602		20-15-417-003-0000		$49,299		$143,253
603		20-15-417-004-0000		$0		$0
604		20-15-417-007-0000		$9,936		. $28,872
605		20-15-417-008-0000		$42,750		$124,223
606		20-15-417-009-0000		$143,634		$417,372
607		20-15-417-010-0000		$33,531		$97,434
608		20-15-417-011-0000		$0		$0
609		20-15-417-012-0000		$2,864		$8,322
610		20-15-417-013-0000		$28,500		$82,815
611		20-15-417-016-0000		$0		$0
612		20-15-417-017-0000		$0		$0
613		20-15-417-018-0000		$6,187		$17,978
614		20-IS-417-019-0000		$6,187		$17,978
615		20-15-417-020-0000		$6,187		$17,978
616		20-IS-417-021-0000		$8,015		$23,290
617		20-15-417-022-0000		$24,283		$70,562
618		20-15-417-023-0000		$25,507		$74,118
619		20-15-417-024-0000		$51,752		$150,381
620		20-15-417-027-1001		$2,847		$8,273
621		20-15-417-027-1002		$2,847		$8,273
622		20-15-417-027-1003		$2,847		$8,273
623		20-15-417-027-1004		$1,109		$3,223
624		20-15-417-027-1005		. $2,847		$8,273
625		20-15-417-027-1006		$2,847		$8,273
626		20-15-417-027-1007		$2,847		$8,273
627		20-15-417-027-1008		$24,531		$71,282
628		20-15-417-027-1009		$2,847		$8,273
629		20-15-417-027-1010		$8,382		$24,356
630		20-15-417-027-1011		$2,871		$8,343
631		20-15-417-027-1012		$5,726		$16,639
632		20-15-417-027-1013		$2,847		$8,273

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107389

Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 8 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
633	20-15-417-027-1014		$2,847		$8,273
634	20-15-417-027-1015		$5,890		$17,115
635	20-15-417-027-1016		$4,522		$13,140
636	20-15-417-027-1017		$2,847		$8,273
637	20-15-417-027-1018		$24,414		$70,942
638	20-15-417-027-1019		$8,167		$23,732
639	20-15-417-027-1020		$24,074		$69,954
640	20-15-417-027-1021		$2,847		$8,273
641	20-15-417-027-1022		$24,414		$70,942
642	20-15-417-027-1023		$8,382		$24,356
643	20-15-417-027-1024		$2,875		$8,354
644	20-15-418-001-0000		$33,051		$96,040
645	20-15-418-002-0000		$44,532		$129,401
646	2O-I5-4I8-003-OOOO		$25,428		$73,889
647	20-15-418-004-0000		$27,394		$79,601
648	20-I5-4I8-0O5-OOOO		$25,552		$74,249
649	20-15-418-006-0000		$25,539		$74,211
650	20-15-418-007-0000		$25,331		$73,607
651	20-15-418-008-0000		$25,155		$73,095
652	2O-I5-4I8-009-OOOO		$26,053		$75,705
653	20-15-418-010-0000		$26,061		$75,728
654	20-15-418-011-0000		$25,121		$72,997
655	20-15-418-012-0000		$25,077		$72,869
656	20-15-418-013-0000		$26,171		$76,048
657	20-15-418-014-0000		$26,571		$77,210
658	20-15-418-015-0000		$21,229		$61,687
659	20-15-418-016-0000		$28,062		$81,543
660	20-15-418-017-0000		$27,637		$80,308
661	20-15-418-018-0000		$25,182		$73,174
662	20-I5-4I8-OI9-OOO0		$24,092		$70,007
663	20-15-418-020-0000		$25,252		$73,377
664	20-15-418-021-0000		$25,015		$72,689
665	20-15-418-022-0000		$25,378		$73,743
666	20-15-418-023-0000		$27,155		$78,907
667	2O-I5-4I8-024-O00O		$22,236		$64,613
668	20-15-4I8-025-OOO0		$26,863		$78,059
669	20-15-418-026-0000		$26,488		$76,969
670	20-15-418-027-0000		$25,965		$75,449
671	20-I5-4I8-028-0OOO		$28,231		$82,034
672	20-15-418-032-0000		$22,425		$65,163
673	2O-15-4I8-033-OOO0		$0		$0
674	20-15-419-001-0000		$46,251		$134,396
675	20-15-419-002-0000		$26,878		$78,102
676	20-15-419-003-0000		$29,004		$84,280
677	20-15-419-004-0000		$24,444		$71,029
678	20-15-419-005-0000		$26,091		$75,815
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
679		20-15-419-006-0000		$47,263		$137,337
680		20-15-419-007-0000		$27,282		$79,276
681		20-15-419-008-0000		$0		$0
682		20-15-419-009-0000		$37,500		$108,968
683		20-15-419-010-0000		$24,695		$71,759
684		20-15-419-011-0000		$24,194		$70,303
685		20-15-419-012-0000		$24,912		$72,389
686		20-15-419-013-0000		$30,563		$88,810
687		20-15-419-014-0000		$74,483		$216,433
688		20-15-419-015-0000		$2,938		$8,537
689		20-15-419-016-0000		$23,999		$69,736
690		20-15-419-017-0000		$30,716		$89,255
691		20-15-419-018-0000		$25,884		$75,214
692		20-15-419-019-0000		$23,372		$67,914
693		20-15-419-020-0000		$26,111		$75,873
694		20-15-419-021-0000		$26,599		$77,291
695		20-15-419-022-0000		$26,683		$77,535
696		20-15-419-023-0000		$44,305		$128,741
697		20-15-419-024-0000		$49,939		$145,113
698		20-15-419-025-0000		$30,687		$89,170
699		20-15-419-026-0000		$41,487		$120,553
700		20-15-419-027-0000		$0		$0
701		20-15-419-028-0000		$0		$0
702		20-15-4I9-O29-OOOO		$0		$0
703		20-15-419-030-0000		$101,050		$293,631
704		20-15-420-001-0000		$0		$0
705		20-15-420-002-0000		$27,186		$78,997
706		20-15-420-003-0000		$2,348		$6,823
707		20-15-420-004-0000		$26,579		$77,233
708		20-15-420-005-0000		$25,642		$74,511
709		20-15-420-006-0000		$23,777		$69,091
710		20-15-420-007-0000		$23,777		$69,091
711		20-15-420-008-0000		$2,348		$6,823
712		20-15-420-009-0000		$2,348		$6,823
713		20-15-420-010-0000		$26,362		$76,603
714		20-15-420-011-0000		$27,963		$81,255
715		20-15-420-012-0000		$17,606		$51,160
716		20-15-420-013-0000		$27,882		$81,020
717		20-15-420-014-0000		$24,762		$71,953
718		20-15-420-016-0000		$25,394		$73,790
719		20-15-420-017-0000		$24,855		$72,224
720		20-15-420-018-0000		$22,523		$65,447
721		20-15-420-020-0000		$26,403		$76,722
722		20-15-420-021-0000		$26,257		$76,298
723		20-15-420-022-0000		$24,370		$70,814
724		20-15-420-023-0000		$31,373		$91,164

107390

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 9 of 25)

No.	PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
725	20-15-420-024-0000	$28,649		$83,248
726	20-15-420-025-0000	$32,730		$95,107
727	20-15-420-026-0000	$25,998		$75,545
728	20-15-420-027-0000	$30,267		$87,950
729	20-15-420-028-0000	$28,163		$81,836
730	20-15-420-029-0000	$26,809		$77,902
731	20-15-420-030-0000	$0		$0
732	20-15-420-032-1001	$25,647		$74,525
733	20-15-420-032-1002	$25,647		$74,525
734	20-15-420-033-0000	$32,577		$94,662
735	20-15-421-002-0000	$27,457		$79,785
736	20-15-421-003-0000	$24,554		$71,349
737	20-15-421-004-0000	$26,134		$75,940
738	20-15-421-005-0000	$14,032		$40,774
739	20-15-421-006-0000	$15,534		$45,139-
740	20-15-421-007-0000	$24,694		$71,756
741	20-15-421-008-0000	$24,433		$70,997
742	20-15-421-009-0000	$27,349		$79,47!
743	20-15-421-010-0000	$17,095		$49,675
744	20-15-421-011-0000	$25,022		$72,709
745	20-15-421-012-0000	$23,850		$69,303
746	20-15-421-013-0000	$23,662		$68,757
747	20-15-421-014-0000	$24,217		$70,370
748	20-15-421-015-0000	$24,867		$72,259
749	20-15-421-016-0000	$86,897		$252,505
750	20 15-421-017-0000	$28,292		$82,211
751	20-15-421-018-0000	$24,945		$72,485
752	20-15-421-019-0000	$24,599		$71,480
753	20-15-421-020-0000	$22,314		$64,840
754	20-15-421-021-0000	$26,217		$76,181
755	20-15-421-022-0000	$24,048		$69,879
756	20-15-421-023-0000	$25,561		$74,275
757	20-15-421-024-0000	$26,376		$76,643
758	20-15-421-025-0000	$23,258		$67,583
759	20-15-421-026-0000	$25,52!		$74,159
760	20-15-421-027-0000	$24,546		$71,326
761	20-15-421-028-0000	$27,372		$79,538
762	20-15-421-029-0000	$29,865		$86,782
763	20-15-421-030-0000	$21,700		$63,056
764	20-15-421-031-0000	$0		$0
765	20-15-421-032-0000	$0		$0
766	20-15-421-033-1001	$2,560		$7,439
767	20-15-421-033-1002	$2,560		$7,439
768	20-15-421-033-1003	$2,560		$7,439
769	20-15-421-033-1004	$1,652		$4,800
770	20-15-421-033-1005	$1,652		' $4,800
No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
771	20-15-421-033-1006		$1,652		$4,800
772	20-15-421-033-1007		$1,901		$5,524
773	20-15-421-033-1008		$1,901		$5,524
774	20-15-421-033-1009		$1,901		$5,524
775	20-15-421-033-1010		$2,146		$6,236
776	20-15-421-033-1011		$2,146		$6,236
777	20-15-421-033-1012		$2,148		$6,242
778	20-15-422-001-0000		$69,259		$201,253
779	20-15-422-002-0000		$129,544		$376,429
780	20-15-422-003-0000		$27,130		$78,834
781	20-15-422-004-0000		$21,482		$62,422
782	20-15-422-005-0000		$19,861		$57,712
783	20-15-422-006-0000		$25,759		$74,851
784	20-15-422-007-0000		$26,810		$77,904
785	20-15-422-008-0000		$25,468		$74,005
786	20-15-422-009-0000		$24,323		$70,684
787	20-15-422-010-0000		$22,318		$64,852
788	20-15-422-011-0000		$2,348		$6,823
789	20-15-422-012-0000		$25,976		$75,481
790	20-15-422-014-0000		$32,346		$93,991
791	20-15-422-015-0000		$24,600		$71,483
792	20-15-422-016-0000		$27,757		$80,656
793	20-15-422-017-0000		$24,586		$71,442
794	20-15-422-018-0000		$24,324		$70,681
795	20-15-422-019-0000		$23,369		$67,906
796	20-15-422-020-0000		$32,638		$94,840
797	20-15-422-021-0000		$2,348		$6,823
798	20-15-422-022-0000		$23,573		$68,498
799	20-15-422-023-0000		$30,549		$88,769
800	20-15-422-024-0000		$22,045		$64,058
801	20-15-422-025-0000		$22,583		$65,622
802	20-15-422-026-0000		$26,217		$76,18!
803	20-15-422-027-0000		$0		$0
804	20-15-422-028-0000		$17,360		$50,445
805	20-15-422-029-1001		$14,073		$40,893
806	20-15-422-029-1002		$16,103		$46,792
807	20-15-422-029-1003		$16,419		$47,710
808	20-15-422-029-1004		$16,735		$48,629
809	20-15-422-029-1005		$14,615		$42,468
810	20-15-422-029-1006		$16,103		$46,792
81!	20-15-422-029-1007		$16,419		$47,710
812	20-15-422-029-1008		$16,735		$48,629
813	20-15-422-029-1009		$14,615		$42,468
814	20-15-422-029-1010		$17,366		$50,462
815	20-15-422-029-1011		$17,773		$51,645
816	20-15-422-029-1012		$18,223		$52,952

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107391

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Est/mated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 10 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
8I7	20-15-422-029-1013		$14,615		$42,468
8I8	20-15-422-029-1014		$16,103		$46,792
8I9	20-15-422-029-1015		$16,419		$47,710
820	20-15-422-029-1016		$16,735		$48,629
821	20-15-422-029-1017		$16,690		$48,498
822	20-15-422-029-1018		$16,103		$46,792
823	20-15-422-029-1019		$16,419		$47,710
824	20-15-422-029-1020		$16,735		$48,629
825	20-15-422-029-1021		$16,103		$46,792
826	20-15-422-029-1022		$16,419		$47,710
827	20-15-422-029-1023		$16,735		$48,629
828	20-15-422-029-1024		$15,111		$43,910
829	20-15-422-029-1025		$16,103		$46,792
830	20-15-422-029-1026		$16,419		$47,710
831	20-15-422-029-1027		$16,735		$48,629
832	20-15-422-029-1028		$1,037		$3,013
833	20-15-422-029-1029		$1,037		$3,013
834	20-15-422-029-1030		$1,037		$3,013
835	20-15-422-029-1031		$1,037		$3,013
836	20-15-422-029-1032		$1,037		$3,013
837	20-15-422-029-1033		$1,037		$3,013
838	20-15-422-029-1034		$1,037		$3,013
839	20-15-422-029-1035		$1,037		$3,013
840	20-15-422-029-1036		$1,037		$3,013
841	20-15-422-029-1037		$1,037		$3,013
842	20-15-422-029-1038		$1,037		$3,013
843	20-15-422-029-1039		$1,037		$3,013
844	20-15-423-001-0000		$76,542		$222,416
845	20-15-423-002-0000		$25,655		$74,548
846	20-15-423-003-0000		$25,050		$72,790
847	20-15-423-004-0000		$26,137		$75,949
848	20-15-423-005-0000		$2,887		$8,389
849	20-15-423-006-0000		$25,364		$73,703
850	20-15-423-007-0000		$24,048		$69,879
851	20-15-423-008-0000		$25,954		$75,417
852	20-15-423-009-0000		$26,258		$76,300
853	20-15-423-010-0000		$26,396		$76,701
854	20-15-423-011-0000		$27,632		$80,293
855	20-15-423-012-0000		$24,783		$72,014
856	20-15-423-013-0000		$25,658		$74,557
857	20-15-423-014-0000		$23,545		$68,417
858	20-15-423-033-0000		$185,551		$539,174
859	20-22-108-011-0000		$1,238,306		$3,598,270
860	20-22-108-023-0000		$2,350,717		$6,830,713
861	20-22-108-032-0000		$0		$0
862	20-22-108-033-0000		$0		$0
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
863		20-22-108-038-0000		. $0		$0
864		20-22-108-040-0000		$502,284		$1,459,537
865		20-22-108-044-0000		$0		$0
866		20-22.108-045-0000		$860		$2,499
867		20-22-200-001-0000		$106,426		$309,253
868		20-22-200-002-0000		$4,950		$14,384
869		20-22-200-003-0000		$4,950		$14,384
870		20-22-200-004-0000		$4,950		$14,384
871		20-22-200-005-0000		$28,127		$81,731
872		20-22-200-006-0000		$32,636		$94,834
873		20-22-200-008-0000		$29,709		$86,328
874		20-22-200-009-0000		$6,984		$20,294
875		20-22-200-010-0000		$13,973		$40,603
876		20-22,200-011-0000		$90,707		$263,576
877		20-22-200-012-0000		$240,402		$698,560
878		20-22-200-013-0000		$40,859		$118,728
879		20-22-200-014-0000		$9,332		$27,117
880		20-22-200-015-0000		$10,667		$30,996
881		20-22-200-016-0000		$18,022		$52,368
882		20-22-200-017-0000		$0		$0
883		20-22-200-018-0000		$0		$0
884		20-22-200-019-0000		$4,552		$13,227
885		20-22-200-020-0000		$4,294		$12,478
886		20-22-200-021-0000		$4,498		$13,070
887		20-22-200-022-0000		$4,498		$13,070
888		20-22-200-023-0000		$4,498		$13,070
889		20-22-200-024-0000		$4,498		$13,070
890		20-22-200-025-0000		$20,475		$59,496
891		20-22-200-026-0000		$19,012		$55,245
892		20-22-200-027-0000		$20,908		$60,754
893		20-22-200-028-0000		$20,908		$60,754
894		20-22-200-029-0000		$20,816		$60,487
895		20-22-200-030-0000		$20,586		$59,819
896		20-22-200-031-0000		$20,954		$60,888
897		20-22-200-032-0000		$0		$0
898		20-22-200-033-0000		$0		$0
899		20-22-200-034-0000		$52,269		$151,883
900		20-22-201-007-0000		$58,676		$170,501
901		20-22-201-008-0000		$86,961		$252,691
902		20-22-201-009-0000		$86,961		$252,691
903		20-22-201-014-0000		$20,753		$60,304
904		20-22-201-015-0000		$23,796		$69,146
905		20-22-201-016-0000		$1,542		$4,481
906		20-22-201-017-0000		$1,542		$4,481
907		20-22-201-018-0000		$1,542		$4,481
908		20-22-201-019-0000		$13,343		$38,772

107392

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawrv Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 11 of 25)

No.	PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
909	20-22-201-020-0000	$2,387		$6,936
910	20-22-201-021-0000	$5,517		$16,031
911	20-22-201-022-0000	$24,899		$72,352
912	20-22-201-023-0000	$24,927		$72,433
913	20-22-201-024-0000	$27,082		$78,695
914	20-22-201-025-0000	$28,515		$82,859
915	20-22-201-026-0000	$25,388		$73,772
916	20-22-201-027-0000	$25,657		$74,554
917	20-22-201-028-0000	$24,070		$69,943
918	20-22-201-033-0000	$8,801		$25,574
919	20-22-201-034-0000	$8,908		$25,885
920	20-22-201-035-0000	$9,450		$27,460
921	20-22-201-036-0000	$15,424		$44,819
922	20-22-201-037-0000	$8,873		$25,783
923	20-22-201-038-0000	$8,898		$25,856
924	20-22-201-039-0000	$8,948		$26,001
925	20-22-201-040-0000	$8,888		$25,827
926	20-22-201-041-0000	$16,494		$47,928
927	20-22-201-042-0000	$39,080		$113,559
928	20-22-201-043-0000	$19,487		$56,625
929	20-22-201-045-0000	$22,888		$66,508
930	20-22-201-046-0000	$16,497		$47,937
931	20-22-202-001-0000	SO		$0
932	20-22-202-004-0000	$23,088		$67,089
933	20-22-202-005-0000	$24,290		$70,582
934	20-22-202-006-0000	$24,248		$70,460
935	20-22-202-007-0000	$24,248		$70,460
936	20-22-202-008-0000	$23,088		$67,089
937	20-22-202-009-0000	$24,248		$70,460
938	20-22-202-010-0000	$30,030		$87,261
939	20-22-202-011-0000	$24,374		$70,826
940	20-22-202-012-0000	$4,697		$13,649
941	20-22-202-013-0000	$24,160		$70,204
942	20-22-202-014-0000	$24,721		$71,834
943J	2O-22-202-015-0000	$24,729		$71,858
944	20-22-202-016-0000	$25,889		$75,228
945	20-22-202-017-0000	$2,254		$6,550
946	20-22-202-018-0000	$24,261		$70,498
947	20-22-202-019-0000	$0		$0
948	20-22-202-020-0000	$0		$0
949	20-22-202-021-0000	$0		$0
950	20-22-202-022-0000	$24,958		$72,523
951	20-22-202-023-0000	$25,369		$73,717
952	20-22-202-024-0000	$2,348		$6,823
953	20-22-202-025-0000	$21,289		$61,862
954	20-22-202-026-0000	$0		$0
No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
955	20-22-202-027-0000		$2,348		$6,823
956	20-22-202-028-0000		$0		$0
957	20-22-202-029-0000		$10,769		$31,293
958	20-22-202-030-0000		$12,047		$35,006
959	20-22-202-031-0000		$22,219		$64,564
960	20-22-202-032-0000		$12,802		$37,200
961	20-22-202-033-0000		$8,698		$25,275
962	20-22-202-034-0000		$8,698		$25,275
963	20-22-202-035-0000		$15,997		$46,484
964	20-22-202-036-0000		$12,850		$37,340
965	20-22-202-037-0000		$22,325		$64,872
966	20-22-202-038-0000		$2,254		$6,550
967	20-22-202-039-0000		$23,358		$67,874
968	20-22-202-040-0000		$43,599		$126,690
969	20-22-203-001-0000		$0		$0
970	20-22-203-007-0000		$0		$0
971	20-22-203-008-0000		$5,445		$15,822
972	20-22-203-009-0000		$0		$0
973	20-22-203-010-0000		$2,348		$6,823
974	20-22-203-011-0000		$2,348		$6,823
975	20-22-203-012-0000		$23,042		$66,955
976	20-22-203-013-0000		$24,276		$70,541
977	20-22-203-014-0000		$15,150		$44,023
978	20-22-203-015-0000		$0		$0
979	20-22-203-016-0000		$15,562		$45,220
980	20-22-203-017-0000		$15,683		$45,572
981	20-22-203-018-0000		$11,903		$34,588
982	20-22-203-019-0000		$22,575		$65,598
983	20-22-203-023-0000		$2,279		$6,622
984	20-22-203-024-0000		$12,750		$37,049
985	20-22-203-025-0000		$12,824		$37,264
986	20-22-203-026-0000		$21,412		$62,219
987	20-22-203-027-0000		$5,243		$15,235
988	20-22-203-028-0000		$25,553		$74,252
989	20-22-203-029-0000		$22,744		$66,090
990	20-22-203-030-0000		$24,952		$72,506
991	20-22-203-031-0000		$23,462		$68,176
992	20-22-203-032-0000		$13,043		$37,900
993	20-22-203-033-0000		$24,923		$72,421
994	20-22-203-034-0000		$17,140		$49,805
995	20-22-203-035-0000		$25,921		$75,321
996	20-22-203-036-0000		$19,456		$56,535
997	20-22-203-037-0000		$11,927		$34,657
998	20-22-203-038-0000		$22,134		$64,317
999	20-22-203-039-0000		$10,458		$30,389
1000	20-22-203-040-0000		$15,075		$43,805

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107393

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan Ana* Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 12 of 25)

No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1001		20-22-203-041-0000	$10,453		$30,374
1002		20-22-203-042-0000	$26,700		$77,585
1003		20-22-203-043-0000	$22,666		$65,863
1004		20-22-203-044-0000	$20,068		$58,314
1005		20-22-203-045-0000	$0		$0
1006		20-22-203-048-0000	$13,293		$38,627
1007		20-22-203-049-0000	$13,020		$37,834
1008		20-22-203-050-0000	$20,510		$59,598
1009		20-22-203-051-0000	$16,347		$47,501
1010		20-22-203-052-0000	$6,472		$18,806
1011		20-22-203-053-0000	$4,776		$13,878
1012		20-22-204-001-0000	$12,032		$34,963
1013		20-22-204-002-0000	$47,880		$139,130
1014		2O-22-2O4-O03-OO0O	$0		$0
1015		20-22-204-004-0000	$0		$0
1016		20-22-204-005-0000	$41,519		$120,646
1017		20-22-204-006-0000	$3,749		$10,894
1018		20-22-204-007-0000	$25,856		$75,132
1019		20-22-204-008-0000	$25,787		$74,932
1020		20-22-204-009-0000	$16,206		$47,091
1021		20-22-204-010-0000	$22,498		$65,375
1022		20-22-204-011-0000	$24,284		$70,564
1023		20-22-204-012-0000	$26,902		$78,172
1024		20-22-204-013-0000	$26,005		$75,565
1025		20-22-204-014-0000	$24,453		$71,056
1026		20-22-204-015-0000	$23,293		$67,685
1027		20-22-204-016-0000	$24,220		$70,378
1028		20-22-204-017-0000	$27,553		$80,064
1029		20-22-204-018-0000	$22,988		$66,799
1030		20-22-204-019-0000	$0		$0
1031		20-22-204-020-0000	$0		$0
1032		20-22-204-021-0000	$0		$0
1033		20-22-204-022-0000	$28,008		$81,386
1034		20-22-204-023-0000	$2,340		$6,800
1035		20-22-204-024-0000	$28,452		$82,676
1036		20-22-204-025-0000	$23,242		$67,537
1037		20-22-204-026-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1038		20-22-204-027-0000	$23,441		$68,115
1039		20-22-204-028-0000	$23,413		$68,033
1040		20-22-204-029-0000	$15,990		$46,464
1041		20-22-204-030-0000	$24,869		$72,264
1042		20-22-204-031-0000	$26,619		$77,349
1043		20-22-204-032-0000	$23,350		$67,850
1044		20-22-204-034-0000	$23,017		$66,883
1045		20-22-204-035-0000	$22,627		$65,750
1046		20-22-204-036-0000	$22,786		$66,212
No.	PIN			2008 Proposed AV		20O8 Proposed EAV
1047	20-22-204-037-0000			$20,368		$59,185
1048	20-22-204-038-0000			$22,830		$66,339
1049	20-22-204-039-0000			$2,257		$6,558
1050	20-22-204-040-0000			$2,254		$6,550
1051	20-22-204-041-0OO0			$2,333		$6,779
1052	20-22-204-042-1001			$26,605		$77,309
1053	20-22-204-042-1002			$18,393		$53,446
1054	20-22-205-001-0000			$0		$0
1055	20-22-205-002-0000			$0		$0
1056	20-22-205-003-0000			$0		$0
1057	20-22-205-004-0000			$0		$0
1058	20-22-205-005-0000			$0		$0
1059	20-22-205-006-0000			$0		$0
1060	20-22-205-007-0000			$18,999		$55,207
1061	20-22-205-008-0000			$30,697		$89,199
1062	20-22-205-009-0000			$11,765		$34,187
1063	20-22-205-010-0000			$23,150		$67,269
1064	20-22-205-011-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1065	20-22-205-014-0000			$0		$0
1066	20-22-205-015-0000			$2,818		$8,189
1067	20-22-205-016-0000			$16,069		$46,693
1068	20-22-205-017-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1069	20-22-205-018-0000			$25,083		$72,886
1070	20-22-205-019-0000			$2,254		$6,550
1071	20-22-205-020-0000			$24,176		$70,251
1072	20-22-205-021-0000			$27,267		$79,232
1073	20-22-205-022-0000			$0		$0
1074	20-22-205-023-0000			$0		$0
1075	20-22-205-024-0000			$0		$0
1076	20-22-205-025-0000			$3,287		$9,551
1077	20-22-205-026-0000			$24,838		$72,174
1078	20-22-205-027-0000			$2,818		$8,189
1079	20-22-205-028-0000			$26,027		$75,629
1080	20-22-205-029-0000			$0		$0
1081	20-22-205-030-0000			$5,072		$14,738
1082	20-22-205-031-0000			$21,850		$63,492
1083	20-22-205-032-0000			$0		$0
1084	20-22-205-033-0000			$24,530		$71,279
1085	20-22-205-034-0000			$24,205		$70,335
1086	20-22-205-035-0000			$26,752		$77,736
1087	20-22-205-036-0000			$21,198		$61,597
1088	20-22-205-037-0000			$16,122		$46,847
1089	20-22-205-038-0000			$26,751		$77,733
1090	20-22-206-001-0000			$0		$0
1091	20-22-206-002-0000			$0		$0
1092	20-22-206-003-0000			$60,422		$175,574

107394

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

/Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 13 of 25)

No.	PIN			2008 Proposed AV	2008 Proposed EAV
1093	20-22-206-004-0000			$23,078	$67,060
1094	20-22-206-005-0000			$12,245	$35,582
1095	20-22-206-006-0000			$0	$0
1096	20-22-206-007-0000			$16,210	$47,103
1097	20-22-206-008-0000			$2,818	$8,189
1098	20-22-206-009-0000			$2,348	$6,823
1099	20-22-206-010-0000			$23,750	$69,013
1100	20-22-206-012-0000			$24,860	$72,238
1101	20-22-206-013-0000			$2,348	$6,823
1102	20-22-206-014-0000			$2,348	$6,823
1103	20-22-206-015-0000			$2,348	$6,823
1104	20-22-206-016-0000			$2,348	$6,823 ,
1105	20-22-206-017-0000			$24,094	$70,012
1106	20-22-206-018-0000			$40,346	$117,237
1107	20-22-206-020-0000			$2,340	$6,800
1108	20-22-206-021-0000			$2,348	$6,823
1109	20-22-206-022-0000			$0	$0
1110	20-22-206-023-0000			$2,348	$6,823
IIII	20-22-206-026-0000			$24,044	$69,867
1112	20-22-206-027-0000			$23,629	$68,661
1113	20-22-206-028-0000			$0	$0
1114	20-22-206-029-0000			$23,709	$68,894
1115	20-22-206-030-0000			$22,884	$66,496
1116	20-22-206-031-0000			$22,474	$65,305
1 117	20-22-206-032-0000			$2,348	$6,823
1118	20-22-206-033-0000			$22,751	$66,110
1119	20-22-206-034-0000			$23,641	$68,696
1120	20-22-206-035-0000			$24,477	$71,125
1121	20-22-206-036-0000			$20,597	$59,851
1122	20-22-206-038-0000			$2,818	$8,189
1123	20-22-206-039-0000			$2,818	$8,189
1124	20-22-206-040-0000			$3,574	$10,385
1125	20-22-206-042-1001			$3,055	$8,877
1126	20-22-206-042-1002			$3,055	$8,877
1127	20-22-206-042-1003			$3,063	$8,900
1128	20-22-206-043-1001			$14,837	$43,113
1129	20-22-206-043-1002			$9,248	$26,873
[130	20-22-207-006-0000			$24,697	$71,765
1131	20-22-207-007-0000			$21,045	$61,153
1132	20-22-207-008-0000			$2,348	$6,823
1133	20-22-207-009-0000			$2,348	$6,823
1134	20-22-207-010-0000			$19,865	$57,724
1135	20-22-207-011-0000			$0	$0
1136	20-22-207-012-0000			$24,549	$71,334
1137	20-22-207-017-0000			$16,700	$48,527
1138	20-22-207-018-0000			$17,511	$50,883
No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1139		20-22-207-019-0000	$6,377		$18,530
1140		20-22-207-039-0000	$31,745		$92,245
1141		20-22-207-047-0000	$18,819		$54,684
1142		20-22-208-001-0000	$47,185		$137,110
1143		20-22-208-002-0000	$12,276		$35,672
1144		20-22-208-003-0000	$6,138		$17,836
1145		20-22-208-004-0000	$6,138		$17,836
1146		20-22-208-005-0000	$6,820		$19,818
1147		20-22-208-006-0000	$6,854		$19,916
1148		20-22-208-007-0000	$6,138		$17,836
1149		20-22-208-008-0000	$79,800		$231,883
1150		20-22-208-009-0000	$53,670		$155,954
1151		20-22-208-010-0000	$19,300		$56,082
1152		20-22-208-011-0000	$2,063		$5,995
1153		20-22-208-012-0000	$2,063		$5,995
1154		20-22-208-013-0000	$26,248		$76,271
1155		20-22-208-014-0000	$17,068		$49,596'
1156		20-22-208-015-0000	$12,617		$36,662
1157		20-22-208-016-0000	$12,820		$37,252
1158		20-22-208-017-0000	$12,347		$35,878
1159		20-22-208-018-0000	$11,770		$34,201
1160		20-22-208-021-0000	$41,448		$120,440
1161		20-22-208-022-0000	$27,421		$79,680
1162		20-22-208-024-0000	$29,472		$85,640
1163		20-22-208-025-0000	$2,387		$6,936
1164		20-22-208-026-0000	$24,322		$70,675
1165		20-22-208-027-0000	$24,926		$72,430
1166		20-22-208-028-0000	$23,441		$68,115
1167		20-22-208-029-0000	$23,861		$69,335
1168		20-22-208-030-0000	$24,069		$69,940
1169		20-22-208-031-0000	$8,992		$26,129
1170		20-22-208-038-0000	$10,030		$29,145
1171		20-22-208-039-0000	$20,833		$60,537
1172		20-22-208-040-0000	$66,211		$192,396
1173		20-22-208-041-1001	$3,526		$10,246
1174		20-22-208-041-1002	$3,526		$10,246
1175		20-22-208-041-1003	$4,321		$12,556
1176		20-22-209-002-0000	$2,345		$6,814
1177		20-22-209-003-0000	$23,658		$68,745
1178		20-22-209-004-0000	$22,548		$65,520
1179		20-22-209-005-0000	$0		$0
1180		20-22-209-006-0000	$24,161		$70,207
1181		20-22-209-007-0000	$23,566		$68,478
1182		20-22-209-008-0000	$23,316		$67,752
1183		20-22-209-009-0000	$24,488		$71,157
1184		20-22-209-010-0000	$1,633		$4,745

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107395

Appendix. 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 14 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1185	20-22-209-011-0000		514,397		$41,835
1186	20-22-209-012-0000		$20,755		$60,310
1187	20-22-209-013-0000		$1,720		$4,998
1188	20-22-209-014-0000		$22,938		$66,653
1189	20-22-209-015-0000		$25,095		$72,921
1190	20-22-209-016-0000		$20,011		$58,148
1191	20-22-209-017-0000		$3,013		$8,755
1192	20-22-209-018-0000		$34,429		$100,044
1193	20-22-209-019-0000		$0		$0
1194	20-22-209-020-0000		$4,774		$13,872
1195	20-22-209-021-0000		$35,932		$104,411
1196	20-22-209-022-0000		$26,791		$77,849
1197	20-22-209-023-0000		$17,050		$49,544
1198	20-22-209-024-0000		$25,381		$73,752
1199	20-22-209-025-0000		$24,866		$72,256
1200	20-22-209-026-0000		$23,379		$67,935
1201	20-22-209-027-0000		$24,261		$70,498
1202	20-22-209-028-0000		$25,343		$73,642
1203	20-22-209-029-0000		$28,185		$81,900
1204	20-22-209-030-0000		$28,537		$82,923
1205	20-22-209-03 i-0000		$25,343		$73,642
1206	20-22-209-032-0000		$22,072		$64,137
1207	20-22-209-033-0000		$24,653		$71,637
1208	20-22-209-034-0000		$24,230		$70,408
1209	20-22-209-035-0000		$22,700		$65,962
1210	20-22-209-036-0000		$2,387		$6,936
I2\|\|	20-22-209-037-0000		$16,865		$49,006
1212	20-22-209-038-0000		$3,696		$10,740
1213	20-22-209-039-0000		$1,078		$3,132
1214	20-22-210-001-0000		$14,956		$43,459
1215	20-22-210-002-0000		$14,956		$43,459
1216	20-22-210-003-0000		$13,304		$38,659
1217	20-22-210-004-0000		$20,255		$58,857
1218	20-22-210-005-0000		$23,337		$67,813
1219	20-22-210-006-0000		$12,497		$36,314
1220	20-22-210-007-0000		$12,235		$35,552
1221	20-22^210-008-0000		$24,235		$70,422
1222	20-22-210-009-0000		$2,348		$6,823
1223	20-22-210-010-0000		$25,214		$73,267
1224	20-22-210-011-0000		$2,348		$6,823
1225	20-22-210-012-0000		$12,813		$37,232
1226	20-22-210-013-0000		$21,621		$62,826
1227	20-22-210-014-0000		$21,861		$63,524
1228	20-22-210-015-0000		$11,609		$33,733
1229	20-22-210-016-0000		$23,177		$67,348
1230	20-22-210-017-0000		$22,536		$65,485
No.	PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1231	20-22-210-018-0000	$11,945		$34,710
1232	20-22-210-019-0000	$19,556		$56,826
1233	20-22-210-020-0000	$25,699		$74,676
1234	20-22-210-021-0000	$11,923		$34,646
1235	20-22-210-022-0000	$17,646		$51,276
1236	20-22-210-023-0000	$44,728		$129,971
1237	20-22-210-024-0000	$27,928		$81,153
1238	20-22-210-025-0000	$1,650		$4,795
1239	20-22-210-026-0000	$4,864		$14,134
1240	20-22-210-027-0000	$14,710		$42,744
1241	20-22-210-028-0000	$14,099		$40,969
1242	20-22-210-029-0000	$13,509		$39,254
1243	20-22-210-030-0000	$15,266		$44,360
1244	20-22-210-031-0000	$20,117		$58,456
1245	20-22-210-032-0000	$23,033		$66,929
1246	20-22-210-033-0000	$27,330		$79,416
1247	20-22-210-034-0000	$24,733		$71,869
1248	20-22-210-035-0000	$20,161		$58,584
1249	20-22-210-036-0000	$24,050		$69,884
1250	20-22-210-037-0000	$16,593		$48,216
1251	20-22-210-038-0000	$11,899		$34,576
1252	20-22-210-039-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1253	20-22-210-040-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1254	20-22-210-041-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1255	20-22-210-042-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1256	20-22-210-043-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1257	20-22-210-044-0000	$0		$0
1258	20-22-210-045-0000	$10,680		$31,034
1259	20-22-210-046-0000	$10,594		$30,784
1260	20-22-210-047-0000	$3,446		$10,013
1261	20-22-211-001-0000	$2,254		$6,550
1262	20-22-211-002-0000	$4,603		$13,375
1263	20-22-211-003-0000	$29,200		$84,849
1264	20-22-211-004-0000	$12,008		$34,893
1265	20-22-211-005-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1266	20-22-211-006-0000	$1,594		$4,632
1267	20-22-211-007-0000	$25,464		$73,993
1268	20-22-211-008-0000	$17,024		$49,468
1269	20-22-211-009-0000	$13,375		$38,865
1270	20-22-211-010-0000	$13,099		$38,063
1271	20-22-211-011-0000	$21,293		$61,873
1272	20-22-211-012-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1273	20-22-211-013-0000	$14,735		$42,817
1274	20-22-211-014-0000	$28,666		$83,298
1275	20-22-211-015-0000	$29,014		$84,309
1276	20-22-211-016-0000	$23,729		' $68,952

107396 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized /Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 15 of 25)

No.	PIN			2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1277	20-22-211-017-0000			$4,350		$12,640
1278	20-22-211-018-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1279	20-22-211-019-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1280	20-22-211-020-0000			$5,407		$15,712
1281	20-22-211-021-0000			$0		$0
1282	20-22-211-022-0000			$2,254		$6,550
1283	20-22-211-023-0000			$28,172		$81,862
1284	20-22-211-024-0000			$15,931		$46,292
1285	20-22-211-025-0000			$23,764		$69,053
1286	20-22-211-026-0000			$23,731		$68,958
1287	20-22-211-027-0000			$19,583		$56,904
1288	20-22-211-028-0000			$32,404		$94,160
1289	20-22-211-029-0000			$22,589		$65,639
1290	20-22-211-030-0000			$1,640		$4,766
1291	20-22-211-031-0000			$11,373		$33,048
1292	20-22-211-032-0000			$22,248		$64,648
1293	20-22-211-033-0000			$12,803		$37,203
1294	20-22-211-034-0000			$16,836		$48,922
1295	20-22-211-035-0000			$23,472		$68,205
1296	20-22-211-036-0000			$4,560		$13,250
1297	20-22-211-037-0000			$15,179		$44,107
-1298	20-22-211-038-0000			$22,431		$65,180
1299	20-22-211-039-0000			$6,575		$19,106
1300	20-22-211-040-0000			$0		$0
1301	20-22-212-002-0000			$11,338		$32,946
1302	20-22-212-003-0000			$23,648		$68,716
1303	20-22-212-004-0000			$25,307		$73,537
1304	20-22-212-005-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1305	20-22-212-006-0000			$23,231		$67,505
1306	20-22-212-007-0000			$0		$0
1307	20-22-212-008-0000			$0		$0
1308	20-22-212-009-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1309	20-22-212-010-0000			$21,146		$61,446
1310	20-22-212-011-0000			$25,361		$73,694
1311	20-22-212-012-0000			$23,610		$68,606
1312	20-22-212-013-0000			$13,489		$39,196
1313	20-22-212-014-0000			$18,881		$54,864
1314	20-22-212-015-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1315	20-22-212-016-0000			$24,136		$70,134
1316	20-22-212-018-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1317	20-22-212-019-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1318	20-22-212-020-0000			$21,616		$62,812
1319	20-22-212-021-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1320	20-22-212-022-0000			$2,197		$6,384
1321	20-22-212-025-0000			$2,348		$6,823
1322	20-22-212-026-0000			$2,348		$6,823
No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1323		20-22-212-027-0000	$1,948		$5,660
1324		20-22-212-028-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1325		20-22-212-029-0000	$0		$0
1326		20-22-212-030-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1327		20-22-212-031-0000	$0		$0
1328		20-22-212-032-0000	$30,915		$89,833
1329		20-22-212-033-0000	$26,417		$76,763
1330		20-22-212-034-0000	$12,290		$35,712
1331		20-22-212-035-0000	$17,636		$51,247
1332		20-22-212-036-0000	$15,803		$45,920
1333		20-22-212-037-0000	$15,134		$43,976
1334		20-22-212-038-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1335		20-22-212-039-0000	$22,133		$64,314
1336		20-22-212-040-0000	$23,080		$67,066
1337		20-22-212-041-0000	$22,917		$66,592
1338		20-22-212-044-0000	$0		$0
1339		20-22-212-045-0000	; $0		$0
1340		20-22-212-046-1001	$24,489		$71,160
1341		20-22-212-046-1002	$24,489		$71,160
1342		20-22-212-046-1003	$24,504		$71,204
1343		20-22-212-046-1004	$24,504		$71,204
1344		20-22-212-046-1005	$24,504		$71,204
1345		20-22-212-046-1006	$24,504		$71,204
1346		20-22-212-047-1001	$25,451		$73,956
1347		20-22-212-047-1002	$25,451		$73,956
1348		20-22-212-047-1003	$25,147		$73,072
1349		20-22-212-047-1004	$25,147		$73,072
1350		20-22-212-047-1005	$25,147		$73,072
1351		20-22-212-047-1006	$25,147		$73,072
1352		20-22-213-001-0000	$0		$0
1353		20-22-213-002-0000	$15,262		$44,348
1354		20-22-213-003-0000	$17,411		$50,593
1355		20-22-213-004-0000	$17,398		$50,555
1356		20-22-213-005-0000	$65,522		$190,394
1357		20-22-213-006-0000	$0		$0
1358		20-22-213-007-0000	$0		$0
1359		20-22-213-008-0000	$0		$0
1360		20-22-213-009-0000	$2,141		$6,221
1361		20-22-213-010-0000	$2,292		$6,660
1362		20-22-213-012-0000	$3,230		$9,386
1363		20-22-213-013-0000	$2,153		$6,256
1364		20-22-213-014-0000	$417		$1,212
1365		20-22-213-015-0000	$4,278		$12,431
1366		20-22-213-016-0000	$3,386		$9,839
1367		20-22-213-017-0000	$15,413		$44,787
j 1368		20-22-213-018-0000	$15,343		$44,584

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107397

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 16 of 25)

No.	PIN		■2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1369	20-22-213-019-0000		$22,180		$64,451
1370	20-22-213-020-0000		$22,985		$66,790
1371	20-22-213-021-0000		$22,498		$65,375
1372	20-22-213-022-0000		$12,108		$35,183
1373	20-22-213-023-0000		$22,110		$64,247
1374	20-22-213-024-0000		$21,274		$61,818
1375	20-22-213-025-0000		$0		$0
1376	20-22-213-026-0000		$23,516		$68,333
1377	20-22-213-027-0000		$23,168		$67,322
1378	20-22-213-028-0000		$20,104		$58,418
1379	20-22-213-029-0000		$27,942		$81,194
1380	20-22-213-031-0000		$21,275		$61,821
1381	20-22-213-032-0000		$20,524		$59,639
1382	20-22-213-033-0000		$2,263		$6,576
1383	20-22-213-034-0000		$12,275		$35,669
1384	20-22-213-035-0000		$0		$0
1385	20-22-213-036-0000		$0		$0
1386	20-22-213-037-0000		$2,217		$6,442
1387	20-22-213-038-0000		$2,217		$6,442
1388	20-22-213-039-0000		$2,217		$6,442
1389	20-22-213-040-0000		$12,910		$37,514
1390	20-22-213-043-0000		$28,521		$82,876
1391	20-22-213-044-0000		$5,176		$15,040
1392	20-22-213-045-0000		$17,240		$50,096
1393	20-22-213-046-0000		$0		$0
1394	20-22-213-047-0000		$813		$2,362
1395	20-22-213-050-0000		$2,127		$6,181
1396	20-22-213-051-1001		$24,234		$70,419
1397	20-22-213-051-1002		$23,641		$68,696
1398	20-22-213-051-1003		$23,641		$68,696
1399	20-22-213-051-1004		$23,641		$68,696
1400	20-22-213-051-1005		$23,641		$68,696
1401	20-22-214-002-0000		$27,904		$81,083
1402	20-22-214-003-0000		$24,581		$71,427
1403	20-22-214-004-0000		$24,707		$71,794
1404	20-22-214-005-0000		$25,122		$73,000
1405	20-22-214-006-0000		$24,732		$71,866
1406	20-22-214-007-0000		$24,701		$71,776
1407	20-22-214-008-0000		$25,888		$75,225
1408	20-22-214-009-0000		$23,451		$68,144
1409	20-22-214-010-0000		$31,886		$92,654
1410	20-22-214-011-0000		$24,745		$71,904
1411	20-22-214-012-0000		$14,834		$43,105
1412	20-22-2I4-0I3-O000		$15,816		$45,958
1413	20-22-214-014-0000		$21,059		$61,193
1414	20-22-214-015-0000		$0		$0
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1415		20-22-214-018-0000		$500		$1,453
1416		20-22-214-021-0000		$4,109		$11,940
1417		20-22-214-022-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1418		20-22-214-023-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1419		20-22-214-024-0000		$26,232		$76,225
1420		20-22-214-025-0000		$26,232		$76,225
1421		20-22-214-026-0000		$40,928		$118,929
1422		20-22-214-027-0000		$21,104		$61,324
1423		20-22-214-028-0000		$24,146		$70,163
1424		20-22-214-029-0000		$21,853		$63,500
1425		20-22-214-030-0000		$5,005		$14,544
1426		20-22-214-031-0000		$19,120		$55,559
1427		20-22-214-032-0000		$15,676		$45,551
1428		20-22-214-033-0000		$5,380		$15,633
1429		20-22-214-034-0000		$23,337		$67,813
1430		20-22-214-035-0000		$5,338'		$15,511
1431		20-22-214-036-0000		$22,075		$64,146
1432		20-22-214-037-0000		$1,570		$4,562
1433		20-22-214-038-0000		$24,971		$72,561
1434		20-22-214-039-0000		$28,770		$83,600
1435		20-22-214-040-0000		$0		$0
1436		20-22-214-041-0000		$0		$0
1437		20-22-214-042-0000		$10,800		$31,383
1438		20-22-214-043-0000		$0		$0
1439		20-22-214-044-0000		$50,781		$147,559
1440		20-22-214-045-0000		$22,377		$65,023
1441		20-22-214-046-0000		$17,397		$50,552
1442		20-22-215-001-0000		$0		$0
1443		20-22-215-002-0000		$5,122		$14,884
1444		20-22-215-003-0000		$23,440		$68,112
1445		20-22-215-004-0000		$23,782		$69,106
1446		20-22-215-005-0000		$23,366		$67,897
1447		20-22-215-006-0000		$24,229		$70,405
1448		20-22-215-007-0000		$25,239		$73,339
1449		20-22-215-008-0000		$20,037		$58,224
1450		20-22-215-009-0000		$23,199		$67,412
1451		20-22-215-010-0000		$0		$0
1452		20-22-215-011-0000		$48,682		$141,460
1453'		20-22-215-012-0000		$24,353		$70,765
1454		20-22-215-013-0000		$24,046		$69,873
1455		20-22-215-014-0000		$23,285		$67,662
1456		20-22-215-015-0000		$22,936		$66,647
1457		20-22-215-016-0000		$23,088		$67,089
1458		20-22-215-017-0000		$0		$0
1459		20-22-215-018-0000		$0		$0
1460		20-22-215-019-0000		$0		$0

107398

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 17 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1461	20-22-216-001-0000		$13,949		$40,533
1462	20-22-216-002-0000		$17,048		$49,538
1463	20-22-216-003-0000		$51,503		$149,657
1464	20-22-216-004-0000		$23,640		$68,693
1465	20-22-216-005-0000		$5,797		$16,845
1466	20-22-216-006-0000		$5,797		$16,845
1467	20-22-216-007-0000		$5,797		$16,845
1468	20-22-216-008-0000		$5,797		$16,845
1469	20-22-216-009-0000		$35,567		$103,351
1470	20-22-216-010-0000		$5,745		$16,694
1471	20-22-216-011-0000		$0		$0
1472	20-22-216012-0000		- $29,686		$86,262
1473	20-22-216-013-0000		$29,686		$86,262
1474	20-22-216-014-0000		$29,686		$86,262
147S	20-22-216-015-0000		$29,686		$86,262
1476	20-22-216-016-0000		$180,221		$523,686
1477	20-22-216-017-0000		$87,949		$255,562
1478	20-22-216-022-0000		$22,153		$64,372
1479	20-22-216-023-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1480	20-22-216-024-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1481	20-22-216-025-0000		$12,387		$35,994
1482	20-22-216-026-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1483	20-22-216-027-0000		$13,893		$40,370
1484	20-22-216-028-0000		$14,388		$41,809
1485	20-22-216-029-0000		$15,803		$45,920
I486	20-22-216-030-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1487	20-22-216-031-0000		$26,234		$76,231
1488	20-22-216-032-0000		$2,199		$6,390
1489	20-22-216-033-0000		$11,820		. $34,347
1490	20-22-216-034-0000		$4,670		$13,570
1491	20-22-216-035-0000		$17,087		$49,651
1492	20-22-216-036-0000		$15,149		$44,020
1493	20-22-216-037-0000		$15,139		$43,991
1494	20-22-216-038-0000		$2,348		$6,823
1495	20-22-216-039-0000		$77,662		$225,670
1496	20-22-216-040-0000		$21,521		$62,536
1497	20-22-216-041-0000		$15,911		$46,234
1498	20-22-217-001-0000		$17,134		$49,788
1499	20-22-217-002-0000		$11,943		$34,704
1500	20-22-217-003-0000		$13,339		$38,760
1501	20-22-217-004-0000		$12,843		$37,319
1502	20-22-217-005-0000		$19,236		$55,896
1503	20-22-217-006-0000		$3,757		$10,917
1504	20-22-217-007-0000		$22,397		$65,081'
1505	20-22-217-008-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1506	20-22-217-009-0000		$22,879		$66,482
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1507		20-22-217-010-0000		$24,280		$70,553
1508		20-22-217-011-0000		$16,912		$49,143
1509		20-22-217-012-0000		$4,732		$13,750
1510		20-22-217-013-0000		$13,486		$39,188
1511		20-22-217-014-0000		$16,901		$49,111
1512		20-22-217-015-0000		$15,931		$46,292
1513		20-22-217-016-0000		$13,717		$39,859
1514		20-22-217-017-0000		$25,314		$73,557
-1515		20-22-217-018-0000		$15,602		$45,336
1516		20-22-217-019-0000		$17,356		$50,433
1517		20-22-217-020-0000		$13,934		$40,489
1518		20-22-217-021-0000		$9,461		$27,492
1519		20-22-217-022-0000		$9,461		$27,492
1520		20-22-217-023-0000		$14,030		$40,768
1521		20-22-217-024-0000		$14,030		$40,768
1522		20-22-217-025-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1523		20-22-217-026-0000		$0		$0
1524		20-22-217-027-0000		$14,843		$43,131
1525		20-22-217-028-0000		$30,962		$89,969
1526		20-22-217-029-0000		$20,740		$60,266
1527		20-22-217-030-0000		$23,896		$69,437
1528		20-22-217-031-0000		$24,273		$70,532
1529		20-22-217-032-0000		$24,021		$69,800
1530		20-22-217-033-0000		$12,854		$37,351
1531		20-22-217-034-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1532		20-22-217-035-0000		$8,487		$24,662
1533		20-22-217-036-0000		$8,487		$24,662
1534		20-22-217-037-0000		$15,562		$45,220
1535		20-22-217-038-0000		$26,152		$75,992
1536		20-22-217-039-0000		$22,188		$64,474
1537		20-22-217-040-0000		$27,391		.$79,593
1538		20-22-217-041-0000		$31,538		$91,643
1539		20-22-218-004-0000		$23,890		$69,420
1540		20-22-218-005-0000		$0		$0
1541		20-22-218-006-0000		$22,846		$66,386
1542		20-22-218-007-0000		$30,740		$89,324
1543		20-22-218-008-0000		$28,389		$82,493
1544		20-22-218-009-0000		$23,718		$68,920
1545		20-22-218-010-0000		$25,953		$75,414
1546		20-22-218-011-0000		$24,617		$71,532
1547		20-22-218-012-0000		$17,798		$51,717
1548		20-22-218-013-0000		$25,786		$74,929
1549		20-22-218-014-0000		$26,885		$78,122
1550		20-22-218-015-0000		$25,072		$72,854
1551		20-22-218-016-0000		$29,230		$84,937
1552		20-22-218-017-0000		$15,356		$44,621

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107399

Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Est/mated 2008 Egua/;zed Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 18 of 25)

No.	PIN	2008 Proposed AV	2008 Proposed EAV
1553	20-22-218-018-0000	$14,809	$43,032
1554	20-22-218-019-0000	$6,027	$17,513
1555	20-22-218-020-0000	$24,152	$70,181
1556	20-22-218-021-0000	$23,326	$67,781
1557	20-22-218-022-0000	$25,266	$73,418
1558	20-22-218-023-0000	$2,254	$6,550
1559	20-22-218-024-0000	$24,743	$71,898
1560	20-22-218-025-0000	$26,936	$78,271
1561	20-22-218-026-0000	$22,512	$65,415
1562	20-22-218-027-0000	$2,254	. $6,550
1563	20-22-218-028-0000	$2,348	$6,823
1564	20-22-218-029-0000	$32,147	$93,413
1565	20-22-218-030-0000	$22,301	$64,802
1566	20-22-218-031-0000	$14,418	$41,896
1567	20-22-218-032-0000	$22,346	$64,933
1568	20-22-218-033-0000	$24,632	$71,576
1569	20-22-218-034-0000	$15,515	$45,083
1570	20-22-218-036-0000	$24,409	$70,928
1571	20-22-218-037-0000	$24,559	$71,364
1572	20-22-218-038-0000	$33,931	$98,597
1573	20-22-218-039-0000	$22,851	$66,400
1574	20-22-218-040-0000	$16,941	$49,227
1575	20-22-218-041-0000	$22,061	$64,105
1576	20-22-218-042-0000	$3,334	$9,688
1577	20-22-218-043-0000	$16,218	$47,126
1578	20-22-218-044-0000	$28,436	$82,629
1579	20-22-218-045-0000	$24,595	$71,468
1580	20-22-218-047-1001	$17,388	$50,526
1581	20-22-218-047-1002	$22,356	$64,962
1582	20-22-218-047-1003	$22,356	$64,962
1583	20-22-218-047-1004	$17,387	$50,523
1584	20-22-218-047-1005	$22,356	$64,962
1585	20-22-218-047-1006	$22,356	$64,962
1586	20-22-219-001-0000	$24,693	$71,753
1587	20-22-219-002-0000	$12,263	$35,634
1588	20-22-219-003-0000	$24,203	$70,329
1589	20-22-219-004-0000	$5,326	$15,476
1590	20-22-219-005-0000	$5,545	$16,113
1591	20-22-219-006-0000	$21,923	$63,704
1592	20-22-219-007-0000	$12,390	$36,003
1593	20-22-219-008-0000.	$1,466	$4,260
1594	20-22-219-009-0000	$4,670	$13,570
1595	20-22-219-010-0000	$18,331	$53,266
1596	20-22-219-011-0000	$13,151	$38,214
1597	20-22-219-012-0000	$1,466	$4,260
1598	20-22-219-013-0000	$12,855	$37,354
No.	PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1599	20-22-219-014-0000	$13,211		$38,389
1600	20-22-219-015-0000	$25,512		$74,133
1601	20-22-219-016-0000	$2,254		$6,550
1602	20-22-219-017-0000	$26,651		$77,442
1603	20-22-219-018-0000	$20,137		$58,514
1604	20-22-219-019-0000	$15,715		$45,665
1605	20-22-219-020-0000	$16,928		$49,189
1606	20-22-219-021-0000	$15,763		$45,804
1607	20-22-219-022-0000	$1,972		$5,730
1608	20-22-219-023-0000	$0		$0
1609	20-22-219-024-0000	$25,319		$73,572
1610	20-22-219-025-0000	$30,813		$89,536
1611	20-22-219-028-0000	$24,236		$70,425
1612	20-22-219-029-0000	$24,236		$70,425
1613	20-22^219-030-0000	$27,676		$80,421
1614	20-22-219-031-0000	$15,839		$46,025
1615	20-22-219-032-0000	$17,148		$49,829
1616	20-22-219-033-0000	$2,254		$6,550
1617	20-22-219-034-0000	$16,222		$47,138
1618	20-22-219-035-0000	$16,176		$47,004
1619	20-22-219-036-0000	$13,635		$39,621
1620	20-22-219-037-0000	$24,995		$72,630
1621	20-22-219-038-0000	$24,483		$71,143
1622	20-22-219-039-0000	$25,777		$74,903
1623	20-22-219-040-0000	$26,894		$78,149
1624	20-22-219-041-0000	$24,947		$72,491
1625	20-22-219-042-0000	$24,518		$71,244
1626	20-22-219-043-0000	$0		$0
1627	20-22-219-044-0000	$0		$0
1628	20-22-219-045-1001	$17,899		$52,011
1629	20-22-219-045-1002	$17,899		$52,011
1630	20-22-219-046-1001	$24,548		$71,332
1631	20-22-219-046-1002	$18,783		$54,580
1632	20-22-219-046-1003	$24,541		$71,311
1633	20-22-220-002-0000	$28,491		$82,789
1634	20-22-220-003-0000	$14,064		$40,867
1635	20-22-220-004-0000	$22,368		$64,997
1636	20-22-220-005-0000	$13,185		$38,313
1637	20-22-220-006-0000	$14,191		$41,236
1638	20-22-220-007-0000	$14,273		$41,474
1639	20-22-220-008-0000	$1,787		$5,193
1640	20-22-220-009-0000	$13,960		$40,565
1641	20-22-220-010-0000	$17,851		$51,871
1642	20-22-220-011-0000	$23,810		$69,187
1643	20-22-220-012-0000	$23,421		$68,057
1644	20-22-220-013-0000	$2,536		$7,369

107400

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized /Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 19 of 25)

No.	PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1645	20-22-220-014-0000	$18,111		$52,627
1646	20-22-220-015-0000	$25,113		$72,973
1647	20-22-220-016-0000	$24,821		$72,125
'1648	20-22-220-017-0000	$2,160		$6,277
1649	20-22-220-019-0000	$26,932		$78,259
1650	20-22-220-020-0000	$24,718		$71,826
1651	20-22-220-021-0000	$22,240		$64,625
1652	20-22-220-022-0000	$28,152		$81,804
1653	20-22-220-023-0000	$22,600		$65,671
1654	20-22-220-024-0000	$23,913		$69,486
1655	20-22-220-O25-0000	$14,426		$41,919
1656	20-22-220-026-0000	$0		$0
1657	20-22-220-027-0000	$0		$0
1658	20-22-220-028-0000	$33,924		$98,576
1659	20-22-220-029-0000	$15,271		$44,374
1660	20-22-220-030-0000	$15,271		$44,374
1661	20-22-220-031-0000	$2,254		$6,550
1662	20-22-220-032-0000	$23,883		$69,399
1663	20-22-220-033-0000	$23,078		$67,060
1664	20-22-220-034-0000	$23,826		$69,234
1665	20-22-220-035-0000	$23,855		$69,318
1666	20-22-220-036-0000	$23,855		$69,318
1667	20-22-220-037-0000	$23,219		$67,470
1668	20-22-220-038-0000	$22,975		$66,761
1669	20-22-220-039-0000	$15,449		$44,892
1670	20-22-220-040-0000	$15,449		$44,892
1671	20-22-220-041-0000	$14,032		$40,774
1672	20-22-220-043-0000	$13,839		$40,213
1673	20-22-220-044-0000	$954		$2,772
1674	20-22-220-045-0000	$29,703		$86,311
1675	20-22-220-046-0000	$29,714		$86,343
1676	20-22-220-047-0000	$44,870		$130,383
1677	20-22-220-048-0000	$5,362		$15,581
1678	20-22-220-049-1001	$24,649		$71,625
1679	20-22-220-049-1002	$24,649		$71,625
1680	20-22-220-049-1003	$24,649		$71,625
1681	20-22-220-049-1004	$24,649		$71,625
1682	20-22-220-049-1005	$24,649		$71,625
1683	20-22-220-049-1006	$25,024		$72,715
1684	2O-22-220-049-1007	$25,024		$72,7 IS
1685	20-22-220-049-1008	$25,024		$72,715
1686	20-22-220-049-1009	$25,024		$72,715
1687	20-22-220-049-1010	$25,024		$72,715
1688	20-22-220-049-1011	$25,024		$72,715
1689	20-22-220-049-1012	$25,024		$72,715
1690	20-22-220-049-1013	$25,024		$72,715
No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		. 2008 Proposed EAV
1691	20-22-220-049-1014		$25,024		$72,715
1692	20-22-220-049-1015		$25,024		$72,715
1693	20-22-221-001-0000		$0		$0
1694	20-22-221-015-0000		$0		$0
1695	20-22-222-001-0000		$21,519		$62,530
1696	20-22-222-002-0000		$25,274		$73,441
1697	20-22-222-004-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1698	20-22-222-005-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1699	20-22-222-006-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1700	20-22-222-007-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1701	20-22-222-008-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1702	20-22-222-009-0000		$0		$0
1703	20-22-222-010-0000		$0		$0
1704	20-22-222-011-0000		$23,619		$68,632
1705	20-22-222-012-0000		$27,048		$78,596
1706	20-22-222-013-0000		$22,838		$66,363
1707	20-22-222-014-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1708	20-22-222-015-0000		$2,254		. $6,550
1709	20-22-222-016-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1710	20-22-222-017-0000		$11,476		$33,347
1711	20-22-222-018-0000		$20,085		$58,363
1712	20-22-222-019-0000		$23,088		$67,089
1713	20-22-222-020-0000		$16,202		$47,080
1714	20-22-222-021-0000		$39,089		$113,585
1715	20-22-222-023-0000		$0		$0
1716	20-22-222-024-0000		$0		$0
1717	20-22-222-025-0000		$8,742		$25,403
1718	20-22-222-026-0000		$22,354		$64,956
1719	20-22-222-027-0000		$23,212		$67,449
1720	20-22-222-028-0000		$0		$0
1721	20-22-222-029-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1722	20-22-222-030-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1723	20-22-222-031-0000		$0		$0
1724	20-22-222-032-0000		$24,244		$70,448
1725	20-22-222-033-0000		$23,494		$68,269
1726	20-22-222-034-0000		$2,254		$6,550
1727	20-22-222-039-0000		$11,862		$34,469
1728	20-22-222-040-0000		$1,588		$4,614
1729	20-22-222-041-0000		$24,257		$70,486
1730	20-22-222-042-0000		$24,033		$69,835
1731	20-22-222-043-0000		$1,466		$4,260
1732	20-22-222-044-0000		$23,444		$68,124
1733	20-22-222-045-0000		$6,419		$18,652
1734	20-22-222-048-0000		$4,710		$13,686
1735	20-22-222-049-0000		$24,340		$70,727
1736	20-22-222-050-0000		$0		$0

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107401

>Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 20 of 25)

No.	PIN			2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
I737	20-22-222-051-1001			$1,606		$4,667
1738	20-22-222-051-1002			$1,606		$4,667
1739	20-22-222-051-1003			$1,606		$4,667
1740	20-22-222-051-1004			$1,606		$4,667
1741	20-22-222-051-1005			$1,606		$4,667
1742	20-22-222-051-1006			$1,606		$4,667
1743	20-22-222-052-1001			$23,388		$67,961
1744	20-22-222-052-1002			$23,388		$67,961
1745	20-22-222-052-1003			$24,097		$70,021
1746	20-22-223-001-0000			$0		$0
1747	20-22-223-002-0000			$2,254		$6,550
1748	20-22-223-003-0000			$24,767		$71,968
1749	20-22-223-004-0000			$24,519		$71,247
1750	20-22-223-005-0000			$11,894		$34,562
1751	20-22-223-006-0000			$2,254		$6,550
1752	20-22-223-007-0000			$2,254		$6,550
1753	20-22-223-008-0000			$23,594		$68,559
1754	20-22-223-009-0000			$23,329		$67,789
1755	20-22-223-010-0000			$25,263		$73,409
1756	20-22-223-011-0000			$26,521		$77,065
1757	20-22-223-012-0000			$2,254		$6,550
1758	20-22-223-013-0000			$25,499		$74,095
1759	20-22-223-014-0000			$22,571		$65,587
1760	20-22-223-015-0000			$23,097		$67,115
1761	20-22-223-016-0000			$23,315		$67,749
1762	20-22-223-017-0000			$0		$0
1763	20-22-223-018-0000			$2,254		$6,550
1764	20-22-223-019-0000			$0		$0
1765	20-22-223-020-0000			$24,324		$70,681
1766	20-22-223-021-0000			$21,044		$61,150
1767	20-22-223-022-0000			$23,409		$68,022
1768	20-22-223-023-0000			$22,804		$66,264
1769	20-22-224-001-0000			$0		$0
1770	20-22-224-002-0000			$0		$0
1771	20-22-224-003-0000			$0		$0
1772	20-22-224-004-0000			$0		$0
1773	20-22-224-005-0000			$0		$0
1774	20-22-224-014-0000			$0		$0
1775	20-22-224-015-0000			$3,022		$8,781
1776	20-22-224-016-0000			$30,192		$87,732
1777	20-22-224-017-0000			$27,169		$78,948
1778	20-22-224-018-0000			$2,270		$6,596
1779	20-22-224-019-0000			$22,095		$64,204
1780	20-22-224-020-0000			$31,855		$92,564
1781	20-22-224-021-0000			$1,720		$4,998
1782	20-22-224-022-0000			$23,808		$69,181
No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1783		20-22-224-023-0000	$1,476		$4,289
1784		20-22-224-024-0000	$1,476		$4,289
1785		20-22-224-025-0000	$21,161		$61,490
1786		20-22-224-026-0000	$16,053		$46,647
1787		20-22-224-027-O000	$16,826		$48,893
1788		20-22-224-028-0000	$15,636		$45,435
1789		20-22-224-029-0000	$20,778		$60,377
1790		20-22-224-030-0000	$22,215		$64,552
1791		20-22-224-031-0000	$0		$0
1792		20-22-224-032-0000	$0		$0
1793		20-22-224-040-0000	$304,499		$884,813
1794		20-22-224-041-0000	$0		$0
1795		20-22-225-003-0000	$23,545		$68,417
1796		20-22-225-004-0000	$24,586		$71,442
1797		20-22-225-005-0000	$23,269		$67,615
1798		20-22-225-006-0000	$23,968		$69,646
1799		20-22-225-007-0000	$22,444		$65,218
1800		20-22-225-008-0000	$7,190		$20,893
1801		20-22-225-009-0000	$7,190		$20,893
1802		20-22-225-010-0000	$23,810		$69,187
1803		20-22-225-011-0000	$28,409		$82,551
1804		20-22-225-012-0000	$1,792		$5,207
1805		20-22-225-013-0000	$12,356		$35,904
1806		20-22-225-014-0000	$2,279		$6,622
1807		20-22-225-016-0000	$12,345		$35,872
1808		20-22-225-017-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1809		20-22-225-018-0000	$23,350		$67,850
1810		20-22-225-019-0000	$23,377		$67,929
1811		20-22-225-020-0000	$23,738		$68,978
1812		20-22-225-021.0000	$23,377		$67,929
1813		20-22-225-022-0000	$24,386		$70,861
1814		20-22-225-023-0000	$24,777		$71,997
1815		20-22-225-024-0000	$2,330		$6,771
1816		20-22-225-025-0000	$24,923		$72,421
1817		20-22-225-026-0000	$23,223		$67,481
1818		20-22-225-027-0000	$24,284		$70,564
1819		20-22-225-028-0000	$12,355		$35,901
1820		20-22-225-029-0000	$16,706		$48,544
1821		20-22-225-030-0000	$28,909		$84,004
1822		20-22-225-031-0000	$23,941		$69,568
1823		20-22-225-032-0000	$19,965		$58,014
1824		20-22-225-033-0000	$15,725		$45,694
1825		20-22-225-034-0000	$25,066		$72,837
1826		20-22-225-040-0000	$2,310		$6,712
1827		20-22-225-041-0000	$2,310		$6,712
1828		20-22-225-042-0000	$6,470		$18,801

107402

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TlF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 21 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1829	20-22-225-043-0000		$21,640		$62,882
1830	20-22-225-044-0000		$0		$0
1831	20-22-225-045-0000		$26,995		$78,442
1832	20-22-225-046-0000		$21,245		$61,734
1833	20-22-225-047-0000		$19,540		$56,779
1834	20-22-225-048-0000		$0		$0
1835	20-22-226-001-0000		$24,349		$70,753
1836	20-22-226-002-0000		$23,425		$68,068
1837	20-22-226-003-0000		$27,872		$80,990
1838	20-22-226-004-0000		$24,742		$71,895
1839	20-22-226-005-0000		$42,203		$122,633'
1840	20-22-226-006-0000		$26,299		$76,420
1841	20-22-226-007-0000		$5,554		$16,139
1842	20-22-226-008-0000		$21,789		$63,314
1843	20-22-226-009-0000		$2,330		$6,771
1844	20-22-226-010-0000		$23,535		$68,388
1845	20-22-226-011-0000		$24,702		$71,779
1846	20-22-226-012-0000		$48,166		$139,961
1847	20-22-226-013-0000		$20,916		$60,778
1848	20-22-226-014-0000		$14,628		$42,506
1849	20-22-226-015-0000		$42,490		$123,467
1850	20-22-226-016-0000		$15,447		$44,886
1851	20-22-226-017-0000		$22,362		$64,979
1852	20-22-226-018-0000		$0		$0
1853	20-22-226-019-0000		$23,074		$67,048
1854	20-22-226-020-0000		$23,012		$66,868
1855	20-22-226-021-0000		$0		$0
1856	20-22-226-022-0000		' $24,596		$71,471
1857	20-22-226-023-0000		$22,278		$64,735
1858	20-22-226-024-0000		$23,074		$67,048
1859	20-22-226-025-0000		$22,198		$64,503
1860	20-22-226-026-0000		$24,125		$70,102'
1861	20-22-226-027-0000		$25,433		$73,903.
1862	20-22-226-028-0000		$24,466		$71,093
1863	20-22-226-029-0000		$24,807		$72,084
1864	20-22-226-030-0000		$27,370		$79,532
1865	20-22-226-031-0000		$23,086		$67,083
1866	20-22-226-032-0000		$24,954		$72,511
1867	20-22-226-033-0000		$0		$0
1868	20-22-226-034-0000		$0		$0
1869	20-22-226-035-0000		$0		$0
1870	20-22-226-038-0000		$22,944		$66,671
1871	20-22-226-039-0000		$0		$0
1872	20-22-226-040-0000		$41,211		$119,751
1873	20-22-227-001-0000		$22,824		$66,322
1874	20-22-227-002-0000		$12,264		$35,637
No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1875		20-22-227-003-0000		$12,264		$35,637
1876		20-22-227-004-0000		$24,174		$70,245
1877		20-22-227-005-0000		$24,615		$71,526
1878		20-22-227-006-0000		$22,825		$66,325
1879		20-22-227-007-0000		$2,330		$6,771
1880		20-22-227-008-0000		$24,814		$72,105
1881		20-22-227-009-0000		$23,211		$67,447
1882		20-22-227-010-0000		$24,814		$72,105
1883		20-22-227-011-0000		$24,906		$72,372
1884		20-22-227-012-0000		$23,454		$68,153
1885		20-22-227-013-0000		$25,656		$74,551
1886		20-22-227-014-0000		$25,772		$74,888
1887		20-22-227-015-0000		$24,011		$69,771
1888		20-22-227-016-0000		$23,696		$68,856
1889		20-22-227-017-0000		$15,311		$44,491
1890		20-22-227-018-0000		$2,348		$6,823
1891		20-22-227-019-0000		$27,000		$78,457
1892		20-22-227-020-0000		$0		$0
1893		20-22-227-021-0000		$0		$0
1894		20-22-227-022-0000		$2,348		$6,823
1895		20-22-227-023-0000		$2,348		$6,823
1896		20-22-227-024-0000		$2,096		$6,091
1897		20-22-227-025-0000		$8,796		$25,559
1898		20-22-227-026-0000		$8,796		$25,559
1899		20-22-227-027-0000		$24,560		$71,366
1900		20-22-227-028-0000		$23,690		$68,838
1901		20-22-227-030-0000		$26,254		$76,289
1902		20-22-227-031-0000		$0		$0
1903		20-22-227-032-0000		$0		$0
1904		20-22-227-034-0000		$27,952		$81,223
1905		20-22-227-035-0000		$25,130		$73,023
1906		20-22-227-036-0000		$20,768		$60,348
1907		20-22-227-037-0000		$2,270		$6,596
1908		20-22-227-038-0000		$2,270		$6,596
1909		20-22-227-039-0000		$1,476		$4,289
1910		20-22-227-040-0000		$23,684		$68,821
1911		20-22-227-041-0000		$24,497		$71,183
1912		20-22-227-042-0000		$25,062		$72,825
1913		20-22-227-043-0000		$5,839		$16,967
1914		20-22-227-044-0000		$25,527		$74,176
1915		2O-22-227-045-0000		$5,839		$16,967
1916		20-22-227-046-0000		$39,888		$115,907
1917		20-22-227-047-1001		$22,484		$65,334
1918		20-22-227-047-1002		$23,889		$69,417
1919		20-22-227-047-1003		$23,889		$69,417
1920		2O-22-227-048-1001		$3,644		$10,589

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107403

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 22 of 25)

No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV	2008 Proposed EAV
1921	20-22-227-048-1002		$26,594	$77,277
1922	20-22-227-048-1003		$17,729	$51,517
1923	20-22-227-048-1004		$17,729	$51,517
1924	20-22-228-001-0000		$27,604	$80,212
1925	20-22-228-002-0000		$12,580	$36,555
1926	20-22-228-003-0000		$1,515	$4,402
1927	20-22-228-004-0000		$12,653	$36,767
1928	20-22-228-005-0000		$12,595	$36,599
1929	20-22-228-006-0000		$12,408	$36,055
1930	20-22-228-007-0000		$13,394	$38,920
1931	20-22-228-008-0000		$12,622	$36,677
1932	20-22-228-009-0000		$21,808	$63,370
1933	20-22-228-010-0000		$21,027	$61,100
1934	20-22-228-011-0000		$2,330	$6,771
1935	20-22-228-012-0000		$1,568	$4,556
1936	20-22-228-013-0000		$5,821	$16,915
1937	20-22-228-014-0000		$2,270	$6,596
1938	20-22-228-015-0000		$39,959	$1)6,113
1939	20-22-228-016-0000		$27,914	$81,113
1940	20-22-228-017-0000		$28,132	$81,746
1941	20-22-228-018-0000		$23,298	$67,699
1942	20-22-228-019-0000		$23,422	$68,060
1943	20-22-228-021-0000		$1,328	$3,859
1944	20-22-228-022-0000		$924	$2,685
1945	20-22-228-023-0000		$57,727	$167,743
1946	20-22-228-024-0000		$32,105	$93,291
1947	20-22-228-025-0000		$23,173	$67,336
1948	20-22-228-026-0000		.$0	$0
1949	20-22-228-027-0000		$0	$0
1950	20-22-228-028-0000		$19,470	$56,576
1951	20-22-228-029-0000		$24,549	$71,334
1952.	20-22-228-030-0000		$24,071	$69,946
1953	20-22-228-031-0000		$2,330	$6,771
1954	20-22-228-032-0000		$2,330	$6,771
1955	20-22-228-033-0000		$24,900	$72,354
1956	20-22-228-034-0000		$24,218	$70,373
1957	20-22-228-035-0000		$26,119	$75,897
1958	20-22-228-036-0000		$21,244	$61,731
1959	20-22-228-037-0000		$12,956	$37,648
1960	20-22-228-038-0000		$23,246	$67,548
1961	20-22-228-039-0000		$21,698	$63,050
1962	20-22-228-040-0000		$15,110	$43,907
1963	20-22-228-041-0000		$25,402	$73,813
1964	20-22-228-042-0000		$0	$0
1965	20-22-228-043-0000		$41,632	$120,974
1966	20-22-228-044-0000		$9,616	$27,942
No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
1967		20-22-229-001-0000	$2,330		$6,771
1968		20-22-229-002-0000	$12,714		$36,944
1969		20-22-229-003-0000	$22,646		$65,805
1970		20-22-229-004-0000	$26,144		$75,969
1971		20-22-229-005-0000	$12,086		$35,119
1972		20-22-229-006-0000	$11,493		$33,396
1973		20-22-229-007-0000	$24,359		. $70,782
1974		20-22-229-008-0000	$22,531		$65,471
1975		20-22-229-009-0000	$13,797		$40,091
1976		20-22-229-010-0000	$17,402		$50,567
1977		20-22-229-013-0000	$15,151		$44,026
1978		20-22-229-014-0000	$15,299		$44,456
1979		20-22-229-015-0000	$23,317		$67,755
1980		20-22-229-016-0000	$23,832		$69,251
1981		20-22-229-017-0000	$17,724		$51,502
1982		20-22-229-018-0000	$17,724		$51,502
1983		20-22-229-020-0000	$30,349		$88,188
1984		20-22-229-021-0000	$2,330		$6,771
1985		20-22-229-022-0000	$0		$0
1986		20-22-229-023-0000	$24,154		$70,187
1987		20-22-229-024-0000	$3,269		$9,499
1988		20-22-229-025-0000	$15,488		$45,005
1989		20-22-229-026-0000	$3,011		$8,749
1990		20-22-229-027-0000	$28,803		$83,696
1991		20-22-229-028-0000	$24,84 8		$72,203
1992		20-22-229-031-0000	$2,348		$6,823
1993		20-22-229-032-0000	$22,474		$65,305
1994		20-22-229-033-0000	$15,786		$45,871
1995		20-22-229-034-0000	$23,275		$67,632
1996		20-22-229-035-0000	$28,379		$82,464
1997		20-22-229-036-0000	$28,636		$83,210
1998		20-22-229-037-0000	$0		$0
1999		20-22-229-038-0000	$29,934		$86,982
2000		20-22-229-039-0000	$27,740		$80,607
2001		20-22-229-040-0000	$0		$0
2002		20-22-229-041-0000	$0		$0
2003		20-22-229-042-0000	$0		$0
2004		20-22-229-043-0000	$61,342		$178,248
2005		20-22-229-044-O0OO	$17,079		$49,628
2006		20-22-229-045-0000	$18,117		$52,644
2007		20-22-229-046-0000	$4,324		$12,565
2008		20-22-229-047-0000	$4,886		$14,198
2009		20-22-230-002-0000	$31,729		$92,198
2010		20-22-230-003-0000	$24,816		$72,110
2011		20-22-230-004-0000	$18,630		$54,135
2012		20-22-230-005-0000	$13,501		$39,231

107404 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 23 of 25)

No.		PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
2013		20-22-230-006-0000		$12,822		$37,258
2014		20-22-230-007-0000		$22,540		$65,497
2015		20-22-230-008-0000		$23,534		$68,385
2016		20-22-230-009-0000		$22,063		$64,111
2017		20-22-230-010-0000		$25,541		$74,217
2018		20-22-230-011-0000		$2,939		$8,540
2019		20-22-230-012-0000		$28,847		$83,824
2020		20-22-230-013-0000		$22,321		$64,860
2021		20-22-230-014-0000		$2,348		$6,823
2022		20-22-230-015-0000		$23,285		$67,662
2023		20-22-230-016-0000		$47,524		$138,095
2024		20-22-230-017-0000		$24,088		$69,995
2025		20-22-230-018-0000		$23,623		$68,644
2026		20-22-230-019-0000		$23,528		$68,368
2027		20-22-230-020-0000		$22,991		$66,807
2028		20-22-230-021-0000		$5,383		$15,642
2029		20-22-230-022-0000		$32,896		$95,589
2030		20-22-230-023-0000		$32,251		$93,715
2031		20-22-230-024-0000		$21,603		$62,774
2032		20-22-230-025-0000		$21,285		$61,850
2033		20-22-230-026-0000		$513		$1,491
2034		20-22-230-027-0000		$0		$0
2035		20-22-230-028-0000		$23,877		$69,382
2036		20-22-230-029-0000		$2,348		$6,823
2037		20-22-230-030-0000		$12,926		$37,560
2038		20-22-230-031-0000		$22,728		$66,043
2039		20-22-230-032-0000		$28,077		$81,586
2040		20-22-230-033-0000		$20,809		$60,467
2041		20-22-230-034-0000		$20,714		$60,191
2042		20-22-230-035-0000		$0		$0
2043		20-22-230-040-0000		$0		$0
2044		20-22-230-041-0000		$5,940		$17,260
2045		20-22-230-042-0000		$5,940		$17,260
2046		20-22-230-043-0000		$19,429		$56,457
2047		20-22-230-044-0000		$0		$0
2048		20-22-230-046-0000		$27,260		$79,212
2049		20-22-230-047-0000		$3,494		$10,153
2050		20-22-230-049-0000		$4,620		$13,425
2051		20-22-230-050-0000		$924		$2,685
2052		20-22-230-051-0000		$1,848		$5,370
2053		20-22-230-052-0000		$4,290		$12,466
2054		20-22-230-053-0000		$15,604		$45,342
2055		20-22-231-001-0000		$4,660		$13,541
2056		20-22-231-002-0000		$23,552		$68,437
2057		20-22-231-003-0000		$23,394		$67,978
2058		20-22-231-006-0000		$13,289		$38,615
No.	PIN		2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
2059	20-22-231-007-0000		$24,129		$70,114
2060	20-22-231-008-0000		$2,330		$6,771
2061	20-22-231-009-0000		$23,912		$69,483
2062	20-22-231-010-0000		$21,262		$61,783
2063	20-22-231-011-0000		$21,931		$63,727
2064	20-22-231-012-0000		$25,153		$73,090
2065	20-22-231-013-0000		$0		$0
2066	20-22-231-014-0000		$2,254		$6,550
2067	20-22-231-015-0000		$2,254		$6,550
2068	20-22-231-016-0000		$0		$0
2069	20-22-231-017-0000		$0		$0
2070	20-22-231-018-0000		$0		$0
2071	20-22-231-019-0000		$0		$0
2072	20-22-231-020-0000		$5,916		$17,191
2073	20-22-231-021-0000		$5,702		$16,569
2074	20-22-231-022-0000		$5,702		$16,569
2075	20-22-231-037-0000		$17,487		$50,814
2076	20-22-400-002-0000		$5,148		$14,959
2077	20-22-400-003-0000		$6,385		$18,554
2078	20-22-400-004-0000		$14,950		$43,442
2079	20-22-400-005-0000		$49,475		$143,764
2080	20-22-400-006-0000		$14,597		$42,416
2081	20-22-400-007-0000		$14,920		$43,355
2082	20-22-400-008-0000		$15,113		$43,915
2083	20-22-400-009-0000		$11,421		$33,187
2084	20-22-4OO-O10-0000		$2,306		$6,70!
2085	20-22-400-011-0000		$2,284		$6,637
2086	20-22-400-012-0000		$23,687		$68,830
2087	20-22-400-013-0000		$0		$0
2088	20-22-400-016-0000		$3,752		$10,903
2089	20-22-400-017-0000		$2,750		$7,991
2090	20-22-400-018-0000		$2,750		$7,991
2091	20-22-400-0)9-0000		$23,284		$67,659
2092	20-22-400-022-0000		$4,716		$13,704
2093	20-22-400-023-0000		$4,210		$12,233
2094	20-22-400-024-0000		$3,653		$10,615
2095	20-22-400-025-0000		$8,250		$23,973
2096	20-22-400-026-0000		$8,250		$23,973
2097	20-22-400-027-0000		$2,200		$6,393
2098	20-22-400-028-0000		$11,079		$32,193
2099	20-22-400-029-0000		$11,912		$34,614
2100	20-22-400-030-0000		$10,117		$29,398
2101	20-22-400-031-0000		$14,739		$42,829
2102	20-22-400-032-0000		$27,008		$78,480
2103	20-22-400-033-0000		$13,661		$39,696
2104	20-22-400-034-0000		. $9,489		$27,573

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107405

Append/x 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 24 of 25)

No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
2105		20-22-400-035-0000	$37,999		$110,417
2106		20-22-400-036-0000	$12,690		$36,875
2107		20-22-400-037-0000	$7,840		$22,781
2108		20-22-400-038-0000	$7,853		$22,819
2109		20-22-401-005-0000	$22,472		$65,299
2110		20-22-401-006-0000	$2,387		$6,936
2111		20-22-401-007-0000	$23,903		$69,457
2112		20-22-401-008-0000	$21,064		$61,208
2113		20-22-401-009-0000	$16,580		$48,178
2114		20-22-401-010-0000	$14,928		$43,378
2115		20-22-401-011-0000	$16,636		$48,341
2116		20-22-401-012-0000	$16,467		$47,850-
2117		20-22-401-013-0000	$16,322		$47,428
2118		20-22-401-016-0000	$1,241		$3,606
2119		20-22-401-017-0000	$0		$0
2120		20-22-401-018-0000	$30,961		$89,966
2121		20-22-401-019-0000	$3,150		$9,153
2122		20-22-401-020-0000	$23,716		$68,914
2123		20-22-401-021-0000	$27,773		$80,703
2124		20-22-401-022-0000	$29,410		$85,460
2125		20-22-401-023-0000	. $0		$0
2126		20-22-401-024-0000	$23,557		$68,452
2127		20-22-401-025-0000	$2,387		$6,936
2128		20-22-401-026-0000	$1,748		$5,079
2129		20-22-401-027-0000	$2,387		$6,936
2130		20-22-401-028-0000	$15,075		$43,805
2131		20-22-401-029-0000	$19,823		$57,602
2132		20-22-401-030-0000	$0		$0
2133		20-22-401-031-0000	$22,468		$65,288
2134		20-22-401-032-0000	$22,673		$65,883
2135		20-22-401-033-0000	$15,059		$43,758
2136		20-22-401-034-0000	$15,059		$43,758
2137		20-22-401-035-0000	$15,343		$44,584
2138		20-22-401-036-0000	$24,560		$71,366
2139		20-22-401-037-0000	$29,560		$85,895
2140		20-22-401-038-0000	$25,254		$73,383
2141		20-22-401-039-0000	$12,077		$35,093
2142		20-22-401-044-0000	$5,500		$15,982
2143		20-22-401-045-0000	$7,393		$21,483
2144		20-22-401-046-0000	$149,747		$435,135
2145		20-22-401-047-0000	$60,966		$177,155
2146		20-22-401-048-0000	$33,416		$97,100
2147		20-22-401-049-1001	$18,199		$52,883
2148		20-22-401-049-1002	$23,398		$67,990
2149		20-22-401-049-1003	$23,398		$67,990
2150		20-22-401-050-1001	$25,201		$73,229
No.	PIN			2008 Proposed AV		2008 Proposed EAV
2151	20-22-401-050-1002			$25,201		$73,229
2152	20-22-401-050-1003			$36,498		$106,056
2153	20-22-402-002-0000			$2,387		$6,936
2154	20-22-402-003-0000			$2,387		$6,936
2155	20-22-402-004-0000			$0		$0
2156	20-22-402-005-0000			$15,073		$43,799
2157	20-22-402-006-0000			$21,157		$61,478
2158	20-22-402-007-0000			$0		$0
2159	20-22-402-008-0000			$0		$0
2160	20-22-402-009-0000			$12,335		$35,843
2161	20-22-402-013-0000			$3,580		$10,403
2162	20-22-402-014-0000			$14,551		$42,282
2163	20-22-402-015-0000			$2,387		$6,936
2164	20-22-402-016-0000			$0		$0
2165	20-22-402-017-0000			$0		$0
2166	20-22-402-018-0000			$2,387		$6,936
2167	20-22-402-019-0000			$15,179		$44,107
2168	20-22-402-020-0000			$8,974		$26,077
2169	20-22-402-021-0000			$8,795		$25,557
2170	20-22-402-023-0000			$12,639		$36,726
2171	20-22-402-024-0000			$12,385		$35,988
2172	20-22-402-025-0000			$16,721		$48,588
21.73	20-22-402-026-0000			$22,674		$65,886
2174	2,0-22-402-027-0000			$46,257		$134,414
2175	20-22-402-028-0000			$22,460'		$65,264
2176	20-22-402-029-0000			$1,626		$4,725
2177	20-22-402-030-0000			$21,371		$62,100
2178	20-22-402-033-0000			$13,111		$38,098
2179	20-22-402-034-0000			$12,534		$36,421
2180	20-22-402-035-0000			$24,573		$71i404
2181	20-22-402-036-0000			$23,800		$69,158
2182	20-22-402-037-0000			$2,387		$6,936
2183	20-22-402-038-0000			$23,800		$69,158
2184	20-22-402-039-0000			$26,548		$77,143
2185	20-22-402-040-0000			$24,772		$71,982
2186	20-22-402-041-0000			$26,469		$76,914
2187	20-22-402-042-0000			$3,150		$9,153
2188	20-22-402-043-0000			$0		$0
2189	20-22-402-044-0000			$22,599		$65,668
2190	20-22-402-046-0000			$15,642		$45,453
2191	20-22-402-047-0000			$15,963		$46,385
2192	20-22-402-049-0000			$15,048		$43,726
2193	20-22-402-051-0000			$27,147		$78,884
2194	20-22-402-052-0000			$70,179		$203,926
2195	20-22-403-001-0000			$0		$0
2196	20-22-403-002-0000			$0		$0

107406

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Appendix 2.

(To West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area TIF District Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project)

Summary Of Estimated 2008 Equalized Assessed Value. (By Permanent Index Number) (Page 25 of 25)

No.	PIN			2008 Proposed AV	2008 Proposed EAV
2197	20-22-403-003-0000			$1,980	$5,753
2198	20-22-403-005-0000			$23,129	$67,208
2199	20-22-403-006-0000			$3,949	$11,475
2200	20-22-403-007-0000			$14,784	$42,959
2201	20-22-403-008-0000			$10,757	$31,258
2202	20-22-403-009-0000			$12,923	$37,552
2203	20-22-403-010-0000			$12,460	$36,206
2204	20-22-403-011-0000			$32,075	$93,204
2205	20-22-403-012-0000			$20,900	$60,731
2206	20-22-403-013-0000			$14,509	$42,160
2207	20-22-403-014-0000			$16,528	$48,027
2208	20-22-403-015-0000			$26,224	$76,202
2209	20-22-403-016-0000			$15,492	$45,017
2210	20-22-403-017-0000			$17,500	$50,852
2211	20-22-403-021-0000			$15,818	$45,964
2212	20-22-403-022-0000			$14,336	$41,658
2213	20-22-403-023-0000			$11,989	$34,838
2214	20-22-403-024-0000			$12,516	$36,369
2215	20-22-403-025-0000			$12,516	$36,369
2216	20-22-403-026-0000			$16,379	$47,594
2217	20-22-403-027-0000			$10,330	$30,075
2218	20-22-403-028-0000			$7,644	$22,212
2219	20-22-403-029-0000			$13,595	$39,504
2220	20-22-403-030-0000			$24,467	$71,096
2221	20-22-403-031-0000			$24,440	$71,018
2222	20-22-403-032-0000			$25,186	$73,185
2223	20-22-403-033-0000			$23,667	$68,772
2224	20-22-403-034-0000			$25,999	$75,548
2225	20-22-403-035-0000			$22,276	$64,730
2226	20-22-403-036-0000			$30,044	$87,302
2227	20-22-403-037-0000			$9,236	$26,838
2228	20-22-403-038-0000			$9,128	$26,524
2229	20-22-403-039-0000			$32,626	$94,805
2230	20-22-403-040-0000			$34,226	$99,454
2231	20-22-403-041-0000			$20,766	$60,342
2232	20-22-406-001-0000			$0	$0
2233	2O-22-406-002-0O00			$0	$0
2234	20-22-406-003-0000			$35,827	$104,106
2235	20-22-406-004-0000			$21,248	$61,742
2236	20-22-406-005-0000			$0	$0
2237	20-22-406-006-0000			$15,486	' $44,999
2238	20-22-406-007-0000			$17,926	$52,089
2239	20-22-406-008-0000			$1,684	$4,893
2240	20-22-406-009-0000			$38,827	$112,823
2241	20-22-406-010-0000			$43,076	$125,170
2242	20-22-406-011-0000			$20,307	$59,008
No.		PIN	2008 Proposed AV			2008 Proposed EAV
2243		20-22-406-012-0000	$3,522			$10,234
2244		20-22-406-013-0000	$2,348			$6,823
2245		20-22-406-014-0000	$0			$0
2246		20-22-406-015-0000	$2,348			$6,823
2247		20-22-406-016-0000	$2,348			$6,823
2248		20-22-406-017-0000	$4,697			$13,649
2249		20-22-406-018-0000	$31,680			$92,056
2250		20-22-406-031-0000	$0			$0
2251		20-22-406-032-0000	$22,132			$64,311
2252		20-22-406-033-0000	$22,132			$64,311
2253		20-22-406-034-0000	$0			$0
2254		20-22-406-035-0000	$4,022			$11,687
2255		20-22-406-036-0000	$4,393			$12,765
2256		20-22-406-037-0000	$0			$0
2257		20-22-406-038-0000	$0			$o'
2258		20-22-406-039-0000	$0			$0
2259		20-22-409-001-0000	$27,074			$78,672
2260		20-22-409-002-0000	$27,746			$80,624
2261		20-22-409-003-0000	$23,423			$68,063
2262		20-22-409-004-0000	$22,210			$64,538
2263		20-22-409-005-0000	$22,648			$65,811
2264		20-22-409-006-0000	$71,193			$206,873
2265		20-22-409-010-0000	$21,202			$61,609
2266		20-22-409-011-0000	$2,387			$6,936
2267		20-22-409-012-0000	$22,845			$66,383
2268		20-22-409-013-0000	$2,165			$6,291
2269		20-22-409-014-0000	$8,613			$25,028
2270		20-22-409-015-0000	$8,613			$25,028
2271		20-22-409-016-0000	$8,613			$25,028
2272		20-22-409-017-0000	$17,227			$50,058
2273		20-22-409-018-0000	$17,227			$50,058
2274		20-22-409-019-0000	$8,613			$25,028
2275		20-22-409-020-0000	$8,613			$25,028
2276		20-22-409-021-0000	$8,613			$25,028
2277		20-22-409-022-0000	$8,613			$25,028
2278		20-22-409-023-0000	$8,577			$24,923
2279		20-22-409-024-0000	$7,236			$21,026
2280		20-22-409-025-0000	$5,436			$15,796
2281		20-22-409-026-0000	$29,478			$85,657
2282		20-22-409-027-0000	$28,176			$81,874
2283		20-22-409-030-0000	$22,899			$66,540
2284		20-22-409-031-0000	$18,496			$53,746
		Total	$49,082,288			$142,623,312

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107407

West Wood/awn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1.

July 1, 2010.

Introduction To Amendment No. 1.

The City of Chicago (the "City") is dedicated to the continued growth and economic development of the City. The City's ability to stimulate growth and development relies on the creation and implementation of government policies that will allow the City to work with the private sector to eliminate blighted areas and ensure sound growth and development of property. Based upon the City's establishment of a redevelopment project area as described herein, it is understood that the City recognizes the> necessity of the relationship between continued community growth and public participation. The blighting of communities impairs the value of private investment and threatens the growth of the City's tax base. Additionally, the City understands the dangers associated with blighting factors and problems arising from blighted conditions. Both of these statements are supported by the City's establishment of a redevelopment project area.

The Illinois General Assembly passed the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et. seq.) (the "Act") to address the growing number of blighted areas in many Illinois municipalities. The Act declares that in order to promote the public health, safety, morals, and welfare, blighting and/or conservation conditions must be eliminated.

Therefore, to induce redevelopment pursuant to the Act, the City Council adopted three ordinances in May 2010 approving the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project (the "Plan"), designating the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "Area"), and adopting Tax Increment Allocation Financing for the Area.

The Plan is solely being amended to include, within the Area, the John Foster Dulles Elementary School located on the Southwest corner of 63^rd Street and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive. The amendments to the Plan are outlined below and follow the format of the Plan.

Laube Consulting Group LLC ("Consultant") has been engaged to prepare this Amendment Number 1 to the Plan in order to assist the City in determining whether or not the addition of the John Foster Dulles Elementary School qualifies underthe Act. The Consultant conducted various surveys of existing conditions and land uses. In conducting these surveys, conditions were documented and tabulated by the types of blighting factors delineated in the Act. An analysis was made of each of the blighting factors that are present.

107408

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Executive Summary.

No changes.

/nfroducf/on.

The Study Area.

The last sentence of the third paragraph should be amended and replaced as follows: The Area consists of 2,285 tax parcels on 64 blocks, and is wholly located within the City.

Map 1 Community Context. This map is to be amended and replaced with Amended Map 1 as shown in the Appendix.

Map 2 - RPA Boundary. This map is to be amended and replaced with Amended Map 2 as shown in the Appendix.

History of Community Area. No changes.

Existing Land-Use. No changes.

Historically Significant Structures. No changes.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107409

Map 3 -- Existing Land-Use. This map is to be amended with Amended Map 3 as shown in the Appendix.

Eligibility Analysis.

Provisions Of The Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act. No changes.

Factors For Improved Property. No changes.

Factors For Vacant Land. No changes.

Methodology Overview And Determination Of Eligibility. No changes.

Conservation Area Findings.

The second paragraph, last sentence is amended and replaced as follows:

There are 1,498 buildings located within the Area, 1,425 (95%) are 35 years of age or older.

Map 4A -- Eligibility Factor (35+ Years). This map to be amended and replaced with Amended Map 4A as shown in the Appendix.

Map 4B - Eligibility Factor (Deterioration). This map to be amended and replaced with Amended Map 4B as shown in the Appendix.

107410

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Map 4C - Eligibility Factor (Inadequate Utilities). This map to be amended and replaced with Amended Map 4C as shown in the Appendix.

Map 4D - Eligibility Factor (Structures Below Minimum Code). This map to be amended and replaced with Amended Map 4D as shown in the Appendix.

Map 4E - Eligibility Factor (Lack Of Community Planning). This map to be amended and replaced with Amended Map 4E as shown in the Appendix.

This section is to be added to Conservation Area Findings:

We have evaluated Parcel 20-22-108-017 ("Parcel 017"), commonly known as John Foster Dulles Elementary School for inclusion in the Area. An analysis was made of each of the blighting factors listed in the Act to determine whether each or any are present in the ' Area and, if so, to what extent.

Our findings are as follows:

Age (35+ Years) ~ Present.

The structure on Parcel 017 is over 35 years of age. The structure was constructed in 1962, making it approximately 48 years old.

As such, there are 1,498 buildings located within the Area, 1,425 (95%) are 35 years of age or older when Parcel 017 is included.

Therefore, our conclusion is that Age 35+ years is present to a major extent.

Deterioration -- Present To A Minor Extent.

Parcel 017 exhibits the following factors: cracked sidewalks, soffits, parking lots and driveways, rusted metal grating on the doors and over the windows, limited water damage under the eaves, chipped paint on the windows, rusty fences, and other items of deterioration. These items are repairable and minor in nature.

Therefore, our conclusion is that deterioration is present to a minor extent.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107411

Inadequate Utilities -- Present To A Major Extent.

A review of the City's Water and Sewer atlases found that inadequate utilities affect all properties on both sides of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive. The water and sewer lines were largely installed prior to 1909. All of these lines have surpassed their 100-year service lives and are in need of replacement or significant repair and have been deemed inadequate by the City's Water Management department. Parcel 017 is served by these water and sewer lines that go in and along Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive.

Therefore, our conclusion is that inadequate utilities are present to a major extent.

Lack Of Community Planning - Present To A Major Extent.

Lack of community planning was assessed as an area-wide factor in the Plan. The Plan cited many instances of incompatible land-use relationships, improper subdivisions, or inadequate land platting. '

Parcel 017 also evidences lack of community planning due to the fact that it contains an elementary school and is directly adjacent to 63^rd Street and adjacent to a heavily trafficked commercial corridor. There is a Walgreens directly to the south and an industrial rail storage yard directly adjacent to the east of Parcel 017. Additionally, it is directly adjacent to the Chicago Transportation Authority's elevated train line which is directly over 63^rrl Street. Parcel 017 is "land-locked" and there is no room for expansion. The proximity of the commercial uses, 63^rd Street, and the rail storage yard directly surrounding an elementary school is evidence that this school was developed without community planning in mind.

Therefore, our conclusion is that lack, of community planning is present to a major extent.

Deleterious Land-Use Or Layout -- Present To A Major Extent.

Parcel 017, an elementary school, is directly adjacent to a Walgreens to the south and a rail storage yard to the east. The vehicular entrance to the school is at two (2) points: (1) a curb cut off of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the east and (2) a street entrance off of the intersection of 63^rd and Calumet Avenue to the west. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive is a major thoroughfare that is heavily trafficked. 63^rd Street is also a major thoroughfare that also has the truck and commercial traffic from the industrial uses directly to the west ofthe site. Therefore, the land uses of commercial to the south, the major thoroughfares of 63^rdStreet and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, and the industrial uses to the east create an improper and unsafe interaction of land uses for an elementary school. Additionally, the parcel is very irregularly shaped. It is an "L" shape conforming itself around the commercial use to the south and the irregular intersection at the corner of 63^rd and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive. This creates a very unusual traffic pattern for parking of the school as well as access to the playground for the children.

Therefore, our conclusion is that deleterious land-use or layout is present to a major extent.

107412

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Overall Conclusion.

Based on the Consultant's review of Parcel 017, the Consultant believes that a sufficient basis exists for the inclusion of Parcel 017 in the Area.

Specifically, ninety-five percent (95%) of the buildings in the Area are thirty-five (35) years or greater and Parcel 017 exhibits 4 of 13 blighting factors necessary to qualify as a Conservation Area under the Act.

The Area, on an overall basis exhibits six (6) of thirteen (13) factors, four (4) to a major extent and two (2) to a minor extent. The inclusion of Parcel 017 adds to these factors.

Therefore, it is the Consultant's conclusion that, with the inclusion of Parcel 017, the conservation factors are evenly distributed throughout the Area as required by the Act.

f?edeve/opmen( Plan And Project.

Redevelopment Needs Of The West Woodlawn RPA. No changes.

Goal, Objectives, And Strategies.

This goal is to be added to this section:

12. Improve public facilities within the Area, including the encouragement of upgrades to Chicago Public School facilities.

Proposed Future Land-Use. No changes.

Map 5 -- Proposed Future Land-Use. This map is to be amended and replaced by Amended Map 5 as shown in the Appendix.

Assessment Of Housing Impact. No changes.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107413

Financial Plan.

Eligible Costs. No changes.

Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs. No changes.

Phasing And Scheduling Of The Redevelopment. No changes.

Sources Of Funds To Pay Costs. No changes.

Issuance Of Obligations. No changes.

Most Recent Equalized Assessed Valuation Of Properties In The Redevelopment Project Area.

The reference to 2,284 parcels in the second sentence should be amended and replaced with 2,285.

Anticipated Equalized Assessed Value. No changes due to the tax-exempt status of Parcel 017.

Required Findings And Tests.

Lack Of Growth And Private Investment. No changes.

107414

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Conformance To The Plans Of The City. No changes.

Dates Of Completion. No changes.

Financial Impact Of The Redevelopment Project. No changes.

Demand On Taxing District Services And Program To Address Financial And Service Impact. No changes.

Map 6 Community Facilities. Map 6 is amended and replaced with Amended Map 6 as shown in the Appendix.

Provisions For Amending Redevelopment Plan And Project.

No changes.

Commitment To Fair Employment Practices And Affirmative Action Plan.

No changes.

Appendix 1 Boundary And Legal Description. West Woodlawn TIF Legal Description.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107415

The legal description is amended and replaced as follows:

West Woodlawn TIF Legal Description.

All that part of the southwest quarter of Section 14, the southeast quarter of Section 15, the southwest quarter of Section 15, the northeast quarter of Section 22, the northwest quarter of Section 22, the southeast quarter of Section 22, the southwest quarter of Section 22 and the southwest quarter of Section 23| all in Township 38 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows:

beginning at the intersection of the north line of East 60^th Street, 66 feet wide, and the west line of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, 66 feet wide, said intersection being in the southwest quarter of Section 15, Township 38, North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence east along said north line of East 60^,h Street to the northerly extension of the east line of South Drexel Avenue; thence south along the northerly extension of said east line of South Drexel Avenue and along said east line to the north line of East 62^nd Street; thence west along said north line of East 62^hd Street to the west line of South Cottage Grove Avenue; thence south along said west .line of South Cottage Grove Avenue to the south line of the 16 foot alley, vacated by ordinance passed September 11, 1968 and recorded October 28,1968 as Document 20658363, lying south of and adjoining Lot 18 in Block 2 ofthe resubdivision of the Washington Park Club Addition to Chicago, being a subdivision of the south half of the southeast quarter of said Section 15; thence west along the south line of said vacated 16 foot alley to the west line of said Lot 18 extended south; thence north along said southerly extension of the west line of Lot 18 to the easterly extension of the north line of the 16 foot public alley lying south of and adjoining Lot 25 in Block 2 of the resubdivision of the Washington Park Club Addition to Chicago aforesaid; thence west along the easterly extension ofthe north line ofthe said 16 foot public alley, along said north line and along the westerly extension thereof, to the west line of South Evans Avenue; thence south along said west line of South Evans Avenue to the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 8 in Block 1 of Loring and Gibbs Subdivision of part of the northeast quarter of Section 22 aforesaid; thence east along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 8 and along said north line to the west line of the 16 foot public alley lying east of said South Evans Avenue; thence south along said west line of the 16 foot public alley lying east of said South Evans Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 14 in Block 1 in A.J. Hawhe's South Park Subdivision of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter and the north three-quarters of the east half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 22; thence east along said westerly extension of the south line of Lot 14, along said south line and along the easterly extension thereof to the east line of South Cottage Grove Avenue; thence south along said east line of South Cottage Grove Avenue to the easterly extension ofthe south line of East 68^lh Street; thence west along said easterly extension of the south line of East 68^,h Street and along said south line to the west line of South Evans Avenue; thence north along said west line of South Evans Avenue to the south line of East 67^lh Street; thence west along said south line of East 67^th Street

107416 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

to the east line of South Champlain Avenue; thence south along said east line of South Champlain Avenue to the south line of East 68^th Street; thence west along said south line of East 68^th Street to the east line of South St. Lawrence Avenue; thence south along said east line of South'St. Lawrence Avenue to the north line of East 69^,h Street; thence southwesterly to the intersection of the west line of South St. Lawrence Avenue and the southwesterly line of South Chicago Avenue; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line of South Chicago Avenue to the intersection with the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the south line of East Marquette Road; thence west along said south line of East Marquette Road to a line perpendicular to the north line of East Marquette Road at a point 75.46 feet east of the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive as measured along said north line of East Marquette Road; thence north along said perpendicular line to the north line of East Marquette Road, being also the south line of Block 4 in L.C.P. Freer's Subdivision of the east half of the northwest quarter of said Section 22 (except part occupied by railroad); thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge pursuant to ordinance passed by City Council June 16,1955, a distance of 464.82 feet as measured along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 1,597.28 feet and whose chord has an angle of 63 degrees, 16 minutes, 30 seconds to the right with the westerly extension of the south line of said Block 4; thence continuing northwesterly along said southwesterly line, being a straight line having an angle of 09 degrees, 19 minutes, 35 seconds to the left with the extension ofthe aforesaid chord to a line 140 feet south of and parallel with the north line of said Block 4; thence east along the south line of the north 140 feet of Block 4 to the intersection with a line 350 feet northeasterly from and parallel with the northeasterly right-of-way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad; thence northwesterly along said line 350 feet northeasterly from and parallel with the northeasterly right-of-way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad to the point of intersection with the centerline of South Calumet Avenue; thence north along said centerline of South Calumet Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of Block 3 in L.C.P. Freer's Subdivision of the east half of the northwest quarter of said Section 22; thence east along said westerly extension of the south line of Block 3 and along the south line thereof to the intersection with the northeasterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge to the intersection with the west line of South Calumet Avenue; thence north along said west line of South Calumet Avenue to the north line of East 63^rd Street; thence east along said north line to its intersection with the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (50 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15) to the south line of Lot 9 in the subdivision of Lots 6 and 12 in Wilson, Heald and Stebbin's Subdivision ofthe east half of the southwest quarter of said Section 15; thence east along said south line of Lot 9 to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (33 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107417

Lot 1 in the subdivision of Lots 6 and 12 in Wilson, Heald and Stebbin's Subdivision aforesaid; thence west along said north line of Lot 1 to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (50 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of East 61^st Street; thence east along said north line of East 61^s'Street to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (33 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of East 60^,h Street and the point of beginning.

Original legal description for West Woodlawn TIF, dated December 28, 2009, was prepared by Nakawatase Wyns & Associates, Inc., James E. Rores, Illinois Professional Land Surveyor Number 2394, license expires November 30, 2010.

This amended legal description for West Woodlawn TIF, dated June 29, 2010, was amended by Spaceco, Inc., C. Brian Lounsbury, Illinois Professional Land Surveyor Number 2831, license expires November 30, 2010.

Appendix 2 -- Summary Of Equalized Assessed Value By Property Index Number (PIN). This PIN is to be added to the list:

Number PIN 2008 AV 2008 EAV

2,285 20-22-108-017 $0 $0

Appendix 3 -- Housing Impact Study. No changes.

[Amended Map 2 referred to in the West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment Number 1 constitutes Exhibit "E" to ordinance and printed on page 107435 of this Journal.}

[Amended Maps 1, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 5 and 6 referred to in this West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment Number 1 printed on pages 107418 through 107426 of this Journal.]

107418

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

/Amended Map 1. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan Ahd Project Amendment No. 1)

Commun/fy Context.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107419

/Amended Map 3. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1)

Existing Land-Use.

107420

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Amended Map 4A. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1)

Eligibility Factor. ~ Age (35+ Years).

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107421

Amended Map 4B. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1)

Eligibility Factor. - Deterioration.

107422

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Amended Map 4C. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1)

Eligibility Factor Inadequate Utilities.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107423

-Amended Map 4D. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1)

Eligibility Factor- Structures Below Minimum Code.

107424

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Amended Map 4E. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1)

Eligibility Factor- Lack Of Community Planning.

Legend

f-. J W«i Woodlawn RPA Boundary

Lack or Community Planning

» WO IMFM

I I I I I

City of Chicago

West Woodlawn

Hax Increment Finance District

July 1010

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107425

A mended Map 5. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1)

Proposed Future Land-Use.

107426

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Amended Map 6. (To West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan And Project Amendment No. 1)

Community Facilities.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OP COMMITTEES

107427

Exhibit "B". (To Ordinance)

Certificate.

State of Illinois )

)SS.

County of Cook )

I, Robert Wolf, the duly authorized and qualified Assistant Secretary of the Community Development Commission ofthe City of Chicago, and the custodian of the records thereof, do hereby certify that I have compared the attached copy of a Resolution adopted by the Community Development Commission of the City of Chicago at a Regular Meeting held on the 14^,h day of September 2010 with the original resolution adopted at said meeting and noted in the minutes of the Commission, and do hereby certify that said copy is a true, correct and complete transcript of said Resolution.

Dated this 14^,h day of September 2010.

(Signed):_Robert Wolf

Assistant Secretary

Resolution 10-CDC-52 referred to in this Certificate reads as follows:

Community Development Commission Of The City Of Chicago

Resolution 10-CDC-52

Recommending To The City Council Of The City Of Chicago

For The Proposed West Woodlawn Amendment No. 1 Redevelopment Project Area:

Approval Of Amendment No. 1 To The Redevelopment Plan And Project

Whereas, The Community Development Commission (the "Commission") of the City of Chicago (the "City") has heretofore been appointed by the Mayor ofthe City with the approval

107428 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

of its City Council ("City Council", referred to herein collectively with the Mayor as the "Corporate Authorities") (as codified in Section 2-124 of the City's Municipal Code) pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, as amended (65 ILCS 51/174.4-1, et seq.) (the "Act"); and

Whereas, The Commission is empowered by the Corporate Authorities to exercise certain powers set forth in Section 5/11-74.4-4(k) of the Act, including the holding of certain public hearings required by the Act; and

Whereas, Staff of the City's Department of Community Development has conducted or caused to be conducted certain investigations, studies and surveys of the [insert name] Redevelopment Project Area Amendment No.1, the street boundaries of which are described on (Sub)Exhibit A hereto (the "Area"), to determine the eligibility of the Area as a redevelopment project area as defined in the Act (a "Redevelopment Project Area") and for tax increment allocation financing pursuant to the Act ("Tax Increment Allocation Financing"), and previously has presented the following documents to the Commission for its review:

West Woodlawn Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment No.1 (the "Plan"); and

Whereas, Prior to the adoption by the Corporate Authorities of ordinances approving a redevelopment plan, designating an area as a Redevelopment Project Area or adopting Tax Increment Allocation Financing for an area, it is necessary that the Commission hold a public hearing (the "Hearing") pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(a) ofthe Act, convene a meeting of a joint review board (the "Board") pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-5(b) of the Act, set the dates of such Hearing and Board meeting and give notice thereof pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-6 of the Act; and

Whereas, A public meeting (the "Public Meeting") was held in accordance and in compliance with the requirements of Section 5/11-74.4-6(e) of the Act, on June 28, 2010 at 6:00 P.M. at the Dulles Elementary School, 6311 South Calumet, Chicago, Illinois (this date-being more than 14 business days before the scheduled mailing of the notice ofthe Hearing [hereinafter defined] as specified in the Act), pursuant to notice from the City's Commissioner ofthe Department of Community Development, given on June 11,2010 (this date being more than 15 days before the date of the Public Meeting, as specified in the Act); by certified mail to all taxing districts having real property in the proposed Area and to all entities requesting that information that have taken the steps necessary to register to be included on the interested parties registry for the proposed Area in accordance with Section 5/11-74.4-4.2 of the Act and, with a good faith effort by regular mail, to all residents and to the last known persons who paid property taxes on real estate in the proposed Area (which good faith effort was satisfied by such notice being mailed to each residential address and to the person or persons in whose name property taxes were paid on real property for the last preceding year located in the proposed Area); and

Whereas, The Report and Plan were made available for public inspection and review since July 1, 2010, being a date not less than 10 days before the Commission meeting at which the

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107429

Commission adopted Resolution 10-CDC-46 on July 13, 2010 fixing the time and place for the Hearing, at City Hall, 121 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, in the following offices: City Clerk, Room 107 and Department of Community Development, Room 1000; and

Whereas, Notice of the availability of the Report and Plan, including how to obtain this information, were sent by mail on July 30, 2010 which is within a reasonable time after the adoption by the Commission of Resolution 10-CDC-46 to: (a) all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, were determined to be (i) located within the Area and (ii) located outside the proposed Area and within 750 feet of the boundaries of the Area (or, if applicable, were determined to be the 750 residential addresses that were outside the proposed Area and closest to the boundaries of the Area); and (b) organizations and residents that were registered interested parties for such Area; and

Whereas, Notice ofthe Hearing by publication was given at least twice, the first publication being on August 21, 2010 a date which is not more than 30 nor less than 10 days prior to the Hearing, and the second publication being-on August 28, 2010 both in the C/7/cago Sun-Times or the Ch/cago Tribune, being newspapers of general circulation within the taxing districts having property in the Area; and

Whereas, Notice of the Hearing was given by mail to taxpayers by depositing such notice in the United States mail by certified mail addressed to the persons in whose names the general taxes for the last preceding year were paid on each lot, block, tract or parcel of land lying within the Area, on August 31,2010 being a date not less than 10 days prior to the date set for the Hearing; and where taxes for the last preceding year were not paid, notice was also mailed to the persons last listed on the tax rolls as the owners of such property within the preceding three years; and

Whereas, Notice of the Hearing was given by mail to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs ("DCCA") and members of the Board (including notice of the convening ofthe Board), by depositing such notice in the United States mail by certified mail addressed to DCCA and all Board members, on July 16, 2010 being a date not less than 45 days prior to the date set for the Hearing; and

Whereas, Notice of the Hearing and copies of the Report and Plan were sent by mail to taxing districts having taxable property in the Area, by depositing such notice and documents in the United States mail by certified mail addressed to all taxing districts having taxable property within the Area, on July 16,2010 being a date not less than 45 days prior to the date set for the Hearing; and

Whereas, The Hearing was held on September 14,2010 at 1:00 P.M. at City Hall, 2^nd Floor, 121 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, as the official public hearing, and testimony was heard from all interested persons or representatives of any affected taxing district present at the Hearing and wishing to testify, concerning the Commission's recommendation to City Council regarding approval of the Plan, designation ofthe Area as a Redevelopment Project Area and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area; and

107430

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Whereas, The Board meeting was convened on August 6,2010 at 10:00 A.M. (being a date at least 14 days but not more than 28 days after the date of the mailing of the notice to the taxing districts on July 16,2010 in Room 1003A, City Hall, 121 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, to review the matters properly coming before the Board to allow it to provide its advisory recommendation regarding the approval of the Plan, designation of the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area, adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area and other matters, if any, properly before it, all in accordance with Section 5/11-74.4-5(b) of the Act; and

Whereas, The Commission has reviewed the Report and Plan, considered testimony from the Hearing, if any, the recommendation of the Board, if any, and such other matters or studies as the Commission deemed necessary or appropriate in making the findings set forth herein and formulating its decision whether to recommend to City Council approval of the Plan, designation of the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area; now, therefore,

Be It Resolved by the Community Development Commission of the City of Chicago:

Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

Section 2. The Commission ■ hereby makes the following findings pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(n) of the Act or such other section as is referenced herein:

a. The Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be expected to be developed without the adoption of the Plan;

b. The Plan:

(i) conforms to the comprehensive plan for the development of the City as a whole; or

(ii) the Plan either (A) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the Chicago Plan Commission or (B) includes land uses that have been approved by the Chicago Plan Commission;

c. The Plan meets all of the requirements of a redevelopment plan as defined in the Act and, as set forth in the Plan, the estimated date of completion of the projects described therein and retirement of all obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs is not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer as provided in subsection (b) of Section 5/11-74.4-8 of the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year following the year of the adoption of the ordinance approving the designation of the Area as a redevelopment project area and, as required pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-7 of the Act, no such obligation shall have a maturity date greater than 20 years;

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107431

d. To the extent required by Section 5/11-74.4-3(n) (6) ofthe Act, the Plan incorporates the housing impact study, if such study is required by Section 5/11 -74.4-3(n)(5) of the Act;

e. The Plan will not result in displacement of residents from inhabited units.

f. The Area includes only those contiguous parcels of real property and improvements thereon that are to be substantially benefited by proposed Plan improvements, as required pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-4(a) of the Act;

g. As required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(p) of the Act:

(i) the Area is not less, in the aggregate, than one and one-half acres in size; and

(ii) conditions exist in the Area that cause the Area to qualify for designation as a redevelopment project area and a blighted area as defined in the Act;

h. If the Area is qualified as a "blighted area", whether improved or vacant, each of the factors necessary to qualify the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area on that basis is (i) present, with that presence documented to a meaningful extent so that it may be reasonably found that the factor is clearly present within the intent of the Act and (ii) reasonably distributed throughout the improved part or vacant part as applicable, of the Area as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(a) of the Act;

i. If the Area is qualified as a "conservation area" the combination of the factors necessary to qualify the Area as a redevelopment project area on that basis is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare, and the Area may become a blighted area; [and]

Section 3. The Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Plan pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act.

Section 4. The Commission recommends that the City Council designate the Area as a Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act.

Section 5. The Commission recommends that the City Council adopt Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Area.

Section 6. If any provision of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution.

Section 7. All resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

107432 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Section 8. This resolution shall be effective as of the date of its adoption.

Section 9. A certified copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council.

Adopted: September 14^th, 2010.

[(Sub)Exhibit "A" referred to in this Resolution 10-CDC-52 constitutes Exhibit "D" to ordinance and printed on page 107434 of this Journal.]

Exhibit "C". (To Ordinance)

West Woodlawn Tax Increment Financing Legal Description.

All that part ofthe southwest quarter of Section 14, the southeast quarter of Section 15, the southwest quarter of Section 15, the northeast quarter of Section 22, the northwest quarter of Section 22, the southeast quarter of Section 22, the southwest quarter of Section 22 and the southwest quarter of Section 23, all in Township 38 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows:

beginning at the intersection of the north line of East 60^,h Street, 66 feet wide, and the west line of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, 66 feet wide, said intersection being in the southwest quarter of Section 15, Township 38 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence east along said north line of East 60^th Street to the northerly extension of the east line of South Drexel Avenue; thence south along the northerly extension of said east line of South Drexel Avenue and along said east line to the north line of East 62^nd Street; thence west along said north line of East 62^nd Street to the west line of South Cottage Grove Avenue; thence south along said west line of South Cottage Grove Avenue to the south line of the 16 foot alley, vacated by ordinance passed September 11, 1968 and recorded October 28, 1968 as Document 20658363, lying south of and adjoining Lot 18 in Block 2 of the resubdivision ofthe Washington Park Club Addition to Chicago, being a subdivision of the south half of the southeast quarter of said Section 15; thence west along the south line of said vacated 16 foot alley to the west line of said Lot 18 extended south; thence north along said southerly extension of the west line of Lot 18 to the easterly extension ofthe north line of the 16 foot public alley lying south of and adjoining Lot 25 in Block 2 of the resubdivision of the Washington Park Club Addition to Chicago aforesaid; thence west along the easterly extension of the north line of the said 16 foot public alley, along said north line and along the westerly extension thereof

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107433

to the west line of South Evans Avenue; thence south along said west line of South Evans Avenue to the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 8 in Block 1 of Loring and Gibbs Subdivision of part of the northeast quarter of Section 22 aforesaid; thence east along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 8 and along said north line to the west line ofthe 16 foot public alley lying east of said South Evans Avenue; thence south along said west line of the 16 foot public alley lying east of said South Evans Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 14 in Block 1 in A.J. Hawhe's South Park Subdivision of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter and the north three-quarters of the east half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 22; thence east along said westerly extension of the south line of Lot 14, along said south line and along the easterly extension thereof, to the east line of South Cottage Grove Avenue; thence south along'said east line of South Cottage Grove Avenue to the easterly extension of the south line of East 68^,h Street; thence west along said easterly extension of the south line of East 68^lh Street and along said south line to the west line of South Evans Avenue; thence north along said west line of South Evans Avenue to the south line of East 67^th Street; thence west along said south line of East 67^lh Street to the east line of South Champlain Avenue; thence south along said east line of South Champlain Avenue to the south line of East 68* Street; thence west along said south line of East 68^th Street to the east line of South St. Lawrence Avenue; thence south along said east line of South St. Lawrence Avenue to the north line of East 69^,h Street; thence southwesterly to the intersection of .the west line of South St. Lawrence Avenue and the southwesterly line of South South Chicago Avenue; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line of South South Chicago Avenue to the intersection with the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the south line of East Marquette Road; thence west along said south line of East Marquette Road to a line perpendicular to the north line of East Marquette Road at a point 75.46 feet east ofthe west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive as measured along said north line of East Marquette Road; thence north along said perpendicular line to the north line of East Marquette Road, being also the south line of Block 4 in L.C.P. Freer's Subdivision of the east half ofthe northwest quarter of said Section 22 (except part occupied by railroad); thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge pursuant to ordinance passed by City Council June 16, 1955; a distance of 464.82 feet as measured along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 1,597.28 feet and whose chord has an angle of 63 degrees, 16 minutes, 30 seconds to the right with the westerly extension of the south'line of said Block 4; thence continuing northwesterly along said southwesterly line, being a straight line having an angle of 09 degrees, 19 minutes, 35 seconds to the left with the extension of the aforesaid chord to a line 140 feet south of and parallel with the north'line of said Block 4; thence east along the south line of the north 140 feet of Block 4 to the intersection with a line 350 feet northeasterly from and parallel with the northeasterly right-of-way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad; thence northwesterly along said line 350 feet northeasterly from and parallel with the northeasterly right-of-way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad to the point of intersection with the centerline of South Calumet Avenue; thence north along said centerline of South Calumet Avenue to the westerly extension ofthe south line of Block 3 in L.C.P. Freer's Subdivision of the east

107434

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

half of the northwest quarter of said Section 22; thence east along said westerly extension of the south line of Block 3 and along the south line thereof, to the intersection with the northeasterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge to the intersection with the west line of South Calumet Avenue; thence north along said west line of South Calumet Avenue to the north line of East 63^,d Street; thence east along said north line to its intersection with the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (50 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15) to the south line of Lot 9 in the subdivision of Lots 6 and 12 in Wilson, Heald and Stebbin's Subdivision of the east half of the southwest quarter of said Section 15; thence east along said south line of Lot 9 to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (33 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of Lot 1 in the subdivision of Lots 6 and 12 in Wilson, Heald and Stebbin's Subdivision aforesaid; thence west along said north line of Lot 1 to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (50 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of East 61^st Street; thence east along said north line of East 61^st Street to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (33 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of East 60^lh Street and.the point of beginning.

Exhibit "D". (To Ordinance)

Sfreer Location Of The Expanded Area.

The Expanded Area is generally bounded by East 60^m Street on the north, South Cottage Grove Avenue on the east, East 68^lh Street and South South Chicago Avenue on the south, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive and South Calumet Avenue on the west.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107435

Exhibit "£". (To Ordinance)

Amended Map 2 - TIF Boundary.

107436

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

DESIGNATION OF EXPANDED WEST WOODLAWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT.

[02010-6165]

The Committee on Finance submitted the following report:

CHICAGO, November 17, 2010.

To me President and Members of the City Council:

Your Committee on Finance, having had under consideration an ordinance designating the expanded West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area a redevelopment project area, having had the same under advisement, begs leave to report and recommend that Your Honorable Body Pass the proposed ordinance transmitted herewith.

This recommendation was concurred in by a viva voce vote of the members of the Committee.

Respectfully submitted,

(Signed) EDWARD M. BURKE,

Chairman.

On motion of Alderman Burke, the said proposed ordinance transmitted with the foregoing committee report was Passed by yeas and nays as follows:

Yeas - Aldermen Moreno, Fioretti, Dowell, Preckwinkle, Hairston, Lyle, Jackson, Harris, Beale, Pope, Balcer, Cardenas, Olivo, Burke, Foulkes, Thompson, Thomas, Lane, Rugai, Cochran, Brookins, Munoz, Zaiewski, Dixon, Solis, Maldonado, Burnett, E. Smith, Graham, Reboyras, Suarez, Waguespack, Mell, Austin, Colon, Rice, Mitts, Allen, Laurino, O'Connor, Doherty, Reilly, Daley, Tunney, Levar, Shiller, Schulter, M. Smith, Moore, Stone - 50.

Nays - None.

Alderman Pope moved to reconsider the foregoing vote. The motion was lost. The following is said ordinance as passed:

WHEREAS, The City of Chicago (the "City") by an ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City (the "City Council") on May 12, 2010, approved a redevelopment plan and project (the "Original Plan") for a portion of the City known as the West Woodlawn Redevelopment

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107437

Project Area (the "Original Redevelopment Project Area") for the purpose of implementing tax increment allocation financing ("Tax Increment Allocation Financing") pursuant to the Illinois.Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et seq., as amended (the "Act"); and

WHEREAS, The City Council adopted an ordinance on May 12, 2010 designating the Original Redevelopment Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act; and

WHEREAS, The City Council adopted an ordinance on May 12, 2010 adopting Tax Increment Allocation Financing for the Original Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to the Act; and

WHEREAS, The City desires further to supplement and amend the Original Plan for the Ohginal Redevelopment Project Area to provide for the redevelopment of the Expanded Area; and

WHEREAS, The City has caused to be prepared an eligibility study entitled "West Woodlawn Eligibility Study, Redevelopment Plan and Project Amendment Number 1" and dated July 1, 2010 (the "Eligibility Study"), of the Added Area, which Eligibility Study confirms the existence within the Added Area of various blighting factors as set forth in the Act and supports a finding of eligibility of the Added Area for designation as a blighted area under the Act; and

WHEREAS, The Original Plan, together with the Eligibility Study (collectively, the "Amended Plan"), provides for the Expanded Area; and

WHEREAS, A copy of the Amended Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and

WHEREAS; It is desirable and in the best interest of the citizens of the City for the City to implement Tax Increment Allocation Financing pursuant to the Act for the Expanded Area described in Section 2 of this ordinance, to be redeveloped pursuant to the Amended Plan; and

WHEREAS, The Community Development Commission (the "Commission") ofthe City has heretofore been appointed by the Mayor of the City with the approval of its City Council (collectively, the City Council and the Mayor are referred to herein as the "Corporate Authorities") (as codified in Section 2-124 of the City's Municipal Code) pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-4(k) of the Act; and

107438 JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

WHEREAS, By authority of the Corporate Authorities in accordance with Section 5/11 -74.4-4.2 of the Act and pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-5(a) of the Act, the City's Department of Community Development established an interested parties registry and, on December 14, 2009, published in the Cn/cago Sun-Times or Chicago Tribune a notice that interested persons may register in order to receive information on the proposed designation of the Expanded Area or the approval of the Amended Plan; and

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Sections 5/11-74.4-4 and 5/11-74.4-5 of the Act, the Commission, by authority of the Corporate Authorities, called a public hearing (the "Hearing") on September 14,2010, concerning approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Expanded Area pursuant to the Act; and

WHEREAS, The Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report attached thereto as an exhibit and, if applicable, the feasibility study and the housing impact study) was made available for public inspection and review pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-5(a) of the Act since July 2, 2010, being a date not less than 10 days before the meeting of the Commission at which the Commission adopted Resolution 10-CDC-46 on July 13, 2010, accepting the Amended Plan for review and fixing the time and place for a public hearing ("Hearing"), at the offices of the City Clerk and the City's Department of Community Development; and

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-5(a) of the Act, notice of the availability of the Amended Plan (including the related eligibility report attached thereto as an exhibit and, if applicable, the feasibility study and the housing impact study) was sent by mail on July 30, 2010, which is within a reasonable time after the adoption by the Commission of Resolution 10-CDC-46 to: (a) all residential addresses that, after a good faith effort, were determined to be (i) located within the Expanded Area and (ii) located within 750 feet of the boundaries ofthe Expanded Area (or, if applicable, were determined to be the 750 residential addresses that were closest to the boundaries of the Expanded Area); and (b) organizations and residents that were registered interested parties for such Expanded Area; and

WHEREAS, A meeting of the joint review board established pursuant to Section 5/11-7 4.4-5(b) of the Act (the "Board") was convened upon the provision of due notice on August 6, 2010 at 10:00 A.M., to review the matters properly coming before the Board and to allow it to provide its advisory recommendation regarding the approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Expanded Area, and other matters, if any, properly before it; and

WHEREAS, Pursuant to Sections 5/11-74.4-4 and 5/11-74.4-5 ofthe Act, the Commission held the Hearing concerning approval of the Amended Plan, designation of the Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act and adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing within the Expanded Area pursuant to the Act on September 14, 2010; and

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107439

WHEREAS, The Commission has forwarded to the City Council a copy of its Resolution 10-CDC-52, recommending to the City Council designation ofthe Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act, among other things; and

WHEREAS, The City Council has heretofore approved the Amended Plan, which was identified in An Ordinance Of The City Of Chicago, Illinois Approving Amendment Number 1 To The Redevelopment Plan For The West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area; now, therefore,

Be It Orda/ned by the City Council ofthe City of Chicago:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

SECTION 2. The Expanded Area. The Expanded Area is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. The street location (as near as practicable) for the Expanded Area is described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein. The map of the Expanded Area is depicted on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein.

SECTION 3. Findings. The Corporate Authorities hereby make the following findings:

a. The Expanded Area includes only those contiguous parcels of real property and improvements thereon that are to be substantially benefitted by the proposed Amended Plan improvements, as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4(a) of the Act;

b. As required pursuant to Section 5/11 -74.4-3(p) of the Act:

(i) The Expanded Area is not less, in the aggregate, than one and one-half acres in size; and

(ii) Conditions exist in the Expanded Area that cause the Expanded Area to qualify for designation as a redevelopment project area and a conservation area as defined in the Act;

c. If the Expanded Area is qualified as a "blighted area", whether improved or vacant, each of the factors necessary to qualify the Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area on that basis is (i) clearly present within the intent ofthe Act and with that presence documented to a meaningful extent, and (ii) reasonably distributed throughout the improved part or vacant part, as applicable, of the Expanded Area as required pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-3(a) of the Act.

d. If the Expanded Area is qualified as a "conservation area", the combination of the factors necessary to qualify the Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area on that basis is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare, and the Expanded Area may become a blighted area.

SECTION 4. Expanded Area Designated. The Expanded Area is hereby designated as a redevelopment project area pursuant to Section 5/11-74.4-4 of the Act.

107440

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

SECTION 5. Invalidity Of Any Section. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance.

SECTION 6. Superseder. All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage.

[Exhibit "C" referred to in this ordinance printed on page 107443 of this Journal.]

Exhibits "A" and "B" referred to in this ordinance read as follows:

Exhibit "A".

West Woqd/awn Tax Increment Financing Legal Description.

All that part ofthe southwest quarter of Section 14, the southeast quarter of Section 15, the southwest quarter of Section 15, the northeast quarter of Section 22, the northwest quarter of Section 22, the southeast quarter of Section 22, the southwest quarter of Section 22 and the southwest quarter of Section 23, all in Township 38 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows:

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107441

to Chicago aforesaid; thence west along the easterly extension of the north line of the said 16 foot public alley, along said north line and along the westerly extension thereof to the west line of South Evans Avenue; thence south along said west line of South Evans Avenue to westerly extension pf the north line of Lot 8 in Block 1 of Loring and Gibbs Subdivision of part of the northeast quarter of Section 22 aforesaid; thence east along said westerly extension ofthe north line of Lot 8 and along said north line to the west line of the 16 foot public alley lying east of said South Evans Avenue; thence south along said west line of the 16 foot public alley lying east of said South Evans Avenue to the westerly extension ofthe south line of Lot 14 in Block 1 in A. J. Hawhe's South Park Subdivision of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter and the north three-quarters of the east half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 22; thence east along said westerly extension ofthe south line of Lot 14, along said south line and along the easterly extension thereof, to the east line of South Cottage Grove Avenue; thence south along said east line of South Cottage Grove Avenue to the easterly extension of the south line of East 68^lh Street; thence west along said easterly extension of the south line of East 68^th Street and along said south line to the west line of South Evans Avenue; thence north along said west line of South Evans Avenue to the south line of East 67^lh Street; thence west along said south line of East 67^th Street to the east line of South Champlain Avenue; thence south along said east line of South Champlain Avenue to the south line of East 68^lh Street; thence west along said south line of East 68^th Street to the east line of South St. Lawrence Avenue; thence south along said east line of South St. Lawrence Avenue to the north line of East 69^th Street; thence southwesterly to the intersection of the west line of South St. Lawrence Avenue and the southwesterly line of South Chicago Avenue; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line of South Chicago Avenue to the intersection with the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the south line of East Marquette Road; thence west along said south line of East Marquette Road to a line perpendicular to the north line of East Marquette Road at a point 75.46 feet east of the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive as measured along said north line of East Marquette Road; thence north along said perpendicular line to the north line of East Marquette Road, being also the south line of Block4 in L.C.P. Freer's Subdivision of the east half ofthe northwest quarter of said Section 22 (except part occupied by railroad); thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge pursuant to ordinance passed by City Council June 16, 1955, a distance of 464.82 feet as measured along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 1,597.28 feet>and whose chord has an angle of 63 degrees, 16 minutes, 30 seconds to the right with the westerly extension of the south line of said Block 4; thence continuing northwesterly along said southwesterly line, being a straight line having an angle of 09 degrees, 19 minutes, 35 seconds to the left with the extension of the aforesaid chord to a line 140 feet south of and parallel with the north line of said Block 4; thence east along the;south line of the north 140 feet of Block 4 to the intersection with a line 350 feet northeasterly from and parallel with the northeasterly right-of-way of .the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad; thence northwesterly along said line 350 feet northeasterly from and parallel with the northeasterly right-of-way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad to the point of intersection with the centerline of

107442

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

South Calumet Avenue; thence north along said centerline of South Calumet Avenue to the westerly extension ofthe south line of Block 3 in L.C.P. Freer's Subdivision ofthe east half ofthe northwest quarter of said Section 22; thence east along said westerly extension of the south line of Block 3 and along the south line thereof to the intersection with the northeasterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge to the intersection with the west line of South Calumet Avenue; thence north along said west line of South Calumet Avenue to the north line of East 63^ld Street; thence east along said north line to its intersection with the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (50 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15) to the south line of Lot 9 in the subdivision of Lots 6 and 12 in Wilson, Heald and Stebbin's Subdivision of the east half of the southwest quarter of said Section 15; thence east along said south line of Lot 9 to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (33 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of Lot 1 in the subdivision of Lots 6 and 12 in Wilson, Heald and Stebbin's Subdivision aforesaid; thence west along said north line of Lot 1 to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (50 feet west of the line between the southwest quarterand southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of East 61^s1 Street; thence east along said north line of East 61^sl Street to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (33 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of East 60^th Street and the point of beginning.

Original legal description for West Woodlawn TIF, dated December 28, 2009, was prepared by: Nakawatase Wyns & Associates, Inc., James E. Rores, Illinois Professional Land Surveyor Number 2394, license expires November 30, 2010.

This amended legal description for West Woodlawn TIF, dated June 29, 2010, was amended by: Spaceco, Inc., C. Brian Lounsbury, Illinois Professional Land Surveyor Number 2831, license expires November 30, 2010.

Exhibit "B". Street Location Of The Expanded Area.

The Expanded Area is generally bounded by East 60^,h Street on the north, South Cottage Grove Avenue on the east, East 68^lh Street and South South Chicago Avenue on the south, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive and South Calumet Avenue on the west.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107443

Exhibit "C". Map Of The Expanded Area.

107444

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

ADOPTION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR EXPANDED WEST WOODLAWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA.

[02010-6176]

The Committee on Finance submitted the following report:

CHICAGO, November 17, 2010.

To fne President and Members of the City Council:

Your Committee on Finance, having had under consideration an ordinance adopting tax increment financing for the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area, having had the same under advisement, begs leave to report and recommend that Your Honorable Body Pass the proposed ordinance transmitted herewith.

This recommendation was concurred in by a viva voce vote of the members of the Committee.

Respectfully submitted,

(Signed) EDWARD M. BURKE,

Chairman.

On motion of Alderman Burke, the said proposed ordinance transmitted with the foregoing committee report was Passed by yeas and nays as follows:

Yeas - Aldermen Moreno, Fioretti, Dowell, Preckwinkle, Hairston, Lyle, Jackson, Harris, Beale, Pope, Balcer, Cardenas, Olivo, Burke, Foulkes, Thompson, Thomas, Lane, Rugai, Cochran, Brookins, Mufioz, Zaiewski, Dixon, Solis, Maldonado, Burnett, E. Smith, Graham, Reboyras, Suarez, Waguespack, Mell, Austin, Colon, Rice, Mitts, Allen, Laurino, O'Connor, Doherty, Reilly, Daley, Tunney, Levar, Shiller, Schulter, M. Smith, Moore, Stone -- 50.

Nays - None.

Alderman Pope moved to reconsider the foregoing vote. The motion was lost. The following is said ordinance as passed:

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107445

"Original Redevelopment Project Area") for the purpose of implementing tax increment allocation financing ("Tax Increment Allocation Financing") pursuant to the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et seq., as amended (the "Act"); and

WHEREAS, The City Council adopted an ordinance on May 12, 2010 designating the Original Redevelopment Project Area as a redevelopment project area pursuant to the Act; and

WHEREAS, The City Council adopted an ordinance on May 12, 2010 adopting Tax-. Increment Allocation Financing for the Ohginal Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to the Act; and

WHEREAS, Pursuant to the Designation Ordinance (defined below), the City, to encourage redevelopment of areas located adjacent to the Ohginal Redevelopment Project Area, has expanded the boundaries ofthe Original Redevelopment Project Area and designated such additional project area (the "Added Area") as a redevelopment project area under the Act (together with the Ohginal Redevelopment Project Area, the "Expanded Area"); and

WHEREAS, The Expanded Area is to be known as the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area;

WHEREAS, Pursuant to the Plan Ordinance (defined below), the City has supplemented and amended the redevelopment plan for the Ohginal Redevelopment Project Area to provide for the redevelopment of the Expanded Area (the "Amended Plan"); and

WHEREAS, It is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens ofthe City for the City to implement Tax Increment Allocation Financing pursuant to the Act for the Expanded Area described in Section 2 of this ordinance, to be redeveloped pursuant to the Amended Plan; and

WHEREAS, The Community Development Commission of the City has forwarded to the City Council a copy of its Resolution 10-CDC-52, recommending to the City Council the adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing for the Expanded Area, among other things; and

WHEREAS, As required by the Act, the City has heretofore approved the Amended Plan, which was identified in An Ordinance Of The City Of Chicago, Illinois Approving Amendment Number 1 To The Redevelopment Plan For The West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "Plan Ordinance") and has heretofore designated the Expanded Area as a redevelopment project area by passage of An Ordinance Of The City Of Chicago, Illinois' Designating The Expanded West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area A Redevelopment Project Area Pursuant To The Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (the "Designation Ordinance") and has otherwise complied with all other conditions precedent required by the Act; now, therefore,

)

107446

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

Be It Orda/ned by the City Council of- the City of C/i/cago:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

SECTION 2. Tax Increment Allocation Financing Adopted. Tax Increment Allocation Financing is hereby adopted pursuant to Section -5/11-74.4-8 of the Act to finance redevelopment project costs as defined in the Act and as set forth in the Amended Plan within the Expanded Area legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. The street location (as near as practicable) for the Expanded Area is described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein. The map of the Expanded Area is depicted in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein.

SECTION 3. Allocation Of Ad Valorem Taxes. Pursuant to the Act, the ad valorem taxes, if any, arising from the levies upon taxable real property in the Expanded Area by taxing districts and tax rates determined in the manner provided in Section 5/11-74.4-9(c) of the Act each year after the effective date of this ordinance until redevelopment project costs and all municipal obligations financing redevelopment project costs incurred undertheAct have been paid, shall be divided as follows:

a. That portion of taxes levied upon each taxable lot, block, tract or parcel of real property which is attributable to the lower of the current equalized assessed value or the initial equalized assessed value of each such taxable lot, block, tract or parcel of real property in the Area shall be allocated to, and when collected, shall be paid by the county collector to the respective affected taxing districts in the manner required by law in the absence of the adoption of Tax Increment Allocation Financing; and

b. That portion, if any, of such taxes which is attributable to the increase in the current equalized assessed valuation of each taxable lot, block, tract or parcel of real property in the Area over and above the initial equalized assessed value of each property in the Area shall be allocated to, and when collected, shall be paid to the City treasurer who shall deposit said taxes into that special fund designated the "West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area Special Tax Allocation Fund" of the City for the purpose of paying redevelopment project costs and obligations incurred in the payment thereof.

SECTION 4. Invalidity Of Any Section. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance.

SECTION 5. Superseder. All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage.

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107447

[Exhibit "C" referred to in this ordinance printed on page 107450 of this Journal.]

Exhibits "A" and "B" referred to in this ordinance read as follows:

Exhibit "A". (To Ordinance)

Wesf Wood/awn TIF Legal Description.

All that part of the southwest quarter of Section 14, the.southeast quarter of Section 15, the southwest quarter of Section 15, the northeast quarter of Section 22, the northwest quarter of Section 22, the southeast quarter of Section 22, the southwest quarter of Section 22 and the southwest quarter of Section 23 all in Township 38 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows:

beginning at the intersection of the north line of East 60^lh Street, 66 feet wide, and the west line of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'Drive, 66 feet wide, said intersection being in the southwest quarter of Section 15, Township 38 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence east along said north line of East 60^,h Street to the northerly extension of the east line of South Drexel Avenue; thence south along the northerly extension of said east line of South Drexel Avenue and along said east line to north line of East 62^ndStreet; thence west along said north line of East 62^nd Street to the west line of South Cottage Grove Avenue; thence south along said west line of South Cottage Grove Avenue to the south line of the 16 foot alley, vacated by ordinance passed September 11, 1968 and recorded October 28, 1968 as Document 20658363, lying south of and adjoining Lot 18 in Block 2 ofthe resubdivision ofthe Washington Park Club Addition to Chicago, being a subdivision ofthe south half of the southeast quarter of said Section 15; thence west along the south line of said vacated 16 foot alley to the west line of said Lot 18 extended south; thence north along said southerly extension of the west line of Lot 18 to the easterly extension of the north line of the 16 foot public alley lying south of and adjoining Lot 25 in Block 2 of the resubdivision of the Washington Park Club Addition to Chicago aforesaid; thence west along the easterly extension of the north line of the said 16 foot public alley, along said north line and along the westerly extension thereof to the west line of South Evans Avenue; thence south along said west line of South Evans Avenue to the westeriy extension of the north line of Lot 8 in Block 1 of Loring and Gibbs Subdivision of part of the northeast quarter of Section 22 aforesaid; thence east along

107448

JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO

11/17/2010

said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 8 and along said north line to the west line of the 16 foot public alley lying east of said South Evans Avenue; thence south along said west line of the 16 foot public alley lying east of said South Evans Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 14 in Block 1 in A.J. Hawhe's South Park Subdivision of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter and the north three-quarters of the east half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 22; thence east along said westerly extension of the south line of Lot 14, along said south line and along the easterly extension thereof to the east line of South Cottage Grove Avenue; thence south along said east line of South Cottage Grove Avenue to the easterly extension of the south line of East 68^th Street; thence west along said easterly extension of the south line of East 68^,h Street and along said south line to the west line of South Evans Avenue; thence north along said west line of South Evans Avenue to the south line of East 67^lh Street; thence west along said south line of East 67^lh Street to the east line of South Champlain Avenue; thence south along said east line of South Champlain Avenue to the south line of East 68^,h Street; thence west along said south line of East 68^th Street to the east line of South St. Lawrence Avenue; thence south along said east line of South St. Lawrence Avenue to the north line of East 69^,h Street; thence southwesterly to the intersection of the west line of South St. Lawrence Avenue and the southwesterly line of South South Chicago Avenue; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line of South South Chicago Avenue to the intersection with the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the south line of East Marquette Road; thence west along said south line of East Marquette Road to a line perpendicular to the north line of East Marquette Road at a point 75.46 feet east of the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive as measured along said north line of East Marquette Road; thence north along said perpendicular line to the north line of East Marquette Road, being also the south line of Block 4 in L.C.P. Freer's Subdivision of the east half ofthe northwest quarter of said Section 22 (except part occupied by railroad); thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge pursuant to ordinance passed by City Council June 16, 1955, a distance of 464.82 feet as measured along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 1,597.28 feet and whose chord has an angle of 63 degrees, 16 minutes, 30 seconds to the right with the westerly extension of the south line of said Block 4; thence continuing northwesterly along said southwesterly line, being a straight line having an angle of 09 degrees, 19 minutes, 35 seconds to the left with the extension of the aforesaid chord to a line 140 feet south of and parallel with the north line of said Block 4; thence east along the south line of the north 140 feet of Block 4 to the intersection with a line 350 feet northeasterly from and parallel with the northeasterly right-of-way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad; thence northwesterly along said line 350 feet northeasterly from and parallel with the northeasterly right-of-way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad to the point of intersection with the centerline of South Calumet Avenue; thence north along said centerline of South Calumet Avenue to the westerly extension of the south line of Block 3 in L.C.P. Freer's Subdivision of the east

11/17/2010

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

107449

half of the northwest quarter of said Section 22; thence east along said westeriy extension of the south line of Block 3 and along the south line thereof to the intersection with the northeasterly line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge; thence northwesterly along said northeasteriy line of property acquired by deeds and easements for the Calumet Skyway Toll Bridge to the intersection with the west line of South Calumet Avenue; thence north along said west line of South Calumet Avenue to the north line of East 63^rd Street; thence east along said north line to its intersection with the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive; thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (50 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15) to the south line of Lot 9 in the subdivision of Lots 6 and 12 in Wilson, Heald and Stebbin's Subdivision of the east half of the southwest quarter of said Section 15; thence east along said south line of Lot 9 to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (33 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of Lot 1 in the subdivision of Lots 6 and 12 in Wilson, Heald and Stebbin's Subdivision aforesaid; thence west along said north line of Lot 1 to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (50 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of East 61^st Street; thence east along said north line of East 61^st Street to the west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (33 feet west of the line between the southwest quarter and southeast quarter of said Section 15); thence north along said west line of South Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive to the north line of East 60^th Street and the point of beginning.

This amended legal description for West Woodlawn TIF, dated June 29; 2010, was amended by Spaceco, Inc., C. Brian Lounsbury, Illinois Professional Land Surveyor Number 2831, license expires November 30, 2010.

Exhibit "B". Street Location Of The Expanded Area.

The Expanded Area is generally bounded by East 60^th Street on the north, South Cottage Grove Avenue on the east, East 68^th Street and South Chicago Avenue on the south, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive and South Calumet Avenue on the west.

107450 . JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO 11/17/2010

Exhibit "C". Map Of The Expanded Area.

ilI

! i 4

Legend

IL!_Jl W«i Woodlawn

RPA Doundsry

Nolt: nx-ixi dinottj block number as dertntd by CookCouniy Clerk. All b)«kiar*lnArt»I0.

0 3» (wrm I_1_I_L_J

City of Chicago

West Woodlawn

Tai Increment Finance District

July 2010

STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK

)

) SS )

Attachment B

CERTI

TO:

Judy Baar Topinka

Comptroller of the State of Illinois

James R. Thompson Center

100 West Randolph Street, Suite 15-500

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Attention: June Canello, Director of Local

Government

Dolores Javier, Treasurer

City Colleges of Chicago

226 West Jackson Boulevard, Room 1125

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Herman Brewer Director

Cook County Bureau of Planning & Dev. 69 West Washington Street, Suite 2900 Chicago, Illinois 60602

ICATION

Jean-Claude Brizard Chief Executive Officer Chicago Board of Education 125 South Clark Street, 5th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60603

Jacqueline Torres, Director of Finance Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago 100 East Erie Street, Room 2429 Chicago, Illinois 60611

Douglas Wright

South Cook County Mosquito Abatement District

155th & Dixie Highway P.O.Box 1030 Harvey, Illinois 60426

Dan Donovan, Comptroller Forest Preserve District of Cook County 69 W. Washington Street, Suite 2060 Chicago, IL 60602

Michael P. Kelly, Interim General Superintendent & CEO Chicago Park District 541 North Fairbanks Chicago, Illinois 60611

I, Rahm Emanuel, in connection with the annual report (the "Report") of information required by Section 1 l-74.4-5(d) of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS5/11-74.4-1 et seg,, (the "Act") with regard to the West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Project Area"), do hereby certify as follows:

Attachment B

1. I am the duly qualified and acting Mayor of the City of Chicago, Illinois (the "City") and, as such, I am the City's Chief Executive Officer. This Certification is being given by me in such capacity.

2. During the preceding fiscal year of the City, being January 1 through December 31, 2010, the City complied, in all material respects, with the requirements of the Act, as applicable from time to time, regarding the Redevelopment Project Area.

3. In giving this Certification, I have relied on the opinion ofthe Corporation Counsel of the City furnished in connection with the Report.

4. This Certification may be relied upon only by the addressees hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my official signature as of this 30th day of June, 2011.

Rahm Emanuel, Mayor City of Chicago, Illinois

Department of Law

t on oaii CITY OF CHICAGO June 30, 2011

Attachment C

Judy Baar Topinka

Comptroller ofthe State of Illinois

James R. Thompson Center

100 West Randolph Street, Suite 15-500

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Attention: June Canello, Director of Local

Government

Dolores Javier, Treasurer

City Colleges of Chicago

226 West Jackson Boulevard, Room 1125

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Jean-Claude Brizard Chief Executive Officer Chicago Board of Education 125 South Clark Street, 5th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60603

Jacqueline Torres, Director of Finance Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago 100 East Erie Street, Room 2429 Chicago, Illinois 60611

Herman Brewer Director

Cook County Bureau of Planning & Dev. 69 West Washington Street, Suite 2900 Chicago, Illinois 60602

Douglas Wright

South Cook County Mosquito Abatement District

155th & Dixie Highway P.O. Box 1030 Harvey, Illinois 60426

Dan Donovan, Comptroller Forest Preserve District of Cook County 69 W. Washington Street, Suite 2060 Chicago, IL 60602

Michael P. Kelly, Interim General Superintendent & CEO Chicago Park District 541 North Fairbanks Chicago, Illinois 60611

Re: West Woodlawn

Redevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Project Area")

Dear Addressees:

I am the Corporation Counsel of the City of Chicago, Illinois (the "City") and, in such capacity, I am the head of the City's Law Department. In such capacity, I am providing the opinion required by Section ll-74.4-5(d)(4) of the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seg (the "Act"), in connection with the submission of the report (the "Report") in accordance with, and containing the infonnation required by, Section ll-74.4-5(d) of the Act for the Redevelopment Project Area.

121 NORTH LASALLE STREET, ROOM 600, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602

Attachment C

Opinion of Counsel for 2010 Annual Report Page 2

June 30, 2011

Attorneys, past and present, in the Law Department of the City and familiar with the requirements of the Act, have had general involvement in the proceedings affecting the Redevelopment Project Area, including the preparation of ordinances adopted by the City Council of the City with respect to the following matters: approval ofthe redevelopment plan and project for the Redevelopment Project Area, designation of the Redevelopment Project Area as a redevelopment project area, and adoption of tax increment allocation financing for the Redevelopment Project Area, all in accordance with the then applicable provisions of the Act. Various departments of the City, including, if applicable, the Law Department, Department of Housing and Economic Development, Department of Finance and Office of Budget and Management (collectively, the "City Departments"), have personnel responsible for and familiar with the activities in the Redevelopment Project Area affecting such Department(s) and with the requirements of the Act in connection therewith. Such personnel are encouraged to seek and obtain, and do seek and obtain, the legal guidance ofthe Law Department with respect to issues that may arise from time to time regarding the requirements of, and compliance with, the Act.

In my capacity as Corporation Counsel, I have relied on the general knowledge and actions of the appropriately designated and trained staff of the Law Department and other applicable City Departments involved with the activities affecting the Redevelopment Project Area. In addition, I have caused to be examined or reviewed by members of the Law Department of the City the certified audit report, to the extent required to be obtained by Section 1 l-74.4-5(d)(9) of the Act and submitted as part of the Report, which is required to review compliance with the Act in certain respects, to determine if such audit report contains information that might affect my opinion. I have also caused to be examined or reviewed such other documents and records as were deemed necessary to enable me to render this opinion. Nothing has come to my attention that would result in my need to qualify the opinion hereinafter expressed, subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth, unless and except to the extent set forth in an Exception Schedule attached hereto as Schedule 1.

Based on the foregoing, I am of the opinion that, in all material respects, the City is in compliance with the provisions and requirements of the Act in effect and then applicable at the time actions were taken from time to time with respect to the Redevelopment Project Area.

This opinion is given in an official capacity and not personally and no personal liability shall derive herefrom. Furthermore, the only opinion that is expressed is the opinion specifically set forth herein, and no opinion is implied or should be inferred as to any other matter. Further, this opinion may be relied upon only by the addressees hereof and the Mayor of the City in providing his required certification in connection with the Report, and not by any other party.

Stephen R. Patton Corporation Counsel

ATTACHMENT C

SCHEDULE 1 (Exception Schedule)

(X) ( )

No Exceptions

Note the following Exceptions:

ATTACHMENTS D, E and F

ATTACHMENT D

Activities Statement

Projects that were implemented during the preceding fiscal year, if any, are set forth below: None

Redevelopment activities undertaken within this Project Area during the preceding fiscal year, if any, have been made pursuant to: (i) the Redevlopment Plan for the Project Area, and (ii) any Redevelopment Agreements affecting the Project Area, and are set forth in Section 3 herein by TIF-eligible expenditure category.

ATTACHMENT E

Agreements

Agreements entered into concerning the disposition or redevelopment of property within the Project Area during the preceding fiscal year, if any, are attached hereto.

None

ATTACHMENT F

Additional Information

The amounts shown elsewhere in this report, including those shown In Section 3 herein, have been used to pay for project cost within the Project Area and for debt service (if applicable), all in furtherance of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area.

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevlopment Proiect Area

ATTACHMENT H

CITY OF CHICAGO JOINT REVIEW BOARD

Report of proceedings of a hearing before the City of Chicago, Joint Review Board held on February 5, 2010, at 10:11 a.m. City Hall, Room 1003, Conference Room, Chicago, Illinois, and presided over by Ms. Dorothy Carroll.

PRESENT:

MS. DOROTHY CARROLL, CHAIRPERSON

MS. GLORIA PERALTA

MS. SUSAN MAREK

MR. MULBE DILLARD

MR. RAY SANDERS

MS. MICHELLE MADISON

MR. PETER SKOSEY

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES Chicago, Illinois Carol Robertson

REPORTED BY: By:

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 MS. CARROLL: Welcome to the Joint Review

2 Board meeting. For the record, my name is Dorothy

3 Carroll and I'm the representative of the Chicago Park

4 District, which under Section 11-74.4-5, the Tax

5 Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, is one of the

6 statutorily designated members of the Joint Review

7 Board. Until election of a chairperson I will moderate

8 the Joint Review Board meeting.

9 For the record, there will be two

10 meetings of the Joint Review Board. The first meeting

11 is to review the proposed West Woodlawn Tax Increment

12 Financing District. The date of this meeting was

13 announced and set by the Community Development

14 Commission of the City of Chicago at it's meeting of

15 January 12th, 2010.

16 Notice of this meeting of the Joint

17 Review Board was also provided by certified mail to each

18 taxing district represented on the Board, which includes

19 the Chicago Board of Education, the Chicago Community

20 Colleges, District 508, the Chicago Park District, Cook

21 County, and the City of Chicago. Public notice of this

22 meeting was also posted as of Wednesday, February 3rd,

23 2010 in various locations throughout City Hall.

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 When a proposed redevelopment plan would

2 result in displacement of residents from ten or more

3 inhabited residential units, or would include 75 or more

4 inhabited residential units, the TIF Act requires that

5 the public member of the Joint Review Board must reside

6 in that proposed redevelopment project area.

7 In addition, if a municipality's housing

8 impact study determines that the majority of residential

9 units in the proposed redevelopment project area are

10 occupied by very low, low or moderate income households,

11 as defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable

12 Housing Act, the public member must be a person who

13 resides in very low, low or moderate income housing with

14 the proposed redevelopment project area.

15 With us today is Michele Madison. Are

16 you familiar with the boundaries of the proposed West

17 Woodlawn Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Area?

18 MS. MADISON: I am. I've been in that

19 building since 1950.

20 MS. CARROLL: Good. What is the address of

21 your primary residence?

22 MS. MADISON: 6628 South Rose Avenue, 60637.

23 MS. CARROLL: Thank you. Is the address

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 within the boundaries of the proposed West Woodlawn Tax

2 Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area?

3 MS. MADISON: Yes.

4 MS. CARROLL: Have you provided

5 representatives of the City of Chicago's Department of

6 Community Development with accurate information

7 concerning your income and the income of any other

8 members of the household residing at such address?

9 MS. MADISON: Yes.

10 MS. CARROLL: Ms. Madison, are you willing to

11 serve as the public member for the Joint Review Board

12 for the proposed West Woodlawn Tax Increment Financing

13 Redevelopment Project Area?

14 MS. MADISON: I am.

15 MS. CARROLL: I will entertain a motion that

16 Michele Madison be selected as the public member. Is

17 there a motion?

18 MS. MAREK: So moved.

19 MS. CARROLL: Is there a second? 2 0 MR. DILLARD: Second.

21 MS. CARROLL: All in favor, please vote by

22 saying aye.

23 (Chorus of ayes.)

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 MS. CARROLL: Let the record reflect that

2 Michele Madison was just selected as the public member

3 for the proposed West Woodlawn Tax Increment Financing

4 Redevelopment Project Area.

5 Our next order of business is to select a

6 chairperson for this Joint Review Board. Are there any

7 nominations?

8 MS. MAREK: I'll nominate Dorothy Carroll.

9 MS. CARROLL: Is there a second for the .10 nomination?

11 MS. PERALTA: I'll second.

12 MS. CARROLL: Are there any other nominations?

13 Let the record reflect there were no other nominations.

14 All in favor of this nomination please vote by saying

15 aye.

16 (Chorus of ayes.)

17 MS. CARROLL: Let the record reflect that

18 Dorothy Carroll has been elected as Chairperson and will

19 now serve as the chairperson for the remainder of the

20 meeting.

21 Move to the next portion. As I mentioned

22 at this meeting, we'll be reviewing a plan for the

2 3 proposed tax increment financing district proposed by

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 the City of Chicago. The staff of the City's Department

2 of Community Development and Law and other departments

3 have reviewed this plan which was introduced to the City

4 Counsel's Development Commission January 12th, 2010.

5 We will listen to the presentation by the

6 consultant on the plan. Following the presentation we

7 can address any questions that the members might have

8 for the consultant or City staff. An amendment to the

9 TIF Act requires us to base our recommendation to

10 approve or disapprove the proposed West Woodlawn Tax

11 Increment Financing District on the basis of the area

12 and the plan satisfying the plan requirements, the

13 eligibility criteria defined in the TIF Act, and

14 objectives of the TIF Act.

15 If the Board approves the plan, the Board

16 will then issue an advisory, non binding recommendation

17 by a vote of the majority of those members present and

18 voting. Such recommendation shall be submitted to the

19 City within 3 0 days after the Board meeting. Failure to

20 submit such recommendation shall be deemed to constitute

21 approval by the Board.

22 If the Board disapproves the plan, the

23 Board must issue a written report describing why the

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 plan and area failed to meet one or more of the

2 objectives of the TIF Act and both the plan requirements

3 and the eligibility criteria of the TIF Act.

4 The City will then have 3 0 days to

5 resubmit a revised plan. The Board and the City must

6 also confer during this time to try to resolve issues

7 that led to the Board's disapproval. If such issues .

8 cannot be resolved, or if the revised plan is

9 disapproved, the City may proceed with the plan, but the

10 plan can be approved only with a three-fifths vote of

11 the City Council, excluding positions of members that

12 are vacant, and those members that are ineligible to

13 vote because of conflicts of interest.

14 And, at this time we will discuss West

15 Woodlawn and the consultant will be S.B. Friedman and

16 Company.

17 MS. WALTON: Good morning, my name is Jewell

18 Walton, I'm with S.B. Friedman and Company. We were

19 hired to look at the eligibility study and prepare a

20 redevelopment plan for the West Woodlawn Redevelopment

21 Project Area. The study area generally covers from 6 0th

22 Street to the north, to south Chicago Avenue, and 68th

23 Street from the south, King Drive and Calumet to the

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 west and Cottage Grove to the east. It contains 2,284

2 tax parcels on 64 blocks. That also includes 1,497

3 buildings and covers nearly 350 acres. The exact

4 acreage is about 342.

5 While the boundary here does reflect

6 eligibility for the entire area, the name is for this

7 redevelopment project area was a redevelopment that was

8 happening here in the north corner of the City here,

9 Grove Park. The owners are looking to do a larger

10 redevelopment project of the 5 04 units that are there,

11 but also can, the boundary was make larger to help

12 facilitate redevelopment in other parts of the district

13 as well.

14 We did a field survey to determine

15 eligibility. We looked at all the buildings and did a

16 parcel by parcel eligibility study of the eligibility

17 here. We also obtained information from the City and

18 the county on the history of assessed values, and the

19 condition of underground water and sewer lines to

20 determine eligibility.

21 Based on this research, we determined

22 that the area qualified as a conservation area, meaning

23 that more than 50 percent of the buildings were age 3 5

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 years of age or older, and also four out of a possible

2 13 factors were present and widespread to a meaningful

3 extent. The eligibility maps for some of the main

4 factors where it was less than 100 percent of the

5 parcels are displayed here along -- for future

6 reference.

7 Deterioration was the first factor that

8 we found. 50 percent of the buildings were affected by

9 some form of deterioration that included surface area

10 deterioration, deterioration of alleys, streets,

11 gutters, sidewalks or building deterioration or both.

12 And actually utilities was the second factor. This

13 mainly refers to the condition and age of underground

14 utilities, and in this particular West Woodlawn TIF we

15 found that 56 of the 64 blocks were affected by

16 antiquated sewer lines, which means that the lines

17 underground that are serving this area are more than 100

18 years old.

19 The third was construction below minimum 2 0 code, which a review of building permits from the City

21 indicated that 907 structural -- violations were issued

22 for 130 separate addresses within the TIF district.

23 Analyzed on a block basis this affected 32 of the 64

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 blocks or 50 percent of the parcels within the

2 redevelopment project area.

3 The fourth qualifying factor included

4 lack of community planning. This was shown on an area-

5 wide basis. Mostly some of the evidence of this factor

6 included obsolete parcel, that's ill-configured parcel

7 and development layout and incompatible land uses.

8 We also determined just for, to further

9 show and everything some of the factors that were

10 contributing to this, we looked at some minor factors,

11 included deleterious land use and layout. It's affected

12 ten percent of the parcels within the area, and also

13 excessive vacancies we found approximately nine percent

14 of the buildings in this area are at least 50 percent

15 vacant, according to our field survey.

16 To relieve some of the issues within the

17 redevelopment project area, we developed, along with the

18 City, golden objectives to reach, to, in order to

19 alleviate, or eliminate some of these conditions that

20 qualify the district as a conservation area. We

21 developed a total of 11 objectives, but I'll just go

22 through some of the main points of some of these

23 objectives.

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 The first was to develop residential

2 development and redevelopment that would accommodate

3 current and future residents with a range of income

4 levels and for a variety of housing types, also to

5 create high quality retail development that promotes

6 pedestrian activity and provides off street parking and

7 aptly serves the households in the area, to improve the

8 quality and quantity of open space in streetscape

9 elements, and also to provide areas, particularly along

10 the 63rd Street Green Line, transit oriented

11 development.

12 Part of the eligibility study and

13 redevelopment plan process is to determine what for TIF

14 redevelopment is not likely to occur. So to do that we

15 look at two, we go about it two different ways. We

16 looked at the building activity within the area within

17 the last five years, and also looked at the equalized

18 assessed value over the same time period, which is

19 mainly from January of 2004 to July of 2009.

20 During this time only 11 permits were

21 issued for new construction, and of that, of that 54

22 million that was for new development, but eight percent

23 of that value was contributed to one office building

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 that was actually owned and run by the University of

2 Chicago. The remaining nine million generally produced

3 24 units of housing, three retail structures and the one

4 office building I just spoke about, that's owned by the

5 University of Chicago.

6 In terms of the EAB value, the last year

7 where EAB was finalized which was 2 0 08, the EAB actually

8 went down in value. The peaked in 2006, but these

9 values were based on over inflated market value. While

10 EAB in 2 007 to 2008 actually climbed by approximately

11 one percent, we expect it to decline further once 2009

12 values are finalized.

13 So given the decline in EAB in the

14 limited new construction activity that's happened over

15 the last five years, we felt that public intervention

16 was necessary to correct and restore some of the project

17 development activity.

18 Now for the future land use. The future

19 land use is kept generally to allow for the most

20 flexibility over the 23 year period -- TIF. The

21 predominant land use is for residential and commercial

22 mixed use. The residential mixed use in yellow seeks to

23 preserve the residential land use that already exists,

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 and allows for open parks, for open space, parks, and

2 public and institutional uses were already present.

3 Commercial mixed use allows for

4 commercial, residential mixed use and public institution

5 use. And the industrial/ commercial mixed use which is

6 primarily along Chicago Avenue, allows for wide

7 industrial, commercial and public institution uses.

8 Residential use is not necessarily restricted here

9 because there is some present, but it's not necessarily

10 promoted for this area either. This map can be found,

11 is labeled, it's not within the redevelopment plan.

12 The total budget, the budget that can be

13 spent over the 23 years of the TIF is 69.3 million.

14 There are line items that are allocated for certain

15 expenses. Some of the major ones include 2 8 million for

16 eligible construction costs, which includes affordable

17 housing, 15 billion for the rehabilitation of buildings,

18 11.5 million for public improvements, which includes

19 streets, gutters, sidewalk repairs, et cetera, and eight

20 million for property assembly or demolition in

21 environmental remediation.

22 There are also allowances for

23 professional services, relocation costs, developer

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 construction interest costs, and worker to work in

2 daycare systems.

3 That concludes the consultant's

4 presentation and I can open it up for questions. Thank

5 you.

6 MS. CARROLL: Okay, based on the presentation

7 do any members of the Joint Review Board have any

8 questions?

9 MS. McGUIRE: I'm sorry, I think Ms. Madison

10 wanted to make -- you know, in addition to what her

11 other comments were I think she had one or two other

12 things to say.

13 MS. CARROLL: Thank you.

14 MS. MADISON: I did. I really wanted to share

15 some of the positive thoughts from a poll, little

16 informal poll that I conducted with the residents who

17 have been long time homeowners in West Woodlawn. And

18 like I said, I've been there since 1950 at this point,

19 and, it was mostly all positive. They're looking really

20 forward to having the opportunity to improve their

21 property personally by way of the TIF grants. A lot of

22 them are seniors who are on fixed incomes and not able

23 td do that at this time.

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 They also welcome development on

2 unattended and unsecured vacant lots. Those have been

3 quite a problem for us in terms of serving as

4 thoroughfares for undesirables, hangouts, eyesores for

5 the community.

6 The owners also want to see

7 rehabilitation or demolition of many of the distressed

8 buildings and you alluded to that, and deteriorated

9 buildings in the area that serve as residences for

10 squatters and operating places for drug dealers in our

11 community.

12 They really, really want to see a mixture

13 of market-driven housing, which I know is the goal,

14 because they feel that that would foster a new sense of

15 responsibility on the part of the residents toward

16 community role modeling and expectations that will be

17 put on the residents of that community. Many buildings

18 are currently vacant and are owned by either absentee

19 landlords who do not live in the area, banks, and --2 0 buildings owned by --

21 And so, the expectations mentioned might

22 include a quieter environment for people tp live in,

23 revolution of crime and drug dealing, decrease in

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 loitering and littering. And I have to say, this is my

2 own personal thing, a great deal of excitement centers

3 around not being a food desert, and that's a new term I

4 think that has come up in our society, but West Woodlawn

5 is a food desert.

6 The last major grocery stores that were

7 in our area were A&P and the Dell Farm, moved out in the

8 early '60's. So, and you know, that's a long time ago,

9 so people have to drive to buy food. And my own

10 personal story is just wanting to buy a couple of

11 potatoes, that's all, without getting in my car to ride

12 to Hyde Park or whatever. And looking for the produce

13 section in one of our local stores, it literally was two

14 potatoes that looked very archaic, were shriveled up,

15 ancient, in a bent up aluminum tin. That was their

16 produce section. So we don't even have food for people

17 that, you know, healthy choices.

18 And, for those who comprehend the

19 concept, and of course there are going to be, you know,

20 those that don't understand it all as we go along, but

21 the TIF program was generally received in a positive

22 light. And I just wanted to share that because I, for

23 one, am really happy, you know, --

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 Thank you, thanks for the opportunity.

2 MS. CARROLL: Thank you, Ms. Madison. Well,

3 based on the full presentation, do any of the members of

4 the Joint Review Board have any questions?

5 MS. MADISON: May I ask, what was the area you

6 say that the bigger plan was built around that came,

7 where is that?

8 MS. WALTON: Sure, this is some of which is

9 primarily in the northeast corner of the TIF district.

10 MS. PERALTA: And, there is a project --

11 MS. WALTON: Yeah, there is a project that is

12 planned right now. It will consist of both affordable

13 and market rate housing. And then actually to your

14 point of the food desert, they are hoping on 63rd Street

15 to, actually within the existing Woodlawn TIF which is

16 right adjacent to the West Woodlawn boundary, they're

17 hoping to put in place a grocery store, full service

18 grocery store.

19 "MS. CARROLL: Are there any commitments from 2 0 developers at this time for that?

21 MS. WALTON: They are in the process of

22 pulling that together --

23 MS. CARROLL: I think it's worth mentioning

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 that there was so little development during a time, I

2 mean, the 24 residential housing units from 2004 to

3 2009, was I correct in understanding that?

4 MS. WALTON: Yes.

5 MS. CARROLL: So in 2 0 04/2 005 we would have

6 expected to see some development.

7 MS. WALTON: Right, right, this was the boom

8 of the real estate industry and it only has produced, I

9 want to say this was four buildings -- so it's not all

10 promised to one unit, to one structure, yes, so it has

11 not produced a lot of --

12 MS. CARROLL: Can I ask, is there any more

13 open space to be added? I know that was one of the

14 objectives, this open space besides, we have Grove Park

15 there, but is there any additional open space planned?

16 ' MS. WALTON: Not that I'm aware of. When I

17 spoke about some of the, preserving open space in plans

18 there, as Ms. Madison mentioned there are a lot of

19 vacant and unsecured lots there, so there might be

20 opportunities there to do something. But, and then also

21 within some of their, a couple schools within the

22 district and just outside of the district as well --

23 MR. DILLARD: What was that area again that

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 was going to be redeveloped? I missed that.

2 MS. WALTON: Oh, you're talking about the --

3 MR. DILLARD: Yeah.

4 MS. WALTON: Yeah, it's in the northeast

5 corner of the TIF District.

6 MR. DILLARD: Starting from where?

7 MS. WALTON: Starting from 60th Street

8 certainly to 62nd Street. Now the weave, it covers

9 these parcels as well as the parcels across Cottage

10 Grove.

11 MR. DILLARD: Oh, okay.

12 MS. PERALTA: . And is the grocery store part of

13 that --

14 MS. WALTON: Yeah, it actually extends, that's

15 within the TIF boundary, but it actually also extends,

16 the developed plan extends into part of the Woodlawn TIF

17 as well which has a boundary that kind of jogs along the

18 eastern part of West Woodlawn.

19 MS. MADISON: How do you incorporate all of

20 the parcels that, obviously there's been some rehab

21 going on that don't secure City permits, or do you not

22 consider that at all? Because there's a lot going on

23 that's not part of the --

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 MS. WALTON: Oh, you're talking about --

2 MS. MADISON: As you've looked at, you know,

3 the permits that were drawn over a period of time. A

4 lot of people don't, and we know that.

5 MS. WALTON: Right, I mean, the best way that

6 we can capture in for our records, -- records that the

7 City holds, I'm sure there's some other things that are

8 happening but because there's no firm documentation on

9 that, it's hard for us to really designate that. So we,

10 you know, that's the most valid thing we kind of can,

11 you know, hang our hat on, so that's what we used to

12 determine eligibility.

13 MS. CARROLL: That may be why half the

14 buildings have violations on them.

15 Are there any further questions? Well if

16 there are no further questions I will entertain a motion

17 that this Joint Review Board finds the proposed West

18 Woodlawn Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project

19 Area satisfies the redevelopment plan requirements under

20 the TIF Act. The eligibility criteria defined in

21 Section 11-74.4-3 of the TIF Act and the objectives of

22 the TIF Act, and that based on such findings approve 2 3 such proposed plan under the TIF Act. Is there a

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 motion?

2 MS. MAREK: So moved.

3 MS. CARROLL: Is there a second for the

(

4 motion?

5 MR. DILLARD: I'll second.

6 MR. SANDERS: I'll second.

7 MS. CARROLL: Is there any further discussion?

8 If not, all in favor please vote by saying aye.

9 (Chorus of ayes.)

10 MS. CARROLL: All opposed please vote by

11 saying no. Let the record reflect the Joint Review

12 Board's approval of the proposed West Woodlawn Tax

13 Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area under the

14 TIF Act.

15 And, do I have a motion to adjourn the

16 West Woodlawn TIF meeting?

17 MS. PERALTA: I'll move.

18 MS. CARROLL: Do I have a second?

19 MS. MAREK: Yes.

2 0 MS. CARROLL: Okay. Great. We have now

21 adjourned the West Woodlawn Joint Review Board Meeting.

22 We move to our next order of business, the Randolph/

23 Wells Joint Review Board Meeting.

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 894-9389

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

STATE OF ILLINOIS )

) SS. COUNTY OF C 0 O K )

I, CAROL ROBERTSON, depose and say that I am a direct record court reporter doing business in the State of Illinois; that I reported verbatim the foregoing proceedings and that the foregoing is a true and correct transcript to the best of my knowledge and ability.

CAROL ROBERTSON

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS

DAY OF

, A.D. 2010.

NOTARY PUBLIC

OFFICIAL SEAL RONALD N. LEGRAND.JR. Notary Public - State of Illinois My Commission Expires Oct 03,2010

LeGRAND REPORTING & VIDEO SERVICES (630) 8 94-9389

ATTACHMENTM

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS FY 2010

A list of all Intergovernmental agreements in effect in FY 2010 to which the municpality Is a part, and an accounting of any money transferred or received by the municipality during that fiscal year pursuant to those intergovernmental agreements. [65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-5 (d) (10)]__

Name of Agreement	Description of Agreement	Amount Transferred Out	Amount Received
None

FY 2010

TIF Name: West Woodlawn Redevelopment Proiect Area

West Woodlawn Redevelopment Project Area 2010 Annual Report

Legislation Text

Legislation Details

Legislation Details (With Text)